正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Jordan Peterson says intelligence and being a good person have zero correlation "there's no correlation between morality and intelligence. Like literally none" "conscientious people can keep long-term contracts. They tend to abide by their word. The correlation between conscientiousness and IQ is zero. Zero, right? Which is quite remarkable"... show more

Toan Truong

40,122 subscribers

45,171 次观看 • 20 天前 •via X (Twitter)

教育健康养生新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Jordan Peterson says a famous US program proved you cannot give kids a lasting IQ boost, even with early enrichment "there was a huge program in the United States started in the 1960s which was supported by conservatives and liberals alike called Head Start" "the kids who went to Head Start did do better than their age matched and socioeconomic matched peers who didn't go to Head Start, but the differences disappeared by grade five or grade six" "so there was no improvement in cognitive function" "that was really saddening... because it was a good hypothesis. Like the idea that you could get a leap ahead early seems so obvious that you'd think it was incontrovertible. It just happens not to be true" If you're new here, follow Toan Truong for the sharpest lessons from the world's best minds. — Jordan B Peterson ( Dr Jordan B Peterson ), clinical psychologist, on Jordan B Peterson's ( Dr Jordan B Peterson ) Answer the Call

Jordan Peterson says a famous US program proved you cannot give kids a lasting IQ boost, even with early enrichment "there was a huge program in the United States started in the 1960s which was supported by conservatives and liberals alike called Head Start" "the kids who went to Head Start did do better than their age matched and socioeconomic matched peers who didn't go to Head Start, but the differences disappeared by grade five or grade six" "so there was no improvement in cognitive function" "that was really saddening... because it was a good hypothesis. Like the idea that you could get a leap ahead early seems so obvious that you'd think it was incontrovertible. It just happens not to be true" If you're new here, follow Toan Truong for the sharpest lessons from the world's best minds. — Jordan B Peterson ( Dr Jordan B Peterson ), clinical psychologist, on Jordan B Peterson's ( Dr Jordan B Peterson ) Answer the Call

Toan Truong

181,572 次观看 • 1 个月前

People with high conscientiousness tend to get better grades in school and earn more money—even when you control for IQ. So if you have two people with the same score on an intelligence test, the person with higher conscientiousness will likely go on to get better grades and have higher earnings. There's also a very small but significant inverse correlation between intelligence and conscientiousness. In other words, the higher you go in intelligence, the lower your conscientiousness score tends to be. It's a very small effect, but it seems to be driven largely by the orderliness aspect of conscientiousness. Some psychologists have suggested there's a compensatory mechanism at work here. Very intelligent people can afford to be less organized because they're able to use their intelligence to compensate for their lack of diligence and focus. Meanwhile, people who are relatively less intelligent are forced to be more orderly to compensate for their lack of intellectual aptitude. Relatedly, men with spouses who score higher on conscientiousness tend to earn more money, even when their own level of conscientiousness is controlled for.

People with high conscientiousness tend to get better grades in school and earn more money—even when you control for IQ. So if you have two people with the same score on an intelligence test, the person with higher conscientiousness will likely go on to get better grades and have higher earnings. There's also a very small but significant inverse correlation between intelligence and conscientiousness. In other words, the higher you go in intelligence, the lower your conscientiousness score tends to be. It's a very small effect, but it seems to be driven largely by the orderliness aspect of conscientiousness. Some psychologists have suggested there's a compensatory mechanism at work here. Very intelligent people can afford to be less organized because they're able to use their intelligence to compensate for their lack of diligence and focus. Meanwhile, people who are relatively less intelligent are forced to be more orderly to compensate for their lack of intellectual aptitude. Relatedly, men with spouses who score higher on conscientiousness tend to earn more money, even when their own level of conscientiousness is controlled for.

Rob Henderson

39,860 次观看 • 8 个月前

The newest course on Peterson Academy, Dr John Vervaeke's nine-hour course: Introduction to Intelligence is available now. Enroll now for immediate access at Peterson Academy. In this course, Dr. Vervaeke explores the nature of intelligence through a comprehensive cognitive science lens, examining theories from traditional computational models to modern neuroscientific frameworks. The course integrates multiple perspectives, including cognitive science, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence, with a focus on relevance realization and predictive processing as key mechanisms underlying general intelligence. We investigate how intelligence emerges from the dynamic interaction between brain architecture, cognitive processes, and environmental coupling, addressing challenges in natural and artificial intelligence. The course concludes by exploring the implications of these theories for understanding consciousness, collective intelligence, and the future of artificial general intelligence.

The newest course on Peterson Academy, Dr John Vervaeke's nine-hour course: Introduction to Intelligence is available now. Enroll now for immediate access at Peterson Academy. In this course, Dr. Vervaeke explores the nature of intelligence through a comprehensive cognitive science lens, examining theories from traditional computational models to modern neuroscientific frameworks. The course integrates multiple perspectives, including cognitive science, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence, with a focus on relevance realization and predictive processing as key mechanisms underlying general intelligence. We investigate how intelligence emerges from the dynamic interaction between brain architecture, cognitive processes, and environmental coupling, addressing challenges in natural and artificial intelligence. The course concludes by exploring the implications of these theories for understanding consciousness, collective intelligence, and the future of artificial general intelligence.

Peterson Academy

170,474 次观看 • 1 年前

Jordan Peterson hit hard: “People with extreme high IQs are so much more productive than people on the lower end… they’re not even in the same universe.” But here’s the part that matters most: IQ has nothing to do with morality. Being smarter doesn’t make you better. In fact, Peterson warns there’s a real “Luciferian temptation” that comes with high intelligence — the arrogant belief that your superior mind gives you the right to impose your systems and values on everyone else. We all have the same intrinsic human value. In a world that worships intelligence and status, remembering that smarts and goodness are completely separate traits is crucial. I’ve seen brilliant people do ugly things and “average” people show incredible moral strength. What do you think — does high intelligence actually make someone more prone to arrogance and moral blind spots, or is that just a stereotype?

Jordan Peterson hit hard: “People with extreme high IQs are so much more productive than people on the lower end… they’re not even in the same universe.” But here’s the part that matters most: IQ has nothing to do with morality. Being smarter doesn’t make you better. In fact, Peterson warns there’s a real “Luciferian temptation” that comes with high intelligence — the arrogant belief that your superior mind gives you the right to impose your systems and values on everyone else. We all have the same intrinsic human value. In a world that worships intelligence and status, remembering that smarts and goodness are completely separate traits is crucial. I’ve seen brilliant people do ugly things and “average” people show incredible moral strength. What do you think — does high intelligence actually make someone more prone to arrogance and moral blind spots, or is that just a stereotype?

Camus

444,335 次观看 • 3 个月前

“Their answer is call me a climate change denier, try to smear me. But they can't answer the argument of, ‘look at the full context benefits and side effects of what's good for human flourishing.’” With Dr Jordan B Peterson

“Their answer is call me a climate change denier, try to smear me. But they can't answer the argument of, ‘look at the full context benefits and side effects of what's good for human flourishing.’” With Dr Jordan B Peterson

Alex Epstein

173,502 次观看 • 3 年前

HODGES: Russia's enjoying and revelling in the fact that there's zero pressure from United States on them to do anything. Instead, sanctions have been lifted on Russian oil. There are zero repercussions from United States for intelligence and aid Russia's providing to Iran, which is targeting American troops and our partners in the region. Zero consequences for them for that.

HODGES: Russia's enjoying and revelling in the fact that there's zero pressure from United States on them to do anything. Instead, sanctions have been lifted on Russian oil. There are zero repercussions from United States for intelligence and aid Russia's providing to Iran, which is targeting American troops and our partners in the region. Zero consequences for them for that.

Kate from Kharkiv

13,935 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk on Neuralink's long-term goal: “In the short term, Neuralink is just about solving brain injuries and spinal injuries, that kind of thing. So, to be clear, for many years, Neuralink products will just be helpful to someone who has lost the use of their arms or arms and legs or who has a traumatic brain injury of some kind... There's a long-term mitigation to artificial intelligence, which is that we could effectively merge with artificial intelligence by improving the speed of interaction between our cortex and our tertiary layer, which is already silicon. We're already sort of a three-level intelligence creature.”

Elon Musk on Neuralink's long-term goal: “In the short term, Neuralink is just about solving brain injuries and spinal injuries, that kind of thing. So, to be clear, for many years, Neuralink products will just be helpful to someone who has lost the use of their arms or arms and legs or who has a traumatic brain injury of some kind... There's a long-term mitigation to artificial intelligence, which is that we could effectively merge with artificial intelligence by improving the speed of interaction between our cortex and our tertiary layer, which is already silicon. We're already sort of a three-level intelligence creature.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

469,134 次观看 • 8 个月前

Jordan Peterson on why writing is the most powerful skill you can learn: 1. writing and thinking are the same thing. there is no difference between them. when you learn to write clearly you are not learning to express thoughts you already have. you are learning to have the thoughts in the first place. 2. universities never tell students why they are writing. the answer they get is you need the grade. the real answer is you need to learn to think. because thinking is what makes you act effectively in the world and win the battles you choose to fight. 3. if you can think, speak, and write you are absolutely dangerous. people give you money. they give you opportunities. you have influence. peterson says nothing can get in your way. that is what you are at university for. 4. the most articulate person in the room always wins the argument. peterson has watched staggeringly successful people his whole life. the common thread: you do not want to argue with them. not because they are aggressive. because their points are organized and yours probably aren't. 5. someone who cannot write has done almost everything wrong before they start. wrong words, wrong sentences, wrong paragraph order, wrong structure, wrong conclusion. peterson says marking a bad essay is agony because the answer to what did i do wrong is essentially everything.

Jordan Peterson on why writing is the most powerful skill you can learn: 1. writing and thinking are the same thing. there is no difference between them. when you learn to write clearly you are not learning to express thoughts you already have. you are learning to have the thoughts in the first place. 2. universities never tell students why they are writing. the answer they get is you need the grade. the real answer is you need to learn to think. because thinking is what makes you act effectively in the world and win the battles you choose to fight. 3. if you can think, speak, and write you are absolutely dangerous. people give you money. they give you opportunities. you have influence. peterson says nothing can get in your way. that is what you are at university for. 4. the most articulate person in the room always wins the argument. peterson has watched staggeringly successful people his whole life. the common thread: you do not want to argue with them. not because they are aggressive. because their points are organized and yours probably aren't. 5. someone who cannot write has done almost everything wrong before they start. wrong words, wrong sentences, wrong paragraph order, wrong structure, wrong conclusion. peterson says marking a bad essay is agony because the answer to what did i do wrong is essentially everything.

Jaynit

104,964 次观看 • 1 个月前

In this 2018 interview with John Anderson, Dr Jordan B Peterson spoke through tears about a simple, haunting truth: how little encouragement some people need to turn their lives around and how rarely they receive it. Following the recent update from Mikhaila Peterson regarding Jordan’s health and his battle with akathisia and neurological injury, these words feel more poignant than ever. Jordan has spent years pouring encouragement into the lives of millions; now, we want to send that same strength back to him. John and the entire team here are praying for our friend Jordan and the Peterson family during this incredibly difficult season. If you are people of prayer, we ask you to do the same. #jordanpeterson #akathisiaawareness #prayerworks #prayer

In this 2018 interview with John Anderson, Dr Jordan B Peterson spoke through tears about a simple, haunting truth: how little encouragement some people need to turn their lives around and how rarely they receive it. Following the recent update from Mikhaila Peterson regarding Jordan’s health and his battle with akathisia and neurological injury, these words feel more poignant than ever. Jordan has spent years pouring encouragement into the lives of millions; now, we want to send that same strength back to him. John and the entire team here are praying for our friend Jordan and the Peterson family during this incredibly difficult season. If you are people of prayer, we ask you to do the same. #jordanpeterson #akathisiaawareness #prayerworks #prayer

John Anderson AC

482,278 次观看 • 3 个月前

#1 - “Not everyone got the same thing.” In an interview with Mel K, Dr. Zelenko said, “Some of the lots were 5,000% more lethal than others — or think of it as 50x. So, let’s say one vial killed one person. Another vial killed 50 people.” “If everyone would have gotten the same thing, it would be a clear correlation that you’re being poisoned, and no one would take it,” Dr. Zelenko concluded. Thus, the answer to why some people took the shot and turned out okay is because “not everyone got the same thing.”

#1 - “Not everyone got the same thing.” In an interview with Mel K, Dr. Zelenko said, “Some of the lots were 5,000% more lethal than others — or think of it as 50x. So, let’s say one vial killed one person. Another vial killed 50 people.” “If everyone would have gotten the same thing, it would be a clear correlation that you’re being poisoned, and no one would take it,” Dr. Zelenko concluded. Thus, the answer to why some people took the shot and turned out okay is because “not everyone got the same thing.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

315,871 次观看 • 2 年前

Liquid AI (Liquid AI) CEO Ramin Hasani (Ramin) says: "We're bringing the cost of tokens to zero." "The axis was maximizing intelligence at all costs." Foundation models need to optimize across 3 axes: 1.) Intelligence and capability 2.) Efficiency and cost 3.) Substrate: where the intelligence actually runs "Efficiency is not an afterthought. Energy is not abundant." "If you maximize intelligence at all costs, that axis alone is not going to get you to the place that you want to go." "Efficiency and cost of intelligence as a first-class citizen, and not an afterthought." "Where does this intelligence system go? AI is majorly getting hosted in data centers, but you could also bring intelligence on phones, on laptops, on airplanes, on cars." "Imagine if it's not tokens that are actually important. It's just the outcome that actually matters." "Not just thinking about foundation models as the token machines that are generating money and revenue for the foundation model companies that are useless tokens, and getting them into the place where they can actually unlock true value for enterprises."

Liquid AI (Liquid AI) CEO Ramin Hasani (Ramin) says: "We're bringing the cost of tokens to zero." "The axis was maximizing intelligence at all costs." Foundation models need to optimize across 3 axes: 1.) Intelligence and capability 2.) Efficiency and cost 3.) Substrate: where the intelligence actually runs "Efficiency is not an afterthought. Energy is not abundant." "If you maximize intelligence at all costs, that axis alone is not going to get you to the place that you want to go." "Efficiency and cost of intelligence as a first-class citizen, and not an afterthought." "Where does this intelligence system go? AI is majorly getting hosted in data centers, but you could also bring intelligence on phones, on laptops, on airplanes, on cars." "Imagine if it's not tokens that are actually important. It's just the outcome that actually matters." "Not just thinking about foundation models as the token machines that are generating money and revenue for the foundation model companies that are useless tokens, and getting them into the place where they can actually unlock true value for enterprises."

Molly O’Shea

12,816 次观看 • 1 个月前

This conversation between Dr Jordan B Peterson and James Lindsay, anti-Communist is one of the best I’ve seen in years. If you haven’t watched it yet, I highly recommend it. In addition to talking about the similarities in both ideology and tactics between the Woke Left and Woke Right, they also discuss the psychopathology and resentment that fuels both. They occasionally use scripture as a lens through which to view both kinds of rebellion against God. This part, where they discuss how young women are targeted more heavily by Woke Left and young men are targeted more heavily by Woke Right is especially spot on. It leads into a discussion of the Cain and Abel story. Link to the full talk below.

This conversation between Dr Jordan B Peterson and James Lindsay, anti-Communist is one of the best I’ve seen in years. If you haven’t watched it yet, I highly recommend it. In addition to talking about the similarities in both ideology and tactics between the Woke Left and Woke Right, they also discuss the psychopathology and resentment that fuels both. They occasionally use scripture as a lens through which to view both kinds of rebellion against God. This part, where they discuss how young women are targeted more heavily by Woke Left and young men are targeted more heavily by Woke Right is especially spot on. It leads into a discussion of the Cain and Abel story. Link to the full talk below.

Keri Smith 🌱Deprogrammed

95,895 次观看 • 1 年前

Jordan Peterson: Climate science is "an appalling scam". "We're essentially in a CO2 drought by historical standards... We were almost at the point where the plants were going to start to die." "Now they have been increasing... The major consequences is that the planet is 20% greener than it was in the year 2000... Crop yield has gone up 13%." "It's the opposite of what was predicted, and the opposite was regarded as a catastrophe. Okay, so the opposite of a catastrophe is good—there's more plants and crops grow better. Okay, so what's the problem exactly?" Credit: Dr Jordan B Peterson @Pints_W_Aquinas

Jordan Peterson: Climate science is "an appalling scam". "We're essentially in a CO2 drought by historical standards... We were almost at the point where the plants were going to start to die." "Now they have been increasing... The major consequences is that the planet is 20% greener than it was in the year 2000... Crop yield has gone up 13%." "It's the opposite of what was predicted, and the opposite was regarded as a catastrophe. Okay, so the opposite of a catastrophe is good—there's more plants and crops grow better. Okay, so what's the problem exactly?" Credit: Dr Jordan B Peterson @Pints_W_Aquinas

Wide Awake Media

1,510,781 次观看 • 2 年前

“The First Amendment exists not just so you can hear what I have to say, but humans have a need to SPEAK truth!” It’s true—and it was an honor, and a pleasure, to share my story with Dr Jordan B Peterson We fought the lies for four long years, and now the truth is setting us free 🇺🇸

“The First Amendment exists not just so you can hear what I have to say, but humans have a need to SPEAK truth!” It’s true—and it was an honor, and a pleasure, to share my story with Dr Jordan B Peterson We fought the lies for four long years, and now the truth is setting us free 🇺🇸

Dr. Simone Gold

30,176 次观看 • 1 年前

“There's no one more narcissistic than someone who's smart.” Jordan Peterson delivers a razor-sharp warning in this 32-second clip: Intelligence is a gift — but it comes with a brutal temptation: pride. The smartest people who never achieve what they believe they're owed become the most bitter — convinced the world should have fallen at their feet, resenting everyone when it doesn't. Pride turns brilliance into poison. The higher the IQ, the more spectacular the fall when ego takes control. Peterson: “You can go very spectacularly wrong if you're smart… and it's pride that does that.” In a world full of brilliant but deeply resentful people — this hits like truth serum. Ever met someone incredibly smart who ended up consumed by bitterness? What do you think is the biggest pride trap for high-IQ folks? Clip is short, brutal, and impossible to unhear.

“There's no one more narcissistic than someone who's smart.” Jordan Peterson delivers a razor-sharp warning in this 32-second clip: Intelligence is a gift — but it comes with a brutal temptation: pride. The smartest people who never achieve what they believe they're owed become the most bitter — convinced the world should have fallen at their feet, resenting everyone when it doesn't. Pride turns brilliance into poison. The higher the IQ, the more spectacular the fall when ego takes control. Peterson: “You can go very spectacularly wrong if you're smart… and it's pride that does that.” In a world full of brilliant but deeply resentful people — this hits like truth serum. Ever met someone incredibly smart who ended up consumed by bitterness? What do you think is the biggest pride trap for high-IQ folks? Clip is short, brutal, and impossible to unhear.

Camus

268,410 次观看 • 5 个月前

Delia Ramirez: Some of my colleagues would like to say that there's no correlation between the administration and the Heritage Foundation's plan. Didn't DHS announce on March 7th, 2025, that DHS was ending collective bargaining for TSA officers? McNeill: Yes, it did. Ramirez: When you're acting here like you give a darn about our TSA officers, stop with the hypocrisy.

Delia Ramirez: Some of my colleagues would like to say that there's no correlation between the administration and the Heritage Foundation's plan. Didn't DHS announce on March 7th, 2025, that DHS was ending collective bargaining for TSA officers? McNeill: Yes, it did. Ramirez: When you're acting here like you give a darn about our TSA officers, stop with the hypocrisy.

Blue Georgia

22,236 次观看 • 4 个月前

Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize-winning physicist and mathematician, explains why we should stop calling it AI and start calling it "artificial cleverness": He believes the entire field is mislabelled, and the label itself is doing damage. His objection is simple but cuts deep: "The name is wrong. It's not artificial intelligence. It's not intelligence. Intelligence would involve consciousness. Well, if it's a machine, it's not conscious." For Penrose, people have confused raw computing power with genuine understanding. "People have lost the plot. They've lost it in the power of computing. The thing is that computers have got so powerful that they've lost the thread of what they're doing. But I think consciousness is something different. It's not computational." He believes the term itself has hypnotized people into a category error: "People are so hypnotized. The trouble is that AI is a bad term. It means artificial intelligence. Now intelligence in my view is conscious. That's what intelligence is about." So he proposes a rename. Artificial Cleverness. AC instead of AI. To illustrate the distinction, Penrose draws on his experience teaching mathematics: "You have mathematics students. Some of them understand what they're doing. Some are just clever. They can repeat what they've learned. They know how to do it very cleverly. They can calculate very well, but they don't necessarily understand what they're doing." That gap, between calculating well and actually understanding, is the gap Penrose sees between today's machines and genuine intelligence. Cleverness can be manufactured. Consciousness, in his view, cannot. So the question worth sitting with: when we call a system "intelligent," are we describing what it does, or quietly assuming something about what it is?

Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize-winning physicist and mathematician, explains why we should stop calling it AI and start calling it "artificial cleverness": He believes the entire field is mislabelled, and the label itself is doing damage. His objection is simple but cuts deep: "The name is wrong. It's not artificial intelligence. It's not intelligence. Intelligence would involve consciousness. Well, if it's a machine, it's not conscious." For Penrose, people have confused raw computing power with genuine understanding. "People have lost the plot. They've lost it in the power of computing. The thing is that computers have got so powerful that they've lost the thread of what they're doing. But I think consciousness is something different. It's not computational." He believes the term itself has hypnotized people into a category error: "People are so hypnotized. The trouble is that AI is a bad term. It means artificial intelligence. Now intelligence in my view is conscious. That's what intelligence is about." So he proposes a rename. Artificial Cleverness. AC instead of AI. To illustrate the distinction, Penrose draws on his experience teaching mathematics: "You have mathematics students. Some of them understand what they're doing. Some are just clever. They can repeat what they've learned. They know how to do it very cleverly. They can calculate very well, but they don't necessarily understand what they're doing." That gap, between calculating well and actually understanding, is the gap Penrose sees between today's machines and genuine intelligence. Cleverness can be manufactured. Consciousness, in his view, cannot. So the question worth sitting with: when we call a system "intelligent," are we describing what it does, or quietly assuming something about what it is?

Big Brain AI

117,778 次观看 • 2 个月前