Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Kicking off my favorite week at Gauntlet AI: Adding significant user-facing features to massive legacy codebases. Older programming languages, versioning issues, convoluted templating, funky CI/CD. AI still must write 100% of the code. Challengers have one week.

Austen Allred

443,928 subscribers

32,953 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Образование Юмор

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Software Engineering Expectations for 2026 - The majority of your code should be written by AI now - Cursor/Codex/Claude Code/Gemini/etc - You should try all the tooling and switch between them, as each one gets an edge over the others depending on the release cycle. - You should be using AI to check the code that is written by AI - Have AI write tests - Have AI read logs - Have AI navigate your browser - I don't do this every time because sometimes it's simple enough to check it myself - You should still skim code changes - This can be a lighter skim on internal tools and a heavier read through on customer facing code - Use AI to help you define specs

Software Engineering Expectations for 2026 - The majority of your code should be written by AI now - Cursor/Codex/Claude Code/Gemini/etc - You should try all the tooling and switch between them, as each one gets an edge over the others depending on the release cycle. - You should be using AI to check the code that is written by AI - Have AI write tests - Have AI read logs - Have AI navigate your browser - I don't do this every time because sometimes it's simple enough to check it myself - You should still skim code changes - This can be a lighter skim on internal tools and a heavier read through on customer facing code - Use AI to help you define specs

Ben Awad

534,705 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Hope you are all having a fantastic start to your week, take a look at the video below, covering a 72 hour water only fast starting at the weekend, why Cbd has become a big part of my natural health journey and more. 100’s of you joined me last time and were so supportive of one another. To find out more about the Cbd I use or to purchase take a look at and receive 40 percent off with my code Tiss40. Have a great week one and all. #wateronlyfast #supremcbd #ad #naturalhealth

Hope you are all having a fantastic start to your week, take a look at the video below, covering a 72 hour water only fast starting at the weekend, why Cbd has become a big part of my natural health journey and more. 100’s of you joined me last time and were so supportive of one another. To find out more about the Cbd I use or to purchase take a look at and receive 40 percent off with my code Tiss40. Have a great week one and all. #wateronlyfast #supremcbd #ad #naturalhealth

Matt Le Tissier ✝️

67,155 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Nobody is writing 90% of their code using AI. Here's the uncomfortable truth: The real productivity gain from using AI to write code is closer to 10%, nowhere near the 90% people claim. Sundar Pichai said in 2024 that 30% of the new code at Google was AI-generated. However, he went on to admit, during Lex Friedman's podcast, that engineering velocity had only increased by about 10%. AI-generated code isn't free code. It still has to be reviewed, tested, and made production-ready. Optimizing a single step (code generation) doesn't boost output if bottlenecks shift elsewhere (code reviews). It doesn't matter how much code you generate if you can't keep up the review process. The solution: Automate as much as you can the review and verification of your code. I'm working with Sonar, who is sponsoring this post, and they will take care of the code quality and security analysis of your code: • They review over 300B lines of code every single day • They cover reliability, security, and maintainability for your code • You can integrate them into your CI/CD pipeline • You can install them in your IDE (I use their VSCode extension) • Support for more than 30 languages Here is a link so you can check them out:

Nobody is writing 90% of their code using AI. Here's the uncomfortable truth: The real productivity gain from using AI to write code is closer to 10%, nowhere near the 90% people claim. Sundar Pichai said in 2024 that 30% of the new code at Google was AI-generated. However, he went on to admit, during Lex Friedman's podcast, that engineering velocity had only increased by about 10%. AI-generated code isn't free code. It still has to be reviewed, tested, and made production-ready. Optimizing a single step (code generation) doesn't boost output if bottlenecks shift elsewhere (code reviews). It doesn't matter how much code you generate if you can't keep up the review process. The solution: Automate as much as you can the review and verification of your code. I'm working with Sonar, who is sponsoring this post, and they will take care of the code quality and security analysis of your code: • They review over 300B lines of code every single day • They cover reliability, security, and maintainability for your code • You can integrate them into your CI/CD pipeline • You can install them in your IDE (I use their VSCode extension) • Support for more than 30 languages Here is a link so you can check them out:

Santiago

296,570 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Day 3 of getting back to building my gamified workout tracker. (have some AI features) I just tested both Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 for the multilingual feature, and Opus 4.8 is still slightly better. It only needed one prompt to solve it. My apps always supports multiple languages because I target multiple markets and don’t want to depend on just one market. Powered by Opus 4.8, Rork, Cursor

Day 3 of getting back to building my gamified workout tracker. (have some AI features) I just tested both Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 for the multilingual feature, and Opus 4.8 is still slightly better. It only needed one prompt to solve it. My apps always supports multiple languages because I target multiple markets and don’t want to depend on just one market. Powered by Opus 4.8, Rork, Cursor

Alex Nguyen

14,428 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Even if AI will write 90% of code. But it won’t replace engineers. Windsurf’s founder explains that even if AI generates most of the code, engineers still spend time reviewing it, debugging issues, designing systems, testing, deploying, and making architectural decisions. Those parts don’t disappear. He brings up Amdahl’s Law to make the point: speeding up one part of the workflow doesn’t dramatically change the total time unless everything else speeds up too. For example, if writing code takes 30 out of 100 total time units, and AI brings it down to 3, the total time still only drops to 73. That’s just a 27% improvement. More productivity doesn’t mean fewer engineers. It just increases the ROI of building tech. And when ROI goes up, companies are more likely to build—and hire more people to do it. Take JPMorgan Chase. They have 50,000+ engineers and a $17B software budget. If each engineer can ship more software, that doesn’t reduce headcount. It raises the cost of not building. Companies like Windsurf and Anthropic are hiring more engineers—not less—despite being at the edge of AI code generation.

Even if AI will write 90% of code. But it won’t replace engineers. Windsurf’s founder explains that even if AI generates most of the code, engineers still spend time reviewing it, debugging issues, designing systems, testing, deploying, and making architectural decisions. Those parts don’t disappear. He brings up Amdahl’s Law to make the point: speeding up one part of the workflow doesn’t dramatically change the total time unless everything else speeds up too. For example, if writing code takes 30 out of 100 total time units, and AI brings it down to 3, the total time still only drops to 73. That’s just a 27% improvement. More productivity doesn’t mean fewer engineers. It just increases the ROI of building tech. And when ROI goes up, companies are more likely to build—and hire more people to do it. Take JPMorgan Chase. They have 50,000+ engineers and a $17B software budget. If each engineer can ship more software, that doesn’t reduce headcount. It raises the cost of not building. Companies like Windsurf and Anthropic are hiring more engineers—not less—despite being at the edge of AI code generation.

Aish

27,268 просмотров • 1 год назад

Everyone's talking about vibe coding without looking at code. I was skeptical. I decided to give it a shot on a challenging problem and was blown away by what I could accomplish in 8 hours. I'm not skeptical anymore, but I also do NOT think it kills SaaS Notes: - I tried to replicate some of my favorite features from the Solve-It platform as a jupyter extension - I've tried this many times before, and it didn't work. - I gave my agent specific testing tools that I packaged as skills. I used AI to write the skills. I found the right testing workflow for this Jupyter extension by having AI peruse lots of other extensions and the Jupyter source code. - I had the AI write and maintain a large suite of tests the whole time. I think this was important in keeping the AI on track. - I watched the diffs and the thinking traces as they streamed by. From time to time, I would see something very suspicious like " try ... except: pass" And would stop the AI and tell it to stop this behavior. Then trigger a comprehensive code review using AI. - Most importantly, I don't think this kills SasS at all. Even if I can create software that replicates some of my favorite features, there is an insanely long tail of paper cuts and features I don't want to manage. The models and capabilities are improving so fast that I don't want to constantly tune everything. So I would rather leave that up to people who are focused on that daily and have good taste, with the knowledge that it has been battle tested against many users.

Everyone's talking about vibe coding without looking at code. I was skeptical. I decided to give it a shot on a challenging problem and was blown away by what I could accomplish in 8 hours. I'm not skeptical anymore, but I also do NOT think it kills SaaS Notes: - I tried to replicate some of my favorite features from the Solve-It platform as a jupyter extension - I've tried this many times before, and it didn't work. - I gave my agent specific testing tools that I packaged as skills. I used AI to write the skills. I found the right testing workflow for this Jupyter extension by having AI peruse lots of other extensions and the Jupyter source code. - I had the AI write and maintain a large suite of tests the whole time. I think this was important in keeping the AI on track. - I watched the diffs and the thinking traces as they streamed by. From time to time, I would see something very suspicious like " try ... except: pass" And would stop the AI and tell it to stop this behavior. Then trigger a comprehensive code review using AI. - Most importantly, I don't think this kills SasS at all. Even if I can create software that replicates some of my favorite features, there is an insanely long tail of paper cuts and features I don't want to manage. The models and capabilities are improving so fast that I don't want to constantly tune everything. So I would rather leave that up to people who are focused on that daily and have good taste, with the knowledge that it has been battle tested against many users.

Hamel Husain

48,930 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Everyone and their mom is using claude code, so how do you stand out? Well, you learn how to use claude code like a senior software engineer. John Lindquist (AI DX Vercel) joins this week at How I AI to walk us through his flows, hooks, and tools that supercharge his cc instance. You'll learn how to - use mermaid diagrams for context - alias your favorite AI commands - write hooks for code quality We also debate TUI vs IDE, discuss esoteric file formats, and build a couple things live. Whether you're an advanced user or CC or wanting to get there, this is the ep for you. ty ty ty to our awesome sponsors 💼 WorkOS- Make your app enterprise-ready today 🔀 Tines - start building intelligent workflows today Watch it here:

Everyone and their mom is using claude code, so how do you stand out? Well, you learn how to use claude code like a senior software engineer. John Lindquist (AI DX Vercel) joins this week at How I AI to walk us through his flows, hooks, and tools that supercharge his cc instance. You'll learn how to - use mermaid diagrams for context - alias your favorite AI commands - write hooks for code quality We also debate TUI vs IDE, discuss esoteric file formats, and build a couple things live. Whether you're an advanced user or CC or wanting to get there, this is the ep for you. ty ty ty to our awesome sponsors 💼 WorkOS- Make your app enterprise-ready today 🔀 Tines - start building intelligent workflows today Watch it here:

claire vo 🖤

26,050 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Google is releasing updates that will let their AI scan all your photos and it will be used to create highly personalized AI image generations or you, your family, pets and more The AI is going to have access to your Gmail, YouTube, search history, photos, calendar and more. The concerning part is Google has admitted to using user data to improve its models People have screenshots of passwords, credit cards, photos of themselves doing intimate things. And all of that is gonna get uploaded to an AI system that is one of many that is consistently shown to be unreliable and not safe at all when it comes to data privacy Let’s not forget that have data leaks, one happened not too long ago Do we really want AI to have access to all this information and being sent back to these massive companies? You’ll be able to opt out of some of it but for your phone to have access to certain features you’ll need to opt in It always starts out optional, then becomes mandatory

Google is releasing updates that will let their AI scan all your photos and it will be used to create highly personalized AI image generations or you, your family, pets and more The AI is going to have access to your Gmail, YouTube, search history, photos, calendar and more. The concerning part is Google has admitted to using user data to improve its models People have screenshots of passwords, credit cards, photos of themselves doing intimate things. And all of that is gonna get uploaded to an AI system that is one of many that is consistently shown to be unreliable and not safe at all when it comes to data privacy Let’s not forget that have data leaks, one happened not too long ago Do we really want AI to have access to all this information and being sent back to these massive companies? You’ll be able to opt out of some of it but for your phone to have access to certain features you’ll need to opt in It always starts out optional, then becomes mandatory

Wall Street Apes

85,514 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Last week I sat down with Ankit and did a brain dump. 1. A software factory is essentially a CNC machine or a woodworking shop. Without training, many people will cut off their hands. 2. Building a true “dark factory” as fully automated software production with no humans in the loop means solving autonomous verification first 3. Code review was mostly broken even before AI happened. 4. Agent maintainability is replacing human maintainability as the real measure of code quality 5. Nobody Knows What Engineering Orgs Will Look Like 6. Programming Languages Will Converge, and the Next One Won't Be for Humans 7. The Craft Is More Important Than Ever

Last week I sat down with Ankit and did a brain dump. 1. A software factory is essentially a CNC machine or a woodworking shop. Without training, many people will cut off their hands. 2. Building a true “dark factory” as fully automated software production with no humans in the loop means solving autonomous verification first 3. Code review was mostly broken even before AI happened. 4. Agent maintainability is replacing human maintainability as the real measure of code quality 5. Nobody Knows What Engineering Orgs Will Look Like 6. Programming Languages Will Converge, and the Next One Won't Be for Humans 7. The Craft Is More Important Than Ever

geoff

12,938 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

In our latest Box AI Enterprise Eval, we tested Paul Jankura’s Claude 4 Sonnet and Opus models, now integrated into Box AI, across enterprise Q&A tasks, technical workflows, and advanced coding scenarios—revealing major advancements in developer productivity and content intelligence. AI-assisted coding and development just reached a new milestone! Here's what we discovered: Claude 4 significantly improves understanding, generating, and debugging code across multiple programming languages. Developers can: ↳ Accelerate code generation ↳ Improve debugging ↳ Enhance technical documentation ↳ Build smarter AI agents 👉 Automating Financial Analysis with Code Generation: We evaluated Claude 4 by using the Box AI API to analyze ten complex 10-K financial reports. Claude 4 dynamically generated Python code to fetch file IDs from a Box folder, automating data extraction. Within two minutes, it accurately extracted key company data such as revenues, metrics, and highlights—demonstrating its potential to streamline demanding analytical tasks. 👉 Understanding Enterprise Content: Our evaluation confirms Claude 4 maintains strong performance on enterprise Q&A tasks, effectively extracting precise details from single documents and reliably synthesizing information across multiple sources. This ensures seamless integration of structured and unstructured data alongside powerful coding capabilities. 🔓 Developer-Centric Use Cases Unlocked: Organizations can leverage Claude 4 within Box AI to: ↳ Create custom engineering agents referencing technical documents stored in Box, pulling real-time data from Jira, or finding solutions on Stack Overflow. ↳ Build intelligent technical support bots capable of analyzing user-provided code snippets against internal manuals. ↳ Automate secure code reviews by evaluating repository code (stored in Box) against security policies. ↳ Efficiently migrate legacy systems by translating old codebases into modern languages or platforms. Ready to empower your developers and accelerate innovation? To explore Claude 4 Sonnet and Opus through Box AI Studio and APIs, contact us at ailabs@box.com and request early access today! Learn more:

In our latest Box AI Enterprise Eval, we tested Paul Jankura’s Claude 4 Sonnet and Opus models, now integrated into Box AI, across enterprise Q&A tasks, technical workflows, and advanced coding scenarios—revealing major advancements in developer productivity and content intelligence. AI-assisted coding and development just reached a new milestone! Here's what we discovered: Claude 4 significantly improves understanding, generating, and debugging code across multiple programming languages. Developers can: ↳ Accelerate code generation ↳ Improve debugging ↳ Enhance technical documentation ↳ Build smarter AI agents 👉 Automating Financial Analysis with Code Generation: We evaluated Claude 4 by using the Box AI API to analyze ten complex 10-K financial reports. Claude 4 dynamically generated Python code to fetch file IDs from a Box folder, automating data extraction. Within two minutes, it accurately extracted key company data such as revenues, metrics, and highlights—demonstrating its potential to streamline demanding analytical tasks. 👉 Understanding Enterprise Content: Our evaluation confirms Claude 4 maintains strong performance on enterprise Q&A tasks, effectively extracting precise details from single documents and reliably synthesizing information across multiple sources. This ensures seamless integration of structured and unstructured data alongside powerful coding capabilities. 🔓 Developer-Centric Use Cases Unlocked: Organizations can leverage Claude 4 within Box AI to: ↳ Create custom engineering agents referencing technical documents stored in Box, pulling real-time data from Jira, or finding solutions on Stack Overflow. ↳ Build intelligent technical support bots capable of analyzing user-provided code snippets against internal manuals. ↳ Automate secure code reviews by evaluating repository code (stored in Box) against security policies. ↳ Efficiently migrate legacy systems by translating old codebases into modern languages or platforms. Ready to empower your developers and accelerate innovation? To explore Claude 4 Sonnet and Opus through Box AI Studio and APIs, contact us at [email protected] and request early access today! Learn more:

Box

285,676 просмотров • 1 год назад

People always argue that AI writes terrible code & breaks in a real, large codebase. Well, episode 14 of How I AI will show you how AI can write high quality, production code for engineering teams of 100+ My pal Zach is an eng leader at LaunchDarkly and went from an AI sceptic to driving AI adoption in 6 months. In this ep he shows: 📑 how to structure docs in your repo so you DRY to your AI agents ✅ use AI to burn down tech debt 🙊 use ChatGPT to help you be a less conflict avoidant manager This ep is the “big company” sequel to Ryan Carson’s structured vibe coding ep and not one to miss. Big thanks to our sponsors: 🎩 WorkOS – Make your app enterprise-ready today 🛠️ Maven 🏛 – hands on AI education curated by Lenny Rachitsky and me!

People always argue that AI writes terrible code & breaks in a real, large codebase. Well, episode 14 of How I AI will show you how AI can write high quality, production code for engineering teams of 100+ My pal Zach is an eng leader at LaunchDarkly and went from an AI sceptic to driving AI adoption in 6 months. In this ep he shows: 📑 how to structure docs in your repo so you DRY to your AI agents ✅ use AI to burn down tech debt 🙊 use ChatGPT to help you be a less conflict avoidant manager This ep is the “big company” sequel to Ryan Carson’s structured vibe coding ep and not one to miss. Big thanks to our sponsors: 🎩 WorkOS – Make your app enterprise-ready today 🛠️ Maven 🏛 – hands on AI education curated by Lenny Rachitsky and me!

claire vo 🖤

82,224 просмотров • 1 год назад

I set up Gemini Spark to write my own weekly AI news digest for me, and I'm still stuck on how little effort I had to put in. This is the exact prompt I gave it, just once: "Every Tuesday at 12:15 PM, create a new Doc in my Drive, find the 5 biggest AI stories from that week, and format each one properly." And here's what it actually produces, every week: 1. A new Doc, created and named on its own 2. The 5 biggest AI stories from that week, found and picked automatically 3. A bold headline and a summary for each one 4. The key impact spelled out, not just the news 5. A source link on every single story This runs on a schedule so I never have to think about it again. I didn't ask anything on Tuesday, I just opened the drive and the news digest doc was already there. Just like this, you can use Spark to automate any recurring task.

I set up Gemini Spark to write my own weekly AI news digest for me, and I'm still stuck on how little effort I had to put in. This is the exact prompt I gave it, just once: "Every Tuesday at 12:15 PM, create a new Doc in my Drive, find the 5 biggest AI stories from that week, and format each one properly." And here's what it actually produces, every week: 1. A new Doc, created and named on its own 2. The 5 biggest AI stories from that week, found and picked automatically 3. A bold headline and a summary for each one 4. The key impact spelled out, not just the news 5. A source link on every single story This runs on a schedule so I never have to think about it again. I didn't ask anything on Tuesday, I just opened the drive and the news digest doc was already there. Just like this, you can use Spark to automate any recurring task.

Eyisha Zyer

36,233 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Boris Cherny, Head of Claude Code at Anthropic: "I do not prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude. My job is to write loops." The person who built the most used AI coding tool stopped prompting entirely. Most people using it every day are still typing one request at a time. This Github repo changes that. ↳ Seven production loop patterns with real token cost estimates ↳ CLI that scaffolds your entire loop in five minutes ↳ Starters for Grok, Claude Code, Codex, and Opencode The repo gives you the framework. My article covers the mental shift that makes it actually work.

Boris Cherny, Head of Claude Code at Anthropic: "I do not prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude. My job is to write loops." The person who built the most used AI coding tool stopped prompting entirely. Most people using it every day are still typing one request at a time. This Github repo changes that. ↳ Seven production loop patterns with real token cost estimates ↳ CLI that scaffolds your entire loop in five minutes ↳ Starters for Grok, Claude Code, Codex, and Opencode The repo gives you the framework. My article covers the mental shift that makes it actually work.

Kanika

20,148 просмотров • 16 дней назад

Fresh off the launch of Opus 5, Claude Code creator Boris Cherny (Boris Cherny) joins YC's Diana at Startup School 2026 to talk about what the newest models can do, how Claude Code came to be, and what it means to build products when the underlying capabilities keep accelerating. 00:07 — What Makes Opus 5 Different 02:06 — Solving Prompt Injection 03:21 — Why Claude Code Deleted 80% of Its System Prompt 06:37 — Press Delete on Your AI Product 07:20 — How to Rebuild Your System Prompt 10:30 — Product Overhang and “Unhobbling” AI 14:26 — Give Claude Harder Problems 19:32 — Prompt Engineering Is Changing 21:57 — The Two-Week Claude Code Prompt 24:42 — Running Thousands of AI Agents 30:15 — Coding Is (Almost) Solved 32:20 — What Every CS Student Should Still Learn Anthropic Claude

Fresh off the launch of Opus 5, Claude Code creator Boris Cherny (Boris Cherny) joins YC's Diana at Startup School 2026 to talk about what the newest models can do, how Claude Code came to be, and what it means to build products when the underlying capabilities keep accelerating. 00:07 — What Makes Opus 5 Different 02:06 — Solving Prompt Injection 03:21 — Why Claude Code Deleted 80% of Its System Prompt 06:37 — Press Delete on Your AI Product 07:20 — How to Rebuild Your System Prompt 10:30 — Product Overhang and “Unhobbling” AI 14:26 — Give Claude Harder Problems 19:32 — Prompt Engineering Is Changing 21:57 — The Two-Week Claude Code Prompt 24:42 — Running Thousands of AI Agents 30:15 — Coding Is (Almost) Solved 32:20 — What Every CS Student Should Still Learn Anthropic Claude

Y Combinator

82,842 просмотров • 14 дней назад

🚨 OpenAI just launched Codex, a brand-new autonomous coding agent that can build features and fix bugs on its own. We’ve been using it Every 📧 for a few days, and I’m impressed. I invited Alexander Embiricos (ben davies), a member of the product staff responsible for Codex, to demo Codex and talk about it live on a special edition of AI & I: What Codex is and how it works Codex is designed to be used by senior engineers—it performs coding tasks like adding features or fixing bugs autonomously. It's built to allow you to start many sessions at once, so you can have multiple agents working in parallel. Codex is built to have "taste" OpenAI trained Codex to have the taste of a senior software engineer. It knows how big codebases work, how to write a good PR, and uses clean, minimal code. Why an “abundance mindset” is best for interacting with agents Codex is designed to allow users to delegate many tasks at once without getting caught up in the details. This lets you point an abundance of agents at a specific task like a difficult bug—it’s worth it even if only one of them succeeds. How OpenAI is thinking about agents Codex is one piece of a unified super-assistant OpenAI wants to eventually build—an agent that helps users easily get things done by selecting the right tools for them behind the scenes. OpenAI’s vision for the future of programming In the future developers will probably spend less time writing routine code and more time guiding agents, reviewing their work, and making strategy decisions. Programming will become more social, letting teams easily delegate multiple tasks at once, allowing people to focus on ideas and collaboration instead of routine coding. Watch below!

Dan Shipper 📧

145,487 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sure, you can vibe code but have you ever shipped so much with AI you literally break GitHub? That’s what Chintan Turakhia and the team at Coinbase 🛡️ did as they pushed the edge of engineering with AI. This week, Chintan and I chat about how to get 1000s of engineers cooking with AI in real, production scale environments. You’ll see - how to use Cursor to build a mini app to drive more cursor adoption - his video/voice -> Linear -> Claude process for speed running user feedback - a new model for eng leadership where there’s more code than meetings Bonus: we get his hack on finding great wines based on scribbled tasting notes. Thanks to our awesome sponsors 💼 WorkOS - Make your app enterprise ready today 🐶 Atlassian Rovo - AI that knows your business Watch now:

Sure, you can vibe code but have you ever shipped so much with AI you literally break GitHub? That’s what Chintan Turakhia and the team at Coinbase 🛡️ did as they pushed the edge of engineering with AI. This week, Chintan and I chat about how to get 1000s of engineers cooking with AI in real, production scale environments. You’ll see - how to use Cursor to build a mini app to drive more cursor adoption - his video/voice -> Linear -> Claude process for speed running user feedback - a new model for eng leadership where there’s more code than meetings Bonus: we get his hack on finding great wines based on scribbled tasting notes. Thanks to our awesome sponsors 💼 WorkOS - Make your app enterprise ready today 🐶 Atlassian Rovo - AI that knows your business Watch now:

claire vo 🖤

72,638 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

ELON: AI PROGRESS IS BLOWING MY MIND MULTIPLE TIMES A WEEK “We're in the singularity. We're at the top of the rollercoaster, and you're about to go down. I don't just have courtside seats: I'm on the court. And it blows my mind, and it still blows my mind, sometimes multiple times a week. I'm like, wow and then two days later, more wow! I think we'll hit AGI next year in 2026.” Source: Elon Musk in Moonshot – Discussion with Peter H. Diamandis, MD and NOTDAVID, January 2026

ELON: AI PROGRESS IS BLOWING MY MIND MULTIPLE TIMES A WEEK “We're in the singularity. We're at the top of the rollercoaster, and you're about to go down. I don't just have courtside seats: I'm on the court. And it blows my mind, and it still blows my mind, sometimes multiple times a week. I'm like, wow and then two days later, more wow! I think we'll hit AGI next year in 2026.” Source: Elon Musk in Moonshot – Discussion with Peter H. Diamandis, MD and NOTDAVID, January 2026

Mario Nawfal

1,609,501 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

A 25-year-old Indian developer created a game called GTA India and 23,654 people have already purchased it Game Price: $5 Revenue: $118,270 Costs: $200 spent on AI for modifications Instead of standard criminal shootouts, the game features unique missions focused on organizing grand weddings. You have to hijack a limousine motorcade, fight off rival families, and deliver the bride to the temple on time. You must do all this while shooting at pursuers from the window of a flower-decorated SUV The game also features completely overhauled physics for overloaded transport. The more people you pack onto the roof of your bus or into a truck, the more the handling, center of gravity, and suspension change He developed it using Claude Code and Python on the Unity engine, taking GTA 5 as a base, then modifying and rewriting the code with the help of AI Sometimes, to achieve success, you just need to do something literally funny

A 25-year-old Indian developer created a game called GTA India and 23,654 people have already purchased it Game Price: $5 Revenue: $118,270 Costs: $200 spent on AI for modifications Instead of standard criminal shootouts, the game features unique missions focused on organizing grand weddings. You have to hijack a limousine motorcade, fight off rival families, and deliver the bride to the temple on time. You must do all this while shooting at pursuers from the window of a flower-decorated SUV The game also features completely overhauled physics for overloaded transport. The more people you pack onto the roof of your bus or into a truck, the more the handling, center of gravity, and suspension change He developed it using Claude Code and Python on the Unity engine, taking GTA 5 as a base, then modifying and rewriting the code with the help of AI Sometimes, to achieve success, you just need to do something literally funny

Bober_smart

42,355 просмотров • 26 дней назад

Marc Andreessen explains why AI coding won't replace programmers, but fundamentally change what they do. He argues that AI coding is just the latest abstraction layer, and the job of a programmer has always evolved with each one. Andreessen's key reframe of what's actually happening: "AI coding actually abstracts away the process of actually writing the scripting code... This is the next layer of the task redefinition under the job of programmer." He's clear that the best programmers aren't being replaced. They're already adapting, even if their day-to-day looks radically different now. Their job has shifted from writing code line by line to managing dozens of AI agents working in parallel. "The world's best programmers today will tell you, 'My job is I'm sitting there and I'm orchestrating 10 code bots running in parallel.' Their day job now is kind of arguing with the AI bots to try to get them to write the right code." But Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 is adamant this doesn't make foundational knowledge obsolete — it makes it more important. "You need to still fully understand and learn how to write and understand code, because if it doesn't work or it's not doing what you expect, you need to be able to understand the results of what the AI is giving you." He draws a direct parallel: Just as someone writing scripting languages still needs to understand how a microprocessor works, someone orchestrating AI bots needs to understand the code those bots produce. "It's this upleveling of capability where you actually want the depth to go down and understand what the thing is actually doing, even if you're not spending your day doing that by hand." The result, in his view, is transformative: "Now programmers are going to be 10 times or 100 times or a thousand times more productive. And that is overwhelmingly a good thing." The pattern: New abstraction layer emerges → tasks change → the job gets redefined upward → productivity explodes It raises a question every programmer should be sitting with... Are you building the depth to evaluate what AI gives you, or just accepting the output?

Marc Andreessen explains why AI coding won't replace programmers, but fundamentally change what they do. He argues that AI coding is just the latest abstraction layer, and the job of a programmer has always evolved with each one. Andreessen's key reframe of what's actually happening: "AI coding actually abstracts away the process of actually writing the scripting code... This is the next layer of the task redefinition under the job of programmer." He's clear that the best programmers aren't being replaced. They're already adapting, even if their day-to-day looks radically different now. Their job has shifted from writing code line by line to managing dozens of AI agents working in parallel. "The world's best programmers today will tell you, 'My job is I'm sitting there and I'm orchestrating 10 code bots running in parallel.' Their day job now is kind of arguing with the AI bots to try to get them to write the right code." But Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 is adamant this doesn't make foundational knowledge obsolete — it makes it more important. "You need to still fully understand and learn how to write and understand code, because if it doesn't work or it's not doing what you expect, you need to be able to understand the results of what the AI is giving you." He draws a direct parallel: Just as someone writing scripting languages still needs to understand how a microprocessor works, someone orchestrating AI bots needs to understand the code those bots produce. "It's this upleveling of capability where you actually want the depth to go down and understand what the thing is actually doing, even if you're not spending your day doing that by hand." The result, in his view, is transformative: "Now programmers are going to be 10 times or 100 times or a thousand times more productive. And that is overwhelmingly a good thing." The pattern: New abstraction layer emerges → tasks change → the job gets redefined upward → productivity explodes It raises a question every programmer should be sitting with... Are you building the depth to evaluate what AI gives you, or just accepting the output?

Big Brain AI

45,325 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Should computer science and basic coding still be taught in schools at all? Should writing? In my interview with the President of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sally Kornbluth, she asked "I am not sure how much you need to have in your head to think creatively versus how much you have to offload" One of the biggest concerns I hear from CEOs & engineering leaders: Junior devs who’ve never studied or wrestled with great code are skipping straight to letting AI write it for them. If this continues, in 10 years we’ll have very few engineers left who actually know how to think through it.

Should computer science and basic coding still be taught in schools at all? Should writing? In my interview with the President of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sally Kornbluth, she asked "I am not sure how much you need to have in your head to think creatively versus how much you have to offload" One of the biggest concerns I hear from CEOs & engineering leaders: Junior devs who’ve never studied or wrestled with great code are skipping straight to letting AI write it for them. If this continues, in 10 years we’ll have very few engineers left who actually know how to think through it.

Brian Halligan

30,546 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад