正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Major Debate On SC/ST Act The SC/ST Act, in its present form, is draconian because it allows an FIR and arrest without a preliminary inquiry, while severely restricting anticipatory bail. A law must deliver justice to everyone, and allegations of misuse cannot be ignored: Anand Ranganathan I have personally... show more

TIMES NOW

9,826,846 subscribers

23,482 次观看 • 5 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

14 条评论

mangoman 的头像

mangoman5 天前

Debating, sc/St act , ugc , is the only reason for cast discrimination In country where General cast voted for BJP n made a OBC PM ,CM AND SC/ST PRESIDENTS , MUSLIM PRESIDENT, SIKH PRESIDENT AND YOU TALK ABT CAST , RELIGION? INDIA WILL NEVER BE A VISHWA GURU OR EVEN A FIRST WORLD COUNTRY BY REJECTING MERIT

Pritam Thakur 的头像

Pritam Thakur4 天前

@grok who inserted section 18A provisions in SC/ST act and how arrest without investigation or official warrant is justified

keshav Singh 的头像

keshav Singh5 天前

I already said it—this channel will spend days debating the same topic every week. 🤣 He’s basically their permanent guest,@ARanganathan72 and @Nehalaldas hardly anyone even watches this channel. Just seat five Brahmins on a panel and let them debate the SC/ST Act. 🤣

akb 的头像

akb5 天前

@roypranesh what’s compulsion of calling avishkar singhi on debate on national tv ? What’s his credentials except son of a successful (?) lawyer but a failed politician named Abhishek Manu Singhvi ? कोई और अच्छा सम्मानीय वकील नहीं मिला !

INDIA &WORLD (🇮🇳 &🌎) 的头像

INDIA &WORLD (🇮🇳 &🌎)5 天前

This is a draconion law Abolish it

Naresh Kumar 的头像

Naresh Kumar4 天前

Salute to Anand sir

Iceberg in Volcano - Modi ka pariwar 的头像

Iceberg in Volcano - Modi ka pariwar5 天前

So Manoj Yadad simple mean, punish those misuse or use this Bad law with wrong intentions, whoever he/she may be. Great all MisUser of this law must be punished, I am with him.

veeru 的头像

veeru4 天前

The sc/st act ssshould be amended. There should be capital punishment in this act without enquiry. Direct capital punishment. That would be better.

Iamshonnad 的头像

Iamshonnad4 天前

Modi has created a tool for SCST to make money. No need to work, no Reservation required,no education required. Pickup fights with 10 persons file 10 case and become Crorepati #RHA #ModiAct_लगाओ_पैसा_कमाओ #ModiAct #SCSTAct @barandbench @barcouncilindia @barcouncilofup @BJP4India

Arnish gopal 的头像

Arnish gopal5 天前

Is this is a sanghi news channel?? All are upper caste and debate on sc/st act wow what a 🤣

S. S. 的头像

S. S.4 天前

@narendramodi

Mahender Kumar 的头像

Mahender Kumar4 天前

Very torturous

Mehul 🇮🇳 🆒️🌍 的头像

Mehul 🇮🇳 🆒️🌍5 天前

This act will destroy BJP and their voter base

Naren 的头像

Naren4 天前

@narendramodi

相关视频

Major Debate On SC/ST Act The SC/ST Act is being seriously misused. The compensation mechanism allows a substantial portion of the money to reach the complainant even before the case is proven in court: Dr. Neha Das The SC/ST Act is essential to protect vulnerable communities, but allegations of misuse must be examined through due process without undermining genuine cases: Rajkumar Rajan tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

Major Debate On SC/ST Act The SC/ST Act is being seriously misused. The compensation mechanism allows a substantial portion of the money to reach the complainant even before the case is proven in court: Dr. Neha Das The SC/ST Act is essential to protect vulnerable communities, but allegations of misuse must be examined through due process without undermining genuine cases: Rajkumar Rajan tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

TIMES NOW

27,339 次观看 • 5 天前

"What Congress did with Shahbano case, exactly same thing BJP did with Subhash Kashinath Mahajan case in SC/ST act. Judiciary cannot prevent the misuse of a law if govt goes & passes amendments to overturn it's judgements." Debate on SC/ST act on Timesnow with Pranesh Kumar Roy

"What Congress did with Shahbano case, exactly same thing BJP did with Subhash Kashinath Mahajan case in SC/ST act. Judiciary cannot prevent the misuse of a law if govt goes & passes amendments to overturn it's judgements." Debate on SC/ST act on Timesnow with Pranesh Kumar Roy

Dr. Neha Das

19,226 次观看 • 5 天前

🚨 LANDMARK Supreme Court Ruling: “An incident inside a private house does not constitute an offence under the SC/ST Act.” Court further held that the SC/ST Act alone cannot automatically DENY ANTICIPATORY BAIL. - Courts must first check prima facie if a real offence is made out before rejecting pre-arrest bail. A major check on misuse of the stringent law. Significant relief in many cases🎯

🚨 LANDMARK Supreme Court Ruling: “An incident inside a private house does not constitute an offence under the SC/ST Act.” Court further held that the SC/ST Act alone cannot automatically DENY ANTICIPATORY BAIL. - Courts must first check prima facie if a real offence is made out before rejecting pre-arrest bail. A major check on misuse of the stringent law. Significant relief in many cases🎯

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

80,860 次观看 • 4 个月前

Bhavna Mishra, a gold medalist has been dragged into a false case under the SC/ST Act. Five years of court dates, allegations and mental pressure. No relief. No closure. Just exhaustion. This is what misuse of the law looks like when the system refuses to listen. Stop the misuse of the SC/ST Act. UGC Rollback. Narendra Modi

Bhavna Mishra, a gold medalist has been dragged into a false case under the SC/ST Act. Five years of court dates, allegations and mental pressure. No relief. No closure. Just exhaustion. This is what misuse of the law looks like when the system refuses to listen. Stop the misuse of the SC/ST Act. UGC Rollback. Narendra Modi

×̷̷͜×̷

17,776 次观看 • 15 天前

It’s Time to Unite Against False SC/ST Act Cases - General Janta party Everywhere I look, I’m seeing reports of people allegedly being falsely booked under the SC/ST Act. It genuinely concerns me. Some of these people may not share our ideology at all. We may disagree with them politically on almost everything. But when it comes to justice, that doesn’t matter. If we believe someone has been falsely implicated, we should still stand for their right to a fair investigation and a fair chance to defend themselves. And I keep thinking if people with money, influence and resources can struggle to get bail, what happens to an ordinary poor person caught in such a case? Real victims of caste atrocities absolutely deserve justice. But innocent people also deserve protection from false cases and misuse of the law. This is bigger than party politics. It’s time for people across the political divide to unite and speak for a fairer system and serious SC/ST Act reform. Justice should protect the victim without punishing the innocent.

It’s Time to Unite Against False SC/ST Act Cases - General Janta party Everywhere I look, I’m seeing reports of people allegedly being falsely booked under the SC/ST Act. It genuinely concerns me. Some of these people may not share our ideology at all. We may disagree with them politically on almost everything. But when it comes to justice, that doesn’t matter. If we believe someone has been falsely implicated, we should still stand for their right to a fair investigation and a fair chance to defend themselves. And I keep thinking if people with money, influence and resources can struggle to get bail, what happens to an ordinary poor person caught in such a case? Real victims of caste atrocities absolutely deserve justice. But innocent people also deserve protection from false cases and misuse of the law. This is bigger than party politics. It’s time for people across the political divide to unite and speak for a fairer system and serious SC/ST Act reform. Justice should protect the victim without punishing the innocent.

General Janta Party

13,373 次观看 • 7 天前

🚨Why case has been filed under SC-ST ACT against Swatantra Bhardwaj? SC-ST ACT can't be used for personal matters, even if you are a Dalit. Do CJP has any such evidence against Swatantra Bhardwaj, in which caste was the reason of fight between Swatantra Bhardwaj and Sanjay Azad? It's clearly the misuse of SC-ST ACT. How Delhi Police can accept this case? Action should be taken against CJP and Saurav Das for misusing SC-ST ACT. Three times CLAT failed Saurav Das doesn't even know about SC-ST ACT.

🚨Why case has been filed under SC-ST ACT against Swatantra Bhardwaj? SC-ST ACT can't be used for personal matters, even if you are a Dalit. Do CJP has any such evidence against Swatantra Bhardwaj, in which caste was the reason of fight between Swatantra Bhardwaj and Sanjay Azad? It's clearly the misuse of SC-ST ACT. How Delhi Police can accept this case? Action should be taken against CJP and Saurav Das for misusing SC-ST ACT. Three times CLAT failed Saurav Das doesn't even know about SC-ST ACT.

Aditya

17,302 次观看 • 11 天前

SC-ST Act Horror Continues! Now in Kasganj, UP, 37 Thakurs have been booked under the SC-ST Act. Per reports, rumours spread in the village that an Ambedkar statue had been vandalised. DM Pranay Singh and SP OP Singh reached with force, inspected the statue and confirmed it was intact. Thakurs say they were the ones misbehaved with first, and that the SC/ST case was slapped on 38 people without a proper preliminary inquiry. They are demanding a neutral probe.

SC-ST Act Horror Continues! Now in Kasganj, UP, 37 Thakurs have been booked under the SC-ST Act. Per reports, rumours spread in the village that an Ambedkar statue had been vandalised. DM Pranay Singh and SP OP Singh reached with force, inspected the statue and confirmed it was intact. Thakurs say they were the ones misbehaved with first, and that the SC/ST case was slapped on 38 people without a proper preliminary inquiry. They are demanding a neutral probe.

Treeni

47,399 次观看 • 13 天前

Live misuse of the SC-ST act caught on camera. See how a DaIit govt employee is asking an Advocate to frame his senior under a false case of the atrocity act. It happened while I was travelling with my advocate friend. Suddenly someone called and asked about filing a false case. He said his senior, from the OBC community, is not granting him more holidays and he wants to send him to jail in a false SC-ST act. He kept insisting that how a grievous case be framed against his senior. This is very alarming how people are using this act to take revenge on seniors in the workplace.

Live misuse of the SC-ST act caught on camera. See how a DaIit govt employee is asking an Advocate to frame his senior under a false case of the atrocity act. It happened while I was travelling with my advocate friend. Suddenly someone called and asked about filing a false case. He said his senior, from the OBC community, is not granting him more holidays and he wants to send him to jail in a false SC-ST act. He kept insisting that how a grievous case be framed against his senior. This is very alarming how people are using this act to take revenge on seniors in the workplace.

Shubham Sharma

137,561 次观看 • 1 年前

Government data shows that 71.5% of agricultural land is owned by SC, ST and OBC communities: Dr. Neha Das Reservations must be provided through additional seats so that they do not affect the merit-based selection process...- Anand Ranganathan tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

Government data shows that 71.5% of agricultural land is owned by SC, ST and OBC communities: Dr. Neha Das Reservations must be provided through additional seats so that they do not affect the merit-based selection process...- Anand Ranganathan tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

TIMES NOW

29,724 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is Vishnu Tiwari, a poor Brahmin He spent 20 years in a jail under a fake SC/ST atrocities act. SC/St act was introduced in parliament in1987 by Rajiv gandhi govt. SC/ST act was enacted by parliament into law by VP singh & BJP govt in 1989. In 2015, Modi govt amended this act and made it ultra draconian , it's framework is similar to that of communal violence bill that Sonia gandhi had planned for hindus. On 20th March 2018, considering the draconian nature of the act, the Supreme Court stopped immediate arrest under this act. But Modi govt overruled Supreme Court judgement through an ordinance and made it super draconian. Since then so many OBC and GC hindus have been sent to jail under this new act Most cases are False. Lives and Families being destroyed under hisab chukta policies.

This is Vishnu Tiwari, a poor Brahmin He spent 20 years in a jail under a fake SC/ST atrocities act. SC/St act was introduced in parliament in1987 by Rajiv gandhi govt. SC/ST act was enacted by parliament into law by VP singh & BJP govt in 1989. In 2015, Modi govt amended this act and made it ultra draconian , it's framework is similar to that of communal violence bill that Sonia gandhi had planned for hindus. On 20th March 2018, considering the draconian nature of the act, the Supreme Court stopped immediate arrest under this act. But Modi govt overruled Supreme Court judgement through an ordinance and made it super draconian. Since then so many OBC and GC hindus have been sent to jail under this new act Most cases are False. Lives and Families being destroyed under hisab chukta policies.

Ritu #सत्यसाधक

43,833 次观看 • 2 年前

SC-ST Act: "This is Business!" In Samastipur, Bihar, an SC-ST individual filed a case against someone and was hoping for Govt compensation. But the data operator started demanding a bribe of 50k to release the amount. The conversation took place while SC-ST Welfare Minister Lakhendra Paswan was also listening to the conversation.

SC-ST Act: "This is Business!" In Samastipur, Bihar, an SC-ST individual filed a case against someone and was hoping for Govt compensation. But the data operator started demanding a bribe of 50k to release the amount. The conversation took place while SC-ST Welfare Minister Lakhendra Paswan was also listening to the conversation.

Angry Saffron

145,535 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is what SC ST act is doing with Hindus All Hindu castes of Bhind(MP) have boycotted the Jatavs for imposing back to back false SC ST Act cases on OBCs and GCs. The decision was taken by the members of all castes in a meeting after three minors were booked in the atrocity case.

This is what SC ST act is doing with Hindus All Hindu castes of Bhind(MP) have boycotted the Jatavs for imposing back to back false SC ST Act cases on OBCs and GCs. The decision was taken by the members of all castes in a meeting after three minors were booked in the atrocity case.

Shubham Sharma

111,062 次观看 • 6 个月前

Did you know? -In SC/ST act, 75% compensation money is paid before the case is proven in Court (25% on FIR, 50% on filing chargesheet). -& There is no mechanism to recover money in fake cases. And FYI, I was threatened under SC/ST act for saying this in an online show 😂😂😂

Did you know? -In SC/ST act, 75% compensation money is paid before the case is proven in Court (25% on FIR, 50% on filing chargesheet). -& There is no mechanism to recover money in fake cases. And FYI, I was threatened under SC/ST act for saying this in an online show 😂😂😂

Dr. Neha Das

83,904 次观看 • 6 天前

Twenty SC/ST MPs are at Parliament Street Police Station to file a Zero FIR for an act of untouchability, punishable under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, committed against Congress President Shri Mallikarjun Kharge at Haldwani on 10th Aug 2026. Even after two hours of persuasion, the SHO refuses to register the Zero FIR and refuses to give reasons in writing. If this is how SC/ST MPs are treated, imagine the plight of an ordinary SC/ST citizen trying to register an FIR for an atrocity. 📍 New Delhi

Twenty SC/ST MPs are at Parliament Street Police Station to file a Zero FIR for an act of untouchability, punishable under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, committed against Congress President Shri Mallikarjun Kharge at Haldwani on 10th Aug 2026. Even after two hours of persuasion, the SHO refuses to register the Zero FIR and refuses to give reasons in writing. If this is how SC/ST MPs are treated, imagine the plight of an ordinary SC/ST citizen trying to register an FIR for an atrocity. 📍 New Delhi

Congress

99,322 次观看 • 7 天前

Reposting this because the questions raised by this incident still haven’t gone away. Danveer Jatav, associated with Bhim Army, was accused of entering a temple during Ram Navami, allegedly vandalising Maa Durga’s idol, abusing Brahmins and threatening villagers by invoking the SC/ST Act. Meanwhile, Modi Ji keeps making the SC/ST Act “stronger.” 😏 When will misuse of the law against innocent people be taken seriously? #StopMisuseOfSCSTAct

Reposting this because the questions raised by this incident still haven’t gone away. Danveer Jatav, associated with Bhim Army, was accused of entering a temple during Ram Navami, allegedly vandalising Maa Durga’s idol, abusing Brahmins and threatening villagers by invoking the SC/ST Act. Meanwhile, Modi Ji keeps making the SC/ST Act “stronger.” 😏 When will misuse of the law against innocent people be taken seriously? #StopMisuseOfSCSTAct

Thor Odinson

12,503 次观看 • 22 天前

David Jatav from Aligarh posts abusive videos full of casteist slurs on Facebook and Instagram. Law student Mayur Garg gave a complaint against him in the local police station and in return David attacked him with his goons. And now David managed to lodge one more FIR against Mayur through his wife under SC-ST Act claiming that Mayur commented on the post of his wife on Instagram. Can there be a better reason to lodge an FIR under SC/ST Act against someone? Mayur Garg alleged that David Jatav was threatening him since long to withdraw his complaint or face a case of SC/ST Act. Kind attn DGP UP CM Office, GoUP

David Jatav from Aligarh posts abusive videos full of casteist slurs on Facebook and Instagram. Law student Mayur Garg gave a complaint against him in the local police station and in return David attacked him with his goons. And now David managed to lodge one more FIR against Mayur through his wife under SC-ST Act claiming that Mayur commented on the post of his wife on Instagram. Can there be a better reason to lodge an FIR under SC/ST Act against someone? Mayur Garg alleged that David Jatav was threatening him since long to withdraw his complaint or face a case of SC/ST Act. Kind attn DGP UP CM Office, GoUP

NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs

29,695 次观看 • 6 个月前

BHAVNA MISHRA BROKE, TIRED, AND STILL FIGHTING THE SYSTEM Bhavna Mishra, a gold medalist, has been dragged into a false case under the SC ST Act. Five years of court dates, allegations, and mental pressure. No relief. No closure. Just exhaustion. This is what misuse of the law looks like when the system refuses to listen. 💔

BHAVNA MISHRA BROKE, TIRED, AND STILL FIGHTING THE SYSTEM Bhavna Mishra, a gold medalist, has been dragged into a false case under the SC ST Act. Five years of court dates, allegations, and mental pressure. No relief. No closure. Just exhaustion. This is what misuse of the law looks like when the system refuses to listen. 💔

RHA Reforms

27,663 次观看 • 1 个月前

The 'Creamy Layer' Debate The ST and SC reservations both have an economic criterion. It is mentioned that economic backwardness is one of the criteria, which debunks the narrative that economic criteria cannot be used for sub-classification under SC-ST reservation: Dr. Neha Das The big question is, when the reservation policy was brought with the intention, has that been fulfilled?: Rajkumar Rajan tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

The 'Creamy Layer' Debate The ST and SC reservations both have an economic criterion. It is mentioned that economic backwardness is one of the criteria, which debunks the narrative that economic criteria cannot be used for sub-classification under SC-ST reservation: Dr. Neha Das The big question is, when the reservation policy was brought with the intention, has that been fulfilled?: Rajkumar Rajan tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

TIMES NOW

209,820 次观看 • 1 个月前

I Stand With Swatantra Bhardwaj 🐯🔥 As an advocate, I have a genuine legal question regarding the Swatantra Bhardwaj case. Under Section 34 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), an act done in exercise of the right of private defence is not an offence. Sections 35–40 further define when and to what extent this right can be exercised. So, if the factual defence is that the accused acted in lawful private defence, that defence necessarily requires examination before concluding criminal liability. But here is the important legal question: If the underlying act is ultimately found to be protected by lawful private defence, what is the legal basis for sustaining an offence under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act? The SC/ST Act does not make every dispute or assault involving an SC/ST person automatically an offence under the Act. The specific ingredients of the relevant provision must be satisfied. Therefore, the questions for investigation and ultimately the Court are: What specific offence under Section 3 of the SC/ST Act is alleged? What are the factual ingredients supporting that particular provision? Was the alleged act committed with the requisite caste-related intent/knowledge, where required? Was there an immediate threat giving rise to a lawful right of private defence? Was the force used proportionate to the threat, or did it exceed the limits prescribed by law? A claim of self-defence is not an automatic acquittal, but equally, registration/invocation of the SC/ST Act cannot substitute for proving the statutory ingredients of the offence. And most importantly, for every citizen: If you get into a physical dispute with anyone, including a person belonging to SC/ST, do not assume that you have no right to defend yourself. But do not use excessive force either. Preserve CCTV/video evidence, identify independent witnesses, seek medical examination immediately if injured, make your own complaint/counter-complaint where legally warranted, and consult a criminal lawyer before making statements on social media. The law protects the right of private defence, but only within its statutory limits. Delhi Police Rekha Gupta

I Stand With Swatantra Bhardwaj 🐯🔥 As an advocate, I have a genuine legal question regarding the Swatantra Bhardwaj case. Under Section 34 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), an act done in exercise of the right of private defence is not an offence. Sections 35–40 further define when and to what extent this right can be exercised. So, if the factual defence is that the accused acted in lawful private defence, that defence necessarily requires examination before concluding criminal liability. But here is the important legal question: If the underlying act is ultimately found to be protected by lawful private defence, what is the legal basis for sustaining an offence under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act? The SC/ST Act does not make every dispute or assault involving an SC/ST person automatically an offence under the Act. The specific ingredients of the relevant provision must be satisfied. Therefore, the questions for investigation and ultimately the Court are: What specific offence under Section 3 of the SC/ST Act is alleged? What are the factual ingredients supporting that particular provision? Was the alleged act committed with the requisite caste-related intent/knowledge, where required? Was there an immediate threat giving rise to a lawful right of private defence? Was the force used proportionate to the threat, or did it exceed the limits prescribed by law? A claim of self-defence is not an automatic acquittal, but equally, registration/invocation of the SC/ST Act cannot substitute for proving the statutory ingredients of the offence. And most importantly, for every citizen: If you get into a physical dispute with anyone, including a person belonging to SC/ST, do not assume that you have no right to defend yourself. But do not use excessive force either. Preserve CCTV/video evidence, identify independent witnesses, seek medical examination immediately if injured, make your own complaint/counter-complaint where legally warranted, and consult a criminal lawyer before making statements on social media. The law protects the right of private defence, but only within its statutory limits. Delhi Police Rekha Gupta

ADV. ASHUTOSH J. DUBEY 🇮🇳

24,923 次观看 • 11 天前

"Fake news against SC-ST Act." 🚨 "Why SC-ST Act imposed on Brahmins?"🚨 Manu media and caste Hindus are spewing hate against Dalits over Darbhanga case. DSP Prabhakar Tiwari, who is himself a Brahmin, explained the truth. This is not the Manu era. If you practice casteism against Dalits, you'll be arrested under SC-ST Act. Why do you think being a Brahmin makes you superior or gives you the freedom to commit crimes against Dalits? Casteism is a form of terrorism, and there should be zero tolerance for it. The govt also follow the same. Cope. The SC-ST community is witnessing the hatred and misinformation by caste Hindus and Manu Media being spread. Boycott any belief system or media channel that spreads false narratives or dehumanizes you.

"Fake news against SC-ST Act." 🚨 "Why SC-ST Act imposed on Brahmins?"🚨 Manu media and caste Hindus are spewing hate against Dalits over Darbhanga case. DSP Prabhakar Tiwari, who is himself a Brahmin, explained the truth. This is not the Manu era. If you practice casteism against Dalits, you'll be arrested under SC-ST Act. Why do you think being a Brahmin makes you superior or gives you the freedom to commit crimes against Dalits? Casteism is a form of terrorism, and there should be zero tolerance for it. The govt also follow the same. Cope. The SC-ST community is witnessing the hatred and misinformation by caste Hindus and Manu Media being spread. Boycott any belief system or media channel that spreads false narratives or dehumanizes you.

Suraj Kumar Bauddh

26,585 次观看 • 7 个月前