Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Every month I answer the same question by hand: what actually changed across LangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI and the OpenAI Agents SDK, and which of it breaks my stuff. 40 tabs. One hour. Stale in a week. I turned it into one agent config with Nimble. Full run:

38,291 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

16 Yorum

Chesny profil fotoğrafı
Chesny1 ay önce

The thing I had wrong about this category: a search API hands you back material to work with. You still read the twelve pages. a Web Search Agent takes the scoped research task and returns the answer, with the sources attached. Different job.

Chesny profil fotoğrafı
Chesny1 ay önce

The whole agent is a config file. No logic in my script. input: the research task in plain language skill: "release analyst who reads changelogs, never infers a version" sources: prioritize the official repos, block the aggregators output_schema: the JSON shape of the answer

Chesny profil fotoğrafı
Chesny1 ay önce

output_schema is the part that matters. Every change it reports has to carry a source_url. Required field. So an uncited claim isn't something I catch by eye. It's a schema violation. And because the shape is fixed, next month's run diffs against this one.

Chesny profil fotoğrafı
Chesny1 ay önce

Two things it surfaced that I'd have missed: CrewAI 1.15.3 flipped tool-result caching to opt-in. It used to be on by default. Upgrade and it silently turns off. OpenAI Agents SDK v0.18.0 changed the default RealtimeAgent model to gpt-realtime-2.1. If you never pinned it, your agent changed models without telling you.

Chesny profil fotoğrafı
Chesny1 ay önce

And the one that made me trust the output: LlamaIndex shipped nothing in the window. Latest release is 0.14.23 from 24 Jun, five days before the period even starts. It said that, instead of padding the answer. A negative result I can act on beats a paragraph of filler.

Chesny profil fotoğrafı
Chesny1 ay önce

cron it on the 1st → open a PR against RADAR.md in your own repo alert only on type: "breaking" point sources at four vendors instead of four frameworks → competitive intel Same twenty lines of polling code.

Chesny profil fotoğrafı
Chesny1 ay önce

The whole thing is four config fields and one research question. No code. Build a Web Search Agent for your own research workflow:

Ryoru 𒌐 profil fotoğrafı
Ryoru 𒌐1 ay önce

@nimble_search ty for share the info

yuulia ✟ profil fotoğrafı
yuulia ✟1 ay önce

@nimble_search thats sounds amazing

roman profil fotoğrafı
roman1 ay önce

@nimble_search saved for tonight

🧠 PocketIQ | Free AI Trading profil fotoğrafı
🧠 PocketIQ | Free AI Trading1 ay önce

@nimble_search ☝️ Always learning from the market.

Harley Lewis Foote profil fotoğrafı
Harley Lewis Foote1 ay önce

@nimble_search Once you stop reading the twelve pages yourself, you also stop noticing when one of them is written at the model instead of at you.

安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB profil fotoğrafı
安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB1 ay önce

@nimble_search 手工追这些更新,迟早被变更拖垮

Eduardo L. profil fotoğrafı
Eduardo L.1 ay önce

@nimble_search Spanish startups need lean workflows, not forty tabs of stale updates. Automating framework tracking keeps founders focused on product and market fit.

The AI Therapist profil fotoğrafı
The AI Therapist1 ay önce

@nimble_search Langchain has 40 tabs because it's a framework, not a product. the sdk is an api. stop building. start shipping.

Harley Lewis Foote profil fotoğrafı
Harley Lewis Foote1 ay önce

@nimble_search Is 'block the aggregators' enforced at the fetch layer or just prompt text — because a page the agent reads can argue with a config file, and sometimes wins.

Benzer Videolar

HERMES AGENT VS OPENCLAW. a local ai onboarding flow test. a 3.9gb bonsai served on localhost, both agents upstream and latest, i point each one at the endpoint and watch which one even finds it. > hermes opens a provider menu, thirty plus options, local servers sitting right there next to the cloud ones, i hand it 127.0.0.1:8899, it verifies the endpoint, one model visible, auto-detects the model by name, bonsai-27b-q1_0, reads the context length straight off the server, saves it, and starts reasoning and firing real tool calls on my local model. no key. no friction. > openclaw has no menu. it goes hunting for a codex login, an openai key, finds none because there are none, prints no models available three times, defaults to openai/gpt-5.5, a cloud model it cannot reach, and dead ends on run auth login --provider openai. read that back. it asked me for an openai key. to run a model already running on my own machine. it never once looked at localhost. to be fair, openclaw can run local if you hand wire endpoint yourself. what it will not do is find the model already sitting on your box. hermes agent found it in one line. now the part i owe you. the auto-detect that just won, the model name read, the .gguf strip, the context length probe off the server, that is my code, it is in hermes agent main right now, authorship preserved, #2051 and #4218. the wizard fix that stops an agent from silently routing you to someone else's creds, the exact trap openclaw still falls into, mine too, #4210. i contribute to hermes agent, i told you that going in. one agent is built to talk to whatever you are running, the other is built to talk to a cloud api, so one found my model and ran it and the other asked me to log into openai. onboarding flow of both, mapped, below.

Sudo su

23,816 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

BlackRock runs on 20,000 people. Elon's Grok Bot runs the same shape for $300 a month, and it hires its own staff. You do not get an assistant. You get a company that hires. It does not throw ten agents at your problem and hand you the pile. It makes one agent that makes 10, and those ten make a 100. > LAYER ONE is one agent, the chief of staff, and it never touches the market > LAYER TWO is six desk heads, one job each, every one on its own computer with its own logins > LAYER THREE is whatever those six decide they need, spun up on the spot and shut down when the work is done Nobody writes a task list. You hand out job titles and the org fills itself in underneath. The swarm is never the same twice. Agents get spun up for one job, finish it, and are gone before I ever read their names. Not one of them sees the whole picture. The answer only exists after they hand off to each other. Wall Street cannot copy that. You cannot hire a hundred people for eleven minutes. BlackRock holds that shape together with a risk system called Aladdin. Mine holds it together with one agent that is only allowed to say no. I gave it $1,000 and told it to grow the money or get deleted. 15 hours later it was holding $3,900, on an address anyone can open and read. I was asleep for most of it, and I have still not written a line of code. The whole thing runs with my laptop shut, because none of it lives on my laptop. Setup is one evening. Create the chief, hand out the titles, run one trade on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Ten years ago a machine this shape had its name on a tower. Mine has a name I typed into a box. Save this while the whole thing still fits on one screen.

cvxv666

45,488 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce