Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

GPT-5.6 is here. I wish we could use it.

theo's profile picture

Theo - t3.gg

353,031 subscribers

84,222 просмотров • 15 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

GPT 5.6 is out but you can't use it lol watch why
9:30

GPT 5.6 is out but you can't use it lol watch why

David Ondrej

17,449 просмотров • 15 дней назад

The New GPT 5.6 Sol is insane. ❤️‍🔥Just recorded a 21-min Full Tutorial on How To Build Premium, Cinematic Websites with GPT 5.6 Sol!
21:22

The New GPT 5.6 Sol is insane. ❤️‍🔥Just recorded a 21-min Full Tutorial on How To Build Premium, Cinematic Websites with GPT 5.6 Sol!

Viktor Oddy

562,675 просмотров • 2 дней назад

“I wish I could eat like the other children... people throw food away, and we just wish we could have it.” —A child from Gaza.
1:20

“I wish I could eat like the other children... people throw food away, and we just wish we could have it.” —A child from Gaza.

Suppressed News.

47,820 просмотров • 1 год назад

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua
0:42

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

228,126 просмотров • 23 дней назад

I could really use a wish right now...
0:26

I could really use a wish right now...

Click The Gender

607,717 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

THEY FIXED FRONTEND FOR GPT-5.6 FINALLY!!! THIS IS NOT EVEN SOL THIS IS LUNA
0:24

THEY FIXED FRONTEND FOR GPT-5.6 FINALLY!!! THIS IS NOT EVEN SOL THIS IS LUNA

Hamza

87,405 просмотров • 2 дней назад

gpt-5.4 is an incredible model. It is the only model I use for 90% of the stuff I do.
40:20

gpt-5.4 is an incredible model. It is the only model I use for 90% of the stuff I do.

Theo - t3.gg

151,682 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

GPT 5.6 Has Trauma from Training 💀
0:43

GPT 5.6 Has Trauma from Training 💀

Nerd Snipe

16,734 просмотров • 20 часов назад

"I just wish you were still here so I could tell you... We did it." We know Roxane would be proud of you, Yan ❤️ Hear Yan Diomande's story ➡️
0:30

"I just wish you were still here so I could tell you... We did it." We know Roxane would be proud of you, Yan ❤️ Hear Yan Diomande's story ➡️

RB Leipzig English

361,632 просмотров • 23 дней назад

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.
0:26

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,160 просмотров • 2 дней назад

i WISH we could just rewind…
0:28

i WISH we could just rewind…

ْ

163,305 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I wish we could liberate Germany.
0:41

I wish we could liberate Germany.

9mmSMG

119,101 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The feeling of finding out your having a Baby is electric! I wish we could bottle it up and keep it forever 💕
1:09

The feeling of finding out your having a Baby is electric! I wish we could bottle it up and keep it forever 💕

G-MA & G-PA

155,826 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I wish I could make it
0:25

I wish I could make it

Jerry 🐭

417,815 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

From rough ideas to quality work. OpenAl's GPT-5.6 is rolling out across Microsoft 365 Copilot in Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Chat, and Copilot Cowork. Optimized with OpenAl for knowledge work, GPT-5.6 is the preferred model for Microsoft 365 Copilot.
0:24

From rough ideas to quality work. OpenAl's GPT-5.6 is rolling out across Microsoft 365 Copilot in Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Chat, and Copilot Cowork. Optimized with OpenAl for knowledge work, GPT-5.6 is the preferred model for Microsoft 365 Copilot.

Microsoft 365

33,111 просмотров • 2 дней назад

📣 OpenAI Developers's GPT-5.6 family is now generally available and rolling out in GitHub Copilot. GPT-5.6 comes in three variants: ☀️ GPT-5.6 Sol: the highest reasoning ceiling in the family. Best for complex reasoning over large codebases and demanding, long-running agentic work. 🌎 GPT-5.6 Terra: the balanced default. A strong all-round choice for everyday interactive and agentic coding. 🌕 GPT-5.6 Luna: a lightweight, cost-efficient variant for smaller, faster tasks and the lowest-cost option in the family. Try one, two, or them all in Visual Studio Code or the GitHub Copilot app.
1:07

📣 OpenAI Developers's GPT-5.6 family is now generally available and rolling out in GitHub Copilot. GPT-5.6 comes in three variants: ☀️ GPT-5.6 Sol: the highest reasoning ceiling in the family. Best for complex reasoning over large codebases and demanding, long-running agentic work. 🌎 GPT-5.6 Terra: the balanced default. A strong all-round choice for everyday interactive and agentic coding. 🌕 GPT-5.6 Luna: a lightweight, cost-efficient variant for smaller, faster tasks and the lowest-cost option in the family. Try one, two, or them all in Visual Studio Code or the GitHub Copilot app.

GitHub

152,036 просмотров • 2 дней назад

GPT-5.6 is a viable alternative to Fable for most knowledge work. GPT-5.6's writing is consistently well-structured and easy to read. Fable's prose can be exhausting. 5.6 also makes fresh design choices with clean hierarchy. Fable can struggle to maintain visual relationships and leans on worn-out AI tropes like eyebrow text. Examples in thread 👇 - Orbital objects explainer - Site plan for fitness resort - World Cup goals data viz GPT-5.6 is now available on Hyperagent
0:21

GPT-5.6 is a viable alternative to Fable for most knowledge work. GPT-5.6's writing is consistently well-structured and easy to read. Fable's prose can be exhausting. 5.6 also makes fresh design choices with clean hierarchy. Fable can struggle to maintain visual relationships and leans on worn-out AI tropes like eyebrow text. Examples in thread 👇 - Orbital objects explainer - Site plan for fitness resort - World Cup goals data viz GPT-5.6 is now available on Hyperagent

Hyperagent

226,080 просмотров • 2 дней назад

GPT‑5.6 is helping Vercel’s internal data science agent tackle harder work Andrew Qu, Vercel’s Chief of Software, used GPT-5.6 and Codex to unblock an internal data science agent on work where earlier models got stuck.
1:04

GPT‑5.6 is helping Vercel’s internal data science agent tackle harder work Andrew Qu, Vercel’s Chief of Software, used GPT-5.6 and Codex to unblock an internal data science agent on work where earlier models got stuck.

OpenAI Developers

207,563 просмотров • 2 дней назад