Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
How a Third-Party Zero-Day Let Hackers Drain $388 Million From Bitget "Permissionless doesn't mean neutral." ๐ก๏ธ Gracy Chen @Bitget told me that's the stance she wants from DeFi, after NEAR Intents helped freeze stolen Bitget funds and THORChain declined her request. ๐ง Timestamps: ๐จ 01:50 How attackers used a... show more
15,509 views โข 12 days ago โขvia X (Twitter)
20 Comments

"Permissionless doesn't mean neutral" refutes itself. It's non-sensical and illiterate. Here let me help: Non-neutral means someone decides which transactions pass. Deciding which transactions pass is called permission. Is the actual demand: "DeFi should be permissioned"?

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain Invite someone from @Thorchain onto your show so they can tell their side or shut the fuck up Cowardly hypocrite bitch Paid shill

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain hey Laura why don't you talk directly with thorchain's cofounder ?

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain Permissionless does not mean neutral. So ETH is not credibly neutral? What is this being pushed?

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain 1k views and 2 likes. LOL LMAO, even

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain "Permissionless doesn't mean neutral" assumes there is a someone who can say no.

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain This is a question for prod. Why do the tickers on the low part pf the screen dont update? Like it says HYPE is trading at $18 and ZEC at 42$. This prices are like from 2025.

Your liquidity can do more than one job. So why force it into one pool? ๐ค 1inch Aqua lets the same liquidity back multiple positions. Thanks to @1inch for supporting Unchained.

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain It would be very important in the name of fair and balanced journalism to have a representative from the @THORChain project on your podcast.

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain You are missing all the point: "Bitget CEO should be more concentrated in their own affairs not blaming this and that. That seems incompetent from her". The hack happened in her house so ALL THE blame should be on her and her team. If this continues, then something isn't right

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain permissionless vs neutral is the real debate

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain Am I missing something here, but who even is this old lady spouting, pro censorship, CEX Simp content?? Never heard of her before in the real crypto space and doubt i will once this paid and promoted smear campaign has blown over again.

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain Permissionless doesn't mean neutral is spot on

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain I measured $573,226 in THORChain liquidity fees from tracked swaps. Seven affiliates received another $259,718 and have additional financial links to the hackers' wallets.

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain security needs constant evolution in DeFi

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain Not a serious reporter, just a people pleaser. Terrible job, should've been more inquisitive towards someone who just lost her customer's funds instead of letting them spread misinformation blaming others.

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain THORChain said no when NEAR Intents helped freeze funds wild

@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain pretty calm and composed for someone in her situation legit respect
@GracyBitget @near_intents @bitget @THORChain That 19:04 segment on how they froze the funds is wild โ a $388M drain getting clawed back through NEAR Intents while THORChain said no is a story DeFi twitter will argue about for years.
