正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Ox Alpha vs Opus 5 i asked both models to build rocket engine using three.js ox-alpha is not even close to opus 5 performance and it took equal or more time for the output prompt used for both: "Create a 3d SpaceX raptor engine using three.js, use white theme... show more

Tim Jayas

4,604 subscribers

104,225 次观看 • 13 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

GLM-5.3 Flash in already nerfed? I compared Ox Alpha in it's prime vs today just before it got revealed as GLM-5.3 Flash using the same prompt to build 3d raptor engine using three.js OxAlpha on 24th August gave far more accurate output compared to today which looks way worse prompt i used: Create a 3d SpaceX raptor engine using three.js, use white theme background so the main object is clearly visible

GLM-5.3 Flash in already nerfed? I compared Ox Alpha in it's prime vs today just before it got revealed as GLM-5.3 Flash using the same prompt to build 3d raptor engine using three.js OxAlpha on 24th August gave far more accurate output compared to today which looks way worse prompt i used: Create a 3d SpaceX raptor engine using three.js, use white theme background so the main object is clearly visible

Tim Jayas

78,962 次观看 • 8 天前

new Ox Alpha is kind of absurd One prompt, 64,745 output tokens, and no external assets: Ox Alpha generated the code for an entire Three.js dreamcore 3D scene/world in a single shot. AI/ML API ran this demo and they are also giving Ox Alpha free on aimlapi[.]com - 1M context window - Max output: ~131k tokens - Multimodal: text + image + video input → text output - Explicitly positioned as a reasoning model for coding, long-horizon/agentic software engineering, sustained production workloads, and tasks that mix text with visual context

new Ox Alpha is kind of absurd One prompt, 64,745 output tokens, and no external assets: Ox Alpha generated the code for an entire Three.js dreamcore 3D scene/world in a single shot. AI/ML API ran this demo and they are also giving Ox Alpha free on aimlapi[.]com - 1M context window - Max output: ~131k tokens - Multimodal: text + image + video input → text output - Explicitly positioned as a reasoning model for coding, long-horizon/agentic software engineering, sustained production workloads, and tasks that mix text with visual context

Rohan Paul

13,576 次观看 • 12 天前

I feel Ox Alpha has continual learning and is modifying itself each day coz how else does it keep improving on it's own? i gave it the same prompt i used on the first day and the output is drastically improved, with a more detailed and accurate 3d model of raptor engine

I feel Ox Alpha has continual learning and is modifying itself each day coz how else does it keep improving on it's own? i gave it the same prompt i used on the first day and the output is drastically improved, with a more detailed and accurate 3d model of raptor engine

Tim Jayas

544,566 次观看 • 10 天前

Qwen3.8 Max vs Opus 5 (Max) build a 3d steam engine working prototype using three.js one of the most expensive model vs a model you can run locally for free Chinese open model is going head to head with world's top closed model rn who did it better?

Qwen3.8 Max vs Opus 5 (Max) build a 3d steam engine working prototype using three.js one of the most expensive model vs a model you can run locally for free Chinese open model is going head to head with world's top closed model rn who did it better?

Tim Jayas

37,286 次观看 • 18 天前

🚨 Ox Alpha might actually be AGI I gave it and GPT-5.6 Sol (Ultra) the exact same prompt to build a website with cursor-reactive magnetic motion. Ox Alpha delivered faster and, in this test, far more accurately. the motion feels better, the graphics look cleaner, and even the font choices are way ahead of what GPT-5.6 Sol gave me. I’ll drop the exact prompt I used in the comments for anyone who wants to try it.

🚨 Ox Alpha might actually be AGI I gave it and GPT-5.6 Sol (Ultra) the exact same prompt to build a website with cursor-reactive magnetic motion. Ox Alpha delivered faster and, in this test, far more accurately. the motion feels better, the graphics look cleaner, and even the font choices are way ahead of what GPT-5.6 Sol gave me. I’ll drop the exact prompt I used in the comments for anyone who wants to try it.

m0h

53,425 次观看 • 10 天前

Ox Alpha just beat GPT 5.6 Sol. It has everyone losing their minds. Ox Alpha one shotted this car game. Physics, controls, UI, single prompt. The frontend and game dev output coming out of this thing has been insanely impressive. Nobody knows who built it. My best guesses: Zhipu with an unreleased GLM, or ByteDance. The serving capacity is too massive for a small lab. Whoever it is needs to release this yesterday.

Ox Alpha just beat GPT 5.6 Sol. It has everyone losing their minds. Ox Alpha one shotted this car game. Physics, controls, UI, single prompt. The frontend and game dev output coming out of this thing has been insanely impressive. Nobody knows who built it. My best guesses: Zhipu with an unreleased GLM, or ByteDance. The serving capacity is too massive for a small lab. Whoever it is needs to release this yesterday.

BridgeMind

97,911 次观看 • 12 天前

Ox Alpha is behaving weirdly. I gave both of them 3 scenes to build. When the scene is something it's likely seen before, it generates nicely. Give it an unfamiliar scene, and it just doesn't understand it. Kimi K3 nailed all 3 and understood exactly what I was asking for.

Ox Alpha is behaving weirdly. I gave both of them 3 scenes to build. When the scene is something it's likely seen before, it generates nicely. Give it an unfamiliar scene, and it just doesn't understand it. Kimi K3 nailed all 3 and understood exactly what I was asking for.

Bhavy☄️

22,392 次观看 • 9 天前

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Pro (3/9) prompt: Build a premium interactive isometric 3D cozy room using Vite + React + Three.js (react-three-fiber/drei), with all objects modeled in code (no external assets) and subtle ambient animations. Gemini looks good on initial impression but I feel like I have way more to work with opus here (opus also did light/dark mode and took a quarter of the time to make it).

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Pro (3/9) prompt: Build a premium interactive isometric 3D cozy room using Vite + React + Three.js (react-three-fiber/drei), with all objects modeled in code (no external assets) and subtle ambient animations. Gemini looks good on initial impression but I feel like I have way more to work with opus here (opus also did light/dark mode and took a quarter of the time to make it).

Dev Ed

77,206 次观看 • 6 个月前

Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.2 everyone is praising Glm on my timeline, so i had to test it myself > both models were given the same prompt > GLM was super fast and used like 2% of my weekly limit > Opus took over 20 mins and used like 3% of weekly limits which one do you think won?

Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.2 everyone is praising Glm on my timeline, so i had to test it myself > both models were given the same prompt > GLM was super fast and used like 2% of my weekly limit > Opus took over 20 mins and used like 3% of weekly limits which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

48,130 次观看 • 2 个月前

UNREAL ENGINE 5 DEVS, THIS IS A MUST WATCH! As you guys know, I always try to bring the latest news and info for Unreal Engine 5. I found a plugin that allows you to CREATE BLUEPRINTS AND 3D MODELS INSIDE of Unreal Engine 5, this is not a sponsored video. Of course, I recommend using it as a helper and guide, not a robot that will do everything for you etc... enjoy! #LudusAI #ue5 #unrealengine #unrealengine5 #gamedev

UNREAL ENGINE 5 DEVS, THIS IS A MUST WATCH! As you guys know, I always try to bring the latest news and info for Unreal Engine 5. I found a plugin that allows you to CREATE BLUEPRINTS AND 3D MODELS INSIDE of Unreal Engine 5, this is not a sponsored video. Of course, I recommend using it as a helper and guide, not a robot that will do everything for you etc... enjoy! #LudusAI #ue5 #unrealengine #unrealengine5 #gamedev

Gorka Games

36,459 次观看 • 1 年前

CLAUDE SONNET 5 vs. CLAUDE OPUS 4.8 RESULTS Prompt: "build a single html landing page about claude sonnet 5, the new AI model that just dropped from Anthropic." Claude Sonnet 5: - Tokens Used: 20.9k input, 14.2k output - Total Cost: $3.36 - Time elapsed: 2m 11s Claude Opus 4.8 Ultracode: - Tokens Used: 96.3k input, 73.8k output - Total cost: $20.66 - Time Elapsed: 20m 15s I ran both of them in UltraCode mode via the CLI. I think in terms of quality of output, Opus won. In terms of model speed and cost, Sonnet 5 won. What are your thoughts? Comment down below who you think won!

CLAUDE SONNET 5 vs. CLAUDE OPUS 4.8 RESULTS Prompt: "build a single html landing page about claude sonnet 5, the new AI model that just dropped from Anthropic." Claude Sonnet 5: - Tokens Used: 20.9k input, 14.2k output - Total Cost: $3.36 - Time elapsed: 2m 11s Claude Opus 4.8 Ultracode: - Tokens Used: 96.3k input, 73.8k output - Total cost: $20.66 - Time Elapsed: 20m 15s I ran both of them in UltraCode mode via the CLI. I think in terms of quality of output, Opus won. In terms of model speed and cost, Sonnet 5 won. What are your thoughts? Comment down below who you think won!

Mark Santos

326,130 次观看 • 2 个月前

I applied Matt's prompt, ran it for a little over ten hours. About 1.3 million tokens on Opus 5. It created the game. I also made a video of it using Opus 5. Here's the video (and in my reply to this is a link to the actual game so you can play).

I applied Matt's prompt, ran it for a little over ten hours. About 1.3 million tokens on Opus 5. It created the game. I also made a video of it using Opus 5. Here's the video (and in my reply to this is a link to the actual game so you can play).

James Altucher

128,128 次观看 • 1 个月前

I’m blown away by the quality of the landing pages that Opus 5 can create in Three.js. Prompting it with "orbit using mouse" is enough to create a 3D parallax effect. The same goes for "add particles to pointer." It’s like creating a living, breathing world. More prompts I used: - Add a butterfly that flies to the branch and flies away when I mouse over it. - During the intro, first load a wireframe of the branches, similar to the field-scanning effect in Death Stranding. - Add a scan effect to the card images while they load. Then I asked it to use the shader buttons and nav bar I made in previous projects. As explained in my last video, I started with an inspiration and the prompt, “Recreate this in Three.js in a single HTML file. Self-verify until perfect.” Opus 5 ran for two hours. All the code is less than 1 MB. Inspiration: Let me know if I should open-source this.

I’m blown away by the quality of the landing pages that Opus 5 can create in Three.js. Prompting it with "orbit using mouse" is enough to create a 3D parallax effect. The same goes for "add particles to pointer." It’s like creating a living, breathing world. More prompts I used: - Add a butterfly that flies to the branch and flies away when I mouse over it. - During the intro, first load a wireframe of the branches, similar to the field-scanning effect in Death Stranding. - Add a scan effect to the card images while they load. Then I asked it to use the shader buttons and nav bar I made in previous projects. As explained in my last video, I started with an inspiration and the prompt, “Recreate this in Three.js in a single HTML file. Self-verify until perfect.” Opus 5 ran for two hours. All the code is less than 1 MB. Inspiration: Let me know if I should open-source this.

Meng To

522,784 次观看 • 17 天前

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini Pro 3.1 (7/9) I wanted to do a physics simulation test, overall both models did a good job in this department, however Opus added nice animations to things like "Fan", "Magnet" whilst gemini just rendered them out as a red circle. Opus also included way more effects in its toolbox, like rocket, connecting shapes with rope, springs etc. Should note that in all of these tests, Opus one shotted all of them, whilst gemini took an extra 3-5 prompts to get the project compile :) prompt: Build a polished physics sandbox toy using React + Vite with a real physics engine (Matter.js or Rapier), where users can spawn, grab, throw, and connect objects with springs, hinges, and ropes, plus interactive gadgets like fans and thrusters.

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini Pro 3.1 (7/9) I wanted to do a physics simulation test, overall both models did a good job in this department, however Opus added nice animations to things like "Fan", "Magnet" whilst gemini just rendered them out as a red circle. Opus also included way more effects in its toolbox, like rocket, connecting shapes with rope, springs etc. Should note that in all of these tests, Opus one shotted all of them, whilst gemini took an extra 3-5 prompts to get the project compile :) prompt: Build a polished physics sandbox toy using React + Vite with a real physics engine (Matter.js or Rapier), where users can spawn, grab, throw, and connect objects with springs, hinges, and ropes, plus interactive gadgets like fans and thrusters.

Dev Ed

28,179 次观看 • 6 个月前

Latest peek at MoonBase One, playable in the browser with Three.js. I started this project with Opus 5, and now Grok 4.6 has been improving visuals for 2 days using Matt Shumer's gauntlet loop. Hope this inspires others to shoot for the stars with what you can build with AI ha ;) Try it out here: (best on desktop)

Latest peek at MoonBase One, playable in the browser with Three.js. I started this project with Opus 5, and now Grok 4.6 has been improving visuals for 2 days using Matt Shumer's gauntlet loop. Hope this inspires others to shoot for the stars with what you can build with AI ha ;) Try it out here: (best on desktop)

Ryan Campbell

11,800 次观看 • 15 天前

No Three.js. No fake web-based depth-of-field or focal-length emulation. Customize in web, render in Blender. While everyone is vibe-coding apps for flat pattern generators, or at most Three.js-based 3D scenes, we’re already one step ahead. We built an app that lets you use a web UI to control an actual Blender 3D render. Eevee engine is used for streaming quick previews back into the app, while Cycles renders the final image for better material quality and lighting. So simple to use that you can even give it to your client. Of course, built with Toolcraft.

No Three.js. No fake web-based depth-of-field or focal-length emulation. Customize in web, render in Blender. While everyone is vibe-coding apps for flat pattern generators, or at most Three.js-based 3D scenes, we’re already one step ahead. We built an app that lets you use a web UI to control an actual Blender 3D render. Eevee engine is used for streaming quick previews back into the app, while Cycles renders the final image for better material quality and lighting. So simple to use that you can even give it to your client. Of course, built with Toolcraft.

Alex Barashkov

76,260 次观看 • 1 个月前

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

savip.

45,764 次观看 • 1 个月前

Everyone is using Fable 5 to build funny little demos so I decided to build something better. Vibe coded a 3D keyboard ecom platform in Three.js and GSAP. Every key. Every switch. Every color. Customizable in real time in 3D. It's really amusing that whole keyboard is built at runtime using Procedural geometry. To achieve that kind of realistic lighting on keyboard, it used a studio environment (gradient sky + softbox panels) rendered into a PMREM cubemap for realistic reflections. Opus helped a bit more here (as Fable was failing in loop in Claude chat) There is also custom GLSL shaders for RGB underflow/skirt and as well sRGB output encoding + explicit convertSRGBToLinear() on every material color so caps render at their exact swatch value. I don't know any of these techniques and concepts but I have had been reading how both Fable and Opus were trying to approach this by digging into their "thinking" phase. Go try it, there is a cool Claude theme keyboard you would want to purchase too :D Live: Code:

Everyone is using Fable 5 to build funny little demos so I decided to build something better. Vibe coded a 3D keyboard ecom platform in Three.js and GSAP. Every key. Every switch. Every color. Customizable in real time in 3D. It's really amusing that whole keyboard is built at runtime using Procedural geometry. To achieve that kind of realistic lighting on keyboard, it used a studio environment (gradient sky + softbox panels) rendered into a PMREM cubemap for realistic reflections. Opus helped a bit more here (as Fable was failing in loop in Claude chat) There is also custom GLSL shaders for RGB underflow/skirt and as well sRGB output encoding + explicit convertSRGBToLinear() on every material color so caps render at their exact swatch value. I don't know any of these techniques and concepts but I have had been reading how both Fable and Opus were trying to approach this by digging into their "thinking" phase. Go try it, there is a cool Claude theme keyboard you would want to purchase too :D Live: Code:

The Bugged Dev

98,323 次观看 • 2 个月前

Claude Fable 5 makes new things possible. I one shot a full horror game with it. One prompt. I have never seen AI output a game like this. This is the leap I've been waiting for. 80.3 on SWE-Bench Pro vs Opus 4.8 at 69.2, the biggest jump I have ever seen on that benchmark. It passed GPT 5.5 in both coding and intelligence on Artificial Analysis. I already canceled my $200 ChatGPT Pro plan. It fixed a Bridge Voice bug in one shot that GPT 5.5, Opus 4.7, and Opus 4.8 all failed to crack for 2 months. 10/10. Best model I have ever used. Full review below.

Claude Fable 5 makes new things possible. I one shot a full horror game with it. One prompt. I have never seen AI output a game like this. This is the leap I've been waiting for. 80.3 on SWE-Bench Pro vs Opus 4.8 at 69.2, the biggest jump I have ever seen on that benchmark. It passed GPT 5.5 in both coding and intelligence on Artificial Analysis. I already canceled my $200 ChatGPT Pro plan. It fixed a Bridge Voice bug in one shot that GPT 5.5, Opus 4.7, and Opus 4.8 all failed to crack for 2 months. 10/10. Best model I have ever used. Full review below.

BridgeMind

19,020 次观看 • 2 个月前

This is my new opensource project with WEBGL2 & Three.js , my goal was to build a third person template of a samurai, so I built 3 techniques ( using the katana ) & 3 magic abilities which are fully procedural. katana fire made of a real raymarched volume, ragdoll with no physics engine, Skeleton was done in mixamo so that it's easy to swap character & a character editor. A lot of manual work done & I used Opus 5 Anthropic help to speed up my vision. Live link: Source code:

This is my new opensource project with WEBGL2 & Three.js , my goal was to build a third person template of a samurai, so I built 3 techniques ( using the katana ) & 3 magic abilities which are fully procedural. katana fire made of a real raymarched volume, ragdoll with no physics engine, Skeleton was done in mixamo so that it's easy to swap character & a character editor. A lot of manual work done & I used Opus 5 Anthropic help to speed up my vision. Live link: Source code:

Chiro Visuals

45,580 次观看 • 17 天前