正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Here’s an ELITE Leg Press video for y’all that shows PROPER execution Notice: - Continuous tempo - Controlled but not overly long eccentrics - Explosive concentrics - Excellent depth at the bottom - Low-Moderate rep range - Set taken in close proximity to failure TAKE NOTES!

Dean Turner

51,599 subscribers

19,725 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Absolutely ELITE set of Hack Squats right here - Eccentric controlled but not overly slow - Explosive (but controlled) concentrics - Nice range of motion - Fairly continuous reps - Close to failure Good example for you guys to copy 👌🏻

Absolutely ELITE set of Hack Squats right here - Eccentric controlled but not overly slow - Explosive (but controlled) concentrics - Nice range of motion - Fairly continuous reps - Close to failure Good example for you guys to copy 👌🏻

Dean Turner

23,473 次观看 • 11 个月前

Dead center, close up view of Pec Fly Machine done PROPERLY What do you notice? Ah, that’s right… - Arms fixed throughout - NO TREE HUGGING - Explosive concentrics - Controlled eccentrics - Full range of motion deployed Do 2-3 sets like this in a low-moderate rep range close in proximity to failure and your Chest will be SMOKED

Dead center, close up view of Pec Fly Machine done PROPERLY What do you notice? Ah, that’s right… - Arms fixed throughout - NO TREE HUGGING - Explosive concentrics - Controlled eccentrics - Full range of motion deployed Do 2-3 sets like this in a low-moderate rep range close in proximity to failure and your Chest will be SMOKED

Dean Turner

90,039 次观看 • 21 天前

I will leave you guys with one last ELITE technique video to end 2025 Single Arm DB Rows I’ve posted them a few times recently but here’s another good one - Stable position - Eccentrics controlled but not too slow - Explosive concentrics - Not swinging body - Taken to failure

I will leave you guys with one last ELITE technique video to end 2025 Single Arm DB Rows I’ve posted them a few times recently but here’s another good one - Stable position - Eccentrics controlled but not too slow - Explosive concentrics - Not swinging body - Taken to failure

Dean Turner

44,788 次观看 • 7 个月前

If you want to build your Chest… You should WATCH THIS VIDEO! Notice: - Controlled eccentric - Explosive (but still controlled) concentric - Continuous tempo (no camping out at the top) - Ideal ROM - Close in proximity to failure THIS is how your Chest Presses SHOULD look!!!

If you want to build your Chest… You should WATCH THIS VIDEO! Notice: - Controlled eccentric - Explosive (but still controlled) concentric - Continuous tempo (no camping out at the top) - Ideal ROM - Close in proximity to failure THIS is how your Chest Presses SHOULD look!!!

Dean Turner

37,612 次观看 • 6 个月前

Excellent set of Chest Supported T Bar Rows right here Notice: - Elbows driving back - Chest glued to pad - Controlled but not needlessly slow eccentric - Explosive but still under control concentric - Low-Moderate rep range THIS IS HOW IT’S DONE

Excellent set of Chest Supported T Bar Rows right here Notice: - Elbows driving back - Chest glued to pad - Controlled but not needlessly slow eccentric - Explosive but still under control concentric - Low-Moderate rep range THIS IS HOW IT’S DONE

Dean Turner

76,447 次观看 • 7 个月前

I’ll show you EXACTLY how to shave weight off your leg press. Ain’t good for your ego…but great for quad development. 1) Lowest foot stance you can handle while maintaining good foot pressure and experiencing no knee pain. 2) Control your eccentrics and don’t divebomb into the bottom. 3) Go as DEEP as you possibly can for what your anthropometry allows (stay within your active range of motion) 4) No locking out at the top…continuous, fluid reps bullying the quads into submission. Leg press is ELITE when done right!

I’ll show you EXACTLY how to shave weight off your leg press. Ain’t good for your ego…but great for quad development. 1) Lowest foot stance you can handle while maintaining good foot pressure and experiencing no knee pain. 2) Control your eccentrics and don’t divebomb into the bottom. 3) Go as DEEP as you possibly can for what your anthropometry allows (stay within your active range of motion) 4) No locking out at the top…continuous, fluid reps bullying the quads into submission. Leg press is ELITE when done right!

Francis Melia

31,994 次观看 • 6 个月前

If you want to actually train your Chest as efficiently/effectively as possible instead of WASTING YOUR TIME…. I’d recommend doing something like this each week: Upper A - Incline (Clavicular Pecs) Machine Press x 2-3 Sets - Pec Fly Machine x 2-3 Sets Upper B (Performed 3-4 days after Upper A) - Flat/Seated (Sternal Pecs) Machine Press x 2-3 Sets - Seated Low to High Cable Flys x 2-3 Sets This will result in you doing somewhere between 8-12 sets of direct Chest work per week Low likelihood you need any more volume than that to improve your Chest mightily if following the notes below: 1) The ideal rep range to be using when performing the exercises mentioned is the 5ish to 10ish rep range — Choose a weight you can do for 5, 6, 7 reps @ 0-2 RIR…once you can do that weight for 8, 9, 10ish reps, increase the load by 5ish pounds 2) You should perform all reps of all the listed exercises with a controlled (but not overly slow) eccentric and an explosive (but still controlled) concentric 3) You should perform these exercises very early in your workout to ensure they are as efficient/effective as possible — If you perform them later on, you will not get as robust a growth stimulus from the sets because of the outstanding fatigue that will be present from the earlier sets/exercises in your workout Additional notes: - You may sub any of these exercises for comparable exercises due to preferences and/or equipment availability — Ex: Flat/Seated Machine Press subbed for Flat Smith Machine Bench Press or Flat Barbell Bench Press - I probably forgot something that I should’ve mentioned…if I think of it I’ll drop it in the post below

If you want to actually train your Chest as efficiently/effectively as possible instead of WASTING YOUR TIME…. I’d recommend doing something like this each week: Upper A - Incline (Clavicular Pecs) Machine Press x 2-3 Sets - Pec Fly Machine x 2-3 Sets Upper B (Performed 3-4 days after Upper A) - Flat/Seated (Sternal Pecs) Machine Press x 2-3 Sets - Seated Low to High Cable Flys x 2-3 Sets This will result in you doing somewhere between 8-12 sets of direct Chest work per week Low likelihood you need any more volume than that to improve your Chest mightily if following the notes below: 1) The ideal rep range to be using when performing the exercises mentioned is the 5ish to 10ish rep range — Choose a weight you can do for 5, 6, 7 reps @ 0-2 RIR…once you can do that weight for 8, 9, 10ish reps, increase the load by 5ish pounds 2) You should perform all reps of all the listed exercises with a controlled (but not overly slow) eccentric and an explosive (but still controlled) concentric 3) You should perform these exercises very early in your workout to ensure they are as efficient/effective as possible — If you perform them later on, you will not get as robust a growth stimulus from the sets because of the outstanding fatigue that will be present from the earlier sets/exercises in your workout Additional notes: - You may sub any of these exercises for comparable exercises due to preferences and/or equipment availability — Ex: Flat/Seated Machine Press subbed for Flat Smith Machine Bench Press or Flat Barbell Bench Press - I probably forgot something that I should’ve mentioned…if I think of it I’ll drop it in the post below

Dean Turner

40,996 次观看 • 4 个月前

Do you need to train heavy to build muscle? 💪 For years the mantra was you need to go heavy to build muscle. Or you needed to go heavy to stimulate large type II fast twitch fibers but go light for more reps to stimulate smaller type I fibers. But new research has challenged that dogma. Several meta-analysis have shown similar muscle growth with low loads vs high loads when set number is matched & proximity to failure is similar (PMIDs: 28834797, 35015560, 33312275, & 33433148). While muscle hypertrophy was not different between high and low load training, strength increased significantly more with high load training in all these meta-analysis As far as targeting fiber types, it becomes kind of irrelevant when you take an exercise close to failure because fiber types tend to be recruited in order from smallest to largest. So with high load training, small & large fibers get recruited quickly but you don’t do many reps. With low load training, you initially recruit smaller fibers but as the muscle fatigues it is forced to recruit the larger fibers as the exercise is taken close to failure. The net effect is that taking sets close to failure with high or low loads produces a lot of muscle activation and similar hypetrophy The take home is, do what you enjoy if muscle growth is the goal. Just make sure you train HARD & go close to failure (within a few reps) & do enough total sets. But if strength is a priority you’ll need to train heavy & be careful going to failure as it can impair strength gains From my first conversation with Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.

Do you need to train heavy to build muscle? 💪 For years the mantra was you need to go heavy to build muscle. Or you needed to go heavy to stimulate large type II fast twitch fibers but go light for more reps to stimulate smaller type I fibers. But new research has challenged that dogma. Several meta-analysis have shown similar muscle growth with low loads vs high loads when set number is matched & proximity to failure is similar (PMIDs: 28834797, 35015560, 33312275, & 33433148). While muscle hypertrophy was not different between high and low load training, strength increased significantly more with high load training in all these meta-analysis As far as targeting fiber types, it becomes kind of irrelevant when you take an exercise close to failure because fiber types tend to be recruited in order from smallest to largest. So with high load training, small & large fibers get recruited quickly but you don’t do many reps. With low load training, you initially recruit smaller fibers but as the muscle fatigues it is forced to recruit the larger fibers as the exercise is taken close to failure. The net effect is that taking sets close to failure with high or low loads produces a lot of muscle activation and similar hypetrophy The take home is, do what you enjoy if muscle growth is the goal. Just make sure you train HARD & go close to failure (within a few reps) & do enough total sets. But if strength is a priority you’ll need to train heavy & be careful going to failure as it can impair strength gains From my first conversation with Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.

Layne Norton, PhD

53,312 次观看 • 2 年前

How I currently leg press to maximize hypertrophy 🤓 1. No quarter or half repping with tons of weight with your feet high up like a BITCH 2. Choose a weight you can take through a comfortable but reasonably deep range of motion 3. Move feet low enough to have deep but comfortable dorsiflexion (toe stretch to shin) 4. Execute a range of motion that stretches the quads but keeps the tension on them through the entire rep, for me this is when I feel light pressure between my calves and hamstring (I could technically let the weight squish me to such a point that my own hamstring and body are removing tension at the bottom 5. Lay hands on knees for a totally useless safety blanket (ok half serious I do think perceived stability neurologically increases large motor unit recruitment regardless of or in tangent with actual stability but this is just a working theory I have 6. Embrace pain feel sadge For Rep schemes personally I think (after warming up) a heavy first working set 5-10 reps 1-2 reps shy of failure to maximize large motor unit recruitment followed by 1-3 lighter sets within 1-3 reps of failure of 12-15 reps works best because lighter sets following a heavy first set seems to offset the fall-off in strength for the second set due to contrast overcompensation of the muscles (think about how after a heavy set the next set FEELS lighter and often you can take the second set FURTHER) it’s almost like having 2 first sets!

How I currently leg press to maximize hypertrophy 🤓 1. No quarter or half repping with tons of weight with your feet high up like a BITCH 2. Choose a weight you can take through a comfortable but reasonably deep range of motion 3. Move feet low enough to have deep but comfortable dorsiflexion (toe stretch to shin) 4. Execute a range of motion that stretches the quads but keeps the tension on them through the entire rep, for me this is when I feel light pressure between my calves and hamstring (I could technically let the weight squish me to such a point that my own hamstring and body are removing tension at the bottom 5. Lay hands on knees for a totally useless safety blanket (ok half serious I do think perceived stability neurologically increases large motor unit recruitment regardless of or in tangent with actual stability but this is just a working theory I have 6. Embrace pain feel sadge For Rep schemes personally I think (after warming up) a heavy first working set 5-10 reps 1-2 reps shy of failure to maximize large motor unit recruitment followed by 1-3 lighter sets within 1-3 reps of failure of 12-15 reps works best because lighter sets following a heavy first set seems to offset the fall-off in strength for the second set due to contrast overcompensation of the muscles (think about how after a heavy set the next set FEELS lighter and often you can take the second set FURTHER) it’s almost like having 2 first sets!

Hench D. Kunt🥛

24,198 次观看 • 1 年前

How to choose the right weight for your working sets in the gym - You can weight select on a set by set basis - If you’re hitting or exceeding the high end of the rep range, you can/should increase the load even if this means it doesn’t stay uniform on a given day - If you’re falling below or you believe you’re in danger of falling below the low end of the rep range, you can/should decrease the load even if this means it doesn’t stay uniform on a given day - Weight does NOT have to stay uniform across your sets of a given exercise on a given day but you should have a good reason for adding or reducing load Ideal rep range = 5-10ish All sets should end as a result of you hitting failure or your RIR prescription (0-2ish) Is this the ONLY way to train effectively? NO! Is it the most efficient/effective way? YES…or very close

How to choose the right weight for your working sets in the gym - You can weight select on a set by set basis - If you’re hitting or exceeding the high end of the rep range, you can/should increase the load even if this means it doesn’t stay uniform on a given day - If you’re falling below or you believe you’re in danger of falling below the low end of the rep range, you can/should decrease the load even if this means it doesn’t stay uniform on a given day - Weight does NOT have to stay uniform across your sets of a given exercise on a given day but you should have a good reason for adding or reducing load Ideal rep range = 5-10ish All sets should end as a result of you hitting failure or your RIR prescription (0-2ish) Is this the ONLY way to train effectively? NO! Is it the most efficient/effective way? YES…or very close

Dean Turner

23,076 次观看 • 1 个月前

Here’s my take on technique/form/finding the right weight to use for a given exercise: Let’s say you do a set of 8 reps and if we were to rate each rep on quality, the breakdown would be… Rep 1 - 10/10 Rep 2 - 10/10 Rep 3 - 10/10 Rep 4 - 10/10 Rep 5 - 10/10 Rep 6 - 10/10 Rep 7 - 9/10 Rep 8 - 8/10 That is a perfectly acceptable outcome It is an indication that you selected the right weight and did the set properly Now let’s say you do a set of 8 reps and if we were to rate each rep on quality, the breakdown would be… Rep 1 - 10/10 Rep 2 - 10/10 Rep 3 - 10/10 Rep 4 - 9/10 Rep 5 - 8/10 Rep 6 - 7/10 Rep 7 - 6/10 Rep 8 - 5/10 That is a surefire sign you need to reduce the load and pick a weight you can actually handle with better overall technique/form for the FULL DURATION of the set Some minor slippages in technique/form are probably going to happen in plenty of instances when you’re training hard/pushing yourself I’ve often said “your first rep should look very similar to your last rep sans concentric rep velocity” Very similar = it should be close enough Ultimately, there is FINE LINE between (A) pushing hard yet maintaining technique to the point that it could still be considered “pretty good” even when approaching/reaching failure and (B) pushing hard but letting technique fall by the wayside in the pursuit of continuing to move weight from point A to point B by any means necessary Example of elite technique from end to end:

Here’s my take on technique/form/finding the right weight to use for a given exercise: Let’s say you do a set of 8 reps and if we were to rate each rep on quality, the breakdown would be… Rep 1 - 10/10 Rep 2 - 10/10 Rep 3 - 10/10 Rep 4 - 10/10 Rep 5 - 10/10 Rep 6 - 10/10 Rep 7 - 9/10 Rep 8 - 8/10 That is a perfectly acceptable outcome It is an indication that you selected the right weight and did the set properly Now let’s say you do a set of 8 reps and if we were to rate each rep on quality, the breakdown would be… Rep 1 - 10/10 Rep 2 - 10/10 Rep 3 - 10/10 Rep 4 - 9/10 Rep 5 - 8/10 Rep 6 - 7/10 Rep 7 - 6/10 Rep 8 - 5/10 That is a surefire sign you need to reduce the load and pick a weight you can actually handle with better overall technique/form for the FULL DURATION of the set Some minor slippages in technique/form are probably going to happen in plenty of instances when you’re training hard/pushing yourself I’ve often said “your first rep should look very similar to your last rep sans concentric rep velocity” Very similar = it should be close enough Ultimately, there is FINE LINE between (A) pushing hard yet maintaining technique to the point that it could still be considered “pretty good” even when approaching/reaching failure and (B) pushing hard but letting technique fall by the wayside in the pursuit of continuing to move weight from point A to point B by any means necessary Example of elite technique from end to end:

Dean Turner

83,319 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 GAZA: ANTI-HAMAS MILITIA CLAIMS ASSASSINATION An anti-Hamas armed militia in Gaza has taken responsibility for the close-range killing of a senior Hamas police official in Khan Yunis. According to a video released by Hussam al-Astal, commander of an anti-Hamas militia operating in eastern Khan Yunis, his fighters eliminated the head of Hamas’s investigations department. 🔹 The killing was carried out at close range near the official’s home in the Hamas-controlled al-Mawasi area 🔹 Hamas initially blamed Israel’s Shin Bet 🔹 The militia says the target was responsible for torture, killings, and abuse of civilians Al-Astal warned that anyone cooperating with Hamas is “putting their life at risk,” declaring that further assassinations will follow. He also called on Gazans to abandon Hamas, disavow relatives working with the group, and relocate to militia-controlled humanitarian zones. Stay connected, follow Mossad Commentary

🚨 GAZA: ANTI-HAMAS MILITIA CLAIMS ASSASSINATION An anti-Hamas armed militia in Gaza has taken responsibility for the close-range killing of a senior Hamas police official in Khan Yunis. According to a video released by Hussam al-Astal, commander of an anti-Hamas militia operating in eastern Khan Yunis, his fighters eliminated the head of Hamas’s investigations department. 🔹 The killing was carried out at close range near the official’s home in the Hamas-controlled al-Mawasi area 🔹 Hamas initially blamed Israel’s Shin Bet 🔹 The militia says the target was responsible for torture, killings, and abuse of civilians Al-Astal warned that anyone cooperating with Hamas is “putting their life at risk,” declaring that further assassinations will follow. He also called on Gazans to abandon Hamas, disavow relatives working with the group, and relocate to militia-controlled humanitarian zones. Stay connected, follow Mossad Commentary

Mossad Commentary

23,009 次观看 • 7 个月前

A viral footage from Gaza is highlighting a critical reality of modern warfare. In the video, fighters from Al-Qassam Brigades are seen targeting a Merkava tank using a close-range explosive device. Reports suggest the use of a “Shawaz” IED, believed to function like an Explosively Formed Penetrator (EFP) designed to penetrate armored vehicles by focusing explosive energy into a high-speed metal jet. Despite advanced protection systems and surveillance, even modern tanks can be vulnerable at close range, especially in dense urban environments. This incident shows how low-cost, improvised weapons can challenge high-tech military systems. It’s a reminder that in today’s conflicts, strategy and positioning can matter as much as technology. #iran #IranWar #HamasIsISIS #Israel #GazaHumanitarianCrisis #GazaCrisis

A viral footage from Gaza is highlighting a critical reality of modern warfare. In the video, fighters from Al-Qassam Brigades are seen targeting a Merkava tank using a close-range explosive device. Reports suggest the use of a “Shawaz” IED, believed to function like an Explosively Formed Penetrator (EFP) designed to penetrate armored vehicles by focusing explosive energy into a high-speed metal jet. Despite advanced protection systems and surveillance, even modern tanks can be vulnerable at close range, especially in dense urban environments. This incident shows how low-cost, improvised weapons can challenge high-tech military systems. It’s a reminder that in today’s conflicts, strategy and positioning can matter as much as technology. #iran #IranWar #HamasIsISIS #Israel #GazaHumanitarianCrisis #GazaCrisis

Srijan Pal Singh

39,680 次观看 • 3 个月前

#Illini head coach Brad Underwood shouts out his hometown: McPherson, Kansas - in the Elite 8 preview press conference. "An unbelievable little basketball community in Kansas." Here's Coach on his long journey to getting to this point, saying he always worked for winners. "It's been maybe a different path than most, but there's not one step of that I would give up." (Video from NCAA)

#Illini head coach Brad Underwood shouts out his hometown: McPherson, Kansas - in the Elite 8 preview press conference. "An unbelievable little basketball community in Kansas." Here's Coach on his long journey to getting to this point, saying he always worked for winners. "It's been maybe a different path than most, but there's not one step of that I would give up." (Video from NCAA)

Glenn Kinley

103,066 次观看 • 5 个月前

An incredible night at White Hart Lane for Keith Burkinshaw’s Tottenham Hotspur. On May 23rd 1984, Spurs and Anderlecht faced off in the second leg of the 1984 UEFA Cup Final after a 1-1 draw in Belgium. The English side would triumph on penalties, but not before a scare. With just six minutes left, Graham Roberts — who had taken the captain’s armband after Steve Perryman was substituted — grabbed a crucial equaliser to take the game to extra time. Proper captain’s performance.

An incredible night at White Hart Lane for Keith Burkinshaw’s Tottenham Hotspur. On May 23rd 1984, Spurs and Anderlecht faced off in the second leg of the 1984 UEFA Cup Final after a 1-1 draw in Belgium. The English side would triumph on penalties, but not before a scare. With just six minutes left, Graham Roberts — who had taken the captain’s armband after Steve Perryman was substituted — grabbed a crucial equaliser to take the game to extra time. Proper captain’s performance.

When Football Was Better

19,085 次观看 • 3 个月前

Training to failure isn’t needed to max gains? Some people believe that you must take every set to failure in order to maximize muscle gains, but emerging literature suggests this may not be the case A new study examined training to failure vs stopping 1 to 2 reps shy of failure & found that the participants gained the same amount of muscle mass from both training styles There are several strengths to this study. First of all, they used a unilateral design where each participant was their own control by training one leg taking each set to failure and stopping 1-2 reps shy on the other. This helps negate any genetic induced differences since each person is acting as their own control Second, they matched training volumes to the participants previous volumes. This is a HUGE strength that is often overlooked in other studies Third, they used participants that were well trained (at least 3 years resistance training experience) Fourth, they had them all eat in a slight calorie surplus This adds to a growing body of literature demonstrating that training to absolute failure isn’t needed for gains & is likely counterproductive for optimal strength gains due to excess fatigue Interestingly, each group had no difference in total reps performed. That may seem strange when one group is going to failure but the other is stopping 1-2 reps shy. This can be explained by lower inter-set fatigue in the non failure group. For example if a failure group hits failure at 10 reps in set 1, they may only get 8 on the next set, and 6 on the next set. Whereas they might have been able to do 8 reps every set if they didn’t go to all out failure. As such, if you do train to failure I recommend only going to failure on your very last set of an exercise If you want to know how to implement this sort of programming make sure you check out the Biolayne Workoit Builder to get access to all my evidence based programs to help you get strong AF & build muscle 👊

Training to failure isn’t needed to max gains? Some people believe that you must take every set to failure in order to maximize muscle gains, but emerging literature suggests this may not be the case A new study examined training to failure vs stopping 1 to 2 reps shy of failure & found that the participants gained the same amount of muscle mass from both training styles There are several strengths to this study. First of all, they used a unilateral design where each participant was their own control by training one leg taking each set to failure and stopping 1-2 reps shy on the other. This helps negate any genetic induced differences since each person is acting as their own control Second, they matched training volumes to the participants previous volumes. This is a HUGE strength that is often overlooked in other studies Third, they used participants that were well trained (at least 3 years resistance training experience) Fourth, they had them all eat in a slight calorie surplus This adds to a growing body of literature demonstrating that training to absolute failure isn’t needed for gains & is likely counterproductive for optimal strength gains due to excess fatigue Interestingly, each group had no difference in total reps performed. That may seem strange when one group is going to failure but the other is stopping 1-2 reps shy. This can be explained by lower inter-set fatigue in the non failure group. For example if a failure group hits failure at 10 reps in set 1, they may only get 8 on the next set, and 6 on the next set. Whereas they might have been able to do 8 reps every set if they didn’t go to all out failure. As such, if you do train to failure I recommend only going to failure on your very last set of an exercise If you want to know how to implement this sort of programming make sure you check out the Biolayne Workoit Builder to get access to all my evidence based programs to help you get strong AF & build muscle 👊

Layne Norton, PhD

48,374 次观看 • 2 年前

Not only is this completely wrong, but it’s negligent and potentially harmful. An isokinetic dynamometer is the gold standard for assessing force production and how quickly you can produce that force, which is vital for reducing the risk of injury. A single leg squat doesn’t come close to reproducing the forces experienced during sport, which is why knee valgus during a single leg squat is NOT a risk factor for injury (Nilstad 2021, Petushek 2021). Many clinicians are using the traditional hop tests less (at least in isolation) because research consistently shows that patients may demonstrate symmetry by compensating or unintentionally performing worse on their uninvolved leg (Wren 2018). And the forward reach is 100% not an appropriate substitute. There’s only so much information that can be put into a 60 second video. Check out these resources to learn more:

Not only is this completely wrong, but it’s negligent and potentially harmful. An isokinetic dynamometer is the gold standard for assessing force production and how quickly you can produce that force, which is vital for reducing the risk of injury. A single leg squat doesn’t come close to reproducing the forces experienced during sport, which is why knee valgus during a single leg squat is NOT a risk factor for injury (Nilstad 2021, Petushek 2021). Many clinicians are using the traditional hop tests less (at least in isolation) because research consistently shows that patients may demonstrate symmetry by compensating or unintentionally performing worse on their uninvolved leg (Wren 2018). And the forward reach is 100% not an appropriate substitute. There’s only so much information that can be put into a 60 second video. Check out these resources to learn more:

E3Rehab

114,997 次观看 • 2 年前