正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Meet Gen-1 Slides, Genspark’s first model designed for knowledge work. Trained with Fireworks from an open-weight base, Gen-1 Slides now powers Standard mode in Genspark AI Slides, delivering frontier quality decks at roughly 1/17th of Opus 5’s price. Fewer midnight fixes. Better decks by default. Read the full blog:

66,674 次观看 • 7 天前 •via X (Twitter)

16 条评论

Jordan Zaby 的头像
Jordan Zaby7 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ Because Genspark has always been the best tool for Slides!

Genspark 的头像
Genspark7 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ THank you!

Vivek Chauhan 的头像
Vivek Chauhan7 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ Congratulation ! it has been great collaborating with your team on this

Vivian Clark 的头像
Vivian Clark7 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ Genspark is such an amazing company. Really impressed by what the team has built.

Genspark 的头像
Genspark7 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ Thank you, this means a lot!

Tanvir Anjum 的头像
Tanvir Anjum7 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ Affordable frontier-quality slides could change knowledge work.

Pranay Bhatia 的头像
Pranay Bhatia7 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ Congrats @genspark_ai, amazing to partner with you in training a model that matches frontier quality!

Loukman 的头像
Loukman7 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ building slides with html will never solve this unfortunately

Aina Oluwatobi 的头像
Aina Oluwatobi7 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ Let’s lower the price of models, and still giving us good qualities 🙌🙌

Genspark 的头像
Genspark7 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ More models with great quality and cheaper price are on the way!

Punkesh 的头像
Punkesh7 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ I had been wasting so much time in building front end skills and hacking repos to solve deck slop! Is this open weights too?

Genspark 的头像
Genspark7 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ Let us know what you think! Gen-1 is not open-weight but does come standard with every plan on Genspark

Evelyn 的头像
Evelyn6 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ Gen-1 Slides looks like a powerful step forward for faster, high-quality knowledge work

Genspark 的头像
Genspark6 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ Try it out and let us know what you think!

pedro 的头像
pedro7 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ I have a question: why don't they integrate it into the chat and eliminate the GPT-5 Pro model family—which costs between $168 and $180 at launch—while Astra costs only $50?

Blake Thompson 的头像
Blake Thompson6 天前

@FireworksAI_HQ This is a huge step for AI-powered presentations. Better quality at a fraction of the cost is exactly what knowledge workers need.

相关视频

Chamath is making one of the most important business arguments of 2026. Half of large US companies right now cannot generate returns that exceed their cost of capital, which has normalized back to its long run average of 8 to 11%. Another one in seven companies globally is stuck generating persistent returns between 1 and 5% and most businesses don't have room for error and in this environment walks every frontier AI lab saying the same thing, give us your data, your workflows, your processes and our model will make everything better. And companies by the millions said yes. What they didn't fully account for is what happens on the other side of that door. Every time an employee runs a query through a frontier model API, the prompt goes through external servers, workflows, customer data, pricing logic, internal processes, all of it transmitted through a third party. As Alex Karp said companies are spending on tokens while handing over the exact proprietary advantages that make their business worth owning. Microsoft blocked internal use of Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 but over its 30-day data retention policy and the largest software company in the world decided a frontier model's data handling was too risky for its own employees. A US government action revoked access to another frontier model for foreign nationals overnight. Now here's where the cost math becomes impossible to ignore. Deutsche Bank calculated a roughly 65x cost gap between frontier models like Claude Fable 5 at ~$3.25 per task and open-source alternatives at ~$0.05. For 90% of everyday enterprise tasks, performance is comparable. Open-weight models now match closed frontier systems on core agent tasks at roughly one-tenth the cost, a high-volume deployment that costs $250/day on Claude runs at $12/day on an open-source equivalent. Chamath Palihapitiya tested this directly by running a standard enterprise code migration task through an orchestration layer wrapping an open-source model came in 16.4x cheaper than using a frontier model directly.

Milk Road AI

281,771 次观看 • 2 个月前

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

18,509 次观看 • 15 天前

🎥 Today we’re premiering Meta Movie Gen: the most advanced media foundation models to-date. Developed by AI research teams at Meta, Movie Gen delivers state-of-the-art results across a range of capabilities. We’re excited for the potential of this line of research to usher in entirely new possibilities for casual creators and creative professionals alike. More details and examples of what Movie Gen can do ➡️ 🛠️ Movie Gen models and capabilities Movie Gen Video: 30B parameter transformer model that can generate high-quality and high-definition images and videos from a single text prompt. Movie Gen Audio: A 13B parameter transformer model that can take a video input along with optional text prompts for controllability to generate high-fidelity audio synced to the video. It can generate ambient sound, instrumental background music and foley sound — delivering state-of-the-art results in audio quality, video-to-audio alignment and text-to-audio alignment. Precise video editing: Using a generated or existing video and accompanying text instructions as an input it can perform localized edits such as adding, removing or replacing elements — or global changes like background or style changes. Personalized videos: Using an image of a person and a text prompt, the model can generate a video with state-of-the-art results on character preservation and natural movement in video. We’re continuing to work closely with creative professionals from across the field to integrate their feedback as we work towards a potential release. We look forward to sharing more on this work and the creative possibilities it will enable in the future.

AI at Meta

2,266,493 次观看 • 1 年前