Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

New: Joe Rogan is visibly concerned when longevity scientist David Sinclair reveals that the first potential human age-reversal technology is already being tested in humans: ROGAN: “This sounds like the beginning of a horror movie.” SINCLAIR: “I admit it is science fiction, and I even have to pinch myself...

JoeRoganRecaps's profile picture

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

46,969 subscribers

26,737 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨David Sinclair: “The first potential human age-reversal technology is in people right now.” ROGAN: “What is the current state of science as applied to longevity treatments?” SINCLAIR: “We have a human clinical trial.” ROGAN: “If people get old and we understand the mechanism, why couldn’t we reverse it?” SINCLAIR: “My colleagues and I found that aging has a root cause that’s the same in pretty much every cell in the body, and that we could control that.” “In 2020, we had a big publication that showed we could actually safely, for the first time, reverse that process, like reinstalling software in the cell to make it work again.” ---- The treatment is ER-100, an experimental epigenetic reprogramming gene therapy being developed by Life Biosciences, a company co-founded by Harvard geneticist Dr. David Sinclair. In the current FDA clinical trial, the therapy is delivered by injection into the eye. If this works in humans, it could be a major step toward actually reversing aspects of biological aging rather than simply slowing them down. Joe Rogan David Sinclair
3:56

🚨David Sinclair: “The first potential human age-reversal technology is in people right now.” ROGAN: “What is the current state of science as applied to longevity treatments?” SINCLAIR: “We have a human clinical trial.” ROGAN: “If people get old and we understand the mechanism, why couldn’t we reverse it?” SINCLAIR: “My colleagues and I found that aging has a root cause that’s the same in pretty much every cell in the body, and that we could control that.” “In 2020, we had a big publication that showed we could actually safely, for the first time, reverse that process, like reinstalling software in the cell to make it work again.” ---- The treatment is ER-100, an experimental epigenetic reprogramming gene therapy being developed by Life Biosciences, a company co-founded by Harvard geneticist Dr. David Sinclair. In the current FDA clinical trial, the therapy is delivered by injection into the eye. If this works in humans, it could be a major step toward actually reversing aspects of biological aging rather than simply slowing them down. Joe Rogan David Sinclair

KanekoaTheGreat

1,213,393 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Joe Rogan asks Harvard scientist David Sinclair if someone could "inject something in your coffee" to age you decades overnight. His answer: "We know how to do that." SINCLAIR: "We found that that happens largely due to DNA damage... We could use this to rapidly age a mouse, which we published in 2023." ROGAN: "Oh, so like some nefarious state actor, like some Russian spy, could inject something in your coffee, and you would turn 99 overnight." SINCLAIR: "We know how to do that." ROGAN: "Whoa!" SINCLAIR: "Yeah." ROGAN: "That's the dark side of this. You could. You could spike your husband's drink. 'F*ck that dude!' And turn him into an old man. 'What did you do?!'"
0:40

Joe Rogan asks Harvard scientist David Sinclair if someone could "inject something in your coffee" to age you decades overnight. His answer: "We know how to do that." SINCLAIR: "We found that that happens largely due to DNA damage... We could use this to rapidly age a mouse, which we published in 2023." ROGAN: "Oh, so like some nefarious state actor, like some Russian spy, could inject something in your coffee, and you would turn 99 overnight." SINCLAIR: "We know how to do that." ROGAN: "Whoa!" SINCLAIR: "Yeah." ROGAN: "That's the dark side of this. You could. You could spike your husband's drink. 'F*ck that dude!' And turn him into an old man. 'What did you do?!'"

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

328,481 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan almost has a panic attack when longevity scientist David Sinclair exposes that GLP-1 drugs are making people go blind: ROGAN: “We just started taking these. What the f*ck are you saying?” SINCLAIR: “Yeah, it’s not risk-free.” ROGAN: “So what exactly happens to your vision?” SINCLAIR: “It’s called NAION. It’s basically like a stroke in your eye.” “Then your other eye can go, which is pretty scary and there’s nothing you can do about it.” ROGAN: “Holy sh*t.” SINCLAIR: “Sudden blindness has doubled seemingly because of these meds.” ROGAN: “That’s terrible because there’s so many people out there telling everyone they should get on GLP-1s.” SINCLAIR: “Companies don’t want to talk about ths.”
4:55

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan almost has a panic attack when longevity scientist David Sinclair exposes that GLP-1 drugs are making people go blind: ROGAN: “We just started taking these. What the f*ck are you saying?” SINCLAIR: “Yeah, it’s not risk-free.” ROGAN: “So what exactly happens to your vision?” SINCLAIR: “It’s called NAION. It’s basically like a stroke in your eye.” “Then your other eye can go, which is pretty scary and there’s nothing you can do about it.” ROGAN: “Holy sh*t.” SINCLAIR: “Sudden blindness has doubled seemingly because of these meds.” ROGAN: “That’s terrible because there’s so many people out there telling everyone they should get on GLP-1s.” SINCLAIR: “Companies don’t want to talk about ths.”

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

179,011 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Joe Rogan has his mind blown when anti-aging genius David Sinclair says his lab has a top secret drink that successfully makes old mice stronger and smarter in just 4 weeks: SINCLAIR: “The drink has three components in its formula which are top secret.” ROGAN: “You can’t tell us what’s in the drink?” SINCLAIR: “My lab is sworn to secrecy.” ROGAN: “So how are the mice responding to the drink?” SINCLAIR: “The mice get younger.” “Within those four weeks, they get better physically, mentally.” “In normal old mice we see them fitter, stronger, and they’ve shown better memory.” ROGAN: “How long did it take for them to get these results?” SINCLAIR: “They run around the cage in a month’s time. It worked in just four weeks.” ROGAN: “That’s amazing.” SINCLAIR: “Imagine a world where if I’m successful, you can put a cream on your face and you literally get younger.”
6:19

Joe Rogan has his mind blown when anti-aging genius David Sinclair says his lab has a top secret drink that successfully makes old mice stronger and smarter in just 4 weeks: SINCLAIR: “The drink has three components in its formula which are top secret.” ROGAN: “You can’t tell us what’s in the drink?” SINCLAIR: “My lab is sworn to secrecy.” ROGAN: “So how are the mice responding to the drink?” SINCLAIR: “The mice get younger.” “Within those four weeks, they get better physically, mentally.” “In normal old mice we see them fitter, stronger, and they’ve shown better memory.” ROGAN: “How long did it take for them to get these results?” SINCLAIR: “They run around the cage in a month’s time. It worked in just four weeks.” ROGAN: “That’s amazing.” SINCLAIR: “Imagine a world where if I’m successful, you can put a cream on your face and you literally get younger.”

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

24,517 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Joe Rogan yells "Holy sh*t!" after Harvard professor of genetics David Sinclair says sudden blindness has DOUBLED because of GLP-1 drugs. Then Rogan pulls up the data himself — and what he reads out loud is even worse. SINCLAIR: "Glaucoma and also sudden blindness. It's called NAION, which is now twice as more prevalent because of the GLP-1 drugs." ROGAN: "Really?!" SINCLAIR: "It's not well known. Obviously companies don't want to talk about it. But yes, sudden blindness has doubled, seemingly because of these meds." ROGAN: "Holy shit!" SINCLAIR: "Careful." ROGAN: "Sudden blindness has doubled because of GLP-1s?" SINCLAIR: "Due to NAION, which is like a stroke in your eye, and then your other eye can go. Which is pretty scary. And there's nothing you can do about it. Hopefully our drug does work for those people." ROGAN: "And, obviously correlation does not equal causation, but it seems to be." SINCLAIR: "Yeah, there's a scientist at Harvard. You could look up his work. Joe Rizzo. It looks like it's repeatable across the planet." ROGAN: "Wow, that's terrible. Terrible because there's so many people out there that are just telling everyone they should get on GLP-1s… Like online podcasters saying, 'Everyone should get on GLP-1s… It's going to transform society.' I'm like, 'We just started taking these! The f*ck are you saying?!'" SINCLAIR: "Yeah, it's not risk free. Same with ED drugs." ROGAN: "Here goes. Recent studies suggest that a potential risk — rare link between GLP-1 receptor agonist medications such as Ozempic, Wegovy, blah, blah, blah, and… an eye stroke [that] can cause sudden, painless loss of vision in one eye, while absolute risk remains very low." ROGAN: "Well, very low is like… What does that mean?" SINCLAIR: "One in 10,000 people." ROGAN: "One in 10,000?" SINCLAIR: "Oh no. Total of 10,000." ROGAN: "Oh, total of 10,000 so far? How many people are taking this stuff?" [Rogan continues reading] "The drugs were 68.6 times more likely to develop this [eye stroke] and 8 times more likely to develop… diabetic retinopathy." ROGAN: "Oh, my God. Then… Wow." ROGAN: "Yeah, man. These things are just — they're just rolling out…"
2:21

Joe Rogan yells "Holy sh*t!" after Harvard professor of genetics David Sinclair says sudden blindness has DOUBLED because of GLP-1 drugs. Then Rogan pulls up the data himself — and what he reads out loud is even worse. SINCLAIR: "Glaucoma and also sudden blindness. It's called NAION, which is now twice as more prevalent because of the GLP-1 drugs." ROGAN: "Really?!" SINCLAIR: "It's not well known. Obviously companies don't want to talk about it. But yes, sudden blindness has doubled, seemingly because of these meds." ROGAN: "Holy shit!" SINCLAIR: "Careful." ROGAN: "Sudden blindness has doubled because of GLP-1s?" SINCLAIR: "Due to NAION, which is like a stroke in your eye, and then your other eye can go. Which is pretty scary. And there's nothing you can do about it. Hopefully our drug does work for those people." ROGAN: "And, obviously correlation does not equal causation, but it seems to be." SINCLAIR: "Yeah, there's a scientist at Harvard. You could look up his work. Joe Rizzo. It looks like it's repeatable across the planet." ROGAN: "Wow, that's terrible. Terrible because there's so many people out there that are just telling everyone they should get on GLP-1s… Like online podcasters saying, 'Everyone should get on GLP-1s… It's going to transform society.' I'm like, 'We just started taking these! The f*ck are you saying?!'" SINCLAIR: "Yeah, it's not risk free. Same with ED drugs." ROGAN: "Here goes. Recent studies suggest that a potential risk — rare link between GLP-1 receptor agonist medications such as Ozempic, Wegovy, blah, blah, blah, and… an eye stroke [that] can cause sudden, painless loss of vision in one eye, while absolute risk remains very low." ROGAN: "Well, very low is like… What does that mean?" SINCLAIR: "One in 10,000 people." ROGAN: "One in 10,000?" SINCLAIR: "Oh no. Total of 10,000." ROGAN: "Oh, total of 10,000 so far? How many people are taking this stuff?" [Rogan continues reading] "The drugs were 68.6 times more likely to develop this [eye stroke] and 8 times more likely to develop… diabetic retinopathy." ROGAN: "Oh, my God. Then… Wow." ROGAN: "Yeah, man. These things are just — they're just rolling out…"

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,484,092 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

A foreign government attempted to invest over $100 million into one of David Sinclair's age-reversal companies. The US government BLOCKED it. The reason? They classified the technology as too dangerous to fall into foreign hands. Sinclair sits on the board of the company. He confirmed the investment was killed because the US government believed a foreign power would gain too much access to age-reversal research. When asked if it was China, his response: "I won't say more. It's sensitive." But here's what he DID say: Governments around the world are watching this technology closely. Not just for healthcare. The US government has identified what Sinclair calls "so-called super soldier potential" in age-reversal tech. He also said the winner of this race won't just gain economic advantage. There will be "potential for radical change in the pharmaceutical industry, in healthcare" and dramatic social change. Sinclair believes the technology is very powerful and that society should start preparing now. Because as he put it: "It's not an if. It's a when." David Sinclair is at SynBioBeta this year - discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. Link for tickets below. — David Sinclair
1:45

A foreign government attempted to invest over $100 million into one of David Sinclair's age-reversal companies. The US government BLOCKED it. The reason? They classified the technology as too dangerous to fall into foreign hands. Sinclair sits on the board of the company. He confirmed the investment was killed because the US government believed a foreign power would gain too much access to age-reversal research. When asked if it was China, his response: "I won't say more. It's sensitive." But here's what he DID say: Governments around the world are watching this technology closely. Not just for healthcare. The US government has identified what Sinclair calls "so-called super soldier potential" in age-reversal tech. He also said the winner of this race won't just gain economic advantage. There will be "potential for radical change in the pharmaceutical industry, in healthcare" and dramatic social change. Sinclair believes the technology is very powerful and that society should start preparing now. Because as he put it: "It's not an if. It's a when." David Sinclair is at SynBioBeta this year - discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. Link for tickets below. — David Sinclair

John Cumbers

203,147 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

David Sinclair on Joe Rogan Podcast - “If a 92-year-old could be 25 again, would you have sex with them?” SINCLAIR: “Yes… imagine how much they know.” Then it gets even crazier: “That day will come where you will not be able to tell how old somebody is by looking at them. You’ll have to do a test for these genes.” “People still get grossed out by old rich guys with young wives… but what if he looked 20?” “When we live for hundreds of years, people will be proud of their age. They’ll be like ‘I’m 80.’”
1:27

David Sinclair on Joe Rogan Podcast - “If a 92-year-old could be 25 again, would you have sex with them?” SINCLAIR: “Yes… imagine how much they know.” Then it gets even crazier: “That day will come where you will not be able to tell how old somebody is by looking at them. You’ll have to do a test for these genes.” “People still get grossed out by old rich guys with young wives… but what if he looked 20?” “When we live for hundreds of years, people will be proud of their age. They’ll be like ‘I’m 80.’”

Defiant Ghost

55,394 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Joe Rogan just pinpointed the EXACT moment that “woke” died. He said it was when Kid Rock gunned down several cases of Bud Light after the Dylan Mulvaney controversy. ROGAN: “There’s two things that killed woke.” “Number one, Kid Rock gunned down a whole f*cking stack of Bud Light cans!” [Rogan and Harland Williams crack up] “That was it!” WILLIAMS: “That was so good!” ROGAN: “That might have been it! Because then they got to see the real financial consequences of being f*cking completely insane.” “That people were fed up, they’re like enough. And Kid Rock saying ‘f*ck you Anheuser-Busch.’” “Like that is...that’s a BIG hit to the stock price. And then people realize, oh, this is a micro-set of people that are very loud, but it’s not the macro.” “It’s not the general population.” WILLIAMS: “It’s even smaller than micro. It’s like micro-micro.” ROGAN: “Not only that, but the people that were in it, a lot of them abandoned ship.” “It wasn’t rational and that’s why it shot down by Kid Rock.”
1:03

Joe Rogan just pinpointed the EXACT moment that “woke” died. He said it was when Kid Rock gunned down several cases of Bud Light after the Dylan Mulvaney controversy. ROGAN: “There’s two things that killed woke.” “Number one, Kid Rock gunned down a whole f*cking stack of Bud Light cans!” [Rogan and Harland Williams crack up] “That was it!” WILLIAMS: “That was so good!” ROGAN: “That might have been it! Because then they got to see the real financial consequences of being f*cking completely insane.” “That people were fed up, they’re like enough. And Kid Rock saying ‘f*ck you Anheuser-Busch.’” “Like that is...that’s a BIG hit to the stock price. And then people realize, oh, this is a micro-set of people that are very loud, but it’s not the macro.” “It’s not the general population.” WILLIAMS: “It’s even smaller than micro. It’s like micro-micro.” ROGAN: “Not only that, but the people that were in it, a lot of them abandoned ship.” “It wasn’t rational and that’s why it shot down by Kid Rock.”

Overton

639,913 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 CURRY: "The media is trying to say 'We need a Joe Rogan on the left.' You basically had one but you were so crazy that Joe started to think right." ROGAN: "They didn't want me. That's the psyop working against them. In the past they could take someone like me and demonize them and it would be effective and they could just remove you from the airwaves because you didn't play by the rules. Now people say that I'm telling the truth and then they'll stop listening to CNN and faith in them crashes and faith in mainstream media crashes and faith in podcasts rises." CURRY: "They'll probably try to hype someone up to be the Joe Rogan of the left. ROGAN: "They already are." CURRY: "Who do you think it is?" ROGAN: "Who cares. Let them try. It won't work. They don't have authenticity. When you listen to someone long enough you see if they're real. I don't lie. A lot of these people are propagandists. They try to make arguments without looking at the other side. I always try to look at the other side. It's an important quality for a person broadcasting to millions of people and also for a human being."
2:09

🚨 CURRY: "The media is trying to say 'We need a Joe Rogan on the left.' You basically had one but you were so crazy that Joe started to think right." ROGAN: "They didn't want me. That's the psyop working against them. In the past they could take someone like me and demonize them and it would be effective and they could just remove you from the airwaves because you didn't play by the rules. Now people say that I'm telling the truth and then they'll stop listening to CNN and faith in them crashes and faith in mainstream media crashes and faith in podcasts rises." CURRY: "They'll probably try to hype someone up to be the Joe Rogan of the left. ROGAN: "They already are." CURRY: "Who do you think it is?" ROGAN: "Who cares. Let them try. It won't work. They don't have authenticity. When you listen to someone long enough you see if they're real. I don't lie. A lot of these people are propagandists. They try to make arguments without looking at the other side. I always try to look at the other side. It's an important quality for a person broadcasting to millions of people and also for a human being."

Autism Capital 🧩

8,317,001 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Joe Rogan loses his first ever debate when UFO expert Diana Pasulka proves that Nazis were geniuses who had super advanced, alien-like technology back in 1947: CONTEXT: This argument was about the first famous UFO sighting made in the United States by Kenneth Arnold in 1947. You can see in the clip what the sighting looked like compared to the Nazi ships. ROGAN: “In 1947 we were dealing with propeller planes. We didn’t have anything remotely close to alien technology.” PASULKA: “We might’ve just reverse engineered those German fighter planes. They look just like the alien ships.” ROGAN: “It doesn’t make sense that our military wouldn’t be using this superior technology. We’re talking about 80 years ago. No way they had this stuff.” PASULKA: “I think it’s possible that they had some pretty amazing stuff back then.” ROGAN: “I don’t.” CONTEXT: Jamie then pulls up some pictures of some German war planes from WWII which blows Joe’s mind. ROGAN: “Woahhh. No way. Is that real?” PASULKA: “See Joe you gotta start believing me.” JAMIE: “It could be AI.” PASULKA: “Jamie come on that’s not AI. These are real pictures. Joe that looks just like the UFO that Arnold saw.” ROGAN: “You’re right it literally looks exactly like it.” PASULKA: “Thank you.” ROGAN: “How were the Germans so f*cking advanced, yet so evil at the same time.”
6:31

Joe Rogan loses his first ever debate when UFO expert Diana Pasulka proves that Nazis were geniuses who had super advanced, alien-like technology back in 1947: CONTEXT: This argument was about the first famous UFO sighting made in the United States by Kenneth Arnold in 1947. You can see in the clip what the sighting looked like compared to the Nazi ships. ROGAN: “In 1947 we were dealing with propeller planes. We didn’t have anything remotely close to alien technology.” PASULKA: “We might’ve just reverse engineered those German fighter planes. They look just like the alien ships.” ROGAN: “It doesn’t make sense that our military wouldn’t be using this superior technology. We’re talking about 80 years ago. No way they had this stuff.” PASULKA: “I think it’s possible that they had some pretty amazing stuff back then.” ROGAN: “I don’t.” CONTEXT: Jamie then pulls up some pictures of some German war planes from WWII which blows Joe’s mind. ROGAN: “Woahhh. No way. Is that real?” PASULKA: “See Joe you gotta start believing me.” JAMIE: “It could be AI.” PASULKA: “Jamie come on that’s not AI. These are real pictures. Joe that looks just like the UFO that Arnold saw.” ROGAN: “You’re right it literally looks exactly like it.” PASULKA: “Thank you.” ROGAN: “How were the Germans so f*cking advanced, yet so evil at the same time.”

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

479,253 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

New: Joe Rogan exposes to Mötley Crüe drummer Tommy Lee how people have completely fried their attention spans in the streaming era: ROGAN: “Netflix is like a dating app. The second you find a flaw or get bored it’s a swipe on to the next program.” LEE: “We have 4,000 options and we still can’t find something to watch. It’s just too much.” ROGAN: “We live in the short attention span era. If you’re watching a movie and get bored for 3 seconds you’re putting on a different show for 10 minutes until you get bored again.” LEE: “For sure it’s a problem.” ROGAN: “Most people used to watch movies from beginning to end, and now I bet that number is around 20%.” LEE: “It really affects the creators because they know they’re dealing with a bunch of 6 year old brains and if your show isn’t banging in the first 3 seconds you’ve lost that viewer.” ROGAN: “Yeah, but they don’t have to give in to that. It’s always the money people trying to force the artist to change their style so they can buy another Rolls Royce off of them.”
4:00

New: Joe Rogan exposes to Mötley Crüe drummer Tommy Lee how people have completely fried their attention spans in the streaming era: ROGAN: “Netflix is like a dating app. The second you find a flaw or get bored it’s a swipe on to the next program.” LEE: “We have 4,000 options and we still can’t find something to watch. It’s just too much.” ROGAN: “We live in the short attention span era. If you’re watching a movie and get bored for 3 seconds you’re putting on a different show for 10 minutes until you get bored again.” LEE: “For sure it’s a problem.” ROGAN: “Most people used to watch movies from beginning to end, and now I bet that number is around 20%.” LEE: “It really affects the creators because they know they’re dealing with a bunch of 6 year old brains and if your show isn’t banging in the first 3 seconds you’ve lost that viewer.” ROGAN: “Yeah, but they don’t have to give in to that. It’s always the money people trying to force the artist to change their style so they can buy another Rolls Royce off of them.”

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

164,559 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

David Sinclair says rapamycin had no measurable effect on slowing or reversing epigenetic aging in humans. This was a drug most of the longevity community supported. He was even a believer of it. It was found to extend lifespan in: • Inbred lab animals • Seemingly in dogs And everyone assumed it would translate to humans. Then a study came out about 6 months ago that compared the effect of different interventions on epigenetic age across multiple clinical trials. The results: • Caloric restriction = worked really well • Acarbose = worked really well • Metformin = "looked better than I thought it would" • Rapamycin = no effect on the age of the epigenome Zero. Nothing. Sinclair now takes rapamycin just four times a year while monitoring whether even that makes a difference. The most hyped longevity drug is being deprioritized by the scientist who is actually reversing aging. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) on Peter Diamandis' (Peter H. Diamandis, MD) Moonshots podcast PS. David Sinclair is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists shaping this space will be in the room. Grab your ticket in the comments below.
1:02

David Sinclair says rapamycin had no measurable effect on slowing or reversing epigenetic aging in humans. This was a drug most of the longevity community supported. He was even a believer of it. It was found to extend lifespan in: • Inbred lab animals • Seemingly in dogs And everyone assumed it would translate to humans. Then a study came out about 6 months ago that compared the effect of different interventions on epigenetic age across multiple clinical trials. The results: • Caloric restriction = worked really well • Acarbose = worked really well • Metformin = "looked better than I thought it would" • Rapamycin = no effect on the age of the epigenome Zero. Nothing. Sinclair now takes rapamycin just four times a year while monitoring whether even that makes a difference. The most hyped longevity drug is being deprioritized by the scientist who is actually reversing aging. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) on Peter Diamandis' (Peter H. Diamandis, MD) Moonshots podcast PS. David Sinclair is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists shaping this space will be in the room. Grab your ticket in the comments below.

John Cumbers

21,184 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

David Sinclair says the first person to live to 150 is a teenager who's alive today. He's taken flak from colleagues for years over this prediction. He doesn't care. He still stands by it. "The first person to live to 150 has already been born." Here's why: A 14-year-old today has 80+ years of exponential technological progress ahead of them. Just look at what's happened in the last 10 years: • His lab reversed aging in monkey eyes by 95% • AI now does in 2 months what would have taken thousands of years. • His team has oral molecules that made old mice young again in 4 weeks • The first human age-reversal trial begins in January And that's just the beginning. There'll be more advancements in major medical technologies and therapies soon, including in: • Gene therapy • AI-designed drugs • Whole-body rejuvenation • Epigenetic reprogramming All of it will arrive within a teenager's lifetime. Sinclair believes this is a realistic projection of where the science is heading. Sinclair's advice for everyone is to stay healthy long enough to intercept what's coming. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) on Peter Diamandis' (Peter H. Diamandis, MD) Moonshots podcast PS. David Sinclair is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists shaping this space will be in the room. Grab your ticket in the comments below.
1:04

David Sinclair says the first person to live to 150 is a teenager who's alive today. He's taken flak from colleagues for years over this prediction. He doesn't care. He still stands by it. "The first person to live to 150 has already been born." Here's why: A 14-year-old today has 80+ years of exponential technological progress ahead of them. Just look at what's happened in the last 10 years: • His lab reversed aging in monkey eyes by 95% • AI now does in 2 months what would have taken thousands of years. • His team has oral molecules that made old mice young again in 4 weeks • The first human age-reversal trial begins in January And that's just the beginning. There'll be more advancements in major medical technologies and therapies soon, including in: • Gene therapy • AI-designed drugs • Whole-body rejuvenation • Epigenetic reprogramming All of it will arrive within a teenager's lifetime. Sinclair believes this is a realistic projection of where the science is heading. Sinclair's advice for everyone is to stay healthy long enough to intercept what's coming. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) on Peter Diamandis' (Peter H. Diamandis, MD) Moonshots podcast PS. David Sinclair is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists shaping this space will be in the room. Grab your ticket in the comments below.

John Cumbers

84,263 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Joe Rogan shares a deep moment with beautiful blonde archeological researcher Cassie Coppersmith who believes there are certain ancient sites on planet Earth which carry a rare energy that can heal sick people: ROGAN: “It turns out hugging trees is actually good for you 😂😂😂” COPPERSMITH: “If you look at Earth like a human body it’s possible that these ancient sites were built on its acupuncture points.” ROGAN: “Walking barefoot on the ground is actually good for you. They call it grounding. We don’t understand why it’s so good for you.” COPPERSMITH: “These sites were built in highly energetic places. You feel different in these locations. Some people have claimed to have gotten spontaneous healings.” ROGAN: “Certain places definitely have a different effect on human beings. Even just being in the wilderness has a profound effect on how you feel. Forest bathing is a real thing.” COPPERSMITH: “I do a lot of meditations and when you meditate on top of a pyramid in Cambodia you’re able to fall right into that meditative state.” ROGAN: “People like to pretend like we fully understand what energy is. There are so many things that we can’t really measure.” COPPERSMITH: “I personally believe they built these sites on these specific locations for a reason.” ROGAN: “We’re connected to the Earth in some ways that we don’t currently understand.”
1:54

Joe Rogan shares a deep moment with beautiful blonde archeological researcher Cassie Coppersmith who believes there are certain ancient sites on planet Earth which carry a rare energy that can heal sick people: ROGAN: “It turns out hugging trees is actually good for you 😂😂😂” COPPERSMITH: “If you look at Earth like a human body it’s possible that these ancient sites were built on its acupuncture points.” ROGAN: “Walking barefoot on the ground is actually good for you. They call it grounding. We don’t understand why it’s so good for you.” COPPERSMITH: “These sites were built in highly energetic places. You feel different in these locations. Some people have claimed to have gotten spontaneous healings.” ROGAN: “Certain places definitely have a different effect on human beings. Even just being in the wilderness has a profound effect on how you feel. Forest bathing is a real thing.” COPPERSMITH: “I do a lot of meditations and when you meditate on top of a pyramid in Cambodia you’re able to fall right into that meditative state.” ROGAN: “People like to pretend like we fully understand what energy is. There are so many things that we can’t really measure.” COPPERSMITH: “I personally believe they built these sites on these specific locations for a reason.” ROGAN: “We’re connected to the Earth in some ways that we don’t currently understand.”

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

64,449 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

NEW: Joe Rogan reacts to the most insane USAID payments, says no wonder why the United States' national debt is so high. Rogan: "What the f*ck?" Bret Weinstein: "We had a shadow apparatus functioning... It involves payoffs to people who didn't deserve them. I don't think we can properly understand what these numbers mean and what they're actually being used for." Rogan: "We were always wondering, why is our debt so high? Why is the national debt so high? Like, why is our deficit so insane? Well, this is it."
3:51

NEW: Joe Rogan reacts to the most insane USAID payments, says no wonder why the United States' national debt is so high. Rogan: "What the f*ck?" Bret Weinstein: "We had a shadow apparatus functioning... It involves payoffs to people who didn't deserve them. I don't think we can properly understand what these numbers mean and what they're actually being used for." Rogan: "We were always wondering, why is our debt so high? Why is the national debt so high? Like, why is our deficit so insane? Well, this is it."

Collin Rugg

875,521 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Joe Rogan presses JD Vance on whether people involved in Epstein's crimes had "undue influence" over the release of the files. Rogan just lays out why millions of people stopped trusting the process, and makes the Vice President respond to it directly: VANCE: "The idea that Donald Trump is being blackmailed is crazy to me because, again, I see the way that he makes decisions. I see the way that he processes this stuff. The idea that he picks up the phone with anybody and says, 'Hey, I'm gonna take orders from you.' No, that's just not how Donald Trump operates." ROGAN: "Can you understand, though, why people would come to that conclusion, especially because of the Epstein files?" VANCE: "What do you mean?" ROGAN: "Well, the Epstein files were supposed to be released, and there was a tremendous amount of resistance to those files being released. And that concerned a lot of people, because if you're talking about very wealthy, powerful people that were engaged in crimes." VANCE: "I see. You're basically saying the fear is that whatever's in the Epstein files was used to blackmail the administration into doing the Iran thing." ROGAN: "Or at the very least, the people that were involved in the Epstein files that didn't want them coming out had undue influence." VANCE: "Well, again, I say this with all candor. We absolutely screwed up the comms of the Epstein files. We just did. But do I think the reason we screwed up the comms is because we were trying to hide something? No. Pam Bondi said, 'The client list is on my desk.' Right?" ROGAN: "Well, see, they had binders. They were standing in front—" VANCE: "But those binders were largely documents that had already been released." ROGAN: "What was the purpose of that performative display of the Epstein files? And she was saying there's tens of thousands of hours of film." VANCE: "I don't know what the purpose of it was, but I know that the effect of it was to make people mistrust the entire effort." "I know Pam. I like Pam. I don't think there was anything malicious going on. I think Pam was trying to respond to the political moment. I think she overstated what we had and what we didn't have. And I think that she got roasted for it publicly by a lot of people, including me." "You and I have talked about this a lot. I'm one of the OG Epstein conspiracy theorists. I've probably gone down every single rabbit hole we could go down."
2:21

Joe Rogan presses JD Vance on whether people involved in Epstein's crimes had "undue influence" over the release of the files. Rogan just lays out why millions of people stopped trusting the process, and makes the Vice President respond to it directly: VANCE: "The idea that Donald Trump is being blackmailed is crazy to me because, again, I see the way that he makes decisions. I see the way that he processes this stuff. The idea that he picks up the phone with anybody and says, 'Hey, I'm gonna take orders from you.' No, that's just not how Donald Trump operates." ROGAN: "Can you understand, though, why people would come to that conclusion, especially because of the Epstein files?" VANCE: "What do you mean?" ROGAN: "Well, the Epstein files were supposed to be released, and there was a tremendous amount of resistance to those files being released. And that concerned a lot of people, because if you're talking about very wealthy, powerful people that were engaged in crimes." VANCE: "I see. You're basically saying the fear is that whatever's in the Epstein files was used to blackmail the administration into doing the Iran thing." ROGAN: "Or at the very least, the people that were involved in the Epstein files that didn't want them coming out had undue influence." VANCE: "Well, again, I say this with all candor. We absolutely screwed up the comms of the Epstein files. We just did. But do I think the reason we screwed up the comms is because we were trying to hide something? No. Pam Bondi said, 'The client list is on my desk.' Right?" ROGAN: "Well, see, they had binders. They were standing in front—" VANCE: "But those binders were largely documents that had already been released." ROGAN: "What was the purpose of that performative display of the Epstein files? And she was saying there's tens of thousands of hours of film." VANCE: "I don't know what the purpose of it was, but I know that the effect of it was to make people mistrust the entire effort." "I know Pam. I like Pam. I don't think there was anything malicious going on. I think Pam was trying to respond to the political moment. I think she overstated what we had and what we didn't have. And I think that she got roasted for it publicly by a lot of people, including me." "You and I have talked about this a lot. I'm one of the OG Epstein conspiracy theorists. I've probably gone down every single rabbit hole we could go down."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

348,031 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Joe Rogan and Tommy Lee can’t believe how good 76-year-old Rick Springfield looks and performs Joe Rogan: “You want to see something fucking inspirational? Have you seen Rick Springfield lately?” Tommy Lee: “I did just see him. I was like, ‘Whoa, dude.’” Joe Rogan: “I’m gonna send you a video, and it’s gonna blow you away.” “This is Rick Springfield. He’s 76 years old, and he’s singing ‘Jessie’s Girl’ like he just wrote it.” “First of all, he looks fucking incredible.” “I don’t even understand it. He looks like a 30-year-old guy.” “And he’s singing the song like he just wrote it.” Tommy Lee: “That’s fucking inspirational.” “That is amazing.” “I saw that clip and I was like, ‘Whoa.’” Joe Rogan: “Lots of people in their 70s are just waiting to die.” “This dude is on stage with no shirt on, fucking shit up.” Tommy Lee: “I love it.” “That’s gonna be me 10 years from now, just rocking shit.”
2:18

Joe Rogan and Tommy Lee can’t believe how good 76-year-old Rick Springfield looks and performs Joe Rogan: “You want to see something fucking inspirational? Have you seen Rick Springfield lately?” Tommy Lee: “I did just see him. I was like, ‘Whoa, dude.’” Joe Rogan: “I’m gonna send you a video, and it’s gonna blow you away.” “This is Rick Springfield. He’s 76 years old, and he’s singing ‘Jessie’s Girl’ like he just wrote it.” “First of all, he looks fucking incredible.” “I don’t even understand it. He looks like a 30-year-old guy.” “And he’s singing the song like he just wrote it.” Tommy Lee: “That’s fucking inspirational.” “That is amazing.” “I saw that clip and I was like, ‘Whoa.’” Joe Rogan: “Lots of people in their 70s are just waiting to die.” “This dude is on stage with no shirt on, fucking shit up.” Tommy Lee: “I love it.” “That’s gonna be me 10 years from now, just rocking shit.”

agim𓍯

142,336 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Joe Rogan says America is beyond repair as he, Josh Thomson, and Big John McCarthy discuss why they believe California’s homelessness crisis reflects deeper failures in Government. Josh Thomson: This is not what it used to be… For the first time, I didn’t feel safe there. Joe Rogan: How do you bring it back? Who do you get to turn the state around? Big John McCarthy: It’s better for them to be put into a place where they can receive medication, receive some help, and try to get them back than it is to let these people just rot on the street. Joe Rogan: We’ve lost our way as a society. A great reflection of that is how many homeless people you have camped out on your streets. Joe Rogan: Those are the places where they’ve lost their way the most. Josh Thomson: I own a couple gyms in San Jose, and it was tent city… all along the road that led up to my gym.
3:43

Joe Rogan says America is beyond repair as he, Josh Thomson, and Big John McCarthy discuss why they believe California’s homelessness crisis reflects deeper failures in Government. Josh Thomson: This is not what it used to be… For the first time, I didn’t feel safe there. Joe Rogan: How do you bring it back? Who do you get to turn the state around? Big John McCarthy: It’s better for them to be put into a place where they can receive medication, receive some help, and try to get them back than it is to let these people just rot on the street. Joe Rogan: We’ve lost our way as a society. A great reflection of that is how many homeless people you have camped out on your streets. Joe Rogan: Those are the places where they’ve lost their way the most. Josh Thomson: I own a couple gyms in San Jose, and it was tent city… all along the road that led up to my gym.

Ridwan

48,886 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat