正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Graham Hancock reveals that over 300 ancient myths assert a “global cataclysm” destroyed a “golden age” of civilization thousands of years ago. The evidence for Atlantis goes much deeper than you think. And the evidence of a global flood around 11,600 years ago is only getting stronger. Randall Carlson:...

69,109 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This may be the strongest evidence for the location of Atlantis yet. Independent geologist Randall Carlson just visited the Azores. And he revealed to Graham Hancock why he’s convinced this was most likely the heart of ancient Atlantean civilization: “There’s definitely evidence that’s consistent with catastrophic episodes in the recent geological past.” “After a detailed reading of multiple translations of Plato’s two relevant dialogues, Timaeus and Critias, and having some knowledge of the marine geology … it looks to me like of all the possible candidates that have been proposed for the locus of the Atlantean civilization, the one that seems to fit Plato’s very precise details … the most, in my mind, is the Azores.” “It has a lot of the earmarks of having undergone catastrophic subsidence in the very recent geological past.” “Plato’s description of geography is very consistent, beyond the west of the Pillars of Heracles, you encounter islands, and then beyond those is the island complex of Atlantis.” “And then beyond that, as he describes it, is the true continent—” Hancock: “Which we have to read as the Americas.” Carlson: “The nine islands of the Azores have their roots in the microcontinent, as it’s called, and they’re essentially mountains … whose peaks are above sea level.” “We had a professional geologist traveling with us, and he admitted, yes, there is evidence here that would be more consistent with a continental bedrock than oceanic bedrock.” Graham Hancock Randall Carlson

Holden Culotta

51,789 次观看 • 7 个月前

You have heard of Atlantis, the island civilization that vanished beneath the sea. What you may not know is that Plato gave a precise date for when it sank, and that modern science has found a real event that happened at almost exactly that moment. First, it is worth remembering what Plato actually wrote. We tend to treat Atlantis as a myth he invented. But in his dialogues Timaeus and Critias, written around 360 BC, Plato does not present it as a fable or an allegory at all... The story, he says, had been carried to Athens by the great lawgiver Solon, who had traveled to Egypt and heard it from the priests of the city of Sais, keepers of records far older than Greece. One old priest tells Solon: "O Solon, Solon, you Hellenes are never anything but children, and there is not an old man among you." The Greeks, he says, have forgotten their own past, while the Egyptians had written it down. And the priest gives a specific timeframe. The war between the Proto-Athenians and Atlantis, he says, took place 9,000 years before Solon's visit. Then, in Plato's words: "there occurred violent earthquakes and floods; and in a single day and night of misfortune... the island of Atlantis disappeared in the depths of the sea." Nine thousand years before Solon places the event at roughly 11,600 years ago. And here is where it becomes strange... That date, 11,600 years ago, is almost exactly when one of the most dramatic climate transitions in the recent history of the planet came to an end. Geologists call it the Younger Dryas: a period when the Earth, already warming out of the last Ice Age, suddenly plunged back into near-glacial cold for more than a thousand years. According to modern science, that cold period ended around 11,600 years ago, and it ended abruptly. The warming returned with great speed, and the great ice sheets resumed melting. That melting is the part that matters here. Some scientists have identified a phase of rapid sea-level rise at the close of the Younger Dryas, beginning around 11,500 years ago, known as Meltwater Pulse 1B. The studies that support it describe sea levels surging upward as the ice sheets collapsed, drowning coastlines that had stood for thousands of years. Plato's date for the sinking of Atlantis, in other words, falls almost exactly on the moment when modern science says the oceans may have risen suddenly and swallowed land at the end of the Ice Age. I want to be careful and honest here: none of this proves that Atlantis was real. Most scholars believe Plato invented the story to illustrate his ideas about pride and the fall of great civilizations, and they may well be right. But the coincidence is hard to shake. A philosopher in the fourth century BC, insisting he was recording true history passed down from a people who kept ancient records, said that a great land was destroyed by floods roughly 11,600 years ago. And thousands of years later, with ice cores and radiocarbon dating, we discovered that the last Ice Age really did end at almost exactly that moment, in melting ice and rising seas. Plato could not have known any of this. He had no way to date the end of the Ice Age, no way to know that the oceans had once risen and erased the old coastlines of the world. And yet the moment he chose, for the drowning of his lost civilization, is the same moment the seas truly rose. Perhaps it's just a coincidence. Or perhaps the Egyptians, as the priest told Solon, simply remembered something the rest of us forgot. Maybe we really are a species with amnesia... I started this newsletter because our past is extraordinary, and fewer and fewer people are showing us how to truly see it. Every week I try to. If that is something you would like to be part of, you can join at the link below, and if you'd like to support my work, a paid subscription is what makes it possible: Thanks for reading.

James Lucas

39,911 次观看 • 2 个月前

A map from 1531 reveals something that could rewrite all of human history. “The map maker tells us he uncovered material previously hidden in darkness … ” If you’ve never heard of the Orontius Finaeus map, this will blow your mind: Graham Hancock: “The Orontius Finaeus map shows Antarctica.” “This map was drawn in 1531.” “The problem is that our civilization didn’t discover Antarctica until 1820.” This map is a key piece of evidence that Hancock raises to support his theory of a lost, ancient civilization. “When I say a lost civilization, I do not mean a civilization like ours.” “I think they were very different civilization from ours.” “But they had conquered a number of peaks.” “One of those peaks was navigation and ocean seafaring.” “Hence the survival of maps, which show the world as it looked during the Ice Age.” “Another was astronomy.” “Another really important breakthrough evidenced by the ancient maps … is accurate relative longitudes.” “Particularly when we know that the map was based on older source maps.” “Had somebody found Antarctica long before we did and mapped it with extremely accurate relative longitudes?” “Our civilization didn’t crack the longitude problem until the mid-18th century.” “We didn’t get that until 1750, 1760s, there abouts, with Harrison’s chronometer.” “So finding good longitudes on very ancient maps is another puzzle that I don’t think archeology solved.” Graham Hancock Steven Bartlett

Holden Culotta

68,698 次观看 • 2 个月前

Randall Carlson reconstructs the hydrology of the North American meltdown in terms that make the scale of the event viscerally clear. Throughout the Ice Age, seasonal melting was already producing water volumes far exceeding anything in the modern Mississippi system. When the great meltdown began in earnest, that volume multiplied dramatically. The Mississippi was not acting alone. The Minnesota River, the Ohio River, and the Missouri River were all simultaneously carrying massively augmented meltwater flows - glacial outbursts and seasonal discharge on a scale that has no modern equivalent - and feeding all of it into the Mississippi. The river was moving an enormous sediment load southward under that volume of water, and when it reached the Gulf of Mexico it encountered a standing body of water. The energy that had been carrying sediment in suspension suddenly dissipated, and the sediment dropped. The delta began to build. What the diverse environmental indicators preserved in that sediment record show is the speed of what followed. Earth's climate did not gradually drift toward modern conditions over tens of thousands of years. Randall cites evidence suggesting the transition from Ice Age conditions to something approximating the modern climate occurred in less than a millennium - a geological instant that compressed an enormous climatic shift into a timeframe that human populations alive at the time would have experienced within a handful of generations. Join Randall for his upcoming Finger Lakes Tour, Aug 30 - Sep 5, 2026:

Randall Carlson

24,519 次观看 • 4 个月前