Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Google just released PaliGemma 2 Mix: new versatile instruction vision language models 🔥 > Three new models: 3B, 10B, 28B with res 224, 448 💙 > Can do vision language tasks with open-ended prompts, understand documents, and segment or detect anything 🤯

83,712 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля merve
merve1 год назад

All models and the demo are here 🤝 Read our blog to learn more 📚

Фото профиля merve
merve1 год назад

@onuralpszr this might interest you!

Фото профиля Quantify Funds
Quantify Funds1 год назад

Watch this space for the reveal 👀 BIG NEWS: Our family of ETFs is expanding with 10 new single stock offerings. Read the pre-effective prospectus @ #STKd #QuantifyFunds #QuantifyChaos #Nasdaq #ETFs

Фото профиля ondevice
ondevice1 год назад

love how, usually when we come across something from google, we usually see demos rather than just academic benchmarks thanks team! love this @DynamicWebPaige @OfficialLoganK @AarushSelvan

Фото профиля lambda
lambda1 год назад

openAI should take notes. Even google is open sourcing

Фото профиля merve
merve1 год назад

google has been open sourcing since early times and for a long while actually

Фото профиля nonc3ai
nonc3ai1 год назад

Great news, 3B should be small enough to run on a phone, right?

Фото профиля merve
merve1 год назад

if you quantize, yes ☺️

Фото профиля Arpit Sharma
Arpit Sharma1 год назад

AI that sees, understands, and segments. Impressive!

Фото профиля Matthew Rogers
Matthew Rogers1 год назад

I want to scan my mail, lets go!

Фото профиля Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükara1 год назад

Why res is still to low?

Похожие видео

We benchmarked leading multimodal foundation models (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini, Llama, etc.) on standard computer vision tasks—from segmentation to surface normal estimation—using standard datasets like COCO and ImageNet. These models have made remarkable progress; however, it is unclear exactly where they stand in terms of understanding vision in detail. Especially when it comes to tasks beyond question-answering. How well do they understand an object's segments or geometry? Our analyses yield an assessment that is quantitatively and qualitatively detailed and is compatible with evaluations developed in the field of computer vision over the past decades. Observed trends: 🔹 The foundation models consistently underperform task-specific SOTA models across all tasks. However, they are respectable generalists, which is remarkable as they are presumably trained primarily on image-text-based tasks. 🔹 They perform semantic tasks notably better than geometric ones. 🔹 GPT-4o performs the best among non-reasoning models, getting the top position in 4 out of 6 tasks. 🔹 Reasoning models, e.g., o3, show improvements in geometric tasks. 🔹 The 'image generation' models, e.g., GPT-40 Image Generation, which have been natively trained multimodally, exhibit quirks. E.g., hallucinated objects, misalignment between the input and output, etc. 🔹 While the prompting techniques affect performance, better models exhibit less sensitivity to variations in prompts. We control for the variance introduced by the prompting methods in our experiments. 🌐 Detailed analyses, visualizations: ⌨️ code: 🧵 1/n

Amir Zamir

73,074 просмотров • 1 год назад