Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

He points to a three-year field study testing whether a static neodymium magnetic disk placed beneath beehives could improve colony resilience and overwinter survival. The results were consistent across multiple seasons, not a single anomaly or one-off observation. The researchers deliberately avoided drawing conclusions from isolated data. They wanted... show more

Randall Carlson

169,524 subscribers

31,442 views • 24 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

CEO of Citadel Ken Griffin says that Data Center spend this year alone is set to be half a trillion dollars, $500 billion He says that AI is useful in some areas but it’s not worth the investment, he says a lot of what it produces “It’s all garbage” “Data center spent in the United States this year, over half a trillion dollars, like over $500 billion. You're not gonna generate this kind of spend unless you're gonna make a promise. You're gonna profoundly change the world. So is it hype? Of course — In certain areas, we know it's gonna be profound, whether it's call centers, whether it's helping to improve the productivity of software engineers, but in a number of white collar jobs, you know, there was a, there was a recent Harvard paper on this, they called it AI work Slop, that it looks good, but if you sort of peel back the onion, the substance isn't there. I was with one of my colleagues who runs our commodities business and they, he handed a report on that we were generated with an AI engine. Doesn't matter what the topic was, the first few sentences, like, wow, that's, that's really insightful. And then you go down below that and it's all garbage.”

CEO of Citadel Ken Griffin says that Data Center spend this year alone is set to be half a trillion dollars, $500 billion He says that AI is useful in some areas but it’s not worth the investment, he says a lot of what it produces “It’s all garbage” “Data center spent in the United States this year, over half a trillion dollars, like over $500 billion. You're not gonna generate this kind of spend unless you're gonna make a promise. You're gonna profoundly change the world. So is it hype? Of course — In certain areas, we know it's gonna be profound, whether it's call centers, whether it's helping to improve the productivity of software engineers, but in a number of white collar jobs, you know, there was a, there was a recent Harvard paper on this, they called it AI work Slop, that it looks good, but if you sort of peel back the onion, the substance isn't there. I was with one of my colleagues who runs our commodities business and they, he handed a report on that we were generated with an AI engine. Doesn't matter what the topic was, the first few sentences, like, wow, that's, that's really insightful. And then you go down below that and it's all garbage.”

Wall Street Apes

397,458 views • 3 months ago

🚨 My, how times have changed! Back in 2009, Sharyl Attkisson reported for CBS on an NIH-funded flu vaccine study that stunned even its authors. NIH scientists set out to prove the flu shot saves lives. At the time, no study had been able to demonstrate that flu vaccination lowers mortality. The researchers were certain the benefit was there, and they set out to prove it. They ran the data. They adjusted it. They modeled it every way they could. But they could not show that flu vaccination reduced deaths. When Attkisson tried to interview the study authors directly? The NIH blocked her access to them. Not a shocker. That CBS let her run with the piece is what’s surprising today. Sadly, it's the lack of this kind of honest reporting that leaves most Americans still believing that flu vaccines reduce death. They apparently do not. Sharyl explains...

🚨 My, how times have changed! Back in 2009, Sharyl Attkisson reported for CBS on an NIH-funded flu vaccine study that stunned even its authors. NIH scientists set out to prove the flu shot saves lives. At the time, no study had been able to demonstrate that flu vaccination lowers mortality. The researchers were certain the benefit was there, and they set out to prove it. They ran the data. They adjusted it. They modeled it every way they could. But they could not show that flu vaccination reduced deaths. When Attkisson tried to interview the study authors directly? The NIH blocked her access to them. Not a shocker. That CBS let her run with the piece is what’s surprising today. Sadly, it's the lack of this kind of honest reporting that leaves most Americans still believing that flu vaccines reduce death. They apparently do not. Sharyl explains...

Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

32,761 views • 4 months ago

Kevin O’Leary reveals Jeff Bezos doesn’t make decisions after 1 PM "Bezos will not make a decision after one in the afternoon because he felt that the noise was too high. The signal for him was in the morning hours" "This is a crucial aspect of success that I now understand defines an entrepreneur. A man or woman that understands a signal noise ratio and focuses on that, they'll be successful" "The ones that can’t get down to a 50/50 signal noise, they'll fail. It's a very simple concept. You have to decide how much signal you need to get those three to five things done"

Kevin O’Leary reveals Jeff Bezos doesn’t make decisions after 1 PM "Bezos will not make a decision after one in the afternoon because he felt that the noise was too high. The signal for him was in the morning hours" "This is a crucial aspect of success that I now understand defines an entrepreneur. A man or woman that understands a signal noise ratio and focuses on that, they'll be successful" "The ones that can’t get down to a 50/50 signal noise, they'll fail. It's a very simple concept. You have to decide how much signal you need to get those three to five things done"

dank

567,511 views • 2 months ago

Before a single stone was placed, they watched. Finding a location with a clear, unobstructed view of the horizon was the first step. Then came years of observation - tracking where the sun rose and set throughout the year, identifying the repeating pattern, and establishing the solar calendar encoded into so many of these structures. The moon required more patience. Its rising and setting position shifts continuously across an 18.6 year cycle before returning to its starting point. Understanding that cycle demanded generations of careful, recorded observation. And yet that precise 18.6 year lunar cycle is encoded into the design of ancient structures on multiple continents, built by cultures with no known contact with one another. The common system of sacred geometry, the common petrology, and now this common astronomical orientation - the convergence is too consistent to be coincidental. Randall puts it plainly. Why were they so obsessed with tracking? That question may be the most important one in the entire field of ancient history.

Before a single stone was placed, they watched. Finding a location with a clear, unobstructed view of the horizon was the first step. Then came years of observation - tracking where the sun rose and set throughout the year, identifying the repeating pattern, and establishing the solar calendar encoded into so many of these structures. The moon required more patience. Its rising and setting position shifts continuously across an 18.6 year cycle before returning to its starting point. Understanding that cycle demanded generations of careful, recorded observation. And yet that precise 18.6 year lunar cycle is encoded into the design of ancient structures on multiple continents, built by cultures with no known contact with one another. The common system of sacred geometry, the common petrology, and now this common astronomical orientation - the convergence is too consistent to be coincidental. Randall puts it plainly. Why were they so obsessed with tracking? That question may be the most important one in the entire field of ancient history.

Randall Carlson

17,162 views • 4 months ago

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.

Randall Carlson

11,737 views • 4 months ago

LeBron James will be wearing a “Year 23” patch on his jersey for the rest of the season. Very on brand for the King of the narcissists. Jay Skapinac thinks this is one of the first signals that LeBron is on the way to retirement and will not be on the Lakers next year, whether he likes it or not.

Jason Whitlock

134,675 views • 6 months ago

[WATCH] MY AVAILABILITY FOR LEADERSHIP. The issue of myself contesting or not contesting will be discussed in 2027. The matter of standing for a leadership position is closed till next year. If I was to comment on whether I’m standing or not standing I would be fuelling a debate that the organisation has reserved for next year. In 2027 after we’ve won the local government elections I will have an answer. When delegates sing that the SG has content it is an acknowledgement of that has been done and doesn’t go to my head. It is an appreciation of their Secretary General.

[WATCH] MY AVAILABILITY FOR LEADERSHIP. The issue of myself contesting or not contesting will be discussed in 2027. The matter of standing for a leadership position is closed till next year. If I was to comment on whether I’m standing or not standing I would be fuelling a debate that the organisation has reserved for next year. In 2027 after we’ve won the local government elections I will have an answer. When delegates sing that the SG has content it is an acknowledgement of that has been done and doesn’t go to my head. It is an appreciation of their Secretary General.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

37,924 views • 6 months ago

.Jason Rantz on Seattle Red calmly points out what was missing from the coverage of DNI Tulsi Gabbard's Senate testimony and masterfully explains the Trump administration's rationale for after Iran... "We're in a world of fact. I think Andrew McCabe's characterization of her answer goes very far from what she actually said. The question of whether or not something is imminent to the point where you're going to order military strikes is separate, and is the decision -- the sole decision maker there is the President. It's based on the intelligence that they're getting. And Tulsi Gabbard's point was we present the probabilities of what is a potential threat, and the President gets to decide with counsel whether or not he believes that it qualifies as imminent. To the point of what imminent means, it's not the same as what we all use this term. It started with the Bush doctrine. It expanded greatly under Obama, and they're basically arguing three main points, I think, for what imminent threat actually can be in this role: whether or not you have a window of opportunity -- and they had, obviously, a window of opportunity in this case, most of the people in Iran are no longer alive, the ability to go after someone who is in fact, or an organization or regime is a potential threat. Do they have the capabilities to threaten us? And the argument from the beginning wasn't solely about tomorrow, they can have nuclear capabilities. It was whether or not they were going to have the ballistic missile coverage to ensure that they can, in fact, cover their nuclear capability."

.Jason Rantz on Seattle Red calmly points out what was missing from the coverage of DNI Tulsi Gabbard's Senate testimony and masterfully explains the Trump administration's rationale for after Iran... "We're in a world of fact. I think Andrew McCabe's characterization of her answer goes very far from what she actually said. The question of whether or not something is imminent to the point where you're going to order military strikes is separate, and is the decision -- the sole decision maker there is the President. It's based on the intelligence that they're getting. And Tulsi Gabbard's point was we present the probabilities of what is a potential threat, and the President gets to decide with counsel whether or not he believes that it qualifies as imminent. To the point of what imminent means, it's not the same as what we all use this term. It started with the Bush doctrine. It expanded greatly under Obama, and they're basically arguing three main points, I think, for what imminent threat actually can be in this role: whether or not you have a window of opportunity -- and they had, obviously, a window of opportunity in this case, most of the people in Iran are no longer alive, the ability to go after someone who is in fact, or an organization or regime is a potential threat. Do they have the capabilities to threaten us? And the argument from the beginning wasn't solely about tomorrow, they can have nuclear capabilities. It was whether or not they were going to have the ballistic missile coverage to ensure that they can, in fact, cover their nuclear capability."

Curtis Houck

16,657 views • 4 months ago

"Do you feel the pull from an entrepreneur?" David Haber on what great founders feel like to investors: "It's sort of like a physical feeling almost, like a feeling of momentum. You sort of find yourself wanting to do more work and kind of leaning into the opportunity. Sort of like running down a hill almost." "Is this person or team kind of uniquely qualified to go tackle this opportunity?" "Do they have some sort of earned secret from prior work experience or in their life or personal life?" "I think the thing that I probably key most off of is clarity of thought." "Do they understand what they're gonna go build and why? And can they clearly articulate kind of a strategy." "Whether that strategy stays consistent or not, I think is kind of not the point. It's just how crisply do they articulate their point of view." David Haber on The High Flyers Podcast with Vidit Agarwal

"Do you feel the pull from an entrepreneur?" David Haber on what great founders feel like to investors: "It's sort of like a physical feeling almost, like a feeling of momentum. You sort of find yourself wanting to do more work and kind of leaning into the opportunity. Sort of like running down a hill almost." "Is this person or team kind of uniquely qualified to go tackle this opportunity?" "Do they have some sort of earned secret from prior work experience or in their life or personal life?" "I think the thing that I probably key most off of is clarity of thought." "Do they understand what they're gonna go build and why? And can they clearly articulate kind of a strategy." "Whether that strategy stays consistent or not, I think is kind of not the point. It's just how crisply do they articulate their point of view." David Haber on The High Flyers Podcast with Vidit Agarwal

a16z

27,489 views • 4 months ago

Supplementing with omega-3 fatty acids slows biological aging. Combining omega-3s with vitamin D and exercise has an additive effect, translating to ~3 months of slowed biological aging. These were the results of the 3-year-long DO-HEALTH study, which Prof Steve Horvath believes is one of the strongest pieces of evidence that simple interventions (that also likely correct a deficiency) are powerful ways to slow or reverse the aging process. We discuss this study and more in the latest episode of the FoundMyFitness podcast.

Supplementing with omega-3 fatty acids slows biological aging. Combining omega-3s with vitamin D and exercise has an additive effect, translating to ~3 months of slowed biological aging. These were the results of the 3-year-long DO-HEALTH study, which Prof Steve Horvath believes is one of the strongest pieces of evidence that simple interventions (that also likely correct a deficiency) are powerful ways to slow or reverse the aging process. We discuss this study and more in the latest episode of the FoundMyFitness podcast.

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

486,338 views • 1 month ago

Dave Ramsey explains how manhood and masculinity became "toxic" and why it led to 7.2 million men sitting at home doing NOTHING every day…👀 “Men have been devalued and trivialized and been the villain or the clown of everything for a good 20 years. You don't see a TV commercial where the dad is the hero... he's an idiot. Or a sitcom where the dad is the hero... he's an idiot. The 12-year-old is the smart one, and they smart off through the whole script. And the dad's a doofus and the mother rolls her eyes at the doofus that she picked as a life partner. If you do that to any segment of the economy long enough, eventually they begin to believe it. And so we have 7.2 million men that are able-bodied, able-minded, that are not engaged in the workplace right now. They're doing nothing. They're sitting because the entire culture has said, 'You're a doofus, you're a buffoon, you're valueless. Manhood, masculinity is toxic by its very nature, and so you're of no value.' And the problem is it's destroying not only economics, but social fabric as well because we do know the data on kids, particularly daughters. The cues they take from their dad are devastatingly impactful, good or bad. And so an engaged dad who builds confidence and, gives their daughter hugs growing up, until she leaves home and even after she leaves home, builds a confident daughter. A daughter that is not sexually promiscuous. A daughter that finishes college. A daughter that will not be victimized in the marketplace. That comes from their dads. The data shows that. And so when the dad is not engaged, it's horrible for the social fabric.”

Dave Ramsey explains how manhood and masculinity became "toxic" and why it led to 7.2 million men sitting at home doing NOTHING every day…👀 “Men have been devalued and trivialized and been the villain or the clown of everything for a good 20 years. You don't see a TV commercial where the dad is the hero... he's an idiot. Or a sitcom where the dad is the hero... he's an idiot. The 12-year-old is the smart one, and they smart off through the whole script. And the dad's a doofus and the mother rolls her eyes at the doofus that she picked as a life partner. If you do that to any segment of the economy long enough, eventually they begin to believe it. And so we have 7.2 million men that are able-bodied, able-minded, that are not engaged in the workplace right now. They're doing nothing. They're sitting because the entire culture has said, 'You're a doofus, you're a buffoon, you're valueless. Manhood, masculinity is toxic by its very nature, and so you're of no value.' And the problem is it's destroying not only economics, but social fabric as well because we do know the data on kids, particularly daughters. The cues they take from their dad are devastatingly impactful, good or bad. And so an engaged dad who builds confidence and, gives their daughter hugs growing up, until she leaves home and even after she leaves home, builds a confident daughter. A daughter that is not sexually promiscuous. A daughter that finishes college. A daughter that will not be victimized in the marketplace. That comes from their dads. The data shows that. And so when the dad is not engaged, it's horrible for the social fabric.”

The Iced Coffee Hour

144,544 views • 2 months ago

Whatever struck the Earth at the Younger Dryas boundary is proving extraordinarily difficult to classify - and that difficulty is itself significant. The signature left behind is confusing in a specific and revealing way. The object appears to have been heterogeneous - carrying attributes of both a comet and an asteroid simultaneously. Not one or the other. Both. That combination places it outside the standard categories that impact science was built around and makes the task of reconstructing what actually happened considerably more complex. The geographic reach of the evidence is the detail that keeps expanding with each new study. The proxies - the byproducts and chemical signatures left behind by an impact of this kind - are now being identified across more than half the surface of the Earth. That distribution is not consistent with a localized regional impact. It is consistent with an event of global scale - one that deposited its chemical fingerprint across multiple continents simultaneously. And Randall notes that subsequent research will almost certainly continue to expand that picture. The proxies are turning up wherever researchers look for them - and the full global distribution of the Younger Dryas impact signature is, by all indications, still in the process of being mapped.

Whatever struck the Earth at the Younger Dryas boundary is proving extraordinarily difficult to classify - and that difficulty is itself significant. The signature left behind is confusing in a specific and revealing way. The object appears to have been heterogeneous - carrying attributes of both a comet and an asteroid simultaneously. Not one or the other. Both. That combination places it outside the standard categories that impact science was built around and makes the task of reconstructing what actually happened considerably more complex. The geographic reach of the evidence is the detail that keeps expanding with each new study. The proxies - the byproducts and chemical signatures left behind by an impact of this kind - are now being identified across more than half the surface of the Earth. That distribution is not consistent with a localized regional impact. It is consistent with an event of global scale - one that deposited its chemical fingerprint across multiple continents simultaneously. And Randall notes that subsequent research will almost certainly continue to expand that picture. The proxies are turning up wherever researchers look for them - and the full global distribution of the Younger Dryas impact signature is, by all indications, still in the process of being mapped.

Randall Carlson

28,590 views • 2 months ago

A stunning clinical observation has set a new course in the fight against cancer. Renowned cancer surgeon Dr. Kathleen Ruddy reveals a medical anomaly that challenges everything we know. After 30 years in oncology, having never witnessed a single case of spontaneous remission, Dr. Ruddy saw three patients experience dramatic responses that could only be attributed to one thing: the repurposed drug Ivermectin. The statistical likelihood of this happening by chance? "It's not zero, but it approaches zero." Faced with this incredible signal, the conventional path—a funded clinical trial—was a dead end. "What do you think the likelihood of that is? That's zero. That's flat-out zero." So, what's the next step? Dr. Ruddy found inspiration in one of medicine's most legendary studies: Framingham. Just as the Framingham Heart Study followed a population over decades without intervention, simply collecting data to make landmark discoveries, Dr. Ruddy is launching a groundbreaking initiative. This will be a Framingham-type observational study for cancer patients. The subjects? Patients who, exercising their right to choose, have already decided to use repurposed, FDA-approved drugs like Ivermectin under their physician's guidance. The central question is powerful in its simplicity: Do drugs like Ivermectin improve survival for cancer patients? This is a pivotal moment for data-driven medicine. It’s a direct response to real-world evidence and a refusal to ignore potential breakthroughs hiding in plain sight. If the signal is confirmed, it could revolutionize oncology. This isn't just observation; it's a mission to follow the data, wherever it leads.

A stunning clinical observation has set a new course in the fight against cancer. Renowned cancer surgeon Dr. Kathleen Ruddy reveals a medical anomaly that challenges everything we know. After 30 years in oncology, having never witnessed a single case of spontaneous remission, Dr. Ruddy saw three patients experience dramatic responses that could only be attributed to one thing: the repurposed drug Ivermectin. The statistical likelihood of this happening by chance? "It's not zero, but it approaches zero." Faced with this incredible signal, the conventional path—a funded clinical trial—was a dead end. "What do you think the likelihood of that is? That's zero. That's flat-out zero." So, what's the next step? Dr. Ruddy found inspiration in one of medicine's most legendary studies: Framingham. Just as the Framingham Heart Study followed a population over decades without intervention, simply collecting data to make landmark discoveries, Dr. Ruddy is launching a groundbreaking initiative. This will be a Framingham-type observational study for cancer patients. The subjects? Patients who, exercising their right to choose, have already decided to use repurposed, FDA-approved drugs like Ivermectin under their physician's guidance. The central question is powerful in its simplicity: Do drugs like Ivermectin improve survival for cancer patients? This is a pivotal moment for data-driven medicine. It’s a direct response to real-world evidence and a refusal to ignore potential breakthroughs hiding in plain sight. If the signal is confirmed, it could revolutionize oncology. This isn't just observation; it's a mission to follow the data, wherever it leads.

Camus

135,440 views • 10 months ago

There are many dictatorships in the world. Some seal themselves off within their own borders, trying to block any outside influence of freedom. And others do not recognize borders at all and actively try to destroy the freedom of their neighbors, entire regions, and sometimes even the whole world. When we deal with Russia, we face the second type of threat. It is a mentally unstable dictatorship that cannot accept that in Europe every life matters, human rights are important, and nations can be protected whether they are big or small. Putin cannot accept one simple thing – that somewhere people can live differently and enjoy a life that is not the one he prefers. That is why he has been consistently trying to break someone – not just now, not just for 4 years, but throughout his entire time in power. He is war itself. And anyone who supports Putin cannot fail to understand that they are choosing war. From my address to the European Parliament.

There are many dictatorships in the world. Some seal themselves off within their own borders, trying to block any outside influence of freedom. And others do not recognize borders at all and actively try to destroy the freedom of their neighbors, entire regions, and sometimes even the whole world. When we deal with Russia, we face the second type of threat. It is a mentally unstable dictatorship that cannot accept that in Europe every life matters, human rights are important, and nations can be protected whether they are big or small. Putin cannot accept one simple thing – that somewhere people can live differently and enjoy a life that is not the one he prefers. That is why he has been consistently trying to break someone – not just now, not just for 4 years, but throughout his entire time in power. He is war itself. And anyone who supports Putin cannot fail to understand that they are choosing war. From my address to the European Parliament.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

268,217 views • 4 months ago

Some 19th-century accounts claimed American Indians were a distinct race, created where they were found—not descended from a single ancestral pair. These early writers pointed to monuments, traditions, and flood legends—stories of survival atop high mountains—and argued that Native civilizations were far older than timelines allowed by sacred history or even geology at the time. Whether you agree or not, the antiquity and richness of these traditions remains undeniable.

Some 19th-century accounts claimed American Indians were a distinct race, created where they were found—not descended from a single ancestral pair. These early writers pointed to monuments, traditions, and flood legends—stories of survival atop high mountains—and argued that Native civilizations were far older than timelines allowed by sacred history or even geology at the time. Whether you agree or not, the antiquity and richness of these traditions remains undeniable.

Randall Carlson

35,751 views • 11 months ago

Role Model: New Dolphins QB Malik Willis on whether he felt he was ready to be a starting QB a year or two ago. "I'm not sure. Whether I was ready or not, I can't prove that. That would be just me being arrogant or prideful. But the opportunity's here now, and I'm gonna try to do my best to take advantage of it." Miami has found its franchise quarterback 👀

Role Model: New Dolphins QB Malik Willis on whether he felt he was ready to be a starting QB a year or two ago. "I'm not sure. Whether I was ready or not, I can't prove that. That would be just me being arrogant or prideful. But the opportunity's here now, and I'm gonna try to do my best to take advantage of it." Miami has found its franchise quarterback 👀

Dov Kleiman

504,925 views • 4 months ago

Dr. Bakri says a Russian peptide cut deaths in nursing home patients over 15 years. If you have an aging parent, this study is worth knowing about. Taking it just ten to twenty days a year lowered death across all major diseases. It was pulled from the pineal gland by Soviet scientist Vladimir Khavinson for his study. In his 15-year study, nursing home patients got a short course once a year, alongside a thymus peptide. "They had significantly lower mortality when it came to cardiovascular disease, infectious risk, and cancers." Deaths from heart disease, infection, and cancer all dropped. A few days of treatment a year, and the benefit carried through the rest of it. It's Russian data, so hold it loosely. But for an old parent, that design is hard to ignore. A handful of days dosed each year, and they still lived longer. That peptide is epitalon. — Dr. Abud Bakri (.Abud Bakri MD) on the Huberman Lab podcast (.Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.)

Dr. Bakri says a Russian peptide cut deaths in nursing home patients over 15 years. If you have an aging parent, this study is worth knowing about. Taking it just ten to twenty days a year lowered death across all major diseases. It was pulled from the pineal gland by Soviet scientist Vladimir Khavinson for his study. In his 15-year study, nursing home patients got a short course once a year, alongside a thymus peptide. "They had significantly lower mortality when it came to cardiovascular disease, infectious risk, and cancers." Deaths from heart disease, infection, and cancer all dropped. A few days of treatment a year, and the benefit carried through the rest of it. It's Russian data, so hold it loosely. But for an old parent, that design is hard to ignore. A handful of days dosed each year, and they still lived longer. That peptide is epitalon. — Dr. Abud Bakri (.Abud Bakri MD) on the Huberman Lab podcast (.Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.)

Goku

47,226 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 just responded to Obama's announcement where he denied all the accusations stemming from Obamagate! Pam Bondi has to MAKE ARRESTS! Tulsi: "The fact is that they used already discredited information like the Steele dossier. They knew it was discredited at that time, yet they used it as a source for this document that they claimed to have high confidence in." "They used intelligence that some of these intelligence community professionals rejected previously because of the lack of credibility and the lack of the ability to vet with any kind of confidence, whether or not that information or intelligence was accurate and could be used for an assessment." "There's a long laundry list of facts and intelligence reporting that directly contradict the statement coming from president Obama's office, uh, and those who are trying to deflect away from what actually happened, which was after Donald Trump was elected, uh, led by President Obama, there was an effort to create an a document that would serve as a foundation for what would be a years long coup against President Trump." "Therefore, trying to subvert the will of the American people who sent him to the White House in 2016."

BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 just responded to Obama's announcement where he denied all the accusations stemming from Obamagate! Pam Bondi has to MAKE ARRESTS! Tulsi: "The fact is that they used already discredited information like the Steele dossier. They knew it was discredited at that time, yet they used it as a source for this document that they claimed to have high confidence in." "They used intelligence that some of these intelligence community professionals rejected previously because of the lack of credibility and the lack of the ability to vet with any kind of confidence, whether or not that information or intelligence was accurate and could be used for an assessment." "There's a long laundry list of facts and intelligence reporting that directly contradict the statement coming from president Obama's office, uh, and those who are trying to deflect away from what actually happened, which was after Donald Trump was elected, uh, led by President Obama, there was an effort to create an a document that would serve as a foundation for what would be a years long coup against President Trump." "Therefore, trying to subvert the will of the American people who sent him to the White House in 2016."

Gunther Eagleman™

360,264 views • 1 year ago