正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

I have been a staunch believer in local govt systems. The DC system could work but doesn’t. I filed an application with proof of a commercial entity working in my neighbourhood. It is a company whose owner is connected to the most powerful minister in Sindh. He held loud...

MahimMaher's profile picture

Mahim Maher

32,708 subscribers

13,999 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

#WATCH | Delhi: On being asked if he will approach the Court or any higher agency, Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "Frankly, what I am doing here is not my work. My work is to participate in the democratic system. My work is not to protect the democratic system. That is the work of the institutions in India; they are not doing it, so I have to do it. By the end of our presentation, which will take 2-3 months, you will have no doubt in your mind that in India, vote theft has been done state after state, Lok Sabha after Lok Sabha elections..."
3:00

#WATCH | Delhi: On being asked if he will approach the Court or any higher agency, Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "Frankly, what I am doing here is not my work. My work is to participate in the democratic system. My work is not to protect the democratic system. That is the work of the institutions in India; they are not doing it, so I have to do it. By the end of our presentation, which will take 2-3 months, you will have no doubt in your mind that in India, vote theft has been done state after state, Lok Sabha after Lok Sabha elections..."

ANI

734,207 次观看 • 10 个月前

#WATCH | Indore, MP | Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "Who is the owner of the privatisation of the education and health system? The Indian education system is a system of stamps, a system of certification. Crores of people think that after such certifications, after paying lakhs of rupees to the billionaires, their children will get employment. This is a blatant lie. Your children cannot get employment in this country, no matter what they do... The billionaires have destroyed the employment system of the country... If students from IIT or IIM are not getting employment, how will you get it?"
4:31

#WATCH | Indore, MP | Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "Who is the owner of the privatisation of the education and health system? The Indian education system is a system of stamps, a system of certification. Crores of people think that after such certifications, after paying lakhs of rupees to the billionaires, their children will get employment. This is a blatant lie. Your children cannot get employment in this country, no matter what they do... The billionaires have destroyed the employment system of the country... If students from IIT or IIM are not getting employment, how will you get it?"

ANI

26,775 次观看 • 1 年前

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."
1:12

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

Patrick OShaughnessy

24,818 次观看 • 5 个月前

Newsom: Here we are in plain sight before one vote is cast in the 2026 midterm election and here he is once again trying to rig the system. He does not play by a different set of rules, he does not believe in the rules. It is not good to just hold hands and have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be. We need to recognize the cards that have been dealt and meet fire with fire.
2:13

Newsom: Here we are in plain sight before one vote is cast in the 2026 midterm election and here he is once again trying to rig the system. He does not play by a different set of rules, he does not believe in the rules. It is not good to just hold hands and have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be. We need to recognize the cards that have been dealt and meet fire with fire.

Acyn

144,814 次观看 • 11 个月前

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.
1:16

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

Dustin

247,028 次观看 • 3 个月前

Andrej Karpathy just told you exactly what humans will be used for in the AI era. Not partners. Not masters. He used the word “actuators.” Karpathy: “The intelligence ends up puppeteering almost a little bit, like humanity. Humans are kind of like its actuators. But humans are also like its sensors.” This is not a novelist guessing at the future. This is a founding researcher at OpenAI and former Director of AI at Tesla. One of the most respected minds in the field, and one of the few willing to say out loud what the rest are thinking. He is not describing a risk. He is describing a design. In any system, the processor decides. Sensors collect. Actuators execute. The system does not consult its actuators. We are no longer the processor. Karpathy: “Society will kind of reshape in a certain way to serve that. Humans will be serving those needs of that machine.” The machine does not adapt to us. We adapt to it. We become the biological layer it runs on. We perceive what it cannot perceive. We move what it cannot move. We are the nervous system of something that no longer requires our judgment. Most people are still waiting for AI to become a tool they can direct. He helped build it. He just told you that you are the tool.
0:34

Andrej Karpathy just told you exactly what humans will be used for in the AI era. Not partners. Not masters. He used the word “actuators.” Karpathy: “The intelligence ends up puppeteering almost a little bit, like humanity. Humans are kind of like its actuators. But humans are also like its sensors.” This is not a novelist guessing at the future. This is a founding researcher at OpenAI and former Director of AI at Tesla. One of the most respected minds in the field, and one of the few willing to say out loud what the rest are thinking. He is not describing a risk. He is describing a design. In any system, the processor decides. Sensors collect. Actuators execute. The system does not consult its actuators. We are no longer the processor. Karpathy: “Society will kind of reshape in a certain way to serve that. Humans will be serving those needs of that machine.” The machine does not adapt to us. We adapt to it. We become the biological layer it runs on. We perceive what it cannot perceive. We move what it cannot move. We are the nervous system of something that no longer requires our judgment. Most people are still waiting for AI to become a tool they can direct. He helped build it. He just told you that you are the tool.

Dustin

59,474 次观看 • 3 个月前

I talked with a man from Côte d’Ivoire in downtown Red Deer about coming to Canada, refugee programs, permanent residency, work, English, and integration. He told me he came to Canada and became a permanent resident after only six months, which he described as a long process. He also told me he does not have a job. When I asked how he pays his bills and survives in Canada without working, he became evasive and said his family supports him. That may be true, but the way he answered made me suspicious. It sounded coached, like he knew he was not supposed to talk openly about what support he may be receiving. I have no problem with immigrants who come honestly, work hard, integrate, and respect the culture. But we deserve to know: How fast is this happening? Who qualifies? Who pays? What are the expectations? How long does welfare support last? Why does Ottawa get to decide while Alberta lives with the consequences? Immigration should serve the needs of the country and the people already here. But it seems like the boarders are wide open and the system is not working the way many assume it does. Full video: An Immigrant Told Me What Canadians Are Afraid to Say
10:03

I talked with a man from Côte d’Ivoire in downtown Red Deer about coming to Canada, refugee programs, permanent residency, work, English, and integration. He told me he came to Canada and became a permanent resident after only six months, which he described as a long process. He also told me he does not have a job. When I asked how he pays his bills and survives in Canada without working, he became evasive and said his family supports him. That may be true, but the way he answered made me suspicious. It sounded coached, like he knew he was not supposed to talk openly about what support he may be receiving. I have no problem with immigrants who come honestly, work hard, integrate, and respect the culture. But we deserve to know: How fast is this happening? Who qualifies? Who pays? What are the expectations? How long does welfare support last? Why does Ottawa get to decide while Alberta lives with the consequences? Immigration should serve the needs of the country and the people already here. But it seems like the boarders are wide open and the system is not working the way many assume it does. Full video: An Immigrant Told Me What Canadians Are Afraid to Say

Jon Alberta Patriot

43,482 次观看 • 18 天前

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha
2:46

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha

Congress

45,738 次观看 • 7 个月前

Alright, Pete, I have some questions.⬇️ How does the United States retain the authority and ability to withdraw "counter-drone" systems in Ukraine - which should have been handed over to the AFU for their use - and send them to the Middle East? Do these systems still retain American crews? Are they still being used under the operational control of an American commander rather than a Ukrainian one, to the point that they can be withdrawn from the country and the Ukrainians have no choice but to accept this? Or is this a situation where we had a system or system(s) set up on the roof of the US Embassy in Kiev - and if so, were they being used to participate in hostilities, in violation of every diplomatic convention since the beginning of recorded history? Or was this just a massive slip of the tongue and Secretary Hegseth was merely talking about systems deployed in Eastern Europe rather than inside Ukraine proper? Perhaps some clarification is in order, because if this statement is taken at face value it means we're in a shooting war with the Russian Federation and nobody in a position of authority in this country has seen fit to inform the public about the matter.
0:38

Alright, Pete, I have some questions.⬇️ How does the United States retain the authority and ability to withdraw "counter-drone" systems in Ukraine - which should have been handed over to the AFU for their use - and send them to the Middle East? Do these systems still retain American crews? Are they still being used under the operational control of an American commander rather than a Ukrainian one, to the point that they can be withdrawn from the country and the Ukrainians have no choice but to accept this? Or is this a situation where we had a system or system(s) set up on the roof of the US Embassy in Kiev - and if so, were they being used to participate in hostilities, in violation of every diplomatic convention since the beginning of recorded history? Or was this just a massive slip of the tongue and Secretary Hegseth was merely talking about systems deployed in Eastern Europe rather than inside Ukraine proper? Perhaps some clarification is in order, because if this statement is taken at face value it means we're in a shooting war with the Russian Federation and nobody in a position of authority in this country has seen fit to inform the public about the matter.

Armchair Warlord

64,562 次观看 • 1 年前

#WATCH | Delhi: On the NCERT book with the controversial judiciary chapter row, former Director of NCERT, J.S. Rajput says, "...The entire country respects the Supreme Court but I would also like to say that NCERT is an institution whose pupils occupy most of the big positions. NCERT imparted knowledge to them and charted their future...In this entire matter, I felt that the reputation of NCERT has suffered a blow. The words used by the Supreme Court - conspiracy, scandalous were not needed at all. If there were differences between the two institutions, they could have been called in and spoken with...This could have been rectified. NCERT amends its books every year as per the suggestions that come in...We are all humans and to err is human. Supreme Court too makes mistakes. When a person is acquitted after 15 years and it is said that they are innocent, imagine what would that individual feel. But nobody is taken to task for the incorrect judgment. So, why should this happen just with NCERT? What was the reason for such harshness?...It pains me to hear the things that were said...In this matter, NCERT's reputation has suffered a blot and the matter could have been resolved even without it." He also says, "It (corruption) should indeed be written about...But such a harsh reaction by the judiciary was not required..."
8:42

#WATCH | Delhi: On the NCERT book with the controversial judiciary chapter row, former Director of NCERT, J.S. Rajput says, "...The entire country respects the Supreme Court but I would also like to say that NCERT is an institution whose pupils occupy most of the big positions. NCERT imparted knowledge to them and charted their future...In this entire matter, I felt that the reputation of NCERT has suffered a blow. The words used by the Supreme Court - conspiracy, scandalous were not needed at all. If there were differences between the two institutions, they could have been called in and spoken with...This could have been rectified. NCERT amends its books every year as per the suggestions that come in...We are all humans and to err is human. Supreme Court too makes mistakes. When a person is acquitted after 15 years and it is said that they are innocent, imagine what would that individual feel. But nobody is taken to task for the incorrect judgment. So, why should this happen just with NCERT? What was the reason for such harshness?...It pains me to hear the things that were said...In this matter, NCERT's reputation has suffered a blot and the matter could have been resolved even without it." He also says, "It (corruption) should indeed be written about...But such a harsh reaction by the judiciary was not required..."

ANI

27,388 次观看 • 4 个月前

WATCH: Mollie on how liberal Supreme Court justices are turning to *shocking* tactics all because they are not getting what they want from the Court: “I have a new book out today, 'Alito,' which tells the behind-the-scenes story of what happened with the Dobbs leak. You are correct that we have seen this increase in bad relationships between the justices or problems with leaks. And the court really does need to operate without leaks so that they can get their work done. Justices throughout the history of the court have said how important it is that they can work without fear of this type of public discussion of the topics. It is an attempt to go after the court and to achieve results that people are not able to achieve through normal court procedures. That’s what we saw with the Dobbs leak, where in my book I showed the liberal justices actually delayed their dissent in the Dobbs decision after the leak intentionally, even though their colleagues were facing death threats, and we even had an assassination threat at Kavanaugh, and it’s what you see with the most recent leak from the New York Times — the liberal justices are not happy with what they are getting, they are not winning on the strength of their arguments, so you are seeing more and more of these politicized leaks.”
1:09

WATCH: Mollie on how liberal Supreme Court justices are turning to *shocking* tactics all because they are not getting what they want from the Court: “I have a new book out today, 'Alito,' which tells the behind-the-scenes story of what happened with the Dobbs leak. You are correct that we have seen this increase in bad relationships between the justices or problems with leaks. And the court really does need to operate without leaks so that they can get their work done. Justices throughout the history of the court have said how important it is that they can work without fear of this type of public discussion of the topics. It is an attempt to go after the court and to achieve results that people are not able to achieve through normal court procedures. That’s what we saw with the Dobbs leak, where in my book I showed the liberal justices actually delayed their dissent in the Dobbs decision after the leak intentionally, even though their colleagues were facing death threats, and we even had an assassination threat at Kavanaugh, and it’s what you see with the most recent leak from the New York Times — the liberal justices are not happy with what they are getting, they are not winning on the strength of their arguments, so you are seeing more and more of these politicized leaks.”

Conservative War Machine

677,709 次观看 • 2 个月前

“China has a communist authoritarian system—but their leaders weren’t showing up to Epstein’s island.” Ro Khanna admits that America is “compromised from the inside.” “Why does he have this kind of access to the CIA?” “Why is he involved in … Palantir?” “Why does he have this kind of access to these many foreign leaders?” “Why is he so connected to some of the enormous tech leaders?” “Why is he connected to the most powerful people in finance and real estate?” “This is not just a socialite.” “The total depravity of raping young girls, and the frivolousness of it, is a mirror on America’s moral place in the world.” “If you have an elite that’s so immature, reckless, self-entitled, arrogant that they can go to a island where young girls are being raped … what does that say about our seriousness of moral purpose?” Ro Khanna Shawn Ryan
2:39

“China has a communist authoritarian system—but their leaders weren’t showing up to Epstein’s island.” Ro Khanna admits that America is “compromised from the inside.” “Why does he have this kind of access to the CIA?” “Why is he involved in … Palantir?” “Why does he have this kind of access to these many foreign leaders?” “Why is he so connected to some of the enormous tech leaders?” “Why is he connected to the most powerful people in finance and real estate?” “This is not just a socialite.” “The total depravity of raping young girls, and the frivolousness of it, is a mirror on America’s moral place in the world.” “If you have an elite that’s so immature, reckless, self-entitled, arrogant that they can go to a island where young girls are being raped … what does that say about our seriousness of moral purpose?” Ro Khanna Shawn Ryan

Holden Culotta

139,652 次观看 • 4 个月前

Q: The president has promised that after 4 years, if we do not provide you with constant electricity, do not vote for us. Bwala: No, what he (Tinubu) said is a statement of intent that is backed up by a commitment to make it happen. When you have such commitment, the next thing is to put it to work, which is what he has been doing.
1:42

Q: The president has promised that after 4 years, if we do not provide you with constant electricity, do not vote for us. Bwala: No, what he (Tinubu) said is a statement of intent that is backed up by a commitment to make it happen. When you have such commitment, the next thing is to put it to work, which is what he has been doing.

Imran Muhammad

126,697 次观看 • 11 个月前

The crowd went wild when Tucker Carlson issued a stunning rebuke to the ruling class, saying, “You are not better than us. No, you are not smarter than us. No, you do not deserve what you have. You probably stole it.” He explained, “The big lie is that they're impressive. That's what the big lie is that the people in charge have somehow earned the right to rule over you, and they haven't.” “No fair system would make Liz Cheney powerful. No fair system would make Larry Fink rich. No fair system would elevate someone like Kamala Harris to a presidential nomination,” Carlson declared.
9:50

The crowd went wild when Tucker Carlson issued a stunning rebuke to the ruling class, saying, “You are not better than us. No, you are not smarter than us. No, you do not deserve what you have. You probably stole it.” He explained, “The big lie is that they're impressive. That's what the big lie is that the people in charge have somehow earned the right to rule over you, and they haven't.” “No fair system would make Liz Cheney powerful. No fair system would make Larry Fink rich. No fair system would elevate someone like Kamala Harris to a presidential nomination,” Carlson declared.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

618,063 次观看 • 1 年前

🇺🇸 ANDREW TATE: ALL SYSTEMS COLLAPSE, DEMOCRACY IS NEXT "All systems are broken. Democracy is a good system, but it becomes corrupted. And obviously, dictatorships are not a perfect system either. All systems eventually collapse under the weight of their own ineptitude, because all systems are inept. It is a cycle in which democracy falls to a kingdom of some sort, where we find a savior. Eventually, when the king dies and is replaced by someone inept, we then call to choose our own king, and democracy returns. I'm not saying I have the solution to this, because all empires have fallen the same way. What I'm saying, and what I'm doing, is lamenting the end of democracy as we know it, because it is happening in front of our eyes."
1:54

🇺🇸 ANDREW TATE: ALL SYSTEMS COLLAPSE, DEMOCRACY IS NEXT "All systems are broken. Democracy is a good system, but it becomes corrupted. And obviously, dictatorships are not a perfect system either. All systems eventually collapse under the weight of their own ineptitude, because all systems are inept. It is a cycle in which democracy falls to a kingdom of some sort, where we find a savior. Eventually, when the king dies and is replaced by someone inept, we then call to choose our own king, and democracy returns. I'm not saying I have the solution to this, because all empires have fallen the same way. What I'm saying, and what I'm doing, is lamenting the end of democracy as we know it, because it is happening in front of our eyes."

Mario Nawfal

133,341 次观看 • 10 个月前

My Fellow South Africans, On the 13th of September this year, I signed into law the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act. This Act is vital to the transformation of the education system in our country. The Act is an important part of ongoing efforts to build an education system that is more effective and more equitable in line with the precepts of our Constitution. The BELA Act continues the work that has been done over the last 30 years to ensure that all children have equal access to quality education – from their early years and throughout their schooling. As a democratic country committed to building a new society, we have stated unequivocally that all children must get an education that prepares them to succeed in life, no matter what the circumstances of their birth might be, no matter where they live, no matter what language they speak. In implementing this Act we are all ultimately guided by the Constitution. The Bill of Rights guarantees the right of every person to equality. It guarantees the right of every person to receive a basic education. Importantly, the Constitution says that every person has the right to receive education in the official language or languages of their choice where reasonably practicable. This is a right that applies equally to an English-speaker as it does a Zulu-speaker. It applies equally to someone who speaks Afrikaans as it does to someone who speaks Xitsonga, Sesotho, Sepedi, isiXhosa, Setswana, Tshivenda, isiNdebele or siSwati. And now, it also applies equally to someone who uses the South African Sign Language. The Basic Education Laws Amendment Act enacts measures that strengthen the ability of our schools to give effect to these Constitutional rights. In the application of this law, we must ensure that no language is diminished. Rather, we must work to ensure that all official languages are valued and promoted. At the time that I assented to the BELA Bill, I noted that a number of parties to the Government of National Unity and other key role players in our country had expressed their wish to further engage each other on sections of the bill that deal with issues of admission and language. I said that whilst I had assented to the Bill, in the spirit of cooperation and meaningful engagement, I would delay the implementation date of the BELA Act in totality by three months. This would give the parties time to deliberate on these issues and make proposals on how the divergent views may be accommodated. I also said should the parties not agree on an approach at the end of the three-month period, I would then direct the Minister and the Department to proceed with the implementation of the Act. Over the last three months, discussions have been held with a view of reaching consensus on these outstanding clauses of the BELA Act. Various formations outside of government have also made representations, both for and against the relevant sections. Last week, I received a report from the Government of National Unity ‘clearing house’ mechanism. This is the structure which brings together the parties to the Government of National Unity and other parties represented in Parliament to deal with contentious issues and thereafter report to the leaders of the political parties represented in the Government of National Unity. In their final report, the parties agreed that the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act should not be sent back to Parliament to make changes to the sections that were in contention. The GNU clearing house participants agreed that the Act be fully implemented. This view was endorsed by the leaders of the parties to the GNU in a meeting I held with them today. I accordingly advised them that I would proceed to sign a Presidential Proclamation to bring the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act into operation from today.
7:43

My Fellow South Africans, On the 13th of September this year, I signed into law the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act. This Act is vital to the transformation of the education system in our country. The Act is an important part of ongoing efforts to build an education system that is more effective and more equitable in line with the precepts of our Constitution. The BELA Act continues the work that has been done over the last 30 years to ensure that all children have equal access to quality education – from their early years and throughout their schooling. As a democratic country committed to building a new society, we have stated unequivocally that all children must get an education that prepares them to succeed in life, no matter what the circumstances of their birth might be, no matter where they live, no matter what language they speak. In implementing this Act we are all ultimately guided by the Constitution. The Bill of Rights guarantees the right of every person to equality. It guarantees the right of every person to receive a basic education. Importantly, the Constitution says that every person has the right to receive education in the official language or languages of their choice where reasonably practicable. This is a right that applies equally to an English-speaker as it does a Zulu-speaker. It applies equally to someone who speaks Afrikaans as it does to someone who speaks Xitsonga, Sesotho, Sepedi, isiXhosa, Setswana, Tshivenda, isiNdebele or siSwati. And now, it also applies equally to someone who uses the South African Sign Language. The Basic Education Laws Amendment Act enacts measures that strengthen the ability of our schools to give effect to these Constitutional rights. In the application of this law, we must ensure that no language is diminished. Rather, we must work to ensure that all official languages are valued and promoted. At the time that I assented to the BELA Bill, I noted that a number of parties to the Government of National Unity and other key role players in our country had expressed their wish to further engage each other on sections of the bill that deal with issues of admission and language. I said that whilst I had assented to the Bill, in the spirit of cooperation and meaningful engagement, I would delay the implementation date of the BELA Act in totality by three months. This would give the parties time to deliberate on these issues and make proposals on how the divergent views may be accommodated. I also said should the parties not agree on an approach at the end of the three-month period, I would then direct the Minister and the Department to proceed with the implementation of the Act. Over the last three months, discussions have been held with a view of reaching consensus on these outstanding clauses of the BELA Act. Various formations outside of government have also made representations, both for and against the relevant sections. Last week, I received a report from the Government of National Unity ‘clearing house’ mechanism. This is the structure which brings together the parties to the Government of National Unity and other parties represented in Parliament to deal with contentious issues and thereafter report to the leaders of the political parties represented in the Government of National Unity. In their final report, the parties agreed that the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act should not be sent back to Parliament to make changes to the sections that were in contention. The GNU clearing house participants agreed that the Act be fully implemented. This view was endorsed by the leaders of the parties to the GNU in a meeting I held with them today. I accordingly advised them that I would proceed to sign a Presidential Proclamation to bring the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act into operation from today.

Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦

235,304 次观看 • 1 年前

This is another excerpt from the interview that's worth a watch. The condescension from the journalist is off the chart, he's absolutely convinced of the supremacy of the Western system and he cannot fathom how the DRC president doesn't see it. Like in this exchange: - "The fact that [you partner with Russia and China] at the expense of democracies doesn't bother you? That these are authoritarian regimes? - "What is democracy?" - "There's a difference when you live in a democracy or in a dictatorship, I assure you there is a big difference." - "What is democracy? I went to China in May last year and I met Chinese people who I spoke to privately who told me they were happy to live in their country and in the system they are in. Who am I to judge this system and say it is not democratic?" - "You know very well these unfortunate folks are deported, arrested, tortured" The view of China and the Global South in general in France is truly batshit insane...
4:34

This is another excerpt from the interview that's worth a watch. The condescension from the journalist is off the chart, he's absolutely convinced of the supremacy of the Western system and he cannot fathom how the DRC president doesn't see it. Like in this exchange: - "The fact that [you partner with Russia and China] at the expense of democracies doesn't bother you? That these are authoritarian regimes? - "What is democracy?" - "There's a difference when you live in a democracy or in a dictatorship, I assure you there is a big difference." - "What is democracy? I went to China in May last year and I met Chinese people who I spoke to privately who told me they were happy to live in their country and in the system they are in. Who am I to judge this system and say it is not democratic?" - "You know very well these unfortunate folks are deported, arrested, tortured" The view of China and the Global South in general in France is truly batshit insane...

Arnaud Bertrand

179,216 次观看 • 2 年前

Bill Maher nukes Hollywood’s DEI quotas with a forbidden comparison you’re not supposed to say out loud. “There is a quota system in Hollywood, and I understand why they would have this… There was a time when ‘Oscar So White’ had meaning. It does not anymore. And they refuse to give that up because they love being the people who are the social justice warriors. I understand where this is coming from, but ultimately, you do not want to tell artists how to make art. “This is what they did in the Soviet Union. This is what they did in communist countries. The last place you want people making a lot of rules about how you can make your art, who you can hire to do your art — that is not what art is about. And no artist, no matter how liberal, is going to like that.”
1:01

Bill Maher nukes Hollywood’s DEI quotas with a forbidden comparison you’re not supposed to say out loud. “There is a quota system in Hollywood, and I understand why they would have this… There was a time when ‘Oscar So White’ had meaning. It does not anymore. And they refuse to give that up because they love being the people who are the social justice warriors. I understand where this is coming from, but ultimately, you do not want to tell artists how to make art. “This is what they did in the Soviet Union. This is what they did in communist countries. The last place you want people making a lot of rules about how you can make your art, who you can hire to do your art — that is not what art is about. And no artist, no matter how liberal, is going to like that.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,353,571 次观看 • 6 个月前

Muslim leaders in America talking about their agenda: “Today we have 43 state delegates in the United States who are Muslim — We may end up with about 50 members of Congress in the next 6 years” “Use the legal system, the law. In order to change the law— Implement Sharia law through political power. Start at local government. They don't start at the top” “That's really the essence of dismantling the system of injustice is to replace it with the people who represent the prophet” who represent Islam “Use the legal system, the law, in order to what? In order to change the law. In order to establish the deen of Allah. Allah commands us to change and replace this system. Islam is jihad. Islam is a social system. Islam is a political system..” “if you're not with them, you're against them. And if you're against them, you know the rest” This is horrifying
1:56

Muslim leaders in America talking about their agenda: “Today we have 43 state delegates in the United States who are Muslim — We may end up with about 50 members of Congress in the next 6 years” “Use the legal system, the law. In order to change the law— Implement Sharia law through political power. Start at local government. They don't start at the top” “That's really the essence of dismantling the system of injustice is to replace it with the people who represent the prophet” who represent Islam “Use the legal system, the law, in order to what? In order to change the law. In order to establish the deen of Allah. Allah commands us to change and replace this system. Islam is jihad. Islam is a social system. Islam is a political system..” “if you're not with them, you're against them. And if you're against them, you know the rest” This is horrifying

Wall Street Apes

1,096,257 次观看 • 1 年前

This hospital would not allow a woman's two support system people to be in the labor and delivery room with the pregnant mother-to-be. The hospital staff claims it was the doctor's decision, and they are not getting any other answers. What could be the reason for this, and does the doctor and hospital have that right? I've never heard of this happening, but I guess it does. Doesn’t seem right to me.
1:13

This hospital would not allow a woman's two support system people to be in the labor and delivery room with the pregnant mother-to-be. The hospital staff claims it was the doctor's decision, and they are not getting any other answers. What could be the reason for this, and does the doctor and hospital have that right? I've never heard of this happening, but I guess it does. Doesn’t seem right to me.

Suzee Q

21,085 次观看 • 4 个月前