Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

#Factcheck There are commercially operating small modular reactors chris bowen. They rely on proven and trusted technology from larger reactors which have provided clean, reliable power for decades. ✍️Sign our petition:

93,431 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Will Shackel
Will Shackel2 лет назад

Politicians in general shouldn't be trusted to lead this nuclear debate. Experts like Jasmin have the knowledge and importantly the nuclear experience that we need to lean on. In addition to this omission from Chris Bowen today, Dutton also falsely claimed in his post that the "top 20 economies in the world" are moving "towards adopting the latest nuclear power technologies" when Germany has just abandoned their capacity and Italy don't have any either.

Фото профиля Alan Baxter ♛
Alan Baxter ♛2 лет назад

@Bowenchris I think politicians should have a "three strikes and you are out" rule. If Dutton lies two more times in this parliament, he should be banned from ever sitting as a member again and docked his superannuation.

Фото профиля Ash Leahy
Ash Leahy2 лет назад

@logyAussie @Bowenchris Where?

Фото профиля John G #IStandWithLaura #InLauraWeTrust
John G #IStandWithLaura #InLauraWeTrust2 лет назад

@Bowenchris There is no commercially operating SMR in any western country. Only in Russia and China and no one knows the extent of their build cost or operating cost. The only one being built in the West, in the US was shut down because of cost overruns. Next BS support point please Will?

Фото профиля BLUESKY IS BETTER
BLUESKY IS BETTER2 лет назад

@Bowenchris “Industry experts say SMRs are not commercially available, that nuclear energy is more expensive than alternatives and in a best-case scenario could not play a role in Australia for more than a decade, and probably not before 2040.” Some proof of your claim will help Will.

Фото профиля lisajane
lisajane2 лет назад

@Bowenchris It’s not completed in China. So it’s not a functioning SMR yet. Hasn’t this been under construction since 2010 and still not operational? It won’t be operational till 2026.

Фото профиля ello ello
ello ello2 лет назад

@Bowenchris Stop lying Will

Фото профиля Tony Smith
Tony Smith2 лет назад

@Bowenchris As simon hac says. The key words are commercially available SMR's which won't be developed for years, maybe decades. But we can install GWs of renewables and storage tomorrow that are commercially available and viable. We are on the clock here. This is a global heating emergency

Фото профиля Billzilla - Fuck Trump and Musk
Billzilla - Fuck Trump and Musk2 лет назад

@Bowenchris Nope, and I encourage everyone else to not sign it either. I am a fan of nuclear power (thorium molten-salt) but there is no need for it here as we have the perfect country for renewable power. And nuclear power is the most expensive form of power generation anyway.

Фото профиля soils1111. soils1111.bsky.social
soils1111. soils1111.bsky.social2 лет назад

@Bowenchris There is nothing stopping ANYONE doing business case to prove your point. If it stacks up the law can be changed,but no one other than you& the LNP think it's at all practical. And where is the photo of a modular unit operating now. Not an AI generated impression, a real one

Похожие видео