Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

For over a century, we believed evolution was just natural selection and mutation. We were wrong. The third, hidden pillar of evolution is cooperation. We tested whether SOTA language models possess this trait or if they default to greed. Introducing Commons Keeper v1.0 🧵

Abhishek Anand

6,547 subscribers

14,471 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

How is this possible? The answer is simple. The most important discoveries were and are still hidden from us. Imagine at what stage of evolution we could be if we applied all knowledge, not only those that are "allowed".

How is this possible? The answer is simple. The most important discoveries were and are still hidden from us. Imagine at what stage of evolution we could be if we applied all knowledge, not only those that are "allowed".

DeepWebSlinger

19,095 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Most people were taught Darwin’s theory of evolution explains how all life came to be. What if that’s not the full story? Stephen C. Meyer says growing evidence is challenging that idea, and many scientists are now calling for a new theory of evolution. “There’s a huge difference between the idea that natural selection is a real process… and the claim that it has unlimited creative power.” “Many leading evolutionary biologists today are now calling for a new theory of evolution.” “They recognize that the mutation natural selection mechanism has limited creative power.” “It does a nice job of explaining small-scale variation and adaptation.” “But it doesn’t do a good job of explaining… major new body plans or new forms.” Stephen C. Meyer

Most people were taught Darwin’s theory of evolution explains how all life came to be. What if that’s not the full story? Stephen C. Meyer says growing evidence is challenging that idea, and many scientists are now calling for a new theory of evolution. “There’s a huge difference between the idea that natural selection is a real process… and the claim that it has unlimited creative power.” “Many leading evolutionary biologists today are now calling for a new theory of evolution.” “They recognize that the mutation natural selection mechanism has limited creative power.” “It does a nice job of explaining small-scale variation and adaptation.” “But it doesn’t do a good job of explaining… major new body plans or new forms.” Stephen C. Meyer

Jan Jekielek

77,522 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Excited to release PostTrainBench v1.0! This benchmark evaluates the ability of frontier AI agents to post-train language models in a simplified setting. We believe this is a first step toward tracking progress in recursive self-improvement 🧵:

Excited to release PostTrainBench v1.0! This benchmark evaluates the ability of frontier AI agents to post-train language models in a simplified setting. We believe this is a first step toward tracking progress in recursive self-improvement 🧵:

Karina

194,834 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Introducing Modality Forcing, a recipe for post-training T2I models for SOTA RGB-Depth generation! Text-to-image (T2I) models learn rich representations of the spatial world. How do we build on this prior for high-quality depth generation? 🧵 [1/6]

Introducing Modality Forcing, a recipe for post-training T2I models for SOTA RGB-Depth generation! Text-to-image (T2I) models learn rich representations of the spatial world. How do we build on this prior for high-quality depth generation? 🧵 [1/6]

Bardienus Duisterhof

65,326 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

When we were kids, we believed monsters could be our friends, we believed we could ride on the back of a whale, we believed that if we just closed our eyes, anything could come true. As we grew up, those wild and wandering thoughtsbecame harder and harder to say out loud. But the truth is, they never really went away. They were just waiting for a way out. Now, let them run free. Ride your imagination, happy creating. For everyone who still has a little child living in their heart.

When we were kids, we believed monsters could be our friends, we believed we could ride on the back of a whale, we believed that if we just closed our eyes, anything could come true. As we grew up, those wild and wandering thoughtsbecame harder and harder to say out loud. But the truth is, they never really went away. They were just waiting for a way out. Now, let them run free. Ride your imagination, happy creating. For everyone who still has a little child living in their heart.

HappyHorse

2,169,096 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Introducing our CEO Xana, but AI version. As we journey towards the evolution of #XANA 2.0, We plan to broadcast important updates daily to everyone around the world. What people truly seek is a place where they truly belong – and that's exactly what we provide. $XETA

Introducing our CEO Xana, but AI version. As we journey towards the evolution of #XANA 2.0, We plan to broadcast important updates daily to everyone around the world. What people truly seek is a place where they truly belong – and that's exactly what we provide. $XETA

XANA

20,511 просмотров • 2 лет назад

👤: Did the chicken come first or the egg? Gunwook's answer: Egg Reason: He argued that we need to think about how the chicken even became a chicken and how it came to lay eggs. Chickens of today are from years of evolution and natural selection. (1/2)

👤: Did the chicken come first or the egg? Gunwook's answer: Egg Reason: He argued that we need to think about how the chicken even became a chicken and how it came to lay eggs. Chickens of today are from years of evolution and natural selection. (1/2)

Mono⁰-¹🌸🪻

146,127 просмотров • 1 год назад

New #ACL2025NLP Paper! 🎉 Curious what AI thinks about YOU? We interact with AI every day, offering all kinds of feedback, both implicit ✏️ and explicit 👍. What if we used this feedback to personalize your AI assistant to you? Introducing SynthesizeMe! An approach for creating natural language personal user models from your interactions. 🧵

New #ACL2025NLP Paper! 🎉 Curious what AI thinks about YOU? We interact with AI every day, offering all kinds of feedback, both implicit ✏️ and explicit 👍. What if we used this feedback to personalize your AI assistant to you? Introducing SynthesizeMe! An approach for creating natural language personal user models from your interactions. 🧵

Michael Ryan

47,080 просмотров • 1 год назад

Remember when $40,000 per year was enough to live on? 🔊 ... 🤨 I keep hearing this over and over again from Gen Z "we did every we were told, we went to college, we got the degree, it's not our fault, the previous generation did this to us ..." What do you think? Is Gen Z innocent and just got a bad deal at the wrong time? or are some of them also responsible for their situation because they made lousy choices on what they studied and they overspent for those degrees?

Remember when $40,000 per year was enough to live on? 🔊 ... 🤨 I keep hearing this over and over again from Gen Z "we did every we were told, we went to college, we got the degree, it's not our fault, the previous generation did this to us ..." What do you think? Is Gen Z innocent and just got a bad deal at the wrong time? or are some of them also responsible for their situation because they made lousy choices on what they studied and they overspent for those degrees?

Wall Street Mav

5,958,110 просмотров • 2 лет назад

THIS IS TECHNOLOGY....⚡️🏰🏯 WHO were the BUILDERS of our past? HOW were they able to build such colossal and TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED structures?...now DEFUNCT, repurposed, the BELLS removed, the ORGANS now silent...MUCH of this magnificent ARCHICTECTURE all but destroyed forever. WHO taught them how to harness the NATURAL ENERGY from the ionosphere? Were the builders a PEOPLE unlike us...or did WE alao once possess such knowledge and capabilities? A thought...when this realm was created is it POSSIBLE that EVERYTHING we needed was also created for us?

THIS IS TECHNOLOGY....⚡️🏰🏯 WHO were the BUILDERS of our past? HOW were they able to build such colossal and TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED structures?...now DEFUNCT, repurposed, the BELLS removed, the ORGANS now silent...MUCH of this magnificent ARCHICTECTURE all but destroyed forever. WHO taught them how to harness the NATURAL ENERGY from the ionosphere? Were the builders a PEOPLE unlike us...or did WE alao once possess such knowledge and capabilities? A thought...when this realm was created is it POSSIBLE that EVERYTHING we needed was also created for us?

WhatdoIknow

52,341 просмотров • 2 лет назад

John Fetterman Is a Great Example of the Type of Politician we need more of. I'm not talking about his politics. I understand that we all have opinions on various issues and vote for those who we feel will implement the best policies. But... I'm sick and tired of politicians who refuse to show any weakness, as if they are some sort of perfect robot. The willingness to admit you aren't perfect, face your demons and come out stronger because of it, is a trait we need more of from our role models. We don't need narcissists as role models or leading our nation. Whether it's blaming everyone but yourself for the mistakes you make, or refusing to correct a statement and admit that you were wrong, the mentality that one is perfect is not something that I think should appeal to any voter. Thank you John Fetterman for speaking truth and not being afraid to show a weakness. Admitting Weakness makes one stronger.

John Fetterman Is a Great Example of the Type of Politician we need more of. I'm not talking about his politics. I understand that we all have opinions on various issues and vote for those who we feel will implement the best policies. But... I'm sick and tired of politicians who refuse to show any weakness, as if they are some sort of perfect robot. The willingness to admit you aren't perfect, face your demons and come out stronger because of it, is a trait we need more of from our role models. We don't need narcissists as role models or leading our nation. Whether it's blaming everyone but yourself for the mistakes you make, or refusing to correct a statement and admit that you were wrong, the mentality that one is perfect is not something that I think should appeal to any voter. Thank you John Fetterman for speaking truth and not being afraid to show a weakness. Admitting Weakness makes one stronger.

Brian Krassenstein

1,681,384 просмотров • 2 лет назад

"The way we see the results of the weekend, we should get inside the pitch with a different excitement... and Old Trafford was THERE, saying: 'We are all here to give a big step up.' "And I felt that we were not ready... This five weeks, everyone is praising our evolution. We are not even near the moment we're supposed to be in this club." Ruben Amorim on who takes responsibility for #MUFC's defeat to Everton.

"The way we see the results of the weekend, we should get inside the pitch with a different excitement... and Old Trafford was THERE, saying: 'We are all here to give a big step up.' "And I felt that we were not ready... This five weeks, everyone is praising our evolution. We are not even near the moment we're supposed to be in this club." Ruben Amorim on who takes responsibility for #MUFC's defeat to Everton.

Stretford Paddock

118,702 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

With evolution in our hands – what will we create? At the Nobel Prize banquet, chemistry laureate Frances Arnold speaks about creating and using molecules for the common good: "With evolution in our hands, with the ability to set genetic diversity and tailor the forces of selection, we can now explore paths that nature has left unexplored. We can also explore paths that nature will never explore. We can select life and their chemistries to our benefit, to create new sources of energy, to fix the carbon in our atmosphere, to cure disease, to make us younger, more beautiful. Or we can make new weapons of terror or state control. Which shall it be?" She was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2018 for the directed evolution of enzymes, together with George Smith and Gregory Winter. Learn more about her:

With evolution in our hands – what will we create? At the Nobel Prize banquet, chemistry laureate Frances Arnold speaks about creating and using molecules for the common good: "With evolution in our hands, with the ability to set genetic diversity and tailor the forces of selection, we can now explore paths that nature has left unexplored. We can also explore paths that nature will never explore. We can select life and their chemistries to our benefit, to create new sources of energy, to fix the carbon in our atmosphere, to cure disease, to make us younger, more beautiful. Or we can make new weapons of terror or state control. Which shall it be?" She was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2018 for the directed evolution of enzymes, together with George Smith and Gregory Winter. Learn more about her:

The Nobel Prize

21,192 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

The theory of evolution is bullshit. Period. Can’t find one evolutionist who can explain why apes still exist. What, are all the other apes absolutely retarded? They just can’t figure this evolution thing out? These are the same people who will point towards snakes having legs at one point as proof of evolution - except there isn’t a single snake running around the planet with feet. My point? They contradict themselves. If all snakes have evolved to a point where they no longer have feet, THEN WHY HAVEN’T ALL APES EVOLVED INTO HUMAN BEINGS. Simple: Because we didn’t evolve from apes. Evolution theory also does nothing to explain RH- blood, of which 15% of the planet possesses. That means that roughly 1.2 BILLION people possess blood that is in no way genetically tied to a monkey or an ape. But evolution, right? 🤣

The theory of evolution is bullshit. Period. Can’t find one evolutionist who can explain why apes still exist. What, are all the other apes absolutely retarded? They just can’t figure this evolution thing out? These are the same people who will point towards snakes having legs at one point as proof of evolution - except there isn’t a single snake running around the planet with feet. My point? They contradict themselves. If all snakes have evolved to a point where they no longer have feet, THEN WHY HAVEN’T ALL APES EVOLVED INTO HUMAN BEINGS. Simple: Because we didn’t evolve from apes. Evolution theory also does nothing to explain RH- blood, of which 15% of the planet possesses. That means that roughly 1.2 BILLION people possess blood that is in no way genetically tied to a monkey or an ape. But evolution, right? 🤣

Paul Fleuret

254,980 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

“If we can afford not to have a wealth tax, not to equalise capital gains, or draw on the excess profits of corporate greed; then we can afford PIP for a disabled person.” Labour MP Rachael Maskell gave a passionate and emotive speech at the welfare bill debate in commons this afternoon. Watch the clip 🎬

“If we can afford not to have a wealth tax, not to equalise capital gains, or draw on the excess profits of corporate greed; then we can afford PIP for a disabled person.” Labour MP Rachael Maskell gave a passionate and emotive speech at the welfare bill debate in commons this afternoon. Watch the clip 🎬

Big Issue

38,963 просмотров • 1 год назад

If animals live longer, they can have more kids, and pass on more of their genes. So why hasn't evolution solved aging? Jacob Kimmel explained the three evolutionary reasons why we still grow old: (1) Longevity doesn't actually help that much. Most of our primate ancestors didn't die of natural causes: if you are probably going to be eaten by a tiger, a naturally long lifespan is pointless. (2) Some genes might benefit from aging! If an older animal dies, often the resources they would have consumed are instead consumed by younger kin, who are genetically similar to them but more likely to reproduce. (3) Even if the two other arguments are wrong and there's selection against aging, there might be even stronger selection on other traits. Evolution just might not prioritise longevity.

If animals live longer, they can have more kids, and pass on more of their genes. So why hasn't evolution solved aging? Jacob Kimmel explained the three evolutionary reasons why we still grow old: (1) Longevity doesn't actually help that much. Most of our primate ancestors didn't die of natural causes: if you are probably going to be eaten by a tiger, a naturally long lifespan is pointless. (2) Some genes might benefit from aging! If an older animal dies, often the resources they would have consumed are instead consumed by younger kin, who are genetically similar to them but more likely to reproduce. (3) Even if the two other arguments are wrong and there's selection against aging, there might be even stronger selection on other traits. Evolution just might not prioritise longevity.

Dwarkesh Patel

125,029 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Joy Reid: "MSNBC was not just a channel for a lot of people. It was a lifeline... People believed that every single person on MSNBC was their friend... We were the good liberal friend who they could talk with... We were like Sesame Street to people."

Joy Reid: "MSNBC was not just a channel for a lot of people. It was a lifeline... People believed that every single person on MSNBC was their friend... We were the good liberal friend who they could talk with... We were like Sesame Street to people."

Thomas Sowell Quotes

127,836 просмотров • 1 год назад