Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

ID Software's (still employed) Lead Services Programmer had some SCATHING criticisms of #Xbox following the gutting of their studio. He says: +Impossible to make a AAA game of previous Doom standards with current employees. +Entire important departments and disciplines at studio gone. +Reassurances they're the same are a lie;...

nib95_'s profile picture

NIB

7,946 subscribers

83,066 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Gaming#Xbox
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

To all the Dense & Uneducated Pretendo fans complaining about #NintendoSwitch2 Game KeyCards: - Game KeyCards require a ONE time download - Game KeyCards are NOT tied to an account - Game KeyCards are NOT tied to the eShop - Game KeyCards function exactly like regular game cards - Switch 2 has only TWO card options available(For now) to Devs - 64GB Regular card & Game KeyCard - NS2 Cards are more advanced tech and more expensive to make than NS1 Cards - Game KeyCards reduce development time as 3rd Parties do not have to include Card production - Game KeyCards gives NS2 FULL content, Feature, and Visual parity for 3rd party games since Devs do not have to downgrade/Strip a game to fit on a 64GB Card. Large games & high-quality assets are very difficult to fit on a 64GB game card - Game KeyCards insures game pricing parity with other consoles. Otherwise, the production cost will be passed on to you in the form of a higher price for the same game on other consoles. Unless 3rd party is confident the production cost will be offset by High sales of the 64GB game card -Without the invention of Game KeyCards you would see digital only 3rd party games or, Most Likely, 3rd party games not released on Switch 2 at all - NS2 game cards & Game Keycards will balance out as production costs drop over time, and Nintendo will be able to make higher capacity Game Cards - Nintendo invented Game KeyCards as a roadblock to stop the push for a digital only games industry - Anything you can do with a NS2 Physical game card, you can do with a Game KeyCard So please STFU with the lies, misinformation, and delusional BS. ENJOY the best & equal 3rd party support on Nintendo console in DECADES, and let this situation play out like it's supposed to 🫶🏽
0:29

To all the Dense & Uneducated Pretendo fans complaining about #NintendoSwitch2 Game KeyCards: - Game KeyCards require a ONE time download - Game KeyCards are NOT tied to an account - Game KeyCards are NOT tied to the eShop - Game KeyCards function exactly like regular game cards - Switch 2 has only TWO card options available(For now) to Devs - 64GB Regular card & Game KeyCard - NS2 Cards are more advanced tech and more expensive to make than NS1 Cards - Game KeyCards reduce development time as 3rd Parties do not have to include Card production - Game KeyCards gives NS2 FULL content, Feature, and Visual parity for 3rd party games since Devs do not have to downgrade/Strip a game to fit on a 64GB Card. Large games & high-quality assets are very difficult to fit on a 64GB game card - Game KeyCards insures game pricing parity with other consoles. Otherwise, the production cost will be passed on to you in the form of a higher price for the same game on other consoles. Unless 3rd party is confident the production cost will be offset by High sales of the 64GB game card -Without the invention of Game KeyCards you would see digital only 3rd party games or, Most Likely, 3rd party games not released on Switch 2 at all - NS2 game cards & Game Keycards will balance out as production costs drop over time, and Nintendo will be able to make higher capacity Game Cards - Nintendo invented Game KeyCards as a roadblock to stop the push for a digital only games industry - Anything you can do with a NS2 Physical game card, you can do with a Game KeyCard So please STFU with the lies, misinformation, and delusional BS. ENJOY the best & equal 3rd party support on Nintendo console in DECADES, and let this situation play out like it's supposed to 🫶🏽

NintenGOD

22,008 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Hot Take: it doesn't matter if a CEO is a gamer. As Strauss Zelnick has said perfectly "a CEO's job is to attract, retain and motivate the best talent in the business and then get out of their way." The new Xbox CEO, Asha Sharma doesn't need to be a gamer to run a company. She simply needs to do what the CEO's job of running a gaming company is supposed to do which is to hire talent and allow game studios to make their creative vision come to reality in a video-game format without interference. I've seen a lot of comments judging her by her previous gamer background which doesn't really matter in my opinion, what matters is how and if her future decisions will lead to making Xbox the best gaming platform that it can be.
0:40

Hot Take: it doesn't matter if a CEO is a gamer. As Strauss Zelnick has said perfectly "a CEO's job is to attract, retain and motivate the best talent in the business and then get out of their way." The new Xbox CEO, Asha Sharma doesn't need to be a gamer to run a company. She simply needs to do what the CEO's job of running a gaming company is supposed to do which is to hire talent and allow game studios to make their creative vision come to reality in a video-game format without interference. I've seen a lot of comments judging her by her previous gamer background which doesn't really matter in my opinion, what matters is how and if her future decisions will lead to making Xbox the best gaming platform that it can be.

NikTek

155,324 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Digital Foundry on #Xbox Project Helix: “It is the end of a fully focused console environment for Xbox” "From a developer perspective, Xbox is a PC" "Probably just going to be running those PC games" "Perhaps one that receives a limited level of specific optimisations but basically runs the exact same code as the PC build. "Project Helix will present as a console, but it will be running Windows - think a more tightly defined version of the ROG Xbox Ally X front-end." "They're developing for Windows at this point." "Not have people make bespoke Xbox versions anymore" "Will [Series X] get a disgraced ending?" "We may actually see Series X get like a thown to the dustbin of history kind of feeling at the end of it." "Series S has meant a lot of development effort for a lot of studios, so if it gets dropped I wouldn't be so sad, but I'm just very curious what it means for the future development of Xbox games during the cross-gen period" "The feedback we get all the time is memory management [on Series S] has been very very challenging"
5:12

Digital Foundry on #Xbox Project Helix: “It is the end of a fully focused console environment for Xbox” "From a developer perspective, Xbox is a PC" "Probably just going to be running those PC games" "Perhaps one that receives a limited level of specific optimisations but basically runs the exact same code as the PC build. "Project Helix will present as a console, but it will be running Windows - think a more tightly defined version of the ROG Xbox Ally X front-end." "They're developing for Windows at this point." "Not have people make bespoke Xbox versions anymore" "Will [Series X] get a disgraced ending?" "We may actually see Series X get like a thown to the dustbin of history kind of feeling at the end of it." "Series S has meant a lot of development effort for a lot of studios, so if it gets dropped I wouldn't be so sad, but I'm just very curious what it means for the future development of Xbox games during the cross-gen period" "The feedback we get all the time is memory management [on Series S] has been very very challenging"

NIB

38,516 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Arteta says Football has evolved and unless they change rules it won't change: 🗣️ “I was really upset the way we (Arsenal) conceded a goal against Chelsea. And Chelsea, look, the quality that they have, the amount of set-piece they scored. “Manchester United, they're doing so well. The same, I was at Man City, used to work a lot on them. So it's something. “There are phases, and there are moments when a team has an opportunity to do certain things and the game is evolving, and the game is becoming more and more difficult. “Before, when you used to do a game plan and you just invert a full-back and bring an extra player in midfield or a false nine, opponents are finished. Big overload. 4v3 inside, 2v1 inside, time on the ball. So dominant 78% of possession, the other opponent two counterattacks, set pieces, the game is done now. “Teams are adapting, teams know, after every sequence of play, whether it's a throw-in, a restart of play, an open-page situation, after direct play, exactly what they have to do. “And everything is almost man-to-man. So it's going to be a different game unless we change the rules, because the evolution of the game is that.”
1:32

Arteta says Football has evolved and unless they change rules it won't change: 🗣️ “I was really upset the way we (Arsenal) conceded a goal against Chelsea. And Chelsea, look, the quality that they have, the amount of set-piece they scored. “Manchester United, they're doing so well. The same, I was at Man City, used to work a lot on them. So it's something. “There are phases, and there are moments when a team has an opportunity to do certain things and the game is evolving, and the game is becoming more and more difficult. “Before, when you used to do a game plan and you just invert a full-back and bring an extra player in midfield or a false nine, opponents are finished. Big overload. 4v3 inside, 2v1 inside, time on the ball. So dominant 78% of possession, the other opponent two counterattacks, set pieces, the game is done now. “Teams are adapting, teams know, after every sequence of play, whether it's a throw-in, a restart of play, an open-page situation, after direct play, exactly what they have to do. “And everything is almost man-to-man. So it's going to be a different game unless we change the rules, because the evolution of the game is that.”

Connor Humm

1,120,465 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Gavin Baker says AI will make video games 90% cheaper to make "In the short term, AI is going to be amazing for the video game platforms. I think AI's impact on video games has been very misunderstood. AI world models are going to lower the cost of developing a game by 90%." "If it used to cost $300 million to make a AAA title like Call of Duty, or $200 million or $100 million or whatever the number is, it goes down 90%." "This might end up being really bad for companies that make video games, because you're going to have a lot more competition. But if you were a video game platform, and we all know what those platforms are, this is going to be really good for you, because there's going to be an explosion of content."
1:07

Gavin Baker says AI will make video games 90% cheaper to make "In the short term, AI is going to be amazing for the video game platforms. I think AI's impact on video games has been very misunderstood. AI world models are going to lower the cost of developing a game by 90%." "If it used to cost $300 million to make a AAA title like Call of Duty, or $200 million or $100 million or whatever the number is, it goes down 90%." "This might end up being really bad for companies that make video games, because you're going to have a lot more competition. But if you were a video game platform, and we all know what those platforms are, this is going to be really good for you, because there's going to be an explosion of content."

dnap

218,282 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Assassin's Creed Origins is the only game that came close to accurately and authentically portraying the North African civilisation. It's literally, I think, the only AAA game based on African history, which is crazy and sad to think about. That being said, I do want more Ancient Egypt AAA games (as long as they're not whitewashed), alongside AAA games based in West or East Africa. A game based on the Songhai Empire during their expansion would go crazy, or I would settle for a game around the Aksumite invasion of Himyar. Honestly, anything African that is fantasy, fun, cinematic, and story-driven like Ghost of Yōtei would be dope to see. Africa's history is literally a treasure trove of lore waiting to be utilized. Now I wouldn't say there's Asian fantasy fatigue. If anything, it would be more accurate to say Japanese fantasy fatigue. Along with medieval European fatigue, too.
1:27

Assassin's Creed Origins is the only game that came close to accurately and authentically portraying the North African civilisation. It's literally, I think, the only AAA game based on African history, which is crazy and sad to think about. That being said, I do want more Ancient Egypt AAA games (as long as they're not whitewashed), alongside AAA games based in West or East Africa. A game based on the Songhai Empire during their expansion would go crazy, or I would settle for a game around the Aksumite invasion of Himyar. Honestly, anything African that is fantasy, fun, cinematic, and story-driven like Ghost of Yōtei would be dope to see. Africa's history is literally a treasure trove of lore waiting to be utilized. Now I wouldn't say there's Asian fantasy fatigue. If anything, it would be more accurate to say Japanese fantasy fatigue. Along with medieval European fatigue, too.

Scion (PanAfroCore)

32,931 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

At the end of the day, as I discussed with Jordan Peterson, there are just two games to be played, one real, one Woke. The real game is called civilization. The false game is called power. A long post/🧵: The real divide between Woke and not Woke is in power. The Woke game is the power game, and it is a parasite on the real game, which is civilization. Here's roughly how Jordan described the foundation of this idea. There are various rules, norms, etc., in the game society ultimately plays, and these create a hierarchy that is based upon competence, mostly organically, obviously imperfectly. If the rules of the game are good enough, the imperfections (natural corruptions) are minor and society thrives. If they are not, you'll have problems. This is the real game of building society, and it ultimately has to favor competence. This game must be called "civilization" because that's not just its goal but it is also what it does. It civilizes us beyond our base instincts and impulses so we can work together productively in a healthy manner that generates prosperity. As Jordan put it, this game is also a reservoir of value, and reservoirs of value create parasites. What are these civilizational parasites? They’re parallel games organized by and around malignant psychopathological modes like Dark Tetrad traits, psychopathy, and Cluster-B disorders: histrionic, borderline, antisocial, and narcissistic. These malignant pathologies render people incompetent except at manipulation, so they cannot rise far in a healthy civilizational hierarchy. What do they do, then, to gain power and status in life in a game they cannot actually play? They define a parasitic parallel game and rope people into playing it. It is parasitic in that it draws off the real game (civilization) and mimics its form so that the hosts (people in society) are less likely to realize it’s there, but it doesn’t build or create of its own. It siphons and tears down. What drives this game is failing to see what makes the civilizational game and the hierarchy it produces legitimate in the first place. This is characteristic of the psychopathologies at its heart. The narcissist imagines the world should be serving himself at the top, but it isn’t. The problem can’t be himself, so it must be that the game is illegitimate. Otherwise, he’d be at the top, but he isn’t. Therefore, the game is corrupt. His histrionic nature makes him a victim of the real game, preying upon emotions like empathy and righteous indignation to recruit followers. Because of his Dark Tetrad alignment, his game is not only illegitimate but toxic. It’s inherently sadistic, cruel to its recruits in the way typical of all cults—alternating punishment and leniency or even love-bombing. It’s dishonest. It’s psychologically broken from reality. It’s also a Machiavellian game, which means it has no interest in moral or ethical behavior but only in power. Thus, this rival game to the game of civilization is the game of power. The parasitic game—that is, the power game—is based on a fundamental failure to understand the legitimacy of the civilizational game or the approximately legitimate hierarchy it produces. This is a result of its narcissism, mostly. The game cannot be legitimate because the psychopath isn’t on top of it, where he sees himself constantly as a projection from his frail ego. It sees power in the real hierarchy, though, which it can perceive and understand, and for which it blames most of its troubles. What this means is that the (Woke) power game develops a critical theory of the existing legitimate civilization game. That’s why Woke means “using critical theory (and activism).” A critical theory exists not to articulate a vision—at least not beyond a Utopia after the cult power game holds power to enforce its power game long enough—but to “criticize those aspects of the existing society we wish to change,” as Max Horkheimer, creator of the Critical Theory, put it. The critical theory of the power game exists to recruit by delegitimizing the civilization game in the minds of some of its players, usually ones who aren’t succeeding as well. It picks at “contradictions,” failures, and imperfections while casting the whole civilization game as corrupt and unjust. It offers itself as the only alternative to civilization game while pulling at the threads of the civilization game that allow people to believe in it. It all proceeds from the Woke failure to understand the legitimacy of the hierarchy of the civilization game as it proceeds from its set of rules. Misunderstanding legitimacy leads it to conclude that all hierarchies are actually based in power, and all power is fundamentally arbitrary. That is, they do not believe all power is illegitimate. They believe power is the only legitimate thing in any hierarchy, but they also believe that power is located in persons like themselves through their narcissism and projection. Think of Voldemort as an icon of this mode of thinking: “there is no good or evil, only power and those too weak to seek it.” Of course, that quintessential Dark Tetrad perspective is what ensures the psychopathological power game will be rigged to make sure the psychopaths are attracted to it and rise to its top. This belief is what we call Woke. The Woke game is the power game, and it is a parasitic competitor to the civilization game. There is no overlap between these two games. To adopt the power game is to abandon the civilization game entirely and, in fact, to become its enemy. But James, you might ask, isn’t there power in civilization? Yes, there is, and necessarily, but it isn’t what defines the civilization game. It’s a byproduct of the game, not the game itself. The civilization game is fundamentally the building out of an organic and dynamic hierarchy based on a set of rules, or what some people call “muh principles,” that will succeed or fail for that civilization in direct proportion to three things. 1) How aligned with the truth are the rules of the civilization game? 2) How aligned with justice are the rules of the civilization game? 3) How willing are the participants of the civilization game to defend their principles and their game, including against socio-parasitical perversion? The more aligned with truth and justice a civilization game is, the more successful it will be, and the more legitimate its hierarchy. The power that results as a byproduct is extremely legitimate in a highly aligned civilization where people haven’t forgotten their charge to defend the game itself, which is what we call responsibility. A civilization game strongly aligned with truth and justice filled with a preponderance of responsible people will produce a thriving, prosperous society. It only works this way every time. Not everyone is responsible, though. Some are also incompetent because of various pathologies (not talking about for other reasons). Those pathological players may, under certain circumstances, create a parasitic side game with themselves on top through a variety of strategies that mimic the values and principles of the real game while distorting them into power plays because their game is power, as discussed above. They will recruit into that game primarily from those who are resentful of the real game for any variety of reasons, and getting recruited into the power game from the civilization game is called “going Woke.”
2:38

At the end of the day, as I discussed with Jordan Peterson, there are just two games to be played, one real, one Woke. The real game is called civilization. The false game is called power. A long post/🧵: The real divide between Woke and not Woke is in power. The Woke game is the power game, and it is a parasite on the real game, which is civilization. Here's roughly how Jordan described the foundation of this idea. There are various rules, norms, etc., in the game society ultimately plays, and these create a hierarchy that is based upon competence, mostly organically, obviously imperfectly. If the rules of the game are good enough, the imperfections (natural corruptions) are minor and society thrives. If they are not, you'll have problems. This is the real game of building society, and it ultimately has to favor competence. This game must be called "civilization" because that's not just its goal but it is also what it does. It civilizes us beyond our base instincts and impulses so we can work together productively in a healthy manner that generates prosperity. As Jordan put it, this game is also a reservoir of value, and reservoirs of value create parasites. What are these civilizational parasites? They’re parallel games organized by and around malignant psychopathological modes like Dark Tetrad traits, psychopathy, and Cluster-B disorders: histrionic, borderline, antisocial, and narcissistic. These malignant pathologies render people incompetent except at manipulation, so they cannot rise far in a healthy civilizational hierarchy. What do they do, then, to gain power and status in life in a game they cannot actually play? They define a parasitic parallel game and rope people into playing it. It is parasitic in that it draws off the real game (civilization) and mimics its form so that the hosts (people in society) are less likely to realize it’s there, but it doesn’t build or create of its own. It siphons and tears down. What drives this game is failing to see what makes the civilizational game and the hierarchy it produces legitimate in the first place. This is characteristic of the psychopathologies at its heart. The narcissist imagines the world should be serving himself at the top, but it isn’t. The problem can’t be himself, so it must be that the game is illegitimate. Otherwise, he’d be at the top, but he isn’t. Therefore, the game is corrupt. His histrionic nature makes him a victim of the real game, preying upon emotions like empathy and righteous indignation to recruit followers. Because of his Dark Tetrad alignment, his game is not only illegitimate but toxic. It’s inherently sadistic, cruel to its recruits in the way typical of all cults—alternating punishment and leniency or even love-bombing. It’s dishonest. It’s psychologically broken from reality. It’s also a Machiavellian game, which means it has no interest in moral or ethical behavior but only in power. Thus, this rival game to the game of civilization is the game of power. The parasitic game—that is, the power game—is based on a fundamental failure to understand the legitimacy of the civilizational game or the approximately legitimate hierarchy it produces. This is a result of its narcissism, mostly. The game cannot be legitimate because the psychopath isn’t on top of it, where he sees himself constantly as a projection from his frail ego. It sees power in the real hierarchy, though, which it can perceive and understand, and for which it blames most of its troubles. What this means is that the (Woke) power game develops a critical theory of the existing legitimate civilization game. That’s why Woke means “using critical theory (and activism).” A critical theory exists not to articulate a vision—at least not beyond a Utopia after the cult power game holds power to enforce its power game long enough—but to “criticize those aspects of the existing society we wish to change,” as Max Horkheimer, creator of the Critical Theory, put it. The critical theory of the power game exists to recruit by delegitimizing the civilization game in the minds of some of its players, usually ones who aren’t succeeding as well. It picks at “contradictions,” failures, and imperfections while casting the whole civilization game as corrupt and unjust. It offers itself as the only alternative to civilization game while pulling at the threads of the civilization game that allow people to believe in it. It all proceeds from the Woke failure to understand the legitimacy of the hierarchy of the civilization game as it proceeds from its set of rules. Misunderstanding legitimacy leads it to conclude that all hierarchies are actually based in power, and all power is fundamentally arbitrary. That is, they do not believe all power is illegitimate. They believe power is the only legitimate thing in any hierarchy, but they also believe that power is located in persons like themselves through their narcissism and projection. Think of Voldemort as an icon of this mode of thinking: “there is no good or evil, only power and those too weak to seek it.” Of course, that quintessential Dark Tetrad perspective is what ensures the psychopathological power game will be rigged to make sure the psychopaths are attracted to it and rise to its top. This belief is what we call Woke. The Woke game is the power game, and it is a parasitic competitor to the civilization game. There is no overlap between these two games. To adopt the power game is to abandon the civilization game entirely and, in fact, to become its enemy. But James, you might ask, isn’t there power in civilization? Yes, there is, and necessarily, but it isn’t what defines the civilization game. It’s a byproduct of the game, not the game itself. The civilization game is fundamentally the building out of an organic and dynamic hierarchy based on a set of rules, or what some people call “muh principles,” that will succeed or fail for that civilization in direct proportion to three things. 1) How aligned with the truth are the rules of the civilization game? 2) How aligned with justice are the rules of the civilization game? 3) How willing are the participants of the civilization game to defend their principles and their game, including against socio-parasitical perversion? The more aligned with truth and justice a civilization game is, the more successful it will be, and the more legitimate its hierarchy. The power that results as a byproduct is extremely legitimate in a highly aligned civilization where people haven’t forgotten their charge to defend the game itself, which is what we call responsibility. A civilization game strongly aligned with truth and justice filled with a preponderance of responsible people will produce a thriving, prosperous society. It only works this way every time. Not everyone is responsible, though. Some are also incompetent because of various pathologies (not talking about for other reasons). Those pathological players may, under certain circumstances, create a parasitic side game with themselves on top through a variety of strategies that mimic the values and principles of the real game while distorting them into power plays because their game is power, as discussed above. They will recruit into that game primarily from those who are resentful of the real game for any variety of reasons, and getting recruited into the power game from the civilization game is called “going Woke.”

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

154,373 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Been discussion on Blessing Adeoye Jr. of Kinda Funny taking issue with #Xbox going to Jez Corden of Windows Central, for new CEO Asha Sharma's interview. Don't think it's "jealousy" contrary to Xbox fandom musings. He listed numerous far more reputable journalists/outlets for the task, with no mention of Kinda Funny. Instead, think it's a matter of credibility and authenticity. Jez's often referred to as an Xbox and Microsoft "shill" with good reason (reasons later). Even by important figures such as Obsidian's co-founder. Xbox going to Jez signals they wanted controlled PR and favoured narratives, not opportunities for hard hitting insight or truth. Inadvertently very revealing. Xbox's moves this last week let us know how Xbox is still operating. +First Asha immediately begins aggressive toxic parasocial antics and "I'm one of you!" PR on social media that Xbox execs are famed for, to evangelise the fandom and have them run positive PR. +She creates a new Gamertag just a month ago with very irregular play, later admits it was a shared account played by others. +Her X responses seem robotic and inorganic. +Xbox have Tom Warren (another Xbox leaning journalist) of The Verge run a hit piece attempting to scapegoat Sarah Bond, which doesn't stand up to scrutiny. +In Satya Nadella's very long statement on the shake ups, Sarah Bond isn't mentioned once. +Asha's first interview is with Jez. +Messaging is a whole load of nothing. Teases things fans want to hear without actually committing to changes. What this all indirectly tells us is it's the same slippery and not so authentic Xbox, and we shouldn't really put much stock into anything they or their execs are currently saying. Only folk who are going to be won over by this controlled PR are the same naive echo chamber Xbox hopefuls who've fallen for or parrot every Xbox narrative/PR, despite countless flip flops, pivots and failings. So why's Jez Corden discredited or seen as an Xbox "shill" by so many? Myriad reasons. This is the same guy who said: +Development on Everwild was going well, gameplay loop was nailed and we'd see it soon, before it was cancelled shortly after. +He wasn't worried about The Initiative or Perfect Dark based on research he'd done, despite layoffs/Crystal Dynamics stuff. Was canned and studio shut shortly after. +Xbox wasn't porting games to PS5, rumour was fanboy hopium, before Xbox announced PS5 ports a few months later. +Implied all Laura Fryer worked on was Xbox One after her critical vid on Xbox, when she'd worked on OG Xbox and 360. +Physical games retail was dead in the UK after unfavourable Xbox sales, when data showed ~40% of sales of the Top 20 games were physical. +Said WuKong never mentioned Series S as a reason for Xbox version delay, implied it was a deal, despite WuKong director pinning blame on Series S. +Xbox might drop prices on games, only to suggest we knew price increases were coming when Xbox increased prices on GP. +No aspect of Halo rumours were true, when Halo moved to UE5 per rumours. +Rumours of Phil's retirement were made up, just months before he retired. +He'd never covered Avowed when called out, when he'd done an article hyping it. +Mischaracterised Tim Stuart's quote on bringing games to more platforms with clarification question to Phil on Game Pass instead of "first party experiences". +Sony's shown "no interest in mobile" when they acquired multiple mobile game studios, been open on mobile expansion and bringing more IP to mobile, set up a mobile gaming division in 2022 and have one of the worlds highest earning mobile games in Fate/Grand Order. +Promoted ABK acquisition and how good it'd be for devs/gamers, when Xbox has suffered 4k+ layoffs since (FAR higher than industry avg in % of total workforce), most in ABK, and GP has seen a 100% price increase in last 2+ years alone. I could go on and on. Point is, so much of the time Jez's running PR, defence and favoured narratives for Xbox, often with misinformation
1:30

Been discussion on Blessing Adeoye Jr. of Kinda Funny taking issue with #Xbox going to Jez Corden of Windows Central, for new CEO Asha Sharma's interview. Don't think it's "jealousy" contrary to Xbox fandom musings. He listed numerous far more reputable journalists/outlets for the task, with no mention of Kinda Funny. Instead, think it's a matter of credibility and authenticity. Jez's often referred to as an Xbox and Microsoft "shill" with good reason (reasons later). Even by important figures such as Obsidian's co-founder. Xbox going to Jez signals they wanted controlled PR and favoured narratives, not opportunities for hard hitting insight or truth. Inadvertently very revealing. Xbox's moves this last week let us know how Xbox is still operating. +First Asha immediately begins aggressive toxic parasocial antics and "I'm one of you!" PR on social media that Xbox execs are famed for, to evangelise the fandom and have them run positive PR. +She creates a new Gamertag just a month ago with very irregular play, later admits it was a shared account played by others. +Her X responses seem robotic and inorganic. +Xbox have Tom Warren (another Xbox leaning journalist) of The Verge run a hit piece attempting to scapegoat Sarah Bond, which doesn't stand up to scrutiny. +In Satya Nadella's very long statement on the shake ups, Sarah Bond isn't mentioned once. +Asha's first interview is with Jez. +Messaging is a whole load of nothing. Teases things fans want to hear without actually committing to changes. What this all indirectly tells us is it's the same slippery and not so authentic Xbox, and we shouldn't really put much stock into anything they or their execs are currently saying. Only folk who are going to be won over by this controlled PR are the same naive echo chamber Xbox hopefuls who've fallen for or parrot every Xbox narrative/PR, despite countless flip flops, pivots and failings. So why's Jez Corden discredited or seen as an Xbox "shill" by so many? Myriad reasons. This is the same guy who said: +Development on Everwild was going well, gameplay loop was nailed and we'd see it soon, before it was cancelled shortly after. +He wasn't worried about The Initiative or Perfect Dark based on research he'd done, despite layoffs/Crystal Dynamics stuff. Was canned and studio shut shortly after. +Xbox wasn't porting games to PS5, rumour was fanboy hopium, before Xbox announced PS5 ports a few months later. +Implied all Laura Fryer worked on was Xbox One after her critical vid on Xbox, when she'd worked on OG Xbox and 360. +Physical games retail was dead in the UK after unfavourable Xbox sales, when data showed ~40% of sales of the Top 20 games were physical. +Said WuKong never mentioned Series S as a reason for Xbox version delay, implied it was a deal, despite WuKong director pinning blame on Series S. +Xbox might drop prices on games, only to suggest we knew price increases were coming when Xbox increased prices on GP. +No aspect of Halo rumours were true, when Halo moved to UE5 per rumours. +Rumours of Phil's retirement were made up, just months before he retired. +He'd never covered Avowed when called out, when he'd done an article hyping it. +Mischaracterised Tim Stuart's quote on bringing games to more platforms with clarification question to Phil on Game Pass instead of "first party experiences". +Sony's shown "no interest in mobile" when they acquired multiple mobile game studios, been open on mobile expansion and bringing more IP to mobile, set up a mobile gaming division in 2022 and have one of the worlds highest earning mobile games in Fate/Grand Order. +Promoted ABK acquisition and how good it'd be for devs/gamers, when Xbox has suffered 4k+ layoffs since (FAR higher than industry avg in % of total workforce), most in ABK, and GP has seen a 100% price increase in last 2+ years alone. I could go on and on. Point is, so much of the time Jez's running PR, defence and favoured narratives for Xbox, often with misinformation

NIB

19,584 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Ubisoft has gained this reputation after years making games that have been bad by current AAA standards and dogshit practices that every time I post Assassin’s Creed BF Resynced content, there has always been a comment or reply asking me “how much did Ubisoft pay you?” To make it clear, I bought this game with my own money and I was never paid to praise or promote it. Resynced has its fair share of serious issues that cannot be overlooked; buying all paid cosmetics costing more than the game itself, the cutscenes being capped to 30FPS or the fact that it requires online connection in the physical disc. All of these are valid issues and criticism that Ubisoft as a company should do better. That being said it, compared to what Ubisoft was making these past few years, Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced for the most part is a pretty good video-game imo, they've done an excellent job at remaking the original game. The upgraded visuals make the experience much better, new game mechanics like underwater swimming at any time and the removal of loading screens when docking or boarding is such a welcome feature. They've also done an amazing job at optimizing this game for PC which is quite rare these days for open world games. What are your thoughts?
1:51

Ubisoft has gained this reputation after years making games that have been bad by current AAA standards and dogshit practices that every time I post Assassin’s Creed BF Resynced content, there has always been a comment or reply asking me “how much did Ubisoft pay you?” To make it clear, I bought this game with my own money and I was never paid to praise or promote it. Resynced has its fair share of serious issues that cannot be overlooked; buying all paid cosmetics costing more than the game itself, the cutscenes being capped to 30FPS or the fact that it requires online connection in the physical disc. All of these are valid issues and criticism that Ubisoft as a company should do better. That being said it, compared to what Ubisoft was making these past few years, Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced for the most part is a pretty good video-game imo, they've done an excellent job at remaking the original game. The upgraded visuals make the experience much better, new game mechanics like underwater swimming at any time and the removal of loading screens when docking or boarding is such a welcome feature. They've also done an amazing job at optimizing this game for PC which is quite rare these days for open world games. What are your thoughts?

NikTek

70,430 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Hugo Martin (studio head of id Software) talks about the studio and its future. “There have been reports that we've been nerfed into the ground and gutted, and we are not; we have 50 people, and that's not true. We're the size we were when we made Doom 2016, and IDTech is very much alive and well. The, you have to understand, we have idTech engineers both in Frankfurt and, you know, at Machine Games; we collaborate quite a bit. So, you know, the IDTech is there, the Doom team is here, and we're excited to work on; to share with you guys more of what we're working on in the future when it is appropriate and approved.” via: Slayers Club Live
0:45

Hugo Martin (studio head of id Software) talks about the studio and its future. “There have been reports that we've been nerfed into the ground and gutted, and we are not; we have 50 people, and that's not true. We're the size we were when we made Doom 2016, and IDTech is very much alive and well. The, you have to understand, we have idTech engineers both in Frankfurt and, you know, at Machine Games; we collaborate quite a bit. So, you know, the IDTech is there, the Doom team is here, and we're excited to work on; to share with you guys more of what we're working on in the future when it is appropriate and approved.” via: Slayers Club Live

Idle Sloth

92,247 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Jeff Grubb put out a video titled "Xbox doesn't deserve your trust anymore" listing reasons, predominantly around Ninja Theory and Senua. 1. The #Xbox Showcase was deceptive now we know games like Senua were announced despite the studios potential planned closure. 2. Xbox is now using showcases and gamer hype not to sell games, but drum up investor interest for studios they want to shutter or spin off. Go to point 7 on why he is strongly against this, even if Ninja Theory agreed. 3. Ninja Theory was indirectly celebrating their own demise. Xbox being a "used car salesman talking about all the great features of this thing. And in this situation the used car is a bunch of people." 4. Calls into question all the other decisions around Ninja Theory and Project Mara. 5. "Damages the credibility of any time Microsoft talks about selling games in future." 6. "It makes Xbox leadership seem completely incomprehensible from the outside. Probably because internally they don't have a coherency between their decisions." 7. "Treating the studio like a meat market for the studio is insane." Believes they should have taken the loss and given the studio the resources to go off on their own, to find their own partners and funding. Full video link. Mine is slightly edited.
2:04

Jeff Grubb put out a video titled "Xbox doesn't deserve your trust anymore" listing reasons, predominantly around Ninja Theory and Senua. 1. The #Xbox Showcase was deceptive now we know games like Senua were announced despite the studios potential planned closure. 2. Xbox is now using showcases and gamer hype not to sell games, but drum up investor interest for studios they want to shutter or spin off. Go to point 7 on why he is strongly against this, even if Ninja Theory agreed. 3. Ninja Theory was indirectly celebrating their own demise. Xbox being a "used car salesman talking about all the great features of this thing. And in this situation the used car is a bunch of people." 4. Calls into question all the other decisions around Ninja Theory and Project Mara. 5. "Damages the credibility of any time Microsoft talks about selling games in future." 6. "It makes Xbox leadership seem completely incomprehensible from the outside. Probably because internally they don't have a coherency between their decisions." 7. "Treating the studio like a meat market for the studio is insane." Believes they should have taken the loss and given the studio the resources to go off on their own, to find their own partners and funding. Full video link. Mine is slightly edited.

NIB

36,637 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Toys For Bob are keen to work with XBOX on a Banjo-Kazooie game. "It's a franchise we love. As platformer fans, Banjo's top of the heap. We have some huge, huge fans of that franchise on our staff – I'm talking, they've got the Jiggie as their profile pic, kind of a thing. They're that level of fan. If the opportunity ever arose, that would be amazing. We love the franchise." "If you look at the through-line of the types of games we like to make, I can imagine that's part of that staple as well. I think of [those characters] as timeless. They're iconic, and I think the types of games we want to produce are ones that speak to a timeless place in the player as well, an ageless place – we call it the "inner child". So, I think they're wonderful games; we're huge fans." via: Pure Xbox
1:09

Toys For Bob are keen to work with XBOX on a Banjo-Kazooie game. "It's a franchise we love. As platformer fans, Banjo's top of the heap. We have some huge, huge fans of that franchise on our staff – I'm talking, they've got the Jiggie as their profile pic, kind of a thing. They're that level of fan. If the opportunity ever arose, that would be amazing. We love the franchise." "If you look at the through-line of the types of games we like to make, I can imagine that's part of that staple as well. I think of [those characters] as timeless. They're iconic, and I think the types of games we want to produce are ones that speak to a timeless place in the player as well, an ageless place – we call it the "inner child". So, I think they're wonderful games; we're huge fans." via: Pure Xbox

Idle Sloth

41,015 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Gears of War Reloaded Beta Main Menu! 👀🫡🎮 The Coalition Studio has stated ofcourse being a Beta that you might experience the following: ⚙️ This title is pre-release software ⚙️ Some platform features may not work correctly ⚙️ Some game features may not work correctly and might crash ⚙️ For any support queries, please visit the official support website! For the Gears of War Reloaded Beta you can download & install the Beta now for a size of 13.19 GB! On Xbox Series Consoles go to: My Games & Apps Full Library Xbox Game Pass Titles Install the Reloaded Beta found at the bottom On Xbox PC go to: The Gears of War Reloaded Beta goes LIVE on Friday June 13th-15th at 8PM UK, 3PM ET & 12PM PT for Weekend 1 featuring Team Deathmatch on Gridlock, Raven Down & Gold Rush! 🤯😱💥⚙️
2:27

Gears of War Reloaded Beta Main Menu! 👀🫡🎮 The Coalition Studio has stated ofcourse being a Beta that you might experience the following: ⚙️ This title is pre-release software ⚙️ Some platform features may not work correctly ⚙️ Some game features may not work correctly and might crash ⚙️ For any support queries, please visit the official support website! For the Gears of War Reloaded Beta you can download & install the Beta now for a size of 13.19 GB! On Xbox Series Consoles go to: My Games & Apps Full Library Xbox Game Pass Titles Install the Reloaded Beta found at the bottom On Xbox PC go to: The Gears of War Reloaded Beta goes LIVE on Friday June 13th-15th at 8PM UK, 3PM ET & 12PM PT for Weekend 1 featuring Team Deathmatch on Gridlock, Raven Down & Gold Rush! 🤯😱💥⚙️

Shadowz

25,964 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Naval: Marxism, besides denying human incentives, also has a problem where it just assumes that everything is finite and we're all just dividing up the same small set of things. Well, the cavemen didn't have color TVs, computers, cars, antibiotics, or medicine. They were not sitting around dividing up the same few things. The knowledge grows, and we create more. It also tends to assume that we can freeze frame at some point in society and say, 'Well, we have enough different kinds of sneakers, enough different kinds of housing, we just need to allocate it better.' And that is not how anything works. David Deutsch has a great definition of wealth, which he says is the set of physical transformations that we can affect. So, when you think about it that way, you realize that knowledge is not just stored capital in the classic Marxist sense (capital vs. labor), but it's also knowledge on what to do with that capital. The cavemen or Palaeolithic ancestors had access to all the same resources we did. They were living on the same Earth, and by the modern environmentalist arguments, they had a better Earth—they had more to do things with. But yet, they couldn't do anything. They were not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. Why? Because of knowledge. Life is not a zero-sum game, it's a positive-sum game. But we are hardwired to think it's a zero-sum game because, for millions or billions of years, there was no such thing as wealth. There was no such thing as persistent knowledge creation in the environment. What you had was a small amount of resources being divided up, and most of the games were status games—'Which monkey outranks which other monkey?' And that decides which monkey gets to eat first. We played that game for a billion years. Now, we come onto a recent game where, actually, we can all eat, and the big problem is obesity. It's no longer starvation. The big problem is boredom. It's not actually work. There's enough work. So, in this environment, switching your evolved mindset from a zero-sum game to a positive-sum game where we can all win, if we create knowledge together and use the resources that we have to create more resources and more wealth, that's the game we all need to be playing now.
2:11

.Naval: Marxism, besides denying human incentives, also has a problem where it just assumes that everything is finite and we're all just dividing up the same small set of things. Well, the cavemen didn't have color TVs, computers, cars, antibiotics, or medicine. They were not sitting around dividing up the same few things. The knowledge grows, and we create more. It also tends to assume that we can freeze frame at some point in society and say, 'Well, we have enough different kinds of sneakers, enough different kinds of housing, we just need to allocate it better.' And that is not how anything works. David Deutsch has a great definition of wealth, which he says is the set of physical transformations that we can affect. So, when you think about it that way, you realize that knowledge is not just stored capital in the classic Marxist sense (capital vs. labor), but it's also knowledge on what to do with that capital. The cavemen or Palaeolithic ancestors had access to all the same resources we did. They were living on the same Earth, and by the modern environmentalist arguments, they had a better Earth—they had more to do things with. But yet, they couldn't do anything. They were not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. Why? Because of knowledge. Life is not a zero-sum game, it's a positive-sum game. But we are hardwired to think it's a zero-sum game because, for millions or billions of years, there was no such thing as wealth. There was no such thing as persistent knowledge creation in the environment. What you had was a small amount of resources being divided up, and most of the games were status games—'Which monkey outranks which other monkey?' And that decides which monkey gets to eat first. We played that game for a billion years. Now, we come onto a recent game where, actually, we can all eat, and the big problem is obesity. It's no longer starvation. The big problem is boredom. It's not actually work. There's enough work. So, in this environment, switching your evolved mindset from a zero-sum game to a positive-sum game where we can all win, if we create knowledge together and use the resources that we have to create more resources and more wealth, that's the game we all need to be playing now.

Arjun Khemani

163,525 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is the closest Game we have to compare to GTA VI in terms of Open-World Gameplay. This Matrix: Awakens footage was recorded on Xbox Series X and as you can see the FPS is struggling to stay above 30FPS. The resolution also takes a big hit when you start moving the camera too fast because of so much processing happening at the same time. Considering GTA 6 has probably 10X times the mechanics of NPCs behavior going on and physics that are miles ahead of this game, it's safe to say that a performance mode is going to be near impossible in a PS5/Xbox Series X and S Version. Perhaps when PS5 Pro launches we will get a 60FPS mode, but things are looking rough right now. Let's see how well Rockstar Games manages to optimize their next GTA For more in-depth insights, updates, and discussions on the gaming and tech universe, join me on this exciting journey. Follow me @niktekofficial and become a part of the evolving gaming community
3:41

This is the closest Game we have to compare to GTA VI in terms of Open-World Gameplay. This Matrix: Awakens footage was recorded on Xbox Series X and as you can see the FPS is struggling to stay above 30FPS. The resolution also takes a big hit when you start moving the camera too fast because of so much processing happening at the same time. Considering GTA 6 has probably 10X times the mechanics of NPCs behavior going on and physics that are miles ahead of this game, it's safe to say that a performance mode is going to be near impossible in a PS5/Xbox Series X and S Version. Perhaps when PS5 Pro launches we will get a 60FPS mode, but things are looking rough right now. Let's see how well Rockstar Games manages to optimize their next GTA For more in-depth insights, updates, and discussions on the gaming and tech universe, join me on this exciting journey. Follow me @niktekofficial and become a part of the evolving gaming community

NikTek

400,682 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

One criticism I always see towards games like Red Dead Redemption 2 and Grand Theft Auto VI recently is the topic of small details. "Why does a game need so many details, it doesn't make the experience any better and takes longer to develop" While I do agree with the fact that Rockstar Games development schedules in between each release keep getting longer, the fact is that when you aim for such a high level of realism in a video-game, its not about graphics anymore, its about immersion. I'm sure that if you played RDR2, you know that your horse sweating or its balls shrinking in the cold don't add much to the gameplay itself, but it makes the game feel like its real. This is precisely what sets apart Rockstar Games from other game studios, the level of immersion you get in those games is unbeaten. RDR2, a game designed for the PS4 console has a level of fluidity and immersion that I have yet to see in a video-game from any other game studio, each game mechanic seems to work flawlessly that it feels like a living and breathing open world game. Hell, sometimes you feel bad for shooting an NPC which never happened to me in a video-game before. When you're playing it, hours can go by and you don't even. In other open-world games, sometimes you can notice limitations, for example the same NPCs appearing in one object or the same scripted conversations. RDR2 manages to make that gap of a video-game and reality feel thinner, not get rid of it entirely of course. Making such a massive game filled with tons of details means that it can be can be played for multiple years after its release and not feel outdated. Its not all about details of course, when a game takes so long to develop, the stakes get higher each time and Rockstar Games has to make sure that they deliver on the story that is being told too, hence the reason why their games have always been historically good in terms of writing. Now to address the elephant int he room, the main issue is that as the complexity increases for each new release and optimizing all of these systems to work in tandem, the development time increases and we get longer periods of waiting. Is all of this worth it? In my opinion, yes. Its Rockstar Games after all, they have the budget necessary and the talent to achieve this kind of feat. Not only does it raise the bar for what is possible to do in a video-game, but it also is highly rewarding when you play the game for the first time and its unlike anything you've seen these past couple of years. When I finished playing Red Dead Redemption 2 for the first time, every new game that came out felt outdated for me. Just as technology keeps going forward, the same applies here with open world games too. What are your thoughts on this topic?
1:10

One criticism I always see towards games like Red Dead Redemption 2 and Grand Theft Auto VI recently is the topic of small details. "Why does a game need so many details, it doesn't make the experience any better and takes longer to develop" While I do agree with the fact that Rockstar Games development schedules in between each release keep getting longer, the fact is that when you aim for such a high level of realism in a video-game, its not about graphics anymore, its about immersion. I'm sure that if you played RDR2, you know that your horse sweating or its balls shrinking in the cold don't add much to the gameplay itself, but it makes the game feel like its real. This is precisely what sets apart Rockstar Games from other game studios, the level of immersion you get in those games is unbeaten. RDR2, a game designed for the PS4 console has a level of fluidity and immersion that I have yet to see in a video-game from any other game studio, each game mechanic seems to work flawlessly that it feels like a living and breathing open world game. Hell, sometimes you feel bad for shooting an NPC which never happened to me in a video-game before. When you're playing it, hours can go by and you don't even. In other open-world games, sometimes you can notice limitations, for example the same NPCs appearing in one object or the same scripted conversations. RDR2 manages to make that gap of a video-game and reality feel thinner, not get rid of it entirely of course. Making such a massive game filled with tons of details means that it can be can be played for multiple years after its release and not feel outdated. Its not all about details of course, when a game takes so long to develop, the stakes get higher each time and Rockstar Games has to make sure that they deliver on the story that is being told too, hence the reason why their games have always been historically good in terms of writing. Now to address the elephant int he room, the main issue is that as the complexity increases for each new release and optimizing all of these systems to work in tandem, the development time increases and we get longer periods of waiting. Is all of this worth it? In my opinion, yes. Its Rockstar Games after all, they have the budget necessary and the talent to achieve this kind of feat. Not only does it raise the bar for what is possible to do in a video-game, but it also is highly rewarding when you play the game for the first time and its unlike anything you've seen these past couple of years. When I finished playing Red Dead Redemption 2 for the first time, every new game that came out felt outdated for me. Just as technology keeps going forward, the same applies here with open world games too. What are your thoughts on this topic?

NikTek

26,848 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

You can't compare Cyberpunk 2077 launch to GTA 6 and here's exactly why Cyberpunk 2077 was the CDPR's first installment to feature a futuristic city with tons of NPCs and fast moving cars, something which was never done before on Witcher games. The gameplay video from Cyberpunk 2077 shown off in 2019 had a clear text showing "work in progress - does not represent the final look of the game" After the launch disaster of Cyberpunk 2077, Marcin Iwiński also explained that the reason the game had so many bugs is that the game was designed for PC first in mind, then scaled down to consoles that still had a hard drive (PS4 and Xbox One) an extremely difficult task on its own, combined with the fact that the game development progress took a major hit during the pandemic. Rockstar Games on the other hand has a much different engine and experience working on large scale open world game filled with tons of NPCs and fast moving cars, including the fact that they're developing this game for current gen consoles first, then scaling it up for a PC release not vice versa. Are we guys suddenly forgetting the fact that Rockstar Games managed to get GTA V running on a PS3 console which had 256mb of VRAM and 256mb of RAM at that time? The reason Rockstar Games has shown zero gameplay of GTA 6 is because historically they save the gameplay showcase before the game launches, GTA 6 Trailer 2 came out in 2025 and all footage for that Trailer was captured on a base PS5 with a mix of gameplay and cutscenes. They'll obviously show off more gameplay on August 27th, but comparing Cyberpunk 2077 to GTA 6 isn't exactly fair for both companies. On one hand, it was CDPR's first time making that kind of genre of a game and on the other hand, it isn't Rockstar Games first time making a Grand Theft Auto game.
2:07

You can't compare Cyberpunk 2077 launch to GTA 6 and here's exactly why Cyberpunk 2077 was the CDPR's first installment to feature a futuristic city with tons of NPCs and fast moving cars, something which was never done before on Witcher games. The gameplay video from Cyberpunk 2077 shown off in 2019 had a clear text showing "work in progress - does not represent the final look of the game" After the launch disaster of Cyberpunk 2077, Marcin Iwiński also explained that the reason the game had so many bugs is that the game was designed for PC first in mind, then scaled down to consoles that still had a hard drive (PS4 and Xbox One) an extremely difficult task on its own, combined with the fact that the game development progress took a major hit during the pandemic. Rockstar Games on the other hand has a much different engine and experience working on large scale open world game filled with tons of NPCs and fast moving cars, including the fact that they're developing this game for current gen consoles first, then scaling it up for a PC release not vice versa. Are we guys suddenly forgetting the fact that Rockstar Games managed to get GTA V running on a PS3 console which had 256mb of VRAM and 256mb of RAM at that time? The reason Rockstar Games has shown zero gameplay of GTA 6 is because historically they save the gameplay showcase before the game launches, GTA 6 Trailer 2 came out in 2025 and all footage for that Trailer was captured on a base PS5 with a mix of gameplay and cutscenes. They'll obviously show off more gameplay on August 27th, but comparing Cyberpunk 2077 to GTA 6 isn't exactly fair for both companies. On one hand, it was CDPR's first time making that kind of genre of a game and on the other hand, it isn't Rockstar Games first time making a Grand Theft Auto game.

NikTek

103,390 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

"These 140 companies are effectively making a bet that the Clarity Act does not pass" "The way this is structured, all that revenue going to the issuer, Tether or Circle, will go to the companies utilizing it as they use it. That make all your money on the float model is what they're trying to kill" "The Genius Act codified into law that the issuers aren't allowed to pass on yield to customers. But once it leaves the issuer and goes to someone like Coinbase, they can right now do rewards and pass that on. That's where the banks are freaking out. Jamie Dimon and all of them think that same thing should be banned" "So 140 companies are taking advantage of what many see as a loophole. If the Clarity Act passes with the current language, that prohibition gets extended to Coinbase and all the third parties beyond the issuer. I was at 5% chance Clarity Act passes. These 140 companies that probably know more than me are clearly making a much more compelling bet"
2:32

"These 140 companies are effectively making a bet that the Clarity Act does not pass" "The way this is structured, all that revenue going to the issuer, Tether or Circle, will go to the companies utilizing it as they use it. That make all your money on the float model is what they're trying to kill" "The Genius Act codified into law that the issuers aren't allowed to pass on yield to customers. But once it leaves the issuer and goes to someone like Coinbase, they can right now do rewards and pass that on. That's where the banks are freaking out. Jamie Dimon and all of them think that same thing should be banned" "So 140 companies are taking advantage of what many see as a loophole. If the Clarity Act passes with the current language, that prohibition gets extended to Coinbase and all the third parties beyond the issuer. I was at 5% chance Clarity Act passes. These 140 companies that probably know more than me are clearly making a much more compelling bet"

The Wolf Of All Streets

87,755 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Gamergate 2 is underway. Former game executive and develop at Blizzard Mark Kern Grummz: "The way games are funded you don't use your own money. Even EA, it's games are hugely expensive to make they're they're upwards of you know 250 sometimes 600 million dollars it's for certain live games it's incredibly how expensive they are and to do that uh your CFO is your best friend. "You're counting on your CFO to get you tax breaks to get you in to put studios in regions which are financially favorable and you will borrow the cheap money you will get a cheap money to do it. Even EA does this. I worked with EA; we were putting together a deal where they were taking bailout money from the banks in the last financial crisis that we had, and they were applying that cheap money towards games same thing with Covid money. They're applying that cheap money towards games, and what has been the cheapest money while interest rates were still low, you know a couple of years ago it was ESG financing, and so they're going to take this money." "Because the returns on investment have been so poor on Wall Street for ESG funds, that source of Revenue is drying it up. This Woke machine cannot continue in the way that it is now for AAA gaming, and I think unfortunately, it's so entrenched that you're not going to see—you're not going to see much of an ability to course correct because the studios are—they're just gonna shut down."
2:39

Gamergate 2 is underway. Former game executive and develop at Blizzard Mark Kern Grummz: "The way games are funded you don't use your own money. Even EA, it's games are hugely expensive to make they're they're upwards of you know 250 sometimes 600 million dollars it's for certain live games it's incredibly how expensive they are and to do that uh your CFO is your best friend. "You're counting on your CFO to get you tax breaks to get you in to put studios in regions which are financially favorable and you will borrow the cheap money you will get a cheap money to do it. Even EA does this. I worked with EA; we were putting together a deal where they were taking bailout money from the banks in the last financial crisis that we had, and they were applying that cheap money towards games same thing with Covid money. They're applying that cheap money towards games, and what has been the cheapest money while interest rates were still low, you know a couple of years ago it was ESG financing, and so they're going to take this money." "Because the returns on investment have been so poor on Wall Street for ESG funds, that source of Revenue is drying it up. This Woke machine cannot continue in the way that it is now for AAA gaming, and I think unfortunately, it's so entrenched that you're not going to see—you're not going to see much of an ability to course correct because the studios are—they're just gonna shut down."

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

6,764,676 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren