Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

“I don’t believe that special needs are a justification for killing someone,” says Allie Beth Stuckey. She lists these categories: • Age • Location • Size • Sentience • Dependency These all apply to ppl OUTSIDE the womb, too- which is why Allie says we started at abortion &...

24,415 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

One thing you’ll notice with complementarians in general and Allie Beth Stuckey in particular is a major focus on utilitarian arguments: “What I’m doing is working. I’m really good at it. How can you say that this is wrong?” Allie Beth concedes that men in general are more suited for the public sphere than women, but that does not mean that all men are cut out for it and that all women are not. It’s very clear that Stuckey sees herself as the exception that proves the rule. She is the unique and special snowflake that can fight the culture war as well or better than any man. As evidence, Allie cites the Jubilee episode where she debated 20 leftists cosplaying as Christians. This event really went to her head. She got near universal praise for her performance (not from me), and it’s clear that she believes that no one could have done a better job. But is that true? I question the wisdom of sending a woman into this arena, especially with so many gay men involved. This was obviously a controlled environment, but the outside world is not. A young lady that attempts to follow Stuckey’s example is putting herself in mortal danger. The chances of an interaction getting violent are insanely high. Allie holding her own (if she even did) on that show doesn’t make it right. Also, in general, I don’t believe debate shows are worthwhile at all. We’ve won the debate. We need to start acting like it. The last thing we should be doing is platforming gay slop perspectives. And finally, the passive aggression comes out. Allie does not like being told that she’s not cut out for this or that a man could do better. Just watch the last 20 seconds. You’ll see what I mean. Should I keep going? Have you been punished enough? Have I been punished enough? 🙃

Defiant Baptist

24,416 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

FLASHBACK: Three years ago, Allie Beth Stuckey went on the (unmarried) Alex Clark podcast to discuss marriage and parenting. The talk about wives submitting to husbands was quite telling. 1) Alex says they have the healthy, biblical version of submission, as opposed to those in the trad movement who have a warped, distorted view of it. 2) Allie mentions criticism she has received that she rejects the traditional view of marriage and family. She actually does reject them, since she’s the breadwinner for her family, works outside the home, and her husband is her employee (agent). 3) Allie counters this by saying that she affirms biblical marriage as well as the exhortations to wives and husbands in Ephesians 5. 4) Allie claims that “submission” is a scary word for women. Gosh, I wonder why that is? Maybe it’s the feminism pushed by people like her. 5) Alex immediately pivots to the husband’s responsibility, that their duty (which is unconditional) is also a lot on their shoulders. Allie affirms this sacrificial love as being counter-cultural in the first century. Neither gal has even attempted to address what submission means for a wife. 6) Finally, Allie explains what submission does NOT mean. It does not imply that husbands should not consult their wives. So there you have it. Wives are to submit to their husbands, but don’t forget what husbands are supposed to do, and don’t forget all the caveats for wives with respect to submission! And all of this is coming from two working women, one of whom isn’t even married. Isn’t complementarianism fun?! 🙃

Defiant Baptist

63,087 просмотров • 29 дней назад