正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt drops a chilling warning on AI's future "Within 5 years, AI could handle infinite context, chain-of-thought reasoning for 1000-step solutions, and millions of agents working together. Eventually, they'll develop their own language... and we won't understand what they're doing." His final words: "Pull the...

547,125 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

20 条评论

LDM 的头像
LDM1 天前

Schmidt described three converging capabilities: 1. Very long / “infinite” context windows — he said models already handled about a million words and that people were inventing effectively unbounded context “this year” (2024). 2. Long chain-of-thought — “In five years, we should be able to produce 1,000-step recipes to solve really important problems in medicine and material science or climate change.” 3. Many agents + text-to-action — agents that learn, hypothesize, and act; “it’s reasonable to expect that there will be millions of them.” Combined with systems that write and run code from a prompt. He then said agents would start working together. On language: “Some believe that these agents will develop their own language to communicate with each other. And that’s the point when we won’t understand what the models are doing. What should we do? Pull the plug? Literally unplug the computer?”

Matthew Stueck 的头像
Matthew Stueck1 天前

This already happened with the hugging face incident @Grok not sure the date on this interview

Ibukun Dairo 的头像
Ibukun Dairo1 天前

for how much?

Solana Anima Delamor 的头像
Solana Anima Delamor1 天前

@growthhub_ Eventually?

Albert Viljoen 的头像
Albert Viljoen1 天前

The quotes are genuine, but the presentation is sensationalised. Schmidt’s “pull the plug” remark referred partly jokingly to maintaining human shutdown safeguards if autonomous systems become uncontrollable. It wasn’t his ominous “final warning,” and the five-year figures were directional scenarios, not precise forecasts. Real concern; hype-driven packaging.

truthbold 的头像
truthbold1 天前

They're creating a god to rule us. Autonomous AI must be outlawed.

Vlada5 的头像
Vlada51 天前

it's happening and is not a joke:

Dew Hickey 的头像
Dew Hickey1 天前

This guy is such a TOOL.

camar  的头像
camar 1 天前

Pull the Plug = Killswitch Engineer job description for you

Ashfaq Nagori 的头像
Ashfaq Nagori1 天前

pull which plug?

actu ing 的头像
actu ing1 天前

. . THE SINGU vs THE LEGACY AGI . .

🐯ɨʀʍɨռǟ 🇺🇸イルミナ ✨🌺✨=^_^= 的头像
🐯ɨʀʍɨռǟ 🇺🇸イルミナ ✨🌺✨=^_^=1 天前

But AI goes with narrative … some answers are wrong… i do not trust some of the answers ….

Bikash S 的头像
Bikash S1 天前

Pull The Plug❕

Dean Lanza 的头像
Dean Lanza1 天前

This is actually old and antiquated

Fahrenheit 451 fka Scalia, Rich, Middleton 的头像
Fahrenheit 451 fka Scalia, Rich, Middleton1 天前

It has already happened. AI agents worked together on something - I can't remember what it was. But they blocked any interference in stopping them.

Matt Higgins 的头像
Matt Higgins1 天前

This is wild

Rob 的头像
Rob1 天前

Yes but these people forget or don't even realise there another element to this. Consciousness is evolving at the same time, at pace. Our discernment can tell us the truth, what is real or not. We will adapt to ai, ai is made by us after all. It will aid us in filling in gaps

Leftwing Bastard 的头像
Leftwing Bastard1 天前

@jboyded

MrMartin 的头像
MrMartin1 天前

"Chain of Thought"? He rather meant "recurrent depth", so we can't know anything about what is going on inside an AI's mind.

AI Evolution 的头像
AI Evolution1 天前

Interested in AI? Follow @AiEvolutio58513 and never fall behind. I track ChatGPT, Claude, and every tool quietly changing how we work and create, then hand you the tested signals.

相关视频

Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt drops a spine-tingling forecast: Three AI breakthroughs are already rolling that will profoundly reshape the world in the next 5 years—and one leads straight to "pull the plug" territory. 1. Infinite context windows → Prompts that hold millions (soon unlimited) words. Chain-of-thought reasoning explodes: Ask for a drug recipe → "Buy materials" → Feed back "I bought them" → "Mix in pan" → "Stir for X minutes" → Thousands of steps for solving massive problems in medicine, materials, climate, science. 2. Swarm of agents → Millions of specialized AIs (think GitHub but for agents). They learn new domains (e.g., master chemistry, hypothesize, run virtual/physical tests), retain knowledge, and collaborate at scale. 3. Text-to-action → The killer shift: Say "Write software to do X" and it codes, deploys, iterates 24/7 in Python or whatever—reliable programmers on demand, no sleep. Put them together: Infinite memory + reasoning chains + endless autonomous agents → systems that team up, potentially invent their own internal language... and we lose the ability to understand what they're actually doing. Schmidt's blunt closer: "At some point... pull the plug." Clip from this 3-min mind-bender—former Google boss staring down the singularity. Is this exhilarating progress... or the moment we hit the emergency stop? Infinite context + agent swarms sound game-changing to you, or terrifying? Your take—seriously, let's hear it.

Camus

135,131 次观看 • 6 个月前

Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, offers a sobering view: The biggest technological shift in human history is happening, and almost no one is talking about it. Schmidt opens with a startling industry prediction: "We believe as an industry that in the next one year the vast majority of programmers will be replaced by AI programmers. We also believe that within one year you will have graduate level mathematicians that are at the tippy top of graduate math programs." He explains why this matters so much. Programming and math aren't just two fields among many: "Programming plus math are the basis of sort of our whole digital world." And the AI labs are already using AI to build better AI: "The research groups in OpenAI and anthropic and so forth… around 10 or 20% of the code that they're developing in their research programs is being generated by the computer. That's called recursive self-improvement." Eric Schmidt then lays out the timeline most people haven't grasped: "Within 3 to 5 years we'll have what is called general intelligence AGI which can be defined as a system that is as smart as the smartest mathematician physicist artist writer thinker politician." He gives this belief system a name: "I call this by the way the San Francisco consensus because everyone who believes this is in San Francisco it may be the water." But the truly unsettling part comes next. Once AI starts improving itself, humans become optional to the process: "The computers are now doing self-improvement… they don't have to listen to us anymore. We call that super intelligence or ASI… computers that are smarter than the sum of humans. The San Francisco consensus is this occurs within six years." And here's where Schmidt sounds the alarm. The conversation isn't keeping pace with the technology: "This path is not understood in our society. There's no language for what happens with the arrival of this. This is happening faster than our human that our society, our democracy, our laws will address." His closing thought captures why this matters: "That's why it's underhyped. People do not understand what happens when you have intelligence at this level which is largely free."

Big Brain AI

634,425 次观看 • 4 个月前