Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Pandey rightly points out that Vijay’s calm, moderate approach to problems is resonating strongly with people, and it’s clearly working. Look at the Panaiyur office incident: After 10,000+ nomination interest forms were issued on Day 1, crowds kept growing and locals raised concerns. What did Vijay do? No ego.... show more

Navaneeth

2,026 subscribers

72,755 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel “You need to spend a lot of time focusing people. This is something I learned from Peter Thiel. He used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it’s insulting to be asked to do just one thing, but Peter would enforce this pretty strictly.” Thiel would say: “I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I’ve assigned to you. I don’t want to hear about how great your doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.” Keith explains: “The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they’re difficult—you don’t wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate… If you have a company that’s always solving B+ problems, you’ll grow and add value, but you’ll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it.” Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel “You need to spend a lot of time focusing people. This is something I learned from Peter Thiel. He used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it’s insulting to be asked to do just one thing, but Peter would enforce this pretty strictly.” Thiel would say: “I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I’ve assigned to you. I don’t want to hear about how great your doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.” Keith explains: “The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they’re difficult—you don’t wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate… If you have a company that’s always solving B+ problems, you’ll grow and add value, but you’ll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it.” Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Startup Archive

81,796 views • 1 year ago

BREAKING:🚨 TRUMP DEMANDS ACTION: "WE HAVE TO ACT FAST!" Reporter: “Are you criticizing Pam Bondi for not going after your political adversaries?” President Trump: “No, I just want people to act. They have to act, and we want to act fast. You know, they were ruthless and vicious. I was impeached twice. I was indicted five times. It turned out to be a fake deal. And we have to act fast! One way or the other. One way or the other. They’re guilty, they’re not guilty, we have to act fast. If they’re not guilty, that’s fine. If they are guilty, or if they should be charged, they should be charged. And we have to do it now.” This is Trump at his most direct — no games, no delays. The message is clear: justice must be swift, decisive, and fair — NOW.

BREAKING:🚨 TRUMP DEMANDS ACTION: "WE HAVE TO ACT FAST!" Reporter: “Are you criticizing Pam Bondi for not going after your political adversaries?” President Trump: “No, I just want people to act. They have to act, and we want to act fast. You know, they were ruthless and vicious. I was impeached twice. I was indicted five times. It turned out to be a fake deal. And we have to act fast! One way or the other. One way or the other. They’re guilty, they’re not guilty, we have to act fast. If they’re not guilty, that’s fine. If they are guilty, or if they should be charged, they should be charged. And we have to do it now.” This is Trump at his most direct — no games, no delays. The message is clear: justice must be swift, decisive, and fair — NOW.

Jim Ferguson

24,010 views • 10 months ago

Robert de Niro, "Trump doesn't understand humanity.. He has no empathy.. He wants to hurt this country.. To hurt people" "What upsets me the most is that people follow him" "And they kiss his ass and look up to him" "I don't understand the people, in his cabinet, how they can live with themselves after what they've allowed him to do" "Or even walk out of the room after what they did with Zelenskyy the first time" "If Rubio had balls he would have walked out"

Robert de Niro, "Trump doesn't understand humanity.. He has no empathy.. He wants to hurt this country.. To hurt people" "What upsets me the most is that people follow him" "And they kiss his ass and look up to him" "I don't understand the people, in his cabinet, how they can live with themselves after what they've allowed him to do" "Or even walk out of the room after what they did with Zelenskyy the first time" "If Rubio had balls he would have walked out"

Farrukh

322,173 views • 8 months ago

Paul Pierce on Shams Charania report on Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown personal relationship: “Come on, man. What news? This is actually news. Did Shaq and Kobe hang out, get along? Did Mike and Scottie? Man, people live different lifestyles. That’s what you got to understand. Everybody just because they look like they got the best relationship and the chemistry on the court don’t mean that’s what it’s gonna equal off the court. You know what I’m sayin? Some people got families. Some people are into different things off on their free time. It’s like, all right, that’s cool and that’s okay if they didn’t hang out or communicate. Did we hear about any like scuffles?” (Via No Fouls Given)

Paul Pierce on Shams Charania report on Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown personal relationship: “Come on, man. What news? This is actually news. Did Shaq and Kobe hang out, get along? Did Mike and Scottie? Man, people live different lifestyles. That’s what you got to understand. Everybody just because they look like they got the best relationship and the chemistry on the court don’t mean that’s what it’s gonna equal off the court. You know what I’m sayin? Some people got families. Some people are into different things off on their free time. It’s like, all right, that’s cool and that’s okay if they didn’t hang out or communicate. Did we hear about any like scuffles?” (Via No Fouls Given)

NBA Courtside

418,483 views • 16 days ago

Tyler, the Creator on how he feels about Timothée Chalamet’s confidence: “I hope he continues to feel that way about himself. I think people are intimidated when other people feel so good and confident about themselves, because they don’t know what that feeling is like. So that’s why they be like, ‘You better be humble,’—because they want you to feel how they might feel when they look in the mirror. And it’s like, ‘No, baby, some people actually love and like themselves and what they do.’”

Tyler, the Creator on how he feels about Timothée Chalamet’s confidence: “I hope he continues to feel that way about himself. I think people are intimidated when other people feel so good and confident about themselves, because they don’t know what that feeling is like. So that’s why they be like, ‘You better be humble,’—because they want you to feel how they might feel when they look in the mirror. And it’s like, ‘No, baby, some people actually love and like themselves and what they do.’”

Timothée Nation

1,430,443 views • 7 months ago

Randi Weingarten is screaming again... this time at a No Kings rally in Minnesota. "I know the hour is late, but this has been an amazing crowd... why do we say no kings? Because the only way the government acts for the people, listens to the people, responds to the people, solves the people's problems, is if it is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. That's why, that's why standing up and showing up, being in solidarity like millions of us are doing today is so important. It is the only way we can get the government to act in our interest, act in our kids' interest, act in working people's interest." Reminder: Randi kicked kids out of the classroom nationwide during COVID resulting in MASSIVE learning loss

Randi Weingarten is screaming again... this time at a No Kings rally in Minnesota. "I know the hour is late, but this has been an amazing crowd... why do we say no kings? Because the only way the government acts for the people, listens to the people, responds to the people, solves the people's problems, is if it is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. That's why, that's why standing up and showing up, being in solidarity like millions of us are doing today is so important. It is the only way we can get the government to act in our interest, act in our kids' interest, act in working people's interest." Reminder: Randi kicked kids out of the classroom nationwide during COVID resulting in MASSIVE learning loss

Steve Guest

71,905 views • 3 months ago

Naval Ravikant on the importance of hiring high-agency people Naval defines agency as: “People who just solve problems without even being asked to solve the problem—they identify the problem, they go solve it, they don’t even necessarily have to update you every step of the way, they’re not asking silly questions, and they’re just coming up with solutions.” He believes this is important because “building a startup is an infinite set of problems that are being thrown at you.” And there comes a day where you can’t even look at every problem your company is facing—let alone solve every one of them. He cites the Vinod Khosla aphorism: "The team you build is the company you build, not the plan you make.” And your ability to solve problems is based entirely on how many problem-solvers you have at your company. As Naval puts it: “If you have somebody who takes 10% of your time and management to solve problems, you can only have 10 of those people working with you. But if somebody takes 5%, you can have 20 of those people.” When building Airchat and AngelList, he thought of each team as a Navy Seal team: “Everyone is just really good at what they do. They know their job. They do it. They don’t complain. They’re not egotistical about it. And if they have to constantly be corrected, led around by the nose, you have to clean up after them, or you question their judgement, it’s not going to work out.”

Naval Ravikant on the importance of hiring high-agency people Naval defines agency as: “People who just solve problems without even being asked to solve the problem—they identify the problem, they go solve it, they don’t even necessarily have to update you every step of the way, they’re not asking silly questions, and they’re just coming up with solutions.” He believes this is important because “building a startup is an infinite set of problems that are being thrown at you.” And there comes a day where you can’t even look at every problem your company is facing—let alone solve every one of them. He cites the Vinod Khosla aphorism: "The team you build is the company you build, not the plan you make.” And your ability to solve problems is based entirely on how many problem-solvers you have at your company. As Naval puts it: “If you have somebody who takes 10% of your time and management to solve problems, you can only have 10 of those people working with you. But if somebody takes 5%, you can have 20 of those people.” When building Airchat and AngelList, he thought of each team as a Navy Seal team: “Everyone is just really good at what they do. They know their job. They do it. They don’t complain. They’re not egotistical about it. And if they have to constantly be corrected, led around by the nose, you have to clean up after them, or you question their judgement, it’s not going to work out.”

Startup Archive

552,782 views • 2 years ago

Tucker Carlson says he’s officially done supporting the Republican Party after 35 years. Listen closely to how he ends it. That’s not a man quitting. That’s a man counting. “There’s no chance I would support the Republican Party. Not going to support the Democratic Party. I don’t know what I’m going to do.” “How could I, or any American voters, support a political party that’s not loyal to the United States, that puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens?” “It’s not possible to vote for people like that. And I’m not going to.” “I’ve been a consistent defender for 35 years of the Republican Party. I mean, very consistent defender. But there’s no defending this because it’s immoral.” “And it’s exactly the opposite of what a political party in a democracy is charged with doing, which is representing its own voters, its own citizens, its own nation. And they’re not doing that.” “So, no, I’m out. And if I’m out, then I think a lot of other people are out.”

Tucker Carlson says he’s officially done supporting the Republican Party after 35 years. Listen closely to how he ends it. That’s not a man quitting. That’s a man counting. “There’s no chance I would support the Republican Party. Not going to support the Democratic Party. I don’t know what I’m going to do.” “How could I, or any American voters, support a political party that’s not loyal to the United States, that puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens?” “It’s not possible to vote for people like that. And I’m not going to.” “I’ve been a consistent defender for 35 years of the Republican Party. I mean, very consistent defender. But there’s no defending this because it’s immoral.” “And it’s exactly the opposite of what a political party in a democracy is charged with doing, which is representing its own voters, its own citizens, its own nation. And they’re not doing that.” “So, no, I’m out. And if I’m out, then I think a lot of other people are out.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,021,136 views • 1 month ago

Kamala Harris goes on a bizarre rant about the “light inside people” during her appearance on The View. What on earth is she talking about? Harris has clearly learned nothing from her brutal election loss...when she failed to connect with everyday Americans. Word salad like this is exactly why no one took her seriously then...and still don’t now. “And I do believe that moving forward we’re going to remember that the power ultimately is with the people and we have to remind folks that they cannot let their light and their spirit be diminished by who happens to be in the Oval Office at this moment.” “And that’s part of what I hope to achieve with the book is to remind us, people by the tens of thousands for those of you who were there came to those events with such enthusiasm and optimism and dare I say joy….” “About the possibilities for our country and that light is inside people.” “It’s there and it cannot be diminished or extinguished by an election or an individual and we have to remember that. That light is inside us, and it’s inside each of us and we have to see it in each other and let that guide us through this very dark time.”

Kamala Harris goes on a bizarre rant about the “light inside people” during her appearance on The View. What on earth is she talking about? Harris has clearly learned nothing from her brutal election loss...when she failed to connect with everyday Americans. Word salad like this is exactly why no one took her seriously then...and still don’t now. “And I do believe that moving forward we’re going to remember that the power ultimately is with the people and we have to remind folks that they cannot let their light and their spirit be diminished by who happens to be in the Oval Office at this moment.” “And that’s part of what I hope to achieve with the book is to remind us, people by the tens of thousands for those of you who were there came to those events with such enthusiasm and optimism and dare I say joy….” “About the possibilities for our country and that light is inside people.” “It’s there and it cannot be diminished or extinguished by an election or an individual and we have to remember that. That light is inside us, and it’s inside each of us and we have to see it in each other and let that guide us through this very dark time.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

54,055 views • 10 months ago

“Mr. putin would realise that he is facing big, big problems.” - Mikhail Kasyanov, former Russian Prime Minister. Mikhail Kasyanov: “We shouldn’t expect in the foreseeable future any social unrest which would change the regime. No, this scenario doesn’t exist for upcoming for foreseeable future. But what I see just having this counting all these aspects that by the end of the year if the west takes consistent position, principal position and will recognise finally, not only European leaders but also US administration, that who is aggressor and who is the victim. That’s not two guys just who hate each other and that’s why they fight each other and then we should press both of them to sit down and negotiate. Interviewer: But we haven’t heard that. We haven’t heard that from the United States. Mikhail Kasyanov: We haven’t, we haven’t heard but Marco Rubio already said we just on the Ukrainian side. We’re not mediator because we provide just our equipment. Interviewer: Do we need to hear that? Mikhail Kasyanov: That’s why we are in this way. We need US administration to make a strong statement on that. We need to hear from the President United States. Interviewer: Exactly. They’re the aggressor, they’re the victim. Do you think we’ll ever hear it? Mikhail Kasyanov: Absolutely. Absolutely. That’s coming to this and a discussion in Ankara that’s already close to this. Interviewer: You’re seeing that shift. Mikhail Kasyanov: That’s shifting, that’s already taking place. That is one aspect, all others as well. And that’s why Mr. putin would realise that he is facing big, big problems and there is no hope that President Trump would help him. There is no hope that the economy will start grow or at least will stand at this stage and there is no hope that he can draw just more people to the battlefield. It means he will be willing to negotiate.” (CNN)

“Mr. putin would realise that he is facing big, big problems.” - Mikhail Kasyanov, former Russian Prime Minister. Mikhail Kasyanov: “We shouldn’t expect in the foreseeable future any social unrest which would change the regime. No, this scenario doesn’t exist for upcoming for foreseeable future. But what I see just having this counting all these aspects that by the end of the year if the west takes consistent position, principal position and will recognise finally, not only European leaders but also US administration, that who is aggressor and who is the victim. That’s not two guys just who hate each other and that’s why they fight each other and then we should press both of them to sit down and negotiate. Interviewer: But we haven’t heard that. We haven’t heard that from the United States. Mikhail Kasyanov: We haven’t, we haven’t heard but Marco Rubio already said we just on the Ukrainian side. We’re not mediator because we provide just our equipment. Interviewer: Do we need to hear that? Mikhail Kasyanov: That’s why we are in this way. We need US administration to make a strong statement on that. We need to hear from the President United States. Interviewer: Exactly. They’re the aggressor, they’re the victim. Do you think we’ll ever hear it? Mikhail Kasyanov: Absolutely. Absolutely. That’s coming to this and a discussion in Ankara that’s already close to this. Interviewer: You’re seeing that shift. Mikhail Kasyanov: That’s shifting, that’s already taking place. That is one aspect, all others as well. And that’s why Mr. putin would realise that he is facing big, big problems and there is no hope that President Trump would help him. There is no hope that the economy will start grow or at least will stand at this stage and there is no hope that he can draw just more people to the battlefield. It means he will be willing to negotiate.” (CNN)

Yasmina

53,884 views • 5 days ago

On Focus: “I don’t give a fuck what anyone thinks. When you’re a racehorse, the reason they put blinders on these things is because if you look at the horse on the left or the horse on the right, you’re going to miss a step. That’s why those horses have fucking blinders on. And that’s what people should have. When you’re running after something you should not look left and right. What does this person think? What does that person think? No. Go!”

On Focus: “I don’t give a fuck what anyone thinks. When you’re a racehorse, the reason they put blinders on these things is because if you look at the horse on the left or the horse on the right, you’re going to miss a step. That’s why those horses have fucking blinders on. And that’s what people should have. When you’re running after something you should not look left and right. What does this person think? What does that person think? No. Go!”

David Senra

55,206 views • 1 year ago

Ansem explains why he decided to create MarketBubble with Banks “I love markets and I love the internet. I’ve made nearly all of my money being early to trends and predicting them before they happen” “That’s the main thing I want to do on this show. I want to look at where the internet is going, look at where markets are going, look at what I’m researching and be able to share that information” “The only reason I was able to learn how to trade online is because there were a ton of people who were really important in my learning process like Cobie and Trader Mayne” “It’s really important for me to have this platform and be able to do that for other people and share that”

Ansem explains why he decided to create MarketBubble with Banks “I love markets and I love the internet. I’ve made nearly all of my money being early to trends and predicting them before they happen” “That’s the main thing I want to do on this show. I want to look at where the internet is going, look at where markets are going, look at what I’m researching and be able to share that information” “The only reason I was able to learn how to trade online is because there were a ton of people who were really important in my learning process like Cobie and Trader Mayne” “It’s really important for me to have this platform and be able to do that for other people and share that”

Jack

94,298 views • 2 months ago

This gentleman was out for a ride o. This sunny day, his bike started to overheat so he decided to pull over and let it cool. As he sat on the bridge he kept hearing people honk at him and screaming don’t do it. The police even showed up, turns out people were reporting him because they thought he was going to jump. If you saw someone sitting there on the highway would you think that’s what he was doing?

This gentleman was out for a ride o. This sunny day, his bike started to overheat so he decided to pull over and let it cool. As he sat on the bridge he kept hearing people honk at him and screaming don’t do it. The police even showed up, turns out people were reporting him because they thought he was going to jump. If you saw someone sitting there on the highway would you think that’s what he was doing?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

143,553 views • 4 months ago

🚨 LMFAO! REPORTER: Do policies like no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, show that the Democrat Party is no longer the party of the working class and the Republican Party under your leadership? PRESIDENT TRUMP: "I love this question. This is the greatest. Look how handsome he is. What a great guy he is. Yes, the Democrats don't know what they're doing!" "They want to tax everybody out of business. They want men playing in women's sports. They don't want voter ID. They don't know what they're doing."

🚨 LMFAO! REPORTER: Do policies like no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, show that the Democrat Party is no longer the party of the working class and the Republican Party under your leadership? PRESIDENT TRUMP: "I love this question. This is the greatest. Look how handsome he is. What a great guy he is. Yes, the Democrats don't know what they're doing!" "They want to tax everybody out of business. They want men playing in women's sports. They don't want voter ID. They don't know what they're doing."

Eric Daugherty

141,604 views • 3 months ago

What’s going on with Trump right now is exactly what the 25th Amendment is for. Watch this report closely with that in mind. Path is simple: The VP and a majority of the Cabinet invoke the 25th Amendment, declare the president unable to discharge the duties of the office, which is plainly obvious, and transfer power immediately. No hearings. No waiting for the next election. Now. If they won’t act after this, they’re not believers, they’re complicit. That’s an abdication of duty to the Constitution and to the country.

What’s going on with Trump right now is exactly what the 25th Amendment is for. Watch this report closely with that in mind. Path is simple: The VP and a majority of the Cabinet invoke the 25th Amendment, declare the president unable to discharge the duties of the office, which is plainly obvious, and transfer power immediately. No hearings. No waiting for the next election. Now. If they won’t act after this, they’re not believers, they’re complicit. That’s an abdication of duty to the Constitution and to the country.

Christopher Webb

115,479 views • 3 months ago

I’d like to point out that this is the problem with far too many politicians today, they disregard The Will of the people. Why should Danielle denounce what the people want? That’s not her place to do so. The same thing went on during the Freedom Convoy. Elected officials shouldn’t be there to denounce the voices of their citizens. They should be listening to them, and that’s why Alberta is in the situation that they are. No one from Ottawa listened.

I’d like to point out that this is the problem with far too many politicians today, they disregard The Will of the people. Why should Danielle denounce what the people want? That’s not her place to do so. The same thing went on during the Freedom Convoy. Elected officials shouldn’t be there to denounce the voices of their citizens. They should be listening to them, and that’s why Alberta is in the situation that they are. No one from Ottawa listened.

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

58,257 views • 2 months ago

🚨CMSGT. Dennis Fritz: Will China🇨🇳 use US🇺🇸 war on Iran as an opportunity to RETAKE Taiwan with military force? ‘China does not want war with Taiwan. They want to bring it peacefully. That’s rhetoric on our part, you know, to say: “Hey, China is looking, this is going to give them the opportunity to take over Taiwan.” That’s just disinformation on our part. When is the last time China has invaded anyone? They want to handle that peacefully and want us out of that. It’s just like if Texas decided to secede. We wouldn’t want anybody else in our business. We would try to make sure they don’t do that. And that’s what China considers internal. They do not interfere with others’ business, and that’s what they want from us in regard to Taiwan. So no, I don’t think this is an opportunity where China would take advantage and say, “Okay, this is our time.” I think the only way they would do that is if Taiwan decided they were going to absolutely secede and we supported that. Then I think that would cause a war. But I don’t think they’ll just arbitrarily decide that they’re going to pre-empt and go into Taiwan.’ Watch the full interview below in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

🚨CMSGT. Dennis Fritz: Will China🇨🇳 use US🇺🇸 war on Iran as an opportunity to RETAKE Taiwan with military force? ‘China does not want war with Taiwan. They want to bring it peacefully. That’s rhetoric on our part, you know, to say: “Hey, China is looking, this is going to give them the opportunity to take over Taiwan.” That’s just disinformation on our part. When is the last time China has invaded anyone? They want to handle that peacefully and want us out of that. It’s just like if Texas decided to secede. We wouldn’t want anybody else in our business. We would try to make sure they don’t do that. And that’s what China considers internal. They do not interfere with others’ business, and that’s what they want from us in regard to Taiwan. So no, I don’t think this is an opportunity where China would take advantage and say, “Okay, this is our time.” I think the only way they would do that is if Taiwan decided they were going to absolutely secede and we supported that. Then I think that would cause a war. But I don’t think they’ll just arbitrarily decide that they’re going to pre-empt and go into Taiwan.’ Watch the full interview below in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

154,869 views • 5 months ago

PabloReports: Why do you think no one is showing up to Trump’s party on the National Mall? Magaziner: I don’t know. Because it’s not good? This is just a real missed opportunity. Instead, because Trump is who he is and only cares about himself and wants to be constantly feeding his own ego, he put together this shitty event that no one is at. You see the clips on Fox about how great it is, and behind them it’s like an empty field.

PabloReports: Why do you think no one is showing up to Trump’s party on the National Mall? Magaziner: I don’t know. Because it’s not good? This is just a real missed opportunity. Instead, because Trump is who he is and only cares about himself and wants to be constantly feeding his own ego, he put together this shitty event that no one is at. You see the clips on Fox about how great it is, and behind them it’s like an empty field.

Acyn

84,193 views • 24 days ago

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel "Peter Thiel used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it's insulting to be asked to do just one thing. But Peter would enforce this pretty strictly. He'd basically say: 'I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I've assigned to you. I don't want to hear about how great you're doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.'... The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they're difficult--you don't wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate... If you have a company that's always solving B+ problems, you'll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it" Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel "Peter Thiel used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it's insulting to be asked to do just one thing. But Peter would enforce this pretty strictly. He'd basically say: 'I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I've assigned to you. I don't want to hear about how great you're doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.'... The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they're difficult--you don't wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate... If you have a company that's always solving B+ problems, you'll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it" Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Startup Archive

108,875 views • 1 year ago