Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

If DA Michael Morrissey’s Office thought calling Trooper Yuri Bukhenik over its Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor, was a wise decision, can you even imagine how bad Trooper Proctor must be then? #KarenReadTrial “I’m not Trooper Proctor” —Yuri Bukhenik In an impressively artful moment, Attorney Alan Jackson gets Yuri Bukhenik... to remind us all that he is not the Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor. Where is their Lead Investigator, Trooper Michael Proctor? What are they hiding? Why are they hiding him? - Going into 7th week of trial - Still no crimes proven - No cause of death - No accident reconstruction - Multiple doctored/lost/destroyed surveillance videos - LOTS of evidence of a coverup Do legitimate prosecutions, motivated by the pursuit of justice, hide witnesses? If the Commonwealth doesn’t call its Lead Investigator on a murder investigation, THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. 👇🏼SEE the clip: the closed captioning/subtitles wanted to take some creative liberty 😉🤷🏻‍♀️ #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenReadshow more

Olivia

28,143 subscribers

121,332 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

#KarenReadTrial

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Mrobinson2 years ago

Loved that part🤣 AJ is f’n w/ him🤣

Bill -_-2 years ago

Morrissey and his gang of thugs being mocked by Jackson is everything.

Jaime2 years ago

They called the Sullivan Sisters before the officers who actually "investigated" John's death.

M.A. Rothman1 year ago

"If you like Jack Reacher or Dirk Pitt, you must meet Levi Yoder." - Kevin J. Anderson, New York Times bestselling author. #MArothman #LeviYoder #thriller #operasinger

*~The~Truth~Is~Always~The~Strongest~Argument~*2 years ago

💀

Pickie2 years ago

Can't wait for Monday will Lally plunge on or Dismiss all charges? now it's got really interesting

Don Knight2 years ago

If Proctor Trooper lies, he’s in trouble; if he tells the truth, he’s in trouble. That’s why they’re dragging their feet. They put, Don’t call me Buknik” up before him as sort of a trial run. I’m sure Proctor is studying Buknik’s testimony.

john2 years ago

Blows my mind that people are throwing away their careers to protect these people

Annemarie Grant2 years ago

@MA_Recall @LanaDelTurtle_ @MazzaMedia @TGlarer @TheYoungJurks @DropMicrodots @TedDanielnews DONT IGNORE THESE CASES! ALL SAME THE INVESTIGATORS! These are the PATTERNS & PRACTICES of the #NorfolkDA Morrissey’s office! #JustonRoot #JohnOKeefe #SandraBirchmore #Bukhenik

jukeboxgrad2 years ago

YB's a liar. On Wed, he was the driver. On Thu, he said: "I think that's the tow-truck driver. He would have the only access to the vehicle, we did not touch the vehicle." AJ pointed out the contradiction and YB denied it.

Related Videos

WOW. JUST WOW. Michael Proctor is confronted with his text messages from August of 2022 where a photo of #KarenRead’s Attorney David Yannetti was sent & he replies “I truly hate him”. In a jaw dropping moment Attorney Alan Jackson asks Proctor: “How do you feel about him (Attorney Yannetti) now? He’s sitting right there” Shockingly, Proctor responds: “I still don’t care for him now!” ——————— Wow. What a classy, unbiased professional. Look at the absolute “shock and horrah” on everyone’s faces upon hearing such a response! What a total piece of human garbage. If this wasn’t a coverup, then why did Michael Proctor clearly have such vitriol and emotional disdain for some Attorney of a defendant he didn’t know, in an investigation with other people he supposedly didn’t know? Oh wait, we now know that was a lie and this “unbiased” Lead Investigator was anything but! Question: Why would a Lead Investigator on a homicide have such disdain for the legal counsel a defendant hires, if he doesn’t have a personal stake in the outcome like he would if he were covering up a murder for his friends and framing an innocent woman so that THEY, his “second family” don’t go down? Did he have such disdain for Attorney David Yannetti because he is one of the top criminal defense attorneys in the country, and Proctor became scared knowing his sloppy coverup was more likely to become exposed with the better the Attorneys Karen Read retained? And that angered him because he just wanted her to keel over and submit—be their scapegoat goddamn*t! Well Michael Proctor, welcome to hell! Because Attorneys Alan Jackson, David Yannetti and Elizabeth Little—WE AIN’T GOT NO QUIT! #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption #MichaelProctor #MassachusettsStatePolice

WOW. JUST WOW. Michael Proctor is confronted with his text messages from August of 2022 where a photo of #KarenRead’s Attorney David Yannetti was sent & he replies “I truly hate him”. In a jaw dropping moment Attorney Alan Jackson asks Proctor: “How do you feel about him (Attorney Yannetti) now? He’s sitting right there” Shockingly, Proctor responds: “I still don’t care for him now!” ——————— Wow. What a classy, unbiased professional. Look at the absolute “shock and horrah” on everyone’s faces upon hearing such a response! What a total piece of human garbage. If this wasn’t a coverup, then why did Michael Proctor clearly have such vitriol and emotional disdain for some Attorney of a defendant he didn’t know, in an investigation with other people he supposedly didn’t know? Oh wait, we now know that was a lie and this “unbiased” Lead Investigator was anything but! Question: Why would a Lead Investigator on a homicide have such disdain for the legal counsel a defendant hires, if he doesn’t have a personal stake in the outcome like he would if he were covering up a murder for his friends and framing an innocent woman so that THEY, his “second family” don’t go down? Did he have such disdain for Attorney David Yannetti because he is one of the top criminal defense attorneys in the country, and Proctor became scared knowing his sloppy coverup was more likely to become exposed with the better the Attorneys Karen Read retained? And that angered him because he just wanted her to keel over and submit—be their scapegoat goddamn*t! Well Michael Proctor, welcome to hell! Because Attorneys Alan Jackson, David Yannetti and Elizabeth Little—WE AIN’T GOT NO QUIT! #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption #MichaelProctor #MassachusettsStatePolice

Olivia

476,977 views • 2 years ago

Why is Michael Proctor still employed by the Massachusetts State Police? Why is his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, commenting on an open investigation he’s involved in and heavily conflicted on? Why does Elizabeth Proctor—someone who doesn’t, nor did she ever, know #KarenRead have such illogical animus toward her when it was her own husband whose conduct was reprehensible & created all of the problems in this case? Yet she “fully supports” her husband? 😂 Why does Elizabeth Proctor clearly appear to have a personal stake in the outcome of this case, or Karen Read being found guilty when she says “Karen Read is a murderer”? It’s no wonder Michael Proctor felt so comfortable to say and do such immoral and unethical things in this case. His own wife emboldens him! Have these people no shame? It is because of Michael Proctor and HIS actions that Officer #JohnOKeefe will never get proper justice, but apparently Michael and Elizabeth Proctor are the victims. QUESTION: Do you feel safer knowing Michael Proctor is a State Police Officer? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Why is Michael Proctor still employed by the Massachusetts State Police? Why is his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, commenting on an open investigation he’s involved in and heavily conflicted on? Why does Elizabeth Proctor—someone who doesn’t, nor did she ever, know #KarenRead have such illogical animus toward her when it was her own husband whose conduct was reprehensible & created all of the problems in this case? Yet she “fully supports” her husband? 😂 Why does Elizabeth Proctor clearly appear to have a personal stake in the outcome of this case, or Karen Read being found guilty when she says “Karen Read is a murderer”? It’s no wonder Michael Proctor felt so comfortable to say and do such immoral and unethical things in this case. His own wife emboldens him! Have these people no shame? It is because of Michael Proctor and HIS actions that Officer #JohnOKeefe will never get proper justice, but apparently Michael and Elizabeth Proctor are the victims. QUESTION: Do you feel safer knowing Michael Proctor is a State Police Officer? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

160,321 views • 2 years ago

Let’s talk about DIRTY Yuri… because this isn’t a misunderstanding, this is how they blur responsibility and shield themselves. On the stand, DIRTY Yuri bent over backwards to tell the jury that Michael Proctor wasn’t a “leader.” Not a lead investigator. Not in charge.Just a case officer. A facilitator.A know… just the guy who Managed the investigation…Wrote search warrants…Coordinated tasks…Directed activity…. But sure — not a leader DIRTY YURI FORGOT LIASSON TO THE HOUSE DEFENDANTS! On July 23, 2024, Det. Lt. Brian Tully sits down for an Internal Affairs interview and says it plainly that Proctor was the lead investigator, Assigned through the on-call system With Dirty Yuri as his supervisor….No hesitation. No word games. But here’s the part Dirty Yuri hoped nobody noticed….Tully didn’t just learn this later. He knew about this months earlier. Tully signed a federal NDA on March 7, 2024 That NDA was tied to federal grand jury material High-ranking MSP command staff were already involved So by the time Yuri takes the stand? This was not new information. This is after Federal involvement, Internal awareness, Command-level knowledge And somehow… the story became “There was no leader.” You don’t accidentally forget your chain of command. You don’t accidentally redefine a role you supervise every single day. And you definitely don’t turn a lead investigator into a “facilitator” unless there’s a reason to blur responsibility. Because if Proctor is the lead investigator Then someone has to answer for how this investigation was handled. But if it’s just a “team effort”? Well… then nobody owns anything. Same case. Same department. Same people. Just very different stories depending on who’s asking the questions.

Let’s talk about DIRTY Yuri… because this isn’t a misunderstanding, this is how they blur responsibility and shield themselves. On the stand, DIRTY Yuri bent over backwards to tell the jury that Michael Proctor wasn’t a “leader.” Not a lead investigator. Not in charge.Just a case officer. A facilitator.A know… just the guy who Managed the investigation…Wrote search warrants…Coordinated tasks…Directed activity…. But sure — not a leader DIRTY YURI FORGOT LIASSON TO THE HOUSE DEFENDANTS! On July 23, 2024, Det. Lt. Brian Tully sits down for an Internal Affairs interview and says it plainly that Proctor was the lead investigator, Assigned through the on-call system With Dirty Yuri as his supervisor….No hesitation. No word games. But here’s the part Dirty Yuri hoped nobody noticed….Tully didn’t just learn this later. He knew about this months earlier. Tully signed a federal NDA on March 7, 2024 That NDA was tied to federal grand jury material High-ranking MSP command staff were already involved So by the time Yuri takes the stand? This was not new information. This is after Federal involvement, Internal awareness, Command-level knowledge And somehow… the story became “There was no leader.” You don’t accidentally forget your chain of command. You don’t accidentally redefine a role you supervise every single day. And you definitely don’t turn a lead investigator into a “facilitator” unless there’s a reason to blur responsibility. Because if Proctor is the lead investigator Then someone has to answer for how this investigation was handled. But if it’s just a “team effort”? Well… then nobody owns anything. Same case. Same department. Same people. Just very different stories depending on who’s asking the questions.

Dixie Normus

22,576 views • 3 months ago

Why is ADA Adam Lally so fixated on the time 8:22am, and specifically where Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik & Lead Investigator Michael Proctor were at 8:22am on January 29, 2022, and what they were doing at that time? Lally asks Bukhenik & Proctor: “Whereabouts were you at about 8:22 in the morning?” (see replies below) ——— BUKHENIK REPLIES: “At 8:22am, I would say I was still blowing the snow out of my driveway, clearing the path for my truck to leave the driveway.” ——— PROCTOR REPLIES: “Home.” LALLY ASKS: “Had you shoveled out of your driveway at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “Not yet.” LALLY ASKS: “Um, had you cleaned off your car at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “No.” ——— Lally then proceeds to ask both Yuri and Proctor about arriving at the Canton Police Department, who was there in the parking lot first, etc. ——— When ADA Lally was about to ask Bukhenik this oddly specific 8:22am whereabouts question, he initially starts out saying “And sir, when you arrived, so at approximately 8:22 in the morning or so…” almost as if he’d remembered he was supposed to get something important in about 8:22am BEFORE asking Yuri or Proctor about when they arrived at the Canton Police Department. We’ve never heard anything whatsoever about either 8:22am OR about Yuri or Proctor allegedly at home shoveling/snow blowing/removing. Additionally, having looked back at all of the known timestamp data and timeline pertaining to this case, there wasn’t anything I could find that happened at 8:22am on January 29, 2022. 8:22am is an oddly specific time. If ADA Lally simply wanted to establish that these guys had not yet shoveled out their driveways at that time, were shoveling their driveways at that time/after being notified around 6:40am but prior to going to the Canton Police Department, wouldn’t he be more broad/vague? “What were you doing around 8 or 8:30am?” for instance? Particularly given this was elicited during direct examination…in other words, asking a witness on direct what they were doing at 8:22am is semi-leading the witness with that specific timestamp. But also, isn’t it odd for these witnesses to know down to the minute that at 8:22am, that was precisely when they started shoveling out their driveways? Or whether they’d began shoveling out their driveways yet at that precise time or not? Wouldn’t the more natural response to that question be something along the lines of “I don’t remember exactly what time I began or finished shoveling, but it was the last thing I did before I left the house to go to CPD, and I know I arrived at CPD around 9am” for example? 8:22am is not a time that, based on prior testimony and evidence, holds any significance. But clearly, now it does. Why is that? Why was it of enough importance for Lally to remember he needed to establish that both of those witnesses were at their homes at that time, and not elsewhere? What’s interesting is that Lally asks Yuri what he was doing at 8:22am, and Yuri responds he was snow blowing then. But for Proctor, Lally asks where he was at 8:22am, to which Proctor simply replies “home”. Lally then follows up to ask Proctor if he’d begun shoveling or clearing off his car then, to which he says “not yet” and “no”. So clearly it was important to establish that both Yuri Bukhenik & Michael Proctor hadn’t shoveled out their driveways yet, hadn’t left their homes yet, and were nowhere else but their homes at 8:22am. Why does this matter? Also, if Yuri and Proctor were notified around 6:40am of a situation they’d have to respond to, why did they wait nearly 2 hours before beginning to shovel their driveways? I’m not saying it was an attempt at an alibi, but certainly it was significant enough for Lally to be sure to establish that at precisely that exact moment in time, Yuri & Proctor weren’t somewhere else. What say you? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Why is ADA Adam Lally so fixated on the time 8:22am, and specifically where Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik & Lead Investigator Michael Proctor were at 8:22am on January 29, 2022, and what they were doing at that time? Lally asks Bukhenik & Proctor: “Whereabouts were you at about 8:22 in the morning?” (see replies below) ——— BUKHENIK REPLIES: “At 8:22am, I would say I was still blowing the snow out of my driveway, clearing the path for my truck to leave the driveway.” ——— PROCTOR REPLIES: “Home.” LALLY ASKS: “Had you shoveled out of your driveway at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “Not yet.” LALLY ASKS: “Um, had you cleaned off your car at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “No.” ——— Lally then proceeds to ask both Yuri and Proctor about arriving at the Canton Police Department, who was there in the parking lot first, etc. ——— When ADA Lally was about to ask Bukhenik this oddly specific 8:22am whereabouts question, he initially starts out saying “And sir, when you arrived, so at approximately 8:22 in the morning or so…” almost as if he’d remembered he was supposed to get something important in about 8:22am BEFORE asking Yuri or Proctor about when they arrived at the Canton Police Department. We’ve never heard anything whatsoever about either 8:22am OR about Yuri or Proctor allegedly at home shoveling/snow blowing/removing. Additionally, having looked back at all of the known timestamp data and timeline pertaining to this case, there wasn’t anything I could find that happened at 8:22am on January 29, 2022. 8:22am is an oddly specific time. If ADA Lally simply wanted to establish that these guys had not yet shoveled out their driveways at that time, were shoveling their driveways at that time/after being notified around 6:40am but prior to going to the Canton Police Department, wouldn’t he be more broad/vague? “What were you doing around 8 or 8:30am?” for instance? Particularly given this was elicited during direct examination…in other words, asking a witness on direct what they were doing at 8:22am is semi-leading the witness with that specific timestamp. But also, isn’t it odd for these witnesses to know down to the minute that at 8:22am, that was precisely when they started shoveling out their driveways? Or whether they’d began shoveling out their driveways yet at that precise time or not? Wouldn’t the more natural response to that question be something along the lines of “I don’t remember exactly what time I began or finished shoveling, but it was the last thing I did before I left the house to go to CPD, and I know I arrived at CPD around 9am” for example? 8:22am is not a time that, based on prior testimony and evidence, holds any significance. But clearly, now it does. Why is that? Why was it of enough importance for Lally to remember he needed to establish that both of those witnesses were at their homes at that time, and not elsewhere? What’s interesting is that Lally asks Yuri what he was doing at 8:22am, and Yuri responds he was snow blowing then. But for Proctor, Lally asks where he was at 8:22am, to which Proctor simply replies “home”. Lally then follows up to ask Proctor if he’d begun shoveling or clearing off his car then, to which he says “not yet” and “no”. So clearly it was important to establish that both Yuri Bukhenik & Michael Proctor hadn’t shoveled out their driveways yet, hadn’t left their homes yet, and were nowhere else but their homes at 8:22am. Why does this matter? Also, if Yuri and Proctor were notified around 6:40am of a situation they’d have to respond to, why did they wait nearly 2 hours before beginning to shovel their driveways? I’m not saying it was an attempt at an alibi, but certainly it was significant enough for Lally to be sure to establish that at precisely that exact moment in time, Yuri & Proctor weren’t somewhere else. What say you? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

195,996 views • 2 years ago

Mark Bederow’s very first footnote in this week’s filing is putting everyone on notice that despite all the noise about Michael Proctor as of late, we still have not forgotten about Yuri Bukhenik. We have not forgotten about the Rubber Duck scandal of Canton. We have not forgotten that Bukhenik showed up at the homes of multiple women to threaten them with arrest and criminal charges for their speech on social media. Bukhenik’s abuse of power deserves the same amount of scrutiny as Proctor’s does, especially when looking at his actions through the lens of the First Amendment. Putting aside the Karen Read case entirely, Bukhenik had just as much of a part as Proctor did in the specific targeting against Aidan Kearney, who currently faces every indictment for which the Norfolk County DA’s office can attempt to justify. Despite anyone’s claims, Bukhenik and Proctor are the left and right hand of the same body. Bukhenik played an active role in a portion of the damning texts that have been uncovered from Proctor’s cell phone. He also said anything he needed to (whether true or otherwise) to protect Proctor on the witness stand. Was Bukhenik’s sworn statement that Proctor operated with “honor and integrity” purely motivated by the protection of Michael Proctor, or was it, in part, to shield himself? To repeat some of Mr. Bederow’s “free legal advice” toward anyone associated with Proctor’s abysmal conduct (from Justice Served): GET AHEAD OF IT, DO THE RIGHT THING, AND COME CLEAN. ☀️ The public should not feel that the biggest threat to their communities comes from the same people who have sworn to serve & protect them. It is well past time to find out just how deep the scandal of the Norfolk County DA’s office goes.

Mark Bederow’s very first footnote in this week’s filing is putting everyone on notice that despite all the noise about Michael Proctor as of late, we still have not forgotten about Yuri Bukhenik. We have not forgotten about the Rubber Duck scandal of Canton. We have not forgotten that Bukhenik showed up at the homes of multiple women to threaten them with arrest and criminal charges for their speech on social media. Bukhenik’s abuse of power deserves the same amount of scrutiny as Proctor’s does, especially when looking at his actions through the lens of the First Amendment. Putting aside the Karen Read case entirely, Bukhenik had just as much of a part as Proctor did in the specific targeting against Aidan Kearney, who currently faces every indictment for which the Norfolk County DA’s office can attempt to justify. Despite anyone’s claims, Bukhenik and Proctor are the left and right hand of the same body. Bukhenik played an active role in a portion of the damning texts that have been uncovered from Proctor’s cell phone. He also said anything he needed to (whether true or otherwise) to protect Proctor on the witness stand. Was Bukhenik’s sworn statement that Proctor operated with “honor and integrity” purely motivated by the protection of Michael Proctor, or was it, in part, to shield himself? To repeat some of Mr. Bederow’s “free legal advice” toward anyone associated with Proctor’s abysmal conduct (from Justice Served): GET AHEAD OF IT, DO THE RIGHT THING, AND COME CLEAN. ☀️ The public should not feel that the biggest threat to their communities comes from the same people who have sworn to serve & protect them. It is well past time to find out just how deep the scandal of the Norfolk County DA’s office goes.

Britt Happens

35,332 views • 21 days ago

So you mean to tell me, the one "gotcha" Michael Proctor used on the stand to try and persuade the jury in Karen Read Trial 1, that he "was already scheduled to be on call" so he wasn't chosen to take the John O'Keefe case, was all a LIE?? Why did Bukake call Proctor to take the case if he WASN'T EVEN ON CALL THAT MORNING?? And how did he know that Lank was already on scene? It is so obvious to anyone with a brain that this was a setup. I would be willing to bet my life that Kevin Albert was informed about what happened and asked Bukake to call Proctor and make him lead investigator so that the cover up for his brother, Brian Albert, could be set in motion. Proctor is a FUCKING FOOL and a POS for doing what he did. He was, in fact, NOT ON CALL that morning, but Buhkenik wants everyone to believe the schedule is made the month prior, "well in advance" of the day Proctor was "on call". Except THIS SCHEDULE SAYS OTHERWISE. Liars, all liars. #KarenReadWasFramed #MichaelProctor #Buhkenik #Bukake #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #NCDAO #Corruption

So you mean to tell me, the one "gotcha" Michael Proctor used on the stand to try and persuade the jury in Karen Read Trial 1, that he "was already scheduled to be on call" so he wasn't chosen to take the John O'Keefe case, was all a LIE?? Why did Bukake call Proctor to take the case if he WASN'T EVEN ON CALL THAT MORNING?? And how did he know that Lank was already on scene? It is so obvious to anyone with a brain that this was a setup. I would be willing to bet my life that Kevin Albert was informed about what happened and asked Bukake to call Proctor and make him lead investigator so that the cover up for his brother, Brian Albert, could be set in motion. Proctor is a FUCKING FOOL and a POS for doing what he did. He was, in fact, NOT ON CALL that morning, but Buhkenik wants everyone to believe the schedule is made the month prior, "well in advance" of the day Proctor was "on call". Except THIS SCHEDULE SAYS OTHERWISE. Liars, all liars. #KarenReadWasFramed #MichaelProctor #Buhkenik #Bukake #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #NCDAO #Corruption

That Girl T

26,008 views • 2 months ago

“We did not take Michael Proctor’s word for that! And thank god we didn’t! Because, WE. LEARNED. THAT. WAS. A. LIE!” — Attorney David Yannetti If Karen Read were so guilty and thus Officer #JohnOKeefe’s body would’ve had to have been in front of 34 Fairview from 12:25am to 6:03am, during which snowplows would’ve passed by, then why did Lead Investigator Michael Proctor lie and say that Fairview Road had not been plowed during that time? (Because then he would have to reveal a witness—the snowplow driver—who could and would exculpate Karen Read). Why hide witnesses if you’re prosecuting the right person? If #KarenRead were guilty of striking and leaving Officer O’Keefe for dead in front of 34 Fairview, then why would she go out of her way to find out who was snowplowing Fairview Road that night, when that person could potentially incriminate her? If Karen Read were guilty, then why would Michael Proctor want to hide and lie about all of this evidence, and these witnesses, that could incriminate her? Why hide evidence when you’re prosecuting the right person? #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

“We did not take Michael Proctor’s word for that! And thank god we didn’t! Because, WE. LEARNED. THAT. WAS. A. LIE!” — Attorney David Yannetti If Karen Read were so guilty and thus Officer #JohnOKeefe’s body would’ve had to have been in front of 34 Fairview from 12:25am to 6:03am, during which snowplows would’ve passed by, then why did Lead Investigator Michael Proctor lie and say that Fairview Road had not been plowed during that time? (Because then he would have to reveal a witness—the snowplow driver—who could and would exculpate Karen Read). Why hide witnesses if you’re prosecuting the right person? If #KarenRead were guilty of striking and leaving Officer O’Keefe for dead in front of 34 Fairview, then why would she go out of her way to find out who was snowplowing Fairview Road that night, when that person could potentially incriminate her? If Karen Read were guilty, then why would Michael Proctor want to hide and lie about all of this evidence, and these witnesses, that could incriminate her? Why hide evidence when you’re prosecuting the right person? #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

69,914 views • 2 years ago

Michael Proctor attorney Daniel Moynihan’s opening statement, only reinforced my belief that Michael Proctor should’ve never been terminated, and Michael Proctor deserves his job back. Michael Proctor is another casualty of the despicable, unethical, and potential criminal behavior of Karen Read, Alan Jackson, David Yannetti, and the blogger known as Turtleboy. 📌 why did David Yannetti, and Bill Read, have a secret meeting with US attorney Josh Levey in 2022, that resulted in a grand jury investigating this case? 📌 why were the Feds given access to all these witnesses private conversations on their private cell phones, and why were these conversations given to the defense, when nothing in these conversations were found to be criminal, or show any evidence of a cover-up, or a conspiracy. 📌 how, why, and who leaked these conversations INTENTIONALLY to a blogger who then released them to the public? Hopefully Jessica Leslie will give us those answers. 📌 these leaks of Michael Proctor‘s cell phone, not only lead to his wrongful termination, but began a witch hunt of Michael Proctor, and his entire family. A witch hunt that includes going to his home,doxxing his wife, sending threats to his family, and their private lives turned upside down. The absolute terrorization of Michael Proctor and his family is(as it is still going on) horrific and started at the direction of Karen Read herself. #justiceforproctor #Michaelproctor #givehimbackhisjob

Michael Proctor attorney Daniel Moynihan’s opening statement, only reinforced my belief that Michael Proctor should’ve never been terminated, and Michael Proctor deserves his job back. Michael Proctor is another casualty of the despicable, unethical, and potential criminal behavior of Karen Read, Alan Jackson, David Yannetti, and the blogger known as Turtleboy. 📌 why did David Yannetti, and Bill Read, have a secret meeting with US attorney Josh Levey in 2022, that resulted in a grand jury investigating this case? 📌 why were the Feds given access to all these witnesses private conversations on their private cell phones, and why were these conversations given to the defense, when nothing in these conversations were found to be criminal, or show any evidence of a cover-up, or a conspiracy. 📌 how, why, and who leaked these conversations INTENTIONALLY to a blogger who then released them to the public? Hopefully Jessica Leslie will give us those answers. 📌 these leaks of Michael Proctor‘s cell phone, not only lead to his wrongful termination, but began a witch hunt of Michael Proctor, and his entire family. A witch hunt that includes going to his home,doxxing his wife, sending threats to his family, and their private lives turned upside down. The absolute terrorization of Michael Proctor and his family is(as it is still going on) horrific and started at the direction of Karen Read herself. #justiceforproctor #Michaelproctor #givehimbackhisjob

Andie (Albert) Dufrense

21,419 views • 10 months ago

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY LEAD INVESTIGATOR INTO CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION TESTIFIES THE CRIME SCENE WAS PAVED OVER MID INVESTIGATION WITHOUT HIS PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE; LEARNED IT HAD BEEN PAVED OVER FROM THE NEWS LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “At least a couple of days, if not longer than that, before anything was removed from the scene.” DEFENSE: “You didn't have to give permission to remove the tent?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Me personally?” DEFENSE: “Right.” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “So you're not sure when it was removed?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” DEFENSE: “And were you involved in the decision to pave over the dirt that was under the tent at UVU?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “Did you know that happened?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Only because it was in the news.” DEFENSE: “All right. But you don't know when or who ordered that?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” *This is even crazier than you think because just before the trial began, the guy who paved over it said he was ordered by the Governor of Utah, who hated Charlie Kirk, & the FBI to do it immediately. He now feels bad and thinks he was unwittingly part of a cover up. I will put it in the replies of this post. You can see below where I showed the crime scene was being paved over in real time.*

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY LEAD INVESTIGATOR INTO CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION TESTIFIES THE CRIME SCENE WAS PAVED OVER MID INVESTIGATION WITHOUT HIS PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE; LEARNED IT HAD BEEN PAVED OVER FROM THE NEWS LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “At least a couple of days, if not longer than that, before anything was removed from the scene.” DEFENSE: “You didn't have to give permission to remove the tent?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Me personally?” DEFENSE: “Right.” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “So you're not sure when it was removed?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” DEFENSE: “And were you involved in the decision to pave over the dirt that was under the tent at UVU?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “Did you know that happened?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Only because it was in the news.” DEFENSE: “All right. But you don't know when or who ordered that?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” This is even crazier than you think because just before the trial began, the guy who paved over it said he was ordered by the Governor of Utah, who hated Charlie Kirk, & the FBI to do it immediately. He now feels bad and thinks he was unwittingly part of a cover up. I will put it in the replies of this post. You can see below where I showed the crime scene was being paved over in real time.

Zach Jones - Secretary of Psyops

121,780 views • 8 days ago

JUST IN: Here is the video of Karen Read leaving court after the first day of defense testimony in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen lost her motion for a directed verdict and Hank Brennan shined on cross. Karen won't be calling Michael Proctor, although she may not be able to get his text messages into evidence unless he takes the stand during the defense's case. Judge Cannone is expected to issue a ruling on Monday as to whether the defense must call Proctor to the stand in order to introduce his text messages. The defense wants to call Proctor's friends to get the text messages into evidence, but that ran into a hearsay objection from Hank Brennan (and an end-of-day motion hearing on that issue). The defense is unlikely, if they are forced to call Proctor in order to get the texts into evidence, to do so, as Read's lawyers would be forced to ask open-ended questions of Proctor on direct (and Hank Brennan could then ask Proctor leading questions on cross).

JUST IN: Here is the video of Karen Read leaving court after the first day of defense testimony in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen lost her motion for a directed verdict and Hank Brennan shined on cross. Karen won't be calling Michael Proctor, although she may not be able to get his text messages into evidence unless he takes the stand during the defense's case. Judge Cannone is expected to issue a ruling on Monday as to whether the defense must call Proctor to the stand in order to introduce his text messages. The defense wants to call Proctor's friends to get the text messages into evidence, but that ran into a hearsay objection from Hank Brennan (and an end-of-day motion hearing on that issue). The defense is unlikely, if they are forced to call Proctor in order to get the texts into evidence, to do so, as Read's lawyers would be forced to ask open-ended questions of Proctor on direct (and Hank Brennan could then ask Proctor leading questions on cross).

Grant Smith Ellis

14,237 views • 1 year ago

On the VERY DAY Karen was arrested… Julie Albert spent 12 minutes on the phone with Courtney Proctor YOU KNOW… Trooper Michael Proctor’s sister. The sister of the lead investigator who had not even interviewed the Alberts yet. Twelve minutes… on arrest day. Let that marinate. ON FEBRUARY 2, 2022 THE DAY OF KAREN’S ARRAIGNMENT Before 9 AM before Karen even walked into the courtroom Julie Albert has THREE MORE CALLS with Courtney Proctor. What could they possibly be talking about that morning? Brunch plans? Yoga classes? Or maybe… the arraignment Karen Read??? At 10:58 AM THERE IS A 27 MINUTE CALL A nearly half-hour conversation with the lead investigator’s sister after the arraignment. Gee, I wonder what they discussed, The weather? The Patriots? Or maybe… the arraignment that had literally just happened? This is not normal. This is not random. This is access. THEN 13 days after John O’Keefe died…Julie and Chris Albert were finally interviewed. AT 5:30 PM But get this, They were interviewed together, not separately. They were interviewed in their home, not at a station. They were interviewed without Colin present, So the concerned mother brings… Not Colin. Just herself. And sits next to her husband while they give a joint story. This is not how serious homicide investigations usually work. Unless the goal is not clarity… but containment. Right after their interview ends, Julie calls Trooper Proctor’s personal cellphone for 5 seconds (a “call me back” ping) then at 6:21 Proctor calls her back for 4 minutes, because apparently the lead investigator needed a quick check-in with a family whose son was at 34 Fairview minutes before a man was found dying in the snow and he had just interviewed her moments earlier! But they want you to believe they had No special access, No coaching No “off the books” conversations, No preferential treatment, No reason for concern. Just casual chit-chat with the Proctor family on, Arrest Day, Arraignment DayInterview Day Sure. Totally normal. Why is the family of people who were at 34 Fairview BEFORE the discovery of the body… on the phone with the Proctor family more than ANY other witnesses in the entire case? And why does EVERY call line up with, The arrest, The arraignment and The interviews …if all they ever did was “go to a party and go home”?

On the VERY DAY Karen was arrested… Julie Albert spent 12 minutes on the phone with Courtney Proctor YOU KNOW… Trooper Michael Proctor’s sister. The sister of the lead investigator who had not even interviewed the Alberts yet. Twelve minutes… on arrest day. Let that marinate. ON FEBRUARY 2, 2022 THE DAY OF KAREN’S ARRAIGNMENT Before 9 AM before Karen even walked into the courtroom Julie Albert has THREE MORE CALLS with Courtney Proctor. What could they possibly be talking about that morning? Brunch plans? Yoga classes? Or maybe… the arraignment Karen Read??? At 10:58 AM THERE IS A 27 MINUTE CALL A nearly half-hour conversation with the lead investigator’s sister after the arraignment. Gee, I wonder what they discussed, The weather? The Patriots? Or maybe… the arraignment that had literally just happened? This is not normal. This is not random. This is access. THEN 13 days after John O’Keefe died…Julie and Chris Albert were finally interviewed. AT 5:30 PM But get this, They were interviewed together, not separately. They were interviewed in their home, not at a station. They were interviewed without Colin present, So the concerned mother brings… Not Colin. Just herself. And sits next to her husband while they give a joint story. This is not how serious homicide investigations usually work. Unless the goal is not clarity… but containment. Right after their interview ends, Julie calls Trooper Proctor’s personal cellphone for 5 seconds (a “call me back” ping) then at 6:21 Proctor calls her back for 4 minutes, because apparently the lead investigator needed a quick check-in with a family whose son was at 34 Fairview minutes before a man was found dying in the snow and he had just interviewed her moments earlier! But they want you to believe they had No special access, No coaching No “off the books” conversations, No preferential treatment, No reason for concern. Just casual chit-chat with the Proctor family on, Arrest Day, Arraignment DayInterview Day Sure. Totally normal. Why is the family of people who were at 34 Fairview BEFORE the discovery of the body… on the phone with the Proctor family more than ANY other witnesses in the entire case? And why does EVERY call line up with, The arrest, The arraignment and The interviews …if all they ever did was “go to a party and go home”?

Dixie Normus

82,944 views • 7 months ago

If Lead Investigator Michael Proctor is depraved enough to unlawfully search #KarenRead’s cellphone for nude photographs of her on January 29, 2022, then what’s not to say he wouldn’t delete the Ring cam videos that subsequently went missing, too? FACT: Both the videos in the Ring cam system & the photographs on Karen Read’s cellphone were accessed unlawfully, without search warrants, by Michael Proctor. Proctor also hid his conflict, failed to recuse himself & then lied for the next 2 years, steadfastly defending the falsehood that he wasn’t lifelong family friends with the Albert’s & McCabe’s. We now know that was a lie. But here’s the thing: Karen immediately turned over her cellphone to Trooper Proctor. So if there’s evidence that Ring cam videos were deleted from her cellphone after Michael Proctor seized it, then it’d be pretty damning proof that he deleted the videos. —————— How did Proctor access Karen Read’s cellphone so quickly, on day 1, when he was searching it for nude photos of her? Fully cooperative & eager to help in the investigation, Karen Read promptly accessed her cellphone in front of investigators to provide them with the contact info of everyone who was present the night before with her & John. Notably, Karen Read voluntarily turned her cellphone over to investigators, without a search warrant, when she was FIRST able to speak with them. These are the actions of an honest & forthcoming witness. Not a murderer. —————— The Commonwealth tells on itself, revealing just how Proctor accessed her cellphone without a search warrant (below) in its own filings: “The troopers further asked the defendant for contact information relating to the people she had indicated were present at the bars. The defendant obliged, and prior to providing said information, the troopers observed the defendant to enter a numerical passcode into her phone to unlock it, prior to retrieving said data.” —————— If Proctor preyed upon Karen Read’s trust by secretly watching her enter her passcode to unlock her cellphone, and remembering it for later so he could go through her phone, without a search warrant, looking for nude photos & other things unrelated to the investigation, then we already know he’s perfectly willing to unlawfully access things on her cellphone for nefarious purposes. If Karen had the Ring app on her cellphone, what’s not to say Proctor didn’t access it to delete videos? Ask yourself this: If Karen Read were guilty, would she be asking for Ring data & videos that’d incriminate her? If Trooper Proctor didn’t unlawfully access the Ring app from either John or Karen’s phones to delete videos, then why would he contact & ask Ring wanting to know how long until their stored user data & videos are deleted from their servers for LE? Which is exactly what Proctor did on February 10, 2022, just days after arresting Karen Read, when he contacted them in an email from subpoenas@ring.com stating that the Ring videos had been deleted from DropBox after 90 days. If Proctor’s theory was that Karen struck & killed John with her taillight, breaking it into 45 pieces left at the scene, wouldn’t he be immediately filing a search warrant for those Ring videos to show that proof? If Proctor had unlawfully deleted those Ring videos himself though, he’d probably want to know how long until they’d be gone from Ring’s servers—evidence of HIS consciousness of guilt—so he could run out the clock so that they’re unable to be obtained, even when he does ultimately file a search warrant. Might that explain why he lied, purporting to have had a search warrant when he didn’t, knowing that the defense would’ve immediately filed an emergency motion to preserve that evidence? They ran out the clock & even lied to the defense so that there was no possible way for them to intervene before the evidence was fully destroyed & irretrievable. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

If Lead Investigator Michael Proctor is depraved enough to unlawfully search #KarenRead’s cellphone for nude photographs of her on January 29, 2022, then what’s not to say he wouldn’t delete the Ring cam videos that subsequently went missing, too? FACT: Both the videos in the Ring cam system & the photographs on Karen Read’s cellphone were accessed unlawfully, without search warrants, by Michael Proctor. Proctor also hid his conflict, failed to recuse himself & then lied for the next 2 years, steadfastly defending the falsehood that he wasn’t lifelong family friends with the Albert’s & McCabe’s. We now know that was a lie. But here’s the thing: Karen immediately turned over her cellphone to Trooper Proctor. So if there’s evidence that Ring cam videos were deleted from her cellphone after Michael Proctor seized it, then it’d be pretty damning proof that he deleted the videos. —————— How did Proctor access Karen Read’s cellphone so quickly, on day 1, when he was searching it for nude photos of her? Fully cooperative & eager to help in the investigation, Karen Read promptly accessed her cellphone in front of investigators to provide them with the contact info of everyone who was present the night before with her & John. Notably, Karen Read voluntarily turned her cellphone over to investigators, without a search warrant, when she was FIRST able to speak with them. These are the actions of an honest & forthcoming witness. Not a murderer. —————— The Commonwealth tells on itself, revealing just how Proctor accessed her cellphone without a search warrant (below) in its own filings: “The troopers further asked the defendant for contact information relating to the people she had indicated were present at the bars. The defendant obliged, and prior to providing said information, the troopers observed the defendant to enter a numerical passcode into her phone to unlock it, prior to retrieving said data.” —————— If Proctor preyed upon Karen Read’s trust by secretly watching her enter her passcode to unlock her cellphone, and remembering it for later so he could go through her phone, without a search warrant, looking for nude photos & other things unrelated to the investigation, then we already know he’s perfectly willing to unlawfully access things on her cellphone for nefarious purposes. If Karen had the Ring app on her cellphone, what’s not to say Proctor didn’t access it to delete videos? Ask yourself this: If Karen Read were guilty, would she be asking for Ring data & videos that’d incriminate her? If Trooper Proctor didn’t unlawfully access the Ring app from either John or Karen’s phones to delete videos, then why would he contact & ask Ring wanting to know how long until their stored user data & videos are deleted from their servers for LE? Which is exactly what Proctor did on February 10, 2022, just days after arresting Karen Read, when he contacted them in an email from [email protected] stating that the Ring videos had been deleted from DropBox after 90 days. If Proctor’s theory was that Karen struck & killed John with her taillight, breaking it into 45 pieces left at the scene, wouldn’t he be immediately filing a search warrant for those Ring videos to show that proof? If Proctor had unlawfully deleted those Ring videos himself though, he’d probably want to know how long until they’d be gone from Ring’s servers—evidence of HIS consciousness of guilt—so he could run out the clock so that they’re unable to be obtained, even when he does ultimately file a search warrant. Might that explain why he lied, purporting to have had a search warrant when he didn’t, knowing that the defense would’ve immediately filed an emergency motion to preserve that evidence? They ran out the clock & even lied to the defense so that there was no possible way for them to intervene before the evidence was fully destroyed & irretrievable. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

153,072 views • 2 years ago

REASONABLE DOUBT REASON # 1: #KarenReadTrial If a medical examiner couldn’t even determine #JohnOKeefe’s death was a homicide, how can anyone on the jury? Fun Fact: Over 4 months after Karen Read was first arrested, on June 10, 2022, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office upgraded her charges from manslaughter to second degree murder despite the fact that their medical examiner couldn’t even determine if it was a homicide. At that time in June 2022, the DA’s Office said that while some of Officer O’Keefe’s injuries were apparently known, the full autopsy findings were purportedly “not complete”. Hmm… 🤔 Was it that they were “not complete”? Or was it that they were complete but didn’t fit your narrative? The DA’s Office further went on to state: "While the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has accepted the case and will determine the cause and manner of death.” Despite apparently having neither a cause nor manner of death determination, apparently someone thought it was a good idea to charge Karen Read with not only manslaughter, but also second degree murder. Antithetical to the entire purpose of an investigation, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its Massachusetts State Police investigators don’t follow the evidence. Instead, they desperately twist and contort to try to make the evidence fit their narrative. Is this how we get to the truth? Is this why Michael Proctor was texting Trooper David DiCicco on April 28, 2022—in the lead up to the state grand jury to try to secure an indictment on upgraded charges—about how he wasn’t following the evidence in this case, but instead was trying to pressure the medical examiner to give him the determinations he wanted? The DA’s Office itself subsequently said “the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall” and didn’t have a cause or manner of death determination! 🤯 THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice. They have ethical obligations. Per ABA’s Standards for the Prosecution Function, Standard 3-4.6 says that: “A prosecutor should not seek an indictment unless the prosecutor reasonably believes the charges are supported by probable cause and that there will be admissible evidence sufficient to support the charges beyond reasonable doubt at trial.” This particularly applies to the Quality and Scope of Evidence Before a Grand Jury. Yet, despite having the definition of reasonable doubt, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office moved ahead with charges and upgraded charges against Karen anyway… …because, hey, according to them it could’ve been an “accidental fall”… …which would mean that Karen Read did not kill John O’Keefe, and she’s entirely innocent… …but who cares about the truth anyways? Apparently not this DA’s Office. It’s not like someone’s life isn’t hanging in the balance or anything. I guess this all explains why the Commonwealth wanted to conceal these inconvenient truths—that John’s manner of death could not be determined—evidence exculpatory to Karen Read. They sought to preclude this from the jury at trial (per their Motion In Limine to keep out John’s manner of death evidence)—because, forget about trying to get at the truth of the matter! This was never about justice. ——— VIDEO about reasonable doubt (attached) — Attorney David Howard gives one of my favorite analogy’s for reasonable doubt. Where was there not reasonable doubt in Karen Read’s case? I’m beyond eager to hear any of the jurors from her trial explain this. Anyone have any ideas? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption

REASONABLE DOUBT REASON # 1: #KarenReadTrial If a medical examiner couldn’t even determine #JohnOKeefe’s death was a homicide, how can anyone on the jury? Fun Fact: Over 4 months after Karen Read was first arrested, on June 10, 2022, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office upgraded her charges from manslaughter to second degree murder despite the fact that their medical examiner couldn’t even determine if it was a homicide. At that time in June 2022, the DA’s Office said that while some of Officer O’Keefe’s injuries were apparently known, the full autopsy findings were purportedly “not complete”. Hmm… 🤔 Was it that they were “not complete”? Or was it that they were complete but didn’t fit your narrative? The DA’s Office further went on to state: "While the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has accepted the case and will determine the cause and manner of death.” Despite apparently having neither a cause nor manner of death determination, apparently someone thought it was a good idea to charge Karen Read with not only manslaughter, but also second degree murder. Antithetical to the entire purpose of an investigation, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its Massachusetts State Police investigators don’t follow the evidence. Instead, they desperately twist and contort to try to make the evidence fit their narrative. Is this how we get to the truth? Is this why Michael Proctor was texting Trooper David DiCicco on April 28, 2022—in the lead up to the state grand jury to try to secure an indictment on upgraded charges—about how he wasn’t following the evidence in this case, but instead was trying to pressure the medical examiner to give him the determinations he wanted? The DA’s Office itself subsequently said “the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall” and didn’t have a cause or manner of death determination! 🤯 THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice. They have ethical obligations. Per ABA’s Standards for the Prosecution Function, Standard 3-4.6 says that: “A prosecutor should not seek an indictment unless the prosecutor reasonably believes the charges are supported by probable cause and that there will be admissible evidence sufficient to support the charges beyond reasonable doubt at trial.” This particularly applies to the Quality and Scope of Evidence Before a Grand Jury. Yet, despite having the definition of reasonable doubt, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office moved ahead with charges and upgraded charges against Karen anyway… …because, hey, according to them it could’ve been an “accidental fall”… …which would mean that Karen Read did not kill John O’Keefe, and she’s entirely innocent… …but who cares about the truth anyways? Apparently not this DA’s Office. It’s not like someone’s life isn’t hanging in the balance or anything. I guess this all explains why the Commonwealth wanted to conceal these inconvenient truths—that John’s manner of death could not be determined—evidence exculpatory to Karen Read. They sought to preclude this from the jury at trial (per their Motion In Limine to keep out John’s manner of death evidence)—because, forget about trying to get at the truth of the matter! This was never about justice. ——— VIDEO about reasonable doubt (attached) — Attorney David Howard gives one of my favorite analogy’s for reasonable doubt. Where was there not reasonable doubt in Karen Read’s case? I’m beyond eager to hear any of the jurors from her trial explain this. Anyone have any ideas? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

236,339 views • 2 years ago

THE MISSING CANTON LIBRARY FOOTAGE 🗣🚨 On February 7th, 2022, Louis Jutras from Canton’s IT Division emailed Trooper Dunne (Norfolk County MSP) surveillance footage from the Canton Public Library, per MSP’s request. Because of the town’s camera system setup, the footage was shared via a download link rather than direct files. Dunne then forwarded that same link to lead investigator Trooper Michael Proctor. A follow up email, obtained by @Marbury_v_Mad through a FOIA request, shows that Proctor sought help from Norfolk County Forensic Video Technician Colleen Crawford. But why would Proctor need assistance if the footage could have been easily downloaded and preserved in its raw form, with original metadata? Data that was never provided to Karen Read’s defense team. Then there’s Brian Tully, the officer chosen to testify about this footage. A curious choice since Dunne received the original link and Proctor led the investigation, both would’ve been far more relevant witnesses. As Proctor’s supervisor, Tully would likely have known about the missing footage from the Canton Library. Did he also communicate with Crawford? The original file sent by Jutras was a full one-hour segment (12:00 a.m.–1:00 a.m.), yet the version later used in evidence has missing roughly two minutes from 12:37 a.m. to 12:39 a.m. And now, this newly uncovered correspondence shows Proctor personally thanked Crawford for her help with this very footage.

THE MISSING CANTON LIBRARY FOOTAGE 🗣🚨 On February 7th, 2022, Louis Jutras from Canton’s IT Division emailed Trooper Dunne (Norfolk County MSP) surveillance footage from the Canton Public Library, per MSP’s request. Because of the town’s camera system setup, the footage was shared via a download link rather than direct files. Dunne then forwarded that same link to lead investigator Trooper Michael Proctor. A follow up email, obtained by @Marbury_v_Mad through a FOIA request, shows that Proctor sought help from Norfolk County Forensic Video Technician Colleen Crawford. But why would Proctor need assistance if the footage could have been easily downloaded and preserved in its raw form, with original metadata? Data that was never provided to Karen Read’s defense team. Then there’s Brian Tully, the officer chosen to testify about this footage. A curious choice since Dunne received the original link and Proctor led the investigation, both would’ve been far more relevant witnesses. As Proctor’s supervisor, Tully would likely have known about the missing footage from the Canton Library. Did he also communicate with Crawford? The original file sent by Jutras was a full one-hour segment (12:00 a.m.–1:00 a.m.), yet the version later used in evidence has missing roughly two minutes from 12:37 a.m. to 12:39 a.m. And now, this newly uncovered correspondence shows Proctor personally thanked Crawford for her help with this very footage.

BoozeyBeauty

92,443 views • 8 months ago

FaCt cHecK oF thE dAY! 🌟 Jumping to conclusions will always lead to a faulty landing. Claim: Kerry Roberts says she and Jennifer McCabe “willingly handed over their phones,” while Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything.” Rating: ❌ False What the trial testimony actually shows: On January 29, 2022, Massachusetts State Police Michael Proctor and Yuri Bukhenik went to Karen Read’s parents’ home after Karen told police where she was when contacted. During Trial 1, Michael Proctor testified that: 🔹️They seized Karen Read’s cell phone 🔹️They seized her Lexus SUV 🔹️A search warrant had not yet been written and would be done after the seizure Also in Trial 1, Yuri Bukhenik testified that: 🔹️After Karen’s interview concluded, police told her they would be seizing her phone and her vehicle In Trial 2, Bukhenik reconfirmed: 🔹️The phone and vehicle were seized without a warrant 🔹️The warrant was written after the fact Kerry Roberts’ statement is false because Karen Read: ✅️ Voluntarily told police her location ✅️ Allowed police into her parents’ home ✅️ Turned over her cell phone ✅️ Turned over her Lexus SUV ❌ Police did not have a search warrant ❌ She did not resist or refuse She surrendered two of the most critical pieces of evidence before any warrant existed... something defendants are not legally required to do. Bottom line is that a warrantless seizure voluntarily complied with is still voluntary cooperation. Claiming Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything” is directly contradicted by sworn trial testimony (including testimony from the very officers who seized the evidence). The record shows voluntary cooperation without a warrant and stating otherwise is not a difference of perspective, it’s factually wrong. 🤯

FaCt cHecK oF thE dAY! 🌟 Jumping to conclusions will always lead to a faulty landing. Claim: Kerry Roberts says she and Jennifer McCabe “willingly handed over their phones,” while Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything.” Rating: ❌ False What the trial testimony actually shows: On January 29, 2022, Massachusetts State Police Michael Proctor and Yuri Bukhenik went to Karen Read’s parents’ home after Karen told police where she was when contacted. During Trial 1, Michael Proctor testified that: 🔹️They seized Karen Read’s cell phone 🔹️They seized her Lexus SUV 🔹️A search warrant had not yet been written and would be done after the seizure Also in Trial 1, Yuri Bukhenik testified that: 🔹️After Karen’s interview concluded, police told her they would be seizing her phone and her vehicle In Trial 2, Bukhenik reconfirmed: 🔹️The phone and vehicle were seized without a warrant 🔹️The warrant was written after the fact Kerry Roberts’ statement is false because Karen Read: ✅️ Voluntarily told police her location ✅️ Allowed police into her parents’ home ✅️ Turned over her cell phone ✅️ Turned over her Lexus SUV ❌ Police did not have a search warrant ❌ She did not resist or refuse She surrendered two of the most critical pieces of evidence before any warrant existed... something defendants are not legally required to do. Bottom line is that a warrantless seizure voluntarily complied with is still voluntary cooperation. Claiming Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything” is directly contradicted by sworn trial testimony (including testimony from the very officers who seized the evidence). The record shows voluntary cooperation without a warrant and stating otherwise is not a difference of perspective, it’s factually wrong. 🤯

BoozeyBeauty

22,911 views • 6 months ago

During Emily D. Baker ⚖️ 💜’s reading of Karen Read’s Motion to Compel, a significant allegation emerged. According to former MSP Trooper Michael Proctor’s own notes, he knew Colin Albert was inside 34 Fairview on the night Officer John O’Keefe was found dying on Brian Albert’s lawn on January 29, 2022. Yet Colin Albert was reportedly omitted from Proctor’s report and was not formally interviewed until approximately 18 months later. Think about that. A person Proctor allegedly knew was present inside the house was left out of his report and wasn’t questioned for a year and a half. If these allegations are accurate, they raise serious questions about the thoroughness and objectivity of the investigation. Why would someone known to be inside the house not be included in the report? Why the 18-month delay? Transparency matters. Accountability matters. And the public deserves answers. #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Proctor #proctored

During Emily D. Baker ⚖️ 💜’s reading of Karen Read’s Motion to Compel, a significant allegation emerged. According to former MSP Trooper Michael Proctor’s own notes, he knew Colin Albert was inside 34 Fairview on the night Officer John O’Keefe was found dying on Brian Albert’s lawn on January 29, 2022. Yet Colin Albert was reportedly omitted from Proctor’s report and was not formally interviewed until approximately 18 months later. Think about that. A person Proctor allegedly knew was present inside the house was left out of his report and wasn’t questioned for a year and a half. If these allegations are accurate, they raise serious questions about the thoroughness and objectivity of the investigation. Why would someone known to be inside the house not be included in the report? Why the 18-month delay? Transparency matters. Accountability matters. And the public deserves answers. #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Proctor #proctored

Kelly💚🌴

42,738 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: #KarenRead defense reveals that just 5 days ago, they were provided a new report from Yuri Bukhenik dated 2/28/25 where he reveals that in May of 2024 (during trial), he was provided with a thumb drive & a CD containing video of the CPD exterior Sallyport—never turned over to the defense, despite Bukhenik’s report stating that not only was he aware of & had seen it, but he was also told to review it prior to his testimony. The Commonwealth intentionally withheld this Brady evidence from the defense at the first trial, and still didn’t even produce it until several months after the fact. So you’re telling me that the Commonwealth is so easily able to produce this Sallyport video on thumb drives and CD to its own investigators to review at trial, but they still can’t provide an answer to this day of where exactly it all came from? And Yuri Bukhenik knew of this information presumably alongside ADAs Laura McLaughlin and Adam Lally, but still chose neither to turn it over despite the law requiring them to, nor did they choose to reveal its existence at trial? Why would they hide and withhold that evidence? If Karen Read were truly guilty, wouldn’t it just help their case? #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

BREAKING: #KarenRead defense reveals that just 5 days ago, they were provided a new report from Yuri Bukhenik dated 2/28/25 where he reveals that in May of 2024 (during trial), he was provided with a thumb drive & a CD containing video of the CPD exterior Sallyport—never turned over to the defense, despite Bukhenik’s report stating that not only was he aware of & had seen it, but he was also told to review it prior to his testimony. The Commonwealth intentionally withheld this Brady evidence from the defense at the first trial, and still didn’t even produce it until several months after the fact. So you’re telling me that the Commonwealth is so easily able to produce this Sallyport video on thumb drives and CD to its own investigators to review at trial, but they still can’t provide an answer to this day of where exactly it all came from? And Yuri Bukhenik knew of this information presumably alongside ADAs Laura McLaughlin and Adam Lally, but still chose neither to turn it over despite the law requiring them to, nor did they choose to reveal its existence at trial? Why would they hide and withhold that evidence? If Karen Read were truly guilty, wouldn’t it just help their case? #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

117,233 views • 1 year ago

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

BoozeyBeauty

114,053 views • 4 months ago

NEW: The Proctorgate files continue to expand to SnapChat, and Michael Proctor's lawyer accused Karen Read's legal team of engaging in "defamation" by revealing Proctor and Sean Goode's horrifying text messages in a court filing last week, during a hearing before Judge Doolin Thursday on the Myles King docket in Norfolk Superior Court. Proctor's lawyer, during the hearing, argued that Proctor's Snapchat and text messages should not be made public. That resulted in this reporter saying, in real time; Wait, Michael Proctor had a Snapchat!?!?! Proctor's lawyer then referenced Karen's case filed last week in Bristol county (Proctorgate). Proctor's lawyer says he realizes the cat is out of the bad but implores Judge that we are talking about "Michael Proctor's privacy, who has spent years helping victims. He has never been indicted. He has never been arrested. He has never had his bail revoked. I would suggest Proctor has a legitimate privacy interest in these Snapchat messages." Proctor's lawyer wants the Norfolk D.A. to orally tell the defendants about Proctor's Snapchat messages. Proctor's lawyer then told Judge Doolin that Karen's lawsuit involving the Proctorgate files was intended to defame and embarrass Michael Proctor and, in turn, Proctor's lawyer asks Judge Doolin to keep Proctor's Snapchat messages public. Those were Proctor's own words (I said out loud). Rosemary Scapichhhio, the lawyer for Myles King, then said that Proctor has no standing in this case. Proctor is just an agent of the Commonwealth, says Scapichhhio, and it makes no sense to keep this material sealed when the Proctorgate messages are already starting to come out into the public. "I can't, for the life of me, understand how Proctor even has standing to come before the court," Scapichhhio said. Judge Doolin then said he will have a ruling "for ya' shortly." King, for his part, in currently in federal prison after he was charged by the DOJ last month for drug trafficking (a move that many suspect was designed to remove Proctor from King's cases). Read more about Proctorgate here -

NEW: The Proctorgate files continue to expand to SnapChat, and Michael Proctor's lawyer accused Karen Read's legal team of engaging in "defamation" by revealing Proctor and Sean Goode's horrifying text messages in a court filing last week, during a hearing before Judge Doolin Thursday on the Myles King docket in Norfolk Superior Court. Proctor's lawyer, during the hearing, argued that Proctor's Snapchat and text messages should not be made public. That resulted in this reporter saying, in real time; Wait, Michael Proctor had a Snapchat!?!?! Proctor's lawyer then referenced Karen's case filed last week in Bristol county (Proctorgate). Proctor's lawyer says he realizes the cat is out of the bad but implores Judge that we are talking about "Michael Proctor's privacy, who has spent years helping victims. He has never been indicted. He has never been arrested. He has never had his bail revoked. I would suggest Proctor has a legitimate privacy interest in these Snapchat messages." Proctor's lawyer wants the Norfolk D.A. to orally tell the defendants about Proctor's Snapchat messages. Proctor's lawyer then told Judge Doolin that Karen's lawsuit involving the Proctorgate files was intended to defame and embarrass Michael Proctor and, in turn, Proctor's lawyer asks Judge Doolin to keep Proctor's Snapchat messages public. Those were Proctor's own words (I said out loud). Rosemary Scapichhhio, the lawyer for Myles King, then said that Proctor has no standing in this case. Proctor is just an agent of the Commonwealth, says Scapichhhio, and it makes no sense to keep this material sealed when the Proctorgate messages are already starting to come out into the public. "I can't, for the life of me, understand how Proctor even has standing to come before the court," Scapichhhio said. Judge Doolin then said he will have a ruling "for ya' shortly." King, for his part, in currently in federal prison after he was charged by the DOJ last month for drug trafficking (a move that many suspect was designed to remove Proctor from King's cases). Read more about Proctorgate here -

Grant Smith Ellis

71,268 views • 1 month ago