Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Local voice AI with a 235 billion parameter LLM. ✅ - smart-turn v2 - MLX Whisper (large-v3-turbo-q4) - Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507-3bit-DWQ - Kokoro All models running local on an M4 mac. Max RAM usage ~110GB. Voice-to-voice latency is ~950ms. There are a couple of relatively easy ways to carve another ~100ms...

kwindla's profile picture

kwindla

15,569 subscribers

66,784 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Llama 4 voice agent starter kit with Groq Inc and Pipecat AI ➡️ Groq STT (distil-whisper-large-v3) ➡️ Groq Llama 4 (llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct) ➡️ Groq TTS (playai-tts) ➡️ Function calling ➡️ Deploy to Pipecat Cloud for production ➡️ Optionally add a twilio phone number for telephone voice AI
1:48

Llama 4 voice agent starter kit with Groq Inc and Pipecat AI ➡️ Groq STT (distil-whisper-large-v3) ➡️ Groq Llama 4 (llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct) ➡️ Groq TTS (playai-tts) ➡️ Function calling ➡️ Deploy to Pipecat Cloud for production ➡️ Optionally add a twilio phone number for telephone voice AI

kwindla

58,764 просмотров • 1 год назад

Another example of the multiple TTS parallel pipelines pattern. Here's a voice AI agent that speaks both English and Arabic, using a specific model/voice for each language. These are PlayAI voices. The STT, TTS, and LLM inference is all running on Groq Inc. (The LLM is LLama 4 Maverick.)
1:26

Another example of the multiple TTS parallel pipelines pattern. Here's a voice AI agent that speaks both English and Arabic, using a specific model/voice for each language. These are PlayAI voices. The STT, TTS, and LLM inference is all running on Groq Inc. (The LLM is LLama 4 Maverick.)

kwindla

13,401 просмотров • 1 год назад

The voice-to-voice AI Pareto frontier. (You'll never believe this one weird trick ...) If you're building conversational voice AI apps, you care a lot about: ➟ Latency ➟ Cost ➟ LLM response quality (predictable behavior, coverage of the full surface area of your needs, reliable function calling, "reasoning") ➟ Voice quality (correct pronunciations, consistent tone, appropriate affect, steerability, "human-ness") AI model performance is a jagged frontier and has been moving fast for all of 2024. This is especially true for conversational voice, because you're usually using several models in combination. LLMs with native audio capabilities are the newest evolution pushing the performance frontier. Here's a multi-lingual voice conversation using Gemini Flash 1.5's native audio input. But there's a problem ...
1:01

The voice-to-voice AI Pareto frontier. (You'll never believe this one weird trick ...) If you're building conversational voice AI apps, you care a lot about: ➟ Latency ➟ Cost ➟ LLM response quality (predictable behavior, coverage of the full surface area of your needs, reliable function calling, "reasoning") ➟ Voice quality (correct pronunciations, consistent tone, appropriate affect, steerability, "human-ness") AI model performance is a jagged frontier and has been moving fast for all of 2024. This is especially true for conversational voice, because you're usually using several models in combination. LLMs with native audio capabilities are the newest evolution pushing the performance frontier. Here's a multi-lingual voice conversation using Gemini Flash 1.5's native audio input. But there's a problem ...

kwindla

23,592 просмотров • 1 год назад

A voice agent powered by gpt-oss. Running locally on my macBook. Demo recorded in a Waymo with WiFi turned off. I'm still on my space game voice AI kick, obviously. Code link below. For conversational voice AI, you want to set the gpt-oss reasoning behavior to "low". (The default is "medium".) Notes on how to do that and a jinja template you can use are in the repo. The LLM in the demo video is the big, 120B version of gpt-oss. You can use the smaller, 20B model for this, of course. But OpenAI really did a cool thing here designing the 120B model to run in "just" 80GB of VRAM. And the llama.cpp mlx inference is fast: ~250ms TTFT. Running a big model on-device feels like a time warp into the future of AI.
4:35

A voice agent powered by gpt-oss. Running locally on my macBook. Demo recorded in a Waymo with WiFi turned off. I'm still on my space game voice AI kick, obviously. Code link below. For conversational voice AI, you want to set the gpt-oss reasoning behavior to "low". (The default is "medium".) Notes on how to do that and a jinja template you can use are in the repo. The LLM in the demo video is the big, 120B version of gpt-oss. You can use the smaller, 20B model for this, of course. But OpenAI really did a cool thing here designing the 120B model to run in "just" 80GB of VRAM. And the llama.cpp mlx inference is fast: ~250ms TTFT. Running a big model on-device feels like a time warp into the future of AI.

kwindla

202,211 просмотров • 1 год назад

🔊🔛🔥 ... Groq Inc launched voice generation today. GroqCloud now has realtime transcription, LLMs, *and* text-to-speech. You can build super-responsive, ultra low-latency voice agents end-to-end entirely on Groq! At Daily, we're big fans of Groq's fast, low-latency inference. Pipecat AI supports all the Groq models, including the new voice model. Lately, we've been obsessively playing a voice chat game that Mark Backman wrote. (My high score is 6, so far.) Here's Mark, with Groq's `Celeste-PlayAI` voice.
0:47

🔊🔛🔥 ... Groq Inc launched voice generation today. GroqCloud now has realtime transcription, LLMs, *and* text-to-speech. You can build super-responsive, ultra low-latency voice agents end-to-end entirely on Groq! At Daily, we're big fans of Groq's fast, low-latency inference. Pipecat AI supports all the Groq models, including the new voice model. Lately, we've been obsessively playing a voice chat game that Mark Backman wrote. (My high score is 6, so far.) Here's Mark, with Groq's `Celeste-PlayAI` voice.

kwindla

31,843 просмотров • 1 год назад

How to build the world's fastest voice AI bot: - Self-host speech-to-text, LLM inference, and text-to-speech all together in the same container/cluster. - Route audio over the internet using WebRTC and edge networking. - Configure timings for voice activity detection, phrase endpointing, and other parts of the pipeline to optimize for latency. (There are trade-offs to doing this!) Here's a LLama 3 voice bot that has voice-to-voice response times of ~500ms. We used Deepgram's STT and TTS for this bot, and everything is hosted on cerebriumai's serverless GPU infrastructure.
4:18

How to build the world's fastest voice AI bot: - Self-host speech-to-text, LLM inference, and text-to-speech all together in the same container/cluster. - Route audio over the internet using WebRTC and edge networking. - Configure timings for voice activity detection, phrase endpointing, and other parts of the pipeline to optimize for latency. (There are trade-offs to doing this!) Here's a LLama 3 voice bot that has voice-to-voice response times of ~500ms. We used Deepgram's STT and TTS for this bot, and everything is hosted on cerebriumai's serverless GPU infrastructure.

kwindla

282,806 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Introducing PhoneLLM, an open model for voice agents. GPT 5.6 Terra performance on typical voice agent tasks at 1/3 the latency and 1/18 the cost. For voice agents, we need models that are both very low latency and very good at tool calling and instruction following. There's a trade-off here, and we often have to compromise on either latency or capability when building voice agents. With PhoneLLM (and the training and data stack that made this model possible) we're fixing this problem. For the last couple of years, most of the effort in frontier model development has gone towards leveraging test-time compute. Which is awesome! Models of all shapes and sizes are available that perform really, really well ... if you have "thinking" turned on for your model. But if you need your agent to respond at voice conversation speed, you can't use thinking models. PhoneLLM is a full-weights fine-tune of NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 30B. We trained on a wide range of real-world telephone and customer support use cases. The training focused on taking the excellent Nano 30B base capabilities and teaching the model to do typical voice agent tasks with thinking disabled. The results are really good: accurate tool calling and concise, on-topic responses in long conversations. And fast: TTFAT measured server-side is <100ms if you run PhoneLLM on a lightly loaded B200. :-) But seriously, when we characterize model latency, we do it with full, end-to-end, batched request simulations using real Pipecat voice agent pipelines. You can serve more than 80 concurrent agents on a single B200 with P95 end-to-end TTFAT <600ms. Including network overhead. That's an LLM cost-per-minute around $0.0025. (1/4 of a cent.) At a latency lower than any third-party API offers today. More details about this model, including weights on Hugging Face, how to spin it up with one click on Modal, and a starter project repo you can clone, are in the thread ...
3:28

Introducing PhoneLLM, an open model for voice agents. GPT 5.6 Terra performance on typical voice agent tasks at 1/3 the latency and 1/18 the cost. For voice agents, we need models that are both very low latency and very good at tool calling and instruction following. There's a trade-off here, and we often have to compromise on either latency or capability when building voice agents. With PhoneLLM (and the training and data stack that made this model possible) we're fixing this problem. For the last couple of years, most of the effort in frontier model development has gone towards leveraging test-time compute. Which is awesome! Models of all shapes and sizes are available that perform really, really well ... if you have "thinking" turned on for your model. But if you need your agent to respond at voice conversation speed, you can't use thinking models. PhoneLLM is a full-weights fine-tune of NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 30B. We trained on a wide range of real-world telephone and customer support use cases. The training focused on taking the excellent Nano 30B base capabilities and teaching the model to do typical voice agent tasks with thinking disabled. The results are really good: accurate tool calling and concise, on-topic responses in long conversations. And fast: TTFAT measured server-side is <100ms if you run PhoneLLM on a lightly loaded B200. :-) But seriously, when we characterize model latency, we do it with full, end-to-end, batched request simulations using real Pipecat voice agent pipelines. You can serve more than 80 concurrent agents on a single B200 with P95 end-to-end TTFAT <600ms. Including network overhead. That's an LLM cost-per-minute around $0.0025. (1/4 of a cent.) At a latency lower than any third-party API offers today. More details about this model, including weights on Hugging Face, how to spin it up with one click on Modal, and a starter project repo you can clone, are in the thread ...

kwindla

324,083 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Smart Turn v2: open source, native audio turn detection in 14 languages. New checkpoint of the open source, open data, open training code, semantic VAD model on Hugging Face, fal, and Pipecat AI. - 3x faster inference (12ms on an L40) - 14 languages (13 more than v1, which was english-only) - New synthetic data set `chirp_3_all` with ~163k audio samples - 99% accuracy on held out `human_5_all` test data Good turn detection is critical for voice agents. This model "understands" both semantic and audio patterns, and mitigates the voice AI trade-off between unwanted turn latency vs the agent interrupting people before they are finished speaking. Training scripts for both Modal and local training are in the repo. We want to make it as easy as possible to contribute to or customize this model! Here's a demo running the smart-turn model with default settings, aimed at generally hitting 400ms total turn detection time. You can tune things to be faster, too. You can help by contributing data, doing architecture expermints, or cleaning open source data! Keep reading ...
2:12

Smart Turn v2: open source, native audio turn detection in 14 languages. New checkpoint of the open source, open data, open training code, semantic VAD model on Hugging Face, fal, and Pipecat AI. - 3x faster inference (12ms on an L40) - 14 languages (13 more than v1, which was english-only) - New synthetic data set `chirp_3_all` with ~163k audio samples - 99% accuracy on held out `human_5_all` test data Good turn detection is critical for voice agents. This model "understands" both semantic and audio patterns, and mitigates the voice AI trade-off between unwanted turn latency vs the agent interrupting people before they are finished speaking. Training scripts for both Modal and local training are in the repo. We want to make it as easy as possible to contribute to or customize this model! Here's a demo running the smart-turn model with default settings, aimed at generally hitting 400ms total turn detection time. You can tune things to be faster, too. You can help by contributing data, doing architecture expermints, or cleaning open source data! Keep reading ...

kwindla

42,246 просмотров • 1 год назад

Cerebras inference is very fast. So fast that it changes how we think about configuring our LLMs for voice agent use cases. Kimi K2.6 is a 1T parameter reasoning model that Cerebras serves at 650 - 1,000 tokens per second (end-to-end throughput), with time to first token metrics as low as 150ms (latency). These numbers are two to three times faster than other similarly capable models. The biggest lever we get from this kind of speed is that we can use the model in reasoning mode, and still have excellent "time to first non-thinking token." This solves a big pain point we have in 2026 for voice agent use cases. Almost all recent innovation in post-training has focused on making models good at reasoning ("test time compute"). This is great, but it makes the user-facing model latency much, much slower. Which is a problem for conversational voice agents. We can run Kimi K2.6 with reasoning turned on, and get responses faster than other models produce with reasoning disabled. On my 30-turn voice agent benchmark, Kimi K2.6 with reasoning enabled ties GPT 5.1 and Haiku 4.5 with reasoning disabled, and is still about 200ms seconds faster! On my primary task agent benchmark, Kimi K2.6 is now the #2 model. It ranks just behind Gemini 3.5 Flash in "high" reasoning mode, and tied with GLM 5, Sonnet 4.6, and GPT 5.4 with reasoning set to "low." But Kimi K2.6 completes each turn in the agent loop in under 500ms. The other four models are all at least 3x slower. (Models only qualify for this benchmark if they can complete task turns at a P50 <4s.) A couple of other things that this speed buys us, for production voice agents: - Tool calls happen fast enough that we don't have to work around tool call latency in our pipeline design. - We can prompt the model to output structured data at the beginning of a response, followed by plain text for voice generation. This opens up possibilities like asking the model to do complex classification/generation tasks that influence the rest of the pipeline. For example, the model could create a detailed style prompt for a steerable TTS model, for each individual conversation turn. And, of course, you can use Kimi K2.6 with reasoning turned off. Cerebras calls this "instant" mode. Here's a video of a Cerebras Kimi K2.6 voice agent with voice-to-voice response time, measured at the client, under 500ms. This is the true response latency as perceived by the user, including all network and audio codec overhead, transcription and turn detection, Kimi K2.6 token generation, and voice generation. 500ms is, effectively, instant. So the Cerebras naming for this mode is a propos. :-)
0:40

Cerebras inference is very fast. So fast that it changes how we think about configuring our LLMs for voice agent use cases. Kimi K2.6 is a 1T parameter reasoning model that Cerebras serves at 650 - 1,000 tokens per second (end-to-end throughput), with time to first token metrics as low as 150ms (latency). These numbers are two to three times faster than other similarly capable models. The biggest lever we get from this kind of speed is that we can use the model in reasoning mode, and still have excellent "time to first non-thinking token." This solves a big pain point we have in 2026 for voice agent use cases. Almost all recent innovation in post-training has focused on making models good at reasoning ("test time compute"). This is great, but it makes the user-facing model latency much, much slower. Which is a problem for conversational voice agents. We can run Kimi K2.6 with reasoning turned on, and get responses faster than other models produce with reasoning disabled. On my 30-turn voice agent benchmark, Kimi K2.6 with reasoning enabled ties GPT 5.1 and Haiku 4.5 with reasoning disabled, and is still about 200ms seconds faster! On my primary task agent benchmark, Kimi K2.6 is now the #2 model. It ranks just behind Gemini 3.5 Flash in "high" reasoning mode, and tied with GLM 5, Sonnet 4.6, and GPT 5.4 with reasoning set to "low." But Kimi K2.6 completes each turn in the agent loop in under 500ms. The other four models are all at least 3x slower. (Models only qualify for this benchmark if they can complete task turns at a P50 <4s.) A couple of other things that this speed buys us, for production voice agents: - Tool calls happen fast enough that we don't have to work around tool call latency in our pipeline design. - We can prompt the model to output structured data at the beginning of a response, followed by plain text for voice generation. This opens up possibilities like asking the model to do complex classification/generation tasks that influence the rest of the pipeline. For example, the model could create a detailed style prompt for a steerable TTS model, for each individual conversation turn. And, of course, you can use Kimi K2.6 with reasoning turned off. Cerebras calls this "instant" mode. Here's a video of a Cerebras Kimi K2.6 voice agent with voice-to-voice response time, measured at the client, under 500ms. This is the true response latency as perceived by the user, including all network and audio codec overhead, transcription and turn detection, Kimi K2.6 token generation, and voice generation. 500ms is, effectively, instant. So the Cerebras naming for this mode is a propos. :-)

kwindla

40,593 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Voice AI turn taking is a solved problem. The single most common complaint about voice AI, today, is that agents interrupt too often. But the voice agents I build for myself now respond quickly and interrupt me less often than the people I talk to every day. (I actually measured this.) Mark Backman made a Pipecat AI PR two weeks ago that was the last piece of the puzzle for turn taking so good that I no longer ever think about it. The approach combines three layers of processing: 1. Voice activity detection, with a short (200ms) trigger. 2. A native audio turn detection model that's small, fast, and runs on CPU. This model captures audio nuances like inflection and filler sounds that don't get transcribed. 3. A prompt mixin for the conversation LLM that decides turn completion based on conversation context. None of these are new. We've been using VAD for a long time. We trained the first version of the Pipecat Smart Turn native audio model in December 2024. And we've been experimenting with prompt-based large model turn detection (sometimes called "selective refusal") for more than a year. Now, the Smart Turn model and the SOTA LLMs we're using in voice agents have both gotten so good that using them together feels like we've finally "solved" turn detection. Mark also figured out how to elegantly apply a "single-token tagging" technique to this problem. We sometimes use single-token tagging in place of tool calling, when we need a near-zero latency programmatic trigger. Mark's Pipecat mixin defines three single-token characters and prompts the LLM to output exactly one of them at the beginning of every response. - ✓ means the agent should respond normally (immediately) - ○ is a "short incomplete" - the agent should wait 5 seconds - ◐ is a "long incomplete" - the agent should wait 10 seconds The wait times, and the details of the prompt, are configurable, of course. Watch the video to see me talk to an agent that handles all my various pauses and inflections, plus phrases like "let me think," pretty much the way a person would handle them, in terms of response latency. Also, in the second half of the video, I ask the agent to adjust its response pattern because I'm going to tell it a phone number. This kind of "in-context" adjustment of response wait times is really useful. The LLM in the video is GTP-4.1. We've tested the prompt and single-token adherance with GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5, and AWS Nova 2 Pro. Note that older models in all these families (and, in general, smaller open weights models) aren't able to reliably output these single-token tags. But the new models we're using these days are pretty amazing.
4:39

Voice AI turn taking is a solved problem. The single most common complaint about voice AI, today, is that agents interrupt too often. But the voice agents I build for myself now respond quickly and interrupt me less often than the people I talk to every day. (I actually measured this.) Mark Backman made a Pipecat AI PR two weeks ago that was the last piece of the puzzle for turn taking so good that I no longer ever think about it. The approach combines three layers of processing: 1. Voice activity detection, with a short (200ms) trigger. 2. A native audio turn detection model that's small, fast, and runs on CPU. This model captures audio nuances like inflection and filler sounds that don't get transcribed. 3. A prompt mixin for the conversation LLM that decides turn completion based on conversation context. None of these are new. We've been using VAD for a long time. We trained the first version of the Pipecat Smart Turn native audio model in December 2024. And we've been experimenting with prompt-based large model turn detection (sometimes called "selective refusal") for more than a year. Now, the Smart Turn model and the SOTA LLMs we're using in voice agents have both gotten so good that using them together feels like we've finally "solved" turn detection. Mark also figured out how to elegantly apply a "single-token tagging" technique to this problem. We sometimes use single-token tagging in place of tool calling, when we need a near-zero latency programmatic trigger. Mark's Pipecat mixin defines three single-token characters and prompts the LLM to output exactly one of them at the beginning of every response. - ✓ means the agent should respond normally (immediately) - ○ is a "short incomplete" - the agent should wait 5 seconds - ◐ is a "long incomplete" - the agent should wait 10 seconds The wait times, and the details of the prompt, are configurable, of course. Watch the video to see me talk to an agent that handles all my various pauses and inflections, plus phrases like "let me think," pretty much the way a person would handle them, in terms of response latency. Also, in the second half of the video, I ask the agent to adjust its response pattern because I'm going to tell it a phone number. This kind of "in-context" adjustment of response wait times is really useful. The LLM in the video is GTP-4.1. We've tested the prompt and single-token adherance with GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5, and AWS Nova 2 Pro. Note that older models in all these families (and, in general, smaller open weights models) aren't able to reliably output these single-token tags. But the new models we're using these days are pretty amazing.

kwindla

27,016 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

NVIDIA just released a new open source transcription model, Nemotron Speech ASR, designed from the ground up for low-latency use cases like voice agents. Here's a voice agent built with this new model. 24ms transcription finalization and total voice-to-voice inference time under 500ms. This agent actually uses *three* NVIDIA open source models: - Nemotron Speech ASR - Nemotron 3 Nano 30GB in a 4-bit quant (released in December) - A preview checkpoint of the upcoming Magpie text-to-speech model These models are all truly open source: weights, training data, training code, and inference code. This is a big deal! Jensen said in the CES keynote yesterday that he expects open source models to catch up to proprietary models this year in a number of categories. NVIDIA is putting their weight behind making this happen. (As Alan Kay said, the best way to predict the future is to invent it.) The code for this agent is open source too, of course. You can deploy it to production with Modal and Pipecat AI cloud, or run locally on an NVIDIA DGX Spark or RTX 5090.
1:24

NVIDIA just released a new open source transcription model, Nemotron Speech ASR, designed from the ground up for low-latency use cases like voice agents. Here's a voice agent built with this new model. 24ms transcription finalization and total voice-to-voice inference time under 500ms. This agent actually uses *three* NVIDIA open source models: - Nemotron Speech ASR - Nemotron 3 Nano 30GB in a 4-bit quant (released in December) - A preview checkpoint of the upcoming Magpie text-to-speech model These models are all truly open source: weights, training data, training code, and inference code. This is a big deal! Jensen said in the CES keynote yesterday that he expects open source models to catch up to proprietary models this year in a number of categories. NVIDIA is putting their weight behind making this happen. (As Alan Kay said, the best way to predict the future is to invent it.) The code for this agent is open source too, of course. You can deploy it to production with Modal and Pipecat AI cloud, or run locally on an NVIDIA DGX Spark or RTX 5090.

kwindla

274,679 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Better/faster/cheaper voice AI turn detection with Gemini 2.0 The code that determines when the agent should respond to the user is some of the most important code in your voice AI agent. The technical terms for this job are "turn detection" or "phrase endpointing." If the voice AI responds before the user has finished their thought, the conversation is choppy and unproductive. If the AI waits too long, the conversation is slow and frustrating. There are a number of ways to approach this. You can: 1. Use a fast "voice activity detection" model to detect pauses in speech. Respond when the user pauses. 2. Use a specialized phrase endpointing model that operates on transcribed text, pattern-matching on text semantics. 3. Train a specialized phrase endpointing model that operates directly on audio. 4. Leverage the native audio capabilities of a SOTA LLM like Gemini 2.0. We've benchmarked all four of these, and Gemini 2.0 currently beats other approaches. Using Gemini is also cheaper than transcribing the audio separately using a transcription service or model. Here's a short video showing Gemini phrase endpointing in two scenarios. First, correctly handling pauses in natural conversation. Second, requesting a phone number (which is a common activity in a use case like customer support). You can see the Completeness check lines in the terminal output, printed each time Gemini processes a chunk of audio.
1:23

Better/faster/cheaper voice AI turn detection with Gemini 2.0 The code that determines when the agent should respond to the user is some of the most important code in your voice AI agent. The technical terms for this job are "turn detection" or "phrase endpointing." If the voice AI responds before the user has finished their thought, the conversation is choppy and unproductive. If the AI waits too long, the conversation is slow and frustrating. There are a number of ways to approach this. You can: 1. Use a fast "voice activity detection" model to detect pauses in speech. Respond when the user pauses. 2. Use a specialized phrase endpointing model that operates on transcribed text, pattern-matching on text semantics. 3. Train a specialized phrase endpointing model that operates directly on audio. 4. Leverage the native audio capabilities of a SOTA LLM like Gemini 2.0. We've benchmarked all four of these, and Gemini 2.0 currently beats other approaches. Using Gemini is also cheaper than transcribing the audio separately using a transcription service or model. Here's a short video showing Gemini phrase endpointing in two scenarios. First, correctly handling pauses in natural conversation. Second, requesting a phone number (which is a common activity in a use case like customer support). You can see the Completeness check lines in the terminal output, printed each time Gemini processes a chunk of audio.

kwindla

64,190 просмотров • 1 год назад

Very, very fast voice bots. Llama 3.1 running on Groq Inc. 🚀 500ms voice-to-voice response times
1:52

Very, very fast voice bots. Llama 3.1 running on Groq Inc. 🚀 500ms voice-to-voice response times

kwindla

386,556 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Async, automatic, non-blocking context compaction for long-running agents. Last week I gave a talk called Space Machine Sandboxes at the Daytona AI builders meetup about patterns for long-running agents. I work a lot on voice AI agents, which are fundamentally multi-turn, long-context loops. I also build lots of other AI agent stuff, often as part of bigger systems that include voice. One of the patterns I showed in the talk is non-blocking compaction. Here's a short clip.
1:46

Async, automatic, non-blocking context compaction for long-running agents. Last week I gave a talk called Space Machine Sandboxes at the Daytona AI builders meetup about patterns for long-running agents. I work a lot on voice AI agents, which are fundamentally multi-turn, long-context loops. I also build lots of other AI agent stuff, often as part of bigger systems that include voice. One of the patterns I showed in the talk is non-blocking compaction. Here's a short clip.

kwindla

25,877 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Voice-only programming with the new OpenAI Realtime API ... I spend a lot of time these days pair programming with LLMs. Often I'm talking rather than typing. This "voice dictation" use case has become an important vibe benchmark for me. Being able to create text input just by talking, flexibly, in a context dependent way, with tool calling, is a *hard* problem for today's models. Natural language dictation requires a very high degree of contextual intelligence, instruction following accuracy, and tool calling reliability. Today's new gpt-realtime model is quite good at this hard problem. The original realtime model release last year was impressive. Seeing what a speech-to-speech model could do got a lot of people excited about the possibilities of voice AI. The improvements since that first release are equally impressive. I can use this new model, now, for real world tasks that were past the edge of the "jagged frontier" before. Here's a video showing a couple of fun (and tricky) modes of voice input.
2:40

Voice-only programming with the new OpenAI Realtime API ... I spend a lot of time these days pair programming with LLMs. Often I'm talking rather than typing. This "voice dictation" use case has become an important vibe benchmark for me. Being able to create text input just by talking, flexibly, in a context dependent way, with tool calling, is a *hard* problem for today's models. Natural language dictation requires a very high degree of contextual intelligence, instruction following accuracy, and tool calling reliability. Today's new gpt-realtime model is quite good at this hard problem. The original realtime model release last year was impressive. Seeing what a speech-to-speech model could do got a lot of people excited about the possibilities of voice AI. The improvements since that first release are equally impressive. I can use this new model, now, for real world tasks that were past the edge of the "jagged frontier" before. Here's a video showing a couple of fun (and tricky) modes of voice input.

kwindla

50,874 просмотров • 1 год назад

OpenAI shipped a new speech-to-speech model today: gpt-realtime-2 This is the first speech-to-speech model good enough to use in my voice agents that do "real work." Or real play, for that matter. Here's gpt-realtime-2 as the brain of the ship AI in Gradient Bang. The voice-to-voice response and tool calling times here are unedited, so you can see exactly what the interaction with the model is like in an agent with a very complex system instruction and frequent tool calls. (I did clip out the subagent task execution segments, after gpt-realtime-2 starts a subagent via a tool call. Subagents in this config used gpt-5.2 "medium" effort.)
3:13

OpenAI shipped a new speech-to-speech model today: gpt-realtime-2 This is the first speech-to-speech model good enough to use in my voice agents that do "real work." Or real play, for that matter. Here's gpt-realtime-2 as the brain of the ship AI in Gradient Bang. The voice-to-voice response and tool calling times here are unedited, so you can see exactly what the interaction with the model is like in an agent with a very complex system instruction and frequent tool calls. (I did clip out the subagent task execution segments, after gpt-realtime-2 starts a subagent via a tool call. Subagents in this config used gpt-5.2 "medium" effort.)

kwindla

55,222 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

What Lisa Su actually held on stage: A mini PC the size of a lunchbox running Qwen3-235B locally, with no cloud and no discrete GPU Inside: the Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 128GB unified memory, 110GB usable as VRAM on Linux The first x86 chip that handles 200+ billion parameters on a single die AMD claims it beats the RTX 5080 by several times on memory-bound models — because the 5080 simply cannot fit them $1,400 to $2,500 once. cloud bills run $200 to $400 a month It pays for itself in a few months, then costs nothing per request This is not a faster GPU. it is the first real argument that your AI does not belong in someone else's data center
0:31

What Lisa Su actually held on stage: A mini PC the size of a lunchbox running Qwen3-235B locally, with no cloud and no discrete GPU Inside: the Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 128GB unified memory, 110GB usable as VRAM on Linux The first x86 chip that handles 200+ billion parameters on a single die AMD claims it beats the RTX 5080 by several times on memory-bound models — because the 5080 simply cannot fit them $1,400 to $2,500 once. cloud bills run $200 to $400 a month It pays for itself in a few months, then costs nothing per request This is not a faster GPU. it is the first real argument that your AI does not belong in someone else's data center

plutos

1,237,564 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

NVIDIA'S BIGGEST COMPETITOR AMD BUILT A BOX THAT RUNS A 235B MODEL AND KILLS $200 OPENAI AND $200 CLAUDE CODE FOR $9 A MONTH amd's ryzen ai max+ 395 is the first x86 chip that runs a 200 billion parameter model on a single piece of silicon with 128gb of unified memory the gmktec evo-x2 runs qwen3 235b fully, deepseek v3 comfortably and llama 3.3 70b with headroom. on linux you get 110gb of usable vram out of 128gb amd claimed the chip beat an nvidia rtx 5080 by more than 3x on deepseek r1 inference. a lunchbox sized pc outrunning a $1,000 discrete gpu on a real ai workload a heavy ai user pays $200 for claude code max, $200 for chatgpt pro, $20 for cursor and $20 for gemini. that's $5,280 a year and the box pays itself off in 9 to 10 months ollama installs in one command and claude code points at localhost so nothing leaves the machine and nothing costs per request bookmark this and read the article below
1:06

NVIDIA'S BIGGEST COMPETITOR AMD BUILT A BOX THAT RUNS A 235B MODEL AND KILLS $200 OPENAI AND $200 CLAUDE CODE FOR $9 A MONTH amd's ryzen ai max+ 395 is the first x86 chip that runs a 200 billion parameter model on a single piece of silicon with 128gb of unified memory the gmktec evo-x2 runs qwen3 235b fully, deepseek v3 comfortably and llama 3.3 70b with headroom. on linux you get 110gb of usable vram out of 128gb amd claimed the chip beat an nvidia rtx 5080 by more than 3x on deepseek r1 inference. a lunchbox sized pc outrunning a $1,000 discrete gpu on a real ai workload a heavy ai user pays $200 for claude code max, $200 for chatgpt pro, $20 for cursor and $20 for gemini. that's $5,280 a year and the box pays itself off in 9 to 10 months ollama installs in one command and claude code points at localhost so nothing leaves the machine and nothing costs per request bookmark this and read the article below

starmex

93,465 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад