Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Elevators can't be trusted. Take the stairs... #videogamemusic #gameaudio #Be #videogamecomposer #tty #gamesound #Lou #royaltyfreemusic #Elevator #mechanicalmagic #gamecomposer #videogamecomposer #Oliver #dontyouhaveanythingbettertodo #questionmark #goreadabookcommacleanthegutterscommadoyourhomewarkcommabuildatimemachineellipsis

Leon Riskin Music

8,851 subscribers

279,194 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Gaming Music #videogamemusic #gameaudio #Be #videogamecomposer #tty #gamesound #Lou #royaltyfreemusic #Elevator #mechanicalmagic #gamecomposer #videogamecomposer #Oliver #dontyouhaveanythingbettertodo #questionmark

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Video game royalty free music from the "Midnight Strawberries Collection". Also on #spotify and #applemusic #videogamemusic #gameaudio #gameost #gamecomposer #videogamecomposer #indiegamedev #stopnoopingaroundthehashtags #notrufflesinhere

Video game royalty free music from the "Midnight Strawberries Collection". Also on #spotify and #applemusic #videogamemusic #gameaudio #gameost #gamecomposer #videogamecomposer #indiegamedev #stopnoopingaroundthehashtags #notrufflesinhere

Leon Riskin Music

18,723 views • 9 months ago

One For The Road (full version) I had this short sketch, that was initially planned to be used in a small indie game that never happened. Just the first 4 bars. Long before #FNAFWORLD. I revived it and added some synth sounds to the orchestral instruments to give it something extra. Along came 2 additional themes with the same instrumentation. Here is a non loopable first version with a proper ending. #FNAF #fnafost #gameaudio #videogamemusic #gamemusic #videogamecomposer

One For The Road (full version) I had this short sketch, that was initially planned to be used in a small indie game that never happened. Just the first 4 bars. Long before #FNAFWORLD. I revived it and added some synth sounds to the orchestral instruments to give it something extra. Along came 2 additional themes with the same instrumentation. Here is a non loopable first version with a proper ending. #FNAF #fnafost #gameaudio #videogamemusic #gamemusic #videogamecomposer

Leon Riskin Music

16,687 views • 1 year ago

The husband said he wanted to take the stairs to see if the elevator would be faster than him. But in reality, on each floor, he had prepared a gift for his wife.

The husband said he wanted to take the stairs to see if the elevator would be faster than him. But in reality, on each floor, he had prepared a gift for his wife.

The Figen

10,706,094 views • 6 months ago

NEWWIEE X GH BANK #ธอสxนิวฐิติภูมิ #Newwiee #POLCASAN [ talks abt having elevator at home ] 🐻‍❄ Only 3 floors, I can just walk on the stairs. 🎤 Just install the shaft first. Just in case. 🎤 Are you gonna build a room for your child? 🐻‍❄ Of course, it's the elevator shaft you talk about before. 🎤 Inside there? 🐻‍❄ Yes, inside there. 🎤 Pity him. 🐻‍❄ Well, due to his big size. An elevator shaft would fit him just right. So if one day he had to leave the house when older, the shaft can be function as an real elevator. 🎤 That sounds good. 🐻‍❄ Right? 🎤 Dad loves him. 🐻‍❄ Having his own space, and something. In the shaft. 🎤 The air probably good as well. 🐻‍❄ Yes. 🎤 Will you give aircon inside? 🐻‍❄ Of course, of course. 🎤 Oh, that's good, that's good. 🐻‍❄ The aircon from the house and circulate into the shaft. 🐻‍❄ At one special night, maybe there'll be Santa crawled down from the shaft as well. 🎤 And Santa can't going down. What are we talking about?!

NEWWIEE X GH BANK #ธอสxนิวฐิติภูมิ #Newwiee #POLCASAN [ talks abt having elevator at home ] 🐻‍❄ Only 3 floors, I can just walk on the stairs. 🎤 Just install the shaft first. Just in case. 🎤 Are you gonna build a room for your child? 🐻‍❄ Of course, it's the elevator shaft you talk about before. 🎤 Inside there? 🐻‍❄ Yes, inside there. 🎤 Pity him. 🐻‍❄ Well, due to his big size. An elevator shaft would fit him just right. So if one day he had to leave the house when older, the shaft can be function as an real elevator. 🎤 That sounds good. 🐻‍❄ Right? 🎤 Dad loves him. 🐻‍❄ Having his own space, and something. In the shaft. 🎤 The air probably good as well. 🐻‍❄ Yes. 🎤 Will you give aircon inside? 🐻‍❄ Of course, of course. 🎤 Oh, that's good, that's good. 🐻‍❄ The aircon from the house and circulate into the shaft. 🐻‍❄ At one special night, maybe there'll be Santa crawled down from the shaft as well. 🎤 And Santa can't going down. What are we talking about?!

deeコ

23,136 views • 2 months ago

I saw this video yesterday. Imagine feeding stray dogs and they still end up biting you. Stray Dogs are just animals and they can't be trusted. If someone's pet dog bites you, you can take up the matter with its owner. In case of stray dogs, nobody is there. On top of that, these retarded dog lovers will probably blame you for instigating the stray dogs.

I saw this video yesterday. Imagine feeding stray dogs and they still end up biting you. Stray Dogs are just animals and they can't be trusted. If someone's pet dog bites you, you can take up the matter with its owner. In case of stray dogs, nobody is there. On top of that, these retarded dog lovers will probably blame you for instigating the stray dogs.

Incognito

18,802 views • 2 months ago

NHS IS ONLY SAFE WITH THE CONSERVATIVES. There is only one party to ever cut the NHS... and that's the Labour Party in Wales. As a consequence there waiting times are 4 times those in England You can only trust the Conservatives with the NHS. It has a well funded and secure future under us. Take a good long look at Labour, they can't be trusted with the NHS. #NHS #Conservatives #Election2024

NHS IS ONLY SAFE WITH THE CONSERVATIVES. There is only one party to ever cut the NHS... and that's the Labour Party in Wales. As a consequence there waiting times are 4 times those in England You can only trust the Conservatives with the NHS. It has a well funded and secure future under us. Take a good long look at Labour, they can't be trusted with the NHS. #NHS #Conservatives #Election2024

Cllr Jamie Mulhall

40,609 views • 2 years ago

NEW: Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo breaks down President Trump’s high-stakes meeting in Turkey ahead of the NATO summit. His take on President Trump's top priority? Stop letting the U.S. carry the heavy load. "If there's a single thing with Trump, President Trump and NATO, it is 'folks, get serious. Do you need to be a trusted partner? We'll be with you. We're happy to support NATO and the collective defense effort, but you have to be a partner that's worthy of that. You can't just sit back and let us carry the heavy load.' "So if there was a single thing he's going to focus on, it will be to continue, not just to get them to spend money, but to focus, to spend that money well, to build their own forces, that is, people, armies, navies, air forces do the things necessary to be a good partner inside of NATO. And the United States will be with you. That I think will be his top priority."

NEW: Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo breaks down President Trump’s high-stakes meeting in Turkey ahead of the NATO summit. His take on President Trump's top priority? Stop letting the U.S. carry the heavy load. "If there's a single thing with Trump, President Trump and NATO, it is 'folks, get serious. Do you need to be a trusted partner? We'll be with you. We're happy to support NATO and the collective defense effort, but you have to be a partner that's worthy of that. You can't just sit back and let us carry the heavy load.' "So if there was a single thing he's going to focus on, it will be to continue, not just to get them to spend money, but to focus, to spend that money well, to build their own forces, that is, people, armies, navies, air forces do the things necessary to be a good partner inside of NATO. And the United States will be with you. That I think will be his top priority."

FOX & Friends

19,171 views • 13 days ago

David Friedberg: Through Zero-Based Budgeting, DOGE is Compelling Americans to Ask the Fundamental Question of Government On E214, david friedberg broke down the impact Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk are having: "If you zoom out on what DOGE is doing, I think the best way to describe it is zero-based budgeting." " In organizations that go through zero-based budgeting, you do a cycle, typically annually, where you take all of your OpEx, all of your expenses in running a company down to the studs." "You take it down to zero, and you rebuild it up..." " They're doing a zero-based budgeting on the federal government." "They're looking at every line item and they're asking the fundamental question, which I don't think we talk about in the public discourse enough, which is, 'What is the essential role of government?'" "And there is a great debate to be had around that point." "Should the government be providing humanitarian aid in international markets?" "Should the government be providing security to nations that can't provide security for themselves?" "Should the government be providing loans for people to go to sh*tty universities?" " Should the government be providing loans for people to buy homes that are overpriced?" "And as we start to ask the questions of how we're spending money, I think it ends up leading to the most important questions, which is what is the essential role of government?" "Which I think is the debate that needs to be had in order for the democracy to last."

David Friedberg: Through Zero-Based Budgeting, DOGE is Compelling Americans to Ask the Fundamental Question of Government On E214, david friedberg broke down the impact Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk are having: "If you zoom out on what DOGE is doing, I think the best way to describe it is zero-based budgeting." " In organizations that go through zero-based budgeting, you do a cycle, typically annually, where you take all of your OpEx, all of your expenses in running a company down to the studs." "You take it down to zero, and you rebuild it up..." " They're doing a zero-based budgeting on the federal government." "They're looking at every line item and they're asking the fundamental question, which I don't think we talk about in the public discourse enough, which is, 'What is the essential role of government?'" "And there is a great debate to be had around that point." "Should the government be providing humanitarian aid in international markets?" "Should the government be providing security to nations that can't provide security for themselves?" "Should the government be providing loans for people to go to sh*tty universities?" " Should the government be providing loans for people to buy homes that are overpriced?" "And as we start to ask the questions of how we're spending money, I think it ends up leading to the most important questions, which is what is the essential role of government?" "Which I think is the debate that needs to be had in order for the democracy to last."

The All-In Podcast

260,998 views • 1 year ago

Trevor Philips, "What about people who think Putin is a good guy" Nigel Farage, "Here we go, Brexit won in the referendum, it must be the Russians" Trevor Philips, "Are you aware that these bots, probably Russian inspired, are interfering in the election?" Nigel Farage, "Don't talk cobblers" Trevor Philips, "The deputy prime minister is talking cobblers?" Nigel Farage, "Oliver Dowden saying there are Russian bots involved.. Did you ask him how many millions did he take from Russian sources?" Trevor Philips, "You can't keep doing this. Asking yourself a question and then answering it" Nigel Farage, "This is the Russia hoax"

Trevor Philips, "What about people who think Putin is a good guy" Nigel Farage, "Here we go, Brexit won in the referendum, it must be the Russians" Trevor Philips, "Are you aware that these bots, probably Russian inspired, are interfering in the election?" Nigel Farage, "Don't talk cobblers" Trevor Philips, "The deputy prime minister is talking cobblers?" Nigel Farage, "Oliver Dowden saying there are Russian bots involved.. Did you ask him how many millions did he take from Russian sources?" Trevor Philips, "You can't keep doing this. Asking yourself a question and then answering it" Nigel Farage, "This is the Russia hoax"

Farrukh

1,489,299 views • 2 years ago

Speaking of corruption and also about how Byron Donalds doesn't even have the temperament to lead here's this. In a Naples grocery store, Donalds approached Kelly Mason over a lawsuit involving him and his wife over a Charter School they attempted to take over. Donalds confronted her in public, and when she disengaged he followed her and lurched over her screaming for her to “stop the lawsuits” and settle it “right now.” When a man can't defer a personal dispute in a supermarket how he can be trusted to govern a state?

Speaking of corruption and also about how Byron Donalds doesn't even have the temperament to lead here's this. In a Naples grocery store, Donalds approached Kelly Mason over a lawsuit involving him and his wife over a Charter School they attempted to take over. Donalds confronted her in public, and when she disengaged he followed her and lurched over her screaming for her to “stop the lawsuits” and settle it “right now.” When a man can't defer a personal dispute in a supermarket how he can be trusted to govern a state?

The Rational Purview

253,021 views • 3 months ago

seungkwan's full story about his knee condition.. take away his pain please :( 🍊 my knees gotten a little bad. it became a chronic condition. i have to be careful with running [now]. i once ran for a long time. the next day after that, i went up on a hill and [my knees] felt wobbly wobbly. i think that's when the knee pain really started.. since then, i've been receiving continuous treatment and rehabilitation little by little and it got better. while performing at concert, sometimes it hurts a bit and things like that, but it's not something very serious 🐱 still you have to take care of yourself consistently 🍊 i have to, since inevitably our job requires us to keep dancing 🎀 then isn't it bad when you go up stairs? 🍊 yea even going up, i think [while stepping was] 'this is bad'. so i pause halfway going up 🎀 try not to use stairs much now 🐱 but they say for the knee, going down is worse than going up. so take the elevator when going down instead. and when going up, use your back well and your gluteus medius (hip muscles) properly 🍊 right i do it that way so that fluid doesn't build up in my knees

seungkwan's full story about his knee condition.. take away his pain please :( 🍊 my knees gotten a little bad. it became a chronic condition. i have to be careful with running [now]. i once ran for a long time. the next day after that, i went up on a hill and [my knees] felt wobbly wobbly. i think that's when the knee pain really started.. since then, i've been receiving continuous treatment and rehabilitation little by little and it got better. while performing at concert, sometimes it hurts a bit and things like that, but it's not something very serious 🐱 still you have to take care of yourself consistently 🍊 i have to, since inevitably our job requires us to keep dancing 🎀 then isn't it bad when you go up stairs? 🍊 yea even going up, i think [while stepping was] 'this is bad'. so i pause halfway going up 🎀 try not to use stairs much now 🐱 but they say for the knee, going down is worse than going up. so take the elevator when going down instead. and when going up, use your back well and your gluteus medius (hip muscles) properly 🍊 right i do it that way so that fluid doesn't build up in my knees

🐻

59,877 views • 9 months ago

BREAKING: Nick Fuentes, who built his entire brand on the idea that all he wants is fReEdOm oF sPeEcH, couldn't handle a doorbell ring without becoming violent. Fuentes pleaded guilty two days ago to a misdemeanor battery charge instead of having to appear today in Cook County, Illinois, for pepper-spraying and shoving a woman down stairs after she confronted him about his viral "your body, my choice" tweet on Nov 5 last year. He must take an anger management course, do 75 hours of community service, pay for her damaged phone, and apologize in person. The 58-year-old woman, who describes herself as a "Jewish feminist," told the Daily Mail that the community service "can't be for white supremacists."

David Schwartz

468,699 views • 7 months ago

In most countries, half the buttons you press in a day might be placebos. The walk button at the crossing, the close-door button in the elevator, the thermostat on the office wall. They click, they light up, and many of them are not actually wired to anything. Take New York, in the United States. Of the roughly 3,250 buttons at its pedestrian crossings, fewer than 120 actually do anything. The rest click when you press them, they look like working buttons, but they have not been connected to the traffic lights for more than thirty years. The city quietly deactivated them in the late 1980s when the signals moved to a computer system. Nobody told the public, because the public kept pressing them anyway. The close-door button in most American elevators is in the same condition. It has been doing nothing since 1990. That was the year the Americans with Disabilities Act passed, which required elevator doors to stay open long enough for someone in a wheelchair or on crutches to get in. The button stayed on the panel, but the wiring was cut. Karen Penafiel, who ran the National Elevator Industry trade group, confirmed this plainly to the New York Times a few years ago. In Hong Kong, the walk button at many pedestrian crossings is real during quiet hours and a placebo during rush hour. A central traffic computer decides which one it is, depending on how busy the road is. The same button, pressed by the same person at the same crossing, might or might not be doing anything, depending on the time of day. Parts of the UK and Australia use the same system. Office thermostats have their own version of this. A 2003 piece in the Wall Street Journal revealed that landlords in the US had been installing dummy thermostats in commercial buildings for years. A tenant would complain about the temperature, an engineer would walk over, turn a dial that controlled nothing, and the complaints would stop. One HVAC specialist estimated that as many as ninety percent of office thermostats in the country were fake. Other engineers said it was closer to two percent. Either way, it was widespread enough to be a known trick of the trade. These are only the places where someone has bothered to investigate and report it. Nobody has done a proper audit of the buttons in Lagos, or Nairobi, or Jakarta, or Mexico City, or Karachi. The crossings, elevators, and thermostats in those cities were installed by the same manufacturers, run by the same kinds of building managers, governed by the same kinds of traffic computers. There is no particular reason to assume the buttons there are any more honest than the ones in New York. A Harvard psychologist named Ellen Langer has a name for what is going on. She calls it the illusion of control. When you press the button, even if nothing happens, your brain registers that you took an action, and the waiting becomes easier. The door closes eventually, the light changes, the office cools down. And every time, your brain credits the button.

In most countries, half the buttons you press in a day might be placebos. The walk button at the crossing, the close-door button in the elevator, the thermostat on the office wall. They click, they light up, and many of them are not actually wired to anything. Take New York, in the United States. Of the roughly 3,250 buttons at its pedestrian crossings, fewer than 120 actually do anything. The rest click when you press them, they look like working buttons, but they have not been connected to the traffic lights for more than thirty years. The city quietly deactivated them in the late 1980s when the signals moved to a computer system. Nobody told the public, because the public kept pressing them anyway. The close-door button in most American elevators is in the same condition. It has been doing nothing since 1990. That was the year the Americans with Disabilities Act passed, which required elevator doors to stay open long enough for someone in a wheelchair or on crutches to get in. The button stayed on the panel, but the wiring was cut. Karen Penafiel, who ran the National Elevator Industry trade group, confirmed this plainly to the New York Times a few years ago. In Hong Kong, the walk button at many pedestrian crossings is real during quiet hours and a placebo during rush hour. A central traffic computer decides which one it is, depending on how busy the road is. The same button, pressed by the same person at the same crossing, might or might not be doing anything, depending on the time of day. Parts of the UK and Australia use the same system. Office thermostats have their own version of this. A 2003 piece in the Wall Street Journal revealed that landlords in the US had been installing dummy thermostats in commercial buildings for years. A tenant would complain about the temperature, an engineer would walk over, turn a dial that controlled nothing, and the complaints would stop. One HVAC specialist estimated that as many as ninety percent of office thermostats in the country were fake. Other engineers said it was closer to two percent. Either way, it was widespread enough to be a known trick of the trade. These are only the places where someone has bothered to investigate and report it. Nobody has done a proper audit of the buttons in Lagos, or Nairobi, or Jakarta, or Mexico City, or Karachi. The crossings, elevators, and thermostats in those cities were installed by the same manufacturers, run by the same kinds of building managers, governed by the same kinds of traffic computers. There is no particular reason to assume the buttons there are any more honest than the ones in New York. A Harvard psychologist named Ellen Langer has a name for what is going on. She calls it the illusion of control. When you press the button, even if nothing happens, your brain registers that you took an action, and the waiting becomes easier. The door closes eventually, the light changes, the office cools down. And every time, your brain credits the button.

Lemma the Optimist

101,846 views • 1 month ago

💥 RIGHT NOW IN GENEVA SWITZERLAND, the Australian Labor party are trying to sell the WHO as an organisation that every country should sign a binding agreement with under WHO Pandemic Treaty and IHR amendments. This video clip with 2 x Medical Specialists in their field tell a different story. This is about the World Health Organisation and their involvement with the Covid Pandemic and early treatments that would have saved lives. This makes it clear they can't be trusted to manage Global Health. Each Sovereign Nation should take the best medical advice available from any country doing the right thing, instead of locking themselves into centralised control mechanisms largely funded by Bill Gates, who has conflicts of interest, largely influenced by his Tax Free Corporation "The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation". SHARE this message! SAY NO to organisations that "Guaranteed we were going to have a Pandemic" - Nikolai Petrovski

💥 RIGHT NOW IN GENEVA SWITZERLAND, the Australian Labor party are trying to sell the WHO as an organisation that every country should sign a binding agreement with under WHO Pandemic Treaty and IHR amendments. This video clip with 2 x Medical Specialists in their field tell a different story. This is about the World Health Organisation and their involvement with the Covid Pandemic and early treatments that would have saved lives. This makes it clear they can't be trusted to manage Global Health. Each Sovereign Nation should take the best medical advice available from any country doing the right thing, instead of locking themselves into centralised control mechanisms largely funded by Bill Gates, who has conflicts of interest, largely influenced by his Tax Free Corporation "The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation". SHARE this message! SAY NO to organisations that "Guaranteed we were going to have a Pandemic" - Nikolai Petrovski

Humanspective

31,174 views • 2 years ago

Jordan Peterson on why you can't be good without integrating your capacity for aggression: Peterson argues that morality without aggression is hollow. The person who has never developed their capacity for force isn't actually good. They're just harmless. And there's a crucial difference. "No one can be a good person without integrating their capacity for aggression. Because without that capacity for aggression, you cannot say no." He unpacks what a real "no" actually means: "No means, if you really say it, no means there isn't anything that you can do to me that will make me change my mind. Or conversely, it means I will play for higher stakes than you will. And unless you've got your aggression integrated, there isn't a chance you can say that. And if you did, no one would take you seriously, because they'd know it was just a show." This is where Peterson brings in Jung and contrasts him with Freud. For Freud, morality was the super ego clamping down on the id. The aggressive, instinctual parts of you were the enemy, and the moral project was suppression. Jung saw it differently. Peterson explains that Jung was deeply interested in the problem of evil, particularly while trying to make sense of Nazi Germany and the Second World War. The question that preoccupied him: what do you do with the part of you that's aggressive and potentially malevolent? "Do you just crush it? That's the super ego response in some sense. Do you just put it behind you, so to speak? Is that a possibility? Or do you admit to its existence and bring it into the game?" Jung's answer, what Peterson calls "the integration of the shadow" was to invite the bad guys out to play rather than lock them in the basement. The hockey player analogy lands the point: "You're an aggressive hockey player, but it's disciplined aggression that gives you access to a whole source of energy you wouldn't otherwise have." Goodness is the disciplined integration of harm. A person who can't be dangerous can't really be trusted when they say no, can't protect what matters, and is cut off from an enormous reservoir of energy. The moral person is the one who has made peace with theirs and put it to work.

Jordan Peterson on why you can't be good without integrating your capacity for aggression: Peterson argues that morality without aggression is hollow. The person who has never developed their capacity for force isn't actually good. They're just harmless. And there's a crucial difference. "No one can be a good person without integrating their capacity for aggression. Because without that capacity for aggression, you cannot say no." He unpacks what a real "no" actually means: "No means, if you really say it, no means there isn't anything that you can do to me that will make me change my mind. Or conversely, it means I will play for higher stakes than you will. And unless you've got your aggression integrated, there isn't a chance you can say that. And if you did, no one would take you seriously, because they'd know it was just a show." This is where Peterson brings in Jung and contrasts him with Freud. For Freud, morality was the super ego clamping down on the id. The aggressive, instinctual parts of you were the enemy, and the moral project was suppression. Jung saw it differently. Peterson explains that Jung was deeply interested in the problem of evil, particularly while trying to make sense of Nazi Germany and the Second World War. The question that preoccupied him: what do you do with the part of you that's aggressive and potentially malevolent? "Do you just crush it? That's the super ego response in some sense. Do you just put it behind you, so to speak? Is that a possibility? Or do you admit to its existence and bring it into the game?" Jung's answer, what Peterson calls "the integration of the shadow" was to invite the bad guys out to play rather than lock them in the basement. The hockey player analogy lands the point: "You're an aggressive hockey player, but it's disciplined aggression that gives you access to a whole source of energy you wouldn't otherwise have." Goodness is the disciplined integration of harm. A person who can't be dangerous can't really be trusted when they say no, can't protect what matters, and is cut off from an enormous reservoir of energy. The moral person is the one who has made peace with theirs and put it to work.

Kevin Tanaka

22,073 views • 2 months ago

FULL TRANSCRIPT OF ELON'S CYBERCAB AND ROBOVAN PRESENTATION 00:00 Welcome 01:16 Cybercab & Future of transportation 04:33 Cost 05:53 Timeline 07:13 Self-driving technology 10:05 Inductive charging 10:24 The cities of the future 11:04 Robovan 12:13 Optimus Welcome Welcome to the We, Robot party. We have quite a show for you tonight. I think you're going to like it. As you can see, I just arrived in the Robotaxi, the Cybercab. And there's 20 more where that came from. So they've been traveling, there's no people in them. As you can see, the car is just going by with no people. We have 50 fully autonomous cars here tonight. So you'll see model Y's and the Cybercabs, all driverless. You'll be able to take a ride in the Cybercab. There's no steering wheel or pedals. So I hope this goes well, we'll find out. You see a lot of sci-fi movies where the future is dark and dismal, where it's not a future you want to be in. So, you know, I love Blade Runner, but I don't know if we want that future. We want that duster he's wearing, but not the bleak apocalypse. We want to have a fun, exciting future that, if you could look in a crystal ball and see the future, you'd be like, yes, I wish I could be there now. That's what we want. Cybercab & Future of transportation So, when we think about transport today, there's a lot of pain that we take for granted, that we think is normal. Like having to drive around LA in 3 hours of traffic. Yeah, people that live in LA, I mean, you know, try to get from Pasadena to El Segundo during rush hour. You can fly to another city faster than you can get to LA. And you have to drive the whole way, unless you're in a Tesla. Of course, our Tesla already does quite well at this supervised self-driving. So, supervised full self-driving is actually working quite well. I'm sure there's people in the crowd who are using that. So, we'll move from supervised full self-driving to unsupervised full self-driving where the car, you could fall asleep and wake up at your destination. But there's also a challenge for a lot of people that cars cost too much. I mean, when you factor in everything that goes into a car and the car insurance and the car payments, storage of the car, it's very expensive. You say, like, how many hours a week are cars used? Your average passenger car is only used about 10 hours a week out of 168 hours. So, the vast majority of the time cars are just doing nothing. But if they're autonomous, they could be used, I don't know, five times more, maybe ten times more. So you could actually, for the same car, would have five times as much value, maybe ten times as much value. There's 168 hours in the week, and like I said, only ten of them are used for driving. And then, a bunch of those hours are looking for a parking spot, which can be pretty annoying at times. So, with autonomy, you get your time back. This is a very big deal. So it's not just, it'll save lives, like a lot of lives and prevent injuries. I think we'll see autonomous cars become ten times safer than a human. I mean, if you think of times past where there used to be an elevator operator in every elevator but once in a while, they get tired and accidentally shear somebody in half. Now, we have automated elevators. You just get an elevator and you press a button and you don't even think about it and it just takes you to the floor. And if you did see an elevator operator with a big relay switch, you'd be like, that's weird. That's how cars will be. And it's not just the lives saved in injuries, but if you think about the cumulative time that people spend in a car and the time that they will get back that they can now spend, well, I guess, on their phones or watching a movie or doing work or whatever you want to do you can think of the car in autonomous world as being like just little lounge. You're just sitting in a comfortable little lounge and you can do whatever you want while you're in this comfortable little lounge. And when you get out, you will be at your destination. So, yeah, it's gonna be awesome. Cost So, in fact, I think the cost of autonomous transport will be so low that you can think of it like individualized mass transit. The average cost of a bus per mile for a city, not the ticket price, because that is subsidized, but the average price is about a dollar a mile, whereas the cost of Cybercab we think probably over time, the operating cost is probably going to be around twenty cents a mile. Including taxes and everything else, it probably ends up being 30 or 40 cents a mile. And you will be able to buy one. And we expect the cost to be below $30,000. And I think there'll be an interesting business model where, let's say somebody is an Uber or Lyft driver today where they can actually sort of manage a fleet of cars and like, sort of manage, I don't know, 10, 20 cars and just take care of them. Like a shepherd tends their flock. You have a little flock of cars and you're the shepherd and you take care of your flock of cars. I think that would be pretty cool. I think it's going to be a glorious future. It's going to be really something special. Timeline We do expect actually to start fully autonomous unsupervised FSD in Texas and California next year. And that's obviously, that's with the Model 3 and Model Y. And then we expect to be in production with the Cybercab, which is really highly optimized for autonomous transport in probably, I tend to be a little optimistic with time frames, but in 2026. So, yeah, before 2027, let me put it that way. And we'll make this vehicle in very high volume. But well, before that, you will experience a robotic taxi via the Model 3 and Model Y program and model S and X, too. But the Model 3 and Y will achieve unsupervised full self-driving with permission, in wherever regulators essentially approve it. In the US, and then to follow outside the US. And Cybertruck, too. All our cars are basically, all cars that we make. Let's not get nuanced here. Self-driving technology One of the reasons why the computer can be so much better than a person is that we have millions of cars that are training on driving. It's like living millions of lives simultaneously and seeing very unusual situations that a person in their entire lifetime would not see. With that amount of training data, it's obviously going to be much better than what a human could be because you can't live a million lives. And it's also, it can see in all directions simultaneously and it doesn't get tired or text or any of those things. So, it will naturally be, like I said 10, 20, 30 times safer than a human, just for all those reasons. And I want to emphasize that the solution that we have is, AI and vision. So, there's no expensive equipment needed. The Model 3 and Model Y and S and X that we make today will be capable of full autonomy, unsupervised. And that means that our cost of producing the vehicle is low. Now, we are going to actually over-spec the computer for the Cybercab. So, our AI 5 computer will be somewhat over-spec'd because I think there's actually also an opportunity, sort of like an Amazon Web Services, where if the car is driving for 50 hours a week, there's still over 100 hours left and there's a potential there to have a massive amount of distributed inference compute, where if you've got like a fleet of 100 million vehicles and a kilowatt of efficient inference compute, you have 100 gigawatts of compute, which is really quite substantial. And if it's there, you might as well use it so that I think will make sense. So, our autonomous future is here. As I said, we've got 50 Teslas driving autonomously. We're trying to give you a sense of what cities will be like in the future. And when you get in, you'll see like, it's really quite a wild experience to just be in a car with no steering wheel, no pedals, no controls, and it feels great. So we have enough vehicles here, so everyone should be able to try it out and experience the set that we've built here. It's a very big set. So it's like really we've used I don't know, 20, 30 acres or something like that. It's really big. So, it goes on, the ride's long. And we set it up to feel like a ride, like a park ride. So, it'll be cool and you'll get to experience it tonight. Inductive charging Something we're also doing is and it's really high time we did this is inductive charging. So, the robotaxi has no plug. It just goes over the inductive charger and charges. So, yeah, it's kind of how it should be. The cities of the future One of the things that is really interesting is how will this affect the cities that we live in. And when you drive around a city, or when the car drives you around the city, you'll see there's a lot of parking lots. There's parking lots everywhere, parking garages. What would happen if you have an autonomous world is that you can now turn parking lots into parks. And so, from we're taking the inglot out of parking lot. You're welcome. So, there's a lot of opportunity to create green space in the cities that we live in. So, like, that would be quite fantastic. Robovan Oh, and also, what happens if you need a vehicle that is bigger than a Model Y? The Robovan. We're going to make this and it's going to look like that. Now, can you imagine going down the streets and you see this coming towards you? That'd be sick. So this can carry up to 20 people, and it can also transport goods. You can configure it for goods transport within a city. Or transport of up to 20 people at a time. The Robovan is what's gonna solve for high density. If you want to take a sports team somewhere or you're looking to really get the cost of travel down to, I don't know, 5, 10 cents a mile, then you can use the Robovan. One of the things we want to do, and we've seen this with the Cybertruck, is we want to change the look of the roads. The future should look like the future. Optimus Speaking of robots. Everything we've developed for our cars, the batteries, power electronics, the advanced motors, gearboxes, the software, the AI inference computer, it all actually applies to a humanoid robot. The same techniques. It's just a robot with arms and legs instead of a robot with wheels. We've made a lot of progress with Optimus. And as you can see, we started up with someone in a robot suit. And then, we've progressed dramatically, year after year. So, if you extrapolate this, you're really going to have something spectacular, something that anyone could own. So, you can have your own personal R2-D2-C3PO. And I think at scale, this would cost something like, I don't know, $20,000, $30,000, probably less than a car is my prediction, long-term. It'll take us a minute to get to the long term. But fundamentally, at scale, the Optimus robot, you should be able to buy an Optimus robot for, I think, probably $20,000 to $30,000, long-term. And what can it do? It'll basically do anything you want. It can be a teacher or babysit your kids, it can walk your dog, mow your lawn, get the groceries, just be your friend, serve drinks whatever you can think of, it will do. And, yeah, it's going to be awesome. I think this will be the biggest product ever of any kind, because I think everyone of the 8 billion people of Earth, I think everyone's going to want their Optimus buddy. And there's going to be maybe two. And then, they'll be producing products and services. I predict, actually, provided we address risks of digital superintelligence, 80% probability of good outcome, look on the bright side, the cup is 80% full, the cost of products and services will decline dramatically. And basically, anyone will be able to have any products and services they want. It will be an age of abundance the likes of which people have not, almost no one has envisioned. It will be something special. So now, one of the things we wanted to show tonight was that Optimus is not a canned video. It's not walled off. The Optimus robots will walk among you. Please, please be nice to the Optimus robots. You'll be able to walk right up to them and they'll serve drinks at the bar. I mean, it's a wild experience just to have humanoid robots and they're there, you're just in front of you. So yeah, with that, let's party!

FULL TRANSCRIPT OF ELON'S CYBERCAB AND ROBOVAN PRESENTATION 00:00 Welcome 01:16 Cybercab & Future of transportation 04:33 Cost 05:53 Timeline 07:13 Self-driving technology 10:05 Inductive charging 10:24 The cities of the future 11:04 Robovan 12:13 Optimus Welcome Welcome to the We, Robot party. We have quite a show for you tonight. I think you're going to like it. As you can see, I just arrived in the Robotaxi, the Cybercab. And there's 20 more where that came from. So they've been traveling, there's no people in them. As you can see, the car is just going by with no people. We have 50 fully autonomous cars here tonight. So you'll see model Y's and the Cybercabs, all driverless. You'll be able to take a ride in the Cybercab. There's no steering wheel or pedals. So I hope this goes well, we'll find out. You see a lot of sci-fi movies where the future is dark and dismal, where it's not a future you want to be in. So, you know, I love Blade Runner, but I don't know if we want that future. We want that duster he's wearing, but not the bleak apocalypse. We want to have a fun, exciting future that, if you could look in a crystal ball and see the future, you'd be like, yes, I wish I could be there now. That's what we want. Cybercab & Future of transportation So, when we think about transport today, there's a lot of pain that we take for granted, that we think is normal. Like having to drive around LA in 3 hours of traffic. Yeah, people that live in LA, I mean, you know, try to get from Pasadena to El Segundo during rush hour. You can fly to another city faster than you can get to LA. And you have to drive the whole way, unless you're in a Tesla. Of course, our Tesla already does quite well at this supervised self-driving. So, supervised full self-driving is actually working quite well. I'm sure there's people in the crowd who are using that. So, we'll move from supervised full self-driving to unsupervised full self-driving where the car, you could fall asleep and wake up at your destination. But there's also a challenge for a lot of people that cars cost too much. I mean, when you factor in everything that goes into a car and the car insurance and the car payments, storage of the car, it's very expensive. You say, like, how many hours a week are cars used? Your average passenger car is only used about 10 hours a week out of 168 hours. So, the vast majority of the time cars are just doing nothing. But if they're autonomous, they could be used, I don't know, five times more, maybe ten times more. So you could actually, for the same car, would have five times as much value, maybe ten times as much value. There's 168 hours in the week, and like I said, only ten of them are used for driving. And then, a bunch of those hours are looking for a parking spot, which can be pretty annoying at times. So, with autonomy, you get your time back. This is a very big deal. So it's not just, it'll save lives, like a lot of lives and prevent injuries. I think we'll see autonomous cars become ten times safer than a human. I mean, if you think of times past where there used to be an elevator operator in every elevator but once in a while, they get tired and accidentally shear somebody in half. Now, we have automated elevators. You just get an elevator and you press a button and you don't even think about it and it just takes you to the floor. And if you did see an elevator operator with a big relay switch, you'd be like, that's weird. That's how cars will be. And it's not just the lives saved in injuries, but if you think about the cumulative time that people spend in a car and the time that they will get back that they can now spend, well, I guess, on their phones or watching a movie or doing work or whatever you want to do you can think of the car in autonomous world as being like just little lounge. You're just sitting in a comfortable little lounge and you can do whatever you want while you're in this comfortable little lounge. And when you get out, you will be at your destination. So, yeah, it's gonna be awesome. Cost So, in fact, I think the cost of autonomous transport will be so low that you can think of it like individualized mass transit. The average cost of a bus per mile for a city, not the ticket price, because that is subsidized, but the average price is about a dollar a mile, whereas the cost of Cybercab we think probably over time, the operating cost is probably going to be around twenty cents a mile. Including taxes and everything else, it probably ends up being 30 or 40 cents a mile. And you will be able to buy one. And we expect the cost to be below $30,000. And I think there'll be an interesting business model where, let's say somebody is an Uber or Lyft driver today where they can actually sort of manage a fleet of cars and like, sort of manage, I don't know, 10, 20 cars and just take care of them. Like a shepherd tends their flock. You have a little flock of cars and you're the shepherd and you take care of your flock of cars. I think that would be pretty cool. I think it's going to be a glorious future. It's going to be really something special. Timeline We do expect actually to start fully autonomous unsupervised FSD in Texas and California next year. And that's obviously, that's with the Model 3 and Model Y. And then we expect to be in production with the Cybercab, which is really highly optimized for autonomous transport in probably, I tend to be a little optimistic with time frames, but in 2026. So, yeah, before 2027, let me put it that way. And we'll make this vehicle in very high volume. But well, before that, you will experience a robotic taxi via the Model 3 and Model Y program and model S and X, too. But the Model 3 and Y will achieve unsupervised full self-driving with permission, in wherever regulators essentially approve it. In the US, and then to follow outside the US. And Cybertruck, too. All our cars are basically, all cars that we make. Let's not get nuanced here. Self-driving technology One of the reasons why the computer can be so much better than a person is that we have millions of cars that are training on driving. It's like living millions of lives simultaneously and seeing very unusual situations that a person in their entire lifetime would not see. With that amount of training data, it's obviously going to be much better than what a human could be because you can't live a million lives. And it's also, it can see in all directions simultaneously and it doesn't get tired or text or any of those things. So, it will naturally be, like I said 10, 20, 30 times safer than a human, just for all those reasons. And I want to emphasize that the solution that we have is, AI and vision. So, there's no expensive equipment needed. The Model 3 and Model Y and S and X that we make today will be capable of full autonomy, unsupervised. And that means that our cost of producing the vehicle is low. Now, we are going to actually over-spec the computer for the Cybercab. So, our AI 5 computer will be somewhat over-spec'd because I think there's actually also an opportunity, sort of like an Amazon Web Services, where if the car is driving for 50 hours a week, there's still over 100 hours left and there's a potential there to have a massive amount of distributed inference compute, where if you've got like a fleet of 100 million vehicles and a kilowatt of efficient inference compute, you have 100 gigawatts of compute, which is really quite substantial. And if it's there, you might as well use it so that I think will make sense. So, our autonomous future is here. As I said, we've got 50 Teslas driving autonomously. We're trying to give you a sense of what cities will be like in the future. And when you get in, you'll see like, it's really quite a wild experience to just be in a car with no steering wheel, no pedals, no controls, and it feels great. So we have enough vehicles here, so everyone should be able to try it out and experience the set that we've built here. It's a very big set. So it's like really we've used I don't know, 20, 30 acres or something like that. It's really big. So, it goes on, the ride's long. And we set it up to feel like a ride, like a park ride. So, it'll be cool and you'll get to experience it tonight. Inductive charging Something we're also doing is and it's really high time we did this is inductive charging. So, the robotaxi has no plug. It just goes over the inductive charger and charges. So, yeah, it's kind of how it should be. The cities of the future One of the things that is really interesting is how will this affect the cities that we live in. And when you drive around a city, or when the car drives you around the city, you'll see there's a lot of parking lots. There's parking lots everywhere, parking garages. What would happen if you have an autonomous world is that you can now turn parking lots into parks. And so, from we're taking the inglot out of parking lot. You're welcome. So, there's a lot of opportunity to create green space in the cities that we live in. So, like, that would be quite fantastic. Robovan Oh, and also, what happens if you need a vehicle that is bigger than a Model Y? The Robovan. We're going to make this and it's going to look like that. Now, can you imagine going down the streets and you see this coming towards you? That'd be sick. So this can carry up to 20 people, and it can also transport goods. You can configure it for goods transport within a city. Or transport of up to 20 people at a time. The Robovan is what's gonna solve for high density. If you want to take a sports team somewhere or you're looking to really get the cost of travel down to, I don't know, 5, 10 cents a mile, then you can use the Robovan. One of the things we want to do, and we've seen this with the Cybertruck, is we want to change the look of the roads. The future should look like the future. Optimus Speaking of robots. Everything we've developed for our cars, the batteries, power electronics, the advanced motors, gearboxes, the software, the AI inference computer, it all actually applies to a humanoid robot. The same techniques. It's just a robot with arms and legs instead of a robot with wheels. We've made a lot of progress with Optimus. And as you can see, we started up with someone in a robot suit. And then, we've progressed dramatically, year after year. So, if you extrapolate this, you're really going to have something spectacular, something that anyone could own. So, you can have your own personal R2-D2-C3PO. And I think at scale, this would cost something like, I don't know, $20,000, $30,000, probably less than a car is my prediction, long-term. It'll take us a minute to get to the long term. But fundamentally, at scale, the Optimus robot, you should be able to buy an Optimus robot for, I think, probably $20,000 to $30,000, long-term. And what can it do? It'll basically do anything you want. It can be a teacher or babysit your kids, it can walk your dog, mow your lawn, get the groceries, just be your friend, serve drinks whatever you can think of, it will do. And, yeah, it's going to be awesome. I think this will be the biggest product ever of any kind, because I think everyone of the 8 billion people of Earth, I think everyone's going to want their Optimus buddy. And there's going to be maybe two. And then, they'll be producing products and services. I predict, actually, provided we address risks of digital superintelligence, 80% probability of good outcome, look on the bright side, the cup is 80% full, the cost of products and services will decline dramatically. And basically, anyone will be able to have any products and services they want. It will be an age of abundance the likes of which people have not, almost no one has envisioned. It will be something special. So now, one of the things we wanted to show tonight was that Optimus is not a canned video. It's not walled off. The Optimus robots will walk among you. Please, please be nice to the Optimus robots. You'll be able to walk right up to them and they'll serve drinks at the bar. I mean, it's a wild experience just to have humanoid robots and they're there, you're just in front of you. So yeah, with that, let's party!

Mario Nawfal

241,051 views • 1 year ago

Anya's babies were born here on 10th June, so they're 3.5 weeks old now. This is the exact age that most 'abandoned' babies come into rescue, and here's why. It's 6.30am, the sun is up and it's daylight so mum has gone to bed for the day, (but it's still a bit too dark in the hospital for the cameras). She's in her own nest, away from her babies. She's left her precious babies sleeping safely in the maternity nest for the day, to encourage their transition from diurnal to nocturnal, and to wean them off daytime feeds from her. But for one little baby who should be asleep, it's just too exciting having ears and eyes that work, and teeth that are starting to erupt. He just can't wait. So with mum away, he sneaks out to have a little explore... All what you see here is happening in the safety of the mother and baby unit here at the hospital. But now imagine this happening in the wild. How easy it is for the baby to take the wrong turn. For mum not to hear. For a human to come and pick the baby up before mum has a chance to retrieve him. This is why it's so important that the first thing you do when you see a tiny baby out is to stop, stand still, keep your eyes on him from a distance, and ring a good rescue for advice. They will ask all the right questions and will be able to remotely assess the situation, and advise what actions, if any, need to be taken. Put the number of your local trusted hedgehog rescue in your phone now, ready, just in case.🥰

Anya's babies were born here on 10th June, so they're 3.5 weeks old now. This is the exact age that most 'abandoned' babies come into rescue, and here's why. It's 6.30am, the sun is up and it's daylight so mum has gone to bed for the day, (but it's still a bit too dark in the hospital for the cameras). She's in her own nest, away from her babies. She's left her precious babies sleeping safely in the maternity nest for the day, to encourage their transition from diurnal to nocturnal, and to wean them off daytime feeds from her. But for one little baby who should be asleep, it's just too exciting having ears and eyes that work, and teeth that are starting to erupt. He just can't wait. So with mum away, he sneaks out to have a little explore... All what you see here is happening in the safety of the mother and baby unit here at the hospital. But now imagine this happening in the wild. How easy it is for the baby to take the wrong turn. For mum not to hear. For a human to come and pick the baby up before mum has a chance to retrieve him. This is why it's so important that the first thing you do when you see a tiny baby out is to stop, stand still, keep your eyes on him from a distance, and ring a good rescue for advice. They will ask all the right questions and will be able to remotely assess the situation, and advise what actions, if any, need to be taken. Put the number of your local trusted hedgehog rescue in your phone now, ready, just in case.🥰

Hedgehog Cabin

22,667 views • 14 days ago

1. When hibye, orm found that fans didn't take their mobile phones. She immediately stopped and communicated with the staff. This link allowed fans to shoot with their mobile phones. 2. Orm noticed that the fan was carrying a particularly heavy thing, so she invited fan to take the elevator together. 3. Orm knew that many fans were out in the rain, so she ran to the fans to remind them to go home quickly. 4. In the fm photo session, orm found that the fans' seats were a little far away from her, and silently moved the chair to her side. 5. Knowing that there was some chaos in Korea at that time, orm specially told Korean fans in English "go home safely, okay?" 6. Orm knows about every tweet and sends tweets to encourage fans. 7. Knowing that China is suffering from a typhoon, orm specially sent Weibo to care about Chinese fans at late night. 8. Worried that fans is too hot, let ch3 turn on the air conditioner. 9. Almost every activity ends with a tweet or Weibo thanking the fans. 10. She has always cherished every fan's support, punching in every time as much as possible, and if she can't go because of work, she will also ask papa and utt to help bring the support home. I am honored to be an omelette.🍳 2ND ANNIV WITH ORMLETTE #ไข่เจียวของออมเล็ต2ขวบแล้ว

1. When hibye, orm found that fans didn't take their mobile phones. She immediately stopped and communicated with the staff. This link allowed fans to shoot with their mobile phones. 2. Orm noticed that the fan was carrying a particularly heavy thing, so she invited fan to take the elevator together. 3. Orm knew that many fans were out in the rain, so she ran to the fans to remind them to go home quickly. 4. In the fm photo session, orm found that the fans' seats were a little far away from her, and silently moved the chair to her side. 5. Knowing that there was some chaos in Korea at that time, orm specially told Korean fans in English "go home safely, okay?" 6. Orm knows about every tweet and sends tweets to encourage fans. 7. Knowing that China is suffering from a typhoon, orm specially sent Weibo to care about Chinese fans at late night. 8. Worried that fans is too hot, let ch3 turn on the air conditioner. 9. Almost every activity ends with a tweet or Weibo thanking the fans. 10. She has always cherished every fan's support, punching in every time as much as possible, and if she can't go because of work, she will also ask papa and utt to help bring the support home. I am honored to be an omelette.🍳 2ND ANNIV WITH ORMLETTE #ไข่เจียวของออมเล็ต2ขวบแล้ว

Monkey🐒

17,968 views • 10 months ago

Yesterday, Ian Whiffin confirmed what Richard Green/the #KarenRead defense said in Trial 1, thus confirming that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview 3 minutes & 1 second before the Commonwealth’s GPS/location data points show: “[The monotonic clock] is not a clock that can be trusted to see when events occur.” Only the display time is accurate when determining when something actually happened. “All activity is related to that (the display) clock.” “You have to take the values that the monotonic clock provides and add or subtract different values, which are essentially offsets, to get the correct time.” That’s a major problem for the Commonwealth — because Whiffin’s entire Waze location analysis is built on the MONOTONIC TIMESTAMPS! And somehow, neither Whiffin nor Hank Brennan seems to grasp what just happened: They accidentally proved the defense’s theory! Specifically, because the Waze app runs on monotonic time programming and not the display time programming, the timestamps associated with the cached locations from Waze on John’s iPhone are 3 minutes and 1 second fast/ahead, or have a 181 second offset (see attached evidence exhibit from trial 1 with the specific conversions). This means that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview at approximately 12:21:37am, give or take, and not at 12:24:38am as the Commonwealth asserts, as Waze is based off of the monotonic timestamps, not the display clock timestamps. Consequently, this means John arrives at 34 Fairview BEFORE his Apple Health data recorded him taking flights of stairs, which didn’t first occur until 12:22:14am, therefore meaning that approximately 40 seconds after arriving at the house, John O’Keefe first began climbing some stairs. It suddenly becomes a lot harder for the Commonwealth to discredit the reliability of Apple Health data confirming John went inside the house when his location data also put him there. Why would the Commonwealth rely on the wrong timestamps when conducting their 15+ months after the fact GPS/location data analysis? Because it was right after the defense had first made public John O’Keefe’s Apple Health data showing flights of stairs climbed upon John’s arrival at 34 Fairview—thus establishing that he did in fact go inside the house. They needed to keep John out of the house to have any case, so they opted for discrediting the Apple Health data they so regularly rely upon in their criminal prosecutions, while deliberately only looking at John’s phone location data sourced from the one app that uses monotonic time programming without converting those timestamps to the display time (or subtracting the 3 mins. 1 second offset). By exploiting the incorrect monotonic timestamps of the cached Waze location data, the Commonwealth was able to claim that John’s phone location data showed he’d not yet arrived at 34 Fairview by the time his Apple Health data showed him climbing flights of stairs inside the house. To convert any of John O’Keefe’s Waze data that Whiffin presented into real time, you need to subtract 3 full minutes from each monotonic timestamp. So when Whiffin bizarrely testified that John was climbing stairs while driving down Oakdale at 12:22 AM? Yeah — that actually happened at 12:19 AM. And when he claimed Karen pulled up to 34 Fairview at 12:24 AM? That was really at 12:21 AM. Both times perfectly aligned with the Defense’s timeline. Not the Commonwealth’s. And Hank Brennan? Well, he’s got his expert, Ian Whiffin, casually confirming that John O’Keefe was walking into 34 Fairview at 12:21 AM, and climbing stairs at 12:22 AM. At this point, you really have to ask: Are the Commonwealth’s witnesses planning to leave anything for the Defense to rebut? Or are they just going to blow up their own case — one by one? Because this? This is getting insane. #IanWhiffin #Cellebrite #NorfolkCounty #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Yesterday, Ian Whiffin confirmed what Richard Green/the #KarenRead defense said in Trial 1, thus confirming that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview 3 minutes & 1 second before the Commonwealth’s GPS/location data points show: “[The monotonic clock] is not a clock that can be trusted to see when events occur.” Only the display time is accurate when determining when something actually happened. “All activity is related to that (the display) clock.” “You have to take the values that the monotonic clock provides and add or subtract different values, which are essentially offsets, to get the correct time.” That’s a major problem for the Commonwealth — because Whiffin’s entire Waze location analysis is built on the MONOTONIC TIMESTAMPS! And somehow, neither Whiffin nor Hank Brennan seems to grasp what just happened: They accidentally proved the defense’s theory! Specifically, because the Waze app runs on monotonic time programming and not the display time programming, the timestamps associated with the cached locations from Waze on John’s iPhone are 3 minutes and 1 second fast/ahead, or have a 181 second offset (see attached evidence exhibit from trial 1 with the specific conversions). This means that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview at approximately 12:21:37am, give or take, and not at 12:24:38am as the Commonwealth asserts, as Waze is based off of the monotonic timestamps, not the display clock timestamps. Consequently, this means John arrives at 34 Fairview BEFORE his Apple Health data recorded him taking flights of stairs, which didn’t first occur until 12:22:14am, therefore meaning that approximately 40 seconds after arriving at the house, John O’Keefe first began climbing some stairs. It suddenly becomes a lot harder for the Commonwealth to discredit the reliability of Apple Health data confirming John went inside the house when his location data also put him there. Why would the Commonwealth rely on the wrong timestamps when conducting their 15+ months after the fact GPS/location data analysis? Because it was right after the defense had first made public John O’Keefe’s Apple Health data showing flights of stairs climbed upon John’s arrival at 34 Fairview—thus establishing that he did in fact go inside the house. They needed to keep John out of the house to have any case, so they opted for discrediting the Apple Health data they so regularly rely upon in their criminal prosecutions, while deliberately only looking at John’s phone location data sourced from the one app that uses monotonic time programming without converting those timestamps to the display time (or subtracting the 3 mins. 1 second offset). By exploiting the incorrect monotonic timestamps of the cached Waze location data, the Commonwealth was able to claim that John’s phone location data showed he’d not yet arrived at 34 Fairview by the time his Apple Health data showed him climbing flights of stairs inside the house. To convert any of John O’Keefe’s Waze data that Whiffin presented into real time, you need to subtract 3 full minutes from each monotonic timestamp. So when Whiffin bizarrely testified that John was climbing stairs while driving down Oakdale at 12:22 AM? Yeah — that actually happened at 12:19 AM. And when he claimed Karen pulled up to 34 Fairview at 12:24 AM? That was really at 12:21 AM. Both times perfectly aligned with the Defense’s timeline. Not the Commonwealth’s. And Hank Brennan? Well, he’s got his expert, Ian Whiffin, casually confirming that John O’Keefe was walking into 34 Fairview at 12:21 AM, and climbing stairs at 12:22 AM. At this point, you really have to ask: Are the Commonwealth’s witnesses planning to leave anything for the Defense to rebut? Or are they just going to blow up their own case — one by one? Because this? This is getting insane. #IanWhiffin #Cellebrite #NorfolkCounty #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

179,619 views • 1 year ago

The Mainstream Media can’t be trusted There's been a lot of comments on social media from people who want to support our party but are hesitant to as they feel we won't get anywhere because we don't have the support of the mainstream media. If you want to change our political system the worst thing you could do is to continue to vote for parties supported by the mainstream media. Why would you trust the mainstream media when they have pushed Covid change and Covid onto you in the past. Take recents events where Australia's richest person and biggest political donar has come out and suggested that Australia gives free land and tax breaks to foreign countries and the world's richest man. There has been complete silence on this and the reason is simple. Gina Rinehart buys a lot of advertising space and the mainstream media don't want to upset their biggest customers. The fact that the People First has been gaslighted by the mainstream media is the very reason you should support us. We don't drink the establishment cool-aid and for that reason the mainstream media ignores us. Our founding fathers set up a democratic system designed to support minority parties. They did this by firstly allowing preferential voting and secondly making the Senate a house based on proportional voting not 2PP. They knew the dangers of entrenched rule by established parties and wanted to ensure minor parties would hold the major parties to account. Accountability is a fundamental part of democracy. Don't be dissuaded in supporting us just because the MSM aren't on our side. It's all the more reason we need your support to hold the establishment to account. Under our preference system you can still choose the order in which you vote for other parties. If you vote for the People's Party your vote won't be wasted. In fact it will send a signal to the establishment that can't control the narrative. To keep the bastards honest please sign up today at

The Mainstream Media can’t be trusted There's been a lot of comments on social media from people who want to support our party but are hesitant to as they feel we won't get anywhere because we don't have the support of the mainstream media. If you want to change our political system the worst thing you could do is to continue to vote for parties supported by the mainstream media. Why would you trust the mainstream media when they have pushed Covid change and Covid onto you in the past. Take recents events where Australia's richest person and biggest political donar has come out and suggested that Australia gives free land and tax breaks to foreign countries and the world's richest man. There has been complete silence on this and the reason is simple. Gina Rinehart buys a lot of advertising space and the mainstream media don't want to upset their biggest customers. The fact that the People First has been gaslighted by the mainstream media is the very reason you should support us. We don't drink the establishment cool-aid and for that reason the mainstream media ignores us. Our founding fathers set up a democratic system designed to support minority parties. They did this by firstly allowing preferential voting and secondly making the Senate a house based on proportional voting not 2PP. They knew the dangers of entrenched rule by established parties and wanted to ensure minor parties would hold the major parties to account. Accountability is a fundamental part of democracy. Don't be dissuaded in supporting us just because the MSM aren't on our side. It's all the more reason we need your support to hold the establishment to account. Under our preference system you can still choose the order in which you vote for other parties. If you vote for the People's Party your vote won't be wasted. In fact it will send a signal to the establishment that can't control the narrative. To keep the bastards honest please sign up today at

Gerard Rennick

22,651 views • 27 days ago