Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Iran’s increasing aggression and rapid ballistic missile development presented a clear and imminent threat that demanded decisive action. The President acted fully within his authority under the law, and consistent with the precedent set by presidents for the past four decades. Efforts now to restrict the Commander in Chief... show more

Speaker Mike Johnson

1,230,904 subscribers

239,646 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

In striking Iran, President Donald J. Trump acted completely within his authority as Commander in Chief under Article II Section II of the Constitution. The admin briefed Members of Congress ahead of the campaign and provided congressional notification for the operation. For decades, presidents of both parties have made the same call, including when President Obama acted in Libya. Let’s be honest about the facts.

In striking Iran, President Donald J. Trump acted completely within his authority as Commander in Chief under Article II Section II of the Constitution. The admin briefed Members of Congress ahead of the campaign and provided congressional notification for the operation. For decades, presidents of both parties have made the same call, including when President Obama acted in Libya. Let’s be honest about the facts.

Senator Dave McCormick

31,128 views • 6 months ago

Operation Epic Fury was a defensive and decisive action taken to counter the imminent threat posed by Iran’s aggression toward American troops, citizens, installations, and assets. Our intelligence confirmed that inaction would have resulted in dire consequences. We continue to pray for our troops while they carry out this limited but critical mission.

Operation Epic Fury was a defensive and decisive action taken to counter the imminent threat posed by Iran’s aggression toward American troops, citizens, installations, and assets. Our intelligence confirmed that inaction would have resulted in dire consequences. We continue to pray for our troops while they carry out this limited but critical mission.

Speaker Mike Johnson

371,966 views • 6 months ago

This is not a time for political theater. President Donald J. Trump acted fully within his constitutional authority, just as past presidents from both parties have done for decades. It’s time for a united America to support our brave soldiers and lock arms with our allies in confronting the Iranian regime.

This is not a time for political theater. President Donald J. Trump acted fully within his constitutional authority, just as past presidents from both parties have done for decades. It’s time for a united America to support our brave soldiers and lock arms with our allies in confronting the Iranian regime.

Senator Dave McCormick

24,302 views • 6 months ago

Iran is the greatest state sponsor of terrorism. The president has the responsibility, as commander-in-chief, to protect our country, our interests abroad, and at home. For Congress to take action to restrict his ability to protect this country from known adversaries is dangerous and contrary to positions that democrats have taken in the past.

Iran is the greatest state sponsor of terrorism. The president has the responsibility, as commander-in-chief, to protect our country, our interests abroad, and at home. For Congress to take action to restrict his ability to protect this country from known adversaries is dangerous and contrary to positions that democrats have taken in the past.

Congressman Mike Lawler

36,025 views • 6 months ago

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte PRAISES President Trump for decisive action in Iran, calling it “CRUCIAL” for the entire world if reports that Iran can strike as far as Diego Garcia are confirmed. RUTTE: “We are looking into that. But if this would be true, it is the more evidence what the president is doing here, taking out the ballistic missile capability, taking out the nuclear capability from Iran, is crucial.” “And exactly as the ambassador just said, Ambassador Waltz, we have seen with North Korea if we negotiate for too long, you might pass the moment when you can still get things done and North Korea now has the nuclear capability.” “If Iran would have the nuclear capability including together with missile capability, it would be a direct threat to Israel and to the region and to Europe and to the stability in the world.” “So the president doing this is crucial.” “And I have seen the polling. But I really hope the American people will be with him because he is doing this to make the whole world safer.”

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte PRAISES President Trump for decisive action in Iran, calling it “CRUCIAL” for the entire world if reports that Iran can strike as far as Diego Garcia are confirmed. RUTTE: “We are looking into that. But if this would be true, it is the more evidence what the president is doing here, taking out the ballistic missile capability, taking out the nuclear capability from Iran, is crucial.” “And exactly as the ambassador just said, Ambassador Waltz, we have seen with North Korea if we negotiate for too long, you might pass the moment when you can still get things done and North Korea now has the nuclear capability.” “If Iran would have the nuclear capability including together with missile capability, it would be a direct threat to Israel and to the region and to Europe and to the stability in the world.” “So the president doing this is crucial.” “And I have seen the polling. But I really hope the American people will be with him because he is doing this to make the whole world safer.”

Overton

50,113 views • 5 months ago

Iran’s missiles posed a real and dangerous threat to the United States. I commend President Trump for taking bold, decisive action to defend our homeland.

Iran’s missiles posed a real and dangerous threat to the United States. I commend President Trump for taking bold, decisive action to defend our homeland.

Tom Cotton

64,172 views • 6 months ago

“This was our last best chance to strike at what we're doing right now, and eliminate the intolerable threats posed by this sick and sinister regime,” President Trump said in his first public remarks on the joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran, and claimed the U.S. was “very nearly under threat” by Iran’s ballistic missiles and pursuit of nuclear weapons. “The regime's conventional ballistic missile program was growing rapidly and dramatically, and this posed a very clear, colossal threat to America and our forces stationed overseas,” Trump said.

“This was our last best chance to strike at what we're doing right now, and eliminate the intolerable threats posed by this sick and sinister regime,” President Trump said in his first public remarks on the joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran, and claimed the U.S. was “very nearly under threat” by Iran’s ballistic missiles and pursuit of nuclear weapons. “The regime's conventional ballistic missile program was growing rapidly and dramatically, and this posed a very clear, colossal threat to America and our forces stationed overseas,” Trump said.

CBS News

40,193 views • 6 months ago

President Trump was well within his constitutional authorities as Commander in Chief under Art. II authorities. The Iranian regime posed a direct and imminent threat to national security and American interests, murdered 40,000+ innocent Iranians, and was advancing its nuclear capabilities.

President Trump was well within his constitutional authorities as Commander in Chief under Art. II authorities. The Iranian regime posed a direct and imminent threat to national security and American interests, murdered 40,000+ innocent Iranians, and was advancing its nuclear capabilities.

Cory Mills

28,465 views • 6 months ago

“Trump didn’t want this fight — but he saw an imminent threat and acted.” Charlie Hurt: After decades of failed proxy wars, Trump chose to “cut the head of the snake off” — a precise campaign, clear objectives, and now a path to exit. No endless wars. No confusion about the mission.

“Trump didn’t want this fight — but he saw an imminent threat and acted.” Charlie Hurt: After decades of failed proxy wars, Trump chose to “cut the head of the snake off” — a precise campaign, clear objectives, and now a path to exit. No endless wars. No confusion about the mission.

Laura Ingraham

38,797 views • 5 months ago

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) says he stands by the 2025 Annual Threat Assessment by U.S. intelligence leaders who testified at the time that Iran had not reauthorized their nuclear weapons program. “There was no imminent threat to the United States, and I don't believe there was even an imminent threat to Israel from Iran,” he tells Margaret Brennan. “Over a period of time, particularly with the ballistic missile capability, Israel would be more under threat. The decision to go to war in this case was a choice by President Trump.”

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) says he stands by the 2025 Annual Threat Assessment by U.S. intelligence leaders who testified at the time that Iran had not reauthorized their nuclear weapons program. “There was no imminent threat to the United States, and I don't believe there was even an imminent threat to Israel from Iran,” he tells Margaret Brennan. “Over a period of time, particularly with the ballistic missile capability, Israel would be more under threat. The decision to go to war in this case was a choice by President Trump.”

Face The Nation

24,868 views • 5 months ago

I’m setting the record straight on the War Powers Act, the Constitution, and the President’s authority as Commander-in-Chief. Politicians keep claiming the President must ask Congress before acting in a military crisis — but the Constitution says otherwise. Congress can declare war, but the President commands the military and protects the nation. In the middle of a major campaign against a dangerous regime, some in Washington are trying to weaponize the War Powers Act to block the Commander-in-Chief. I explain why presidents from both parties have rejected it, why the Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and why this debate matters for national security, constitutional authority, and America’s leadership in the world. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

I’m setting the record straight on the War Powers Act, the Constitution, and the President’s authority as Commander-in-Chief. Politicians keep claiming the President must ask Congress before acting in a military crisis — but the Constitution says otherwise. Congress can declare war, but the President commands the military and protects the nation. In the middle of a major campaign against a dangerous regime, some in Washington are trying to weaponize the War Powers Act to block the Commander-in-Chief. I explain why presidents from both parties have rejected it, why the Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and why this debate matters for national security, constitutional authority, and America’s leadership in the world. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

52,174 views • 5 months ago

Yellowstone creator Taylor Sheridan perfectly encapsulates how the left’s refusal to accept Donald Trump as president is actively eroding the rule of law. He warns that they are setting a very dangerous precedent for the future of America. SHERIDAN: “It’s so dangerous what we’re seeing.” “You can like Trump or not like Trump, it doesn’t...people are going to like presidents and dislike presidents.” “But now, defying the rule of law because he happens to be the head of the federal government and openly defying the government.” “The repercussions of that are going to be, okay, fine, you can’t stand this man, you think he’s a terrible president and you’re not going to follow his laws.” “But that’s the new normal now.” “So when a president gets in that you do support, then the other side — because we’ve established this precedent — they’re just not going to follow his laws either.” “And now we’ve eroded the rule of law.” “And then what happens?”

Yellowstone creator Taylor Sheridan perfectly encapsulates how the left’s refusal to accept Donald Trump as president is actively eroding the rule of law. He warns that they are setting a very dangerous precedent for the future of America. SHERIDAN: “It’s so dangerous what we’re seeing.” “You can like Trump or not like Trump, it doesn’t...people are going to like presidents and dislike presidents.” “But now, defying the rule of law because he happens to be the head of the federal government and openly defying the government.” “The repercussions of that are going to be, okay, fine, you can’t stand this man, you think he’s a terrible president and you’re not going to follow his laws.” “But that’s the new normal now.” “So when a president gets in that you do support, then the other side — because we’ve established this precedent — they’re just not going to follow his laws either.” “And now we’ve eroded the rule of law.” “And then what happens?”

Overton

374,933 views • 2 months ago

Speaking at the Emergency #ArabIslamicSummit in #Doha, Syrian President Ahmad Al-Shar’a said that Israel had set a dangerous precedent by targeting both negotiators and the mediator state itself. He condemned Israel’s continued assaults on Gaza and Syria, and affirmed his country’s full solidarity with Qatar in its stance against Israeli aggression.

Speaking at the Emergency #ArabIslamicSummit in #Doha, Syrian President Ahmad Al-Shar’a said that Israel had set a dangerous precedent by targeting both negotiators and the mediator state itself. He condemned Israel’s continued assaults on Gaza and Syria, and affirmed his country’s full solidarity with Qatar in its stance against Israeli aggression.

Muhammad Saad

86,273 views • 11 months ago

BREAKING: Oversight Democrats demand that Donald Trump be brought in to testify under oath about the Epstein Files cover-up. Robert Garcia moments ago: “Republicans have now set a new precedent. To bring in presidents and former presidents to testify… We are now asking and demanding that President Trump officially come in and testify before the Oversight committee.”

BREAKING: Oversight Democrats demand that Donald Trump be brought in to testify under oath about the Epstein Files cover-up. Robert Garcia moments ago: “Republicans have now set a new precedent. To bring in presidents and former presidents to testify… We are now asking and demanding that President Trump officially come in and testify before the Oversight committee.”

Ed Krassenstein

35,618 views • 6 months ago

Rand Paul: "Really, the debate now should be, is a 47 year old conflict an imminent threat? Were there changes in their nuclear program that made this an imminent threat? And I don't think the evidence is there that this was an imminent threat that would allow the president to go to war on his own."

Rand Paul: "Really, the debate now should be, is a 47 year old conflict an imminent threat? Were there changes in their nuclear program that made this an imminent threat? And I don't think the evidence is there that this was an imminent threat that would allow the president to go to war on his own."

Aaron Rupar

228,697 views • 4 months ago

When the national interest is at stake, the President must be able to take decisive executive action—and President Trump has both the authority and the courage to do it. That’s why he is our Commander-in-Chief. He sees the threat clearly. He understands this is a national security crisis, not a political talking point. And he’s prepared to act accordingly. And when you have thousands of unvetted individuals pouring across our border, any responsible leader would use every constitutional tool available to shut it down.

When the national interest is at stake, the President must be able to take decisive executive action—and President Trump has both the authority and the courage to do it. That’s why he is our Commander-in-Chief. He sees the threat clearly. He understands this is a national security crisis, not a political talking point. And he’s prepared to act accordingly. And when you have thousands of unvetted individuals pouring across our border, any responsible leader would use every constitutional tool available to shut it down.

Wesley Hunt

14,690 views • 9 months ago

THE SPEEDWAY SLAMMER. Under 287g authority, state and local law enforcement can now assist with immigration functions, including: arrests, transportation, and detention. 287g is a force multiplier in completing the President’s mission and making America SAFE again.

THE SPEEDWAY SLAMMER. Under 287g authority, state and local law enforcement can now assist with immigration functions, including: arrests, transportation, and detention. 287g is a force multiplier in completing the President’s mission and making America SAFE again.

Homeland Security

53,909 views • 1 year ago

Prime Minister Netanyahu says swift action was necessary to stop Iran from making its nuclear and missile programs untouchable, praising President Trump for taking decisive action: “The reason that we had to act now is because they were. After we hit their nuclear sites and their ballistic missile program, you’d think they learned a lesson, but they didn’t because they’re unreformable. They’re totally fanatical about this—about the goal of destroying America. So they started building new sites, new places, underground bunkers that would make their ballistic missile program and their atomic bomb program immune within months. If no action was taken now, no action could be taken in the future. And then they could target America. They could blackmail America. They could threaten us and threaten everyone in between. So action had to be taken. And you needed a resolute president like Donald J. Trump to take that action.”

Prime Minister Netanyahu says swift action was necessary to stop Iran from making its nuclear and missile programs untouchable, praising President Trump for taking decisive action: “The reason that we had to act now is because they were. After we hit their nuclear sites and their ballistic missile program, you’d think they learned a lesson, but they didn’t because they’re unreformable. They’re totally fanatical about this—about the goal of destroying America. So they started building new sites, new places, underground bunkers that would make their ballistic missile program and their atomic bomb program immune within months. If no action was taken now, no action could be taken in the future. And then they could target America. They could blackmail America. They could threaten us and threaten everyone in between. So action had to be taken. And you needed a resolute president like Donald J. Trump to take that action.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

111,706 views • 6 months ago