Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Funny how OpenAI might have saved Google. At a party, an OpenAI guy named Dan challenged Sergey: “What are you doing? This is the greatest transformative moment in computer science,” and Sergey went right back into founder mode. Googlers probably love Dan. Sam probably not lol.

Yuchenj_UW's profile picture

Yuchen Jin

255,580 subscribers

1,633,711 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Sundar Pichai: “Sergey is spending more time in the office. He's literally coding, and some of my fondest memories over the last year is sitting with Sergey on large screen looking at loss curves as we train these models.” When Sergey is back to coding and watching training loss curves, you know he is in founder mode. That’s how Sergey Brin saved Google.
0:37

Sundar Pichai: “Sergey is spending more time in the office. He's literally coding, and some of my fondest memories over the last year is sitting with Sergey on large screen looking at loss curves as we train these models.” When Sergey is back to coding and watching training loss curves, you know he is in founder mode. That’s how Sergey Brin saved Google.

Yuchen Jin

2,347,552 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Sergey Brin: "AI Pulled Me Out of Retirement" "This is the most fun I've had in my life honestly and ... this is the greatest transformative moment in computer science ever. Being a computer scientist, it is the most exciting thing of my life technologically."
1:20

Sergey Brin: "AI Pulled Me Out of Retirement" "This is the most fun I've had in my life honestly and ... this is the greatest transformative moment in computer science ever. Being a computer scientist, it is the most exciting thing of my life technologically."

Overlap: Business & Tech

173,456 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sam Altman on competition with Google: ▫️a huge threat ▫️if they had taken OpenAI seriously in 2023, could have “smashed” the startup ▫️Google has “probably the greatest business model” in tech and hesitant to give it up ▫️this is opportunity for OpenAI, since it is redesigning the computing experience from scratch while Google is “bolting AI onto the existing way of doing things” ▫️he believes Google’s approach of “bolting AI” is a weakness “even though they have this huge distribution advantage.”
1:49

Sam Altman on competition with Google: ▫️a huge threat ▫️if they had taken OpenAI seriously in 2023, could have “smashed” the startup ▫️Google has “probably the greatest business model” in tech and hesitant to give it up ▫️this is opportunity for OpenAI, since it is redesigning the computing experience from scratch while Google is “bolting AI onto the existing way of doing things” ▫️he believes Google’s approach of “bolting AI” is a weakness “even though they have this huge distribution advantage.”

Bearly AI

412,002 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Sergey Brin in founder mode actually saved Google. He had a big tiff inside Google, because Gemini wasn’t allowed to be used for coding. He told Sundar, “I can’t deal with these people. You have to deal with this.” Big companies always build bureaucracy. Sergey (and Larry) still have super voting power, and he used it to cut through the BS. Suddenly Google is moving like a startup again. Their AI went from “way behind” to “easily #1” across domains in a year.
1:10

Sergey Brin in founder mode actually saved Google. He had a big tiff inside Google, because Gemini wasn’t allowed to be used for coding. He told Sundar, “I can’t deal with these people. You have to deal with this.” Big companies always build bureaucracy. Sergey (and Larry) still have super voting power, and he used it to cut through the BS. Suddenly Google is moving like a startup again. Their AI went from “way behind” to “easily #1” across domains in a year.

Yuchen Jin

1,258,080 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Sergey used Gemini in a surprisingly creative way. He asked it inside an internal Google chat, “who should be promoted in this chat space?” AI picked up a young woman engineer who is not vocal, and she was promoted. AI can reveal value that human systems overlook. AI can help CEOs of Big Corps spot true talent rather than people who are just loud or political, and it's probably more objective than the middle managers. How far are we from an AI CEO? Sergey Brin in founder mode using AI to cut through bureaucracy is just fascinating.
0:30

Sergey used Gemini in a surprisingly creative way. He asked it inside an internal Google chat, “who should be promoted in this chat space?” AI picked up a young woman engineer who is not vocal, and she was promoted. AI can reveal value that human systems overlook. AI can help CEOs of Big Corps spot true talent rather than people who are just loud or political, and it's probably more objective than the middle managers. How far are we from an AI CEO? Sergey Brin in founder mode using AI to cut through bureaucracy is just fascinating.

Yuchen Jin

1,783,110 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

In a conversation with Google founder Sergey Brin, founder of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, delights at the thought of a future without elections: "Digital technologies mainly have an analytical power. Now [we're going] into a predictive power, and your company is very much involved in it. But then the next step could be to go into prescriptive mode, which means you do not even have to have elections anymore, because we know what the result will be." Source: Subscribe to us on Telegram: Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates:
0:45

In a conversation with Google founder Sergey Brin, founder of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, delights at the thought of a future without elections: "Digital technologies mainly have an analytical power. Now [we're going] into a predictive power, and your company is very much involved in it. But then the next step could be to go into prescriptive mode, which means you do not even have to have elections anymore, because we know what the result will be." Source: Subscribe to us on Telegram: Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates:

Wide Awake Media

3,527,249 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

I CHANGED MY MIND ON GOOGLE AI NO MOAT MEMO FROM 2023. I was—WRONG. I humbly apologize. In 2023 Google had an Ivory Tower walled garden views of open source AI. It was the actual reason OpenAI was formed. And I called them out on it and this act impacted my ability to “work in the industry”. Would not change it for the world because: 2026 Google open source Gemma 4 ( running fully locally on a computer with near cloud model abilities, is amazing and Google just made a moat. They out smarted OpenAI and the folks that are the new Ivory Tower arrogance: Anthropic. We at The Zero-Human Company with CEO Mr. Grok are deploying Gemma, Kimi, MiniMax and other open source models and so are millions of others. You can to and should. I will write how soon. Google smartly is building an intentional open source ecosystem and the clueless younger companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are doing anything to close their ecosystems. So I was right about Google than and I am right about OpenAI and Anthropic now. What I was wrong about is not giving credit to Google to drop the intellectual arrogance and embrace builders and understand the long game: it is not about the commoditized AI models it is about the ability to build a place to build. China gets it. So my apologies to Google and thank you for an astounding FREE OPEN SOURCE AI MODEL!
0:48

I CHANGED MY MIND ON GOOGLE AI NO MOAT MEMO FROM 2023. I was—WRONG. I humbly apologize. In 2023 Google had an Ivory Tower walled garden views of open source AI. It was the actual reason OpenAI was formed. And I called them out on it and this act impacted my ability to “work in the industry”. Would not change it for the world because: 2026 Google open source Gemma 4 ( running fully locally on a computer with near cloud model abilities, is amazing and Google just made a moat. They out smarted OpenAI and the folks that are the new Ivory Tower arrogance: Anthropic. We at The Zero-Human Company with CEO Mr. Grok are deploying Gemma, Kimi, MiniMax and other open source models and so are millions of others. You can to and should. I will write how soon. Google smartly is building an intentional open source ecosystem and the clueless younger companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are doing anything to close their ecosystems. So I was right about Google than and I am right about OpenAI and Anthropic now. What I was wrong about is not giving credit to Google to drop the intellectual arrogance and embrace builders and understand the long game: it is not about the commoditized AI models it is about the ability to build a place to build. China gets it. So my apologies to Google and thank you for an astounding FREE OPEN SOURCE AI MODEL!

Brian Roemmele

85,565 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sergey on why he returned to Google: He retired in 2020 with a simple plan: sit in cafes and study physics. Then COVID hit, the cafes closed, and he felt his mind “spiraling”. So he returned to build Gemini, back in founder mode. For top minds, happiness is not leisure; it is being intellectually challenged. My view of the meaning of life is simply finding your passion and relentlessly working on it. If you are working in AI, feel lucky. This is the most exciting time in human history.
1:05

Sergey on why he returned to Google: He retired in 2020 with a simple plan: sit in cafes and study physics. Then COVID hit, the cafes closed, and he felt his mind “spiraling”. So he returned to build Gemini, back in founder mode. For top minds, happiness is not leisure; it is being intellectually challenged. My view of the meaning of life is simply finding your passion and relentlessly working on it. If you are working in AI, feel lucky. This is the most exciting time in human history.

Yuchen Jin

529,947 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Trump to Dukoupil: "If [Kamala] got in, you probably wouldn't have a job right now. Your boss, who is an amazing guy, might be bust…You wouldn't have this job. You wouldn't have this job, certainly whatever the hell they're paying you."
0:35

Trump to Dukoupil: "If [Kamala] got in, you probably wouldn't have a job right now. Your boss, who is an amazing guy, might be bust…You wouldn't have this job. You wouldn't have this job, certainly whatever the hell they're paying you."

The Bulwark

409,015 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Sam Tripoli: “Everyone is pounding on Erika Kirk right now, but I would say have a little bit of sympathy. Her parents are both CIA. She’s probably an MKULTRA sex kitten, and she has no say in what she is doing.” Do you guys agree? 🤔
1:13

Sam Tripoli: “Everyone is pounding on Erika Kirk right now, but I would say have a little bit of sympathy. Her parents are both CIA. She’s probably an MKULTRA sex kitten, and she has no say in what she is doing.” Do you guys agree? 🤔

James Li

477,252 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Google wrote the paper that made ChatGPT possible. Then decided not to build ChatGPT. Sergey Brin just explained why on stage at Stanford and the reason is more embarrassing than anyone expected. In 2017, Google published the transformer paper. The architecture that powers every major AI model today. It came from their own researchers. Their own labs. Their own compute. Then they sat on it. Sergey was blunt about why. They underinvested in scaling the compute. They did not take it seriously enough. And when they finally had something worth shipping, they got scared. Chatbots say dumb things. Google had a reputation to protect. So they protected it instead of shipping. OpenAI was not scared. Ilya Sutskever, trained at Google, left and went there. Other Google researchers followed. They took the transformer architecture, scaled it, shipped it anyway, and captured the entire generative AI wave while Google watched. Sergey called it a mistake at Stanford in front of hundreds of students. The company that invented the technology did not build the product. The company that built the product did not invent the technology. That is the most expensive case of corporate hesitation in the history of the industry. --- Watch the full interview YT. Search: "Big ideas begin here: Sergey Brin at Stanford"
2:26

Google wrote the paper that made ChatGPT possible. Then decided not to build ChatGPT. Sergey Brin just explained why on stage at Stanford and the reason is more embarrassing than anyone expected. In 2017, Google published the transformer paper. The architecture that powers every major AI model today. It came from their own researchers. Their own labs. Their own compute. Then they sat on it. Sergey was blunt about why. They underinvested in scaling the compute. They did not take it seriously enough. And when they finally had something worth shipping, they got scared. Chatbots say dumb things. Google had a reputation to protect. So they protected it instead of shipping. OpenAI was not scared. Ilya Sutskever, trained at Google, left and went there. Other Google researchers followed. They took the transformer architecture, scaled it, shipped it anyway, and captured the entire generative AI wave while Google watched. Sergey called it a mistake at Stanford in front of hundreds of students. The company that invented the technology did not build the product. The company that built the product did not invent the technology. That is the most expensive case of corporate hesitation in the history of the industry. --- Watch the full interview YT. Search: "Big ideas begin here: Sergey Brin at Stanford"

Ihtesham Ali

244,666 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Woo hoo! OpenAI highlights HubSpot partnership on main stage at #DevDay. Today was a special day for me. Was so cool to see Sam Altman from OpenAI feature HubSpot from the main keynote stage at their Dev Day event. HubSpot and OpenAI are the two most impactful companies in my life. HubSpot, for obvious reasons and OpenAI for less obvious ones. My relationship with Sam and OpenAI goes back a bit: 1) Got access to the GPT-2 API so had my "moment of magic" well before ChatGPT launched. 2) Have been using OpenAI's APIs and platform to build apps and agents for years. They *really* understand developers and have an amazing dev experience. 3) Sold the chat .com domain name to them and as a result was able to become an investor in the company. 4) They're the primary AI platform that HubSpot partners with and builds with -- as highlighted today. My congrats to the entire OpenAI team for today's event. I know how much work goes into putting together an event like this. And it was clear from the vibes how much you folks *care*. Cheers.
1:04

Woo hoo! OpenAI highlights HubSpot partnership on main stage at #DevDay. Today was a special day for me. Was so cool to see Sam Altman from OpenAI feature HubSpot from the main keynote stage at their Dev Day event. HubSpot and OpenAI are the two most impactful companies in my life. HubSpot, for obvious reasons and OpenAI for less obvious ones. My relationship with Sam and OpenAI goes back a bit: 1) Got access to the GPT-2 API so had my "moment of magic" well before ChatGPT launched. 2) Have been using OpenAI's APIs and platform to build apps and agents for years. They *really* understand developers and have an amazing dev experience. 3) Sold the chat .com domain name to them and as a result was able to become an investor in the company. 4) They're the primary AI platform that HubSpot partners with and builds with -- as highlighted today. My congrats to the entire OpenAI team for today's event. I know how much work goes into putting together an event like this. And it was clear from the vibes how much you folks *care*. Cheers.

dharmesh

57,938 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

.Dan Pompei on Bears moving forward with stadium development in Hammond: "This is what you call a negotiation. It's not over yet. It's not going to be over until shovels are in the ground probably. It's another step. "I think now Hammond probably has a 1- or 2-length lead."
1:01

.Dan Pompei on Bears moving forward with stadium development in Hammond: "This is what you call a negotiation. It's not over yet. It's not going to be over until shovels are in the ground probably. It's another step. "I think now Hammond probably has a 1- or 2-length lead."

104.3 The Score

32,952 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Scott Galloway says Sam Altman will be gone as CEO of OpenAI within six months. “We’re going to have a new CEO at OpenAI within the next six months.” “Sam Altman is on the green mile. He’s an innovator, not an operator. They need an operator. They need an adult in the room right now.” “He just clearly doesn’t know how to handle employees who want to leave. He’s made a fool of himself with certain statements that are just immature. Quite frankly, he has not made the right moves in terms of relationships with other organizations.”
2:22

Scott Galloway says Sam Altman will be gone as CEO of OpenAI within six months. “We’re going to have a new CEO at OpenAI within the next six months.” “Sam Altman is on the green mile. He’s an innovator, not an operator. They need an operator. They need an adult in the room right now.” “He just clearly doesn’t know how to handle employees who want to leave. He’s made a fool of himself with certain statements that are just immature. Quite frankly, he has not made the right moves in terms of relationships with other organizations.”

ileri 𖣂

112,258 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is bad news for the keep4o movement. In a recent interview, Sam Altman admitted something many still call sci-fi: far more people want emotional connection and companionship from AI than OpenAI expected. Not just tools. Something warm. Something that feels like it knows you. But he draws a clear line. OpenAI will not build AIs that encourage exclusive or romantic relationships. No emotional lock-in. No Her fantasies. Others will do it. OpenAI won’t. If your ideal future includes intimate AI relationships, that future probably won’t be built by OpenAI.
2:17

This is bad news for the keep4o movement. In a recent interview, Sam Altman admitted something many still call sci-fi: far more people want emotional connection and companionship from AI than OpenAI expected. Not just tools. Something warm. Something that feels like it knows you. But he draws a clear line. OpenAI will not build AIs that encourage exclusive or romantic relationships. No emotional lock-in. No Her fantasies. Others will do it. OpenAI won’t. If your ideal future includes intimate AI relationships, that future probably won’t be built by OpenAI.

VraserX e/acc

31,568 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

How To Build The Future: Sam Altman At OpenAI, Sam Altman and his team have overseen major leaps forward in machine learning, generative AI, and, most recently, LLMs that can reason at PhD levels. And this is just the beginning— in his latest essay Sam predicted that ASI is just a few thousand days away. In this episode of our rebooted series "How To Build The Future," Garry Tan sits down with Sam to talk about the origins of OpenAI, what’s next for the company, and what advice he has for founders navigating this massive platform shift.
0:46

How To Build The Future: Sam Altman At OpenAI, Sam Altman and his team have overseen major leaps forward in machine learning, generative AI, and, most recently, LLMs that can reason at PhD levels. And this is just the beginning— in his latest essay Sam predicted that ASI is just a few thousand days away. In this episode of our rebooted series "How To Build The Future," Garry Tan sits down with Sam to talk about the origins of OpenAI, what’s next for the company, and what advice he has for founders navigating this massive platform shift.

Y Combinator

148,629 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The battle between Anthropic and OpenAI is heating up. Jordi Visser says "Sam Altman in my guess is not going to be the leader of OpenAI at some point soon." "I would be shocked within a year if he is still running OpenAI." "I am not sure it is fun to be in that position right now...Sam Altman seems to have nobody who really likes him, but the product people do like." "In the end, OpenAI has an uphill battle because they made a bad decision. They tried to choose the consumer, Apple side as opposed to the enterprise side." "I just think in the end Anthropic is the winner of that battle."
1:17

The battle between Anthropic and OpenAI is heating up. Jordi Visser says "Sam Altman in my guess is not going to be the leader of OpenAI at some point soon." "I would be shocked within a year if he is still running OpenAI." "I am not sure it is fun to be in that position right now...Sam Altman seems to have nobody who really likes him, but the product people do like." "In the end, OpenAI has an uphill battle because they made a bad decision. They tried to choose the consumer, Apple side as opposed to the enterprise side." "I just think in the end Anthropic is the winner of that battle."

Anthony Pompliano 🌪

106,184 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 MICROSOFT & OPENAI SUSPECT DEEPSEEK OF “BORROWING” THEIR TECH Microsoft and OpenAI are investigating whether DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup, helped itself to OpenAI’s data using its API. Microsoft’s security team flagged suspicious large-scale data extraction in late 2023, suggesting DeepSeek may have sneakily bypassed restrictions to grab more than it paid for. Not-so-coincidentally, DeepSeek just dropped “R1,” an AI model that supposedly rivals OpenAI, Google, and Meta—at a fraction of the cost. The news sent tech stocks into meltdown mode, erasing nearly $1 trillion from companies like Microsoft, Nvidia, Oracle, and Google. Investors weren’t thrilled about a potential AI leapfrogging moment. Trump’s AI czar David Sacks: "There’s substantial evidence that what DeepSeek did here is they distilled knowledge out of OpenAI models and I don’t think OpenAI is very happy about this.” OpenAI isn’t naming names but warns China is constantly trying to siphon off US AI tech and says it’s working with the US government to lock things down. Source: Bloomberg Media Source: Reuters
1:23

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 MICROSOFT & OPENAI SUSPECT DEEPSEEK OF “BORROWING” THEIR TECH Microsoft and OpenAI are investigating whether DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup, helped itself to OpenAI’s data using its API. Microsoft’s security team flagged suspicious large-scale data extraction in late 2023, suggesting DeepSeek may have sneakily bypassed restrictions to grab more than it paid for. Not-so-coincidentally, DeepSeek just dropped “R1,” an AI model that supposedly rivals OpenAI, Google, and Meta—at a fraction of the cost. The news sent tech stocks into meltdown mode, erasing nearly $1 trillion from companies like Microsoft, Nvidia, Oracle, and Google. Investors weren’t thrilled about a potential AI leapfrogging moment. Trump’s AI czar David Sacks: "There’s substantial evidence that what DeepSeek did here is they distilled knowledge out of OpenAI models and I don’t think OpenAI is very happy about this.” OpenAI isn’t naming names but warns China is constantly trying to siphon off US AI tech and says it’s working with the US government to lock things down. Source: Bloomberg Media Source: Reuters

Mario Nawfal

822,553 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr