Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Google isn’t just a search engine anymore. People still go there to ask questions. But now Google doesn’t just give them links. It reads the websites, pulls the information together, and gives them the answer right on the page. So your job has changed. You’re not just trying to...

neilpatel's profile picture

Neil Patel

477,491 subscribers

13,795 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Google just gave away the real secret to showing up in AI answers. And honestly, it contradicts a lot of the viral vidoes you’ve been watching. Because Google basically said: stop obsessing over tricks like llms.txt, PerfectSchema, and all these technical hacks people are trying to sell you. That’s not what gets you cited. Here’s what does. AI doesn’t need to cite generic content. If your article says the same thing as everyone else, the AI can answer the question without you. But if your content has something original. A real test, a number you measured, a customer insight, a process you actually use, now the AI has a reason to reference you. That’s the difference between commodity content and non-commodity content. But here’s where most people get stuck. They don’t know what to create first. That’s why tools like AnswerThePublic are useful. You can see the real questions people are already asking around your topic, then use those questions as the starting point. But don’t just answer them generically. Add something only you know. Your data. Your experience. Your customer conversations. Your examples. Because in the AI era, the goal isn’t just to write content. It’s to become the source AI wants to cite.
1:02

Google just gave away the real secret to showing up in AI answers. And honestly, it contradicts a lot of the viral vidoes you’ve been watching. Because Google basically said: stop obsessing over tricks like llms.txt, PerfectSchema, and all these technical hacks people are trying to sell you. That’s not what gets you cited. Here’s what does. AI doesn’t need to cite generic content. If your article says the same thing as everyone else, the AI can answer the question without you. But if your content has something original. A real test, a number you measured, a customer insight, a process you actually use, now the AI has a reason to reference you. That’s the difference between commodity content and non-commodity content. But here’s where most people get stuck. They don’t know what to create first. That’s why tools like AnswerThePublic are useful. You can see the real questions people are already asking around your topic, then use those questions as the starting point. But don’t just answer them generically. Add something only you know. Your data. Your experience. Your customer conversations. Your examples. Because in the AI era, the goal isn’t just to write content. It’s to become the source AI wants to cite.

Neil Patel

16,545 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

AI Overviews are showing up for more and more searches. And when they do, fewer people click. That’s the part everyone is panicking about. Google gives the answer right there, so the user doesn’t always need to visit your site. But SEO is not dead. The game just changed. Because now your job is not only to rank on Google. Your job is to become the source AI trusts enough to recommend. That means showing up in Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and all the other places people are asking questions. This is why tools like Ubersuggest matter even more now. You can use it to see what people are searching for, what questions they’re asking, what competitors rank for, and where your content gaps are. Then you turn that into better answers. Not generic blog posts. Real expertise. Real examples. Clear explanations. Content that both humans and AI can understand, trust, and cite. And your website still matters because that’s where attention turns into action. AI can summarize information. But it does not close the deal for you. It does not build the relationship. It does not replace your proof, your offer, or your brand. So save this action plan.
1:03

AI Overviews are showing up for more and more searches. And when they do, fewer people click. That’s the part everyone is panicking about. Google gives the answer right there, so the user doesn’t always need to visit your site. But SEO is not dead. The game just changed. Because now your job is not only to rank on Google. Your job is to become the source AI trusts enough to recommend. That means showing up in Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and all the other places people are asking questions. This is why tools like Ubersuggest matter even more now. You can use it to see what people are searching for, what questions they’re asking, what competitors rank for, and where your content gaps are. Then you turn that into better answers. Not generic blog posts. Real expertise. Real examples. Clear explanations. Content that both humans and AI can understand, trust, and cite. And your website still matters because that’s where attention turns into action. AI can summarize information. But it does not close the deal for you. It does not build the relationship. It does not replace your proof, your offer, or your brand. So save this action plan.

Neil Patel

10,183 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

Blogging used to be simple. Write something helpful, rank on Google, and wake up to traffic. That worked for a long time. Then AI got good at summarizing it. A recent study tracked 100 once-successful blogs. The median one lost 85% of its Google traffic. But the split is what matters. The blogs getting destroyed right now are mostly describing things “best budgeting apps,” “how to start a podcast,” “top tools in 2026.” The ones still growing? They’re proving something. They didn’t write another roundup. They built the thing, tested it for real, spent the money, made the mistake, and showed what actually happened. That’s the new filter. Before you create your next piece of content, look at what people are searching for using then you can create content for what people actually want to know about. Then ask yourself one question: Can AI answer this without me? If the answer is yes, you’re writing something a machine can already summarize better and faster than you. If the answer is no, if it requires your experience, your specific results, your data, or your actual outcome that’s where the opportunity is. The future of content isn’t more articles. It’s proof that can’t be faked.
1:07

Blogging used to be simple. Write something helpful, rank on Google, and wake up to traffic. That worked for a long time. Then AI got good at summarizing it. A recent study tracked 100 once-successful blogs. The median one lost 85% of its Google traffic. But the split is what matters. The blogs getting destroyed right now are mostly describing things “best budgeting apps,” “how to start a podcast,” “top tools in 2026.” The ones still growing? They’re proving something. They didn’t write another roundup. They built the thing, tested it for real, spent the money, made the mistake, and showed what actually happened. That’s the new filter. Before you create your next piece of content, look at what people are searching for using then you can create content for what people actually want to know about. Then ask yourself one question: Can AI answer this without me? If the answer is yes, you’re writing something a machine can already summarize better and faster than you. If the answer is no, if it requires your experience, your specific results, your data, or your actual outcome that’s where the opportunity is. The future of content isn’t more articles. It’s proof that can’t be faked.

Neil Patel

11,636 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Talarico: When I get tough questions, I answer them. When Ken Paxton gets tough questions, he runs away, literally runs away from reporters, from voters, from anyone asking hard questions. If you've given an Epstein style sweetheart deal to an admitted child predator, you should have to answer the public's questions. If you were reported to the FBI for bribery by your own staff, you should have to answer the public's questions. If you've become a multi-millionaire on a government salary and now own 15 homes on the public's dime, then you should have to answer the public's questions. I get it, if I had Ken Paxton's record of corruption, I wouldn't want to answer these questions either. But he's asking for your vote. He is asking for your trust. And the people of Texas deserve answers. So I've challenged Ken Paxton to these three televised debates. The networks have already set the dates and the times and the locations. We're just waiting on Ken Paxton. I'm not afraid of tough questions. We'll see if Ken Paxton can say the same.
2:21

Talarico: When I get tough questions, I answer them. When Ken Paxton gets tough questions, he runs away, literally runs away from reporters, from voters, from anyone asking hard questions. If you've given an Epstein style sweetheart deal to an admitted child predator, you should have to answer the public's questions. If you were reported to the FBI for bribery by your own staff, you should have to answer the public's questions. If you've become a multi-millionaire on a government salary and now own 15 homes on the public's dime, then you should have to answer the public's questions. I get it, if I had Ken Paxton's record of corruption, I wouldn't want to answer these questions either. But he's asking for your vote. He is asking for your trust. And the people of Texas deserve answers. So I've challenged Ken Paxton to these three televised debates. The networks have already set the dates and the times and the locations. We're just waiting on Ken Paxton. I'm not afraid of tough questions. We'll see if Ken Paxton can say the same.

Acyn

132,038 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

“You say that you’re seeking truth and asking questions, but you’re actually just outsourcing your critical thinking and your question asking to someone else. And you’re never really asking questions. You’re never saying, ‘does that make sense? or ‘what could be the other side of that story?’ or ‘is there an alternative explanation for that?’” All of this. Also, please pray for Allie Beth during this time. The Great Accuser is out for blood.
2:57

“You say that you’re seeking truth and asking questions, but you’re actually just outsourcing your critical thinking and your question asking to someone else. And you’re never really asking questions. You’re never saying, ‘does that make sense? or ‘what could be the other side of that story?’ or ‘is there an alternative explanation for that?’” All of this. Also, please pray for Allie Beth during this time. The Great Accuser is out for blood.

Natalie Jean Beisner

49,701 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Sarah Guo (Conviction) says founders fear the wrong thing, because a giant like Google only ever has one A-team and your product is its 27th priority. "One really important thing for founders to think about is, who are you really competing with? If you are competing with Google Search and Google Ads, you're competing with the A-team at Google. They're pretty good, right? They do know how to do that stuff... But the vast majority of products that any large incumbent has is not staffed by the A-team, because there's only one A-team, right? And so if your product is the 27th priority for Google, it's actually not that scary."
0:37

Sarah Guo (Conviction) says founders fear the wrong thing, because a giant like Google only ever has one A-team and your product is its 27th priority. "One really important thing for founders to think about is, who are you really competing with? If you are competing with Google Search and Google Ads, you're competing with the A-team at Google. They're pretty good, right? They do know how to do that stuff... But the vast majority of products that any large incumbent has is not staffed by the A-team, because there's only one A-team, right? And so if your product is the 27th priority for Google, it's actually not that scary."

Fireside Alpha

274,024 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

we built the most advanced ai visibility platform. why? because brands are showing up on google but getting ignored by chatgpt, perplexity, and ai overviews. that’s a big problem. you don’t just need to rank — you need to exist where users are actually asking questions now. this tool helps you: – track where your or your client's brand gets mentioned (or not) – see your ai visibility % + market share – gives drill-down views into things like prompts, answers, citations and more – benchmark competitors and then helps you take action by: – helping you find missing citations and prompts – generating GEO+SEO optimized content to fill the gaps – optimizing existing content basically: everything google analytics + ahrefs won’t show you. 🔗 comment "AI visibility" in the comment to get access
10:01

we built the most advanced ai visibility platform. why? because brands are showing up on google but getting ignored by chatgpt, perplexity, and ai overviews. that’s a big problem. you don’t just need to rank — you need to exist where users are actually asking questions now. this tool helps you: – track where your or your client's brand gets mentioned (or not) – see your ai visibility % + market share – gives drill-down views into things like prompts, answers, citations and more – benchmark competitors and then helps you take action by: – helping you find missing citations and prompts – generating GEO+SEO optimized content to fill the gaps – optimizing existing content basically: everything google analytics + ahrefs won’t show you. 🔗 comment "AI visibility" in the comment to get access

Samanyou Garg

354,796 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The biggest losers in the Google traffic collapse aren't the people who ignored SEO. They're the people who mastered it. For years, businesses built everything around answering questions Google could rank, then Google learned to answer those questions itself. But losing traffic is just the symptom. The real problem is that most companies never owned their audience, they rented it from Google, and the landlord just changed the rules. In this video I break down why the old model is breaking, who gets hit hardest, and why HubSpot could lose most of its organic traffic and still grow revenue. Because clicks and demand were never the same thing, and the brand is the part you actually keep.
9:41

The biggest losers in the Google traffic collapse aren't the people who ignored SEO. They're the people who mastered it. For years, businesses built everything around answering questions Google could rank, then Google learned to answer those questions itself. But losing traffic is just the symptom. The real problem is that most companies never owned their audience, they rented it from Google, and the landlord just changed the rules. In this video I break down why the old model is breaking, who gets hit hardest, and why HubSpot could lose most of its organic traffic and still grow revenue. Because clicks and demand were never the same thing, and the brand is the part you actually keep.

Neil Patel

15,996 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

The internet is both a boon and a curse. So let’s make it boon. There are hundreds of pages on Insta where such reels are uploaded. They try to make us realize that there are real issues that need to be addressed. It doesn’t matter whether Nehru was a liar or whether the RSS participated in the freedom struggle. What matters is the current situation. We must ask questions of those who are responsible for it. Your MP, your MLA, your DM, your Pradhan, and your Parshad are responsible. They will continue to loot you until you start questioning them. So use your basic rights. Ask questions of those in power. Ask them what they are doing with your tax money. This is our country, and we cannot leave it in the hands of corrupt politicians and babus. Be your own voice. Use the internet and become the voice of others too. Show them your power and remind them that you are more than just a vote.
0:57

The internet is both a boon and a curse. So let’s make it boon. There are hundreds of pages on Insta where such reels are uploaded. They try to make us realize that there are real issues that need to be addressed. It doesn’t matter whether Nehru was a liar or whether the RSS participated in the freedom struggle. What matters is the current situation. We must ask questions of those who are responsible for it. Your MP, your MLA, your DM, your Pradhan, and your Parshad are responsible. They will continue to loot you until you start questioning them. So use your basic rights. Ask questions of those in power. Ask them what they are doing with your tax money. This is our country, and we cannot leave it in the hands of corrupt politicians and babus. Be your own voice. Use the internet and become the voice of others too. Show them your power and remind them that you are more than just a vote.

कुंभकरण

25,833 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

“What are you using your certificate for ? It’s not by talking, English does not show intelligence, it’s just a language. That degree you have, to what degree is the use of your degree ? In Nigeria, we just prioritize too much wrong things” —Kokopee responded back to people asking him questions
2:59

“What are you using your certificate for ? It’s not by talking, English does not show intelligence, it’s just a language. That degree you have, to what degree is the use of your degree ? In Nigeria, we just prioritize too much wrong things” —Kokopee responded back to people asking him questions

Dami’ Adenuga

67,925 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

.James Talarico: Ken Paxton has not accepted any of these debates yet. When I get tough questions, I answer them. When Ken Paxton gets tough questions, he runs away — literally runs away from reporters, from voters, from anyone asking hard questions. If you've given an Epstein-style sweetheart deal to an admitted child predator, you should have to answer the public's questions. If you were reported to the FBI for bribery by your own staff, you should have to answer the public's questions. If you become a multi-millionaire on a government salary and now own 15 homes on the public's dime, then you should have to answer the public's questions. I get it. If I had Ken Paxton's record of corruption, I wouldn't want to answer these questions either. But he's asking for your vote and your trust — and the people of Texas deserve answers. So I've challenged Ken Paxton to these 3 televised debates. The networks have already set the dates and the times and the locations. We're just waiting on Ken Paxton. I'm not afraid of tough questions. We'll see if Ken Paxton can say the same.
1:45

.James Talarico: Ken Paxton has not accepted any of these debates yet. When I get tough questions, I answer them. When Ken Paxton gets tough questions, he runs away — literally runs away from reporters, from voters, from anyone asking hard questions. If you've given an Epstein-style sweetheart deal to an admitted child predator, you should have to answer the public's questions. If you were reported to the FBI for bribery by your own staff, you should have to answer the public's questions. If you become a multi-millionaire on a government salary and now own 15 homes on the public's dime, then you should have to answer the public's questions. I get it. If I had Ken Paxton's record of corruption, I wouldn't want to answer these questions either. But he's asking for your vote and your trust — and the people of Texas deserve answers. So I've challenged Ken Paxton to these 3 televised debates. The networks have already set the dates and the times and the locations. We're just waiting on Ken Paxton. I'm not afraid of tough questions. We'll see if Ken Paxton can say the same.

Team Talarico

34,680 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

SOMEONE VIBE CODED A CHROME EXTENSION THAT DISGUISES CLAUDE AS A GOOGLE DOC SO YOU CAN USE AI IN PUBLIC it wraps ai in a fake google docs interface, so on your screen it just looks like youre typing a document, not prompting a chatbot what it does: > works with chatgpt and claude > you just type your question like a normal line in a doc and the answer comes back right there on the page > microsoft word and notion style themes too, so you can pick your disguise > rebuilt to properly support multiple ai models behind the doc > the google docs look is the default its a chrome extension called gptdisguise this is genius. a lot of people are embarrassed to be seen using ai in public (school, work, etc). someone just built the fix.
0:31

SOMEONE VIBE CODED A CHROME EXTENSION THAT DISGUISES CLAUDE AS A GOOGLE DOC SO YOU CAN USE AI IN PUBLIC it wraps ai in a fake google docs interface, so on your screen it just looks like youre typing a document, not prompting a chatbot what it does: > works with chatgpt and claude > you just type your question like a normal line in a doc and the answer comes back right there on the page > microsoft word and notion style themes too, so you can pick your disguise > rebuilt to properly support multiple ai models behind the doc > the google docs look is the default its a chrome extension called gptdisguise this is genius. a lot of people are embarrassed to be seen using ai in public (school, work, etc). someone just built the fix.

Om Patel

1,694,089 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

AI Mode expands the types of questions you can ask, so you can search anything, effortlessly. We’re finding that people are using AI Mode for more complicated tasks, like comparisons and how-tos. And they’re asking longer, more open-ended questions to get to the heart of what they’re looking for. Opt-in via Labs to try it today →
1:37

AI Mode expands the types of questions you can ask, so you can search anything, effortlessly. We’re finding that people are using AI Mode for more complicated tasks, like comparisons and how-tos. And they’re asking longer, more open-ended questions to get to the heart of what they’re looking for. Opt-in via Labs to try it today →

Google

90,716 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The Biggest Opportunity in Consumer AI: Google Going Full OpenClaw David Sacks: “Google is going to compete very vigorously for the consumer because it is existential to them. It's very clear that search and AI chat are kind of merging into one space. I also think that Google is in an outstanding position to do the whole OpenClaw thing because they already have access to your calendar, your documents, your email. The agent doesn't really have to earn your trust because you already trust Google with all of your stuff.” Chamath Palihapitiya: “They're the only one that has so much free cash flow that they can almost view it as two separate companies, which it effectively is. GCP over here runs the enterprise play, and then Google Consumer over here runs the consumer chatbot play. And they can keep them segregated. That's so much harder for a startup to do because on top of just keeping everybody organized, you have the financing problem of constantly having to raise more money because you don't yet have a profit engine that spits out cash. They're probably the only one. And you can see it in the valuations. People believe the durability of Google more than they believe the durability of anything else.” @jason: “Google has announced Google Workspace Studio to do AI automation, and people are playing with it already. So they have joined the OpenClaw party.”
1:07

The Biggest Opportunity in Consumer AI: Google Going Full OpenClaw David Sacks: “Google is going to compete very vigorously for the consumer because it is existential to them. It's very clear that search and AI chat are kind of merging into one space. I also think that Google is in an outstanding position to do the whole OpenClaw thing because they already have access to your calendar, your documents, your email. The agent doesn't really have to earn your trust because you already trust Google with all of your stuff.” Chamath Palihapitiya: “They're the only one that has so much free cash flow that they can almost view it as two separate companies, which it effectively is. GCP over here runs the enterprise play, and then Google Consumer over here runs the consumer chatbot play. And they can keep them segregated. That's so much harder for a startup to do because on top of just keeping everybody organized, you have the financing problem of constantly having to raise more money because you don't yet have a profit engine that spits out cash. They're probably the only one. And you can see it in the valuations. People believe the durability of Google more than they believe the durability of anything else.” @jason: “Google has announced Google Workspace Studio to do AI automation, and people are playing with it already. So they have joined the OpenClaw party.”

The All-In Podcast

75,225 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Google is making $62 billion a quarter destroying the websites it NEEDS to survive. This is literally a death spiral that ends with Google killing itself. Let me explain what's going on... Google added AI summaries to the top of every search result in 2024. When you Google something now, the answer sits right there on Google's page. You never have to click anywhere. Google took the information from someone else's website, summarized it, and kept you inside Google's ecosystem. The result: 60% of all Google searches now end without a single click to any website. Small publishers lost 60% of their traffic in one year. Medium publishers lost 47%. Even the biggest names in media, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Business Insider, all saw traffic fall between 22% and 55%. The Axios CEO called it "a referral extinction event for the ad-supported web." Google's response to all of this was to tell publishers they can "opt out" of having their content summarized. But opting out also REMOVES your description from normal search results. So the choice Google gives you is let us steal your content for free, or become invisible on the internet. That's extortion. The Washington Post laid off another round of journalists this year because of it. Stereogum, one of the most respected music publications on the internet, had to BEG readers for donations. Business Insider cut 21% of its staff. Dozens of smaller publishers have shut down entirely. The people who actually CREATE the information Google summarizes are going bankrupt while Google posts record revenue. But here's where this gets interesting and where everyone stops thinking: Google's AI summaries are only as good as the content they summarize. If the publishers who write the original articles, run the original investigations, and create the original data go out of business, there is nothing left for Google to summarize. The AI starts recycling old information, the answers get stale, the quality drops, and users start noticing that Google's summaries are increasingly wrong, outdated, or useless. Google is essentially strip-mining the internet for short-term revenue. They are extracting all the value from content creators without paying for it, driving those creators out of business, and then wondering why the quality of their own product is declining. This is exactly what Napster did to the music industry in the early 2000s: Made content free, creators went broke, and quality collapsed. It took a decade to rebuild. Google is doing the same thing to the entire internet at 100x the scale. Rolling Stone, Variety, Deadline, The Hollywood Reporter, and Billboard are now suing Google for antitrust violations. Chegg, the education platform, lost 49% of its traffic and is suing too. The UK's competition authority just ordered Google to let publishers opt out without being punished. The DOJ already ruled Google is an illegal monopoly. And Google's defense in court is genuinely unbelievable. They argue that publishers CHOOSE to let Google index their content and can leave anytime they want. That's like saying you choose to pay protection money to the mob because technically you could close your business and move to another city. Google controls 90% of search. Leaving Google means leaving the internet. Meanwhile Google is investing billions in custom AI chips to make these summaries cheaper at scale. Every quarter the problem gets worse. The internet as we've known it for 25 years ran on a simple deal: Publishers make content. Google sends traffic. Advertisers pay for the traffic. Everyone wins. But Google just BROKE that deal and kept all the money.
4:13

Google is making $62 billion a quarter destroying the websites it NEEDS to survive. This is literally a death spiral that ends with Google killing itself. Let me explain what's going on... Google added AI summaries to the top of every search result in 2024. When you Google something now, the answer sits right there on Google's page. You never have to click anywhere. Google took the information from someone else's website, summarized it, and kept you inside Google's ecosystem. The result: 60% of all Google searches now end without a single click to any website. Small publishers lost 60% of their traffic in one year. Medium publishers lost 47%. Even the biggest names in media, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Business Insider, all saw traffic fall between 22% and 55%. The Axios CEO called it "a referral extinction event for the ad-supported web." Google's response to all of this was to tell publishers they can "opt out" of having their content summarized. But opting out also REMOVES your description from normal search results. So the choice Google gives you is let us steal your content for free, or become invisible on the internet. That's extortion. The Washington Post laid off another round of journalists this year because of it. Stereogum, one of the most respected music publications on the internet, had to BEG readers for donations. Business Insider cut 21% of its staff. Dozens of smaller publishers have shut down entirely. The people who actually CREATE the information Google summarizes are going bankrupt while Google posts record revenue. But here's where this gets interesting and where everyone stops thinking: Google's AI summaries are only as good as the content they summarize. If the publishers who write the original articles, run the original investigations, and create the original data go out of business, there is nothing left for Google to summarize. The AI starts recycling old information, the answers get stale, the quality drops, and users start noticing that Google's summaries are increasingly wrong, outdated, or useless. Google is essentially strip-mining the internet for short-term revenue. They are extracting all the value from content creators without paying for it, driving those creators out of business, and then wondering why the quality of their own product is declining. This is exactly what Napster did to the music industry in the early 2000s: Made content free, creators went broke, and quality collapsed. It took a decade to rebuild. Google is doing the same thing to the entire internet at 100x the scale. Rolling Stone, Variety, Deadline, The Hollywood Reporter, and Billboard are now suing Google for antitrust violations. Chegg, the education platform, lost 49% of its traffic and is suing too. The UK's competition authority just ordered Google to let publishers opt out without being punished. The DOJ already ruled Google is an illegal monopoly. And Google's defense in court is genuinely unbelievable. They argue that publishers CHOOSE to let Google index their content and can leave anytime they want. That's like saying you choose to pay protection money to the mob because technically you could close your business and move to another city. Google controls 90% of search. Leaving Google means leaving the internet. Meanwhile Google is investing billions in custom AI chips to make these summaries cheaper at scale. Every quarter the problem gets worse. The internet as we've known it for 25 years ran on a simple deal: Publishers make content. Google sends traffic. Advertisers pay for the traffic. Everyone wins. But Google just BROKE that deal and kept all the money.

Ricardo

250,784 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The next version of SEO isn’t about ranking number one. It’s about what AI says about you when someone asks. Because Google, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, they’re not just showing links anymore. They’re forming opinions. They’re comparing brands. They’re deciding who sounds credible, who sounds risky, who gets recommended, and who gets ignored. That means your biggest search problem in 2027 might not be that you don’t show up. It might be that you show up wrong. Maybe AI describes your competitor as the trusted expert… and describes you as generic. Maybe it mentions your brand… but the sentiment is neutral while your competitor is glowing. Maybe it pulls from old reviews, outdated articles, weak bios, messy positioning, or random third-party pages you didn’t even know were shaping your reputation. That’s the part most businesses are missing. AI search visibility is not just a traffic game. It’s a reputation game. And that’s why we added the Sentiment tab inside Ubersuggest’s AI Search Visibility tool. It doesn’t just track whether your brand appears across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Google AI. It shows how those engines describe you. Positive, neutral, or negative. And it charts that sentiment over time against your competitors. So now you can answer the question that actually matters: Not just, “Am I showing up in AI answers?” But, “What is AI actually saying about me?”
1:05

The next version of SEO isn’t about ranking number one. It’s about what AI says about you when someone asks. Because Google, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, they’re not just showing links anymore. They’re forming opinions. They’re comparing brands. They’re deciding who sounds credible, who sounds risky, who gets recommended, and who gets ignored. That means your biggest search problem in 2027 might not be that you don’t show up. It might be that you show up wrong. Maybe AI describes your competitor as the trusted expert… and describes you as generic. Maybe it mentions your brand… but the sentiment is neutral while your competitor is glowing. Maybe it pulls from old reviews, outdated articles, weak bios, messy positioning, or random third-party pages you didn’t even know were shaping your reputation. That’s the part most businesses are missing. AI search visibility is not just a traffic game. It’s a reputation game. And that’s why we added the Sentiment tab inside Ubersuggest’s AI Search Visibility tool. It doesn’t just track whether your brand appears across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Google AI. It shows how those engines describe you. Positive, neutral, or negative. And it charts that sentiment over time against your competitors. So now you can answer the question that actually matters: Not just, “Am I showing up in AI answers?” But, “What is AI actually saying about me?”

Neil Patel

16,719 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

Most developers can't explain how Single Sign-On (SSO) works. ​ This was one of my favorite questions during technical interviews. I love to ask about it because it's not a trivial topic. ​ Here is a 5-minute overview of how Single Sign-On works. ​ We all hate passwords; the less we use them, the better, and SSO helps with that. ​ When you log in to Google once and visit YouTube, Gmail, Drive, and any other connected service without re-entering your password, three players are working behind the scenes: ​ • A user trying to access an application. You, in this case. • The application you want to access. For example, YouTube. • An Identity Provider (IDP) that will verify your identity. Google, in this case. ​ Here is what happens when you try to access one application for the first time: ​ 1. You try to log in to YouTube, and the application redirects you to the Identity Provider (IDP) for authentication. ​ 2. The IDP (Google) checks your credentials and confirms your identity. It creates a new session for you on its server and sets a session cookie in your browser. ​ 3. The IDP also creates a token for YouTube—a small piece of data that contains information about your identity. ​ 4. Your browser grabs the token and presents it to YouTube. ​ 5. YouTube checks the token, and if it is valid, lets you in. ​ But then you want to access Google Drive: ​ 1. You go to Google Drive, and the application redirects you to the IDP. ​ 2. The IDP recognizes that you are still logged in because you have the session cookie. It doesn't need to ask for your credentials. ​ 3. Instead, the IDP generates a new token for Drive. ​ 4. Your browser grabs the token and presents it to Google Drive. If the token is valid, Drive lets you in. ​ You can now access multiple applications without re-entering your password. This is probably one of the best things we've invented since sliced bread! ​ But, of course, implementing Single Sign-On is a nightmare! If you are a developer, don't try to reinvent the wheel. I've been implementing SSO since dinosaurs were around, and I can tell you you want to check out Auth0. ​ Auth0 makes implementing SSO 100x easier. They just updated their free plan, and you get a lot without having to pay a single cent. 25,000 monthly active users, unlimited social connections, and you can go to production with custom domains. FOR FREE! ​ They are sponsoring this post. To save your time, keep your sanity, and have a really solid and secure solution, head over to their website: ​
4:57

Most developers can't explain how Single Sign-On (SSO) works. ​ This was one of my favorite questions during technical interviews. I love to ask about it because it's not a trivial topic. ​ Here is a 5-minute overview of how Single Sign-On works. ​ We all hate passwords; the less we use them, the better, and SSO helps with that. ​ When you log in to Google once and visit YouTube, Gmail, Drive, and any other connected service without re-entering your password, three players are working behind the scenes: ​ • A user trying to access an application. You, in this case. • The application you want to access. For example, YouTube. • An Identity Provider (IDP) that will verify your identity. Google, in this case. ​ Here is what happens when you try to access one application for the first time: ​ 1. You try to log in to YouTube, and the application redirects you to the Identity Provider (IDP) for authentication. ​ 2. The IDP (Google) checks your credentials and confirms your identity. It creates a new session for you on its server and sets a session cookie in your browser. ​ 3. The IDP also creates a token for YouTube—a small piece of data that contains information about your identity. ​ 4. Your browser grabs the token and presents it to YouTube. ​ 5. YouTube checks the token, and if it is valid, lets you in. ​ But then you want to access Google Drive: ​ 1. You go to Google Drive, and the application redirects you to the IDP. ​ 2. The IDP recognizes that you are still logged in because you have the session cookie. It doesn't need to ask for your credentials. ​ 3. Instead, the IDP generates a new token for Drive. ​ 4. Your browser grabs the token and presents it to Google Drive. If the token is valid, Drive lets you in. ​ You can now access multiple applications without re-entering your password. This is probably one of the best things we've invented since sliced bread! ​ But, of course, implementing Single Sign-On is a nightmare! If you are a developer, don't try to reinvent the wheel. I've been implementing SSO since dinosaurs were around, and I can tell you you want to check out Auth0. ​ Auth0 makes implementing SSO 100x easier. They just updated their free plan, and you get a lot without having to pay a single cent. 25,000 monthly active users, unlimited social connections, and you can go to production with custom domains. FOR FREE! ​ They are sponsoring this post. To save your time, keep your sanity, and have a really solid and secure solution, head over to their website: ​

Santiago

204,895 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Online you’ll hear, “Women’s sexuality is their only agency.” Here’s the truth: Men are the main consumers of female based content. And sex appeal is what men value. Attention is currency. That’s the marketplace. If you choose to be sexy online, understand the consequence of being online. Men will reward what they value. It’s not that a woman can’t be sexy and intelligent, It’s that intellect isn’t valued by the mainstream media. So don’t be shocked when your “mind” gets ignored… and your body is the only thing valuable to them. That’s supply and demand. But here’s the part no one tells woman. Just because something isn’t valued by the masses, doesn’t mean it’s not valued. Ignore the status quo’s Be sexy and intelligent. Own both, but you’re more than a body in a thumbnail. Post your ideas. Even if you 0 likes. Because long term respect is built on substance, in real life. Not online. This is why social media isn’t real life.
0:30

Online you’ll hear, “Women’s sexuality is their only agency.” Here’s the truth: Men are the main consumers of female based content. And sex appeal is what men value. Attention is currency. That’s the marketplace. If you choose to be sexy online, understand the consequence of being online. Men will reward what they value. It’s not that a woman can’t be sexy and intelligent, It’s that intellect isn’t valued by the mainstream media. So don’t be shocked when your “mind” gets ignored… and your body is the only thing valuable to them. That’s supply and demand. But here’s the part no one tells woman. Just because something isn’t valued by the masses, doesn’t mean it’s not valued. Ignore the status quo’s Be sexy and intelligent. Own both, but you’re more than a body in a thumbnail. Post your ideas. Even if you 0 likes. Because long term respect is built on substance, in real life. Not online. This is why social media isn’t real life.

Gia Macool

16,240 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

So many of you asking me what your first post should be ???? … how about we start the “ tongue 👅 challenge” .. everyone just go post this .. say your name and what you do and then let your tongue 😜 goooooo” everyone is overthinking shit 💩 .. listen to the second video on this post to understand and understand the 80/20 rule of content …too many fear a post not doing well, or the judgement in the comments .. we have to stop that ! #firstpost #inspiration #garyvee
0:03

So many of you asking me what your first post should be ???? … how about we start the “ tongue 👅 challenge” .. everyone just go post this .. say your name and what you do and then let your tongue 😜 goooooo” everyone is overthinking shit 💩 .. listen to the second video on this post to understand and understand the 80/20 rule of content …too many fear a post not doing well, or the judgement in the comments .. we have to stop that ! #firstpost #inspiration #garyvee

Gary Vaynerchuk

15,775 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce