正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Every company problem sounds the same after a while: “Wait… who owns this?” Titles aren’t about ego. They’re about ownership. That’s why Winston Weinberg likes “Head of” at Harvey. It’s explicit. One thing. One owner. No squirming. Multiple owners = dead plants. No owner = dead company. You don’t... show more

Brian Halligan

106,253 subscribers

21,825 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel “You need to spend a lot of time focusing people. This is something I learned from Peter Thiel. He used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it’s insulting to be asked to do just one thing, but Peter would enforce this pretty strictly.” Thiel would say: “I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I’ve assigned to you. I don’t want to hear about how great your doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.” Keith explains: “The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they’re difficult—you don’t wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate… If you have a company that’s always solving B+ problems, you’ll grow and add value, but you’ll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it.” Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel “You need to spend a lot of time focusing people. This is something I learned from Peter Thiel. He used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it’s insulting to be asked to do just one thing, but Peter would enforce this pretty strictly.” Thiel would say: “I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I’ve assigned to you. I don’t want to hear about how great your doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.” Keith explains: “The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they’re difficult—you don’t wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate… If you have a company that’s always solving B+ problems, you’ll grow and add value, but you’ll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it.” Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Startup Archive

81,796 次观看 • 1 年前

Ben Horowitz explains why courage is the most important trait for startup founders “Does the founder have the courage to build the company?… Aristotle said courage is the first virtue, and it’s really important in leadership. Integrity, honesty, and so forth - everybody has them in certain situations. But that’s not the question. The question is if it’s going to cost you your company, do you have your integrity? If it’s going to cost you your job, are you honest? If it’s going to completely embarrass you in front of everybody, do you have it then? The only way you have it then is if you have courage.” Ben continues: “Courage ends up being the foundation for a lot of what we need in an entrepreneur. I always say you need two things. You need great intelligence and great courage. And I always found as an entrepreneur my courage was tested far more than my intelligence. And I think that’s pretty universal.” Video source: Kevin Rose (2012)

Ben Horowitz explains why courage is the most important trait for startup founders “Does the founder have the courage to build the company?… Aristotle said courage is the first virtue, and it’s really important in leadership. Integrity, honesty, and so forth - everybody has them in certain situations. But that’s not the question. The question is if it’s going to cost you your company, do you have your integrity? If it’s going to cost you your job, are you honest? If it’s going to completely embarrass you in front of everybody, do you have it then? The only way you have it then is if you have courage.” Ben continues: “Courage ends up being the foundation for a lot of what we need in an entrepreneur. I always say you need two things. You need great intelligence and great courage. And I always found as an entrepreneur my courage was tested far more than my intelligence. And I think that’s pretty universal.” Video source: Kevin Rose (2012)

Startup Archive

70,720 次观看 • 7 个月前

‘I Won’t Miss a Thing’ is my way of holding on to every laugh, every story, every quiet moment we have. It’s about the beauty in the circle of life about learning to let go while still feeling someone with you, guiding you, protecting you, even after they’re gone. I hope this song helps those who need it, like it did me 🤍

‘I Won’t Miss a Thing’ is my way of holding on to every laugh, every story, every quiet moment we have. It’s about the beauty in the circle of life about learning to let go while still feeling someone with you, guiding you, protecting you, even after they’re gone. I hope this song helps those who need it, like it did me 🤍

Tom Grennan

12,041 次观看 • 1 年前

🦖: Offroad, did you know that I opened a new company for you? 🚗; Huh？ 🦖: I was the one who opened a company for you. A new company. From now on, when there is a job, the money will go into this company, named "Thaweepon somrub Du" 🚗: Huh!? 🦖: (The name is) Thaweepon. Thaweepon for Du. Something like that. Just like that. (Why you making) "huh?" (sound). 🚗: 'Du' what? 🦖: And when you accept a job, the money will pass through my company and you also don't need to pay tax. I will pay it for you. Daou chattering to Offroad about the company he opened 😂😂

🦖: Offroad, did you know that I opened a new company for you? 🚗; Huh？ 🦖: I was the one who opened a company for you. A new company. From now on, when there is a job, the money will go into this company, named "Thaweepon somrub Du" 🚗: Huh!? 🦖: (The name is) Thaweepon. Thaweepon for Du. Something like that. Just like that. (Why you making) "huh?" (sound). 🚗: 'Du' what? 🦖: And when you accept a job, the money will pass through my company and you also don't need to pay tax. I will pay it for you. Daou chattering to Offroad about the company he opened 😂😂

𝓛𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓮 🐻

15,826 次观看 • 1 年前

Brian Kelly on current state of recruiting: "Recruiting, no longer, is just about recruiting. It's no longer just about relationships. "You need a collective, you need the NIL to supplement your recruiting efforts -- and that's just the reality. "You can't close every one of these because of great relationships."

Brian Kelly on current state of recruiting: "Recruiting, no longer, is just about recruiting. It's no longer just about relationships. "You need a collective, you need the NIL to supplement your recruiting efforts -- and that's just the reality. "You can't close every one of these because of great relationships."

SEC Mike

1,612,719 次观看 • 1 年前

One of the biggest mistakes men make is turning this into a confession. “I know it’s weird…” “I’m sorry…” “Please don’t judge me…” You’re framing yourself as a problem before the other person even had a thought about it. You don’t need to force confidence. You don’t need to become arrogant. But you DO need to stop speaking about yourself like you’re defective. That changes the entire interaction. Full video on YouTube if you want the deeper breakdown.

One of the biggest mistakes men make is turning this into a confession. “I know it’s weird…” “I’m sorry…” “Please don’t judge me…” You’re framing yourself as a problem before the other person even had a thought about it. You don’t need to force confidence. You don’t need to become arrogant. But you DO need to stop speaking about yourself like you’re defective. That changes the entire interaction. Full video on YouTube if you want the deeper breakdown.

Command Within | Build Self-Command

21,497 次观看 • 2 个月前

Pokimane responds to rumors about her being a billionaire and reveals how much one of her business's made her “I launched a management and consulting company..I don’t know if I can legally say this.. it’s made at least six figures or more, and that’s the one I’m most proud of.’’

Pokimane responds to rumors about her being a billionaire and reveals how much one of her business's made her “I launched a management and consulting company..I don’t know if I can legally say this.. it’s made at least six figures or more, and that’s the one I’m most proud of.’’

veizau

31,958 次观看 • 3 个月前

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel "Peter Thiel used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it's insulting to be asked to do just one thing. But Peter would enforce this pretty strictly. He'd basically say: 'I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I've assigned to you. I don't want to hear about how great you're doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.'... The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they're difficult--you don't wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate... If you have a company that's always solving B+ problems, you'll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it" Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel "Peter Thiel used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it's insulting to be asked to do just one thing. But Peter would enforce this pretty strictly. He'd basically say: 'I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I've assigned to you. I don't want to hear about how great you're doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.'... The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they're difficult--you don't wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate... If you have a company that's always solving B+ problems, you'll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it" Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Startup Archive

108,875 次观看 • 1 年前

Qullamaggie on The One Who Can Wait the Longest is the One Who’s Going to Win “You have to wait for the big opportunities, and once you’re in a trade, you have to wait. So it’s all about waiting. The one who can wait the longest is the one who’s going to win at this game, and most people are unable to wait. They just cannot wait. They have to do something all the time. That’s why day trading is so popular.”

Qullamaggie on The One Who Can Wait the Longest is the One Who’s Going to Win “You have to wait for the big opportunities, and once you’re in a trade, you have to wait. So it’s all about waiting. The one who can wait the longest is the one who’s going to win at this game, and most people are unable to wait. They just cannot wait. They have to do something all the time. That’s why day trading is so popular.”

Lone

15,427 次观看 • 10 个月前

One thing about a man who doesn't respect you? You will share him with his baby mama by even going to lunches with her even if you don't want to. This relationship is mediocre shem! Girl said NO pictures but the OWNER of the relationship said otherwise.

One thing about a man who doesn't respect you? You will share him with his baby mama by even going to lunches with her even if you don't want to. This relationship is mediocre shem! Girl said NO pictures but the OWNER of the relationship said otherwise.

Lizzy

425,217 次观看 • 2 年前

This is so good. “Take courage.” Take courage. Now, that seems like kind of a weak response, doesn’t it? Maybe some kind of a pep talk. You probably have had people tell you in the midst of your worst fears, and anxieties, and disappointments, and distress, and trouble – and somebody says, “Take courage.” And sometimes you want to whack them, as if they don’t even understand the depth of your problem with such a superficial answer. What do you mean? It’s a lot more complicated than that. Buck up, buddy, you know? That’s not going to work. And there’s a reason that’s not going to work when you say it: because you have absolutely no power over the circumstances, right? It’s a nice gesture. Cheer up. But you have no power over the circumstances. But there is one who does. When Jesus says, “Take courage,” that’s a different issue. There’s quite a remarkable use of the word here. It’s one word. “Take courage,” or cheer up, is one word: tharseite. One word in the Greek. It’s a verb form, and it’s in the imperative. It’s a command. Okay? Listen to this. Every time that word is used, and it’s used many times in the gospels and the New Testament – every time that word is used in the New Testament, it is in the imperative. It is a command. Cheer up. Take courage. Now, listen to this. Every time it is used in the New Testament, it is spoken by Jesus. No one else ever says that in the New Testament. That is a whole different issue. If the Lord Jesus, who is in control of absolutely everything, says, “Cheer up,” that’s different. That’s completely different. This is not just a well-intentioned pep talk. On the other hand, this is an absolutely divine promise. The disciples are distressed, to put it mildly. They’re afflicted. They’re pressured. They don’t know how they’re going to survive without Christ. He’s all they’ve known for three years. And our Lord says to them: “Cheer up. I’m going to tell you three things that should bring you joy. One, you are loved by God. Two, you are in God’s everlasting care. Three, God has a promise for your future.” You have love you have faith, and you have hope. You are loved by God. You believe in God. You hope in God. That’s all you need – to be loved by God, to be entrusted into God’s eternal care, and to have Him promise you a glorious future is all you need. — John MacArthur

This is so good. “Take courage.” Take courage. Now, that seems like kind of a weak response, doesn’t it? Maybe some kind of a pep talk. You probably have had people tell you in the midst of your worst fears, and anxieties, and disappointments, and distress, and trouble – and somebody says, “Take courage.” And sometimes you want to whack them, as if they don’t even understand the depth of your problem with such a superficial answer. What do you mean? It’s a lot more complicated than that. Buck up, buddy, you know? That’s not going to work. And there’s a reason that’s not going to work when you say it: because you have absolutely no power over the circumstances, right? It’s a nice gesture. Cheer up. But you have no power over the circumstances. But there is one who does. When Jesus says, “Take courage,” that’s a different issue. There’s quite a remarkable use of the word here. It’s one word. “Take courage,” or cheer up, is one word: tharseite. One word in the Greek. It’s a verb form, and it’s in the imperative. It’s a command. Okay? Listen to this. Every time that word is used, and it’s used many times in the gospels and the New Testament – every time that word is used in the New Testament, it is in the imperative. It is a command. Cheer up. Take courage. Now, listen to this. Every time it is used in the New Testament, it is spoken by Jesus. No one else ever says that in the New Testament. That is a whole different issue. If the Lord Jesus, who is in control of absolutely everything, says, “Cheer up,” that’s different. That’s completely different. This is not just a well-intentioned pep talk. On the other hand, this is an absolutely divine promise. The disciples are distressed, to put it mildly. They’re afflicted. They’re pressured. They don’t know how they’re going to survive without Christ. He’s all they’ve known for three years. And our Lord says to them: “Cheer up. I’m going to tell you three things that should bring you joy. One, you are loved by God. Two, you are in God’s everlasting care. Three, God has a promise for your future.” You have love you have faith, and you have hope. You are loved by God. You believe in God. You hope in God. That’s all you need – to be loved by God, to be entrusted into God’s eternal care, and to have Him promise you a glorious future is all you need. — John MacArthur

Terri Green

10,413 次观看 • 1 年前

PabloReports: Why do you think no one is showing up to Trump’s party on the National Mall? Magaziner: I don’t know. Because it’s not good? This is just a real missed opportunity. Instead, because Trump is who he is and only cares about himself and wants to be constantly feeding his own ego, he put together this shitty event that no one is at. You see the clips on Fox about how great it is, and behind them it’s like an empty field.

PabloReports: Why do you think no one is showing up to Trump’s party on the National Mall? Magaziner: I don’t know. Because it’s not good? This is just a real missed opportunity. Instead, because Trump is who he is and only cares about himself and wants to be constantly feeding his own ego, he put together this shitty event that no one is at. You see the clips on Fox about how great it is, and behind them it’s like an empty field.

Acyn

84,193 次观看 • 27 天前

Tyson plant just shut down. And no — this isn’t about “efficiency.” This is the playbook. Close regional plants. Create an artificial bottleneck. Crash cattle prices for ranchers. Raise beef prices for families. Same movie. Different town. Four corporations control ~85% of U.S. beef processing. That’s not capitalism — that’s a chokehold. When one company can flip a switch and wreck rural America while charging you more at the store, that’s not business. That’s a national security issue. This is exactly why we’re building the American Rancher Alliance. Transparent. Regional. American-owned beef — without the middlemen. Mess with the bull. You get the horns. 🦬🇺🇸 👉 Grocers, ranchers, restaurants:

Tyson plant just shut down. And no — this isn’t about “efficiency.” This is the playbook. Close regional plants. Create an artificial bottleneck. Crash cattle prices for ranchers. Raise beef prices for families. Same movie. Different town. Four corporations control ~85% of U.S. beef processing. That’s not capitalism — that’s a chokehold. When one company can flip a switch and wreck rural America while charging you more at the store, that’s not business. That’s a national security issue. This is exactly why we’re building the American Rancher Alliance. Transparent. Regional. American-owned beef — without the middlemen. Mess with the bull. You get the horns. 🦬🇺🇸 👉 Grocers, ranchers, restaurants:

American Rancher Alliance/Hufeisen Ranch

280,193 次观看 • 6 个月前

The biggest issue in the Black community isn’t racism. It’s not even fatherlessness. It’s decision-making. No one forced you to pull the trigger. No one made you blow your paycheck on consumption rather than investment. No one forced you to spend your time watching entertainment rather than using that same time to learn a new skill. We need to talk about this more than we do. Accountability. Personal Responsibility.

The biggest issue in the Black community isn’t racism. It’s not even fatherlessness. It’s decision-making. No one forced you to pull the trigger. No one made you blow your paycheck on consumption rather than investment. No one forced you to spend your time watching entertainment rather than using that same time to learn a new skill. We need to talk about this more than we do. Accountability. Personal Responsibility.

Jeffery Mead

58,568 次观看 • 1 年前

Ben Horowitz explains the two things every successful technology startup must do 1. Build a product that improves how some large group of people does something by 10x. “You have to build a transformational product. There is no way to build a great new company without a great product… If you look at the great technology companies, the thing that distinguishes them is the ability to keep coming up with a better way of doing things.” 2. Taking the market. “You can come up with the best product, but if you don’t [take the market], you really don’t have a company. Most technology businesses are network effects businesses. You have to win… If you’re an engineer, what business skills do you need to build a technology company? They’re all around the skills that you need to win the market. How do you out-market, out-sell, and beat the competition?… Do you build a good enough company that you go win?” Video Source: UC Berkeley

Ben Horowitz explains the two things every successful technology startup must do 1. Build a product that improves how some large group of people does something by 10x. “You have to build a transformational product. There is no way to build a great new company without a great product… If you look at the great technology companies, the thing that distinguishes them is the ability to keep coming up with a better way of doing things.” 2. Taking the market. “You can come up with the best product, but if you don’t [take the market], you really don’t have a company. Most technology businesses are network effects businesses. You have to win… If you’re an engineer, what business skills do you need to build a technology company? They’re all around the skills that you need to win the market. How do you out-market, out-sell, and beat the competition?… Do you build a good enough company that you go win?” Video Source: UC Berkeley

Startup Archive

77,268 次观看 • 1 年前

no one talks enough about how skilled and synchronized you have to be as a group to perform this song LIVE while hitting those notes every few seconds, all while keeping the energy and facial expressions up that you don’t need camera work to make the performance fun to watch 😭

no one talks enough about how skilled and synchronized you have to be as a group to perform this song LIVE while hitting those notes every few seconds, all while keeping the energy and facial expressions up that you don’t need camera work to make the performance fun to watch 😭

ria ˙𐃷˙ will see ahof

13,822 次观看 • 4 个月前

Ben Horowitz on the two things every successful technology startup must do 1. Build a product that improves how some large group of people does something by 10x. “You have to build a transformational product. There is no way to build a great new company without a great product… If you look at the great technology companies, the thing that distinguishes them is the ability to keep coming up with a better way of doing things.” 2. Taking the market. “You can come up with the best product, but if you don’t [take the market], you really don’t have a company. Most technology businesses are network effects businesses. You have to win… If you’re an engineer, what business skills do you need to build a technology company? They’re all around the skills that you need to win the market. How do you out-market, out-sell, and beat the competition?… Do you build a good enough company that you go win?” Video source: UC Berkeley (2009)

Ben Horowitz on the two things every successful technology startup must do 1. Build a product that improves how some large group of people does something by 10x. “You have to build a transformational product. There is no way to build a great new company without a great product… If you look at the great technology companies, the thing that distinguishes them is the ability to keep coming up with a better way of doing things.” 2. Taking the market. “You can come up with the best product, but if you don’t [take the market], you really don’t have a company. Most technology businesses are network effects businesses. You have to win… If you’re an engineer, what business skills do you need to build a technology company? They’re all around the skills that you need to win the market. How do you out-market, out-sell, and beat the competition?… Do you build a good enough company that you go win?” Video source: UC Berkeley (2009)

Startup Archive

36,753 次观看 • 4 个月前

Peter Thiel on why the name of your startup is predictive of success or failure “This is a slight aesthetic thing that I believe in very strongly: the names of companies are often very predictive of future failure or success.” PayPal and Napster are the first example Thiel gives: “PayPal was a very friendly name — it was the friend that helps you pay. Napster was a bad name — you nap some music, you nap a kid. That sounds like a bad thing to be doing, and it’s no wonder the government then comes in and shuts the company down within a few years.” “You want to be very careful of how you name companies,” Thiel warns founders. In the context of the sharing economy, he likes Airbnb more than Uber: “Airbnb sounds very innocent like this virtual bread and breakfast — this very light, non-threatening sort of company. Uber sounds like a bad name from Germany sometime in the 1930s. What are you exactly above? Maybe the law? This is probably something that, again from a regulatory perspective, I think Airbnb is a vastly better name than Uber.” And on the social networking side, Thiel likes Facebook more than MySpace: “You can say that all these social networks involve both reading and writing… Over time, reading dominates writing. Facebook was about learning about people around you — about their real identities at Harvard. MySpace started among wannabe actors in Los Angeles, and it was about them coming up with fictional narratives around themselves and a lot of other people in LA who are generally like that. And because reading dominates writing, Facebook would ultimately dominate MySpace. There’s a certain version where the whole arc of the company and the whole product arc was implicit in the names.” Video source: Mercatus Center (2015)

Peter Thiel on why the name of your startup is predictive of success or failure “This is a slight aesthetic thing that I believe in very strongly: the names of companies are often very predictive of future failure or success.” PayPal and Napster are the first example Thiel gives: “PayPal was a very friendly name — it was the friend that helps you pay. Napster was a bad name — you nap some music, you nap a kid. That sounds like a bad thing to be doing, and it’s no wonder the government then comes in and shuts the company down within a few years.” “You want to be very careful of how you name companies,” Thiel warns founders. In the context of the sharing economy, he likes Airbnb more than Uber: “Airbnb sounds very innocent like this virtual bread and breakfast — this very light, non-threatening sort of company. Uber sounds like a bad name from Germany sometime in the 1930s. What are you exactly above? Maybe the law? This is probably something that, again from a regulatory perspective, I think Airbnb is a vastly better name than Uber.” And on the social networking side, Thiel likes Facebook more than MySpace: “You can say that all these social networks involve both reading and writing… Over time, reading dominates writing. Facebook was about learning about people around you — about their real identities at Harvard. MySpace started among wannabe actors in Los Angeles, and it was about them coming up with fictional narratives around themselves and a lot of other people in LA who are generally like that. And because reading dominates writing, Facebook would ultimately dominate MySpace. There’s a certain version where the whole arc of the company and the whole product arc was implicit in the names.” Video source: Mercatus Center (2015)

Startup Archive

257,941 次观看 • 8 个月前