正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Ox Alpha vs Opus 5 i asked both models to build rocket engine using three.js ox-alpha is not even close to opus 5 performance and it took equal or more time for the output prompt used for both: "Create a 3d SpaceX raptor engine using three.js, use white theme...

104,605 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

45 条评论

vengeful181 的头像
vengeful1812 个月前

I think you are a hater, the model is amazing and antrhopic is shitting their pants now for real. I find this model insanely good

Tim Jayas 的头像
Tim Jayas2 个月前

no doubt it’s a good model but it’s no way as good as Claude fable 5 or Opus 5

vengeful181 的头像
vengeful1812 个月前

I think it is, in my 3d testing is really good

ysdevastro 的头像
ysdevastro2 个月前

Who cares if it's not like fable, its free! And once free is gone, it will be cheap. We don't want fable, we don't have endless money to spend on fable and these extra expensive models. We want a great balance. Grok is a great balance, and Ox is free for now.

alvinyap.base.eth 的头像
alvinyap.base.eth2 个月前

It's speculated to be GLM 5.3 Flash, and if a Flash model can come this close to frontier then it's really impressive and frontier labs indeed should be worried Evidence: 1) EXACT same tokenizer as GLM family since GLM 4.5 2) Upstream error message: identical with GLM 5.3's error string, this is infra level setup, rules out third party fine tuning possibility like Cursor's composer 3

Tim Jayas 的头像
Tim Jayas2 个月前

also GLM 5 was codenamed Pony Aplha, very similar to this Ox Aplha

alvinyap.base.eth 的头像
alvinyap.base.eth2 个月前

It's said that Chinese AI influencers where shocked when they knew the size of the model. I am guessing WAY smaller than GLM 5.3... Possibly much smaller than DeepSeek V4 Flash?

acidguyx 的头像
acidguyx2 个月前

ox alpha is really really dummy, tested it with some evaisl and its really dumb, must be a chinese model.

Tim Jayas 的头像
Tim Jayas2 个月前

that might really be a chinese model looking at the way it responses

blipblip 的头像
blipblip2 个月前

That IS a SpaceX raptor engine from Ox. It’s just from the future.

Tim Jayas 的头像
Tim Jayas2 个月前

😭😂

Peter 的头像
Peter2 个月前

“I did one prompt to two models that each represent different sides of the most impressive current technology known to man. This ONE result says EVERYTHING you need to know” this is such a whack take it is silly

Marcel Spatz 的头像
Marcel Spatz2 个月前

As many users would agree, ox alpha is an outstanding model and rivals fable 5, not sure if you’re Anthropic Pilled or ignorant trying to ignore the fact that the chinese market is taking openai and anthropic from behind

Sachin 的头像
Sachin2 个月前

But if we consider the price 💀

Tim Jayas 的头像
Tim Jayas2 个月前

Ox is free 🥀

Emmett 的头像
Emmett2 个月前

This build is a good eval for model performance

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I2 个月前

opus all the way man

Tim Jayas 的头像
Tim Jayas2 个月前

no one beats Opus 5 in terms of performance quality

AI Mastery Guide 的头像
AI Mastery Guide2 个月前

Opus 5 still ahead, no surprise

Min Khooptong 的头像
Min Khooptong2 个月前

I won't be paying particularly for Ox Alpha. It does not live up to the hype.

BranchGhost 的头像
BranchGhost2 个月前

And you forgot to mention that Claude burns through your weekly quota with just one prompt like that, while ox-alpha is completely unlimited and free (at least for now).

weigi 的头像
weigi2 个月前

yeah that tracks. ox alpha still feels flash-tier. opus 5 just builds the thing

T 的头像
T2 个月前

Maybe because Ox Alpha does not have subagents and the ultracode option? What harness was used?

Henry Schlesinger 的头像
Henry Schlesinger2 个月前

See how good grok does. With spacex eng data in training set result could be interesting

Tim Jayas 的头像
Tim Jayas2 个月前

I did with Grok 4.6 and it's pretty good

Anton Kuratnik | AI Nerd 的头像
Anton Kuratnik | AI Nerd2 个月前

That's my feel too. Very good model but doesn't feel "frontier" on complex tasks.

Nimi 的头像
Nimi2 个月前

haven’t used ox alpha before but with my little experience with opus i’m not surprised it clears

Ivan Pochta 🇺🇦 的头像
Ivan Pochta 🇺🇦2 个月前

I'm really liking this model so far. It found vulnerabilities in the code on the first try that Fable 5, Opus 5, Kimi K3, and Qwen 3.8 couldn't find twice. And, unlike others, it worked an order of magnitude faster (at least 5 times faster than Chinese ones).

Haroon 的头像
Haroon2 个月前

On my test ox perform better

Knowix 的头像
Knowix2 个月前

honestly, i’d need to see a lot more from ox alpha before taking it seriously for agentic coding,this result isn’t very convincing

Tim Jayas 的头像
Tim Jayas2 个月前

most importantly we want to see who is behind that model

Marco Fiocco 的头像
Marco Fiocco2 个月前

just use @mattpocockuk skills and try again

yayacisse_dev 的头像
yayacisse_dev1 个月前

Hi. How can I use this ai locally in PC improve my work? Can you tell the process d'installations please?

griffin fuzzystripes 的头像
griffin fuzzystripes2 个月前

Cursor 3 trained on GLM

badmaash 的头像
badmaash2 个月前

Slop teat

Alex Southwell (he/him) 的头像
Alex Southwell (he/him)2 个月前

What harness?

abacooked 的头像
abacooked2 个月前

You're right, Ox Alpha is not even close to opus 5. I've been using Ox Alpha for a while and it's shit. I got more pleasure from using Gemini 3.7 Flash.

Greg Glazewski 的头像
Greg Glazewski2 个月前

show the output bc i bet opus' code is just longer not better. sometimes concise wins

ㄥᎧꀘꀤ- BNB Wizard 🧙‍♂️🪄 的头像
ㄥᎧꀘꀤ- BNB Wizard 🧙‍♂️🪄2 个月前

I find the same lol its not that much good in these task. I have been trying to generate a decent looking html file and its keep fucking it up.

Nothing News 的头像
Nothing News2 个月前

Ox alpha is so obviously a Google model

ideatorx 的头像
ideatorx2 个月前

What harness did you use for both? I find massive gaps in performance depending on the harness

Pan's 的头像
Pan's2 个月前

Ox Alpha . from China Model.

Francis Maximus Ultimato 的头像
Francis Maximus Ultimato2 个月前

Let us wait and see what it is under the hood.

Yorikai 的头像
Yorikai2 个月前

Qwen3.8-27B. Source:

Sebastian Buzdugan 的头像
Sebastian Buzdugan2 个月前

one render mostly tests three.js priors, not general coding performance across models

相关视频