Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Introducing Vals-Smith: turn your code base into a customized benchmark. Public benchmarks tell you which model is strongest overall, not which model is the best on your code. Vals-Smith turns your merged pull requests into real coding tasks and measures the percentage a model can actually resolve. New models...

46,847 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

28 Kommentare

Profilbild von Vals AI
Vals AIvor 3 Monaten

Join the waitlist today!

Profilbild von Rayan Krishnan
Rayan Krishnanvor 3 Monaten

props to @OfirPress @jyangballin @KLieret for laying a lot of the ground work. by default we evaluate all models with mini swe agent, methodology is heavily swe bench inspired

Profilbild von Jerry Liu
Jerry Liuvor 3 Monaten

congrats on the launch!!

Profilbild von Gabriel Stengel
Gabriel Stengelvor 3 Monaten

Congrats @RayanKrishnan on the launch!

Profilbild von Rez Havaei
Rez Havaeivor 3 Monaten

Great work!

Profilbild von Aryo Patel
Aryo Patelvor 3 Monaten

Awesome release -- can't wait to try it out code speed about to double

Profilbild von Jihoon
Jihoonvor 3 Monaten

i had this idea for months and these days its great, you just have to wait because good ideas end up getting implemented thanks!

Profilbild von Braeden Norris
Braeden Norrisvor 3 Monaten

Super cool launch, congrats!

Profilbild von Inflectiv AI ⧉
Inflectiv AI ⧉vor 3 Monaten

🔥🔥

Profilbild von 安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB
安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNBvor 3 Monaten

拿自己仓库测,比看榜单踏实多了

Profilbild von Ronak Malde
Ronak Maldevor 3 Monaten

This is very exciting!!

Profilbild von icosaedro
icosaedrovor 3 Monaten

PRs as the benchmark set is the only metric that matters. Generic evals lie.

Profilbild von Sumer Sao
Sumer Saovor 3 Monaten

congrats guys!

Profilbild von Jason Zhao
Jason Zhaovor 3 Monaten

Awesome stuff

Profilbild von Rona Wang
Rona Wangvor 3 Monaten

🚀

Profilbild von Vivek Gopalan
Vivek Gopalanvor 3 Monaten

Really important

Profilbild von Moritz Stephan
Moritz Stephanvor 3 Monaten

this is awesome

Profilbild von Daniel Rabinovich
Daniel Rabinovichvor 3 Monaten

This is really cool!

Profilbild von Faraz
Farazvor 3 Monaten

Really cool work @RayanKrishnan !!

Profilbild von Dhruv Mangtani
Dhruv Mangtanivor 3 Monaten

sounds expensive lol

Profilbild von Sergey Karayev
Sergey Karayevvor 3 Monaten

repo-specific evals are the way. we built this into @Superconductor too, and you can run your own on merged PRs today no waitlist:

Profilbild von Dhruvik Parikh 🌎
Dhruvik Parikh 🌎vor 3 Monaten

🔥🔥🔥

Profilbild von shyamal
shyamalvor 3 Monaten

congrats on the launch!

Profilbild von iTokens.io ⚡️ AI API
iTokens.io ⚡️ AI APIvor 3 Monaten

This feels like the direction coding evaluation is heading. The most useful benchmark isn't the one that ranks models globally—it's the one built from your own workflows and codebase.

Profilbild von Jihoon
Jihoonvor 3 Monaten

@grok competitor landscape in both closed and open source

Profilbild von RAZA | AI EXPLORER
RAZA | AI EXPLORERvor 3 Monaten

Measuring performance on your own code is a game-changer. Love this.

Profilbild von Lucas Campa
Lucas Campavor 3 Monaten

Looks awesome 🚀🚀

Profilbild von Panizzutti
Panizzuttivor 3 Monaten

I like this but vibe coded video

Ähnliche Videos

Fusion Models by robinhood:0xa92768863a55d8a0591709f7f5e594a249d36ea3, explained properly. Why a panel beats one model: Ask three models the same hard question and they disagree. The disagreement is the information, where they contradict each other is where one of them is wrong, and a judge can see it. OpenRouter shipped exactly this in June and their panels beat any single frontier model. Credit to them and their $10B sale to stripe. Why the same panel for everyone is the wrong shape: You don't have one best model. You have a best model per job. The one you trust for code is not the one you trust for writing, and neither is the one you'd pick for a five-line reply. A panel chosen per request, identical for every user, can't know that. A panel arranged around you can. The number that matters isn't price: It's cost per answer that works. Model A costs $4 per million tokens and gets your job right one time in four. Model B costs $10 and gets it right three times in four. Per answer you actually keep, A costs $16 and B costs $13. The cheap model was the expensive one. Everyone comparing price lists is measuring the wrong thing. You never rate anything: Stopping an answer halfway is a rating. Regenerating is a rating. Switching model and asking again is the loudest rating there is. Every one of those already writes a row we can learn from. The router learns which models earn your credits, per job, and tries a cheaper one now and then to check. Fusion only when it pays: Cost mode tries the cheap model first and escalates only if a judge says it failed. Performance mode fans out to your panel and merges. Most simple prompts never fuse. That's why it costs less, not more. Put it together and you have a personal model: Not trained. Assembled. Your profile from a two-minute questionnaire and everything you've imported from Claude or ChatGPT. Your memory, shared across every model so switching never starts from zero. Your skills, workflows you build once and run on any model. Your scorecard, which models earn your credits per job. One per person. Nobody else has yours. Every model is someone else's; the arrangement is you, and it leaves with you. People aren't loyal to models. They're loyal to results. A moat can't be a commodity, but it can be our own creation.

askr

13,900 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

We’re launching Optima. Now anyone can create a custom benchmark for their use case, leveraging Artificial Analysis’ leading research and platform Building and running benchmarks is difficult. We have distilled Artificial Analysis’ research and experience developing benchmarks into Optima, a new platform for benchmarking models on your own workloads and comparing performance, speed and cost efficiency. Optima allows you to find the best model for your task, or an equally performant alternative to your current setup at 10x lower cost or time per task. We’ve integrated Artificial Analysis' research and experience in benchmarks across the Optima workflow: ➤ Build benchmarks based on your own data and use cases: There are three ways to build a benchmark with Optima. Upload an existing evaluation dataset from your own files or Hugging Face, or import agent traces from platforms including Arize AI, Braintrust and langfuse.com. Install the Optima skill to build a benchmark using context from your coding environment and previous sessions. Or simply describe your use case and provide example inputs and outputs, and Optima will build the benchmark for you ➤ Run across the latest models: Run the same benchmark across leading models in a single click, and keep your leaderboard up to date as soon as new models are released ➤ Bring Artificial Analysis grading to your own benchmark: Evaluate responses against objective rubric criteria or using the same pairwise judging approach used for Artificial Analysis benchmarks including GDPval-AA and AA-Briefcase. For pairwise judging, select your preferred responses from a sample and Optima uses those preferences to rank models across your test set ➤ Compare performance, cost and time efficiency: Optima measures more than model performance. Cost per Task and Time per Task are tracked alongside benchmark scores, with category-level results and support for custom metrics, allowing you to compare the tradeoffs between models for your specific use case Ahead of launch, here are examples questions our beta testers answered with Optima: ➤ Which model can save me 10x the cost without a meaningful decrease in quality for my finance & accounting agent? ➤ Which model best matches the writing style of lawyers for my legal agent? ➤ Which model can best identify different elements in my custom image dataset? Optima is available today. Build your own benchmark at

Artificial Analysis

133,793 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten