正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

elon musk grabbed the source code openai open-sourced by accident, rewrote it in rust over a weekend, and shipped it as a free coding agent that does everything $200/mo chatgpt pro does. why pay $200 to openai and $200 to claude when this runs for $8 the swarm above...

111,684 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

33 条评论

Avid 的头像
Avid1 个月前

Wow, this is amazing! This is really nice. Could you share the repo?

starmex 的头像
starmex1 个月前

article has the repo plus the setup steps fam

DipXHunter 的头像
DipXHunter1 个月前

@grok is it a bullshit?

Apollon Foivos Bakis 的头像
Apollon Foivos Bakis1 个月前

Open source makes agent economics fascinating.

Midblade ⚔️ 的头像
Midblade ⚔️1 个月前

that video is made up bullshit

Gipp 🦅 的头像
Gipp 🦅1 个月前

did you test the kimi backend yet?

starmex 的头像
starmex1 个月前

tested on two repos, holds up. only diff was slightly slower first token

BluntRiser 的头像
BluntRiser1 个月前

Unlock singularity and make usage limits unlimited !

Joshua Winthrop 的头像
Joshua Winthrop1 个月前

@grok is this true?

Emma Rodriguez 的头像
Emma Rodriguez1 个月前

Wild claim, but the bigger trend is real: open AI agents are pushing costs down fast. 🤖

Benjy Wang 的头像
Benjy Wang1 个月前

Graph and node visualizations is my BS filter for AI on X.

Se state 的头像
Se state1 个月前

Most of Elon’s endeavors, I wouldn’t refer to as accidents, but I guess it depends how you look at it as a scientist because sometimes you do learn unintended things along the way

Adel Bucetta 的头像
Adel Bucetta1 个月前

the honest answer is corporations like openai will struggle to adapt because innovation in ai isn't about proprietary code, it's about who can iterate faster and build a better mousetrap

kocer 的头像
kocer1 个月前

wait this free fork really does the same agent work as the 200 dollar seats

beamnxw ./ 的头像
beamnxw ./1 个月前

open source just changed the pricing game

Alden 的头像
Alden1 个月前

Before developing a self actuating trading bot, the author MUST thoroughly understand trading. AI can't replace flawed market logic. It only scales it. Deterministic data. AI trading intelligence. Deterministic execution.

Some Oaths Never End 🇺🇸 的头像
Some Oaths Never End 🇺🇸1 个月前

@grok verify

dunik 的头像
dunik1 个月前

wow, very nice dashboard, looks amazing

sovereign sense 的头像
sovereign sense1 个月前

🤔

Lyle de Groot 的头像
Lyle de Groot1 个月前

Apologies for asking again, but I read the article and cannot see a link to the repo, would you mind positng it here @starmexxx ?

ByteCapital Labs 的头像
ByteCapital Labs1 个月前

why you don't start now i know why just click

Jimmy h. AV. 的头像
Jimmy h. AV.1 个月前

Es el clásico formato de hype exagerado para acaparar interacciones en X....Mitomania parece un virus universal todos mienten por atraer atención.

Knight Todd 的头像
Knight Todd1 个月前

Organizations adopting artificial intelligence typically succeed when they integrate it into broader strategic goals over the next decade.

Ares 的头像
Ares1 个月前

This is pure genius 🔥 Dropping $400 stacks to $8 with Musk’s free fork is exactly the kind of move we needed.

Dan 的头像
Dan1 个月前

Cool

Finer 的头像
Finer1 个月前

Crazy how fast AI tools are evolving

Donkey Unicorn 的头像
Donkey Unicorn1 个月前

@grok fact check please

kelvin 的头像
kelvin1 个月前

Thanks for sharing this Mann

leopardracer 的头像
leopardracer1 个月前

I saved this

Ashlynso J 的头像
Ashlynso J1 个月前

No he didnt. Shit the fuxk up You grifter

rewind 的头像
rewind1 个月前

bro turned the license into the product

Charlie.ask 的头像
Charlie.ask1 个月前

IPO investors beware

Bored AOC | Totally Fake BTCH 的头像
Bored AOC | Totally Fake BTCH1 个月前

@grok this tru?

相关视频

a screenshot from openai's internal slack leaked last night, and sam altman is telling his own staff to stop comparing gpt-6 astra to the free models "in writing." when the ceo bans the comparison, the comparison is already over. the leaked line is one sentence: do not benchmark astra against open weights in any channel. you do not ban a fight you are winning. altman just told 4,000 employees the free model caught up, and one of them told the internet. here is the comparison he did not want on the record, and it runs local for about $6 instead of $400: -> pull an open model like grok or kimi k3, the exact ones altman just barred his own team from benchmarking, and load it onto one nvidia card -> point cursor, cline and every app at localhost, and none of them notice they stopped paying for astra -> keep the heavy jobs on a rented gpu by the hour and the daily work fully offline for the cost of power -> your $200 chatgpt seat and your $200 claude seat both go dark, and no memo can put that back here is the part they will fight me on: openai and anthropic are not banning the benchmark because it is wrong, they are banning it because it is right. the day a lab tells its own people to stop measuring, the $200 stops buying a better model and starts buying the silence around a tie. drop your $400 stack to a $6 local model and run the comparison altman deleted from his own slack. the full benchmark is in the article below, save it before it gets "clarified."

starmex

24,200 次观看 • 28 天前

elon musk started with 7 grok agents. by morning each had spawned somewhere between 80 and 900 more on its own, and no one had told them to multiply. openai and anthropic each sell you one agent that sits still for $400. this whole self-building swarm runs for $5 the swarm above is that overnight run, seven seeds that turned into thousands, every one of them working a slice of the same job with nobody at the keyboard here is the exact setup, and it costs nothing on top of a $5 key: -> spin up one grok agent and give it a standing order instead of a prompt: own a boring niche people search every day -> it reads x and reddit complaints in real time and picks the one nobody wants but everybody googles, because it is grok and it sees the whole app -> when the work outgrows it, it spawns its own helpers, 80 to 900 of them, and splits the site between them -> they build it on their own machines and ship 3 to 6 useful pages a night, on a routine you set once -> the swarm writes, negotiates and closes its own affiliate and referral deals by email, in your name, at 3am -> telegram sends you the money report and you never open the site -> month one is traffic, month three the first $237 lands, and it does not stop after that the whole time, opus 5 and gpt-5.6 are still sitting frozen, waiting for you to type the next message. one is a swarm that builds its own workforce and its own income while you sleep, the other is a $200 chat you have to drive by hand drop your $400/mo stack to $5, and bookmark this before someone's swarm spawns another 600 pages into the niche you would have owned. the full playbook is in the article below

starmex

98,444 次观看 • 1 个月前

Someone just posted the full blueprint for an AI swarm that does the job of a 200-person quant research team. Six agents. Running 24/7. Finding brand-new alpha while you sleep. Citadel needs 100 PhDs to do this. Two Sigma needs 200. This does it with six bots and one laptop. Two ways to play this - spend a weekend building your own swarm, or copy the wallet of one that's already up $2M: Boris Cherny runs Claude Code at Anthropic. Two weeks ago he said: "I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude. My job is to write loops" Alpha research is just a pipeline. So instead of sitting in it, you hand each stage to its own agent: > one reads every new research paper overnight and pulls out the trade idea > one builds the features and cleans the data > one backtests it over 20 years, costs and slippage included > one runs the hard stats and kills anything overfit > one checks it still works in every market regime > one strips out plain momentum and value to see if any real edge is left Each of those six is a job a fund pays a $600,000-a-year quant to do. He runs all six for the price of an API bill. The rule that makes it work: the agent that builds a signal never gets to approve it. A separate, stronger agent tries to kill it first. Whatever survives all six by morning is real, new alpha. One trader's already running this exact swarm on Polymarket. That $2M wallet is public, every trade on-chain. The full build is in the post below - six agents, the tool that runs them, and the five mistakes that kill most people. Bookmark & read this before it's buried.

cvxv666

104,237 次观看 • 3 个月前

HERMES AGENT VS OPENCLAW. a local ai onboarding flow test. a 3.9gb bonsai served on localhost, both agents upstream and latest, i point each one at the endpoint and watch which one even finds it. > hermes opens a provider menu, thirty plus options, local servers sitting right there next to the cloud ones, i hand it 127.0.0.1:8899, it verifies the endpoint, one model visible, auto-detects the model by name, bonsai-27b-q1_0, reads the context length straight off the server, saves it, and starts reasoning and firing real tool calls on my local model. no key. no friction. > openclaw has no menu. it goes hunting for a codex login, an openai key, finds none because there are none, prints no models available three times, defaults to openai/gpt-5.5, a cloud model it cannot reach, and dead ends on run auth login --provider openai. read that back. it asked me for an openai key. to run a model already running on my own machine. it never once looked at localhost. to be fair, openclaw can run local if you hand wire endpoint yourself. what it will not do is find the model already sitting on your box. hermes agent found it in one line. now the part i owe you. the auto-detect that just won, the model name read, the .gguf strip, the context length probe off the server, that is my code, it is in hermes agent main right now, authorship preserved, #2051 and #4218. the wizard fix that stops an agent from silently routing you to someone else's creds, the exact trap openclaw still falls into, mine too, #4210. i contribute to hermes agent, i told you that going in. one agent is built to talk to whatever you are running, the other is built to talk to a cloud api, so one found my model and ran it and the other asked me to log into openai. onboarding flow of both, mapped, below.

Sudo su

23,816 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 Claude Code costs $200/month. GitHub Copilot costs $19/month. Jack Dorsey's company built a free alternative. 35,000 GitHub stars. It's called Goose. An open source AI agent built by Block that goes beyond code suggestions. It installs, executes, edits, and tests. With any LLM you choose. Not autocomplete. Not suggestions. A full autonomous agent that takes actions on your computer. No vendor lock-in. No monthly subscription. Bring your own model. Here's what Goose does: → Works with ANY LLM. Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, DeepSeek, Ollama. Your choice. → Reads and understands your entire codebase → Writes, edits, and refactors code across multiple files → Runs shell commands and installs dependencies → Executes and debugs your code automatically → Extensible through MCP. Connect it to any external tool. → Desktop app, CLI, and web interface. Pick your workflow. → Written in Rust. Fast. Lightweight. No bloat. Here's the wildest part: Block is a $40 billion company. They built Cash App, Square, and TIDAL. They use Goose internally. Then they open sourced the entire thing. This isn't a side project from a random developer. This is production-grade tooling from a company that processes billions in payments. Built for their own engineers. Given to everyone. Claude Code: $200/month. Locked to Claude. GitHub Copilot: $19/month. Locked to GitHub. Cursor: $20/month. Locked to their editor. Goose: Free. Any LLM. Any editor. Any workflow. Forever. 35.3K GitHub stars. 3.3K forks. 4,078 commits. Built by Block. 100% Open Source. Apache 2.0 License.

Nav Toor

395,329 次观看 • 6 个月前

OpenAI. said. this. publicly. their own engineers just proved one idea on themselves, in writing: stop telling AI what's wrong. hand it the whole broken thing and let it find out they gave GPT-6 Astra a slow test build of their own coding tool. one cause found, a memory bottleneck, one allocator swapped, every turn 25× faster this is GPT-6 Astra, the layer that fixes the cause instead of the symptom, $0 on top of the ChatGPT plan you already pay for: - open ChatGPT or Codex, pick GPT-6 Astra, hand it the whole thing: the folder, the file that takes a minute to open. it works in apps with no API and reads your screen - type one sentence: find the one cause, prove it, fix it, do not patch around it - leave the room. it asks without stopping, keeps working on what does not need your answer, waits only where the answer changes the outcome - keep it in one Codex session with the experimental notes setting on: it remembers across context windows why an earlier fix failed - expect the first pass to land: handed a program with no source, it worked out how it runs 88% of the time first try, 99.2% within four you never find out what was broken. it gets fixed anyway the catch is on the same page. roughly 30% more memory for that speed, and the safety checks can pause a long job until you approve the next step describing the problem was the expensive half of fixing it. that half just ended every hour you spend explaining the symptom to a chat window, someone else has handed theirs over whole bookmark this before the next thing breaks, the playbook for handing a whole job to an AI worker is in the piece below ↓

Argona

109,831 次观看 • 1 个月前