Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

GPT-6 Astra vs. Fable 5.1 both made using same prompt & /goal (fable did sky theme and astra did astro theme) which one did it better?

jaimintf's profile picture

jaimin

1,798 subscribers

595,104 views • 23 hours ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyGaming
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Side-by-side evaluation: GPT-6 Astra vs. Fable 5.1. Both videos generated using Higgsfield Seedance 2.5.
0:18

Side-by-side evaluation: GPT-6 Astra vs. Fable 5.1. Both videos generated using Higgsfield Seedance 2.5.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

348,316 views • 1 day ago

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1, paper-craft kabuki round. Made with Higgsfield Seedance 2.5.
0:18

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1, paper-craft kabuki round. Made with Higgsfield Seedance 2.5.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

57,809 views • 1 day ago

GPT-6 Astra vs. Fable 5.1 in a hand-drawn Japanese ghost story. Both outputs rendered with Higgsfield Seedance 2.5.
0:18

GPT-6 Astra vs. Fable 5.1 in a hand-drawn Japanese ghost story. Both outputs rendered with Higgsfield Seedance 2.5.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

132,528 views • 1 day ago

Built a villa scene in Blender with Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra This is what it built
0:20

Built a villa scene in Blender with Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra This is what it built

Karan

2,638,126 views • 1 day ago

GPT-6 Astra made this ps5 controller in threejs, no model comes even close. This is a huge step up from 5.6 Sol, and even from Fable 5.1 id say. Crazy model.
0:11

GPT-6 Astra made this ps5 controller in threejs, no model comes even close. This is a huge step up from 5.6 Sol, and even from Fable 5.1 id say. Crazy model.

bluedev

86,154 views • 18 hours ago

Fable 5.1 vs GPT 5.6 Sol tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available > Fable took 10 minutes to complete this test and costed $1.6 > Sol took 7 minutes and costed around $.95 even tho sol is cheaper and faster but results are really different which one won here?
0:18

Fable 5.1 vs GPT 5.6 Sol tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available > Fable took 10 minutes to complete this test and costed $1.6 > Sol took 7 minutes and costed around $.95 even tho sol is cheaper and faster but results are really different which one won here?

J A Z I I

40,331 views • 3 days ago

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?
0:20

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Bhavy☄️

145,921 views • 3 days ago

I tested Qwen 3.8 vs Fable 5 Both were made with Renoise CLI. Which output do you like better? Prompt in thread 🧵
0:13

I tested Qwen 3.8 vs Fable 5 Both were made with Renoise CLI. Which output do you like better? Prompt in thread 🧵

Kiki

114,297 views • 1 month ago

HOLY SHIT Omen Alpha finished the full test in just 1h 30m, while GLM 5.3 Flash and GPT 5.6 Luna Max took around 3 hours. Bro, what even is this model?? Are we actually looking at something that could compete with GPT-6 Astra or Fable 5.1?
0:12

HOLY SHIT Omen Alpha finished the full test in just 1h 30m, while GLM 5.3 Flash and GPT 5.6 Luna Max took around 3 hours. Bro, what even is this model?? Are we actually looking at something that could compete with GPT-6 Astra or Fable 5.1?

Iam_

37,312 views • 1 day ago

Fable is amazing!! I gave it a prompt to "build a minecraft style roller coaster for the stock market" And it just did it. ONE SHOT! 😲🎢:
0:10

Fable is amazing!! I gave it a prompt to "build a minecraft style roller coaster for the stock market" And it just did it. ONE SHOT! 😲🎢:

jinjingliang

175,542 views • 2 months ago

AI agents can do animation for you now. All I did was create the character in GPT Image 2.0. Fable 5 handled the story and prompt, then I used Renoise CLI to run it with Seedance 2.0. Prompt in thread ⤵️
0:12

AI agents can do animation for you now. All I did was create the character in GPT Image 2.0. Fable 5 handled the story and prompt, then I used Renoise CLI to run it with Seedance 2.0. Prompt in thread ⤵️

Kiki

90,430 views • 1 month ago

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?
0:14

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?

Bhavy☄️

110,316 views • 20 days ago

Fable 5 totally crushed our new contest, but it cost 6x more than Opus 4.8! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: — A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water — Two cars jumping off ramps and colliding mid-air over a canyon — A monster truck crushing a row of parked cars Outputs: Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08 Fable 5 did all three scenes at A+. The crashes looked real, things fell and broke the right way, and nothing went through the ground or floated. GPT 5.5 was the closest to Fable. In the Bigfoot show, we think GPT was even a little better. GLM 5.2 did not win any scene, but it was the cheapest by far. Fable is the best pick for quality, but you pay more for it.
0:16

Fable 5 totally crushed our new contest, but it cost 6x more than Opus 4.8! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: — A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water — Two cars jumping off ramps and colliding mid-air over a canyon — A monster truck crushing a row of parked cars Outputs: Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08 Fable 5 did all three scenes at A+. The crashes looked real, things fell and broke the right way, and nothing went through the ground or floated. GPT 5.5 was the closest to Fable. In the Bigfoot show, we think GPT was even a little better. GLM 5.2 did not win any scene, but it was the cheapest by far. Fable is the best pick for quality, but you pay more for it.

atomic.chat

2,839,437 views • 2 months ago

i gave the same prompt to kimi k2.5 and this is what it built who did it better?
0:17

i gave the same prompt to kimi k2.5 and this is what it built who did it better?

Okara

17,611 views • 7 months ago

GPT 6 Astra is INSANE. It built the backrooms in blender and then added VHS effects etc. Took 30 minutes to make it and another 20 to export. This isn't AI generated video it's all in blender. It did the sound effects too. aprox 5 prompts.
0:20

GPT 6 Astra is INSANE. It built the backrooms in blender and then added VHS effects etc. Took 30 minutes to make it and another 20 to export. This isn't AI generated video it's all in blender. It did the sound effects too. aprox 5 prompts.

Duncan Trussell

530,339 views • 15 hours ago

🚨 Nickatnite pays homage to Playboi Carti in new snippet by using baby voice which one did it better? 🤔
0:16

🚨 Nickatnite pays homage to Playboi Carti in new snippet by using baby voice which one did it better? 🤔

nat

47,982 views • 5 months ago

just sent my first prompt to Fable 5 > it instantly routed the task to Opus 4.8 > which spawned Sonnet 5 sub agents > that burned 30% of my weekly limit > and handed me slop this thing used to build full open words and refactor entire codebases in one shot WHAT DID YOU DO ANTHROPIC
0:16

just sent my first prompt to Fable 5 > it instantly routed the task to Opus 4.8 > which spawned Sonnet 5 sub agents > that burned 30% of my weekly limit > and handed me slop this thing used to build full open words and refactor entire codebases in one shot WHAT DID YOU DO ANTHROPIC

Machina

545,175 views • 2 months ago

MiniMax H3 vs Seedance 2.0 Created entirely on Pollo AI using the same prompt and settings to compare both models fairly. From commercial visuals to camera movement, each model brings a different style. Watch the comparison and decide which one performs better for your workflow. Which one would you choose—MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0?
0:14

MiniMax H3 vs Seedance 2.0 Created entirely on Pollo AI using the same prompt and settings to compare both models fairly. From commercial visuals to camera movement, each model brings a different style. Watch the comparison and decide which one performs better for your workflow. Which one would you choose—MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0?

Sophia

41,157 views • 1 month ago

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?
0:17

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

47,629 views • 1 month ago

Astra (GPT-6) is here!!! I've had early access and tested it like crazy with things like games, code, writing, browser control, presentations and general knowledge work. This is the best model I've ever used. Period. (Incredible demos below in this thread ⬇️) Here's my take on Astra: > It's insanely capable. This feels like a massive improvement, not just an incremental change. This is especially true with zero-shot prompts. > It's all about knowledge work. Slide creation, analysis, writing, and browser control. And oh my...it's so good at browser control. GPT-5.6 was already fantastic at doing things in the browser, Astra is another level and significantly faster. > We're closer than ever (arrived?) at prompt-to-playable game. And I don't just mean only playable, these are actually fun games. I bet if someone with a great eye for games used Astra, they could create a viral game within 1-2 weeks. > Astra is better at writing but not perfect. It removes much of the "AI Smell" we're all familiar with but some stink still survived. > It has a tendency to use the same design colors and look/feel as GPT-5.6 (forrest green anyone?) but it is more steerable in design than previous models. > It's highly steerable in general. A little nudge goes a long way. When I first started using Astra, almost every task I gave it would go for ~30 minutes. I wanted it to keep working. Adding more specifics to a prompt helped greatly with it's ability to work for a long time. > Astra's 3D understanding is unmatched. 3D asset creation was consistent and easy and its spacial awareness while building complex 3D worlds blew me away. I'm still getting familiar with Astra but this will now be my go-to model for any difficult work I have. Check out the demos below: 👇
0:14

Astra (GPT-6) is here!!! I've had early access and tested it like crazy with things like games, code, writing, browser control, presentations and general knowledge work. This is the best model I've ever used. Period. (Incredible demos below in this thread ⬇️) Here's my take on Astra: > It's insanely capable. This feels like a massive improvement, not just an incremental change. This is especially true with zero-shot prompts. > It's all about knowledge work. Slide creation, analysis, writing, and browser control. And oh my...it's so good at browser control. GPT-5.6 was already fantastic at doing things in the browser, Astra is another level and significantly faster. > We're closer than ever (arrived?) at prompt-to-playable game. And I don't just mean only playable, these are actually fun games. I bet if someone with a great eye for games used Astra, they could create a viral game within 1-2 weeks. > Astra is better at writing but not perfect. It removes much of the "AI Smell" we're all familiar with but some stink still survived. > It has a tendency to use the same design colors and look/feel as GPT-5.6 (forrest green anyone?) but it is more steerable in design than previous models. > It's highly steerable in general. A little nudge goes a long way. When I first started using Astra, almost every task I gave it would go for ~30 minutes. I wanted it to keep working. Adding more specifics to a prompt helped greatly with it's ability to work for a long time. > Astra's 3D understanding is unmatched. 3D asset creation was consistent and easy and its spacial awareness while building complex 3D worlds blew me away. I'm still getting familiar with Astra but this will now be my go-to model for any difficult work I have. Check out the demos below: 👇

Matthew Berman

1,689,765 views • 1 day ago