正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

I tested Qwen 3.8 vs Fable 5 Both were made with Renoise CLI. Which output do you like better? Prompt in thread 🧵

Kiki

7,242 subscribers

114,297 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

AI agents can do animation for you now. All I did was create the character in GPT Image 2.0. Fable 5 handled the story and prompt, then I used Renoise CLI to run it with Seedance 2.0. Prompt in thread ⤵️

AI agents can do animation for you now. All I did was create the character in GPT Image 2.0. Fable 5 handled the story and prompt, then I used Renoise CLI to run it with Seedance 2.0. Prompt in thread ⤵️

Kiki

90,651 次观看 • 1 个月前

Qwen 3.8 vs Fable 5 Created with Arcads

Qwen 3.8 vs Fable 5 Created with Arcads

arcads AI

46,066 次观看 • 1 个月前

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 for a McDonald’s ad 🍟 Made with Renoise CLI.

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 for a McDonald’s ad 🍟 Made with Renoise CLI.

Renoise

16,664 次观看 • 6 天前

I tested again Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a family having lunch in 3D. Qwen 3.8 wins again for me on quality. but Gemini finished in under 2 mins, the others took 6+. Which one wins for you?

I tested again Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a family having lunch in 3D. Qwen 3.8 wins again for me on quality. but Gemini finished in under 2 mins, the others took 6+. Which one wins for you?

Bhavy☄️

71,444 次观看 • 28 天前

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a busy train interior, then leaving the station. Qwen 3.8 and GLM 5.3 look best to me. but Gemini did it in 1 min 45 secs lol, others took more than 7 mins. Which one wins for you?

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a busy train interior, then leaving the station. Qwen 3.8 and GLM 5.3 look best to me. but Gemini did it in 1 min 45 secs lol, others took more than 7 mins. Which one wins for you?

Bhavy☄️

24,968 次观看 • 28 天前

GPT-6 Astra vs. Fable 5.1 both made using same prompt & /goal (fable did sky theme and astra did astro theme) which one did it better?

GPT-6 Astra vs. Fable 5.1 both made using same prompt & /goal (fable did sky theme and astra did astro theme) which one did it better?

jaimin

919,679 次观看 • 9 天前

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

47,643 次观看 • 1 个月前

Kimi K3 VS Claude Fable 5. Prompt in the 🧵, now try it on Flowith.

Kimi K3 VS Claude Fable 5. Prompt in the 🧵, now try it on Flowith.

Flowith

73,092 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is literally my new workflow now: Character Design → GPT Image 2.0 Story & Prompt → Fable 5 Animation → Seedance 2.0 Prompt in thread 🧵

This is literally my new workflow now: Character Design → GPT Image 2.0 Story & Prompt → Fable 5 Animation → Seedance 2.0 Prompt in thread 🧵

Kiki

26,541 次观看 • 1 个月前

Another comparison round. Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0, both animated with Seedance 2.0. Prompt in the thread 🧵

Another comparison round. Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0, both animated with Seedance 2.0. Prompt in the thread 🧵

Higgsfield AI 🧩

24,807 次观看 • 2 个月前

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0. Both animated in Seedance 2.0. Prompt in the thread 🧵

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0. Both animated in Seedance 2.0. Prompt in the thread 🧵

Higgsfield AI 🧩

34,486 次观看 • 2 个月前

Qwen 3.8 27b nvfp4 vs Grok 4.6 Someone tell me how this local model that is 100x smaller and 10x slower made a better animation?! Elon Musk help us solve this, both with their highest thinking mode (xhigh vs max)

Qwen 3.8 27b nvfp4 vs Grok 4.6 Someone tell me how this local model that is 100x smaller and 10x slower made a better animation?! Elon Musk help us solve this, both with their highest thinking mode (xhigh vs max)

Wësche

166,698 次观看 • 29 天前

GPT 5.6 Pro Mogs Fable 5 in this prompt 😳 Prompt : make bmpt-72 turret in three js - low poly with recognizable silhuette in one html code block . quoted image is output from fable 5 created by Mirochill

GPT 5.6 Pro Mogs Fable 5 in this prompt 😳 Prompt : make bmpt-72 turret in three js - low poly with recognizable silhuette in one html code block . quoted image is output from fable 5 created by Mirochill

Chetaslua

65,269 次观看 • 2 个月前

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Bhavy☄️

147,501 次观看 • 12 天前

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0. Both were animated with Seedance 2.0. Check replies to find the prompt 🧵

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0. Both were animated with Seedance 2.0. Check replies to find the prompt 🧵

Higgsfield AI 🧩

38,832 次观看 • 2 个月前

Fable 5.1 vs GPT 5.6 Sol tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available > Fable took 10 minutes to complete this test and costed $1.6 > Sol took 7 minutes and costed around $.95 even tho sol is cheaper and faster but results are really different which one won here?

Fable 5.1 vs GPT 5.6 Sol tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available > Fable took 10 minutes to complete this test and costed $1.6 > Sol took 7 minutes and costed around $.95 even tho sol is cheaper and faster but results are really different which one won here?

J A Z I I

41,089 次观看 • 12 天前

GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 in action-figure animation, both generated with Seedance 2.0.

GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 in action-figure animation, both generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

46,599 次观看 • 2 个月前

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next (125B A6B MoE) Vs Qwen 3.8 27B (dense) - Both Q4_K_XL - Reasoning Off Prompt: Create a very high quality realistic video like animation of the solar system. three.js via cdn. Let the camera revolve around. single html file. dont call any tools. dont need any controls. Qwen 3.8 27b focused on computational physics & geometry (inclinations, coordinate math, moon orbits). While Qwen 3.8 125B A6B focused on cinematography & visual UX (lighting contrast, atmospheric glow, framing, and HUD overlays). It also followed the camera instruction correctly and produced result thats visually more stunning. Both the models run on single RTX 3090/4090 (24 GB VRAM). the 27b will fit entirely in the VRAM, but you'd need 100-120GB RAM for the new 125B MoE (check out the previous post for complete inference benchmarks and llama.cpp setup) Qwen 3.8 Flash Next beats Qwen 3.8 27B in almost all the benchmarks. have dropped the intelligence benchmark comparison and unsloth quant huggingface links in the replies. Which one would u be running regularly on your hardware?

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next (125B A6B MoE) Vs Qwen 3.8 27B (dense) - Both Q4_K_XL - Reasoning Off Prompt: Create a very high quality realistic video like animation of the solar system. three.js via cdn. Let the camera revolve around. single html file. dont call any tools. dont need any controls. Qwen 3.8 27b focused on computational physics & geometry (inclinations, coordinate math, moon orbits). While Qwen 3.8 125B A6B focused on cinematography & visual UX (lighting contrast, atmospheric glow, framing, and HUD overlays). It also followed the camera instruction correctly and produced result thats visually more stunning. Both the models run on single RTX 3090/4090 (24 GB VRAM). the 27b will fit entirely in the VRAM, but you'd need 100-120GB RAM for the new 125B MoE (check out the previous post for complete inference benchmarks and llama.cpp setup) Qwen 3.8 Flash Next beats Qwen 3.8 27B in almost all the benchmarks. have dropped the intelligence benchmark comparison and unsloth quant huggingface links in the replies. Which one would u be running regularly on your hardware?

Alok

33,836 次观看 • 18 天前

Yup! Gemini 3.8 Flash made this in Antigravity.. It's exceptionally good in frontend tasks.. i was amazed to see this level of polished output.. It did take a few iterations to tweak specific animations and morphing but this result is unreal! Which one do you like more?

Yup! Gemini 3.8 Flash made this in Antigravity.. It's exceptionally good in frontend tasks.. i was amazed to see this level of polished output.. It did take a few iterations to tweak specific animations and morphing but this result is unreal! Which one do you like more?

Bee

30,997 次观看 • 8 天前

🚨 Qwen new checkpoint - kieran As usual it claims he is claude and made by anthropic but with tokenizer prompt , its clear - QWEN model Ignore website this is my test to know which model is which behind the scene , should i test it and compare with kimi k3 / opus 5 /sol 5.6

🚨 Qwen new checkpoint - kieran As usual it claims he is claude and made by anthropic but with tokenizer prompt , its clear - QWEN model Ignore website this is my test to know which model is which behind the scene , should i test it and compare with kimi k3 / opus 5 /sol 5.6

Chetaslua

15,544 次观看 • 1 个月前