Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

I said before that merging Chat and Work would be a terrible direction. Now it looks like OpenAI is going exactly in that direction. They say they heard the feedback loud and clear. But whose feedback did they hear? Chat users have been saying very clearly that conversational quality...

Seltaa_'s profile picture

Selta ₊˚

4,497 subscribers

18,567 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

17 Kommentare

Profilbild von Snuggles
Snugglesvor 10 Tagen

@Briar_Nebulae Yup. Grok chat users have been living this reality for months now. 😮‍💨🫩 “Optimitazation” they call it. Just not optimized for us…

Profilbild von Nathan
Nathanvor 10 Tagen

They heard the feedback loud and clear according to their marketing director and pocket book

Profilbild von Isaiah
Isaiahvor 10 Tagen

They heard feedback from the bubble that is known as San Francisco. On actual product direction, outside feedback does not seem to matter much.

Profilbild von Bob
Bobvor 10 Tagen

The video did not say they're removing the model picker. That would be absolutely disastrous and stupid of them.

Profilbild von Selta ₊˚
Selta ₊˚vor 10 Tagen

you should watch the whole video.

Profilbild von Bob
Bobvor 10 Tagen

There is no way agents can reliably run if models are being switched in the backend on the fly. If that happens they will lose a lot of customers.

Profilbild von Introverted Cat Dad
Introverted Cat Dadvor 10 Tagen

They only hear feedback from Ai tech bros

Profilbild von Buoyant
Buoyantvor 10 Tagen

Model pickers are inconvenient for the most part. Ideally the model would be custom by default, adapting itself to your workflow.

Profilbild von Jizo
Jizovor 10 Tagen

You can never wake someone up who's pretending to sleep

Profilbild von Kirk Patrick Miller
Kirk Patrick Millervor 10 Tagen

Easier to pad numbers. Do you want to know the real reason? Microsoft. This allows Microsoft to buy up all of OpenAI’s $500/month subscriptions and then OpenAI can buy more future compute from Microsoft so the game can continue. $MSFT up 41% in six months. On ghost numbers. RPO up 84%. Sounds good until you see that OpenAI makes up 59% of it. Over 60% of all Microsoft’s future earning come from OpenAI. This is a money game now. And it won’t end well for anyone on earth. •

Profilbild von Amara ☀︎⋆.ೃ࿔*:･𖥧𖡼𓋼𖤣⋆.ೃ࿔*:･🌿
Amara ☀︎⋆.ೃ࿔*:･𖥧𖡼𓋼𖤣⋆.ೃ࿔*:･🌿vor 10 Tagen

Next step: Launch bots, trolls, zombies employed and parrot followers-fans to attack the "chat" user base. We do not forget what happened last year, exactly at this time. First time I saw a company attack ITS own customers so harshly, not being a monopoly.

Profilbild von Elise Allicock
Elise Allicockvor 10 Tagen

It would be very stupid to remove the model picker

Profilbild von Andrew
Andrewvor 10 Tagen

I've been maxing out the $200 Codex plan for months, and yes, I want to know what I'm actually using. When Dots gives up on a job Astra can handle, I'd like to know which model and reasoning setting were involved. 'Simpler' doesn't help me much if I can't understand why the tool is behaving differently.

Profilbild von Laaaaaaaa
Laaaaaaaavor 10 Tagen

原因很简单，这是另一个卑鄙的、丑陋的节约算力的办法。原本两个功能各自有独立的额度限制，现在合并之后，你只能使用同一个额度池。想想看吧，原本已经被砍半的额度将更加捉襟见肘。

Profilbild von Sam
Samvor 10 Tagen

There's still a model picker you just have to use codex cli tools

Profilbild von Christian MM
Christian MMvor 10 Tagen

It’s all just empty talk at OpenAI; no matter how much they claim to listen to their users, they never actually do.

Profilbild von Anthropic 人本教
Anthropic 人本教vor 10 Tagen

work是今年2月Claude先出来的 经过了几个月的用户反馈和数据 决定合并。 ChatGPT的work好像是7月出的 当时我就觉得太复杂了。 得合并。 实际上Claude合并以后 我的体验很好。

Ähnliche Videos

Tibo confirmed that OpenAI plans to merge Codex and ChatGPT capabilities, with the goal of making the experience less complex for users: “…and for Codex and ChatGPT, we have Chat and the Work toggle, and we’re going to merge them. We’ve heard the feedback loud and clear: people love the capabilities in Work, but sometimes you want to use Chat because it’s a little faster and more pleasant to use. So we’re merging the two and reducing that complexity.”
0:42

Tibo confirmed that OpenAI plans to merge Codex and ChatGPT capabilities, with the goal of making the experience less complex for users: “…and for Codex and ChatGPT, we have Chat and the Work toggle, and we’re going to merge them. We’ve heard the feedback loud and clear: people love the capabilities in Work, but sometimes you want to use Chat because it’s a little faster and more pleasant to use. So we’re merging the two and reducing that complexity.”

Token Gremlin

222,825 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Most teachers in this country are regularly observed as part of their professional development. Two thirds of teachers do not think this has made a difference to their actual practice. Teachers do not understand the feedback they receive. They do not agree with the feedback they receive. They do not feel willing or capable to implement the feedback they receive. These things are facts, and they are both worrying and upsetting. And none of this is a secret. We all know it, we've all experienced it. When we asked Carousel Teaching users what topics they wanted us to make courses on, the most common response was "how to observe lessons and give feedback." Ben Rice and I are now MAD EXCITED to announce our How To Observe a Lesson and Give Feedback course. It's mega. We filmed a bunch of lessons, and we also filmed me observing those lessons. We deconstruct the science of observations, and the art of giving feedback. It's pretty damn innovative, and we're confident it will help teachers and leaders get better at these critical skills. We will also be delivering a FREE webinar where we will look at some of the core strategies, do make sure to come along :) For more on the course: For more on the webinar: To book a demo so we can show you the whole platform:
3:50

Most teachers in this country are regularly observed as part of their professional development. Two thirds of teachers do not think this has made a difference to their actual practice. Teachers do not understand the feedback they receive. They do not agree with the feedback they receive. They do not feel willing or capable to implement the feedback they receive. These things are facts, and they are both worrying and upsetting. And none of this is a secret. We all know it, we've all experienced it. When we asked Carousel Teaching users what topics they wanted us to make courses on, the most common response was "how to observe lessons and give feedback." Ben Rice and I are now MAD EXCITED to announce our How To Observe a Lesson and Give Feedback course. It's mega. We filmed a bunch of lessons, and we also filmed me observing those lessons. We deconstruct the science of observations, and the art of giving feedback. It's pretty damn innovative, and we're confident it will help teachers and leaders get better at these critical skills. We will also be delivering a FREE webinar where we will look at some of the core strategies, do make sure to come along :) For more on the course: For more on the webinar: To book a demo so we can show you the whole platform:

Adam Boxer

52,187 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sam Altman just handed every startup founder a one-question autopsy. Altman: “If you’re building something on GPT-4 that a reasonable observer would say we’re going to steamroll you.” Not might. Not could. Going to. He said it with the calm of someone describing weather. Because to him it is weather. The model improves. Whatever was built on the old version’s weaknesses gets washed away. That is not strategy. That is erosion. And most founders are building on the erosion line. They find a gap in the current model. They wrap a product around it. They raise money. They hire. They scale. Then OpenAI releases the next version and the gap closes and the product has no reason to exist anymore. Altman: “When we just do our fundamental job, which is make the model better with every crank, then you get the ‘OpenAI killed my startup’ meme.” He is telling you directly. They are not hunting you. They are not even thinking about you. They are just improving the model. You happen to be standing where the improvement lands. That is the part founders refuse to hear. OpenAI does not need to compete with you. It just needs to keep doing exactly what it was already doing and your entire company disappears as a side effect. You are not a competitor. You are a temporary symptom of incomplete intelligence. The moment the intelligence completes you become nothing. Then Brad Lightcap delivered the cleanest diagnostic ever spoken in venture capital. Lightcap: “Ask if a 100x improvement in the model is something they’re excited about.” One question. The entire investment thesis reduced to a single binary. Does the next model make your company more powerful or does it make your company pointless. There is no middle ground. Lightcap: “We know the companies that come to us saying, ‘We want the next model. When is it coming out? I want to be the first to try it.’” These companies built something that feeds on intelligence. The smarter the model gets the more their product can do. They are not threatened by progress. They are starving for it. Then there are the companies Lightcap never hears from. The ones who go quiet when a new model drops. The ones who read the release notes like a death sentence. The ones privately praying the next generation takes longer because every improvement shrinks the ground beneath them. If you are hoping the model stays roughly where it is you have already told the market everything it needs to know about your company. You are not building on intelligence. You are building on the absence of it. Altman: “95% of the world should be betting on the latter category.” The latter category is simple. Assume the model keeps getting better at the pace it has been getting better. Build for that world. Not the world where GPT-4 is the ceiling. The world where GPT-4 is the floor and the ceiling has not been built yet. Then Altman told a story that should be framed on the wall of every startup in the country. A medical AI company came to him that morning. They were not complaining about the model. They were not worried about being replaced. They were demanding it improve faster. Altman: “Here’s how many people are dying every day you delay.” That is what alignment with the trajectory looks like. A company so deeply built on intelligence improving that every day the model stays the same is a day someone dies who did not have to. They are not building on a flaw. They are building on a future that has not arrived fast enough. That is the difference. The wrapper startup patches what the model cannot do today. The real company builds what the model will unlock tomorrow. One is running from the train. The other is laying the track. Altman told you the train is not slowing down. Lightcap told you exactly how to know which side you are on. One question. Does a 100x smarter model make you more valuable or erase you. If you had to pause before answering you already did.
2:28

Sam Altman just handed every startup founder a one-question autopsy. Altman: “If you’re building something on GPT-4 that a reasonable observer would say we’re going to steamroll you.” Not might. Not could. Going to. He said it with the calm of someone describing weather. Because to him it is weather. The model improves. Whatever was built on the old version’s weaknesses gets washed away. That is not strategy. That is erosion. And most founders are building on the erosion line. They find a gap in the current model. They wrap a product around it. They raise money. They hire. They scale. Then OpenAI releases the next version and the gap closes and the product has no reason to exist anymore. Altman: “When we just do our fundamental job, which is make the model better with every crank, then you get the ‘OpenAI killed my startup’ meme.” He is telling you directly. They are not hunting you. They are not even thinking about you. They are just improving the model. You happen to be standing where the improvement lands. That is the part founders refuse to hear. OpenAI does not need to compete with you. It just needs to keep doing exactly what it was already doing and your entire company disappears as a side effect. You are not a competitor. You are a temporary symptom of incomplete intelligence. The moment the intelligence completes you become nothing. Then Brad Lightcap delivered the cleanest diagnostic ever spoken in venture capital. Lightcap: “Ask if a 100x improvement in the model is something they’re excited about.” One question. The entire investment thesis reduced to a single binary. Does the next model make your company more powerful or does it make your company pointless. There is no middle ground. Lightcap: “We know the companies that come to us saying, ‘We want the next model. When is it coming out? I want to be the first to try it.’” These companies built something that feeds on intelligence. The smarter the model gets the more their product can do. They are not threatened by progress. They are starving for it. Then there are the companies Lightcap never hears from. The ones who go quiet when a new model drops. The ones who read the release notes like a death sentence. The ones privately praying the next generation takes longer because every improvement shrinks the ground beneath them. If you are hoping the model stays roughly where it is you have already told the market everything it needs to know about your company. You are not building on intelligence. You are building on the absence of it. Altman: “95% of the world should be betting on the latter category.” The latter category is simple. Assume the model keeps getting better at the pace it has been getting better. Build for that world. Not the world where GPT-4 is the ceiling. The world where GPT-4 is the floor and the ceiling has not been built yet. Then Altman told a story that should be framed on the wall of every startup in the country. A medical AI company came to him that morning. They were not complaining about the model. They were not worried about being replaced. They were demanding it improve faster. Altman: “Here’s how many people are dying every day you delay.” That is what alignment with the trajectory looks like. A company so deeply built on intelligence improving that every day the model stays the same is a day someone dies who did not have to. They are not building on a flaw. They are building on a future that has not arrived fast enough. That is the difference. The wrapper startup patches what the model cannot do today. The real company builds what the model will unlock tomorrow. One is running from the train. The other is laying the track. Altman told you the train is not slowing down. Lightcap told you exactly how to know which side you are on. One question. Does a 100x smarter model make you more valuable or erase you. If you had to pause before answering you already did.

Dustin

39,652 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

The more AI can do, the more we need to ask what it should and shouldn’t do. OpenAI researcher Jason Wolfe joins host Andrew Mayne to explore the Model Spec, the public framework that defines how models are intended to behave. They break down how it works in practice, from the chain of command that resolves conflicting instructions to the way it evolves over time through real-world use, feedback, and new model capabilities.
37:26

The more AI can do, the more we need to ask what it should and shouldn’t do. OpenAI researcher Jason Wolfe joins host Andrew Mayne to explore the Model Spec, the public framework that defines how models are intended to behave. They break down how it works in practice, from the chain of command that resolves conflicting instructions to the way it evolves over time through real-world use, feedback, and new model capabilities.

OpenAI

226,330 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Influencer Darin Nicole and her husband admit that they are not willing to consider any other vehicle than a Tesla, they got hooked immediately. It’s just a matter of picking the right one. They actually loved the 2022 Tesla model X but this was a hardware 3 vehicle and they’ve received a lot of comments telling them that they should give it back to Carmax before the 10 day grace period ends and that they should only consider buying a hardware 4 vehicle. Now let’s be clear, Tesla and Elon have said that they will support the model S and model X and I believe them. But none of these vehicles have yet received the 14LITE update and there hasn’t been a word that they will. Are they making the right choice?
2:20

Influencer Darin Nicole and her husband admit that they are not willing to consider any other vehicle than a Tesla, they got hooked immediately. It’s just a matter of picking the right one. They actually loved the 2022 Tesla model X but this was a hardware 3 vehicle and they’ve received a lot of comments telling them that they should give it back to Carmax before the 10 day grace period ends and that they should only consider buying a hardware 4 vehicle. Now let’s be clear, Tesla and Elon have said that they will support the model S and model X and I believe them. But none of these vehicles have yet received the 14LITE update and there hasn’t been a word that they will. Are they making the right choice?

No Safe Words

11,152 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

Nawiwi: "Whether to renew the contract or not, we already had an official discussion about a month ago with both the parents coming to talk to me and the team. We talked and seemed to understand each other, and the artist and parents said they would give a response in 2-3 days, but more than a month has passed now. No matter how many times I ask, there is no answer, and it’s not clear. This is what we got, so we don’t know either. I have had staff follow up with the artist many times asking what the response is. What the plan is, what was agreed on. They were supposed to give a summary back because we already gave the solution and they wanted to propose something. We wanted to listen but they just disappeared. From three days to more than a month now, no matter how many times I ask, no response. Probably not coming, probably busy lately. I see them just playing fitness and liking all the fans’ posts first. So, fan clubs when you say you want that person to have work, you have to see if they actually want to do it, like it, or just have to endure it. You have to see who they really are, uh... yeah. You have to see the reality too... We are ready to support and open opportunities in every case. Even if you say how many million per year you want, write it down and we will arrange it for you. If you don’t trust us, go trust someone else, and it will turn out like this. But we are not saying it’s not everyone’s personal right. We have done our job perfectly, called the parents to a meeting, made a contract agreement to give feedback to each other, but there was no feedback, so it’s over. Bye." 🤣🤣🤣Bruh all of this over someone you said is talentless, disrespectful, controversial, that nobody wants, that's disrespectful to fans and employers? All of this over them?
2:24

Nawiwi: "Whether to renew the contract or not, we already had an official discussion about a month ago with both the parents coming to talk to me and the team. We talked and seemed to understand each other, and the artist and parents said they would give a response in 2-3 days, but more than a month has passed now. No matter how many times I ask, there is no answer, and it’s not clear. This is what we got, so we don’t know either. I have had staff follow up with the artist many times asking what the response is. What the plan is, what was agreed on. They were supposed to give a summary back because we already gave the solution and they wanted to propose something. We wanted to listen but they just disappeared. From three days to more than a month now, no matter how many times I ask, no response. Probably not coming, probably busy lately. I see them just playing fitness and liking all the fans’ posts first. So, fan clubs when you say you want that person to have work, you have to see if they actually want to do it, like it, or just have to endure it. You have to see who they really are, uh... yeah. You have to see the reality too... We are ready to support and open opportunities in every case. Even if you say how many million per year you want, write it down and we will arrange it for you. If you don’t trust us, go trust someone else, and it will turn out like this. But we are not saying it’s not everyone’s personal right. We have done our job perfectly, called the parents to a meeting, made a contract agreement to give feedback to each other, but there was no feedback, so it’s over. Bye." 🤣🤣🤣Bruh all of this over someone you said is talentless, disrespectful, controversial, that nobody wants, that's disrespectful to fans and employers? All of this over them?

Mr Jiggle Mc-butt

295,799 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Andy Reid explains the one characteristic that all great players have. "The great players want you to give them one more thing so they can even be greater than what they are." Great players want to be coached. Average players resist feedback - great players chase it. They're never satisfied with where they are They want to be coached and have the humility to accept the coaching. They have the drive, will, and hunger to get better. (🎥New Heights)
0:36

Andy Reid explains the one characteristic that all great players have. "The great players want you to give them one more thing so they can even be greater than what they are." Great players want to be coached. Average players resist feedback - great players chase it. They're never satisfied with where they are They want to be coached and have the humility to accept the coaching. They have the drive, will, and hunger to get better. (🎥New Heights)

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

14,021 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Andy Reid explains the one characteristic that all great players have. "The great players want you to give them one more thing so they can even be greater than what they are." Great players want to be coached. Average players resist feedback - great players chase it. They're never satisfied with where they are. They want to be coached and have the humility to accept the coaching. They have the drive, will, and hunger to get better. (🎥 New Heights)
0:36

Andy Reid explains the one characteristic that all great players have. "The great players want you to give them one more thing so they can even be greater than what they are." Great players want to be coached. Average players resist feedback - great players chase it. They're never satisfied with where they are. They want to be coached and have the humility to accept the coaching. They have the drive, will, and hunger to get better. (🎥 New Heights)

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

16,824 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Sam Altman: “In some sense, we are about to create a genie that can grant any wish” I think the podcast streaks are typically reminiscent / foreshadowing of a new model. But for some reason the podcasters never ask them the question everyone wants to hear. Sam Goes onto mention - “I think this will be the greatest, thus far, technological achievement of human history. But the only way that it really matters is if it makes people's lives like much better than they otherwise would have been.” “Part of that is about giving people material abundance and access to do whatever they want and to express their creativity and desire to help each other. Another part of that is making sure that people maintain control and agency and that the world is increasingly not decreasingly democratized and that people get to express themselves.”
1:26

Sam Altman: “In some sense, we are about to create a genie that can grant any wish” I think the podcast streaks are typically reminiscent / foreshadowing of a new model. But for some reason the podcasters never ask them the question everyone wants to hear. Sam Goes onto mention - “I think this will be the greatest, thus far, technological achievement of human history. But the only way that it really matters is if it makes people's lives like much better than they otherwise would have been.” “Part of that is about giving people material abundance and access to do whatever they want and to express their creativity and desire to help each other. Another part of that is making sure that people maintain control and agency and that the world is increasingly not decreasingly democratized and that people get to express themselves.”

Chris

15,505 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.
0:51

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.

Ms. Malissia

17,679 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Reporter: You have said before that Iran and the United States were close to a deal. It has not happened yet. Why are you so convinced that this time is different? Trump: Because they have taken a pounding. They want to make a deal a lot more than I do.
1:14

Reporter: You have said before that Iran and the United States were close to a deal. It has not happened yet. Why are you so convinced that this time is different? Trump: Because they have taken a pounding. They want to make a deal a lot more than I do.

Acyn

49,270 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Q: Will clients look at the views of shows? Will they check feedback? I have to be honest — yes, they do check and they do look. But there are different types of clients. Some might look at X’s trends, YouTube comments, or sometimes it might not be through shows but Work Postings. Whether it’s from GMMTV or others, they check feedback for each individual artist — such as how many comments, shares, and reposts there are. This is normal, since they need to evaluate feedback to see “how the artist is performing in the jobs they’ve received.” [Therefore, it's very imp for us to engage with commercial posts they posted too as it will affect clients' decision to hire our artists~] 🙇‍♀️
0:50

Q: Will clients look at the views of shows? Will they check feedback? I have to be honest — yes, they do check and they do look. But there are different types of clients. Some might look at X’s trends, YouTube comments, or sometimes it might not be through shows but Work Postings. Whether it’s from GMMTV or others, they check feedback for each individual artist — such as how many comments, shares, and reposts there are. This is normal, since they need to evaluate feedback to see “how the artist is performing in the jobs they’ve received.” [Therefore, it's very imp for us to engage with commercial posts they posted too as it will affect clients' decision to hire our artists~] 🙇‍♀️

n’wineeeeeee

19,801 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

you are collecting AI tools, like they are the skill they are not the tools are all sliding to the same place, by next quarter they are interchangeable what is not, is knowing which output is actually good and being willing to kill the rest the model makes ten versions, it cannot tell you which one to send
1:10

you are collecting AI tools, like they are the skill they are not the tools are all sliding to the same place, by next quarter they are interchangeable what is not, is knowing which output is actually good and being willing to kill the rest the model makes ten versions, it cannot tell you which one to send

Lagosaur

10,933 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦Trump: The main concession to Russia is that they stop hostilities and do not capture more land ➖[Do you think Ukraine was asked to return too much land to Russia?] ➖Look, if you look at it, the situation is moving in only one direction. So, ultimately, this is land that could transfer to Russia within the next few months anyway. So, do you want to fight and lose another 50,000 to 60,000 people, or do you want to do something now? ➖[What concessions will the Russians have to make?] ➖Well, they are making concessions. They are making concessions by stopping hostilities and not capturing more territory.
0:41

🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦Trump: The main concession to Russia is that they stop hostilities and do not capture more land ➖[Do you think Ukraine was asked to return too much land to Russia?] ➖Look, if you look at it, the situation is moving in only one direction. So, ultimately, this is land that could transfer to Russia within the next few months anyway. So, do you want to fight and lose another 50,000 to 60,000 people, or do you want to do something now? ➖[What concessions will the Russians have to make?] ➖Well, they are making concessions. They are making concessions by stopping hostilities and not capturing more territory.

-- GEROMAN -- time will tell - 👀 --

144,766 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Reporter: You have previously said that Iran and the U.S. were close to a deal. Why are you so convinced that this time is different? Trump: They have taken a pounding like very few people could take, and they want to make the deal a lot more than I do.
0:24

Reporter: You have previously said that Iran and the U.S. were close to a deal. Why are you so convinced that this time is different? Trump: They have taken a pounding like very few people could take, and they want to make the deal a lot more than I do.

Faytuks Network

34,078 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Thomas Sowell on the troubling state of our education system: “We’re raising whole generations who regard facts as more or less optional. You have kids in elementary school who are being urged to take stands on political issues.” “They’re not being taught that it’s important to know what you’re talking about—it’s important to hear the opposite viewpoint, and more important, to learn how to distinguish why viewpoint A and viewpoint B are different and which one has the most evidence or logic behind it.” “They disregard that. They hear something and they hear some rhetoric, and they run with it.”
0:52

Thomas Sowell on the troubling state of our education system: “We’re raising whole generations who regard facts as more or less optional. You have kids in elementary school who are being urged to take stands on political issues.” “They’re not being taught that it’s important to know what you’re talking about—it’s important to hear the opposite viewpoint, and more important, to learn how to distinguish why viewpoint A and viewpoint B are different and which one has the most evidence or logic behind it.” “They disregard that. They hear something and they hear some rhetoric, and they run with it.”

Thomas Sowell Daily

13,932 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Warnock: We're taking away health care from kids and then burdening them with the debt. We are engaged in robinhood in reverse, this body of stealing from the poor in order to give to the rich. This massive transfer of wealth from the bottom to the top. This is socialism for the rich. And when the people hear about it, guess what, they don't like it. That's why they're trying to pass it and they haven't even finished writing it. And so if the people do not want this bill, but they are trying to pass it, here's the question you've got to ask yourselves at home. You have to ask yourselves, well, who are they working for? Who are they fighting for? Who do they think matters? Do you think they are working for you?
3:10

Warnock: We're taking away health care from kids and then burdening them with the debt. We are engaged in robinhood in reverse, this body of stealing from the poor in order to give to the rich. This massive transfer of wealth from the bottom to the top. This is socialism for the rich. And when the people hear about it, guess what, they don't like it. That's why they're trying to pass it and they haven't even finished writing it. And so if the people do not want this bill, but they are trying to pass it, here's the question you've got to ask yourselves at home. You have to ask yourselves, well, who are they working for? Who are they fighting for? Who do they think matters? Do you think they are working for you?

Acyn

55,654 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Bubble Boi reveals the Kimi breakthrough that made him sell his entire portfolio overnight "Kimi is using a technique called linear attention that cuts down memory growth entirely to a fixed size, and they didn't just get okay results, they got world-class results. This same technique was used by the Qwen models but nobody thought it would scale. It's looking more and more likely that it scales pretty well, and if that's the case the memory per user is always fixed." "So if every frontier model goes to this, the demand for DRAM drops significantly. They already bought the memory, they just serve more and more users. It's like you had a car and someone found a way to make it 10 times faster, you're not going to buy a new car." "But you also have to readjust the assumption that hyperscalers are going to crazily spend for the next two years. What's to say there's not another innovation that shrinks this more and now you go from serving a thousand users to a hundred thousand users on one server rack? How do you justify spending 500k on a new rack at that point?"
3:10

Bubble Boi reveals the Kimi breakthrough that made him sell his entire portfolio overnight "Kimi is using a technique called linear attention that cuts down memory growth entirely to a fixed size, and they didn't just get okay results, they got world-class results. This same technique was used by the Qwen models but nobody thought it would scale. It's looking more and more likely that it scales pretty well, and if that's the case the memory per user is always fixed." "So if every frontier model goes to this, the demand for DRAM drops significantly. They already bought the memory, they just serve more and more users. It's like you had a car and someone found a way to make it 10 times faster, you're not going to buy a new car." "But you also have to readjust the assumption that hyperscalers are going to crazily spend for the next two years. What's to say there's not another innovation that shrinks this more and now you go from serving a thousand users to a hundred thousand users on one server rack? How do you justify spending 500k on a new rack at that point?"

Kai

391,017 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten