Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

📚 New CA Bill Could Punish Educators for Discussing Israel’s Genocide in Gaza Teacher unions (CTA, CFT, CFA), civil rights groups, and 100+ grassroots orgs are sounding the alarm over AB 715 — a bill passed overnight that gives a governor-appointed “Antisemitism Prevention Coordinator” sweeping power to police classrooms....

DropSiteNews's profile picture

Drop Site

204,091 subscribers

46,228 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessNews & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

When I am Premier, I will: 1. Bring a vote on the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism to the floor of the Legislative Assembly within the first 2 weeks of the next Legislative session – Either as the government or the Official Opposition. 2. Link Funding for BC Universities to Upholding the rights of their Jewish student body and all other religious groups acting peacefully. Require universities to enforce their code of conduct to protect students from bigotry and physical threats. 3. Immediately approve charges against Charlotte Kates and Samidoun as recommended by the Vancouver Police Department. Additionally, instruct the Attorney General to investigate other groups who have been actively partnering with Samidoun. 4. Adjust the mandatory Holocaust Education to be delivered in grade 8 and include an additional mandatory module about the evolution of antisemitism: From medieval to modern. 5. Provide additional funding to Jewish schools, places of worship and institutions to improve security, until the threat level comes down. 6. The creation of a Special Advisor on Jewish Community & Antisemitism. 7. Antisemitism training for law enforcement, politicians and public service employees. 8. Work with the Provincial Firearms Officer to ensure that licensed armed security can be employed to protect Jewish institutions. Together, we will get BC back on track -
1:35

When I am Premier, I will: 1. Bring a vote on the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism to the floor of the Legislative Assembly within the first 2 weeks of the next Legislative session – Either as the government or the Official Opposition. 2. Link Funding for BC Universities to Upholding the rights of their Jewish student body and all other religious groups acting peacefully. Require universities to enforce their code of conduct to protect students from bigotry and physical threats. 3. Immediately approve charges against Charlotte Kates and Samidoun as recommended by the Vancouver Police Department. Additionally, instruct the Attorney General to investigate other groups who have been actively partnering with Samidoun. 4. Adjust the mandatory Holocaust Education to be delivered in grade 8 and include an additional mandatory module about the evolution of antisemitism: From medieval to modern. 5. Provide additional funding to Jewish schools, places of worship and institutions to improve security, until the threat level comes down. 6. The creation of a Special Advisor on Jewish Community & Antisemitism. 7. Antisemitism training for law enforcement, politicians and public service employees. 8. Work with the Provincial Firearms Officer to ensure that licensed armed security can be employed to protect Jewish institutions. Together, we will get BC back on track -

Iain Black

337,706 views • 5 months ago

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.
1:39

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Voice of Rabbis

381,905 views • 1 year ago

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.
1:46

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Voice of Rabbis

38,281 views • 1 year ago

Michigan Democrats are terrified Biden will implode and drag them down. So today they bet the bank and went all out to codify election fraud into state statute with SB 603. Today they smashed through this gigantic pile of election-fraud-enabling legislation today with Democrat only votes. SB603 Repeals current law that gives authority to bipartisan county Boards of Canvassers to investigate fraud and other wrongdoing including ballot tampering during recounts. With the passage of their (election-fraud-enabling) Bill, there will be no future route for requesting a recount if you believe there was fraud. Under their corruption bill, candidates will be prohibited from requesting a recount if they suspect fraud and is designed to stop investigations of election fraud by the Board of Canvassers. This disgusting bill will now permit clerks to recount ballots even if seals are broken on ballot containers and was essentially written by the Secretary of State who was reversed multiple times, by our Supreme Court for her illegal election decisions. The bill changes the standard for a candidate or party to petition for a recount of election results from alleging there has been “mistake or fraud” in the process to now only permitting alleging there has been an “error.” So even if the candidate or Party is absolutely convinced there was fraud, this cannot be alleged or investigated. To boot, this Democrat’s bill makes it tougher to do a recount by doubling the recount petition fees and making it a felony for 'interfering' with a recount without any clear definition of what that means to open up more “LAWFARE.” If passed as is, the language is changed to prohibit a recount, investigation or audit of the conduct of an election when fraud is alleged to only a determination of the number of votes cast for one candidate or another, or a ballot question. Lastly, the bill says a recount could not assess the qualification of the voters participating in an election, or the manner in which ballots are applied for, or issued to voters. Wow isn’t that a doozy. If illegals, or dead people, or those not registered in Mich. are voting, we cannot “assess the qualification of those voters or the manner in which those ballots were applied for and issued to these voters.” Yep, the Democrats have completely thrown off the mask with this terrible bill attempting to win at any cost-our Republic... be damned.
2:01

Michigan Democrats are terrified Biden will implode and drag them down. So today they bet the bank and went all out to codify election fraud into state statute with SB 603. Today they smashed through this gigantic pile of election-fraud-enabling legislation today with Democrat only votes. SB603 Repeals current law that gives authority to bipartisan county Boards of Canvassers to investigate fraud and other wrongdoing including ballot tampering during recounts. With the passage of their (election-fraud-enabling) Bill, there will be no future route for requesting a recount if you believe there was fraud. Under their corruption bill, candidates will be prohibited from requesting a recount if they suspect fraud and is designed to stop investigations of election fraud by the Board of Canvassers. This disgusting bill will now permit clerks to recount ballots even if seals are broken on ballot containers and was essentially written by the Secretary of State who was reversed multiple times, by our Supreme Court for her illegal election decisions. The bill changes the standard for a candidate or party to petition for a recount of election results from alleging there has been “mistake or fraud” in the process to now only permitting alleging there has been an “error.” So even if the candidate or Party is absolutely convinced there was fraud, this cannot be alleged or investigated. To boot, this Democrat’s bill makes it tougher to do a recount by doubling the recount petition fees and making it a felony for 'interfering' with a recount without any clear definition of what that means to open up more “LAWFARE.” If passed as is, the language is changed to prohibit a recount, investigation or audit of the conduct of an election when fraud is alleged to only a determination of the number of votes cast for one candidate or another, or a ballot question. Lastly, the bill says a recount could not assess the qualification of the voters participating in an election, or the manner in which ballots are applied for, or issued to voters. Wow isn’t that a doozy. If illegals, or dead people, or those not registered in Mich. are voting, we cannot “assess the qualification of those voters or the manner in which those ballots were applied for and issued to these voters.” Yep, the Democrats have completely thrown off the mask with this terrible bill attempting to win at any cost-our Republic... be damned.

Jim Runestad

126,341 views • 2 years ago

REPORT: Australia has just introduced what may be the most extreme hate speech law in Western history. The new 2026 “Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill” punishes speech that causes fear—even if no harm occurs—with up to 5 years in prison. It gets worse. The law applies to nearly everything: tweets, blogs, memes, even quoting scripture online. It explicitly states that it doesn’t matter if anyone actually felt hatred or fear. And it allows the government to go back in time and charge people for things they said before the law existed. The bill also gives police power to ban groups without due process—including groups outside Australia—and to imprison citizens for up to 15 years for “supporting” them. And while it claims to offer religious protections, a rep from the Attorney General’s Department confirmed that Catholics and Christians will not receive those protections—even as Jewish, Islamic, and Sikh Australians do. If you post a Bible verse today, what’s stopping them from calling it hate speech tomorrow? Don't miss ZeeeMediaOfficial's report:👇
13:12

REPORT: Australia has just introduced what may be the most extreme hate speech law in Western history. The new 2026 “Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill” punishes speech that causes fear—even if no harm occurs—with up to 5 years in prison. It gets worse. The law applies to nearly everything: tweets, blogs, memes, even quoting scripture online. It explicitly states that it doesn’t matter if anyone actually felt hatred or fear. And it allows the government to go back in time and charge people for things they said before the law existed. The bill also gives police power to ban groups without due process—including groups outside Australia—and to imprison citizens for up to 15 years for “supporting” them. And while it claims to offer religious protections, a rep from the Attorney General’s Department confirmed that Catholics and Christians will not receive those protections—even as Jewish, Islamic, and Sikh Australians do. If you post a Bible verse today, what’s stopping them from calling it hate speech tomorrow? Don't miss ZeeeMediaOfficial's report:👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

617,099 views • 7 months ago

🔥 BREAKING 🔥 The Israel Lobby & Jewish Organisations have pushed the Ohio Government to remove Americans FIRST AMENDMENT & make it illegal to criticise Israel or Jews. Ohio, U.S is proposing 20 YEARS in prison & fines of up to $1 MILLION for Americans who boycott or speak out against the Jews. SB 87 expands Ohio’s ethnic intimidation statute by enhancing criminal penalties based on ‘perceived’ motive tied to race, religion, or national origin, including in contexts involving peaceful protest, political expression, and assembly. SB 87 would also codify the overbroad and widely criticized International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism into Ohio law, raising serious concerns that criticism of a foreign government, specifically Israel and its policies, could be mischaracterized as evidence of discriminatory intent. Civil liberties advocates have repeatedly cautioned that the IHRA definition has been weaponized across the country to suppress lawful speech and activism. If you want to know who rules over you, look at who you can’t criticise.
1:15

🔥 BREAKING 🔥 The Israel Lobby & Jewish Organisations have pushed the Ohio Government to remove Americans FIRST AMENDMENT & make it illegal to criticise Israel or Jews. Ohio, U.S is proposing 20 YEARS in prison & fines of up to $1 MILLION for Americans who boycott or speak out against the Jews. SB 87 expands Ohio’s ethnic intimidation statute by enhancing criminal penalties based on ‘perceived’ motive tied to race, religion, or national origin, including in contexts involving peaceful protest, political expression, and assembly. SB 87 would also codify the overbroad and widely criticized International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism into Ohio law, raising serious concerns that criticism of a foreign government, specifically Israel and its policies, could be mischaracterized as evidence of discriminatory intent. Civil liberties advocates have repeatedly cautioned that the IHRA definition has been weaponized across the country to suppress lawful speech and activism. If you want to know who rules over you, look at who you can’t criticise.

Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏

201,197 views • 6 months ago

The House of Reps has passed second reading of a constitutional amendment bill to remove immunity from the Vice President, the Governors, and their Deputies in order to curb corruption, eradicate impunity, and enhance accountability in public office, along with 41 other bills. The others bill are: A Bill for a Creating Additional Three States Oke - Ogun State, ljebu State and Ife - ljesa State. A Bill for the Creation of "Tiga State" from the Present Kano State with Headquarters in "Rano". A bill to Create a New State in the South Eastern Region of Nigeria Known as Orlu State. A bill to Create an Additional State in the South East Region of Nigeria, Carved from the Existing Five (5) States to be known as Etiti State with Capital at Okigwe. A Bill to Establish and Provide Roles for Traditional Rulers in Nigeria and Provide for the Recognition of the Advisory Role of Traditional Rulers in the Constitution. A bill to Grant Citizenship Rights to Spouses of Women from Nigeria, Specify the Minimum Number of Youths and Women that May be Appointed into Specific Offices. A bill to Guarantee Indigene Status to Persons by Reason of Birth or Continued Residence for a Period of Not Less than Ten Years or by Reason of Marriage. A bill to include Citizenship by Investment as one of the classes of Citizenship in Nigeria, provides for the Acquisition of Nigerian Citizenship by Qualified Foreign Investors who meet Specified Investment Thresholds. A bill to Separate the Offices of the Attorney-General of the Federation, Attorney-General of a State from the Offices of the Minister of Justice of the Federal Government and Commissioner for Justice of the Government of a State. A bill to Provide for the Establishment of the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation and the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federal Government. A bill to Increase the Number of Members of the Federal Civil Service Commission to Provide for each State of the Federation and Federal Capital Territory, Abuja the Opportunity of One Person Representation. A bill to Mandate all Government Statutory Corporations, Commissions, Authorities, Agencies including all Persons and Bodies Established by Law to Submit Yearly Financial Statement to the Auditor General within a Specified Period. A bill to Specify the Period for the Laying of Annual Budget Estimates Before the National and State Houses of Assembly. A bill to Provide for the Public Disclosure of Reports of the Auditor-General of the Federation and for the Auditor-General of a State. And others constitutional amendments.
9:58

The House of Reps has passed second reading of a constitutional amendment bill to remove immunity from the Vice President, the Governors, and their Deputies in order to curb corruption, eradicate impunity, and enhance accountability in public office, along with 41 other bills. The others bill are: A Bill for a Creating Additional Three States Oke - Ogun State, ljebu State and Ife - ljesa State. A Bill for the Creation of "Tiga State" from the Present Kano State with Headquarters in "Rano". A bill to Create a New State in the South Eastern Region of Nigeria Known as Orlu State. A bill to Create an Additional State in the South East Region of Nigeria, Carved from the Existing Five (5) States to be known as Etiti State with Capital at Okigwe. A Bill to Establish and Provide Roles for Traditional Rulers in Nigeria and Provide for the Recognition of the Advisory Role of Traditional Rulers in the Constitution. A bill to Grant Citizenship Rights to Spouses of Women from Nigeria, Specify the Minimum Number of Youths and Women that May be Appointed into Specific Offices. A bill to Guarantee Indigene Status to Persons by Reason of Birth or Continued Residence for a Period of Not Less than Ten Years or by Reason of Marriage. A bill to include Citizenship by Investment as one of the classes of Citizenship in Nigeria, provides for the Acquisition of Nigerian Citizenship by Qualified Foreign Investors who meet Specified Investment Thresholds. A bill to Separate the Offices of the Attorney-General of the Federation, Attorney-General of a State from the Offices of the Minister of Justice of the Federal Government and Commissioner for Justice of the Government of a State. A bill to Provide for the Establishment of the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation and the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federal Government. A bill to Increase the Number of Members of the Federal Civil Service Commission to Provide for each State of the Federation and Federal Capital Territory, Abuja the Opportunity of One Person Representation. A bill to Mandate all Government Statutory Corporations, Commissions, Authorities, Agencies including all Persons and Bodies Established by Law to Submit Yearly Financial Statement to the Auditor General within a Specified Period. A bill to Specify the Period for the Laying of Annual Budget Estimates Before the National and State Houses of Assembly. A bill to Provide for the Public Disclosure of Reports of the Auditor-General of the Federation and for the Auditor-General of a State. And others constitutional amendments.

Imran Muhammad

116,014 views • 1 year ago

HOLY CR*P 🚨 The day Charlie Kirk was killed and everyone was focused on that, Gavin Newsom and California Democrats rammed through an online censorship bill PENALTIES - If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000. - For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million “SB 771, passing the Assembly on September 10th, 10 days ago. Then on September 16th, passing the Senate completely under our noses, which means right now, all that stands between complete statewide government censorship is Gavin Newsom's signature” “I exaggerating about how bad this bill is? No, I am not. Here is the actual bill. You can pull this up yourself on the state's website. The Bill's called SB 771. It's called Personal Rights Liability, Social Media Platforms. In Section 2, Title 23 of the Bill, it defines the penalties for breaking this new California law - If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state, the State of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000 - For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million. That is the definition of the state controlling speech, folks. — What type of speech is California trying to police here? Well, let's read from the Bill. It says, "This bill protects against online harassment, particularly when directed at historically marginalized groups." “the State of California's actively passing UK style laws that will fine you for saying the wrong thing. Pretty wild. And this bill is completely done, folks. It's passed in the House, it's passed in the Senate. All that's left is Gavin Newsom signing it into law” This is all 100% true, he even clipped screenshots from the bill and put it into the video as proof
2:12

HOLY CR*P 🚨 The day Charlie Kirk was killed and everyone was focused on that, Gavin Newsom and California Democrats rammed through an online censorship bill PENALTIES - If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000. - For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million “SB 771, passing the Assembly on September 10th, 10 days ago. Then on September 16th, passing the Senate completely under our noses, which means right now, all that stands between complete statewide government censorship is Gavin Newsom's signature” “I exaggerating about how bad this bill is? No, I am not. Here is the actual bill. You can pull this up yourself on the state's website. The Bill's called SB 771. It's called Personal Rights Liability, Social Media Platforms. In Section 2, Title 23 of the Bill, it defines the penalties for breaking this new California law - If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state, the State of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000 - For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million. That is the definition of the state controlling speech, folks. — What type of speech is California trying to police here? Well, let's read from the Bill. It says, "This bill protects against online harassment, particularly when directed at historically marginalized groups." “the State of California's actively passing UK style laws that will fine you for saying the wrong thing. Pretty wild. And this bill is completely done, folks. It's passed in the House, it's passed in the Senate. All that's left is Gavin Newsom signing it into law” This is all 100% true, he even clipped screenshots from the bill and put it into the video as proof

Wall Street Apes

3,341,351 views • 11 months ago

The NHS should not adopt the IHRA definition of antisemitism. It is a document that has 1. No legal standing. 2. Deliberately conflates Zionism (a racist, supremacist and openly genocidal ideology) with Judaism. 3. Deliberstely seeks to indemnify Israel from criticism (a state that is guilty of occupation, apartheid, ethnic cleanising and genocide - according to the International Court of Justice, the highest legal body of the united nations) under cover of defining any criticism, or comparison of Israel’s crimes with those of other fascist states as “racist”. 4. By extension, this illegal and illegitimate definition (adopted unilaterally by Theresa May in 2018, without any reference to the wider British public) seeks to protect Israel’s backers - notably the Tory, Labour and Liberal parties, among others, from being exposed to criticism and legal action for their own complicity in genocide in Palestine. 5. In this way Wes Streeting is seeking to use ‘Lord’ Mann (another rabid zionist) and his own position as health secretary to outlaw opposition to his own crimes, “chill” freedom of speech and suppress opposition to British-Israeli Genocide. It is an immoral, racist, anti-democratic initiative, made more immoral by his own long history of political support and promotion, as well as direct funding from the genocide-supporting Israel lobby. Don’t accept it. Action must be taken against Streeting, Starmer, Lammy, Reeves and all those guilty of and complicit in Genocide.
0:23

The NHS should not adopt the IHRA definition of antisemitism. It is a document that has 1. No legal standing. 2. Deliberately conflates Zionism (a racist, supremacist and openly genocidal ideology) with Judaism. 3. Deliberstely seeks to indemnify Israel from criticism (a state that is guilty of occupation, apartheid, ethnic cleanising and genocide - according to the International Court of Justice, the highest legal body of the united nations) under cover of defining any criticism, or comparison of Israel’s crimes with those of other fascist states as “racist”. 4. By extension, this illegal and illegitimate definition (adopted unilaterally by Theresa May in 2018, without any reference to the wider British public) seeks to protect Israel’s backers - notably the Tory, Labour and Liberal parties, among others, from being exposed to criticism and legal action for their own complicity in genocide in Palestine. 5. In this way Wes Streeting is seeking to use ‘Lord’ Mann (another rabid zionist) and his own position as health secretary to outlaw opposition to his own crimes, “chill” freedom of speech and suppress opposition to British-Israeli Genocide. It is an immoral, racist, anti-democratic initiative, made more immoral by his own long history of political support and promotion, as well as direct funding from the genocide-supporting Israel lobby. Don’t accept it. Action must be taken against Streeting, Starmer, Lammy, Reeves and all those guilty of and complicit in Genocide.

The Communists

21,255 views • 10 months ago

The IHRA definition of antisemitism was 'declared adopted' by Wes Streeting, UK Health and Social Care Minister in November 2025. Right to Protest Ltd. has launched a judicial review to stop this measure, and defend the ability of all who support Palestine, and opposed genocide to speak freely. Please donate to the legal fund: The IHRA 'working definition' was NOT designed to be a tool to fight racism. Just the reverse. It is a tool to make ILLEGAL the criticism the Zionism is racism which is a fundamental truth of our age. The definition was created and popularised by the Zionist regime itself and is manifestly an instrument of "Israeli" foreign policy wielded to allow the genocide to continue. Wes Streeting has collaborated directly with the Zionists for many years even taking part in events in the colony that sought to draw up the what became the IHRA working definition. 1.4 million NHS workers will be subject to its political censorship and repression. The target will be all pro-Palestinian British workers (60-70% of British workers are in sympathy with Palestine, despite the years of incessantly hostile media), and particularly Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims. Therefore the IHRA definition, is in fact a RACIST tool of repression, which is already being used to attack pro-Palestine activists, and facilitate the Zionist attacks on progressive, pro-Palestine, anti-genocide British workers.
5:26

The IHRA definition of antisemitism was 'declared adopted' by Wes Streeting, UK Health and Social Care Minister in November 2025. Right to Protest Ltd. has launched a judicial review to stop this measure, and defend the ability of all who support Palestine, and opposed genocide to speak freely. Please donate to the legal fund: The IHRA 'working definition' was NOT designed to be a tool to fight racism. Just the reverse. It is a tool to make ILLEGAL the criticism the Zionism is racism which is a fundamental truth of our age. The definition was created and popularised by the Zionist regime itself and is manifestly an instrument of "Israeli" foreign policy wielded to allow the genocide to continue. Wes Streeting has collaborated directly with the Zionists for many years even taking part in events in the colony that sought to draw up the what became the IHRA working definition. 1.4 million NHS workers will be subject to its political censorship and repression. The target will be all pro-Palestinian British workers (60-70% of British workers are in sympathy with Palestine, despite the years of incessantly hostile media), and particularly Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims. Therefore the IHRA definition, is in fact a RACIST tool of repression, which is already being used to attack pro-Palestine activists, and facilitate the Zionist attacks on progressive, pro-Palestine, anti-genocide British workers.

David Miller

18,848 views • 7 months ago

“Once hate speech is recognized in law, government decides what counts as hate. And that definition shifts with whoever holds power. These laws are easily turned against dissenting voices, including women who speak plainly about sex.” Kara Dansky testifies against AB 1803, a CA Legislative Jewish Caucus priority bill authored by Assemblymember Josh Lowenthal. When justifying the need for this bill, Asm. Lowenthal talks about the very real problem of antisemitism. But suppressing or chilling people’s speech will not change anyone’s mind. People will not become less antisemitic because the government forces their mouths closed. We have data that tells us this. In fact, it can radicalize people more. In 1977, neo-Nazis announced they would march through Skokie, Illinois, a town home to thousands of Holocaust survivors. The town tried to stop them. The ACLU took the Nazis’ case. The lawyer who argued it was a Jewish man named David Goldberger. That is the America I believe in. The America that allows even the worst ideas to be spoken aloud, because the answer to bad speech is more speech, never less. The America that understands the difference between liberty and state control. The America that refuses to hand government the power to decide which views may be spoken and which must be punished. Both my grandfathers crossed an ocean to fight fascism. They came home to a country deeply imperfect, but committed at its core to freedom. They did not storm beaches and bleed in foreign fields so that, three generations later, their grandchildren would sit silent while the state chipped away at our rights. AB 1803 now heads to the CA Senate Judiciary Committee, and Women Are Real will be there to fight it every step of the way. The First Amendment does not defend itself. It survives only because, in every generation, people refuse to nod along.
1:53

“Once hate speech is recognized in law, government decides what counts as hate. And that definition shifts with whoever holds power. These laws are easily turned against dissenting voices, including women who speak plainly about sex.” Kara Dansky testifies against AB 1803, a CA Legislative Jewish Caucus priority bill authored by Assemblymember Josh Lowenthal. When justifying the need for this bill, Asm. Lowenthal talks about the very real problem of antisemitism. But suppressing or chilling people’s speech will not change anyone’s mind. People will not become less antisemitic because the government forces their mouths closed. We have data that tells us this. In fact, it can radicalize people more. In 1977, neo-Nazis announced they would march through Skokie, Illinois, a town home to thousands of Holocaust survivors. The town tried to stop them. The ACLU took the Nazis’ case. The lawyer who argued it was a Jewish man named David Goldberger. That is the America I believe in. The America that allows even the worst ideas to be spoken aloud, because the answer to bad speech is more speech, never less. The America that understands the difference between liberty and state control. The America that refuses to hand government the power to decide which views may be spoken and which must be punished. Both my grandfathers crossed an ocean to fight fascism. They came home to a country deeply imperfect, but committed at its core to freedom. They did not storm beaches and bleed in foreign fields so that, three generations later, their grandchildren would sit silent while the state chipped away at our rights. AB 1803 now heads to the CA Senate Judiciary Committee, and Women Are Real will be there to fight it every step of the way. The First Amendment does not defend itself. It survives only because, in every generation, people refuse to nod along.

WomenAreReal

21,216 views • 2 months ago

I called on city commissioners in Coral Springs, FL, last week to adopt the International Holocaust Rememberance Alliance definition of antisemitism—the best tool we have for identifying anti-Jewish bigotry. We are living in the era of antizionist racism, and if Jews don’t stand up, speak out, and fight the libel-machine that has demonized us 24/7 since October 7, we are going to lose the ability to live freely as Jews in the Diaspora. The bigotry we face is a highly accelerated variety of antizionist Jew-hatred, the rapid spread of which historians have not previously seen. That’s why calling on our elected officials to pass the IHRA definition is so important. Already adopted by more than 40 countries and 38 U.S. states, IHRA provides examples of contemporary antisemitism, including instances of antizionist bigotry that include denying the Jewish people the right to self-determination, comparing Israel to the Nazis, and falsely labeling Israel as inherently racist—rhetoric frequently deployed by groups participating in the antizionist hate movement, which opposes IHRA. The definition explicitly protects First Amendment rights and does not prohibit non-bigoted criticism of Israel, but instead provides a framework for identifying racist and dehumanizing rhetoric that has historically led to violence against Jews. Prior to the October 7 atrocities in Israel, IHRA laws were broadly supported by Democrats and considered non-controversial. But since the massacre, antizionist ideology has entered the mainstream of Democratic politics, with many Democratic politicians seeking to appease the most energized part of the party’s base—antizionists in favor of destroying Israel as a Jewish state—by opposing IHRA. I will be speaking to as many local governments as I can in FL and Missouri in the months ahead to call on them to adopt IHRA. Please join me in this fight to protect our people, our allies, and future generations by speaking to your own elected representatives about IHRA. #jewish #ihra #florida
3:40

I called on city commissioners in Coral Springs, FL, last week to adopt the International Holocaust Rememberance Alliance definition of antisemitism—the best tool we have for identifying anti-Jewish bigotry. We are living in the era of antizionist racism, and if Jews don’t stand up, speak out, and fight the libel-machine that has demonized us 24/7 since October 7, we are going to lose the ability to live freely as Jews in the Diaspora. The bigotry we face is a highly accelerated variety of antizionist Jew-hatred, the rapid spread of which historians have not previously seen. That’s why calling on our elected officials to pass the IHRA definition is so important. Already adopted by more than 40 countries and 38 U.S. states, IHRA provides examples of contemporary antisemitism, including instances of antizionist bigotry that include denying the Jewish people the right to self-determination, comparing Israel to the Nazis, and falsely labeling Israel as inherently racist—rhetoric frequently deployed by groups participating in the antizionist hate movement, which opposes IHRA. The definition explicitly protects First Amendment rights and does not prohibit non-bigoted criticism of Israel, but instead provides a framework for identifying racist and dehumanizing rhetoric that has historically led to violence against Jews. Prior to the October 7 atrocities in Israel, IHRA laws were broadly supported by Democrats and considered non-controversial. But since the massacre, antizionist ideology has entered the mainstream of Democratic politics, with many Democratic politicians seeking to appease the most energized part of the party’s base—antizionists in favor of destroying Israel as a Jewish state—by opposing IHRA. I will be speaking to as many local governments as I can in FL and Missouri in the months ahead to call on them to adopt IHRA. Please join me in this fight to protect our people, our allies, and future generations by speaking to your own elected representatives about IHRA. #jewish #ihra #florida

Kevin Deutsch

37,597 views • 4 months ago

Even Tucker Carlson is raising awareness that California is ending Free Speech with passed legislation Elon Musk needs to be aware of this “The state of California — has passed a law in the state legislature, both chambers of the state legislature, it awaits a signature from Gavin Newsom, that would ban hate speech on the internet in California. Hate speech. Now, how do they define hate speech? I actually have the definition. I actually wrote it down because I was so shocked by it that this is happening. The state of California, if Gavin Newsom signs this law, and he has until October 13th to do it, he, people will be fined if the censors determine that speech constitutes, and we're quoting now, "Violence, intimidation, or coercion..." What's intimidation or coercion — coercion based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, immigration status, or other protected characteristics. Obviously, white Christian men are not covered under that - The state of California under Gavin Newsom is about to, we think, censor the opinions of Americans. Not to protect anybody, but to shield themselves from criticism so they can continue to do what they want to do in secret.” This new law will impose millions and millions of dollars in fines forcing social media companies to censor what California Democrats define as hate speech
2:17

Even Tucker Carlson is raising awareness that California is ending Free Speech with passed legislation Elon Musk needs to be aware of this “The state of California — has passed a law in the state legislature, both chambers of the state legislature, it awaits a signature from Gavin Newsom, that would ban hate speech on the internet in California. Hate speech. Now, how do they define hate speech? I actually have the definition. I actually wrote it down because I was so shocked by it that this is happening. The state of California, if Gavin Newsom signs this law, and he has until October 13th to do it, he, people will be fined if the censors determine that speech constitutes, and we're quoting now, "Violence, intimidation, or coercion..." What's intimidation or coercion — coercion based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, immigration status, or other protected characteristics. Obviously, white Christian men are not covered under that - The state of California under Gavin Newsom is about to, we think, censor the opinions of Americans. Not to protect anybody, but to shield themselves from criticism so they can continue to do what they want to do in secret.” This new law will impose millions and millions of dollars in fines forcing social media companies to censor what California Democrats define as hate speech

Wall Street Apes

867,001 views • 11 months ago

ADL’s latest “antisemitism incidents” report counts large numbers of political expressions opposing Israel’s genocide in Gaza, Zionism, or U.S. support for Israel as “antisemitic” acts, despite ADL claims that criticism of Israel alone is not counted as antisemitic. Breaking Points spoke to Glenn Greenwald about some of the incidents included in the report, which include: ▪️ “An Israeli flag was moved from a locker and a potentially anti-semitic flag was placed across from it at Syracuse University.” ▪️ “At an anti-Israel rally organized by groups including PAL Awda, Indivisible and the Party for Socialism and Liberation, protesters displayed messages including ‘Zionist F off.’” ▪️ “An individual wearing a Palestinian flag harassed people participating in a pro-Israel march saying, ‘Free America from the chains of Isra-Hell. Free America. You are propaganda.’” ▪️ “Students for Justice in Palestine at Brooklyn College posted a message on Instagram attacking Hillel, writing: ‘Hillel is not a student group as it claims, but an active participant in genocide.’ The post also targeted two Jewish students by name who had served and volunteered with the IDF.” Krystal Ball | Saagar Enjeti | Glenn Greenwald
6:18

ADL’s latest “antisemitism incidents” report counts large numbers of political expressions opposing Israel’s genocide in Gaza, Zionism, or U.S. support for Israel as “antisemitic” acts, despite ADL claims that criticism of Israel alone is not counted as antisemitic. Breaking Points spoke to Glenn Greenwald about some of the incidents included in the report, which include: ▪️ “An Israeli flag was moved from a locker and a potentially anti-semitic flag was placed across from it at Syracuse University.” ▪️ “At an anti-Israel rally organized by groups including PAL Awda, Indivisible and the Party for Socialism and Liberation, protesters displayed messages including ‘Zionist F off.’” ▪️ “An individual wearing a Palestinian flag harassed people participating in a pro-Israel march saying, ‘Free America from the chains of Isra-Hell. Free America. You are propaganda.’” ▪️ “Students for Justice in Palestine at Brooklyn College posted a message on Instagram attacking Hillel, writing: ‘Hillel is not a student group as it claims, but an active participant in genocide.’ The post also targeted two Jewish students by name who had served and volunteered with the IDF.” Krystal Ball | Saagar Enjeti | Glenn Greenwald

Drop Site

62,086 views • 3 months ago

Left: Rachel Reeves: “I am a Zionist” at Labour Friends of Israel annual lunch. Right: Israel announces $843 million in new West Bank settlements and #C4News report that Israel is blocking a 3 month supply of 150 trucks of aid to Gaza Labour may not have an antisemitism problem, but it does have a blind spot when it comes to holding Israel accountable for international law and humanitarian issues - Ignoring illegal settlements, the destruction in Gaza, and the prevention of aid is a real political problem Antisemitism and Islamophobia are both horrific and must be challenged. Our society thrives when people of all faiths support each other and stand against abuse; that includes protecting our British Jewish and Muslim populations from harm However, whether a one-state or two-state solution leads to lasting peace, it is difficult to see it being achieved under a Labour government that consistently whitewashes Israel’s actions in Gaza while their friends in Israel restrict humanitarian aid Peace in the Middle East requires courage, accountability, and compromise from all parties. It means halting illegal settlement expansion, allowing humanitarian aid to reach civilians, and supporting a political process that respects the rights of both Palestinians and Israelis So many Labour MPs are members of Labour Friends of Israel, but far fewer join Labour Friends of Palestine. If they can’t be bothered to stand publicly for both Palestinian and Israeli lives, how can they expect to set an example of fairness, humanity, and equal concern? True leadership means defending the rights and safety of all civilians, not just those on one side That's Labour's problem today
0:57

Left: Rachel Reeves: “I am a Zionist” at Labour Friends of Israel annual lunch. Right: Israel announces $843 million in new West Bank settlements and #C4News report that Israel is blocking a 3 month supply of 150 trucks of aid to Gaza Labour may not have an antisemitism problem, but it does have a blind spot when it comes to holding Israel accountable for international law and humanitarian issues - Ignoring illegal settlements, the destruction in Gaza, and the prevention of aid is a real political problem Antisemitism and Islamophobia are both horrific and must be challenged. Our society thrives when people of all faiths support each other and stand against abuse; that includes protecting our British Jewish and Muslim populations from harm However, whether a one-state or two-state solution leads to lasting peace, it is difficult to see it being achieved under a Labour government that consistently whitewashes Israel’s actions in Gaza while their friends in Israel restrict humanitarian aid Peace in the Middle East requires courage, accountability, and compromise from all parties. It means halting illegal settlement expansion, allowing humanitarian aid to reach civilians, and supporting a political process that respects the rights of both Palestinians and Israelis So many Labour MPs are members of Labour Friends of Israel, but far fewer join Labour Friends of Palestine. If they can’t be bothered to stand publicly for both Palestinian and Israeli lives, how can they expect to set an example of fairness, humanity, and equal concern? True leadership means defending the rights and safety of all civilians, not just those on one side That's Labour's problem today

Farrukh

21,323 views • 8 months ago

To the many of you who are students, staff, and alumni of Australian universities, we need your help! You may have heard that Universities Australia recently endorsed a dangerous and politicised definition of antisemitism. The Jewish Council opposes the definition because it threatens academic freedom, will have a chilling effect on legitimate criticism of Israel, and risks institutionalising anti-Palestinian racism. Some universities are now in the process of adopting or considering adopting the definition — but if we act together in this crucial window, we can turn this definition into a dead letter that is never implemented. Help us push back today by writing — as a student, staff member, or alumni — to your university, making clear your opposition to the definition and your concerns about its adoption. You can adapt your letter from the templates on our website ( Let’s make it clear that universities should be places where difficult conversations can happen without fear of censorship or reprisal, where Israel (or any other state) is not shielded from criticism, and where injustice, at home and abroad, is called out.
0:35

To the many of you who are students, staff, and alumni of Australian universities, we need your help! You may have heard that Universities Australia recently endorsed a dangerous and politicised definition of antisemitism. The Jewish Council opposes the definition because it threatens academic freedom, will have a chilling effect on legitimate criticism of Israel, and risks institutionalising anti-Palestinian racism. Some universities are now in the process of adopting or considering adopting the definition — but if we act together in this crucial window, we can turn this definition into a dead letter that is never implemented. Help us push back today by writing — as a student, staff member, or alumni — to your university, making clear your opposition to the definition and your concerns about its adoption. You can adapt your letter from the templates on our website ( Let’s make it clear that universities should be places where difficult conversations can happen without fear of censorship or reprisal, where Israel (or any other state) is not shielded from criticism, and where injustice, at home and abroad, is called out.

Jewish Council of Australia

12,448 views • 1 year ago