正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Nuclear generates up to 1,000x more power per square meter than wind/solar. That's why wind and solar need 10–25x more materials for the same energy output. Which energy source is actually "green?" Full video:

Ben (Promethean Action)

5,441 subscribers

22,781 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

If emissions reduction were the real goal, nuclear would already dominate. First off, it is the safest energy source per unit of power produced. Secondly, it has the lowest life cycle CO2 emissions, lower than coal, gas and even wind and solar. Thirdly, nuclear runs 93% of the time. Wind and solar don't come anywhere near that, just 33% and 23% respectively. And on top of all that, a one gigawatt nuclear plant fits on about one square mile and powers 750,000 homes. Wind and solar require vastly more land, materials and backup batteries for the same power. If climate alarmism were serious, the answer would be nuclear.

If emissions reduction were the real goal, nuclear would already dominate. First off, it is the safest energy source per unit of power produced. Secondly, it has the lowest life cycle CO2 emissions, lower than coal, gas and even wind and solar. Thirdly, nuclear runs 93% of the time. Wind and solar don't come anywhere near that, just 33% and 23% respectively. And on top of all that, a one gigawatt nuclear plant fits on about one square mile and powers 750,000 homes. Wind and solar require vastly more land, materials and backup batteries for the same power. If climate alarmism were serious, the answer would be nuclear.

Electroverse

12,082 次观看 • 1 个月前

If emissions reduction were the real goal, nuclear would already dominate. First off, it is the safest energy source per unit of power produced. Secondly, it has the lowest life cycle CO2 emissions. Lower than coal, gas and even wind and solar. Thirdly, nuclear runs 93% of the time. Wind and solar don't come anywhere near that, just 33% and 23% respectively. And on top of all that, a one-gigawatt nuclear plant fits on about one square mile and powers 750,000 homes. Wind and solar require vastly more land, materials and backup batteries for the same power. If climate alarmism were serious, the answer would be nuclear. The rest is just theater.

If emissions reduction were the real goal, nuclear would already dominate. First off, it is the safest energy source per unit of power produced. Secondly, it has the lowest life cycle CO2 emissions. Lower than coal, gas and even wind and solar. Thirdly, nuclear runs 93% of the time. Wind and solar don't come anywhere near that, just 33% and 23% respectively. And on top of all that, a one-gigawatt nuclear plant fits on about one square mile and powers 750,000 homes. Wind and solar require vastly more land, materials and backup batteries for the same power. If climate alarmism were serious, the answer would be nuclear. The rest is just theater.

Electroverse

16,013 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇺🇸 ENERGY SEC. WRIGHT: WIND AND SOLAR CAN’T REPLACE RELIABLE ENERGY "The problem with wind is that the wind doesn't always blow. If the wind is blowing, you can say it's powered by wind power, then the wind stops or the wind gets weaker. Something has to fill that gap in always be there. So when you add wind and solar onto a grid, you don't remove the need for coal plants, for nuclear plants, for natural gas plants, that work all the time. So to maintain two grids instead of one grid is always more expensive." Source: Fox News

🇺🇸 ENERGY SEC. WRIGHT: WIND AND SOLAR CAN’T REPLACE RELIABLE ENERGY "The problem with wind is that the wind doesn't always blow. If the wind is blowing, you can say it's powered by wind power, then the wind stops or the wind gets weaker. Something has to fill that gap in always be there. So when you add wind and solar onto a grid, you don't remove the need for coal plants, for nuclear plants, for natural gas plants, that work all the time. So to maintain two grids instead of one grid is always more expensive." Source: Fox News

Mario Nawfal

208,235 次观看 • 11 个月前

The best energy policy is always energy freedom, which means: * Sell American energy abroad — *and* cut tariffs * End wind/solar subsidies and mandates — *and* allow wind and solar to compete on a real market

The best energy policy is always energy freedom, which means: * Sell American energy abroad — and cut tariffs * End wind/solar subsidies and mandates — and allow wind and solar to compete on a real market

Alex Epstein

18,590 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: Here's what we need to have a fully sustainable energy economy. “There are three elements to a sustainable energy future. One is sustainable energy generation, which is primarily wind and solar. There's also hydro, geothermal. I'm actually pro-nuclear. I think nuclear is fine. But it's going to be primarily solar and wind as the primary generators of energy. The second part is you need batteries to store the solar and wind energy, because the sun doesn't shine all the time, the wind doesn't blow all the time. So it's a lot of stationary battery packs. And then you need electric transport. So electric cars, electric planes, boats. And ultimately we can have a fully sustainable energy economy. And it's those three things: solar/wind, stationary battery pack, electric vehicles. So then what are the limiting factors on progress? The limiting factor really will be battery cell production. So that's going to really be the fundamental rate driver.” Source: TED, April 14, 2022.

Elon Musk: Here's what we need to have a fully sustainable energy economy. “There are three elements to a sustainable energy future. One is sustainable energy generation, which is primarily wind and solar. There's also hydro, geothermal. I'm actually pro-nuclear. I think nuclear is fine. But it's going to be primarily solar and wind as the primary generators of energy. The second part is you need batteries to store the solar and wind energy, because the sun doesn't shine all the time, the wind doesn't blow all the time. So it's a lot of stationary battery packs. And then you need electric transport. So electric cars, electric planes, boats. And ultimately we can have a fully sustainable energy economy. And it's those three things: solar/wind, stationary battery pack, electric vehicles. So then what are the limiting factors on progress? The limiting factor really will be battery cell production. So that's going to really be the fundamental rate driver.” Source: TED, April 14, 2022.

ELON CLIPS

12,928 次观看 • 1 个月前

Power prices rise by up to 9% Bowen’s response: 1️⃣ Double down on his solar & wind fantasy 2️⃣ Lie about solar and wind delivering the cheapest & most reliable energy 3️⃣ Hide the damage with ‘energy bill relief’ ✍️Sign to lift the nuclear ban:

Power prices rise by up to 9% Bowen’s response: 1️⃣ Double down on his solar & wind fantasy 2️⃣ Lie about solar and wind delivering the cheapest & most reliable energy 3️⃣ Hide the damage with ‘energy bill relief’ ✍️Sign to lift the nuclear ban:

Will Shackel

19,858 次观看 • 1 年前

Governor Maura Healey just announced bold action to lower energy bills & unleash more solar, storage, wind, geothermal, & nuclear power. Massachusetts is leading an energy revolution — & building the workforce to sustain it. Learn more ➡️

Governor Maura Healey just announced bold action to lower energy bills & unleash more solar, storage, wind, geothermal, & nuclear power. Massachusetts is leading an energy revolution — & building the workforce to sustain it. Learn more ➡️

U.S. Climate Alliance

11,163 次观看 • 4 个月前

In recent years, CDT has vigorously developed clean energy sources such as wind power, solar power and hydropower, accelerating its green and low-carbon transformation. Click the video to witness how CDT is lighting up a green future with clean energy. CDTO

In recent years, CDT has vigorously developed clean energy sources such as wind power, solar power and hydropower, accelerating its green and low-carbon transformation. Click the video to witness how CDT is lighting up a green future with clean energy. CDTO

CDT

128,028 次观看 • 8 个月前

Thiessen: Just so people understand wind and solar only work when there is wind and sun. We don't have technology to store the energy from wind and solar…

Thiessen: Just so people understand wind and solar only work when there is wind and sun. We don't have technology to store the energy from wind and solar…

Acyn

5,011,975 次观看 • 1 年前

ELON: THE WORLD CAN BE POWERED ENTIRELY BY SOLAR AND BATTERIES “The energy that reaches the Earth from the Sun is staggeringly high. We have this enormous fusion generator in the sky that is lobbing out vast amounts of energy. If you take a nuclear plant, took its current output and compared that to putting solar panels on the area used by the nuclear power plant. The solar panels would typically generate more power than the nuclear power plant.” Source: Elon Musk

ELON: THE WORLD CAN BE POWERED ENTIRELY BY SOLAR AND BATTERIES “The energy that reaches the Earth from the Sun is staggeringly high. We have this enormous fusion generator in the sky that is lobbing out vast amounts of energy. If you take a nuclear plant, took its current output and compared that to putting solar panels on the area used by the nuclear power plant. The solar panels would typically generate more power than the nuclear power plant.” Source: Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

46,577 次观看 • 1 年前

Since April 2020, the United States has spent $1.5 trillion on wind and solar. All that money for just 17% of the nation's energy mix. For the same cost, America could have built around 40 nuclear power plants. They'd run for 80 years, not 15 or 20 like wind and solar, and would generate at least three times more power each year. That's the real cost of believing the climate fantasy - enormous waste, destabilized grids, and spiraling energy costs.

Since April 2020, the United States has spent $1.5 trillion on wind and solar. All that money for just 17% of the nation's energy mix. For the same cost, America could have built around 40 nuclear power plants. They'd run for 80 years, not 15 or 20 like wind and solar, and would generate at least three times more power each year. That's the real cost of believing the climate fantasy - enormous waste, destabilized grids, and spiraling energy costs.

Electroverse

99,242 次观看 • 3 个月前

HE’S LYING Notwithstanding solar and wind are not "clean energy", it’s an outright lie to claim there is a "global shift to clean energy". The data is clear - there is no "global shift" Globally the world is using more coal, more gas, more oil and more nuclear. It’s also using more solar and more wind and more of everything else - but globally solar and wind are not REPLACING fossil fuels - they are merely ADDITIONAL. Further, Australia is the only nation in world attempting to replace its fossil fuels with prominently intermittent weather dependent sources of energy - solar and wind. No other nation is doing it, because it’s uneconomic and will only impoverish a nation if foolishly attempted. Blackout Bowen’s lies must be called out, because they are going to destroy Australia.

HE’S LYING Notwithstanding solar and wind are not "clean energy", it’s an outright lie to claim there is a "global shift to clean energy". The data is clear - there is no "global shift" Globally the world is using more coal, more gas, more oil and more nuclear. It’s also using more solar and more wind and more of everything else - but globally solar and wind are not REPLACING fossil fuels - they are merely ADDITIONAL. Further, Australia is the only nation in world attempting to replace its fossil fuels with prominently intermittent weather dependent sources of energy - solar and wind. No other nation is doing it, because it’s uneconomic and will only impoverish a nation if foolishly attempted. Blackout Bowen’s lies must be called out, because they are going to destroy Australia.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

20,689 次观看 • 10 个月前

91% of the energy powering the East Coast right now comes from nuclear, coal, and natural gas. Where are wind and solar when they are actually needed? “Green” energy disappears when demand peaks and heat hits hardest.

91% of the energy powering the East Coast right now comes from nuclear, coal, and natural gas. Where are wind and solar when they are actually needed? “Green” energy disappears when demand peaks and heat hits hardest.

Daniel Turner

25,616 次观看 • 23 天前

.Secretary Chris Wright: "When you add wind and solar onto a grid, you don't remove the need for coal plants, nuclear plants, and natural gas plants. You just end up having to maintain two grids. Maintaining two grids is ALWAYS more expensive."

.Secretary Chris Wright: "When you add wind and solar onto a grid, you don't remove the need for coal plants, nuclear plants, and natural gas plants. You just end up having to maintain two grids. Maintaining two grids is ALWAYS more expensive."

U.S. Department of Energy

594,982 次观看 • 11 个月前

Most renewable electricity in the world is not wind or solar, it is hydropower. Hydro produces about 14% of global electricity, and more than half of all renewable power. It is reliable, dispatchable, and produces virtually no CO2 - yet many environmental groups oppose new dams. The same contradiction appears with nuclear power. Nuclear produces zero operational CO2, runs 24 hours a day, and uses far less land than wind or solar. If cutting emissions were truly the priority here, the focus would be obvious: Hydropower and nuclear, not endless wind and solar expansion.

Most renewable electricity in the world is not wind or solar, it is hydropower. Hydro produces about 14% of global electricity, and more than half of all renewable power. It is reliable, dispatchable, and produces virtually no CO2 - yet many environmental groups oppose new dams. The same contradiction appears with nuclear power. Nuclear produces zero operational CO2, runs 24 hours a day, and uses far less land than wind or solar. If cutting emissions were truly the priority here, the focus would be obvious: Hydropower and nuclear, not endless wind and solar expansion.

Electroverse

11,913 次观看 • 4 个月前

🇨🇳🇺🇸 ELON: CHINA'S SOLAR SURGE IS HALF OF THE U.S. POWER "China's production capacity for solar is 1500GW/year. They're deploying over 1000GW/year of solar. For a continuous solar load, you divide that by roughly 4 or 5. That's around 250GW of steady state power paired with batteries. That's half of the average power usage in the U.S. China can provide steady state power, and batteries can do half of the U.S. electricity output per year just for solar. Solar is by far the biggest source of energy." Source: Elon Musk, WEF

🇨🇳🇺🇸 ELON: CHINA'S SOLAR SURGE IS HALF OF THE U.S. POWER "China's production capacity for solar is 1500GW/year. They're deploying over 1000GW/year of solar. For a continuous solar load, you divide that by roughly 4 or 5. That's around 250GW of steady state power paired with batteries. That's half of the average power usage in the U.S. China can provide steady state power, and batteries can do half of the U.S. electricity output per year just for solar. Solar is by far the biggest source of energy." Source: Elon Musk, WEF

Mario Nawfal

606,153 次观看 • 6 个月前

Make no mistake: America needs coal! 🇺🇸 Coal remains the backbone of global electricity. It also produces nearly TEN times more global energy—to the total global energy supply—than wind, solar and batteries combined.

Make no mistake: America needs coal! 🇺🇸 Coal remains the backbone of global electricity. It also produces nearly TEN times more global energy—to the total global energy supply—than wind, solar and batteries combined.

U.S. Department of Energy

30,496 次观看 • 9 个月前

Wind turbines are getting bigger, more efficient, and are delivering higher output. That sounds impressive, but it isn't compared to other sources. A single nuclear plant, for example, produces around 1,750 megawatts. To match that, you need roughly 150 large turbines. Wind uses over 100X more land than nuclear for the same output. And turbines, of course, only produce power when the wind is blowing. Nuclear is constant. Then there's the storage requirements. To make wind reliable, you need batteries. At grid scale, that becomes impossible with current technologies. Wind power remains an expensive pipe dream, lining the pockets of a few at the expense of the many.

Wind turbines are getting bigger, more efficient, and are delivering higher output. That sounds impressive, but it isn't compared to other sources. A single nuclear plant, for example, produces around 1,750 megawatts. To match that, you need roughly 150 large turbines. Wind uses over 100X more land than nuclear for the same output. And turbines, of course, only produce power when the wind is blowing. Nuclear is constant. Then there's the storage requirements. To make wind reliable, you need batteries. At grid scale, that becomes impossible with current technologies. Wind power remains an expensive pipe dream, lining the pockets of a few at the expense of the many.

Electroverse

21,606 次观看 • 3 个月前

America. Builds. Power. From solar and wind to storage and steel — clean power is energizing a U.S. manufacturing boom, creating good-paying jobs and building a stronger, more reliable energy future. #AmericaBuildsPower #MadeInAmerica

America. Builds. Power. From solar and wind to storage and steel — clean power is energizing a U.S. manufacturing boom, creating good-paying jobs and building a stronger, more reliable energy future. #AmericaBuildsPower #MadeInAmerica

American Clean Power (ACP)

11,610 次观看 • 1 年前