Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

In today's films, it's nearly impossible to see a sequence where a complex topic is being discussed, testing the intellectual reasoning of each character. Not only that, but the challenge also lies in integrating such a scene into the screenplay and making it engaging, especially when you don't rely... show more

Cine Vichaar

69,380 subscribers

119,742 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Kunst

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von मयंक सिंह गहलोत

मयंक सिंह गहलोतvor 1 Jahr

Your post captures the essence of a lost art in modern cinema 🎥 - the deep, intellectual dialogue 🗣️ that not only challenges the characters 🤔 but also invites the audience into a cerebral dance 💃. There was a time when films were a playground for thought 🧠, where complexity was celebrated 🎉, and viewers reveled in the nuances of human reasoning and debate 🔍. Today's cinematic landscape 🌆, as you've astutely pointed out, often opts for more digestible, fast-paced content ⚡, perhaps as a mirror to our quicker, more distracted lives 📱. The rarity of these intellectually stimulating scenes isn't just a loss for narrative depth 📉 but also for the cultivation of patience ⏳ and critical thinking 💡 among viewers. Moreover, the fear of "cancel culture" 😨 might indeed deter creators from exploring controversial or intricate subjects 🚫, depriving us of potentially transformative discussions 🚧. Here's hoping for a renaissance 🌟 where filmmakers can weave complexity back into the fabric of film 🎬, trusting in an audience's capacity to engage, reflect, and appreciate the cerebral as much as the visual 👁️‍🗨️. Your post not only highlights this shift 🔄 but also champions the kind of cinema that dares to think out loud 🎙️. Beautifully said. 😊 #Cinema #Art #Movies #Culture #Politics #Protest

Profilbild von Akshay

Akshayvor 1 Jahr

You should watch the movie “the man from earth” - it’s 90 minutes of just this (logical discussion) and is shot entire in one room, one of the best movies I have seen.

Profilbild von Prateek Jain

Prateek Jainvor 1 Jahr

Pure Hindi has such an amazing sound to it. Sounds very measured and intellectual. Hindi convoluted with Urdu and English and slang sounds so bad and the fact even those who speak Hindi don't talk like anymore is depressing. I imagine it's the same for pure Tamil Malayalam etc

Profilbild von Anil sharma

Anil sharmavor 1 Jahr

Om Puri is explaining ,Antonio Gramsci,s Marxist theory of Cultural hegemony,which is to capture all megaphones that controls the mind of Society e.g media, Art,Movies, Music, Folk arts stand up comedy (in new times),satire etc No wonder it,s from the stable of Govind Nihalani

Profilbild von Saurabh Suman

Saurabh Sumanvor 1 Jahr

Profound thoughts. I hope some filmmakers will try such complex yet engaging sequence in today's movies. They will certainly find an audience.

Profilbild von prasann

prasannvor 1 Jahr

Watch Ek Doctor Ki Maut - One of the best well written character And also Natsamrat by Nana Patekar

Profilbild von ankur saxena

ankur saxenavor 1 Jahr

Impossible today- u need such writing, actors true to their craft, no hidden agenda for or against the govt…. Audience will listen but the movie makers today are looking for marketing and showbiz rather than quality…

Profilbild von chemnitr

chemnitrvor 1 Jahr

You can see Upanishad Ganga available in you tube . 50 + episodes , great story telling with deep thoughts, philosophy. Likes of Huma Qureshi r there .

Profilbild von prateek khare

prateek kharevor 1 Jahr

Lost art sure. Message can be read either ways. Chanakya 1991 series dialogues were even more complex in language and yet crisp. Question - are longer complex dialogues indicators of superior art if the message is lost on people?

Profilbild von Kirty Kochar

Kirty Kocharvor 1 Jahr

What a cerebral discussion which is so very relevant even in current circumstances, however how many people in these times will understand and give credence to these type of movies .

Ähnliche Videos

#WATCH | Mumbai | Shiv sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut says, "...A few people refuse to accept the culture and the Marathi language... If not in Maharashtra, where would the Marathi language be - in Pakistan, Bangladesh, or Nepal?... If people do a movement for any language, Ashish Shelar compares them to terrorists of Pahalgam, it's wrong, and it shows the BJP's mindset."

#WATCH | Mumbai | Shiv sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut says, "...A few people refuse to accept the culture and the Marathi language... If not in Maharashtra, where would the Marathi language be - in Pakistan, Bangladesh, or Nepal?... If people do a movement for any language, Ashish Shelar compares them to terrorists of Pahalgam, it's wrong, and it shows the BJP's mindset."

ANI

16,166 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Peter Jackson talks about AI in Hollywood. Calls it “a tool” like stop-motion or CGI before and what ultimately matters is “imagination, originality” of whoever uses the tool: “I think AI — used in the right way — is a tool like any other tool. [The original] King Kong…was stop-motion and done by a person moving a rubber creature. Why shouldn't somebody on a computer using AI software be able to create their own imagery? They should. It's a tool. It's no different from many other tools that have existed over the years. But the other side of it is that it's always going to come down to the imagination and originality of the person feeding the instructions into the AI program. It's not that you're going to type in an instruction and it's going to generate your shot, and that's that. The question is: is it actually interesting? Is it funny? Is it imaginative? And are you going to stitch it together to make a narrative, a story? Some people will make really great films that way. Some people will do exactly the same process and their film will be crap, just like in the normal film industry. Whether it's AI or anything else, it comes down to whether the person behind it — or the people behind it — have originality, imagination, and an ability to entertain people.”

Peter Jackson talks about AI in Hollywood. Calls it “a tool” like stop-motion or CGI before and what ultimately matters is “imagination, originality” of whoever uses the tool: “I think AI — used in the right way — is a tool like any other tool. [The original] King Kong…was stop-motion and done by a person moving a rubber creature. Why shouldn't somebody on a computer using AI software be able to create their own imagery? They should. It's a tool. It's no different from many other tools that have existed over the years. But the other side of it is that it's always going to come down to the imagination and originality of the person feeding the instructions into the AI program. It's not that you're going to type in an instruction and it's going to generate your shot, and that's that. The question is: is it actually interesting? Is it funny? Is it imaginative? And are you going to stitch it together to make a narrative, a story? Some people will make really great films that way. Some people will do exactly the same process and their film will be crap, just like in the normal film industry. Whether it's AI or anything else, it comes down to whether the person behind it — or the people behind it — have originality, imagination, and an ability to entertain people.”

Bearly AI

43,816 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi | On the Kerala Story 2 movie, Surbhi Tiwari, wife of BJP MP Manoj Tiwari, says, "...I want to tell people not to sit at home and talk; come out and watch the film. If you look at the documents, read the case, and watch the news, you will understand whether this is propaganda or whether such films are holding a mirror to society... This is not a film; it holds a mirror to society, and we all need to see it... If we want such incidents to stop, we must ensure that what is shown in this film does not happen to any Hindu girl..." (06.03)

#WATCH | Delhi | On the Kerala Story 2 movie, Surbhi Tiwari, wife of BJP MP Manoj Tiwari, says, "...I want to tell people not to sit at home and talk; come out and watch the film. If you look at the documents, read the case, and watch the news, you will understand whether this is propaganda or whether such films are holding a mirror to society... This is not a film; it holds a mirror to society, and we all need to see it... If we want such incidents to stop, we must ensure that what is shown in this film does not happen to any Hindu girl..." (06.03)

ANI

61,021 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Tim Cook: "It's very difficult to replicate culture." "It takes a long time. You have to hire the right people — and then those people have to hire the right people." "Apple is such a unique place [that] it's not possible to replicate it ... Apple is just in a party of one."

Tim Cook: "It's very difficult to replicate culture." "It takes a long time. You have to hire the right people — and then those people have to hire the right people." "Apple is such a unique place [that] it's not possible to replicate it ... Apple is just in a party of one."

Kevin Carpenter

106,295 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

if you want to make short films but feel stuck when it comes to "story" - try portraying a mood/feeling. you don't always need a satisfying conclusion or a standard 3 part structure. everyone will bombard you with narrative importance, and of course it's important, but some of my favourite shorts and feature films have fairly simple loose scripts, but they convey an incredible tone and feeling. you can just create a world and bring people into it for a few minutes. focus on the feeling with good production design, acting, and sound. you're practicing so don't let writing hold you back. will some people want more? absolutely. will it make sense to everyone? doubtful. the key is it has to be interesting to YOU.. stop caring about everyone else. make something that you like because you're not unique, there will be other people on your wavelength, and if they're not so be it. doesn't matter. give it a feeling that you like and do everything you can to convey it cinematically. ultimately the only audience member that truly matters is you, so if you have a really simple idea like "why does air chilled chicken sound funny?" go execute it and see what happens.

if you want to make short films but feel stuck when it comes to "story" - try portraying a mood/feeling. you don't always need a satisfying conclusion or a standard 3 part structure. everyone will bombard you with narrative importance, and of course it's important, but some of my favourite shorts and feature films have fairly simple loose scripts, but they convey an incredible tone and feeling. you can just create a world and bring people into it for a few minutes. focus on the feeling with good production design, acting, and sound. you're practicing so don't let writing hold you back. will some people want more? absolutely. will it make sense to everyone? doubtful. the key is it has to be interesting to YOU.. stop caring about everyone else. make something that you like because you're not unique, there will be other people on your wavelength, and if they're not so be it. doesn't matter. give it a feeling that you like and do everything you can to convey it cinematically. ultimately the only audience member that truly matters is you, so if you have a really simple idea like "why does air chilled chicken sound funny?" go execute it and see what happens.

patrick.

56,003 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Former EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell: Russia will only be able to destroy Ukraine if Ukraine is unable to defend itself. If the US does not provide the means to do so, are we going to do it? Question mark. This is the existential question that Europe must answer for itself: Are we in a position to help Ukraine defend itself even if the United States does not? It depends on how willing we are. So far, we have helped Ukraine more than the United States, both in civilian and military terms. Can we do even more and replace the United States? This comes at a cost, and what is needed is not only the will and the ability to pay for it, but also to convert the money into weapons. Because people don't go to the front with a bag of cash; people go to the front with weapons. And between money and weapons there is something called industry, that is, production capacity.

Former EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell: Russia will only be able to destroy Ukraine if Ukraine is unable to defend itself. If the US does not provide the means to do so, are we going to do it? Question mark. This is the existential question that Europe must answer for itself: Are we in a position to help Ukraine defend itself even if the United States does not? It depends on how willing we are. So far, we have helped Ukraine more than the United States, both in civilian and military terms. Can we do even more and replace the United States? This comes at a cost, and what is needed is not only the will and the ability to pay for it, but also to convert the money into weapons. Because people don't go to the front with a bag of cash; people go to the front with weapons. And between money and weapons there is something called industry, that is, production capacity.

Anton Gerashchenko

51,525 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The best investment I ever made is in myself, to make the decision a long time ago to jump into entrepreneurship, to take the risk, to take the chance. Many people don't do it. Only about a third of the population ever tries it, and the other two-thirds end up working for the third that gave it a shot. That's basically what happens. It's a very tough thing to invest in yourself because you don't know the outcome. It's lots of risk. It's great to do it in your 20s because if you're successful, it'll redefine your life.

The best investment I ever made is in myself, to make the decision a long time ago to jump into entrepreneurship, to take the risk, to take the chance. Many people don't do it. Only about a third of the population ever tries it, and the other two-thirds end up working for the third that gave it a shot. That's basically what happens. It's a very tough thing to invest in yourself because you don't know the outcome. It's lots of risk. It's great to do it in your 20s because if you're successful, it'll redefine your life.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

43,648 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Highly recommend giving Odd Taxi a watch if you need a new anime. It's only 13 episodes so it's not a big commitment. It's like a Quentin Tarantino movie in a series. Don't let the art style fool you, it's very complex. It follows the life of a taxi driver (the walrus) named Odokawa who somehow finds himself involved in missing schoolgirl, the police, the yakuza, and many other interesting characters. All from the perspective of being just a simple driver. What's interesting is the entire plot to the series is fully laid out in the opening credits, but you'll never be able to figure it out without seeing it. It's a gem, give it a watch. Lots of twists and turns. You won't regret it.

Highly recommend giving Odd Taxi a watch if you need a new anime. It's only 13 episodes so it's not a big commitment. It's like a Quentin Tarantino movie in a series. Don't let the art style fool you, it's very complex. It follows the life of a taxi driver (the walrus) named Odokawa who somehow finds himself involved in missing schoolgirl, the police, the yakuza, and many other interesting characters. All from the perspective of being just a simple driver. What's interesting is the entire plot to the series is fully laid out in the opening credits, but you'll never be able to figure it out without seeing it. It's a gem, give it a watch. Lots of twists and turns. You won't regret it.

Autism Capital 🧩

47,680 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

BONGANI BALOYI I think I was young and still ignorant when I joined the DA My family disapproved my involvement with people who are hoarding racists amongst them I soon found it impossible to remain to be in the same party with people who have such chequered background. It is impossible to seek the same future which such characters. [Bongani realises what many of us have long see the DA to be: it's largely a party which is a refugee for unrepentant racists. Black people in the DA, and genuine progressive white people, will soon realise that Helen Zille and her DA are not interested in having a future where black and white people could ever be equal and where everyone would cringe on racism.]

BONGANI BALOYI I think I was young and still ignorant when I joined the DA My family disapproved my involvement with people who are hoarding racists amongst them I soon found it impossible to remain to be in the same party with people who have such chequered background. It is impossible to seek the same future which such characters. [Bongani realises what many of us have long see the DA to be: it's largely a party which is a refugee for unrepentant racists. Black people in the DA, and genuine progressive white people, will soon realise that Helen Zille and her DA are not interested in having a future where black and white people could ever be equal and where everyone would cringe on racism.]

Constitution First 🇿🇦

46,934 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Vivek Ramaswamy message to YouTube is actually a much more important message about Free Speech “This is a message for the leadership of YouTube — My understanding is in the last 24 hours, you locked the accounts and shut down the accounts of two guys, Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones. They have big followings on the American right. I think it's better if you just unlock those accounts and let the guys be heard. —The reason I'm asking you to do it is that censorship isn't good for America. It's antithetical to our culture, and we're the country on God's green Earth where we're able to talk to each other in the open I want to credit YouTube and Google and your parent company and so much of your competitors in Silicon Valley for creating the first instance of the free and open internet with search engines. It's a beautiful thing for democratizing speech. But I think we take a step in the wrong direction when we choke those same technologies that allow us to access open debate and open ideas. It breeds discontent. It breeds frustration. It actually breeds mistrust. If you tell people they can't speak, that's when they scream. And if you tell people they can't scream, that's when they tear things down. So I think pre- free speech is a precondition for peace. It's a precondition for the scientific method. It's a precondition for our shared unity, our shared national identity as Americans. — It's the question of whether this is good or bad for America, and I think we live in a moment right now where when we tell people, whether it's the government or even a powerful company, when you tell people that because of who you are, you deserve not to be heard, I think that actually divides us. Even if it's done with the best of intentions of thinking it brings most of the rest of the country together, in the long run, it actually throws kerosene on the very flame you were trying to, to quash. — It's not even about the content. It's about the principle. I'd ask you to restore the accounts of those guys and believe me, it will be a down payment on beginning to reunite this country, a project on which we have yet a very long way to go. Thanks a lot for considering.”

Vivek Ramaswamy message to YouTube is actually a much more important message about Free Speech “This is a message for the leadership of YouTube — My understanding is in the last 24 hours, you locked the accounts and shut down the accounts of two guys, Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones. They have big followings on the American right. I think it's better if you just unlock those accounts and let the guys be heard. —The reason I'm asking you to do it is that censorship isn't good for America. It's antithetical to our culture, and we're the country on God's green Earth where we're able to talk to each other in the open I want to credit YouTube and Google and your parent company and so much of your competitors in Silicon Valley for creating the first instance of the free and open internet with search engines. It's a beautiful thing for democratizing speech. But I think we take a step in the wrong direction when we choke those same technologies that allow us to access open debate and open ideas. It breeds discontent. It breeds frustration. It actually breeds mistrust. If you tell people they can't speak, that's when they scream. And if you tell people they can't scream, that's when they tear things down. So I think pre- free speech is a precondition for peace. It's a precondition for the scientific method. It's a precondition for our shared unity, our shared national identity as Americans. — It's the question of whether this is good or bad for America, and I think we live in a moment right now where when we tell people, whether it's the government or even a powerful company, when you tell people that because of who you are, you deserve not to be heard, I think that actually divides us. Even if it's done with the best of intentions of thinking it brings most of the rest of the country together, in the long run, it actually throws kerosene on the very flame you were trying to, to quash. — It's not even about the content. It's about the principle. I'd ask you to restore the accounts of those guys and believe me, it will be a down payment on beginning to reunite this country, a project on which we have yet a very long way to go. Thanks a lot for considering.”

Wall Street Apes

79,456 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Alan Watts on why meditation has no purpose: Alan Watts begins by explaining the first basic reason for meditation. It interrupts our constant internal monologue: "Now, obviously, if I talk all the time, I don't hear what anyone else has to say. And so in exactly the same way, if I think all the time, that is to say, if I talk to myself all the time, I don't have anything to think about except thoughts. And therefore, I'm living entirely in the world of symbols and am never in relationship with reality." But then Watts pivots to a deeper, more counterintuitive point: meditation, properly understood, has no purpose at all. He compares it to music and dancing: "When we make music, we don't do it in order to reach a certain point, such as the end of the composition. If that were the purpose of music, to get to the end of the piece then obviously the fastest players would be the best." The same applies to dance: "When we dance, we are not aiming to arrive at a particular place on the floor, as we would be if we were taking a journey. When we dance, the journey itself is the point. When we play music, the playing itself is the point." This is where Watts delivers his core insight about meditation: "Meditation is the discovery that the point of life is always arrived at in the immediate moment. And therefore, if you meditate for an ulterior motive, that is to say, to improve your mind, to improve your character, to be more efficient in life, you've got your eye on the future and you are not meditating." Watts argues the future is an illusion we chase at our own expense: "Because the future is a concept. It doesn't exist. As the proverb says, 'tomorrow never comes.' There is no such thing as tomorrow. There never will be. Because time is always now." He pushes back against how religion has framed contemplative practice: "Meditation is supposed to be fun. It's not something you do as a grim duty. The trouble with religion as we know it is that it is so mixed up with grim duties. We do it because it's good for you; it's a kind of self-punishment." Watts closes with what he calls the real essence of the practice: "It's a kind of digging the present. It's a kind of grooving with the eternal now and brings us into a state of peace where we can understand that the point of life. The place where it's at is simply here and now."

Alan Watts on why meditation has no purpose: Alan Watts begins by explaining the first basic reason for meditation. It interrupts our constant internal monologue: "Now, obviously, if I talk all the time, I don't hear what anyone else has to say. And so in exactly the same way, if I think all the time, that is to say, if I talk to myself all the time, I don't have anything to think about except thoughts. And therefore, I'm living entirely in the world of symbols and am never in relationship with reality." But then Watts pivots to a deeper, more counterintuitive point: meditation, properly understood, has no purpose at all. He compares it to music and dancing: "When we make music, we don't do it in order to reach a certain point, such as the end of the composition. If that were the purpose of music, to get to the end of the piece then obviously the fastest players would be the best." The same applies to dance: "When we dance, we are not aiming to arrive at a particular place on the floor, as we would be if we were taking a journey. When we dance, the journey itself is the point. When we play music, the playing itself is the point." This is where Watts delivers his core insight about meditation: "Meditation is the discovery that the point of life is always arrived at in the immediate moment. And therefore, if you meditate for an ulterior motive, that is to say, to improve your mind, to improve your character, to be more efficient in life, you've got your eye on the future and you are not meditating." Watts argues the future is an illusion we chase at our own expense: "Because the future is a concept. It doesn't exist. As the proverb says, 'tomorrow never comes.' There is no such thing as tomorrow. There never will be. Because time is always now." He pushes back against how religion has framed contemplative practice: "Meditation is supposed to be fun. It's not something you do as a grim duty. The trouble with religion as we know it is that it is so mixed up with grim duties. We do it because it's good for you; it's a kind of self-punishment." Watts closes with what he calls the real essence of the practice: "It's a kind of digging the present. It's a kind of grooving with the eternal now and brings us into a state of peace where we can understand that the point of life. The place where it's at is simply here and now."

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

13,102 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Rep. Roy on phone record provision in government funding bill: "There were Democrats and Republicans involved with it. But look, I think there's going to be a lot of people if they look and understand this, they're going to see it as a self-serving, self-dealing kind of stuff. And I don't think that's right... The potential to have dollars going to United States senators when we've got American citizens, whether it was J6ers, whether it's people from the FACE Act, whether it was others that have also had the full force of the federal government through the Department of Justice targeting and coming down on them, and they're going to say, oh, you can slide in a provision in here for United States senators. It is beside my comprehension that this got put in the bill, and it's why people have such a low opinion of this town."

Rep. Roy on phone record provision in government funding bill: "There were Democrats and Republicans involved with it. But look, I think there's going to be a lot of people if they look and understand this, they're going to see it as a self-serving, self-dealing kind of stuff. And I don't think that's right... The potential to have dollars going to United States senators when we've got American citizens, whether it was J6ers, whether it's people from the FACE Act, whether it was others that have also had the full force of the federal government through the Department of Justice targeting and coming down on them, and they're going to say, oh, you can slide in a provision in here for United States senators. It is beside my comprehension that this got put in the bill, and it's why people have such a low opinion of this town."

Rep. Chip Roy Press Office

23,439 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Tribute to 36. This one is a bit long for the short attention span theater that is twitter but if you stick it out I don't think you will regret it. Dedicated to the people who put their hearts and souls into this work

Tribute to 36. This one is a bit long for the short attention span theater that is twitter but if you stick it out I don't think you will regret it. Dedicated to the people who put their hearts and souls into this work

Shaun Gisler

16,098 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“Critical race theory and the disciples of the social justice movement have rehabilitated racial thinking to an extreme level, where now it is the first thing that people think about. It's a very sad step backwards and I do believe that we need to reclaim that ideal of colorblindness as a really, really beautiful humanitarian thing. And it isn't to ignore racial or cultural differences. It isn't to demean it. It isn't to pretend they don't exist and say, 'I don't see color in a literal sense.' You just don't treat people differently on that basis. And it's not the thing you think of first when you think of a human being. There's more to us.” Very well said Andrew Doyle! 👏

“Critical race theory and the disciples of the social justice movement have rehabilitated racial thinking to an extreme level, where now it is the first thing that people think about. It's a very sad step backwards and I do believe that we need to reclaim that ideal of colorblindness as a really, really beautiful humanitarian thing. And it isn't to ignore racial or cultural differences. It isn't to demean it. It isn't to pretend they don't exist and say, 'I don't see color in a literal sense.' You just don't treat people differently on that basis. And it's not the thing you think of first when you think of a human being. There's more to us.” Very well said Andrew Doyle! 👏

Michael Shermer

37,342 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Men should NOT be in women's restrooms. See? It's not that hard to say. But it seems the modern state of the democratic party won't let you say that if you want to get elected to be the governor of California. Eric DID NOT want to say men should not be in women's restrooms. This is the modern state of the democratic party. Believing a man should be able to put a wig on, say he's a woman and start going into women's restrooms as if he is actually a woman..

Men should NOT be in women's restrooms. See? It's not that hard to say. But it seems the modern state of the democratic party won't let you say that if you want to get elected to be the governor of California. Eric DID NOT want to say men should not be in women's restrooms. This is the modern state of the democratic party. Believing a man should be able to put a wig on, say he's a woman and start going into women's restrooms as if he is actually a woman..

Jeffery Mead

35,508 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

ELON: WE MUST PUT AN END TO THE TYRANNY OF THE BUREAUCRACY “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people. Then, you do not have democracy, but you have rule of the bureau — bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” Source: DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 2025

ELON: WE MUST PUT AN END TO THE TYRANNY OF THE BUREAUCRACY “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people. Then, you do not have democracy, but you have rule of the bureau — bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” Source: DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 2025

Mario Nawfal

1,738,796 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

When monks leave their monasteries to walk for peace, it's not only symbolic, it's a warning. They don't seek attention. They don't ask for power. They walk only when the world is out of balance. They carry nothing but what's given to them. This isn't a protest. It's a prayer in motion. The fact that Buddhist monks are walking for peace in America should make us all pause. This is serious, rare, & it matters. People need to quietly stand and watch to take it in. Understand the significance. They’ve never walked in the US.

When monks leave their monasteries to walk for peace, it's not only symbolic, it's a warning. They don't seek attention. They don't ask for power. They walk only when the world is out of balance. They carry nothing but what's given to them. This isn't a protest. It's a prayer in motion. The fact that Buddhist monks are walking for peace in America should make us all pause. This is serious, rare, & it matters. People need to quietly stand and watch to take it in. Understand the significance. They’ve never walked in the US.

Boston Smalls

134,352 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

"All the drivers here, they're exceptional. And such a huge part that, I don't know if it gets commented on, is having confidence in the vehicle that you're driving, with the tool that you're using." "When you lose that confidence, you shed a lot of time." "So the confidence has finally come back. And that's what you're seeing today. It's literally just having the confidence to be able to throw that car into the corner, and it's going to stick. And also, just after driving it for so long, you get used to it." [2023 🩷]

"All the drivers here, they're exceptional. And such a huge part that, I don't know if it gets commented on, is having confidence in the vehicle that you're driving, with the tool that you're using." "When you lose that confidence, you shed a lot of time." "So the confidence has finally come back. And that's what you're seeing today. It's literally just having the confidence to be able to throw that car into the corner, and it's going to stick. And also, just after driving it for so long, you get used to it." [2023 🩷]

sim

51,299 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI co-founder, on why the company that builds AGI shouldn't be chasing infinite profits: Speaking on the No Priors podcast, Ilya Sutskever turns a question on the very technology he's working to build. "If you believe that the technology that we are building, AGI, could potentially be so capable as to do every single task that people do... does it mean that it might unemploy everyone? Well, I don't know, but it's not impossible." From that possibility, Ilya Sutskever draws a conclusion about how such a company should be structured: "And if that's the case, it makes sense. It will make a lot of sense if the company that builds such a technology would not be incentivized to make infinite profits." But he doesn't present this as a settled view. He immediately points to the force that complicates it — competition: "I don't know if it will literally play out this way because of competition in AI. So there will be multiple companies and I think that will have some unforeseen implications on the argument which I'm making. But that was the thinking." His point is simple: if AGI can do everything a person can, it might put people out of work on a massive scale, and that changes things.

Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI co-founder, on why the company that builds AGI shouldn't be chasing infinite profits: Speaking on the No Priors podcast, Ilya Sutskever turns a question on the very technology he's working to build. "If you believe that the technology that we are building, AGI, could potentially be so capable as to do every single task that people do... does it mean that it might unemploy everyone? Well, I don't know, but it's not impossible." From that possibility, Ilya Sutskever draws a conclusion about how such a company should be structured: "And if that's the case, it makes sense. It will make a lot of sense if the company that builds such a technology would not be incentivized to make infinite profits." But he doesn't present this as a settled view. He immediately points to the force that complicates it — competition: "I don't know if it will literally play out this way because of competition in AI. So there will be multiple companies and I think that will have some unforeseen implications on the argument which I'm making. But that was the thinking." His point is simple: if AGI can do everything a person can, it might put people out of work on a massive scale, and that changes things.

Big Brain AI

13,398 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Mamdani: And ultimately, I've sought to do that over the course of my life, and especially in a time when the mere mention of being Muslim is seen as if it is a slur. It is also an opportunity for me to introduce the fact that being Muslim is like being a member of any other faith. It is believing and belonging in the notion of equality and in solidarity

Mamdani: And ultimately, I've sought to do that over the course of my life, and especially in a time when the mere mention of being Muslim is seen as if it is a slur. It is also an opportunity for me to introduce the fact that being Muslim is like being a member of any other faith. It is believing and belonging in the notion of equality and in solidarity

Acyn

223,491 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr