Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

New Preprint📣 "Beyond the Chat💬: Executable▶️ and Verifiable✅ Text-Editing with LLMs" Getting help from LLMs when editing a document can involve lots of manual copy-pasting.✂️📋 What if LLMs could instead suggest one-click edits directly in a text editor for your review? 1/N

11,825 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

8 Yorum

Philippe Laban profil fotoğrafı
Philippe Laban2 yıl önce

To communicate desired edit locations 📍 to the LLM, the user can initiate *local comment conversations*. No need to say “cut some detail from paragraph 8.” 2/N

Philippe Laban profil fotoğrafı
Philippe Laban2 yıl önce

The Chat and Comments are reactive, and require user initiation. The user can also define *Markers* 🖍️, which run continuously in the background and suggest edits proactively ✨. Markers are similar to a customizable Grammarly. 3/N

Philippe Laban profil fotoğrafı
Philippe Laban2 yıl önce

LLMs make factual errors ❌. In InkSync, we introduce a Warn-Verify-Audit framework to mitigate inaccuracy risks. The user gets *warned*⚠️ when an edit introduces new information, and the system generates search queries 🔍 to help the user *verify* ✅ information accuracy. 4/N

Philippe Laban profil fotoğrafı
Philippe Laban2 yıl önce

Once editing is complete, an auditor 🕵️‍♂️ can review the document in an *Audit Interface* that tracks and surfaces all LLM-generated content. This facilitates manual verification of accuracy before the document is sent, published or finalized ✔️. 5/N

Philippe Laban profil fotoğrafı
Philippe Laban2 yıl önce

Check our paper ( for details, including two usability studies. InkSync is a collaboration of @PhilippeLaban, @jesse_vig, @MartiHearst, @CaimingXiong & @jasonwu0731 We plan to release a public demo of InkSync. Interested?📋👇

Matt Figdore profil fotoğrafı
Matt Figdore2 yıl önce

This is the biggest productivity cheat code right now. Kiss reading documents goodbye. You can get an instant summary of any document with this tool.

TracyYXChen profil fotoğrafı
TracyYXChen2 yıl önce

why @Grammarly hasn't implemented this? My guess: the inference cost is eating the profit

Philippe Laban profil fotoğrafı
Philippe Laban2 yıl önce

@Grammarly Good question. I think they have some limited LLM features in Grammarly GO, but yes the cost might be prohibitive at scale (advantage of being a researcher!). Btw, we recently released a public demo of InkSync: for anyone who's curious!

Benzer Videolar

A 4-year-old child has seen 50x more information than the biggest LLMs. Yann LeCun is the Chief AI Scientist at Meta. He recently spoke on “The Expanding Universe of Generative Models” panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos. Yann highlighted the idea that a 4-year-old child is way smarter than current cutting-edge large language models (LLMs). “Think about what a child sees through vision. Put a number on how much information a 4-year-old child has seen during their life. It’s 20 Mbps going through the optical nerve for 16,000 wake hours in the first 4 years of life. 3,600 seconds per hour is 10^15 bytes. This is 50x more information than the biggest LLMs we have. A 4-year-old child is way smarter than these models having acquired an enormous amount of knowledge about how the world works.” The real constraint right now is the ability of LLMs to think. Today, LLMs are only capable of System 1 thinking. System 1 vs System 2 thinking was popularised in the book 'Thinking, Fast and Slow' by Daniel Kahneman. System 1 tasks involve quick, instinctive, automatic responses. LLMs struggle with discontinuous tasks that require a creative leap in progress as they imitate human responses. It's hard to go above human response accuracy if LLMs are only trained on humans. Models are building the track in front of them with each word being generated. What could it mean to give language models System 2 thinking? This remains a future development I'm excited about.

Alex Banks

22,985 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce