Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Máster ordered: ruin those balls with your mallet. 100 hard mallet blows #ballbusting #cbt #eunuch #castration #bdsm

angeloargentin5

2,674 subscribers

27,768 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #ballbusting #cbt #eunuch #castration #bdsm

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Just Posted: Describe the medical effects of your BB Kicks -- Watch Now: ."...Your nuts squash to half-size in 0.1 seconds, a massive vagus nerve shockwave rips through you, blood pressure crashes so hard the room spins, and your stomach flips like you’re on a rollercoaster drop. Two seconds later you’re on your knees, cold sweat pouring, breathing in desperate little gasps while those poor balls balloon purple and hot. I’ll trace the swelling with my big toe and purr, “Mmm, look how fast they’re growing for me, sweetie.” Good thing I’m a girl and I could never feel..." #ballsqueeze #ballbusting #femdom #ai

Just Posted: Describe the medical effects of your BB Kicks -- Watch Now: ."...Your nuts squash to half-size in 0.1 seconds, a massive vagus nerve shockwave rips through you, blood pressure crashes so hard the room spins, and your stomach flips like you’re on a rollercoaster drop. Two seconds later you’re on your knees, cold sweat pouring, breathing in desperate little gasps while those poor balls balloon purple and hot. I’ll trace the swelling with my big toe and purr, “Mmm, look how fast they’re growing for me, sweetie.” Good thing I’m a girl and I could never feel..." #ballsqueeze #ballbusting #femdom #ai

Ballbusting.Ai

21,247 views • 8 months ago

If there’s anything definitively “what you make of it,” dinner is that on the regular. Enter: cutlet maxxing. Start with a chicken breast. Pound it thin—not just to tenderize, but to create maximum surface area for flavor. Lay a thin slice of prosciutto right on top before the pass of the mallet (or tortilla press) so the salt and fat get hammered into the meat. The prosciutto essentially becomes part of the cutlet. Now the holy trinity: -Seasoned flour (salt, pepper, garlic powder, maybe a whisper of smoked paprika). -Egg wash spiked with grated Parm, black pepper, and a splash of milk. -Panko breadcrumbs mixed with more grated cheese and Italian herbs. Press the breading in hard so it sticks like armor. Fry in a generous layer of olive oil + butter until deep golden and crispy. Drain on a rack. Top with marinara, fresh mozzarella, and more Parm, then broil until bubbly and blistered. Serve with spaghetti or just a massive salad so you can pretend you’re balanced. This isn’t basic chicken parm. This is cutlet maxxing—crispy, juicy, salty, cheesy, stupidly good. One bite and your socks are gone.

If there’s anything definitively “what you make of it,” dinner is that on the regular. Enter: cutlet maxxing. Start with a chicken breast. Pound it thin—not just to tenderize, but to create maximum surface area for flavor. Lay a thin slice of prosciutto right on top before the pass of the mallet (or tortilla press) so the salt and fat get hammered into the meat. The prosciutto essentially becomes part of the cutlet. Now the holy trinity: -Seasoned flour (salt, pepper, garlic powder, maybe a whisper of smoked paprika). -Egg wash spiked with grated Parm, black pepper, and a splash of milk. -Panko breadcrumbs mixed with more grated cheese and Italian herbs. Press the breading in hard so it sticks like armor. Fry in a generous layer of olive oil + butter until deep golden and crispy. Drain on a rack. Top with marinara, fresh mozzarella, and more Parm, then broil until bubbly and blistered. Serve with spaghetti or just a massive salad so you can pretend you’re balanced. This isn’t basic chicken parm. This is cutlet maxxing—crispy, juicy, salty, cheesy, stupidly good. One bite and your socks are gone.

🚫👁️Drinks on Saturday🇺🇸

282,072 views • 3 months ago

"the people who struggle with coding agents are those who try to push their way too hard. partially why I find coding with agents easy is that I've led engineering teams before". this is a unique view on AI coding, that to maximize your output you have to "let go" a bit and accept that the way AI will build the project might not be 100% aligned with your way, it might not even be 100% correct, but it will push the project forward. and if you realize later that you don't like an approach, you can always go back to it later and iterate over it. so there's not always an absolute total gain, but the overall performance is what matters in the end.

"the people who struggle with coding agents are those who try to push their way too hard. partially why I find coding with agents easy is that I've led engineering teams before". this is a unique view on AI coding, that to maximize your output you have to "let go" a bit and accept that the way AI will build the project might not be 100% aligned with your way, it might not even be 100% correct, but it will push the project forward. and if you realize later that you don't like an approach, you can always go back to it later and iterate over it. so there's not always an absolute total gain, but the overall performance is what matters in the end.

ℏεsam

165,093 views • 6 months ago

Chicken fried steak is a true Southern tradition that every modern man should master. Start by pounding cube steaks (or tenderized round steak) to about ¼-inch thick with a meat mallet to ensure they’re fork-tender. Season both sides generously with salt, pepper, garlic powder, and paprika. Set up your dredging station: one bowl with 1 cup all-purpose flour mixed with the same seasonings, and another with 2 eggs beaten with 2 tablespoons of milk for the egg wash. Dredge each steak in the seasoned flour, dip it fully in the egg wash, then dredge again in flour, pressing the coating on firmly so it sticks. Heat about ½ inch of canola or vegetable oil in a cast-iron skillet to 350°F. Fry the steaks 3–4 minutes per side until deep golden brown and crispy, then drain on a wire rack. For the gravy, pour off all but 3 tablespoons of the pan drippings, whisk in 3 tablespoons of flour, and cook for about a minute. Slowly pour in 2 cups of milk while whisking constantly until the gravy thickens and bubbles. Season with salt and plenty of black pepper. Slather those crispy steaks generously with the creamy pepper gravy and serve alongside hot buttermilk biscuits. Add mashed potatoes or fried eggs if you’re feeling extra. This crispy, tender, gravy-soaked classic comes together in under 45 minutes and delivers pure comfort on a plate. A meal fit for modern man. 🇺🇸

Chicken fried steak is a true Southern tradition that every modern man should master. Start by pounding cube steaks (or tenderized round steak) to about ¼-inch thick with a meat mallet to ensure they’re fork-tender. Season both sides generously with salt, pepper, garlic powder, and paprika. Set up your dredging station: one bowl with 1 cup all-purpose flour mixed with the same seasonings, and another with 2 eggs beaten with 2 tablespoons of milk for the egg wash. Dredge each steak in the seasoned flour, dip it fully in the egg wash, then dredge again in flour, pressing the coating on firmly so it sticks. Heat about ½ inch of canola or vegetable oil in a cast-iron skillet to 350°F. Fry the steaks 3–4 minutes per side until deep golden brown and crispy, then drain on a wire rack. For the gravy, pour off all but 3 tablespoons of the pan drippings, whisk in 3 tablespoons of flour, and cook for about a minute. Slowly pour in 2 cups of milk while whisking constantly until the gravy thickens and bubbles. Season with salt and plenty of black pepper. Slather those crispy steaks generously with the creamy pepper gravy and serve alongside hot buttermilk biscuits. Add mashed potatoes or fried eggs if you’re feeling extra. This crispy, tender, gravy-soaked classic comes together in under 45 minutes and delivers pure comfort on a plate. A meal fit for modern man. 🇺🇸

🚫👁️Drinks on Saturday🇺🇸

195,596 views • 3 months ago

#Bears S Kevin Byard speaks on #Browns QB Shedeur Sanders' situation & the importance of getting game balls (this speaks to those on social media who said no adult should care about that), AND having a trusting relationship with your coach. “Everybody knows, everybody sees this guy is talented; & for him to go out there and get a win (in his 1st start), especially with the season that they’ve had, I think that would’ve been huge. “You see the locker room of the teams that are winning, you see the teams that really care about each other, cause even from a coach’s to a player relationship…especially..even for the younger generation, until you can develop that type of trust with a player and coach, & a player knows that coach actually cares about them on a human level it’s hard to connect—to try to encourage this guy, or like say I need you to play better and have those tough conversations. Because if a guy don’t feel like you really care about him, it’s like..I don’t care about you.” (This is a cut down CLIP, watch below): FULL INTERVIEW LINK on You Tube: Subscribe & support independent media.

#Bears S Kevin Byard speaks on #Browns QB Shedeur Sanders' situation & the importance of getting game balls (this speaks to those on social media who said no adult should care about that), AND having a trusting relationship with your coach. “Everybody knows, everybody sees this guy is talented; & for him to go out there and get a win (in his 1st start), especially with the season that they’ve had, I think that would’ve been huge. “You see the locker room of the teams that are winning, you see the teams that really care about each other, cause even from a coach’s to a player relationship…especially..even for the younger generation, until you can develop that type of trust with a player and coach, & a player knows that coach actually cares about them on a human level it’s hard to connect—to try to encourage this guy, or like say I need you to play better and have those tough conversations. Because if a guy don’t feel like you really care about him, it’s like..I don’t care about you.” (This is a cut down CLIP, watch below): FULL INTERVIEW LINK on You Tube: Subscribe & support independent media.

JosinaAnderson

239,787 views • 8 months ago

More than 5 million people have opened a slice savings account in the past year. All of them earn 100% of the repo rate daily, 5.25% p.a. right now Today, we’re rolling out slice atom, our newest addition to slice savings account, because savings is much more than expenses 😸 Your savings hold much more than spending money. It's your emergency buffer, your next trip, your goals, your spare change. We are unbundling it for India, so you have full control and clarity over your money You split your one balance into separate atoms, one for each thing you care about. The money in an atom keeps earning the same 5.25% as the rest of your account. You can take it back the moment you need it, no penalty, and it lands in your main balance within seconds, ready for UPI transactions or a transfer An atom can fill itself, too. Set it to take in a fixed amount every day, week or month, or to round your spending up to the nearest ₹10 and quietly set the difference aside Millions of people trust slice with their savings now. People work hard for that money. So the least we can do is keep paying close attention to what they actually need. atom meets one of those needs!

More than 5 million people have opened a slice savings account in the past year. All of them earn 100% of the repo rate daily, 5.25% p.a. right now Today, we’re rolling out slice atom, our newest addition to slice savings account, because savings is much more than expenses 😸 Your savings hold much more than spending money. It's your emergency buffer, your next trip, your goals, your spare change. We are unbundling it for India, so you have full control and clarity over your money You split your one balance into separate atoms, one for each thing you care about. The money in an atom keeps earning the same 5.25% as the rest of your account. You can take it back the moment you need it, no penalty, and it lands in your main balance within seconds, ready for UPI transactions or a transfer An atom can fill itself, too. Set it to take in a fixed amount every day, week or month, or to round your spending up to the nearest ₹10 and quietly set the difference aside Millions of people trust slice with their savings now. People work hard for that money. So the least we can do is keep paying close attention to what they actually need. atom meets one of those needs!

Rajan Bajaj

41,614 views • 2 months ago

Nick Saban shares what transformational leadership really looks like and the trap most leaders fall into. "If you're in any kind of managerial position, I think you should define your job the same way: Provide the leadership to develop the relationships to help people create and accomplish the opportunities that they have, and help them establish the discipline they need to do it." Then he broke down what leadership actually is: "Leadership is about helping somebody else, affecting somebody else for their benefit. Not for your benefit - for their benefit." "If you're doing it for your benefit, it's manipulation. And people can see right through that." That's the line right there... Leadership serves others. Manipulation serves yourself. "You gotta develop a relationship, because they gotta know you care. Hard to affect people if they don't think you care about them." Then he called out where most leaders spend their time: "How do you spend all your time? If you're a manager, you spend all your time with the people who don't do the right things. I call them energy vampires." "We got 5 guys on our team - they don't go to class, they don't do the right thing in practice, they loaf all the time. Those are the guys I meet with every day. They're energy vampires." So he made a commitment: "I'm gonna meet with 3 guys who didn't do anything wrong every day to see how they're doing. To make sure they know I care about them, their family, and what's happening in their life." "I wanna have a relationship with those people, so that when I need to affect them, I have a chance to do it." "People gotta know you care. If they think you only care about yourself, they're gonna think you're just a manipulator and you're not really going to affect them in a positive way." "You gotta serve other people." The core of servant leadership is wanting to see others at their best. It's not about control, it's about serving others. (🎥 CBT Automotive)

Nick Saban shares what transformational leadership really looks like and the trap most leaders fall into. "If you're in any kind of managerial position, I think you should define your job the same way: Provide the leadership to develop the relationships to help people create and accomplish the opportunities that they have, and help them establish the discipline they need to do it." Then he broke down what leadership actually is: "Leadership is about helping somebody else, affecting somebody else for their benefit. Not for your benefit - for their benefit." "If you're doing it for your benefit, it's manipulation. And people can see right through that." That's the line right there... Leadership serves others. Manipulation serves yourself. "You gotta develop a relationship, because they gotta know you care. Hard to affect people if they don't think you care about them." Then he called out where most leaders spend their time: "How do you spend all your time? If you're a manager, you spend all your time with the people who don't do the right things. I call them energy vampires." "We got 5 guys on our team - they don't go to class, they don't do the right thing in practice, they loaf all the time. Those are the guys I meet with every day. They're energy vampires." So he made a commitment: "I'm gonna meet with 3 guys who didn't do anything wrong every day to see how they're doing. To make sure they know I care about them, their family, and what's happening in their life." "I wanna have a relationship with those people, so that when I need to affect them, I have a chance to do it." "People gotta know you care. If they think you only care about yourself, they're gonna think you're just a manipulator and you're not really going to affect them in a positive way." "You gotta serve other people." The core of servant leadership is wanting to see others at their best. It's not about control, it's about serving others. (🎥 CBT Automotive)

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

37,867 views • 4 months ago

Calling all pigs, pervs, bators, gooners, porn stars and lurkers, Scam culture is pervasive these days, even now having infiltrated Gay Porn Twittersphere™️. Be wary of any account in any online space who says they’ll send you a “check.” The only people who work with checks are scammers (and maybe sometimes your rental agency or landlord). Moreover, if the check is for any amount over the amount you are allegedly entitled to, or if you are asked to send any of those funds back, you are 100%, no doubts about it, being socially engineered to fall for a scam. That check is fake. It will bounce. You will have paid a scammer your hard-earned money while simultaneously making yourself liable for the full amount of the counterfeit check. This account @thomasmurarrt probably once did belong to a legit gay artist. Unfortunately, it is now in the hands of a predator. Please feel free to blow up this account until its owner runs tearfully off into the twisting nether. Your firewall of the filth-forward, Ace

Calling all pigs, pervs, bators, gooners, porn stars and lurkers, Scam culture is pervasive these days, even now having infiltrated Gay Porn Twittersphere™️. Be wary of any account in any online space who says they’ll send you a “check.” The only people who work with checks are scammers (and maybe sometimes your rental agency or landlord). Moreover, if the check is for any amount over the amount you are allegedly entitled to, or if you are asked to send any of those funds back, you are 100%, no doubts about it, being socially engineered to fall for a scam. That check is fake. It will bounce. You will have paid a scammer your hard-earned money while simultaneously making yourself liable for the full amount of the counterfeit check. This account @thomasmurarrt probably once did belong to a legit gay artist. Unfortunately, it is now in the hands of a predator. Please feel free to blow up this account until its owner runs tearfully off into the twisting nether. Your firewall of the filth-forward, Ace

Ace Squalor

18,102 views • 1 year ago

Eric Schmidt on how he uses 5-year plans to predict if a startup can become a $100 billion company “If you went to business school, you would’ve been taught: build a great product, organize a sales force, charge a fair price, make the customer happy.” But, as the former CEO of Google explains, that strategy is insufficiently scalable in the Internet era: “It’ll produce a reasonable business, but it’s not going to produce a huge business. It’s just too hard to hire all of those salespeople, work with every customer, and so forth. You have to have a more clever strategy.” Eric continues: “All of the really big companies have invented a new way to access information or a new way to do something [and didn’t require a large salesforce].” Eric argues that lots of the startup ideas he hears are good, but not good enough. He tells these founders to do a plan over the next five years and map your growth rate. Then try to figure out what a more scalable strategy might be. For example, if you’re building an app that you want to charge $10 for, Eric would ask: “Why can’t you give the app away for free and then upsell the users?” Another way to use a five-year plan to determine if your company can be a $100 billion company is to ask yourself what the big platforms will be five years from now and make sure your company is aligned with those platforms. In this interview from 2016, he predicts Android, iOS, and machine learning are the platforms he’d want to be aligned with over the next five years. Video source: Startup Grind (2016)

Eric Schmidt on how he uses 5-year plans to predict if a startup can become a $100 billion company “If you went to business school, you would’ve been taught: build a great product, organize a sales force, charge a fair price, make the customer happy.” But, as the former CEO of Google explains, that strategy is insufficiently scalable in the Internet era: “It’ll produce a reasonable business, but it’s not going to produce a huge business. It’s just too hard to hire all of those salespeople, work with every customer, and so forth. You have to have a more clever strategy.” Eric continues: “All of the really big companies have invented a new way to access information or a new way to do something [and didn’t require a large salesforce].” Eric argues that lots of the startup ideas he hears are good, but not good enough. He tells these founders to do a plan over the next five years and map your growth rate. Then try to figure out what a more scalable strategy might be. For example, if you’re building an app that you want to charge $10 for, Eric would ask: “Why can’t you give the app away for free and then upsell the users?” Another way to use a five-year plan to determine if your company can be a $100 billion company is to ask yourself what the big platforms will be five years from now and make sure your company is aligned with those platforms. In this interview from 2016, he predicts Android, iOS, and machine learning are the platforms he’d want to be aligned with over the next five years. Video source: Startup Grind (2016)

Startup Archive

58,465 views • 1 year ago

Joe Rogan wants you to be successful so he just made 28 year old billionaire MrBeast reveal the blueprint for how anyone can make their first $1,000,000 online or in real life: NOTE: This post involves using your attention span. You will be tempted to bookmark this for later and go back to brain rot. Ignore that urge. You will never get back to it later. Be present for 2 minutes and change your life. BEAST: “Success comes down to 4 factors: Time, friend group, iterations made each day improving your skill level, and consuming all knowledge available. Ignore outliers that got successful without those 4 factors. They probably got lucky. If someone wanted to be a successful podcaster they can’t just listen to the Joe Rogan Experience and have that skill. They have to do 500 mock podcasts while also consuming your show to learn what makes it so successful. Combine that with being friends with other people who are obsessed with being a successful podcaster and then you have a chance at being successful. You can do all that and it still might take 10 years to be successful and there’s still a risk that you won’t ever have that success. You probably won’t make $100 million dollars, but it’s possible that you could make $100,000 per year.” ROGAN: “If you want to make a million dollars you can either win the lottery or work really hard. People love to say the odds of anything working outside of a traditional 9-5 are so low, but have you ever considered the odds of death? There’s a 100% chance you’ll die so why not go for your dreams.”

Joe Rogan wants you to be successful so he just made 28 year old billionaire MrBeast reveal the blueprint for how anyone can make their first $1,000,000 online or in real life: NOTE: This post involves using your attention span. You will be tempted to bookmark this for later and go back to brain rot. Ignore that urge. You will never get back to it later. Be present for 2 minutes and change your life. BEAST: “Success comes down to 4 factors: Time, friend group, iterations made each day improving your skill level, and consuming all knowledge available. Ignore outliers that got successful without those 4 factors. They probably got lucky. If someone wanted to be a successful podcaster they can’t just listen to the Joe Rogan Experience and have that skill. They have to do 500 mock podcasts while also consuming your show to learn what makes it so successful. Combine that with being friends with other people who are obsessed with being a successful podcaster and then you have a chance at being successful. You can do all that and it still might take 10 years to be successful and there’s still a risk that you won’t ever have that success. You probably won’t make $100 million dollars, but it’s possible that you could make $100,000 per year.” ROGAN: “If you want to make a million dollars you can either win the lottery or work really hard. People love to say the odds of anything working outside of a traditional 9-5 are so low, but have you ever considered the odds of death? There’s a 100% chance you’ll die so why not go for your dreams.”

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

399,381 views • 27 days ago

ex-Citadel portfolio manager, just explained why almost every fund actually blows up. "90% of hedge fund failures, PM failures, analyst failures, it's bad portfolio construction, sizing, all those things." the logic: alpha is competitive. one good idea barely moves the needle, because the moment you build a book, correlation starts eating you. "any amount of correlation in a portfolio drags your sharpe ratio toward the market's." and the market's sharpe you can buy for free from Vanguard. so the entire game collapses to two things: generate a positive hit rate across enough independent bets, and kill the correlation between them. the funds that survive run 80-90% of their risk in idiosyncratic, stock-specific bets. only 10-20% is allowed to be factor exposure. and they treat every factor bet, momentum, crowding, "long the AI trade", like a single stock position, with the same hard limits and the same diligence. the ones who blow up almost always had the ideas. they just leaked P&L on risk they never meant to take. "what they got wrong was risk and portfolio construction." clip from "Odds on Open"

ex-Citadel portfolio manager, just explained why almost every fund actually blows up. "90% of hedge fund failures, PM failures, analyst failures, it's bad portfolio construction, sizing, all those things." the logic: alpha is competitive. one good idea barely moves the needle, because the moment you build a book, correlation starts eating you. "any amount of correlation in a portfolio drags your sharpe ratio toward the market's." and the market's sharpe you can buy for free from Vanguard. so the entire game collapses to two things: generate a positive hit rate across enough independent bets, and kill the correlation between them. the funds that survive run 80-90% of their risk in idiosyncratic, stock-specific bets. only 10-20% is allowed to be factor exposure. and they treat every factor bet, momentum, crowding, "long the AI trade", like a single stock position, with the same hard limits and the same diligence. the ones who blow up almost always had the ideas. they just leaked P&L on risk they never meant to take. "what they got wrong was risk and portfolio construction." clip from "Odds on Open"

Goshawk Trades

39,360 views • 1 month ago

Pre-Game Aston Villa v Spurs I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve started these videos saying this game is absolutely huge. We have 4 cup finals left to play. I love De Zerbi’s passion; let’s hope his positivity got the players fired up. Villa Park won’t be quiet, but neither will Spurs fans;we will do our bit to silence them. Let’s press hard, give them no space to breathe. We must win those 50/50s and 2nd balls; they have one eye on their Europa semi-final; how committed will they be? We must leave everything on that pitch; we have 8 days to recover afterwards. We are the underdogs for sure, but we can do this. This one’s for every fan who’s been through hell with this club. For every “Spursy” insult we’ve suffered, we’re about to shove them back down their throats. This is about survival and pride. We aren’t here to park the bus. No fear. No surrender. I’m happy with team bar Muani. Let’s take three points back down the motorway; it’s now or never. I’m going for a 2-1 win; let me know your thoughts & prediction ? #COYS 💙🤍

Pre-Game Aston Villa v Spurs I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve started these videos saying this game is absolutely huge. We have 4 cup finals left to play. I love De Zerbi’s passion; let’s hope his positivity got the players fired up. Villa Park won’t be quiet, but neither will Spurs fans;we will do our bit to silence them. Let’s press hard, give them no space to breathe. We must win those 50/50s and 2nd balls; they have one eye on their Europa semi-final; how committed will they be? We must leave everything on that pitch; we have 8 days to recover afterwards. We are the underdogs for sure, but we can do this. This one’s for every fan who’s been through hell with this club. For every “Spursy” insult we’ve suffered, we’re about to shove them back down their throats. This is about survival and pride. We aren’t here to park the bus. No fear. No surrender. I’m happy with team bar Muani. Let’s take three points back down the motorway; it’s now or never. I’m going for a 2-1 win; let me know your thoughts & prediction ? #COYS 💙🤍

Jonny H

12,909 views • 3 months ago

Stanley Druckenmiller shorted 12 internet stocks in March 1999. All 12 eventually went bankrupt. He still lost $600 million in three weeks. He put on $200 million of short exposure. The stocks ran against him so hard he covered at a 300% loss. Three weeks. Twelve picks. Zero wrong calls in the end. The asymmetry of shorting eats you even when you're right. When you're long, the worst case is minus 100%. The stock goes to zero, you lose what you put in, it's over. When you're short, there's no worst case. A $10 stock becomes a $40 stock becomes a $100 stock, and your margin clerk calls before the thesis plays out. Druckenmiller put it plainly. Dead wrong on a long, you lose 100%. Dead wrong on a short, you lose 10x your money. The dot-com names he shorted went parabolic between March and April 1999. Every one of them eventually went to zero. Most of them tripled or quadrupled first. He was right on direction. He was wrong on timing. In short selling, those are the same thing. This is the guy who ran Quantum Fund with Soros. Roughly 30% annualized for three decades at Duquesne. One of the greatest macro investors of the last half century. His own assessment after 40 years: "Frankly, I'm not sure I've ever made money in shorts." If Druckenmiller can't make money shorting, the retail trader typing a put order during market hours is not going to make money shorting either. The math doesn't care about your conviction. Longs compound. Shorts decay. Time is the enemy of the short seller, and the market will burn your position to ash waiting for you to be proven right.

Stanley Druckenmiller shorted 12 internet stocks in March 1999. All 12 eventually went bankrupt. He still lost $600 million in three weeks. He put on $200 million of short exposure. The stocks ran against him so hard he covered at a 300% loss. Three weeks. Twelve picks. Zero wrong calls in the end. The asymmetry of shorting eats you even when you're right. When you're long, the worst case is minus 100%. The stock goes to zero, you lose what you put in, it's over. When you're short, there's no worst case. A $10 stock becomes a $40 stock becomes a $100 stock, and your margin clerk calls before the thesis plays out. Druckenmiller put it plainly. Dead wrong on a long, you lose 100%. Dead wrong on a short, you lose 10x your money. The dot-com names he shorted went parabolic between March and April 1999. Every one of them eventually went to zero. Most of them tripled or quadrupled first. He was right on direction. He was wrong on timing. In short selling, those are the same thing. This is the guy who ran Quantum Fund with Soros. Roughly 30% annualized for three decades at Duquesne. One of the greatest macro investors of the last half century. His own assessment after 40 years: "Frankly, I'm not sure I've ever made money in shorts." If Druckenmiller can't make money shorting, the retail trader typing a put order during market hours is not going to make money shorting either. The math doesn't care about your conviction. Longs compound. Shorts decay. Time is the enemy of the short seller, and the market will burn your position to ash waiting for you to be proven right.

Aakash Gupta

34,568 views • 4 months ago

As I promised yesterday, I'll briefly explain LoRA training and share a workflow I made so you can do it quickly. First, let me answer a very common question: 'Why train LoRAs when we have such advanced models?' Even though we have incredibly advanced models now (like NBP), we still can't always get them to do specific things we want. Simplest example: the spritesheet LoRA I made the other day. I generated 1000 images with Nano Banana and only 100 were what I wanted. The LoRA I trained using those 100 images gives me nearly 100% consistent results. Second point is cost and speed. With LoRA, we can cut costs by 4-5x. And while doing that, we're generating 4-5x faster. How many images do you need for a good LoRA? This depends on your LoRA's complexity. For example, when I training the spritesheet LoRA, even though I used 100 images, I didn't include buildings in the training data, so this LoRA doesn't work for buildings. So think about your LoRA's use cases and add examples for as many use cases as possible to improve quality. What are paired images and how to train LoRAs for image-editing? When training LoRAs for image editing on fal, we call each edit example paired images - one with _start suffix, one with _end suffix. For example, if you're training a background remove LoRA, the unedited original photo will be your '_start' image. The image with background removed will be the '_end' image. Simply put: images we want to edit or use as reference get _start, target images we want to achieve get '_end'. Important: save both images with the same name. Like image332_start.jpg and image332_end.jpg. This way the system knows which images pair together. What about training LoRAs for models with multiple image inputs? Same logic. We still use _start and _end suffixes, but with one difference. Since there are multiple input images, we can number them: _start, _start1, _start2. Example: start images, 1st image = Woman portrait (image35_start.jpg) 2nd image = Glasses photo (image35_start1.jpg) 3rd image = Hat photo (image35_start2.jpg) Output image = portrait of woman wearing glasses and hat (image35_end.jpg) Can we do more detailed captioning? Yes. Similarly, you can improve training quality by creating a txt file for each set with the caption inside. Example: create image35.txt and write: 'Recreate the image by putting the glasses from the second image and the hat from the third image on the woman in the first image.' What are Steps? How many should I use? What's Learning Rate? Steps determines how many times the model sees and processes your training data (your images). Each step, the model learns a bit more. But as steps increase, so does the risk of overfitting. So there's no real default. But for a simpler LoRA with 20 paired images, 1000 steps is ideal. Here's a metaphor for the Steps and Learning Rate relationship: Imagine you have a balloon. Our goal is to inflate it to the optimal size. Steps = How many times we blow into the balloon Learning rate = How hard we blow each time If we blow too softly, we need to blow many more times. If we blow too hard, we risk popping it quickly and can't reach optimal size. Of course training won't explode, but it won't work as intended because it wasn't trained optimally. Training's done, now what? Once training's complete, you'll have a safetensors file. Every model you train on fal has a LoRA inference endpoint. In that inference, add your safetensors file link to the LoRA url input, and you can use your LoRA. Thanks for the read! The workflow in the video: If I forgot anything, let me know in the replies.

As I promised yesterday, I'll briefly explain LoRA training and share a workflow I made so you can do it quickly. First, let me answer a very common question: 'Why train LoRAs when we have such advanced models?' Even though we have incredibly advanced models now (like NBP), we still can't always get them to do specific things we want. Simplest example: the spritesheet LoRA I made the other day. I generated 1000 images with Nano Banana and only 100 were what I wanted. The LoRA I trained using those 100 images gives me nearly 100% consistent results. Second point is cost and speed. With LoRA, we can cut costs by 4-5x. And while doing that, we're generating 4-5x faster. How many images do you need for a good LoRA? This depends on your LoRA's complexity. For example, when I training the spritesheet LoRA, even though I used 100 images, I didn't include buildings in the training data, so this LoRA doesn't work for buildings. So think about your LoRA's use cases and add examples for as many use cases as possible to improve quality. What are paired images and how to train LoRAs for image-editing? When training LoRAs for image editing on fal, we call each edit example paired images - one with _start suffix, one with _end suffix. For example, if you're training a background remove LoRA, the unedited original photo will be your '_start' image. The image with background removed will be the '_end' image. Simply put: images we want to edit or use as reference get _start, target images we want to achieve get '_end'. Important: save both images with the same name. Like image332_start.jpg and image332_end.jpg. This way the system knows which images pair together. What about training LoRAs for models with multiple image inputs? Same logic. We still use _start and _end suffixes, but with one difference. Since there are multiple input images, we can number them: _start, _start1, _start2. Example: start images, 1st image = Woman portrait (image35_start.jpg) 2nd image = Glasses photo (image35_start1.jpg) 3rd image = Hat photo (image35_start2.jpg) Output image = portrait of woman wearing glasses and hat (image35_end.jpg) Can we do more detailed captioning? Yes. Similarly, you can improve training quality by creating a txt file for each set with the caption inside. Example: create image35.txt and write: 'Recreate the image by putting the glasses from the second image and the hat from the third image on the woman in the first image.' What are Steps? How many should I use? What's Learning Rate? Steps determines how many times the model sees and processes your training data (your images). Each step, the model learns a bit more. But as steps increase, so does the risk of overfitting. So there's no real default. But for a simpler LoRA with 20 paired images, 1000 steps is ideal. Here's a metaphor for the Steps and Learning Rate relationship: Imagine you have a balloon. Our goal is to inflate it to the optimal size. Steps = How many times we blow into the balloon Learning rate = How hard we blow each time If we blow too softly, we need to blow many more times. If we blow too hard, we risk popping it quickly and can't reach optimal size. Of course training won't explode, but it won't work as intended because it wasn't trained optimally. Training's done, now what? Once training's complete, you'll have a safetensors file. Every model you train on fal has a LoRA inference endpoint. In that inference, add your safetensors file link to the LoRA url input, and you can use your LoRA. Thanks for the read! The workflow in the video: If I forgot anything, let me know in the replies.

ilker

15,184 views • 6 months ago

🛑🇧🇫- The orphans of Thomas Sankara. When Thomas Sankara took power in 1983, he sent 600 Burkinabè youth between the age of 12-16 to Cuba 🇨🇺 to study either Agriculture, Geology or Medicine among other programs and come back home to consolidate the revolution. He personally told them, “study hard and come back to develop your country.” The boys said they never forgot what he told them, and that they could never forget how he shook the hand of each of them while charging them with that mission. He didn’t choose anyone, but instead he chose the less fortunate. All the children had something in common: they were either from very poor families, or were orphans either of fathers or mothers or both parents. So, Sankara was like their father, a father to all of them. When those kids heard about the cowardly assassination of their father, they were so devastated. They felt like all hope was gone. And do you know the worst part in all of this? The regime of Blaise Compaore guided by France 🇫🇷 cancelled their scholarships, cutting short their dream and abandoning them. Blaise ordered them to be repatriated, but Fidel Castro refused to send them back home. He said that the children should be allowed to complete their education. However, out of the 600 students, only 33 completed university. But the good thing is, all those students learned a manual work with some technical skills in some field or training. To cut the story short, all I can say is that, even those who returned home with their education and skills, Blaise made sure that they could never be employed in the government. Do you see why I hate treason with all my heart and say that the only punishment for it is DEATH? Anyway, Thomas Sankara was a great man and a great visionary leader. However, the other puppet who sold our country to the French and the imperialists, and ruined it for 27 years, and who is still hiding in Côte d’Ivoire 🇨🇮 is a coward and a traitor.

🛑🇧🇫- The orphans of Thomas Sankara. When Thomas Sankara took power in 1983, he sent 600 Burkinabè youth between the age of 12-16 to Cuba 🇨🇺 to study either Agriculture, Geology or Medicine among other programs and come back home to consolidate the revolution. He personally told them, “study hard and come back to develop your country.” The boys said they never forgot what he told them, and that they could never forget how he shook the hand of each of them while charging them with that mission. He didn’t choose anyone, but instead he chose the less fortunate. All the children had something in common: they were either from very poor families, or were orphans either of fathers or mothers or both parents. So, Sankara was like their father, a father to all of them. When those kids heard about the cowardly assassination of their father, they were so devastated. They felt like all hope was gone. And do you know the worst part in all of this? The regime of Blaise Compaore guided by France 🇫🇷 cancelled their scholarships, cutting short their dream and abandoning them. Blaise ordered them to be repatriated, but Fidel Castro refused to send them back home. He said that the children should be allowed to complete their education. However, out of the 600 students, only 33 completed university. But the good thing is, all those students learned a manual work with some technical skills in some field or training. To cut the story short, all I can say is that, even those who returned home with their education and skills, Blaise made sure that they could never be employed in the government. Do you see why I hate treason with all my heart and say that the only punishment for it is DEATH? Anyway, Thomas Sankara was a great man and a great visionary leader. However, the other puppet who sold our country to the French and the imperialists, and ruined it for 27 years, and who is still hiding in Côte d’Ivoire 🇨🇮 is a coward and a traitor.

Sy Marcus Herve Traore

20,043 views • 1 year ago

Israel: A Nation on Edge, A Strategy Without Exit Israel in a Nutshell Leading up to June 12 It’s hard to believe that a country as small as Israel has been able to stir the Middle East upside down for over seventy years—fighting from Lebanon all the way to Iran, then swinging back to bomb any surrounding country right and left at will without any resistance. You might think Israel is crazy, yet its strikes are always sharp and calculated, its operations cold and clean—like those of a virtuoso killer. Israel is the most formidable killer of the Middle East. --- The Begin Doctrine: always no-warning, always first-strike Someone once said: Israel is like that neighbour who drops down through your ceiling at midnight, blows up your rice cooker, and the next morning says, “Sorry, I thought you were hiding a bomb.” The joke is crude, but the metaphor lands. Because its neighbours—Syria, Lebanon, Iran, even Egypt and Jordan—haven't always been pushovers. These are nations with standing armies and weapons to spare. And yet, time and again, in this powder keg of a region, they end up flat on their backs, blinking at the sky. Why? Simple. Israel doesn’t rely on landmass or manpower. It survives by striking hard and speaking little. That’s its edge. To understand Israel’s strength, you need to understand where it comes from. This country wasn’t so much founded as it was fought into existence. In 1948, the moment it declared independence, five neighbouring countries rushed in to crush it. The result? A newborn nation in its crib punched five grown men in the face—and carved out even more land than the UN had given it. That first war shaped its worldview: only fists can guard a homeland. Since then, Israel has lived by one rule—if you look at me the wrong way, I’ll hit first. It doesn’t wait. It doesn’t warn. When Israel hits, first your airstrike goes, then your nuclear site, then your commanders. If you complain, next comes your capital, reduced to rubbles. But this ruthlessness isn’t arbitrary —it’s doctrine. Israel’s entire military strategy is built on two pillars: pre-emption and absolute regional military dominance. That means it never waits for you to be ready. While you’re brushing your teeth in the morning, still fumbling with the toothpaste cap, its missiles are already on the way. This isn’t hyperbole—it’s history. In the Six-Day War of 1967, Israel’s opening airstrike wiped out 90% of Egypt’s air force before they even got off the ground. Arab capitals were left speechless. 🧵

Israel: A Nation on Edge, A Strategy Without Exit Israel in a Nutshell Leading up to June 12 It’s hard to believe that a country as small as Israel has been able to stir the Middle East upside down for over seventy years—fighting from Lebanon all the way to Iran, then swinging back to bomb any surrounding country right and left at will without any resistance. You might think Israel is crazy, yet its strikes are always sharp and calculated, its operations cold and clean—like those of a virtuoso killer. Israel is the most formidable killer of the Middle East. --- The Begin Doctrine: always no-warning, always first-strike Someone once said: Israel is like that neighbour who drops down through your ceiling at midnight, blows up your rice cooker, and the next morning says, “Sorry, I thought you were hiding a bomb.” The joke is crude, but the metaphor lands. Because its neighbours—Syria, Lebanon, Iran, even Egypt and Jordan—haven't always been pushovers. These are nations with standing armies and weapons to spare. And yet, time and again, in this powder keg of a region, they end up flat on their backs, blinking at the sky. Why? Simple. Israel doesn’t rely on landmass or manpower. It survives by striking hard and speaking little. That’s its edge. To understand Israel’s strength, you need to understand where it comes from. This country wasn’t so much founded as it was fought into existence. In 1948, the moment it declared independence, five neighbouring countries rushed in to crush it. The result? A newborn nation in its crib punched five grown men in the face—and carved out even more land than the UN had given it. That first war shaped its worldview: only fists can guard a homeland. Since then, Israel has lived by one rule—if you look at me the wrong way, I’ll hit first. It doesn’t wait. It doesn’t warn. When Israel hits, first your airstrike goes, then your nuclear site, then your commanders. If you complain, next comes your capital, reduced to rubbles. But this ruthlessness isn’t arbitrary —it’s doctrine. Israel’s entire military strategy is built on two pillars: pre-emption and absolute regional military dominance. That means it never waits for you to be ready. While you’re brushing your teeth in the morning, still fumbling with the toothpaste cap, its missiles are already on the way. This isn’t hyperbole—it’s history. In the Six-Day War of 1967, Israel’s opening airstrike wiped out 90% of Egypt’s air force before they even got off the ground. Arab capitals were left speechless. 🧵

America-China Watcher

334,980 views • 1 year ago

I absolutely LOVE this mindset from Vanderbilt Football Head Coach Clark Lea (Clark Lea) he's coined "Head, Body, Head Body." 🥊 Great boxers don't step into the ring trying to KO their opponent with every punch. They trust the accumulation of each shot. Every jab has a purpose. Every body shot is an investment. They know the knockout isn't a single moment, it's the result of hundreds of disciplined decisions that slowly break their opponent's will. 💔 Like the illustration of the rock remaining solid after 100 blows from the hammer, but splitting on the 101st.. Head. Body. Head. Body. It's more than a combination. It's a mindset. 🧠 👣 Stay where your feet are. Don't chase the knockout. Don't get distracted by the crowd, the scorecards, or the emotion of the moment. Whether things are going your way or falling apart around you, don't forecast the outcome. Just execute the next punch. 🥊 The body shots rarely make the highlight reel. They're repetitive. They're often invisible in the box score. But they quietly drain energy, erode resistance, and create openings that weren't there before. There's versions of body shots in every sport or profession. In how you attack your day, your practice and how you attack your opponent. The unglamorous reps. The extra work. The consistent commitment to the details. The daily act of discipline that nobody applauds. The ability to do the little things right again and again and again. Those are the body shots in your life. By themselves they don't seem decisive. But compounded over weeks, months, and years, they become an unstoppable force. ☃️ Similar to a snowball rolling down a hill, except instead of snow it's consistency. Championships aren't won by searching for one knockout punch. They're won by relentlessly sticking to the plan until the accumulation of snow (reps) becomes impossible to overcome. 🏆

I absolutely LOVE this mindset from Vanderbilt Football Head Coach Clark Lea (Clark Lea) he's coined "Head, Body, Head Body." 🥊 Great boxers don't step into the ring trying to KO their opponent with every punch. They trust the accumulation of each shot. Every jab has a purpose. Every body shot is an investment. They know the knockout isn't a single moment, it's the result of hundreds of disciplined decisions that slowly break their opponent's will. 💔 Like the illustration of the rock remaining solid after 100 blows from the hammer, but splitting on the 101st.. Head. Body. Head. Body. It's more than a combination. It's a mindset. 🧠 👣 Stay where your feet are. Don't chase the knockout. Don't get distracted by the crowd, the scorecards, or the emotion of the moment. Whether things are going your way or falling apart around you, don't forecast the outcome. Just execute the next punch. 🥊 The body shots rarely make the highlight reel. They're repetitive. They're often invisible in the box score. But they quietly drain energy, erode resistance, and create openings that weren't there before. There's versions of body shots in every sport or profession. In how you attack your day, your practice and how you attack your opponent. The unglamorous reps. The extra work. The consistent commitment to the details. The daily act of discipline that nobody applauds. The ability to do the little things right again and again and again. Those are the body shots in your life. By themselves they don't seem decisive. But compounded over weeks, months, and years, they become an unstoppable force. ☃️ Similar to a snowball rolling down a hill, except instead of snow it's consistency. Championships aren't won by searching for one knockout punch. They're won by relentlessly sticking to the plan until the accumulation of snow (reps) becomes impossible to overcome. 🏆

Josh Chambers

22,758 views • 1 month ago