Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
🚨 In 1983 a foreign intelligence operative walked into an American software company Pretending to be someone he wasn't His real name was Rafi Eitan Head of LAKAM Israel's covert Bureau of Scientific Relations Same unit that ran Jonathan Pollard 👀 He wanted one thing A piece of software... show more
112,870 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)
0 Kommentare
Keine Kommentare verfügbar
Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt
![Incredible, and maybe even unprecedented, answer by Arnaud Montebourg - former French Minister of Economy - to the question "what method do the Americans use to wage economic warfare against us?" Here's the translation (by me): "They use military tools. First of all, they use all the listening and intelligence systems that they built on after 9/11. They don't listen to terrorists...well they certainly do and that's very good...but they listen to foreign companies that compete with theirs. So it's very simple, it became clear in 2014 when Snowden revealed that there were 75 million conversations and emails that had been exploited by the NSA on France, on French companies. When Pierucci - a man who should wear the Legion of Honor today because he defended France rather than its interests by agreeing to serve two unjustified years in prison in US jails in the Alstom affair... when Mr. Pierucci was taken into custody in Manhattan by the prosecutors they put under his nose 1 million emails. How did they get 1 million emails? By illegal eavesdropping. 1 million emails: it would have taken a lawyer 3 years to read through them… so he couldn't defend himself. So those are the military tools. Second, they have a tool called extraterritorial law. The Americans are using a form of law, which is an imperialist law, which consists in declaring themselves competent for matters which in no way concern them. Example: Alstom, a contract between Indonesia and a French company. They consider that there was an offense that was committed in this matter 10 years ago and they sue Alstom! The United States is not a victim, no American company was involved in this case. They declare themselves policeman of the world by undermining the sovereign interests. Therefore this is interference. They do it in ALL fields, and especially the economic field. For example ITAR. ITAR is interesting: the United States has set a list of 22,000 components on which it grants itself the right to authorize or not the export by a foreign power. Example: you buy a varnish to put on the wing of the Rafale [a French fighter plane] which is on the ITAR list because it is not produced in France but in the US or elsewhere... because of this single varnish they allow themselves the right to say: 'you have the right to export to such and such a country, but not to this one because it is an enemy of the United States of America'. Why should I care if he's an enemy of the United States of America? The enemies of my allies are not necessarily my enemies! Example: they banned the export of Rafales to Egypt because of ITAR. Is that so, and why? So our urgency should be to produce these 22,000 products in France... Or in Europe, in allied countries which are also victims of ITAR. This is a sovereign policy. I can also tell you about the American Patriot Act. 2001, September 11, what do they do? When a French company is bought by an American company, the American government has the unilateral power to request all the information on a company controlled by an American company. Absolutely all the information: patents, technologies, people, etc. Without any motivation and without judicial authorization, which means that these are illegal searches. This is why in the affair of the takeover of the valves which equip our nuclear submarines and power stations - the Segault valves which are manufactured in Mennecy, Essonne - I intervened by saying 'it is out of question that this business goes under American control' and it is now a company that is controlled by Canadians. Canadians do not have extraterritorial rights, it is not an issue to work with Canadians. But Americans are different because they are predators. This is the reason why I said 'it is out of the question that Segault, who equips our nuclear submarines, gives our information to a foreign power'. Because Canadians do not have the right to do so, if they do it is criminal. But for Americans it is the law to do so!"](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1665370246126125060/ext_tw_video_thumb/1665366689364742144/pu/img/prhy21KoPh81JxcL.jpg)
![“The CIA is not the top of the food chain.” “The oligarchs are the ones really in charge.” “Intelligence agencies work for them.” Whitney Webb just broke down the truth about the Epstein class. “This is who Epstein was really working for … ” “There’s this transnational group that Epstein was part of.” “He’s like middle management in it.” “They are not overseen by any national government, nor loyal to any of them.” “The public governments that we all know have basically been reduced to enabling environments for the policies made by these other people that are then filtered down through think tanks or philanthropic foundations.” “The Gates Foundation, for example.” “Epstein was setting up a lot of these philanthropic foundations that influence policy.” “He was doing a lot of shady financial stuff, helping powerful people hide their money.” “One of the funds that Epstein was involved in setting up was actually handling money for our current Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent.” “And he refuses to release Epstein’s Treasury records.” “A key actor in this network testified to Congress in the early ‘70s about what was going on with this group.” “I think he really gave it away, but they didn’t care.” “It’s really brazen.” “It’s Samuel Pisar, who was a lawyer.” “He was Robert Maxwell’s lawyer and … involved with building up commerce relations between the eastern bloc and the western bloc during the Cold War.” “What he argued in the early ‘70s to Congress is that what was happening was the creation of a trans-ideological corporation that was becoming the de facto power in the world, making the nation state irrelevant.” “It was capitalist western multinational corporations entering into joint ventures with communist state-owned corporations.” “These forces were essentially joining hands and creating a structure that was really running the world of economic governance.” “So you see it back then in the early ‘70s being told to Congress: we’re making a sovereign corporation that runs everything.” “It doesn’t matter what national governments do.” “National governments bow to us.” “And if you look at intelligence agencies, let’s take the CIA for example, they serve those same masters.” “For example, if you look at the early coups of the CIA, who were they for?” “Iran in [1953], it was for Anglo American Oil.” “In Guatemala, it was for United Fruit Company.” “The CIA’s regime changes are almost always at the behest of corporations.” Whitney Webb Jimmy Dore](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2037609650686673117/amplify_video_thumb/2037609330292523008/img/-JiYMZyj3iXIZIju.jpg)
