Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Francois Chollet + Sam Altman Fireside François Chollet and Sam Altman fireside during ARC-AGI-3 Launch Party moderated by Deedy They discuss: - Social contracts evolving - AGI views as a parent - When will labs score >85% on ARC-AGI-3?

arcprize's profile picture

ARC Prize

40,097 subscribers

33,454 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"I've updated my AGI timeline." One year later, Dwarkesh Patel and François Chollet meet on camera again. Both of them have shifted their AGI timelines. They dive into AGI macroeconomics, the singularity, and ARC-AGI-3 preview.
23:46

"I've updated my AGI timeline." One year later, Dwarkesh Patel and François Chollet meet on camera again. Both of them have shifted their AGI timelines. They dive into AGI macroeconomics, the singularity, and ARC-AGI-3 preview.

ARC Prize

47,622 views • 1 year ago

"We are trying to build a new branch of machine learning. An alternative to Deep Learning itself...building something that we call Symbolic Descent." François Chollet joins the Y Combinator Lightcone podcast to share about our research at Ndea and the launch of ARC-AGI-3.
2:02

"We are trying to build a new branch of machine learning. An alternative to Deep Learning itself...building something that we call Symbolic Descent." François Chollet joins the Y Combinator Lightcone podcast to share about our research at Ndea and the launch of ARC-AGI-3.

Ndea

65,046 views • 4 months ago

When will AGI happen? Sam Altman: We are in the middle of the process. It's not a single point, but a transition. "Our goal is an automated AI researcher by March 2028." It's about inching closer, surpassing humans on multiple axes.
2:14

When will AGI happen? Sam Altman: We are in the middle of the process. It's not a single point, but a transition. "Our goal is an automated AI researcher by March 2028." It's about inching closer, surpassing humans on multiple axes.

Chubby♨️

76,337 views • 9 months ago

Sam Altman says the leap from GPT-4 to GPT-5 will be as big as that of GPT-3 to 4 and the plan is to integrate the GPT and o series of models into one model that can do everything - that’s the AGI
0:55

Sam Altman says the leap from GPT-4 to GPT-5 will be as big as that of GPT-3 to 4 and the plan is to integrate the GPT and o series of models into one model that can do everything - that’s the AGI

Chubby♨️

231,782 views • 1 year ago

Sam Altman on GPT 6 • The GDPv eval will shift some of the way we do post training • overall we are keeping the same strategy going into GPT 6 Sam Altman on AGI: Sam Altman about AGI: "we are finally in the moment": "As the closer we get to it, the fuzzier the Agi concept becomes. But the one thing that I care the most about and, to my great surprise, we're finally in the moment; where it's starting to happen is, when it can do novel discovery, when It can expand the total human knowledge base.“ I have seen some examples from credible professors, that novel math problems have been solved. Such as GPT 5 Pro reportedly solving Yu Tsumura’s 554th problem, an IMO level group theory challenge that an August preprint said no LLM had solved, so the new claim is being actively contested. Sébastien Bubeck also said GPT 5 Pro produced a new proof that tightened a bound in smooth convex optimization.
1:25

Sam Altman on GPT 6 • The GDPv eval will shift some of the way we do post training • overall we are keeping the same strategy going into GPT 6 Sam Altman on AGI: Sam Altman about AGI: "we are finally in the moment": "As the closer we get to it, the fuzzier the Agi concept becomes. But the one thing that I care the most about and, to my great surprise, we're finally in the moment; where it's starting to happen is, when it can do novel discovery, when It can expand the total human knowledge base.“ I have seen some examples from credible professors, that novel math problems have been solved. Such as GPT 5 Pro reportedly solving Yu Tsumura’s 554th problem, an IMO level group theory challenge that an August preprint said no LLM had solved, so the new claim is being actively contested. Sébastien Bubeck also said GPT 5 Pro produced a new proof that tightened a bound in smooth convex optimization.

Chris

221,718 views • 10 months ago

Sam Altman says AGI has stopped being a useful definition. Instead watch two thresholds: > When more cognitive capacity exists in data centers than in human minds. He thinks this could happen by late 2028. > When CEOs, presidents, and Nobel Prize scientists can’t do their jobs without heavy reliance on AI.
1:44

Sam Altman says AGI has stopped being a useful definition. Instead watch two thresholds: > When more cognitive capacity exists in data centers than in human minds. He thinks this could happen by late 2028. > When CEOs, presidents, and Nobel Prize scientists can’t do their jobs without heavy reliance on AI.

vitrupo

101,899 views • 5 months ago

François Chollet (François Chollet) has spent years asking a different question than most of the AI world. Instead of scaling what already works, he’s trying to understand what intelligence actually is and how to build it from first principles. In this episode of the Lightcone Podcast, he traces that path from his early work on deep learning to the creation of the ARC Prize, and the launch of ARC V3, a new benchmark designed to measure something deeper than performance: the ability to learn, adapt, and reason efficiently in entirely new environments. He explains why today’s systems may be hitting limits, what recent breakthroughs really mean, and why reaching true general intelligence may require a fundamentally different approach. 00:00 - AGI by 2030? 00:31 - Introducing Ndea: A New Path Beyond Deep Learning 01:08 - A New ML Paradigm 01:30 - Replacing neural nets with compact symbolic programs 03:04 - Why Ndea Isn’t Competing With Coding Agents 05:20 - Why Everyone Might Be Wrong About Scaling LLMs 07:22 - Why Coding Agents Suddenly Work So Well 08:50 - The Limits of LLMs in Non-Verifiable Domains 10:48 - What AGI Actually Means (And Why Most Definitions Are Wrong) 13:30 - Why Deep Learning Hits a Wall 14:00 - ARC’s Origin Story 18:20 - ARC Benchmarks Explained: From V1 to V3 22:49 - The RL Loop Powering Coding Agents Today 27:03 - ARC-AGI V3: Measuring “Agentic Intelligence” 31:14 - Inside the ARC Game Studio 35:31 - Could AGI Fit in 10,000 Lines of Code? 44:01 - Building Ndea: From Idea to Compounding Research Stack 46:46 - The Future of ARC: Benchmarks That Evolve With AI 47:21 - Why There’s Still Huge Opportunity for New AI Paradigms 53:37 - How to Build a Breakout Open Source Project - Lessons From Keras 56:39 - Advice For How To Think About AI
57:23

François Chollet (François Chollet) has spent years asking a different question than most of the AI world. Instead of scaling what already works, he’s trying to understand what intelligence actually is and how to build it from first principles. In this episode of the Lightcone Podcast, he traces that path from his early work on deep learning to the creation of the ARC Prize, and the launch of ARC V3, a new benchmark designed to measure something deeper than performance: the ability to learn, adapt, and reason efficiently in entirely new environments. He explains why today’s systems may be hitting limits, what recent breakthroughs really mean, and why reaching true general intelligence may require a fundamentally different approach. 00:00 - AGI by 2030? 00:31 - Introducing Ndea: A New Path Beyond Deep Learning 01:08 - A New ML Paradigm 01:30 - Replacing neural nets with compact symbolic programs 03:04 - Why Ndea Isn’t Competing With Coding Agents 05:20 - Why Everyone Might Be Wrong About Scaling LLMs 07:22 - Why Coding Agents Suddenly Work So Well 08:50 - The Limits of LLMs in Non-Verifiable Domains 10:48 - What AGI Actually Means (And Why Most Definitions Are Wrong) 13:30 - Why Deep Learning Hits a Wall 14:00 - ARC’s Origin Story 18:20 - ARC Benchmarks Explained: From V1 to V3 22:49 - The RL Loop Powering Coding Agents Today 27:03 - ARC-AGI V3: Measuring “Agentic Intelligence” 31:14 - Inside the ARC Game Studio 35:31 - Could AGI Fit in 10,000 Lines of Code? 44:01 - Building Ndea: From Idea to Compounding Research Stack 46:46 - The Future of ARC: Benchmarks That Evolve With AI 47:21 - Why There’s Still Huge Opportunity for New AI Paradigms 53:37 - How to Build a Breakout Open Source Project - Lessons From Keras 56:39 - Advice For How To Think About AI

Y Combinator

151,649 views • 4 months ago

Tomorrow, Sam Altman and Greg Brockman will be on a podcast together for the first time ever. And they will give an exact date for the arrival of AGI. New models, the trial with Elon Musk, Anthropic beef, Sam personal drama, the future of compute buys, Kylie Robison and I do it all. Core Memory episode 67 hits on the Substack only. If you want the goods, it's time to sub up The Core Memory pod is on all major platforms and brought to you by Brex and @e1ventures because they have great taste.
0:31

Tomorrow, Sam Altman and Greg Brockman will be on a podcast together for the first time ever. And they will give an exact date for the arrival of AGI. New models, the trial with Elon Musk, Anthropic beef, Sam personal drama, the future of compute buys, Kylie Robison and I do it all. Core Memory episode 67 hits on the Substack only. If you want the goods, it's time to sub up The Core Memory pod is on all major platforms and brought to you by Brex and @e1ventures because they have great taste.

Ashlee Vance

254,041 views • 3 months ago

Zero-person billion dollar companies. Early AGI-like breakthroughs. Viral Sora deepfakes. Sam Altman broke it all down in our exclusive DevDay conversation. Highlights: 0:00 Intro 0:43 DevDay's biggest launches 2:13 Agent Builder vs GPT Builder 3:43 The no-code revolution for AI agents 5:20 Betting pool on zero-person companies 6:50 What would 20-year-old Sam build? 10:22 GPT-5 vs Claude on GDPval 11:30 When have we achieved AGI? 12:44 Scientific breakthroughs AI will solve 13:59 AI 'work slop' costs $186/employee 16:12 Sam's viral Sora memes 20:11 Revenue sharing for cameos 22:33 1B jobs are changing 24:35 What work looks like after AGI 25:44 Global AI safety framework 27:46 Most exciting agents to build
30:50

Zero-person billion dollar companies. Early AGI-like breakthroughs. Viral Sora deepfakes. Sam Altman broke it all down in our exclusive DevDay conversation. Highlights: 0:00 Intro 0:43 DevDay's biggest launches 2:13 Agent Builder vs GPT Builder 3:43 The no-code revolution for AI agents 5:20 Betting pool on zero-person companies 6:50 What would 20-year-old Sam build? 10:22 GPT-5 vs Claude on GDPval 11:30 When have we achieved AGI? 12:44 Scientific breakthroughs AI will solve 13:59 AI 'work slop' costs $186/employee 16:12 Sam's viral Sora memes 20:11 Revenue sharing for cameos 22:33 1B jobs are changing 24:35 What work looks like after AGI 25:44 Global AI safety framework 27:46 Most exciting agents to build

Rowan Cheung

325,305 views • 10 months ago

ARC-AGI-3 is built different, it has dumbfounded almost all regular attempts so far because it's so much harder than anything that came before. It has no rules, it's agentic and has no explicit goals, they need to be discovered. Tufalabs won the first milestone of ARC Prize > There is no language built into the benchmark, but these guys "put the language back in", because in their view - it's the best way to climb up the notional "abstraction mountain" and effectively use many of the abstractions which have evolved over millions of years of language evolution. > They built a novel harness "The Duck" around a 27B open weights model (Qwen 3.6) to solve extremely challenging and novel reasoning problems that require abstraction. > This is the launch video of their winning agentic harness, "The Duck". We have also released an exclusive interview with them on MLST, just dropped. > The million dollar question is: what will François Chollet think about how they've done it, and is this a step towards AGI?
33:13

ARC-AGI-3 is built different, it has dumbfounded almost all regular attempts so far because it's so much harder than anything that came before. It has no rules, it's agentic and has no explicit goals, they need to be discovered. Tufalabs won the first milestone of ARC Prize > There is no language built into the benchmark, but these guys "put the language back in", because in their view - it's the best way to climb up the notional "abstraction mountain" and effectively use many of the abstractions which have evolved over millions of years of language evolution. > They built a novel harness "The Duck" around a 27B open weights model (Qwen 3.6) to solve extremely challenging and novel reasoning problems that require abstraction. > This is the launch video of their winning agentic harness, "The Duck". We have also released an exclusive interview with them on MLST, just dropped. > The million dollar question is: what will François Chollet think about how they've done it, and is this a step towards AGI?

Machine Learning Street Talk

35,121 views • 1 month ago

Sam Altman about AGI: "we are finally in the moment": "As the closer we get to it, the fuzzier the [AGI] concept becomes. But the one thing that I care the most about and, to my great surprise, we're finally in the moment; where it's starting to happen is, when it can do novel discovery, when It can expand the total human knowledge base. (...) But you see all these examples now on Twitter where scientists in these different fields are saying it made a small discovery, or it came up with a novel approach, or it figured something out."
2:29

Sam Altman about AGI: "we are finally in the moment": "As the closer we get to it, the fuzzier the [AGI] concept becomes. But the one thing that I care the most about and, to my great surprise, we're finally in the moment; where it's starting to happen is, when it can do novel discovery, when It can expand the total human knowledge base. (...) But you see all these examples now on Twitter where scientists in these different fields are saying it made a small discovery, or it came up with a novel approach, or it figured something out."

Chubby♨️

137,476 views • 10 months ago

The Sam Altman Interview You know him as the CEO of OpenAI — but he's also an avid writer. We spoke not once but twice about how Sam captures ideas, clarifies his thinking, edits his writing, decides what to work on, and uses ChatGPT. Timestamps: 1:47 Will LLMs change how we write? 8:39 How does Sam use ChatGPT? 11:26 How Sam became less anxious 17:24 Sam once dreamed of being a novelist 18:37 Lessons from Peter Thiel 21:35 Lessons from Paul Graham 26:02 The book Sam Altman wants to write 28:37 Advice for startup founders 30:20 How Y Combinator shapes OpenAI 35:55 How Sam chose to work on AGI 37:35 Writing strategy memos at OpenAI 41:34 Why isn’t ChatGPT a better storyteller? 44:20 Sam's obsessive note-taking method 47:12 Will AI put writers out of work?
48:38

The Sam Altman Interview You know him as the CEO of OpenAI — but he's also an avid writer. We spoke not once but twice about how Sam captures ideas, clarifies his thinking, edits his writing, decides what to work on, and uses ChatGPT. Timestamps: 1:47 Will LLMs change how we write? 8:39 How does Sam use ChatGPT? 11:26 How Sam became less anxious 17:24 Sam once dreamed of being a novelist 18:37 Lessons from Peter Thiel 21:35 Lessons from Paul Graham 26:02 The book Sam Altman wants to write 28:37 Advice for startup founders 30:20 How Y Combinator shapes OpenAI 35:55 How Sam chose to work on AGI 37:35 Writing strategy memos at OpenAI 41:34 Why isn’t ChatGPT a better storyteller? 44:20 Sam's obsessive note-taking method 47:12 Will AI put writers out of work?

David Perell

239,731 views • 1 year ago

Sam Altman on Sora, Energy, and Building an AI Empire From GPT-5 to Sora, OpenAI has been making a dizzying amount of bets recently. It now acts as a frontier AGI research lab, a big tech product company with nearly a billion users, and a driver of the largest infrastructure buildout in history, all in one - plus, it’s made partnerships with Microsoft, Nvidia, Oracle, AMD, SoftBank, Oracle, and even the US government. We talked to Sam Altman about the core thesis bringing OpenAI’s bets together, why they released Sora, how they use models internally, the most informative evals for assessing AI progress, and where we’re going from here. 00:00 Introduction 00:41 OpenAI’s vision 08:01 Human-AI interfaces 09:28 AI scientists and scientific progress 17:52 Sam's operating lessons 28:33 Copyright and open source 43:03 AI talent wars 45:33 Advice for founders Sam Altman benahorowitz.eth Erik Torenberg
49:26

Sam Altman on Sora, Energy, and Building an AI Empire From GPT-5 to Sora, OpenAI has been making a dizzying amount of bets recently. It now acts as a frontier AGI research lab, a big tech product company with nearly a billion users, and a driver of the largest infrastructure buildout in history, all in one - plus, it’s made partnerships with Microsoft, Nvidia, Oracle, AMD, SoftBank, Oracle, and even the US government. We talked to Sam Altman about the core thesis bringing OpenAI’s bets together, why they released Sora, how they use models internally, the most informative evals for assessing AI progress, and where we’re going from here. 00:00 Introduction 00:41 OpenAI’s vision 08:01 Human-AI interfaces 09:28 AI scientists and scientific progress 17:52 Sam's operating lessons 28:33 Copyright and open source 43:03 AI talent wars 45:33 Advice for founders Sam Altman benahorowitz.eth Erik Torenberg

a16z

1,301,084 views • 10 months ago

Sam Altman says the most important future skill won’t be learning how to build AI, but learning how to use AI to do extraordinary things. He compares it to computers: most people don’t understand how hardware is built, yet they can still use a computer to produce world-changing work. He explains that progress comes from layers—first computers, now AGI, and eventually new layers built on top by people who don’t need to understand the foundations beneath them.
1:08

Sam Altman says the most important future skill won’t be learning how to build AI, but learning how to use AI to do extraordinary things. He compares it to computers: most people don’t understand how hardware is built, yet they can still use a computer to produce world-changing work. He explains that progress comes from layers—first computers, now AGI, and eventually new layers built on top by people who don’t need to understand the foundations beneath them.

Wes Roth

102,524 views • 9 months ago

Sam Altman just dropped some new ChatGPT numbers at the NYT Dealbook Summit: — 300M weekly active users — 1B messages sent daily — 1.3M US developers building on the platform But the bigger story was Sama's AGI timeline: He thinks we could the first glimpses by 2025. His prediction is that the initial impact will be subtle, but long-term changes (and the transition to superintelligence) will be "more intense than people think." More nuggets from the interview: — On relationship with Microsoft: Admitted to "some tension", but aligned on priorities — On Elon: Calls the legal situation with OpenAI "tremendously sad", and that Musk was a "mega hero" of his growing up. — Altman also doesn't think Elon would use his new political power to harm competitors, saying it would be "profoundly un-American." As always, Altman interviews never fail to provide an insightful view into the future. Full interview below:
2:48

Sam Altman just dropped some new ChatGPT numbers at the NYT Dealbook Summit: — 300M weekly active users — 1B messages sent daily — 1.3M US developers building on the platform But the bigger story was Sama's AGI timeline: He thinks we could the first glimpses by 2025. His prediction is that the initial impact will be subtle, but long-term changes (and the transition to superintelligence) will be "more intense than people think." More nuggets from the interview: — On relationship with Microsoft: Admitted to "some tension", but aligned on priorities — On Elon: Calls the legal situation with OpenAI "tremendously sad", and that Musk was a "mega hero" of his growing up. — Altman also doesn't think Elon would use his new political power to harm competitors, saying it would be "profoundly un-American." As always, Altman interviews never fail to provide an insightful view into the future. Full interview below:

Rowan Cheung

189,796 views • 1 year ago

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, on why the iPhone, the greatest consumer device ever made, is the wrong hardware for the AI era: Sam argues the iPhone's basic design wasn't made for a world where AI needs to live alongside your entire life. "I think the iPhone is currently the greatest piece of consumer hardware ever made by a lot. Like, incredible what that has done." The iPhone was designed for a pre-AI world. Sam Altman explains: "It was not meant for a world where you needed a piece of hardware that could absorb all of the context of your life. You know, you can use the phone, you can stop using the phone, you can put it in your pocket, but it's kind of like on or off." That binary, on or off, in use or in your pocket, is the core mismatch. A device that flips between active and dormant can't continuously absorb the context that a personal AGI would need to actually be useful to you. Sam uses the conversation he's having in that moment as the example: "This has been a very interesting conversation. I would love this to be referenced by my personal AGI later, but my phone is in my pocket and it's not going to understand." The vision he's pointing toward is a device that participates differently: "I would like a device that, if I wanted to, can participate and understand and know about this conversation." The shift Sam is describing is from a device you pick up and put down, to one that quietly captures the context of your life. Without that continuous context, a personal AGI can't actually be personal.
0:44

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, on why the iPhone, the greatest consumer device ever made, is the wrong hardware for the AI era: Sam argues the iPhone's basic design wasn't made for a world where AI needs to live alongside your entire life. "I think the iPhone is currently the greatest piece of consumer hardware ever made by a lot. Like, incredible what that has done." The iPhone was designed for a pre-AI world. Sam Altman explains: "It was not meant for a world where you needed a piece of hardware that could absorb all of the context of your life. You know, you can use the phone, you can stop using the phone, you can put it in your pocket, but it's kind of like on or off." That binary, on or off, in use or in your pocket, is the core mismatch. A device that flips between active and dormant can't continuously absorb the context that a personal AGI would need to actually be useful to you. Sam uses the conversation he's having in that moment as the example: "This has been a very interesting conversation. I would love this to be referenced by my personal AGI later, but my phone is in my pocket and it's not going to understand." The vision he's pointing toward is a device that participates differently: "I would like a device that, if I wanted to, can participate and understand and know about this conversation." The shift Sam is describing is from a device you pick up and put down, to one that quietly captures the context of your life. Without that continuous context, a personal AGI can't actually be personal.

Big Brain AI

25,447 views • 3 months ago

OpenAI CEO: “Goalposts keep getting moved” - if we were still using AGI definitions from 10 years ago, many would say GPT-4 is AGI. “In one year, AI will be dramatically more impressive.” He also said (surprisingly confidently - he did not hedge like usual) AGI is less than 10 years away. In the long term he’s not concerned about AI taking jobs, but he is concerned about the speed that AI will disrupt the job market. --- INTERVIEWER: What is AGI? When will it be here? And how will we know it's here? Predict how long - we'll call you in ten years? SAM ALTMAN: Less than that. We kind of define AGI as like the thing we don't have quite yet. there were a lot of people who would have ten years ago said, alright, if you could make something like GPT-4, GPT-5, maybe, that would have been an AGI. And now people are like, well, it's like a nice little chatbot or whatever. And I think that's wonderful. I think it's great that the goalposts keep getting moved, it makes us work harder. But I think we're getting close enough to whatever that AGI threshold is going to be, that we no longer get to handwave at it and the definition is going to matter. INTERVIEWER: What is the inflection point for AGI? SAM ALTMAN: I think it's going to be much more continuous than that. We're just on this beautiful exponential curve. Whenever you're on a curve like that, you look forward, it looks vertical. You look back, it looks horizontal. That's true at any point on there. So a year from now, we'll be in a dramatically more impressive place than a year ago. We were in a dramatically less impressive place. But it'll be hard to point. People will try and say, oh, it was AlphaGo that did it. It was GPT-3 that did it. It was GPT-4 that did it. But it's just brick by brick. 1 foot in front of the other, up, climbing this exponential curve. WILL AIs TAKE ALL OUR JOBS? SAM ALTMAN: Every technological revolution affects the job market. And over human history, every maybe 100 years, 150 years, half the jobs go away, totally change, whatever. I'm not afraid of that at all. In fact, I think that's good. I think that's the way of progress and we'll find new and better jobs. The thing that I think we do need to confront as a society is the speed at which this is going to happen. It seems like over two, maximum three, probably two generations, we can adapt. Society can adapt to almost any amount of job market change. But a lot of people like their jobs or they dislike change. And going to someone and saying, hey, the future will be better, I promise you, and society is going to win, but you're going to lose here. That doesn't work. That's not cool. That's not an easy message to get across. We are going to have to really do something about this transition. It is not enough to just give people a universal basic income. People need to have agency, the ability to influence this
4:02

OpenAI CEO: “Goalposts keep getting moved” - if we were still using AGI definitions from 10 years ago, many would say GPT-4 is AGI. “In one year, AI will be dramatically more impressive.” He also said (surprisingly confidently - he did not hedge like usual) AGI is less than 10 years away. In the long term he’s not concerned about AI taking jobs, but he is concerned about the speed that AI will disrupt the job market. --- INTERVIEWER: What is AGI? When will it be here? And how will we know it's here? Predict how long - we'll call you in ten years? SAM ALTMAN: Less than that. We kind of define AGI as like the thing we don't have quite yet. there were a lot of people who would have ten years ago said, alright, if you could make something like GPT-4, GPT-5, maybe, that would have been an AGI. And now people are like, well, it's like a nice little chatbot or whatever. And I think that's wonderful. I think it's great that the goalposts keep getting moved, it makes us work harder. But I think we're getting close enough to whatever that AGI threshold is going to be, that we no longer get to handwave at it and the definition is going to matter. INTERVIEWER: What is the inflection point for AGI? SAM ALTMAN: I think it's going to be much more continuous than that. We're just on this beautiful exponential curve. Whenever you're on a curve like that, you look forward, it looks vertical. You look back, it looks horizontal. That's true at any point on there. So a year from now, we'll be in a dramatically more impressive place than a year ago. We were in a dramatically less impressive place. But it'll be hard to point. People will try and say, oh, it was AlphaGo that did it. It was GPT-3 that did it. It was GPT-4 that did it. But it's just brick by brick. 1 foot in front of the other, up, climbing this exponential curve. WILL AIs TAKE ALL OUR JOBS? SAM ALTMAN: Every technological revolution affects the job market. And over human history, every maybe 100 years, 150 years, half the jobs go away, totally change, whatever. I'm not afraid of that at all. In fact, I think that's good. I think that's the way of progress and we'll find new and better jobs. The thing that I think we do need to confront as a society is the speed at which this is going to happen. It seems like over two, maximum three, probably two generations, we can adapt. Society can adapt to almost any amount of job market change. But a lot of people like their jobs or they dislike change. And going to someone and saying, hey, the future will be better, I promise you, and society is going to win, but you're going to lose here. That doesn't work. That's not cool. That's not an easy message to get across. We are going to have to really do something about this transition. It is not enough to just give people a universal basic income. People need to have agency, the ability to influence this

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

27,551 views • 2 years ago