Introducing /boost in Google Antigravity. The Antigravity harness can tackle a wide range of tasks right out of the box, but /boost helps if you are tackling particularly complex tasks and are willing to spend some more tokens to push the system to reason deeply about the challenge at... hand. Here is how it works ⬇️show more

/boost tackles complex tasks through a focused multi-agent workflow. Task Routing: The orchestrator analyzes your prompt and dispatches it to a dedicated deep reasoning pipeline tailored for either complex implementation or root-cause investigation. Execution & Verification: Autonomous subagents tackle the problem—implementing solutions, then verifying and improving the changes before presenting the result.

4 key use cases where /boost is particularly effective Tricky bug fixes: Reproducing elusive issues, race conditions, or intermittent test failures with real reproduction tests. Algorithmic optimization: Constructing adversarial boundary cases and stress-testing throughput against formal bounds. Non-trivial refactoring: Modernizing tightly coupled modules with full test coverage and zero caller regressions. Root-cause investigation: Tracing execution call graphs across unfamiliar codebases without modifying files.

Learn more about /boost. Available for Antigravity 2.0 and CLI for Pro and Ultra subscribers.

@rodydavis I will try it now but there is small issue with the bolt icon

The turbo button is back

Please fix the bug first lots of bug is three and crashes randomly

Will it ask for permissions every fucking second when running a simple command?

Is this the same as /Teamwork-preview?

I would use the Claude desktop app over Antigravity 100% of the time.

the best version of /boost won't be a command. run cheap first, then escalate only when verification finds a concrete failure. complexity is a bad trigger. evidence that the cheap pass failed is a good one.

Who ever wrote this post did a bad job, everyone is confused about the usefulness of /boost and what it replaces

while using opus in anti gravity ,it contijuesly says servers r overloaded

/bolt boost is showing error: failed to resolve components: unknown component: tool "skill_ search" not found in registry @antigravity.. how to resolve this?

Guys, Don't carrlessly run it. The subagents, even the main agent itself Gaslight af. Subagents hallucinates success and reports to main agaent without prove and main agaent will build on it creating more garbage and mess up your codebase.

But will it make it as good as Sol 5.6? I asked Gemini and Sol both to build me a website mock up for a website for my stepnson to sell his 3d prints and thr difference is staggering

How is this different from/teamwork-preview

I'm a bit slow What's the difference between this , goal and teamwork Teamwork uses a bunch of agents, but each is managed by a manager that does the planning Boost does deeper planning (compared to what?) Goal, builds loops, but isn't that just execution, QA and replanning ?

What is exactly the difference now between /boost and /goal? Can I use both?

Why would we need this? Can't it reason deeply by default?

Bro I don't think anyone serious uses antigravity wrap it up 😂✌

No plans to update the IDE？

/boost is dead on my account. Every subagent spawn fails instantly: unknown component: tool “skill_search” not found in registry enable-owl-slash-command shipped without enable-skill-search-tool. Repros in IDE and CLI - and in the CLI it fails silently, then answers solo.

Are we ignoring that Google encourages us to spend more tokens? They created @antigravity to entice us with something new and exciting, showcasing their capabilities while excluding the ability to use 3rd party API providers.

Nur eine kurze Frage: Wann kommt Gemini 3.5 Pro ? Ihr liefert im Wochentakt Flash Modelle, aber wir wollen ein ChatGPT 5.6 und Fable/Opus killer ☠️

Ummm how about Gemini 3.7pro?

How to boost if you only have stupid models? Stop boasting

Bro who uses Antigravity after months i tried it once again on a tight scope to build a simple prototype. Guess what happened? I have been requesting all along as long as ship your models in this harness no one will use it.

are y'all going to add this to the IDE? (The better antigravity interface)

CLI is blazing fast 🚀

Complex reasoning huh.... don't u think u r a little late for this?

So, we need to pay more for do the job? 🤔

Use Gemini 3.7 only for UI/UX(frontends). !! DONT USE IT FOR LOGICS AND FUNCTIONS. Let Claude Models(opus) or Moonshot Kimi-k3 handle your codebase

Why not just launch an xhigh/ultra version instead?

I didn't find it on antigravity ide

yo fix the logo its pretty slick though