Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

If DA Michael Morrissey’s Office thought calling Trooper Yuri Bukhenik over its Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor, was a wise decision, can you even imagine how bad Trooper Proctor must be then? #KarenReadTrial “I’m not Trooper Proctor” —Yuri Bukhenik In an impressively artful moment, Attorney Alan Jackson gets Yuri Bukhenik...

OliviaLambo_'s profile picture

Olivia

28,143 subscribers

121,332 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

#KarenReadTrial
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

Mrobinson profil fotoğrafı
Mrobinson2 yıl önce

Loved that part🤣 AJ is f’n w/ him🤣

Bill -_- profil fotoğrafı
Bill -_-2 yıl önce

Morrissey and his gang of thugs being mocked by Jackson is everything.

Jaime profil fotoğrafı
Jaime2 yıl önce

They called the Sullivan Sisters before the officers who actually "investigated" John's death.

M.A. Rothman profil fotoğrafı
M.A. Rothman2 yıl önce

"If you like Jack Reacher or Dirk Pitt, you must meet Levi Yoder." - Kevin J. Anderson, New York Times bestselling author. #MArothman #LeviYoder #thriller #operasinger

*~The~Truth~Is~Always~The~Strongest~Argument~* profil fotoğrafı
*~The~Truth~Is~Always~The~Strongest~Argument~*2 yıl önce

💀

Pickie profil fotoğrafı
Pickie2 yıl önce

Can't wait for Monday will Lally plunge on or Dismiss all charges? now it's got really interesting

Don Knight profil fotoğrafı
Don Knight2 yıl önce

If Proctor Trooper lies, he’s in trouble; if he tells the truth, he’s in trouble. That’s why they’re dragging their feet. They put, Don’t call me Buknik” up before him as sort of a trial run. I’m sure Proctor is studying Buknik’s testimony.

john profil fotoğrafı
john2 yıl önce

Blows my mind that people are throwing away their careers to protect these people

Annemarie Grant profil fotoğrafı
Annemarie Grant2 yıl önce

@MA_Recall @LanaDelTurtle_ @MazzaMedia @TGlarer @TheYoungJurks @DropMicrodots @TedDanielnews DONT IGNORE THESE CASES! ALL SAME THE INVESTIGATORS! These are the PATTERNS & PRACTICES of the #NorfolkDA Morrissey’s office! #JustonRoot #JohnOKeefe #SandraBirchmore #Bukhenik

jukeboxgrad profil fotoğrafı
jukeboxgrad2 yıl önce

YB's a liar. On Wed, he was the driver. On Thu, he said: "I think that's the tow-truck driver. He would have the only access to the vehicle, we did not touch the vehicle." AJ pointed out the contradiction and YB denied it.

Benzer Videolar

WOW. JUST WOW. Michael Proctor is confronted with his text messages from August of 2022 where a photo of #KarenRead’s Attorney David Yannetti was sent & he replies “I truly hate him”. In a jaw dropping moment Attorney Alan Jackson asks Proctor: “How do you feel about him (Attorney Yannetti) now? He’s sitting right there” Shockingly, Proctor responds: “I still don’t care for him now!” ——————— Wow. What a classy, unbiased professional. Look at the absolute “shock and horrah” on everyone’s faces upon hearing such a response! What a total piece of human garbage. If this wasn’t a coverup, then why did Michael Proctor clearly have such vitriol and emotional disdain for some Attorney of a defendant he didn’t know, in an investigation with other people he supposedly didn’t know? Oh wait, we now know that was a lie and this “unbiased” Lead Investigator was anything but! Question: Why would a Lead Investigator on a homicide have such disdain for the legal counsel a defendant hires, if he doesn’t have a personal stake in the outcome like he would if he were covering up a murder for his friends and framing an innocent woman so that THEY, his “second family” don’t go down? Did he have such disdain for Attorney David Yannetti because he is one of the top criminal defense attorneys in the country, and Proctor became scared knowing his sloppy coverup was more likely to become exposed with the better the Attorneys Karen Read retained? And that angered him because he just wanted her to keel over and submit—be their scapegoat goddamn*t! Well Michael Proctor, welcome to hell! Because Attorneys Alan Jackson, David Yannetti and Elizabeth Little—WE AIN’T GOT NO QUIT! #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption #MichaelProctor #MassachusettsStatePolice
0:31

WOW. JUST WOW. Michael Proctor is confronted with his text messages from August of 2022 where a photo of #KarenRead’s Attorney David Yannetti was sent & he replies “I truly hate him”. In a jaw dropping moment Attorney Alan Jackson asks Proctor: “How do you feel about him (Attorney Yannetti) now? He’s sitting right there” Shockingly, Proctor responds: “I still don’t care for him now!” ——————— Wow. What a classy, unbiased professional. Look at the absolute “shock and horrah” on everyone’s faces upon hearing such a response! What a total piece of human garbage. If this wasn’t a coverup, then why did Michael Proctor clearly have such vitriol and emotional disdain for some Attorney of a defendant he didn’t know, in an investigation with other people he supposedly didn’t know? Oh wait, we now know that was a lie and this “unbiased” Lead Investigator was anything but! Question: Why would a Lead Investigator on a homicide have such disdain for the legal counsel a defendant hires, if he doesn’t have a personal stake in the outcome like he would if he were covering up a murder for his friends and framing an innocent woman so that THEY, his “second family” don’t go down? Did he have such disdain for Attorney David Yannetti because he is one of the top criminal defense attorneys in the country, and Proctor became scared knowing his sloppy coverup was more likely to become exposed with the better the Attorneys Karen Read retained? And that angered him because he just wanted her to keel over and submit—be their scapegoat goddamn*t! Well Michael Proctor, welcome to hell! Because Attorneys Alan Jackson, David Yannetti and Elizabeth Little—WE AIN’T GOT NO QUIT! #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption #MichaelProctor #MassachusettsStatePolice

Olivia

479,831 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Why is Michael Proctor still employed by the Massachusetts State Police? Why is his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, commenting on an open investigation he’s involved in and heavily conflicted on? Why does Elizabeth Proctor—someone who doesn’t, nor did she ever, know #KarenRead have such illogical animus toward her when it was her own husband whose conduct was reprehensible & created all of the problems in this case? Yet she “fully supports” her husband? 😂 Why does Elizabeth Proctor clearly appear to have a personal stake in the outcome of this case, or Karen Read being found guilty when she says “Karen Read is a murderer”? It’s no wonder Michael Proctor felt so comfortable to say and do such immoral and unethical things in this case. His own wife emboldens him! Have these people no shame? It is because of Michael Proctor and HIS actions that Officer #JohnOKeefe will never get proper justice, but apparently Michael and Elizabeth Proctor are the victims. QUESTION: Do you feel safer knowing Michael Proctor is a State Police Officer? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
0:55

Why is Michael Proctor still employed by the Massachusetts State Police? Why is his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, commenting on an open investigation he’s involved in and heavily conflicted on? Why does Elizabeth Proctor—someone who doesn’t, nor did she ever, know #KarenRead have such illogical animus toward her when it was her own husband whose conduct was reprehensible & created all of the problems in this case? Yet she “fully supports” her husband? 😂 Why does Elizabeth Proctor clearly appear to have a personal stake in the outcome of this case, or Karen Read being found guilty when she says “Karen Read is a murderer”? It’s no wonder Michael Proctor felt so comfortable to say and do such immoral and unethical things in this case. His own wife emboldens him! Have these people no shame? It is because of Michael Proctor and HIS actions that Officer #JohnOKeefe will never get proper justice, but apparently Michael and Elizabeth Proctor are the victims. QUESTION: Do you feel safer knowing Michael Proctor is a State Police Officer? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

160,413 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Catching up on testimony & have a bunch of backlogged posts coming ASAP! “#KarenRead’s not being framed! That’s just a fanciful conspiracy!” ADA Adam Lally & DA Michael Morrissey’s Office committed fraud on the Court to admit false evidence—that appears to be doctored—through its witness, Yuri Bukhenik, arguably via suborning perjury. That evidence appears to be doctored specifically to remove from view the part of the vehicle at issue—the right taillight, and what the conflicted Lead Investigator at issue—Michael Proctor—was doing around it. It’s also purported to show Karen Read’s right taillight arriving with damage, which is interesting given we now know it was actually the undamaged left taillight in view. This then begs the question of how they got an undamaged taillight to look damaged in their already verifiably doctored footage. 🤔 This was a desperate attempt to assuage the concerns about what nefarious activity the conflicted Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor, was engaging in as it relates to Read’s right taillight—both of which were conveniently kept out of view in this video. This makes it all the more confounding how Yuri Bukhenik could testify to what Trooper Proctor was doing given you can’t see in the video, and Yuri doesn’t have any first hand knowledge as he wasn’t there next to Proctor the entire time. If anyone had any doubt in their mind about the veracity of #KarenRead’s well-substantiated third-party culprit defense theory, ADA Adam Lally & DA Michael Morrissey’s Office swiftly removed that today when they exposed themselves as frauds who are willing to purposely deceive a jury, the Court, and the public in order to achieve a desired outcome. If this were an honest prosecution, and the DA’s Office were prosecuting the right person(s), then why would they offer false evidence that appears to be doctored, and admit it through suborning perjury from a Police Officer witness—suggesting, at the very least, collusion between State Police Investigators and the Norfolk County DA’s Office? ADA Lally & DA Morrissey’s Office have definitively removed any & all doubt that they are corrupt and complicit in covering up a murder & aiding the criminals to frame Karen Read. Yuri Bukhenik, a Massachusetts State Police Investigator also seemingly confirmed he is corrupt & complicit when he misrepresented this video evidence through testimony in a concerted effort with ADA Lally to deceive the jury in the same way, by misleading them to believe they were viewing the taillight at issue on Karen Read’s car. They produced evidence—surveillance video of the CPD Sallyport garage—that was doctored, and then they knowingly attempted to perpetuate this fraud upon the Court, deliberately trying to mislead the Court & the jury to believe they’d presented an honest & true version of that footage. Specifically, this fraud on Judge Cannone’s Court was even further perpetuated arguably through suborning perjury through the witness, Trooper Yuri Bukhenik, who went as far as giving the detail of what side the driveway entering into the Sallyport (from outside the garage door) was on—information that would also be a lie when looking at a “mirror-imaged” video—in an attempt to mislead the jury into believing that the video was an accurate reflection of the garage and the orientation of everything contained therein. This is despicable. Anyone following & watching the trial at home quickly noticed when this video was first shown that something was off—it looked like it was a “mirror image” of the original given the orientation of things, and lettering on the walls being backwards, for instance. The jury was probably perplexed by this, particularly after ADA Lally admitted it as a true and accurate version of the evidence—which it’s clearly not, thus explaining certain oddities like how the driver appeared to exit the vehicle from the passenger side. This is outrageous! We are outraged! #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead
0:39

Catching up on testimony & have a bunch of backlogged posts coming ASAP! “#KarenRead’s not being framed! That’s just a fanciful conspiracy!” ADA Adam Lally & DA Michael Morrissey’s Office committed fraud on the Court to admit false evidence—that appears to be doctored—through its witness, Yuri Bukhenik, arguably via suborning perjury. That evidence appears to be doctored specifically to remove from view the part of the vehicle at issue—the right taillight, and what the conflicted Lead Investigator at issue—Michael Proctor—was doing around it. It’s also purported to show Karen Read’s right taillight arriving with damage, which is interesting given we now know it was actually the undamaged left taillight in view. This then begs the question of how they got an undamaged taillight to look damaged in their already verifiably doctored footage. 🤔 This was a desperate attempt to assuage the concerns about what nefarious activity the conflicted Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor, was engaging in as it relates to Read’s right taillight—both of which were conveniently kept out of view in this video. This makes it all the more confounding how Yuri Bukhenik could testify to what Trooper Proctor was doing given you can’t see in the video, and Yuri doesn’t have any first hand knowledge as he wasn’t there next to Proctor the entire time. If anyone had any doubt in their mind about the veracity of #KarenRead’s well-substantiated third-party culprit defense theory, ADA Adam Lally & DA Michael Morrissey’s Office swiftly removed that today when they exposed themselves as frauds who are willing to purposely deceive a jury, the Court, and the public in order to achieve a desired outcome. If this were an honest prosecution, and the DA’s Office were prosecuting the right person(s), then why would they offer false evidence that appears to be doctored, and admit it through suborning perjury from a Police Officer witness—suggesting, at the very least, collusion between State Police Investigators and the Norfolk County DA’s Office? ADA Lally & DA Morrissey’s Office have definitively removed any & all doubt that they are corrupt and complicit in covering up a murder & aiding the criminals to frame Karen Read. Yuri Bukhenik, a Massachusetts State Police Investigator also seemingly confirmed he is corrupt & complicit when he misrepresented this video evidence through testimony in a concerted effort with ADA Lally to deceive the jury in the same way, by misleading them to believe they were viewing the taillight at issue on Karen Read’s car. They produced evidence—surveillance video of the CPD Sallyport garage—that was doctored, and then they knowingly attempted to perpetuate this fraud upon the Court, deliberately trying to mislead the Court & the jury to believe they’d presented an honest & true version of that footage. Specifically, this fraud on Judge Cannone’s Court was even further perpetuated arguably through suborning perjury through the witness, Trooper Yuri Bukhenik, who went as far as giving the detail of what side the driveway entering into the Sallyport (from outside the garage door) was on—information that would also be a lie when looking at a “mirror-imaged” video—in an attempt to mislead the jury into believing that the video was an accurate reflection of the garage and the orientation of everything contained therein. This is despicable. Anyone following & watching the trial at home quickly noticed when this video was first shown that something was off—it looked like it was a “mirror image” of the original given the orientation of things, and lettering on the walls being backwards, for instance. The jury was probably perplexed by this, particularly after ADA Lally admitted it as a true and accurate version of the evidence—which it’s clearly not, thus explaining certain oddities like how the driver appeared to exit the vehicle from the passenger side. This is outrageous! We are outraged! #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

111,603 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Let’s talk about DIRTY Yuri… because this isn’t a misunderstanding, this is how they blur responsibility and shield themselves. On the stand, DIRTY Yuri bent over backwards to tell the jury that Michael Proctor wasn’t a “leader.” Not a lead investigator. Not in charge.Just a case officer. A facilitator.A know… just the guy who Managed the investigation…Wrote search warrants…Coordinated tasks…Directed activity…. But sure — not a leader DIRTY YURI FORGOT LIASSON TO THE HOUSE DEFENDANTS! On July 23, 2024, Det. Lt. Brian Tully sits down for an Internal Affairs interview and says it plainly that Proctor was the lead investigator, Assigned through the on-call system With Dirty Yuri as his supervisor….No hesitation. No word games. But here’s the part Dirty Yuri hoped nobody noticed….Tully didn’t just learn this later. He knew about this months earlier. Tully signed a federal NDA on March 7, 2024 That NDA was tied to federal grand jury material High-ranking MSP command staff were already involved So by the time Yuri takes the stand? This was not new information. This is after Federal involvement, Internal awareness, Command-level knowledge And somehow… the story became “There was no leader.” You don’t accidentally forget your chain of command. You don’t accidentally redefine a role you supervise every single day. And you definitely don’t turn a lead investigator into a “facilitator” unless there’s a reason to blur responsibility. Because if Proctor is the lead investigator Then someone has to answer for how this investigation was handled. But if it’s just a “team effort”? Well… then nobody owns anything. Same case. Same department. Same people. Just very different stories depending on who’s asking the questions.
1:41

Let’s talk about DIRTY Yuri… because this isn’t a misunderstanding, this is how they blur responsibility and shield themselves. On the stand, DIRTY Yuri bent over backwards to tell the jury that Michael Proctor wasn’t a “leader.” Not a lead investigator. Not in charge.Just a case officer. A facilitator.A know… just the guy who Managed the investigation…Wrote search warrants…Coordinated tasks…Directed activity…. But sure — not a leader DIRTY YURI FORGOT LIASSON TO THE HOUSE DEFENDANTS! On July 23, 2024, Det. Lt. Brian Tully sits down for an Internal Affairs interview and says it plainly that Proctor was the lead investigator, Assigned through the on-call system With Dirty Yuri as his supervisor….No hesitation. No word games. But here’s the part Dirty Yuri hoped nobody noticed….Tully didn’t just learn this later. He knew about this months earlier. Tully signed a federal NDA on March 7, 2024 That NDA was tied to federal grand jury material High-ranking MSP command staff were already involved So by the time Yuri takes the stand? This was not new information. This is after Federal involvement, Internal awareness, Command-level knowledge And somehow… the story became “There was no leader.” You don’t accidentally forget your chain of command. You don’t accidentally redefine a role you supervise every single day. And you definitely don’t turn a lead investigator into a “facilitator” unless there’s a reason to blur responsibility. Because if Proctor is the lead investigator Then someone has to answer for how this investigation was handled. But if it’s just a “team effort”? Well… then nobody owns anything. Same case. Same department. Same people. Just very different stories depending on who’s asking the questions.

Dixie Normus

22,576 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Why is ADA Adam Lally so fixated on the time 8:22am, and specifically where Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik & Lead Investigator Michael Proctor were at 8:22am on January 29, 2022, and what they were doing at that time? Lally asks Bukhenik & Proctor: “Whereabouts were you at about 8:22 in the morning?” (see replies below) ——— BUKHENIK REPLIES: “At 8:22am, I would say I was still blowing the snow out of my driveway, clearing the path for my truck to leave the driveway.” ——— PROCTOR REPLIES: “Home.” LALLY ASKS: “Had you shoveled out of your driveway at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “Not yet.” LALLY ASKS: “Um, had you cleaned off your car at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “No.” ——— Lally then proceeds to ask both Yuri and Proctor about arriving at the Canton Police Department, who was there in the parking lot first, etc. ——— When ADA Lally was about to ask Bukhenik this oddly specific 8:22am whereabouts question, he initially starts out saying “And sir, when you arrived, so at approximately 8:22 in the morning or so…” almost as if he’d remembered he was supposed to get something important in about 8:22am BEFORE asking Yuri or Proctor about when they arrived at the Canton Police Department. We’ve never heard anything whatsoever about either 8:22am OR about Yuri or Proctor allegedly at home shoveling/snow blowing/removing. Additionally, having looked back at all of the known timestamp data and timeline pertaining to this case, there wasn’t anything I could find that happened at 8:22am on January 29, 2022. 8:22am is an oddly specific time. If ADA Lally simply wanted to establish that these guys had not yet shoveled out their driveways at that time, were shoveling their driveways at that time/after being notified around 6:40am but prior to going to the Canton Police Department, wouldn’t he be more broad/vague? “What were you doing around 8 or 8:30am?” for instance? Particularly given this was elicited during direct examination…in other words, asking a witness on direct what they were doing at 8:22am is semi-leading the witness with that specific timestamp. But also, isn’t it odd for these witnesses to know down to the minute that at 8:22am, that was precisely when they started shoveling out their driveways? Or whether they’d began shoveling out their driveways yet at that precise time or not? Wouldn’t the more natural response to that question be something along the lines of “I don’t remember exactly what time I began or finished shoveling, but it was the last thing I did before I left the house to go to CPD, and I know I arrived at CPD around 9am” for example? 8:22am is not a time that, based on prior testimony and evidence, holds any significance. But clearly, now it does. Why is that? Why was it of enough importance for Lally to remember he needed to establish that both of those witnesses were at their homes at that time, and not elsewhere? What’s interesting is that Lally asks Yuri what he was doing at 8:22am, and Yuri responds he was snow blowing then. But for Proctor, Lally asks where he was at 8:22am, to which Proctor simply replies “home”. Lally then follows up to ask Proctor if he’d begun shoveling or clearing off his car then, to which he says “not yet” and “no”. So clearly it was important to establish that both Yuri Bukhenik & Michael Proctor hadn’t shoveled out their driveways yet, hadn’t left their homes yet, and were nowhere else but their homes at 8:22am. Why does this matter? Also, if Yuri and Proctor were notified around 6:40am of a situation they’d have to respond to, why did they wait nearly 2 hours before beginning to shovel their driveways? I’m not saying it was an attempt at an alibi, but certainly it was significant enough for Lally to be sure to establish that at precisely that exact moment in time, Yuri & Proctor weren’t somewhere else. What say you? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
0:33

Why is ADA Adam Lally so fixated on the time 8:22am, and specifically where Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik & Lead Investigator Michael Proctor were at 8:22am on January 29, 2022, and what they were doing at that time? Lally asks Bukhenik & Proctor: “Whereabouts were you at about 8:22 in the morning?” (see replies below) ——— BUKHENIK REPLIES: “At 8:22am, I would say I was still blowing the snow out of my driveway, clearing the path for my truck to leave the driveway.” ——— PROCTOR REPLIES: “Home.” LALLY ASKS: “Had you shoveled out of your driveway at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “Not yet.” LALLY ASKS: “Um, had you cleaned off your car at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “No.” ——— Lally then proceeds to ask both Yuri and Proctor about arriving at the Canton Police Department, who was there in the parking lot first, etc. ——— When ADA Lally was about to ask Bukhenik this oddly specific 8:22am whereabouts question, he initially starts out saying “And sir, when you arrived, so at approximately 8:22 in the morning or so…” almost as if he’d remembered he was supposed to get something important in about 8:22am BEFORE asking Yuri or Proctor about when they arrived at the Canton Police Department. We’ve never heard anything whatsoever about either 8:22am OR about Yuri or Proctor allegedly at home shoveling/snow blowing/removing. Additionally, having looked back at all of the known timestamp data and timeline pertaining to this case, there wasn’t anything I could find that happened at 8:22am on January 29, 2022. 8:22am is an oddly specific time. If ADA Lally simply wanted to establish that these guys had not yet shoveled out their driveways at that time, were shoveling their driveways at that time/after being notified around 6:40am but prior to going to the Canton Police Department, wouldn’t he be more broad/vague? “What were you doing around 8 or 8:30am?” for instance? Particularly given this was elicited during direct examination…in other words, asking a witness on direct what they were doing at 8:22am is semi-leading the witness with that specific timestamp. But also, isn’t it odd for these witnesses to know down to the minute that at 8:22am, that was precisely when they started shoveling out their driveways? Or whether they’d began shoveling out their driveways yet at that precise time or not? Wouldn’t the more natural response to that question be something along the lines of “I don’t remember exactly what time I began or finished shoveling, but it was the last thing I did before I left the house to go to CPD, and I know I arrived at CPD around 9am” for example? 8:22am is not a time that, based on prior testimony and evidence, holds any significance. But clearly, now it does. Why is that? Why was it of enough importance for Lally to remember he needed to establish that both of those witnesses were at their homes at that time, and not elsewhere? What’s interesting is that Lally asks Yuri what he was doing at 8:22am, and Yuri responds he was snow blowing then. But for Proctor, Lally asks where he was at 8:22am, to which Proctor simply replies “home”. Lally then follows up to ask Proctor if he’d begun shoveling or clearing off his car then, to which he says “not yet” and “no”. So clearly it was important to establish that both Yuri Bukhenik & Michael Proctor hadn’t shoveled out their driveways yet, hadn’t left their homes yet, and were nowhere else but their homes at 8:22am. Why does this matter? Also, if Yuri and Proctor were notified around 6:40am of a situation they’d have to respond to, why did they wait nearly 2 hours before beginning to shovel their driveways? I’m not saying it was an attempt at an alibi, but certainly it was significant enough for Lally to be sure to establish that at precisely that exact moment in time, Yuri & Proctor weren’t somewhere else. What say you? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

195,996 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Mark Bederow’s very first footnote in this week’s filing is putting everyone on notice that despite all the noise about Michael Proctor as of late, we still have not forgotten about Yuri Bukhenik. We have not forgotten about the Rubber Duck scandal of Canton. We have not forgotten that Bukhenik showed up at the homes of multiple women to threaten them with arrest and criminal charges for their speech on social media. Bukhenik’s abuse of power deserves the same amount of scrutiny as Proctor’s does, especially when looking at his actions through the lens of the First Amendment. Putting aside the Karen Read case entirely, Bukhenik had just as much of a part as Proctor did in the specific targeting against Aidan Kearney, who currently faces every indictment for which the Norfolk County DA’s office can attempt to justify. Despite anyone’s claims, Bukhenik and Proctor are the left and right hand of the same body. Bukhenik played an active role in a portion of the damning texts that have been uncovered from Proctor’s cell phone. He also said anything he needed to (whether true or otherwise) to protect Proctor on the witness stand. Was Bukhenik’s sworn statement that Proctor operated with “honor and integrity” purely motivated by the protection of Michael Proctor, or was it, in part, to shield himself? To repeat some of Mr. Bederow’s “free legal advice” toward anyone associated with Proctor’s abysmal conduct (from Justice Served): GET AHEAD OF IT, DO THE RIGHT THING, AND COME CLEAN. ☀️ The public should not feel that the biggest threat to their communities comes from the same people who have sworn to serve & protect them. It is well past time to find out just how deep the scandal of the Norfolk County DA’s office goes.
1:37

Mark Bederow’s very first footnote in this week’s filing is putting everyone on notice that despite all the noise about Michael Proctor as of late, we still have not forgotten about Yuri Bukhenik. We have not forgotten about the Rubber Duck scandal of Canton. We have not forgotten that Bukhenik showed up at the homes of multiple women to threaten them with arrest and criminal charges for their speech on social media. Bukhenik’s abuse of power deserves the same amount of scrutiny as Proctor’s does, especially when looking at his actions through the lens of the First Amendment. Putting aside the Karen Read case entirely, Bukhenik had just as much of a part as Proctor did in the specific targeting against Aidan Kearney, who currently faces every indictment for which the Norfolk County DA’s office can attempt to justify. Despite anyone’s claims, Bukhenik and Proctor are the left and right hand of the same body. Bukhenik played an active role in a portion of the damning texts that have been uncovered from Proctor’s cell phone. He also said anything he needed to (whether true or otherwise) to protect Proctor on the witness stand. Was Bukhenik’s sworn statement that Proctor operated with “honor and integrity” purely motivated by the protection of Michael Proctor, or was it, in part, to shield himself? To repeat some of Mr. Bederow’s “free legal advice” toward anyone associated with Proctor’s abysmal conduct (from Justice Served): GET AHEAD OF IT, DO THE RIGHT THING, AND COME CLEAN. ☀️ The public should not feel that the biggest threat to their communities comes from the same people who have sworn to serve & protect them. It is well past time to find out just how deep the scandal of the Norfolk County DA’s office goes.

Britt Happens

35,332 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

So you mean to tell me, the one "gotcha" Michael Proctor used on the stand to try and persuade the jury in Karen Read Trial 1, that he "was already scheduled to be on call" so he wasn't chosen to take the John O'Keefe case, was all a LIE?? Why did Bukake call Proctor to take the case if he WASN'T EVEN ON CALL THAT MORNING?? And how did he know that Lank was already on scene? It is so obvious to anyone with a brain that this was a setup. I would be willing to bet my life that Kevin Albert was informed about what happened and asked Bukake to call Proctor and make him lead investigator so that the cover up for his brother, Brian Albert, could be set in motion. Proctor is a FUCKING FOOL and a POS for doing what he did. He was, in fact, NOT ON CALL that morning, but Buhkenik wants everyone to believe the schedule is made the month prior, "well in advance" of the day Proctor was "on call". Except THIS SCHEDULE SAYS OTHERWISE. Liars, all liars. #KarenReadWasFramed #MichaelProctor #Buhkenik #Bukake #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #NCDAO #Corruption
2:50

So you mean to tell me, the one "gotcha" Michael Proctor used on the stand to try and persuade the jury in Karen Read Trial 1, that he "was already scheduled to be on call" so he wasn't chosen to take the John O'Keefe case, was all a LIE?? Why did Bukake call Proctor to take the case if he WASN'T EVEN ON CALL THAT MORNING?? And how did he know that Lank was already on scene? It is so obvious to anyone with a brain that this was a setup. I would be willing to bet my life that Kevin Albert was informed about what happened and asked Bukake to call Proctor and make him lead investigator so that the cover up for his brother, Brian Albert, could be set in motion. Proctor is a FUCKING FOOL and a POS for doing what he did. He was, in fact, NOT ON CALL that morning, but Buhkenik wants everyone to believe the schedule is made the month prior, "well in advance" of the day Proctor was "on call". Except THIS SCHEDULE SAYS OTHERWISE. Liars, all liars. #KarenReadWasFramed #MichaelProctor #Buhkenik #Bukake #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #NCDAO #Corruption

That Girl T

26,008 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

“We did not take Michael Proctor’s word for that! And thank god we didn’t! Because, WE. LEARNED. THAT. WAS. A. LIE!” — Attorney David Yannetti If Karen Read were so guilty and thus Officer #JohnOKeefe’s body would’ve had to have been in front of 34 Fairview from 12:25am to 6:03am, during which snowplows would’ve passed by, then why did Lead Investigator Michael Proctor lie and say that Fairview Road had not been plowed during that time? (Because then he would have to reveal a witness—the snowplow driver—who could and would exculpate Karen Read). Why hide witnesses if you’re prosecuting the right person? If #KarenRead were guilty of striking and leaving Officer O’Keefe for dead in front of 34 Fairview, then why would she go out of her way to find out who was snowplowing Fairview Road that night, when that person could potentially incriminate her? If Karen Read were guilty, then why would Michael Proctor want to hide and lie about all of this evidence, and these witnesses, that could incriminate her? Why hide evidence when you’re prosecuting the right person? #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
1:44

“We did not take Michael Proctor’s word for that! And thank god we didn’t! Because, WE. LEARNED. THAT. WAS. A. LIE!” — Attorney David Yannetti If Karen Read were so guilty and thus Officer #JohnOKeefe’s body would’ve had to have been in front of 34 Fairview from 12:25am to 6:03am, during which snowplows would’ve passed by, then why did Lead Investigator Michael Proctor lie and say that Fairview Road had not been plowed during that time? (Because then he would have to reveal a witness—the snowplow driver—who could and would exculpate Karen Read). Why hide witnesses if you’re prosecuting the right person? If #KarenRead were guilty of striking and leaving Officer O’Keefe for dead in front of 34 Fairview, then why would she go out of her way to find out who was snowplowing Fairview Road that night, when that person could potentially incriminate her? If Karen Read were guilty, then why would Michael Proctor want to hide and lie about all of this evidence, and these witnesses, that could incriminate her? Why hide evidence when you’re prosecuting the right person? #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

69,914 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY LEAD INVESTIGATOR INTO CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION TESTIFIES THE CRIME SCENE WAS PAVED OVER MID INVESTIGATION WITHOUT HIS PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE; LEARNED IT HAD BEEN PAVED OVER FROM THE NEWS LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “At least a couple of days, if not longer than that, before anything was removed from the scene.” DEFENSE: “You didn't have to give permission to remove the tent?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Me personally?” DEFENSE: “Right.” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “So you're not sure when it was removed?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” DEFENSE: “And were you involved in the decision to pave over the dirt that was under the tent at UVU?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “Did you know that happened?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Only because it was in the news.” DEFENSE: “All right. But you don't know when or who ordered that?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” *This is even crazier than you think because just before the trial began, the guy who paved over it said he was ordered by the Governor of Utah, who hated Charlie Kirk, & the FBI to do it immediately. He now feels bad and thinks he was unwittingly part of a cover up. I will put it in the replies of this post. You can see below where I showed the crime scene was being paved over in real time.*
0:28

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY LEAD INVESTIGATOR INTO CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION TESTIFIES THE CRIME SCENE WAS PAVED OVER MID INVESTIGATION WITHOUT HIS PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE; LEARNED IT HAD BEEN PAVED OVER FROM THE NEWS LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “At least a couple of days, if not longer than that, before anything was removed from the scene.” DEFENSE: “You didn't have to give permission to remove the tent?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Me personally?” DEFENSE: “Right.” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “So you're not sure when it was removed?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” DEFENSE: “And were you involved in the decision to pave over the dirt that was under the tent at UVU?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “Did you know that happened?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Only because it was in the news.” DEFENSE: “All right. But you don't know when or who ordered that?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” *This is even crazier than you think because just before the trial began, the guy who paved over it said he was ordered by the Governor of Utah, who hated Charlie Kirk, & the FBI to do it immediately. He now feels bad and thinks he was unwittingly part of a cover up. I will put it in the replies of this post. You can see below where I showed the crime scene was being paved over in real time.*

Zach Jones - Secretary of Psyops

122,262 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

On the VERY DAY Karen was arrested… Julie Albert spent 12 minutes on the phone with Courtney Proctor YOU KNOW… Trooper Michael Proctor’s sister. The sister of the lead investigator who had not even interviewed the Alberts yet. Twelve minutes… on arrest day. Let that marinate. ON FEBRUARY 2, 2022 THE DAY OF KAREN’S ARRAIGNMENT Before 9 AM before Karen even walked into the courtroom Julie Albert has THREE MORE CALLS with Courtney Proctor. What could they possibly be talking about that morning? Brunch plans? Yoga classes? Or maybe… the arraignment Karen Read??? At 10:58 AM THERE IS A 27 MINUTE CALL A nearly half-hour conversation with the lead investigator’s sister after the arraignment. Gee, I wonder what they discussed, The weather? The Patriots? Or maybe… the arraignment that had literally just happened? This is not normal. This is not random. This is access. THEN 13 days after John O’Keefe died…Julie and Chris Albert were finally interviewed. AT 5:30 PM But get this, They were interviewed together, not separately. They were interviewed in their home, not at a station. They were interviewed without Colin present, So the concerned mother brings… Not Colin. Just herself. And sits next to her husband while they give a joint story. This is not how serious homicide investigations usually work. Unless the goal is not clarity… but containment. Right after their interview ends, Julie calls Trooper Proctor’s personal cellphone for 5 seconds (a “call me back” ping) then at 6:21 Proctor calls her back for 4 minutes, because apparently the lead investigator needed a quick check-in with a family whose son was at 34 Fairview minutes before a man was found dying in the snow and he had just interviewed her moments earlier! But they want you to believe they had No special access, No coaching No “off the books” conversations, No preferential treatment, No reason for concern. Just casual chit-chat with the Proctor family on, Arrest Day, Arraignment DayInterview Day Sure. Totally normal. Why is the family of people who were at 34 Fairview BEFORE the discovery of the body… on the phone with the Proctor family more than ANY other witnesses in the entire case? And why does EVERY call line up with, The arrest, The arraignment and The interviews …if all they ever did was “go to a party and go home”?
2:50

On the VERY DAY Karen was arrested… Julie Albert spent 12 minutes on the phone with Courtney Proctor YOU KNOW… Trooper Michael Proctor’s sister. The sister of the lead investigator who had not even interviewed the Alberts yet. Twelve minutes… on arrest day. Let that marinate. ON FEBRUARY 2, 2022 THE DAY OF KAREN’S ARRAIGNMENT Before 9 AM before Karen even walked into the courtroom Julie Albert has THREE MORE CALLS with Courtney Proctor. What could they possibly be talking about that morning? Brunch plans? Yoga classes? Or maybe… the arraignment Karen Read??? At 10:58 AM THERE IS A 27 MINUTE CALL A nearly half-hour conversation with the lead investigator’s sister after the arraignment. Gee, I wonder what they discussed, The weather? The Patriots? Or maybe… the arraignment that had literally just happened? This is not normal. This is not random. This is access. THEN 13 days after John O’Keefe died…Julie and Chris Albert were finally interviewed. AT 5:30 PM But get this, They were interviewed together, not separately. They were interviewed in their home, not at a station. They were interviewed without Colin present, So the concerned mother brings… Not Colin. Just herself. And sits next to her husband while they give a joint story. This is not how serious homicide investigations usually work. Unless the goal is not clarity… but containment. Right after their interview ends, Julie calls Trooper Proctor’s personal cellphone for 5 seconds (a “call me back” ping) then at 6:21 Proctor calls her back for 4 minutes, because apparently the lead investigator needed a quick check-in with a family whose son was at 34 Fairview minutes before a man was found dying in the snow and he had just interviewed her moments earlier! But they want you to believe they had No special access, No coaching No “off the books” conversations, No preferential treatment, No reason for concern. Just casual chit-chat with the Proctor family on, Arrest Day, Arraignment DayInterview Day Sure. Totally normal. Why is the family of people who were at 34 Fairview BEFORE the discovery of the body… on the phone with the Proctor family more than ANY other witnesses in the entire case? And why does EVERY call line up with, The arrest, The arraignment and The interviews …if all they ever did was “go to a party and go home”?

Dixie Normus

93,051 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

If Lead Investigator Michael Proctor is depraved enough to unlawfully search #KarenRead’s cellphone for nude photographs of her on January 29, 2022, then what’s not to say he wouldn’t delete the Ring cam videos that subsequently went missing, too? FACT: Both the videos in the Ring cam system & the photographs on Karen Read’s cellphone were accessed unlawfully, without search warrants, by Michael Proctor. Proctor also hid his conflict, failed to recuse himself & then lied for the next 2 years, steadfastly defending the falsehood that he wasn’t lifelong family friends with the Albert’s & McCabe’s. We now know that was a lie. But here’s the thing: Karen immediately turned over her cellphone to Trooper Proctor. So if there’s evidence that Ring cam videos were deleted from her cellphone after Michael Proctor seized it, then it’d be pretty damning proof that he deleted the videos. —————— How did Proctor access Karen Read’s cellphone so quickly, on day 1, when he was searching it for nude photos of her? Fully cooperative & eager to help in the investigation, Karen Read promptly accessed her cellphone in front of investigators to provide them with the contact info of everyone who was present the night before with her & John. Notably, Karen Read voluntarily turned her cellphone over to investigators, without a search warrant, when she was FIRST able to speak with them. These are the actions of an honest & forthcoming witness. Not a murderer. —————— The Commonwealth tells on itself, revealing just how Proctor accessed her cellphone without a search warrant (below) in its own filings: “The troopers further asked the defendant for contact information relating to the people she had indicated were present at the bars. The defendant obliged, and prior to providing said information, the troopers observed the defendant to enter a numerical passcode into her phone to unlock it, prior to retrieving said data.” —————— If Proctor preyed upon Karen Read’s trust by secretly watching her enter her passcode to unlock her cellphone, and remembering it for later so he could go through her phone, without a search warrant, looking for nude photos & other things unrelated to the investigation, then we already know he’s perfectly willing to unlawfully access things on her cellphone for nefarious purposes. If Karen had the Ring app on her cellphone, what’s not to say Proctor didn’t access it to delete videos? Ask yourself this: If Karen Read were guilty, would she be asking for Ring data & videos that’d incriminate her? If Trooper Proctor didn’t unlawfully access the Ring app from either John or Karen’s phones to delete videos, then why would he contact & ask Ring wanting to know how long until their stored user data & videos are deleted from their servers for LE? Which is exactly what Proctor did on February 10, 2022, just days after arresting Karen Read, when he contacted them in an email from subpoenas@ring.com stating that the Ring videos had been deleted from DropBox after 90 days. If Proctor’s theory was that Karen struck & killed John with her taillight, breaking it into 45 pieces left at the scene, wouldn’t he be immediately filing a search warrant for those Ring videos to show that proof? If Proctor had unlawfully deleted those Ring videos himself though, he’d probably want to know how long until they’d be gone from Ring’s servers—evidence of HIS consciousness of guilt—so he could run out the clock so that they’re unable to be obtained, even when he does ultimately file a search warrant. Might that explain why he lied, purporting to have had a search warrant when he didn’t, knowing that the defense would’ve immediately filed an emergency motion to preserve that evidence? They ran out the clock & even lied to the defense so that there was no possible way for them to intervene before the evidence was fully destroyed & irretrievable. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
1:39

If Lead Investigator Michael Proctor is depraved enough to unlawfully search #KarenRead’s cellphone for nude photographs of her on January 29, 2022, then what’s not to say he wouldn’t delete the Ring cam videos that subsequently went missing, too? FACT: Both the videos in the Ring cam system & the photographs on Karen Read’s cellphone were accessed unlawfully, without search warrants, by Michael Proctor. Proctor also hid his conflict, failed to recuse himself & then lied for the next 2 years, steadfastly defending the falsehood that he wasn’t lifelong family friends with the Albert’s & McCabe’s. We now know that was a lie. But here’s the thing: Karen immediately turned over her cellphone to Trooper Proctor. So if there’s evidence that Ring cam videos were deleted from her cellphone after Michael Proctor seized it, then it’d be pretty damning proof that he deleted the videos. —————— How did Proctor access Karen Read’s cellphone so quickly, on day 1, when he was searching it for nude photos of her? Fully cooperative & eager to help in the investigation, Karen Read promptly accessed her cellphone in front of investigators to provide them with the contact info of everyone who was present the night before with her & John. Notably, Karen Read voluntarily turned her cellphone over to investigators, without a search warrant, when she was FIRST able to speak with them. These are the actions of an honest & forthcoming witness. Not a murderer. —————— The Commonwealth tells on itself, revealing just how Proctor accessed her cellphone without a search warrant (below) in its own filings: “The troopers further asked the defendant for contact information relating to the people she had indicated were present at the bars. The defendant obliged, and prior to providing said information, the troopers observed the defendant to enter a numerical passcode into her phone to unlock it, prior to retrieving said data.” —————— If Proctor preyed upon Karen Read’s trust by secretly watching her enter her passcode to unlock her cellphone, and remembering it for later so he could go through her phone, without a search warrant, looking for nude photos & other things unrelated to the investigation, then we already know he’s perfectly willing to unlawfully access things on her cellphone for nefarious purposes. If Karen had the Ring app on her cellphone, what’s not to say Proctor didn’t access it to delete videos? Ask yourself this: If Karen Read were guilty, would she be asking for Ring data & videos that’d incriminate her? If Trooper Proctor didn’t unlawfully access the Ring app from either John or Karen’s phones to delete videos, then why would he contact & ask Ring wanting to know how long until their stored user data & videos are deleted from their servers for LE? Which is exactly what Proctor did on February 10, 2022, just days after arresting Karen Read, when he contacted them in an email from [email protected] stating that the Ring videos had been deleted from DropBox after 90 days. If Proctor’s theory was that Karen struck & killed John with her taillight, breaking it into 45 pieces left at the scene, wouldn’t he be immediately filing a search warrant for those Ring videos to show that proof? If Proctor had unlawfully deleted those Ring videos himself though, he’d probably want to know how long until they’d be gone from Ring’s servers—evidence of HIS consciousness of guilt—so he could run out the clock so that they’re unable to be obtained, even when he does ultimately file a search warrant. Might that explain why he lied, purporting to have had a search warrant when he didn’t, knowing that the defense would’ve immediately filed an emergency motion to preserve that evidence? They ran out the clock & even lied to the defense so that there was no possible way for them to intervene before the evidence was fully destroyed & irretrievable. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

153,132 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

THE MISSING CANTON LIBRARY FOOTAGE 🗣🚨 On February 7th, 2022, Louis Jutras from Canton’s IT Division emailed Trooper Dunne (Norfolk County MSP) surveillance footage from the Canton Public Library, per MSP’s request. Because of the town’s camera system setup, the footage was shared via a download link rather than direct files. Dunne then forwarded that same link to lead investigator Trooper Michael Proctor. A follow up email, obtained by @Marbury_v_Mad through a FOIA request, shows that Proctor sought help from Norfolk County Forensic Video Technician Colleen Crawford. But why would Proctor need assistance if the footage could have been easily downloaded and preserved in its raw form, with original metadata? Data that was never provided to Karen Read’s defense team. Then there’s Brian Tully, the officer chosen to testify about this footage. A curious choice since Dunne received the original link and Proctor led the investigation, both would’ve been far more relevant witnesses. As Proctor’s supervisor, Tully would likely have known about the missing footage from the Canton Library. Did he also communicate with Crawford? The original file sent by Jutras was a full one-hour segment (12:00 a.m.–1:00 a.m.), yet the version later used in evidence has missing roughly two minutes from 12:37 a.m. to 12:39 a.m. And now, this newly uncovered correspondence shows Proctor personally thanked Crawford for her help with this very footage.
1:45

THE MISSING CANTON LIBRARY FOOTAGE 🗣🚨 On February 7th, 2022, Louis Jutras from Canton’s IT Division emailed Trooper Dunne (Norfolk County MSP) surveillance footage from the Canton Public Library, per MSP’s request. Because of the town’s camera system setup, the footage was shared via a download link rather than direct files. Dunne then forwarded that same link to lead investigator Trooper Michael Proctor. A follow up email, obtained by @Marbury_v_Mad through a FOIA request, shows that Proctor sought help from Norfolk County Forensic Video Technician Colleen Crawford. But why would Proctor need assistance if the footage could have been easily downloaded and preserved in its raw form, with original metadata? Data that was never provided to Karen Read’s defense team. Then there’s Brian Tully, the officer chosen to testify about this footage. A curious choice since Dunne received the original link and Proctor led the investigation, both would’ve been far more relevant witnesses. As Proctor’s supervisor, Tully would likely have known about the missing footage from the Canton Library. Did he also communicate with Crawford? The original file sent by Jutras was a full one-hour segment (12:00 a.m.–1:00 a.m.), yet the version later used in evidence has missing roughly two minutes from 12:37 a.m. to 12:39 a.m. And now, this newly uncovered correspondence shows Proctor personally thanked Crawford for her help with this very footage.

BoozeyBeauty

92,443 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

So Julie Albert barely knows Michael Proctor, but she was with him for weddings, baby showers, gender reveals, Thanksgiving, cook outs, babysat for him, went to his parent's home, his sister's home, and his home, but she doesn't know him like that. And somehow she only babysat for Michael Proctor, ONCE- YEARS AGO, but he somehow, out of the blue, asked her to babysit 10 days before John O'Keefe's murder?? It's also funny how her memory goes when asked questions about her text to Courtney Proctor about getting him "a gift" after the murder. Watching her glitch out is crazy. These people are diabolical. They made it look like they hardly know Proctor or his family during the trial. Go watch these videos for yourself on The Trial Channel and you be the judge. It's WILD. If these people are "just witnesses" why the lies? Why the reluctance to give up their phones? #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #TurtleboyWasRight #MSP #MichaelProctor #JulieAlbert #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #ChrisAlbert
3:16

So Julie Albert barely knows Michael Proctor, but she was with him for weddings, baby showers, gender reveals, Thanksgiving, cook outs, babysat for him, went to his parent's home, his sister's home, and his home, but she doesn't know him like that. And somehow she only babysat for Michael Proctor, ONCE- YEARS AGO, but he somehow, out of the blue, asked her to babysit 10 days before John O'Keefe's murder?? It's also funny how her memory goes when asked questions about her text to Courtney Proctor about getting him "a gift" after the murder. Watching her glitch out is crazy. These people are diabolical. They made it look like they hardly know Proctor or his family during the trial. Go watch these videos for yourself on The Trial Channel and you be the judge. It's WILD. If these people are "just witnesses" why the lies? Why the reluctance to give up their phones? #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #TurtleboyWasRight #MSP #MichaelProctor #JulieAlbert #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #ChrisAlbert

That Girl T

43,620 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

FaCt cHecK oF thE dAY! 🌟 Jumping to conclusions will always lead to a faulty landing. Claim: Kerry Roberts says she and Jennifer McCabe “willingly handed over their phones,” while Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything.” Rating: ❌ False What the trial testimony actually shows: On January 29, 2022, Massachusetts State Police Michael Proctor and Yuri Bukhenik went to Karen Read’s parents’ home after Karen told police where she was when contacted. During Trial 1, Michael Proctor testified that: 🔹️They seized Karen Read’s cell phone 🔹️They seized her Lexus SUV 🔹️A search warrant had not yet been written and would be done after the seizure Also in Trial 1, Yuri Bukhenik testified that: 🔹️After Karen’s interview concluded, police told her they would be seizing her phone and her vehicle In Trial 2, Bukhenik reconfirmed: 🔹️The phone and vehicle were seized without a warrant 🔹️The warrant was written after the fact Kerry Roberts’ statement is false because Karen Read: ✅️ Voluntarily told police her location ✅️ Allowed police into her parents’ home ✅️ Turned over her cell phone ✅️ Turned over her Lexus SUV ❌ Police did not have a search warrant ❌ She did not resist or refuse She surrendered two of the most critical pieces of evidence before any warrant existed... something defendants are not legally required to do. Bottom line is that a warrantless seizure voluntarily complied with is still voluntary cooperation. Claiming Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything” is directly contradicted by sworn trial testimony (including testimony from the very officers who seized the evidence). The record shows voluntary cooperation without a warrant and stating otherwise is not a difference of perspective, it’s factually wrong. 🤯
1:16

FaCt cHecK oF thE dAY! 🌟 Jumping to conclusions will always lead to a faulty landing. Claim: Kerry Roberts says she and Jennifer McCabe “willingly handed over their phones,” while Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything.” Rating: ❌ False What the trial testimony actually shows: On January 29, 2022, Massachusetts State Police Michael Proctor and Yuri Bukhenik went to Karen Read’s parents’ home after Karen told police where she was when contacted. During Trial 1, Michael Proctor testified that: 🔹️They seized Karen Read’s cell phone 🔹️They seized her Lexus SUV 🔹️A search warrant had not yet been written and would be done after the seizure Also in Trial 1, Yuri Bukhenik testified that: 🔹️After Karen’s interview concluded, police told her they would be seizing her phone and her vehicle In Trial 2, Bukhenik reconfirmed: 🔹️The phone and vehicle were seized without a warrant 🔹️The warrant was written after the fact Kerry Roberts’ statement is false because Karen Read: ✅️ Voluntarily told police her location ✅️ Allowed police into her parents’ home ✅️ Turned over her cell phone ✅️ Turned over her Lexus SUV ❌ Police did not have a search warrant ❌ She did not resist or refuse She surrendered two of the most critical pieces of evidence before any warrant existed... something defendants are not legally required to do. Bottom line is that a warrantless seizure voluntarily complied with is still voluntary cooperation. Claiming Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything” is directly contradicted by sworn trial testimony (including testimony from the very officers who seized the evidence). The record shows voluntary cooperation without a warrant and stating otherwise is not a difference of perspective, it’s factually wrong. 🤯

BoozeyBeauty

22,911 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

During Emily D. Baker ⚖️ 💜’s reading of Karen Read’s Motion to Compel, a significant allegation emerged. According to former MSP Trooper Michael Proctor’s own notes, he knew Colin Albert was inside 34 Fairview on the night Officer John O’Keefe was found dying on Brian Albert’s lawn on January 29, 2022. Yet Colin Albert was reportedly omitted from Proctor’s report and was not formally interviewed until approximately 18 months later. Think about that. A person Proctor allegedly knew was present inside the house was left out of his report and wasn’t questioned for a year and a half. If these allegations are accurate, they raise serious questions about the thoroughness and objectivity of the investigation. Why would someone known to be inside the house not be included in the report? Why the 18-month delay? Transparency matters. Accountability matters. And the public deserves answers. #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Proctor #proctored
0:49

During Emily D. Baker ⚖️ 💜’s reading of Karen Read’s Motion to Compel, a significant allegation emerged. According to former MSP Trooper Michael Proctor’s own notes, he knew Colin Albert was inside 34 Fairview on the night Officer John O’Keefe was found dying on Brian Albert’s lawn on January 29, 2022. Yet Colin Albert was reportedly omitted from Proctor’s report and was not formally interviewed until approximately 18 months later. Think about that. A person Proctor allegedly knew was present inside the house was left out of his report and wasn’t questioned for a year and a half. If these allegations are accurate, they raise serious questions about the thoroughness and objectivity of the investigation. Why would someone known to be inside the house not be included in the report? Why the 18-month delay? Transparency matters. Accountability matters. And the public deserves answers. #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Proctor #proctored

Kelly💚🌴

42,738 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

there is another important detail in Julie’s text thread that is easy to overlook. she never actually answered Michael Proctor’s question. Proctor told her that Colin’s attorney was not returning his calls. He asked Julie and Chris to speak with Colin and find out what day and time worked for another interview. Julie did not say she would ask Colin. She did not provide a date. She did not refer Proctor back to the attorney. She did not decline. Instead, she answered only the personal part “Same to you and E. It all really sucks. Hope the kids are doing good.” Proctor then gave that response a thumbs-up. So where is the rest of the conversation? How was Colin’s interview ultimately coordinated? Was it done over the phone, through Chris, through the attorney, or through messages that were no longer present? Because the one Proctor exchange investigators found on Julie’s phone contains a request, but no actual answer.
1:49

there is another important detail in Julie’s text thread that is easy to overlook. she never actually answered Michael Proctor’s question. Proctor told her that Colin’s attorney was not returning his calls. He asked Julie and Chris to speak with Colin and find out what day and time worked for another interview. Julie did not say she would ask Colin. She did not provide a date. She did not refer Proctor back to the attorney. She did not decline. Instead, she answered only the personal part “Same to you and E. It all really sucks. Hope the kids are doing good.” Proctor then gave that response a thumbs-up. So where is the rest of the conversation? How was Colin’s interview ultimately coordinated? Was it done over the phone, through Chris, through the attorney, or through messages that were no longer present? Because the one Proctor exchange investigators found on Julie’s phone contains a request, but no actual answer.

Dixie Normus

32,262 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce