Ocean Heat Source 04: Now that I’ve pinned down the abyssal warming pattern, it’s time to investigate possible sources. I’m working through five main possibilities: 1. Adiabatic compression : could the water only appear warmer because it moved deeper and got squeezed? This one is already looking weak. 2.... Redistribution and isopycnal heave: could density layers be moving up and down and shifting existing heat around? 3. Antarctic Bottom Water and overturning: could changing deep ocean circulation be carrying warmer water into the abyss? 4. Geothermal and hydrothermal heating : could heat be entering from the seafloor, ridges, or vents? 5. Electromagnetic induction and ohmic heating: could changing magnetic fields drive electric currents, and could enough of that electrical energy turn into heat? I’ll need my electromagnetic solver to finish that last test. Now, we get to see which mechanisms survive testing.show more

In each derivation test, it would be good to know if the model is empirical (observational-outcome driven) or theoretical (driven by known equations).

Agreed, I’ll make that explicit for each test. The adiabatic compression, redistribution and isopycnal heave, ABW and overturning, and geothermal/hydrothermal tests are mainly empirical, using observed ocean and heat flow data with physical constraints. The electromagnetic induction and ohmic-heating test will be a physics based forward model, then checked against observations.

EM solved… standard Maxwell or Alfven physics? ;)

Had to look up Alfven 😄 I’m using Maxwell for the Earth induction part. Later, I could add an Alfven/MHD module for how the disturbance couples through the magnetosphere into the ionosphere.

A few days ago I was thinking #5 Induction Heating given the changing magnetic fields and the salts/metals in the ocean water. Unequal salt content by location and by depth. Grok kept telling me it's a non-issue ... so it should stay on your list. It may not be direct Earth induction heating but the weakening magnetic shield is allowing more solar induction charging of the system with fast plasma streams issuing from Coronal Holes or the Sun's magnetic field flip influencing Earth's core more which gets to your #4.

Awesome! Thanks for summing up the research questions in simpler terms that can be easily understood by us not-so-technical nerds

I did that specifically for you 😉

😊

Your work is super interesting, I watch this one with great interest. 🙏🏻

fwiw I find intriguing the superconductor loop Meissner Effect instability resulting in weakening geomagnetic force while increasing inductive heating. Ties things together nicely. But heck what do I know? ..

Thanks, waiting patiently

Number 5. Suggested this before. At work but will try and find it later.

What's this about the northern jet stream disappearing the last couple of days? I can't find any good info. Is it nonsense? Is it real? Does it matter?

#4 - undersea volcanos - barely starting to be mapped

Stupid question but…. On the surface ..urban temperature readings ratio to rural readings were manipulated to make global warming look worse. How do you screw with the numbers at the depths of the seas….are there a lot more readings around known deep sea hotspot? Prove it’s not a stupid question

I would put my money on the last two .

Magnetic heating is interesting- maybe the magnetic bands are causing a microwave effect

(Layman) possible that the magnetic fields that twist and move, similar to but not identical to the Sun’s, could be a mechanism. I believe the Sun’s core and Earth’s core are related to how this energy is transferred. General relativity is also considered.

@EthicalSkeptic why didn't "the science" explore the source of this heat during a string of very cold winters in Antarctica Cant Carbon tax the core Must look away

Ty. Details appreciated

@SunWeatherMan has galactic current sheet info Interplay with core dynamics Polar wander flip on axis Core releases heat at boundary Hot spots evidenced by decline in antartic sea ice fr heat below not measure by floats "looking away" @EthicalSkeptic

4. Faults vents rings of fire are well known Point source heat could be well mapped and studied already Its telling that they are not @EthicalSkeptic nelsonian knowledge of where NOT TO LOOK NARRATIVE is to sell enforce a global carbon tax. Perhaps $10TR could stop AGW

Now look into the HAARP type facilities and the nutrino facility (and it's whistleblower) and their capabilities along with aerosol injection and solar radiation mamangement

I would lean more on the lines of UV light ,infrared light. other light bands were not watching 👀 have been altered from the dust on the Suns corona and it’s heating up plankton or small microscopic whatever’s. water is as far as I know the hardest thing to change temp🤫

#5 sounds likely, given the solar activity lately interacting with the earth's magnetic field.

imo it’s number 5 and I think all stars are created by Z-pinch’s and as we’re entering the galactic magnetic equator the z-pinch is compressing and cranking up the energy output

Dumb question. In a microwave oven, there is a sweet spot that heats/cooks better than others. Could this observed depth be the sweet spot for electromagnetic heating or something like that. Could a weakenig of earth's magnetic shield be your source?

Another thought

5

4. Geothermal heating. You have to trash this crust/mantle/core business for the honeycombed/hollow/expanding scenario with an internal energy source. Think of going underwater to avoid a storm. Surface chaotic, deep underneath cool and calm.

A combination of things must align. Known mechanisms: Sustained reduced Trade Winds Reduced Upwelling/mixing Increased Shortwave absorption/Reduced low Clouds Other more "exotic" factors described above could also contribute... worth investigation.

🔥. Wherever your investigation leads.

can you make an analysis of polar motion data that may corroborate or concur with the idea of Zachariaspro that chandler and annual wobble are both drastically downgrading and that derives for a decoupled earth?

4 and 5 from cosmic activity of some kind iihtg

I’ll put $5 on #4

Nice one

Navier-Stokes and Maxwell's equations are fundamentally flawed. Hope you solve that first.