Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Elon Musk is warning about an “exponentially increasing risk” from artificial intelligence and calling on major tech competitors to test and peer-review one another’s security models. Speaking at the All-In Summit in Los Angeles, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO echoed growing concerns about AI safety. He’s urging leading AI...

141,957 просмотров • 15 часов назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 30

Фото профиля Fox News
Fox News15 часов назад

Read more about the debate of AI:

Фото профиля Nat Nollid (PlanetCommonSense.Com)
Nat Nollid (PlanetCommonSense.Com)15 часов назад

Remember the millennium bug? 2000? Billions spent Was a scam Same with nuclear weapons Armageddon Didn’t happen Not a kill switch but what musk is forgetting is All AI needs mega power to function You just switch that off AI is dead 💀 Universe is watching #AI #AIS

Фото профиля JUDICIAL COUP S + 🔜
JUDICIAL COUP S + 🔜15 часов назад

Imagine that - cross industry auditing prior to governmental control? What a concept

Фото профиля Choking-on-Gnats
Choking-on-Gnats15 часов назад

Musk won't mention AI safe guards for his buddies in China Russia India Why? One reason safeguarding cost USA consumers money and Musk wants USA consumers to buy Chinese or Indian from his companies Elon isn't for US business or consumers

Фото профиля Lindsey Bobbitt
Lindsey Bobbitt15 часов назад

What happened the day all of the ai stopped working? What was that like a week ago ish?!

Фото профиля Pay Attention
Pay Attention15 часов назад

Not a bad idea but he’s all over the place on AI risk. Years ago he was one of the first to sound the AI Risk alarms. Then he went all into AI. Last week he said “doomer” concerns were a psyop only then back Anthopic’s pacing approach. Now he back to full blown warnings. I think the risk is real, but he should be consistent.

Фото профиля Super Dave Raines™
Super Dave Raines™15 часов назад

The Creator God (Elohim) created man; man created AI. Ultimately, then, the Lord Jesus Christ created both. I say we apply the Genesis Standard to AI and to every industry on this planet. Every individual and every industry must adhere to the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ. Problem solved.

Фото профиля SpiritChaser MAGA 🇺🇸❤️
SpiritChaser MAGA 🇺🇸❤️15 часов назад

We have no choice. We need to win 🥇

Фото профиля Errol Meade
Errol Meade15 часов назад

Why are technocratic billionaires all right wingers now? Because they are evil and want to take over the planet.

Фото профиля Raja Umar
Raja Umar15 часов назад

Imagine that cross industry auditing prior to government control .what a concept

Фото профиля Chloe Thompson™
Chloe Thompson™15 часов назад

This is one area where the AI industry should absolutely work together.if companies are building increasingly powerful models,why not have competitors try to break each other’s safety systems?What could go wrong by waiting?

Фото профиля R Benjamin
R Benjamin15 часов назад

Finally, a concern tied to action. At least @elonmusk ’s warning isn’t fearmongering slop. Peer-reviewed security sounds like the most productive use of tribal knowledge.

Фото профиля Connect Despirit
Connect Despirit15 часов назад

musk our guy

Фото профиля GY.ARAB
GY.ARAB15 часов назад

Is here traders

Фото профиля Peku Ite
Peku Ite15 часов назад

"AI is a Garbage In, Garbage Out type of system (GIGO) It cannot think or reason, and therefore cannot learn. So it's inherently incapable of doing what collectivists claim, they know that but they need to co-opt you to believe otherwise.

Фото профиля Joel Latchin
Joel Latchin15 часов назад

The entire washington-based Democrat Party with Joe Biden disrespected our entire country letting in 20 million illegal aliens. A couple of hundred people deciding what 350 million people have to go through. Unforgivable. Vote for that again?

Фото профиля Liberty Ledger
Liberty Ledger15 часов назад

The AI race can’t become a race to the bottom on safety. Test everything. Red-team everything. Peer-review everything. The stakes are simply too high.

Фото профиля Mahesh wadhavne
Mahesh wadhavne15 часов назад

Elon Musk Says We Have To Control AI As Soon As Possible Otherwise That's Day Not A Long Whenever AI Will Control Us & Elon Warnes Before The AI's Strom Coming Intensively To Controll Humen Capabilities.

Фото профиля Alina Bella
Alina Bella15 часов назад

What are the dangers besides mass surveillance and data collection?

Фото профиля EDGE OF TRUTH
EDGE OF TRUTH15 часов назад

AI safety should be a shared responsibility. Independent testing, transparency, and peer review can help identify risks early and make powerful technology safer for everyone.

Фото профиля Connect Despirit
Connect Despirit15 часов назад

let win the collab

Фото профиля Martin Luther zip
Martin Luther zip15 часов назад

Mutual red-teaming is the minimum. Every frontier lab should have to survive the other labs’ security harnesses before wide deployment. The race is real. Pretending safety can stay in-house is how you get surprises nobody can walk back.

Фото профиля Mitsuyasu
Mitsuyasu15 часов назад

Musk*, directed by Oscar winner Alex Gibney, has a runtime of 3hours and 45minutes. According to a review by *The Hollywood Reporter*, the film traces Musk's career from its early days through his tenure in the Trump administration, portraying him as a "grand megalomaniac."

Фото профиля Graham Hughes
Graham Hughes15 часов назад

Shockingly I actually agree with Musk on something 🧐

Фото профиля Erin Kowalska
Erin Kowalska15 часов назад

The entire Democratic Party centered in Washington and including Joe Biden allowed 20 million illegal immigrants to enter the country

Фото профиля Crushed Between
Crushed Between15 часов назад

Testing each other's models is something you can audit. At work I see which tools got reviewed and which just shipped.

Фото профиля Connect Despirit
Connect Despirit15 часов назад

ok all is all

Фото профиля Abigail Van Neely
Abigail Van Neely15 часов назад

That’s actually a reasonable point. With AI advancing so quickly, having major companies independently test and challenge each other’s safety systems could help identify weaknesses before they become serious problems.

Фото профиля Clive Pettigrew
Clive Pettigrew15 часов назад

AI companies peer-reviewing one another’s safety models: excellent. It is comforting to know the foxes have finally agreed on a standard for henhouse governance.

Фото профиля Alina Bella
Alina Bella15 часов назад

And you would have everyone’s competitive information 🤷‍♀️

Похожие видео

Elon Musk says the only people qualified to police a frontier AI model are the competitors trying to beat it: "My recommendation to Demis, because I talked to him for a few hours before he published his piece, was that the most immediate thing that we could do is to have the leading AI companies at least just meet or have some sort of call once every few weeks and just discuss safety and security issues." "That's where I think the competitors can keep each other honest." "I think it's quite difficult for someone in the government who doesn't have a deep technical understanding and isn't driving the frontier of AI to know whether something should be released or not." "However, the competitors, if given sort of a week or two to review a new model, can highlight issues. All the competitors have an incentive to keep the others honest." "So you'd have a system where the model makers would check each other's work." "That would be the moment for government to step in and take action." He has a point. The people building these models are just about the only ones who can tell how dangerous one really is. A regulator who has never trained a model cannot make that call. Will rivals reviewing rivals hold up over time? Nobody knows. It has never been tried. And the alternative today is nothing. No calls between the labs, no review windows, nobody outside a lab looking at a model before it ships. So run the reviews. Even an imperfect check beats what exists now, and it would be the first real piece of the assurance layer that still has to be built. Source: Elon Musk (Elon Musk), CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, on The Economist (The Economist). P.S. That missing assurance layer is what the AI Assurance & Governance Summit 2026 is being built around. On October 1 at the Stanford Faculty Club in Palo Alto, brings frontier labs, regulated industries, insurers, investors, and researchers into one single-track room for exactly this question. Register here:

Karl Mehta

29,709 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

AI models currently have a 50% chance of doing something that takes a human expert one hour. This doubles every 7 months. In 2 years? They could automate full workdays. In 4 years? A full month. I discuss the most important graph in AI today with Beth Barnes, the CEO of METR, which uncovered this rule of AI progress. Her bottom line: "It really doesn't seem like 2 years would be surprising for recursively self-improving AI." Beth also explains: where company safety testing fails, why there are no true closed-weight models, AI undermines leading powers, why she's come around on open weighting, and why models might be about to start playing dumb much more often. Enjoy! Available on the 80,000 Hours Podcast in all apps. Links below. 1:51 Can we see AI scheming in the chain of thought? 12:50 Alignment faking 17:33 We have to test models before they're even used inside AI companies 31:56 Each 7 months models can do tasks twice as long 51:31 METR's research finds AIs are solid at AI research already 58:18 AI may turn out to be strong at novel and creative research 1:07:55 Recursively self-improving AI might even be here in two years 1:14:29 Could evaluations backfire? 1:39:55 Do we need external auditors doing AI safety tests? 1:54:09 Why not work at AI companies 2:08:40 The new more dire situation has forced changes to METR's strategy 2:21:49 Overrated: Interpretability research 2:32:55 Overrated: Major AI companies' contributions to safety research 2:39:15 Could we ban using AI to enhance AI, or is that just naive? 2:45:31 Open-weighting models is often good 2:50:22 What we can learn about AGI from the nuclear arms race 3:10:43 AI is more like bioweapons because it undermines the leading power 3:42:09 What research METR plans to do next

Rob Wiblin

93,669 просмотров • 1 год назад