Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

People are getting taller. Brains are getting smaller. Average height has climbed decade after decade — driven by higher protein intake. But brain volume tells a different story. We evolved from a chimpanzee brain of roughly 350cc — about the size of your fist — to 1,650cc at our... peak 30,000 years ago. Today we sit at 1,330cc. We've lost almost a chimp brain's worth of volume. And IQ has been declining since 1950. Between 2005 and 2010, five major European public health audits showed brain disorders had become the #1 cost to society. Rising from €386 billion to €789 billion in just five years. Nobody acted. Professor Michael Crawford has spent 50 years studying why. 300+ papers. 95 years old. Still publishing. Still doing podcasts. Still sharp. He remembers that before WWII, the UK served a fish course before the meat course or herring for breakfast. In Elizabeth I's time — roughly 50% of English income came from cod fleets off Newfoundland. Factory workers complained about too much salmon for lunch. East End pubs served free oysters with beer. New York City was once an oyster capital. And even during World War II, when almost everything else was rationed, seafood wasn’t. Every pregnant mother received cod liver oil, orange juice and milk — delivered free by the milkman to her doorstep. 95% of infants were breastfed. The government understood maternal DHA nutrition during the war. Then abandoned it entirely. Fish consumption declined quietly in the decades that followed — pollution, industrialisation, changing food culture. Seafood went from a working class staple to luxury item. And almost nobody noticed — because we were told to track protein intake. But no one told you to track DHA intake. Even chicken — the modern “healthy protein” — has been affected. DHA content of chicken meat dropped from 170mg per 100g in the 1970s to just 13mg today. Chickens used to roam fields eating grubs and green food. Now they’re fed corn. No DHA precursor. The food system changed the nutritional profile of an entire protein source without telling anyone. And here's the problem with that: Your brain isn't built from protein. It's built from specialised fats. Specifically DHA — docosahexaenoic acid — an omega-3 found almost exclusively in seafood. Every mammal maintains a tight omega-6 (ARA) to omega-3 (DHA) ratio of roughly 2:1 or 1:1. Human breast milk is low protein and loaded with DHA. Nature makes the priority obvious. The marine evidence is hard to ignore. A dolphin has 1,700cc cranial capacity. A lion — similar body size — has 340cc. Same body weight. Five times the brain volume. The only difference: the dolphin returned to the sea 50 million years ago. And the human fossil record supports it too. Homo heidelbergensis lived inland. Fish-poor diet. Average brain volume: ~1,100cc. Coastal Homo sapiens eating shellfish — living at the water's edge — reached 1,550–1,660cc. The biggest brains ever recorded in human history. Seafood eaters built larger, more complex brains. And you can't just eat more flax seeds. Crawford proved this biochemically. The ability to convert plant-based omega-3s into DHA is rate-limited — it's a very slow process. As body size increases, the velocity of growth outstrips the biosynthetic capacity. This is why every land-based mammal without exception loses brain capacity as it gets bigger. Squirrels: 2.5% brain to body ratio. Rhinoceros: 0.1%. The land food base simply cannot supply DHA fast enough for large mammals. And DHA isn't just a structural fat. Inside cell membranes it behaves as a semiconducting, UV-absorbing chromophore. Its structure enabled early photoreceptors to convert light into electrical signals — the beginning of the nervous system itself. Your retina uses it. Your synapses use it. Your vision depends on it. Crawford: DHA was so effective for neural signalling that evolution never replaced it. Genomes shifted across millions of years. DHA didn't. In this rare case — the molecule dictated to the DNA. At 95 — Crawford eats seafood five times a week. He is his own proof of concept. No nootropic fixes a structural deficiency in the primary building block of your brain. My playbook: - Seafood five times a week - Oysters once — highest mineral load - Sardines four times - Salmon when available Spend less on supplements. Invest in seafood. Your brain isn't asking for more protein. It's asking for the fat it's built from.show more

no.mind

29,238 subscribers

13,643 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The Alzheimer's Shield is REAL. And it's being ignored. New research reveals a staggering 73% of Alzheimer's cases could be PREVENTED. The key? A powerful nutritional synergy that mainstream medicine is overlooking. Here's the game-changing discovery👇 1. The Brain Shrinkage Crisis Your brain is literally SHRINKING. Why? Omega-3 levels have crashed. These fats are so vital, the more Omega-3 you have, the more physical brain matter you have. It's the foundation of cognition. 2. The "SMASH" Protocol You can't reverse the trend without the right fuel. The solution? SMASH it: - Salmon - Mackerel - Anchovies - Sardines - Herring These oily fish are your brain's best defense. 3. The Critical Co-Factor You're Missing But here's the plot twist Omega-3s are NOT a solo act. Oxford University researchers made a landmark discovery: Omega-3s and B vitamins are an inseparable duo. One DOES NOT work without the other. B12, critical for brain health and found in meat/fish/eggs, is poorly absorbed as we age. Vegans are at extreme risk with ZERO natural B12. 4. The 73% Reduction Protocol The Oxford study gave B vitamins to people with pre-dementia. The results were explosive, but ONLY in those with sufficient Omega-3. In this group, brain shrinkage was slashed by 73% in just one year. Let that sink in. Alzheimer's is brain shrinkage. They found a way to stop it. The Bottom Line: You must address BOTH. - No Omega-3? Your B vitamins can't do their job. - No B Vitamins? Your Omega-3 is ineffective. This is the powerful, synergistic shield your brain needs. It's not just about one pill or one food. It's about the alliance. Share this vital information. It could save a mind.

The Alzheimer's Shield is REAL. And it's being ignored. New research reveals a staggering 73% of Alzheimer's cases could be PREVENTED. The key? A powerful nutritional synergy that mainstream medicine is overlooking. Here's the game-changing discovery👇 1. The Brain Shrinkage Crisis Your brain is literally SHRINKING. Why? Omega-3 levels have crashed. These fats are so vital, the more Omega-3 you have, the more physical brain matter you have. It's the foundation of cognition. 2. The "SMASH" Protocol You can't reverse the trend without the right fuel. The solution? SMASH it: - Salmon - Mackerel - Anchovies - Sardines - Herring These oily fish are your brain's best defense. 3. The Critical Co-Factor You're Missing But here's the plot twist Omega-3s are NOT a solo act. Oxford University researchers made a landmark discovery: Omega-3s and B vitamins are an inseparable duo. One DOES NOT work without the other. B12, critical for brain health and found in meat/fish/eggs, is poorly absorbed as we age. Vegans are at extreme risk with ZERO natural B12. 4. The 73% Reduction Protocol The Oxford study gave B vitamins to people with pre-dementia. The results were explosive, but ONLY in those with sufficient Omega-3. In this group, brain shrinkage was slashed by 73% in just one year. Let that sink in. Alzheimer's is brain shrinkage. They found a way to stop it. The Bottom Line: You must address BOTH. - No Omega-3? Your B vitamins can't do their job. - No B Vitamins? Your Omega-3 is ineffective. This is the powerful, synergistic shield your brain needs. It's not just about one pill or one food. It's about the alliance. Share this vital information. It could save a mind.

Camus

176,103 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

"Vegetarians Have Smaller Brains. The Less A Human Eats Meat, Then The Smaller The Brain Becomes." Dr Ben Bikman, PhD "The Brain Is So Dependent On The Nutrients From Animal Sourced Foods That It Will Suffer When It Doesn't Get Them...Depriving The Brain Of What It Needs." Controversial...yet true. Oxford University performed a 5 year study on the brain. Over the course of a 5 year period, those who ate a meat-free diet were found to be suffering from 6X the rate of brain shrinkage compared to those who consumed animal sourced foods. 10 Crucial Nutrients ONLY Found In Animal Sourced Foods: 1⃣ Vitamin A (Retinol): A fat-soluble vitamin needed for hormone health, vision, and physical development. It helps: Vision, physical development, immune function, and hormones. A deficiency can look like: Hair loss, skin issues, vision impairments, and more prone to infections. Foods High in Retinol: Beef liver, lamb liver & cod liver oil. 2⃣ Vitamin B12: A water-soluble vitamin that helps convert food into energy. It helps: Development & function of the central nervous system. A deficiency can look like: Neurological disorders, mood disorders, mental illness, psychosis, an increased risk of Alzheimer's & chronic fatigue. Foods High in B12: Beef liver, beef & feta cheese. 3⃣ Carnosine: A molecule found throughout the body, especially in the brain, gastrointestinal tissues & vertebrae. It helps: Muscular strength & athletic endurance. A deficiency can look like: Decreased muscle tone, neurological tremors & developmental delays. Foods High in Carnosine: Chicken, beef & pork. 4⃣ Creatine: An amino acid found in the muscles & brain. It helps: Muscular strength & athletic endurance. A deficiency can look like: Movement disorders & developmental delays. Foods High in Creatine: Beef, chicken & salmon. 5⃣ Carnitine: An amino acid found in almost every body cell. It helps: Athletic endurance, cognitive function & energy production. A deficiency can look like: Muscle weakness & chronic fatigue. Foods High in Creatine: Beef & pork. 6⃣ Vitamin D3: A fat-soluble vitamin that helps your body absorb calcium & phosphorus. It helps: Improves mood, reduces inflammation & boosts the immune system. A deficiency can look like: Mood disorders, neurological disorders & autoimmune diseases. Foods High in D3: Beef organs, egg yolks & getting your regular dose of the sun! 7⃣ DHA (Docosahexaenoic Acid): An omega-3 fatty acid found in the brain, skin & retina. It helps: Healthy brain function, eyes & nerve tissue. A deficiency can look like: Mental health disorders & developmental disorders in children. Foods High in DHA: Beef & eggs. 8⃣ EPA (Eicosapentaenoic acid): An omega-3 fatty acid found in the brain, skin & retina. It helps: Decreased blood clots, reduces inflammation & reduces high blood pressure. A deficiency can look like: Chronic pain & fatigue. Foods High in EPA: Beef & full-fat dairy. 9⃣ Heme Iron: A form of iron found in the blood & muscles. It helps: Blood health A deficiency can look like: Anemia, depression, hair loss & chronic fatigue. Foods High in Heme Iron: Beef, liver & oysters. 🔟Taurine: An amino acid found in the brain, eyes, heart & muscles. It helps: Athletic endurance & recovery. A deficiency can look like: Cardiovascular problems. Foods High in Taurine: Beef & dairy. 👇Nutritional Role Of Meat In The Human Diet👇 👇Brain Volume Loss Caused By B12 Deficiency👇 👇Why Vegans Have Smaller Brains👇 Speaker: Dr Ben Bikman & Steven Bartlett Podcast: Steven Bartlett DiaryOfaCEO

"Vegetarians Have Smaller Brains. The Less A Human Eats Meat, Then The Smaller The Brain Becomes." Dr Ben Bikman, PhD "The Brain Is So Dependent On The Nutrients From Animal Sourced Foods That It Will Suffer When It Doesn't Get Them...Depriving The Brain Of What It Needs." Controversial...yet true. Oxford University performed a 5 year study on the brain. Over the course of a 5 year period, those who ate a meat-free diet were found to be suffering from 6X the rate of brain shrinkage compared to those who consumed animal sourced foods. 10 Crucial Nutrients ONLY Found In Animal Sourced Foods: 1⃣ Vitamin A (Retinol): A fat-soluble vitamin needed for hormone health, vision, and physical development. It helps: Vision, physical development, immune function, and hormones. A deficiency can look like: Hair loss, skin issues, vision impairments, and more prone to infections. Foods High in Retinol: Beef liver, lamb liver & cod liver oil. 2⃣ Vitamin B12: A water-soluble vitamin that helps convert food into energy. It helps: Development & function of the central nervous system. A deficiency can look like: Neurological disorders, mood disorders, mental illness, psychosis, an increased risk of Alzheimer's & chronic fatigue. Foods High in B12: Beef liver, beef & feta cheese. 3⃣ Carnosine: A molecule found throughout the body, especially in the brain, gastrointestinal tissues & vertebrae. It helps: Muscular strength & athletic endurance. A deficiency can look like: Decreased muscle tone, neurological tremors & developmental delays. Foods High in Carnosine: Chicken, beef & pork. 4⃣ Creatine: An amino acid found in the muscles & brain. It helps: Muscular strength & athletic endurance. A deficiency can look like: Movement disorders & developmental delays. Foods High in Creatine: Beef, chicken & salmon. 5⃣ Carnitine: An amino acid found in almost every body cell. It helps: Athletic endurance, cognitive function & energy production. A deficiency can look like: Muscle weakness & chronic fatigue. Foods High in Creatine: Beef & pork. 6⃣ Vitamin D3: A fat-soluble vitamin that helps your body absorb calcium & phosphorus. It helps: Improves mood, reduces inflammation & boosts the immune system. A deficiency can look like: Mood disorders, neurological disorders & autoimmune diseases. Foods High in D3: Beef organs, egg yolks & getting your regular dose of the sun! 7⃣ DHA (Docosahexaenoic Acid): An omega-3 fatty acid found in the brain, skin & retina. It helps: Healthy brain function, eyes & nerve tissue. A deficiency can look like: Mental health disorders & developmental disorders in children. Foods High in DHA: Beef & eggs. 8⃣ EPA (Eicosapentaenoic acid): An omega-3 fatty acid found in the brain, skin & retina. It helps: Decreased blood clots, reduces inflammation & reduces high blood pressure. A deficiency can look like: Chronic pain & fatigue. Foods High in EPA: Beef & full-fat dairy. 9⃣ Heme Iron: A form of iron found in the blood & muscles. It helps: Blood health A deficiency can look like: Anemia, depression, hair loss & chronic fatigue. Foods High in Heme Iron: Beef, liver & oysters. 🔟Taurine: An amino acid found in the brain, eyes, heart & muscles. It helps: Athletic endurance & recovery. A deficiency can look like: Cardiovascular problems. Foods High in Taurine: Beef & dairy. 👇Nutritional Role Of Meat In The Human Diet👇 👇Brain Volume Loss Caused By B12 Deficiency👇 👇Why Vegans Have Smaller Brains👇 Speaker: Dr Ben Bikman & Steven Bartlett Podcast: Steven Bartlett DiaryOfaCEO

Valerie Anne Smith

53,428 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The AI industry is optimizing for a definition of intelligence that does not exist. Andrew Ng just said it out loud. Ng: “AGI, to me, should be less about AI that already knows everything under the sun. That seems very challenging, doesn’t seem practical.” The human brain is not the most powerful economic asset in history because of what it holds. It is powerful because of what it can pick up. Ng: “The amazing thing about the human brain is its plasticity, or its ability to learn.” That same biological hardware that earns a PhD in quantum physics could have been trained on chess, surgery, or rewriting global supply chains from scratch. Ng: “That same human brain, just given different training, could have been a chess master, or could have been amazing at playing tennis.” General intelligence is not omniscience. It is the structural capacity to master whatever you point it at. Ng: “It is through learning that we then gain these incredibly specialized intelligences.” The winner is not whoever builds the biggest model. It is whoever builds the most adaptable one. The AI that walks into a domain it has never touched and executes before a human analyst finishes reading the brief. Ng: “What makes the human brain so valuable for economic tasks, is its ability to just learn to do whatever is needed.” Every corporation on earth pays for human labor because humans adapt. Not because they already know everything. AGI is the digitization of that exact capability. At machine speed. At infinite scale. Ng: “A lot of what makes the human brain so general is not that my brain or your brain already knows everything under the sun. It’s our ability to adapt, to learn a huge range of things.” The most powerful economic asset in history was never specialized knowledge. It was the raw capacity to acquire any knowledge, in any domain, on demand. The winning AI is not an encyclopedia. It is the force that makes encyclopedias irrelevant. And once that exists, the question stops being what the AI knows. It becomes what you can teach it before your competitor wakes up. Most people dominating this conversation have not understood that yet.

The AI industry is optimizing for a definition of intelligence that does not exist. Andrew Ng just said it out loud. Ng: “AGI, to me, should be less about AI that already knows everything under the sun. That seems very challenging, doesn’t seem practical.” The human brain is not the most powerful economic asset in history because of what it holds. It is powerful because of what it can pick up. Ng: “The amazing thing about the human brain is its plasticity, or its ability to learn.” That same biological hardware that earns a PhD in quantum physics could have been trained on chess, surgery, or rewriting global supply chains from scratch. Ng: “That same human brain, just given different training, could have been a chess master, or could have been amazing at playing tennis.” General intelligence is not omniscience. It is the structural capacity to master whatever you point it at. Ng: “It is through learning that we then gain these incredibly specialized intelligences.” The winner is not whoever builds the biggest model. It is whoever builds the most adaptable one. The AI that walks into a domain it has never touched and executes before a human analyst finishes reading the brief. Ng: “What makes the human brain so valuable for economic tasks, is its ability to just learn to do whatever is needed.” Every corporation on earth pays for human labor because humans adapt. Not because they already know everything. AGI is the digitization of that exact capability. At machine speed. At infinite scale. Ng: “A lot of what makes the human brain so general is not that my brain or your brain already knows everything under the sun. It’s our ability to adapt, to learn a huge range of things.” The most powerful economic asset in history was never specialized knowledge. It was the raw capacity to acquire any knowledge, in any domain, on demand. The winning AI is not an encyclopedia. It is the force that makes encyclopedias irrelevant. And once that exists, the question stops being what the AI knows. It becomes what you can teach it before your competitor wakes up. Most people dominating this conversation have not understood that yet.

Dustin

19,802 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

⚡️ MS is not a “disease,” and not even a true “disorder.” So what is it? 🤔 🧠 Multiple Sclerosis isn’t your immune system attacking you; it’s your brain losing time with nature, misfiring in circuits that were never meant to fire. When the body forgets the rhythm of sunlight, it mistakes its own signals for danger ⚠️. The immune system then shows up, not to destroy, but to clean up the debris of a body that’s lost its timing. 🆘 MS is your body sending an SOS signal. It’s not breaking. It’s broadcasting. It’s your cells crying out, “I’ve lost the signal… reconnect me to the light.” Once you understand what I’m about to share, you’ll know how to decode the message. 📚 Before we go deeper, learn these key terms 👇 1️⃣ PAM-C = Pineal – Amygdala – Mesencephalon – Cerebellar complex. It’s the brain’s core electrical hub linking light, emotion, balance, and movement. It’s like: your circadian control tower; an antenna translating light and magnetism into brain timing and rhythm. 2️⃣ Myelin 🧬 A fatty, conductive coat that wraps around your nerves, like the rubber insulation around a wire. It keeps the current ⚡️ fast and clean. Without it, signals leak, weaken, or fire in the wrong place. 3️⃣ Redox 🔋 Your body’s electron balance; the charge inside your mitochondria. You raise redox with: 🌅 Sunrise light 🐟 DHA-rich seafood 🧊 Cold exposure (CT) 🦶 Grounding 🥗 Local seasonal food 📵 Low EMF 🌑 Darkness after sunset 4️⃣ Amygdala 💥 A small almond-shaped part of the brain that feels emotions and scans for safety. It’s your body’s 🔔 fire alarm. When it loses sync with sunlight and magnetism, it rings nonstop; keeping you in constant stress 🧩 What’s really going on in MS In MS, the PAM-C loses coherence; it can’t read environmental frequencies like sunlight or Earth’s magnetic field. When that happens: 🧭 The brain loses timing between its regions 🧬 The immune system becomes confused ⚡️ Myelin starts to degrade because redox collapses The PAM-C becomes ground zero for circadian chaos. 🌞 What causes PAM-C failure 🌅 No sunrise light = pineal dysfunction (melatonin off, timing lost) 💡 Blue light at night = amygdala overstimulation (chronic stress loop) 📡 nnEMF exposure = voltage disruption in the mesencephalon(the midbrain like the “traffic light” 🚦 that connects your thinking brain to your body 🐟 Low DHA or no grounding = cerebellum desynchronization(your movement coach 🧘‍♀️ that keeps balance, rhythm, and coordination) When timing collapses, electrical harmony turns into frequency noise, and the immune system reacts to the confusion. And then Demyelination happens. 🫠 Demyelination is what happens when your brain’s insulation melts; and the electrical rhythm with nature is lost. Signals leak, timing fails, and the immune system steps in to clean the wreckage. It’s not war -> it’s an emergency repair. 🧬 MS = PAM-C Desynchronization When this control system loses redox balance, the brain’s electrical architecture collapses; leading to demyelination, fatigue, and immune misfires. 🌅 How to rebuild it? ✅ See the sunrise every morning = resets pineal and amygdala timing ✅ Do cold exposure (CT) 🧊 = strengthens redox & myelin repair ✅ Ground daily 🦶 = restores Earth’s magnetic input to the midbrain ✅ Eat seafood rich in DHA 🐟 = rebuilds neural insulation ✅ Keep true darkness at night 🌑 = regenerates melatonin & mitochondrial charge ✅Minimize your nnEMF. Remember: you can’t heal in the same environment that made you sick. ⏳ How long does it take? It depends on how serious you are about living what you know. The more we align with sunlight, magnetism, and real food, the faster coherence returns. MS is not an autoimmune disease. It’s a timing collapse between light, water, and magnetism; a loss of electrical rhythm inside the brain. Remember: It’s your body sending an SOS, asking to come home to the light.

⚡️ MS is not a “disease,” and not even a true “disorder.” So what is it? 🤔 🧠 Multiple Sclerosis isn’t your immune system attacking you; it’s your brain losing time with nature, misfiring in circuits that were never meant to fire. When the body forgets the rhythm of sunlight, it mistakes its own signals for danger ⚠️. The immune system then shows up, not to destroy, but to clean up the debris of a body that’s lost its timing. 🆘 MS is your body sending an SOS signal. It’s not breaking. It’s broadcasting. It’s your cells crying out, “I’ve lost the signal… reconnect me to the light.” Once you understand what I’m about to share, you’ll know how to decode the message. 📚 Before we go deeper, learn these key terms 👇 1️⃣ PAM-C = Pineal – Amygdala – Mesencephalon – Cerebellar complex. It’s the brain’s core electrical hub linking light, emotion, balance, and movement. It’s like: your circadian control tower; an antenna translating light and magnetism into brain timing and rhythm. 2️⃣ Myelin 🧬 A fatty, conductive coat that wraps around your nerves, like the rubber insulation around a wire. It keeps the current ⚡️ fast and clean. Without it, signals leak, weaken, or fire in the wrong place. 3️⃣ Redox 🔋 Your body’s electron balance; the charge inside your mitochondria. You raise redox with: 🌅 Sunrise light 🐟 DHA-rich seafood 🧊 Cold exposure (CT) 🦶 Grounding 🥗 Local seasonal food 📵 Low EMF 🌑 Darkness after sunset 4️⃣ Amygdala 💥 A small almond-shaped part of the brain that feels emotions and scans for safety. It’s your body’s 🔔 fire alarm. When it loses sync with sunlight and magnetism, it rings nonstop; keeping you in constant stress 🧩 What’s really going on in MS In MS, the PAM-C loses coherence; it can’t read environmental frequencies like sunlight or Earth’s magnetic field. When that happens: 🧭 The brain loses timing between its regions 🧬 The immune system becomes confused ⚡️ Myelin starts to degrade because redox collapses The PAM-C becomes ground zero for circadian chaos. 🌞 What causes PAM-C failure 🌅 No sunrise light = pineal dysfunction (melatonin off, timing lost) 💡 Blue light at night = amygdala overstimulation (chronic stress loop) 📡 nnEMF exposure = voltage disruption in the mesencephalon(the midbrain like the “traffic light” 🚦 that connects your thinking brain to your body 🐟 Low DHA or no grounding = cerebellum desynchronization(your movement coach 🧘‍♀️ that keeps balance, rhythm, and coordination) When timing collapses, electrical harmony turns into frequency noise, and the immune system reacts to the confusion. And then Demyelination happens. 🫠 Demyelination is what happens when your brain’s insulation melts; and the electrical rhythm with nature is lost. Signals leak, timing fails, and the immune system steps in to clean the wreckage. It’s not war -> it’s an emergency repair. 🧬 MS = PAM-C Desynchronization When this control system loses redox balance, the brain’s electrical architecture collapses; leading to demyelination, fatigue, and immune misfires. 🌅 How to rebuild it? ✅ See the sunrise every morning = resets pineal and amygdala timing ✅ Do cold exposure (CT) 🧊 = strengthens redox & myelin repair ✅ Ground daily 🦶 = restores Earth’s magnetic input to the midbrain ✅ Eat seafood rich in DHA 🐟 = rebuilds neural insulation ✅ Keep true darkness at night 🌑 = regenerates melatonin & mitochondrial charge ✅Minimize your nnEMF. Remember: you can’t heal in the same environment that made you sick. ⏳ How long does it take? It depends on how serious you are about living what you know. The more we align with sunlight, magnetism, and real food, the faster coherence returns. MS is not an autoimmune disease. It’s a timing collapse between light, water, and magnetism; a loss of electrical rhythm inside the brain. Remember: It’s your body sending an SOS, asking to come home to the light.

Light Me Away ☀️

49,773 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

THIS GUY CONNECTED HIS AI AGENTS TO HIS OBSIDIAN AND BUILT A BRAIN THAT LEARNS ON ITS OWN. HERE'S HOW TO BUILD IT Obsidian is just markdown files sitting in a folder. That turns out to be the perfect memory for an AI agent, because an agent can read and write those files directly. He wired his agents into the vault so they pull context from it, do the work, and write what they learned back. The notes aren't the point. The loop is, and it gets sharper every cycle How to build it: 1. Point an agent at your vault. The fastest way, no plugins, no API keys: open a terminal and run npx obsidian-mcp /path/to/your/vault. That exposes your Obsidian folder to Claude as a tool it can read, search, and write to. Add it to your Claude Code or Cowork config and restart 2. Confirm it can see the brain. Ask it: "list the notes in my vault and summarize what's in them." If it reads them back, the connection is live. Now it starts every task with everything the vault already holds instead of from zero 3. Give each agent one job and a write-back rule. Tell it: "research this, then save what you found as a new note in /brain with links to related notes." One agent researches, one summarizes, one plans. Each writes its output back into the vault 4. Close the loop. Add one line to every agent's instructions: "read /brain before starting, write your result back when done." Now each task leaves the vault richer, and the next run reads that before it works. It compounds instead of resetting 5. You only steer. Review what the brain produces, point it at the next thing. The agents handle the reading, writing, and connecting The edge isn't better notes. It's a brain that feeds itself, so the work gets sharper every cycle instead of starting over Bookmark this

THIS GUY CONNECTED HIS AI AGENTS TO HIS OBSIDIAN AND BUILT A BRAIN THAT LEARNS ON ITS OWN. HERE'S HOW TO BUILD IT Obsidian is just markdown files sitting in a folder. That turns out to be the perfect memory for an AI agent, because an agent can read and write those files directly. He wired his agents into the vault so they pull context from it, do the work, and write what they learned back. The notes aren't the point. The loop is, and it gets sharper every cycle How to build it: 1. Point an agent at your vault. The fastest way, no plugins, no API keys: open a terminal and run npx obsidian-mcp /path/to/your/vault. That exposes your Obsidian folder to Claude as a tool it can read, search, and write to. Add it to your Claude Code or Cowork config and restart 2. Confirm it can see the brain. Ask it: "list the notes in my vault and summarize what's in them." If it reads them back, the connection is live. Now it starts every task with everything the vault already holds instead of from zero 3. Give each agent one job and a write-back rule. Tell it: "research this, then save what you found as a new note in /brain with links to related notes." One agent researches, one summarizes, one plans. Each writes its output back into the vault 4. Close the loop. Add one line to every agent's instructions: "read /brain before starting, write your result back when done." Now each task leaves the vault richer, and the next run reads that before it works. It compounds instead of resetting 5. You only steer. Review what the brain produces, point it at the next thing. The agents handle the reading, writing, and connecting The edge isn't better notes. It's a brain that feeds itself, so the work gets sharper every cycle instead of starting over Bookmark this

Yarchi

57,975 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

lando talking about how special it feels for him to win constructors’ titles after starting with the team in tougher times and their dominance 🥹❤️‍🩹 “i mean another one is just a great thing. it's another constructor feels the same as the first, because to get the first was quite an achievement if you still look at where we were just three years ago. we've overtaken every team in terms of development. we've outdone them by a long way in terms of development, and in a time when it's almost harder to do than ever, with more restrictions and less wind tunnel time, all of those different things, budget cap, that's really been more in our favor over the last five years comparing to the budget that the other teams could run at. but in a time when it should be more difficult than ever to dominate, that's exactly what the team have done and given us, by a long way, the best car on the grid. i mean, it's always a very nice thing to say. every driver that gets to say that always puts a smile on your face. but we've also done very well as a team in terms of drivers between oscar and myself pushing each other and delivering every single weekend. and you don't see that on any other team. so i think we're also very proud of that as drivers. but for me, i've been with mclaren since i started. especially it was a very different time and different place then to where we are now. so that journey makes it more special to know the downs because that's a lot of what it was back then to see the rise that we've had to see the teamwork, the changes, the atmosphere difference and the leadership from zak, from andrea especially, has turned things around and made us as a team the best in the world. and that's something that many people don't ever get to say”

lando talking about how special it feels for him to win constructors’ titles after starting with the team in tougher times and their dominance 🥹❤️‍🩹 “i mean another one is just a great thing. it's another constructor feels the same as the first, because to get the first was quite an achievement if you still look at where we were just three years ago. we've overtaken every team in terms of development. we've outdone them by a long way in terms of development, and in a time when it's almost harder to do than ever, with more restrictions and less wind tunnel time, all of those different things, budget cap, that's really been more in our favor over the last five years comparing to the budget that the other teams could run at. but in a time when it should be more difficult than ever to dominate, that's exactly what the team have done and given us, by a long way, the best car on the grid. i mean, it's always a very nice thing to say. every driver that gets to say that always puts a smile on your face. but we've also done very well as a team in terms of drivers between oscar and myself pushing each other and delivering every single weekend. and you don't see that on any other team. so i think we're also very proud of that as drivers. but for me, i've been with mclaren since i started. especially it was a very different time and different place then to where we are now. so that journey makes it more special to know the downs because that's a lot of what it was back then to see the rise that we've had to see the teamwork, the changes, the atmosphere difference and the leadership from zak, from andrea especially, has turned things around and made us as a team the best in the world. and that's something that many people don't ever get to say”

ray

35,603 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Physician Dr. Chris Shoemaker describes how lipid nanoparticles were NEVER SAFE. Even long before the C19-jab rollout. "Even back into the 1990s... they had 100% lethality...[including] lethal effects on the brain... There was zero market for [them] after 30 years of study." This clip of Shoemaker (Chris Shoemaker, MD), a Canadian comprehensive physician, is taken from an interview with Jason Lavigne (Jason Lavigne) posted to Rumble on August 31, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Every mRNA Platform MRNA in any form given to anybody has a lethality to it. Has a effect on fertility, which is negative, has an effect on brain function, which is negative, which is because of the design of what lipid nanoparticles are shaped as and what they on their own do. "In fact, in animal studies in the early 2000s and the early 2010s, and even back into the 1990s when they were looking and considering to use lipid nanoparticles to carry small amounts of chemotherapy to the brain, the lipid nanoparticles were really good because they were really good at getting into the brain. And that's where they wanted to see if they could send some chemotherapy directing it to brain tumors when they injected. "And this was only in animals, they had 100% lethality. Lipid nanoparticles, by and of themselves in animals who were smaller than humans, but they were having lethal effects on the brain, they could never get an approval to give a lipid nanoparticle carried chemotherapy into anyone except a person who had five months or less to live. "So back in the 2000s, certain patients who knew they were going to die within five months were given permission to be part of the study to see if it was beneficial and to see it was safe. I can't say numbers that happened there. I'm sure some people's lived and many people died because that's not surprising. They were going to die of their brain tumor within five months. "But the one thing was that all of that study, all of it did nothing to prove safety, even for cancer patients to receive medications via lipid nanoparticle because it had a lethality of its own. And once you put MRNA inside it and once you put DNA plasmids in parallel with it, at the same time, you're doing a terrible risk to the patient population. And certainly the one group should never get it are the healthiest. You don't give it to healthy people. Heck, you're not even allowed to give it to people with cancer according to your own study protocols. "And they couldn't. So MRNA in lipid nanoparticles had zero market. There was zero market for it after 30 years of study. And the market was invented and the market was created and the market has happened to all of us because of nefarious decisions made at the top of world health organizations. The WHO and the people WHO are the paymasters of the who, one name of which is William Gates and there are others."

Physician Dr. Chris Shoemaker describes how lipid nanoparticles were NEVER SAFE. Even long before the C19-jab rollout. "Even back into the 1990s... they had 100% lethality...[including] lethal effects on the brain... There was zero market for [them] after 30 years of study." This clip of Shoemaker (Chris Shoemaker, MD), a Canadian comprehensive physician, is taken from an interview with Jason Lavigne (Jason Lavigne) posted to Rumble on August 31, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Every mRNA Platform MRNA in any form given to anybody has a lethality to it. Has a effect on fertility, which is negative, has an effect on brain function, which is negative, which is because of the design of what lipid nanoparticles are shaped as and what they on their own do. "In fact, in animal studies in the early 2000s and the early 2010s, and even back into the 1990s when they were looking and considering to use lipid nanoparticles to carry small amounts of chemotherapy to the brain, the lipid nanoparticles were really good because they were really good at getting into the brain. And that's where they wanted to see if they could send some chemotherapy directing it to brain tumors when they injected. "And this was only in animals, they had 100% lethality. Lipid nanoparticles, by and of themselves in animals who were smaller than humans, but they were having lethal effects on the brain, they could never get an approval to give a lipid nanoparticle carried chemotherapy into anyone except a person who had five months or less to live. "So back in the 2000s, certain patients who knew they were going to die within five months were given permission to be part of the study to see if it was beneficial and to see it was safe. I can't say numbers that happened there. I'm sure some people's lived and many people died because that's not surprising. They were going to die of their brain tumor within five months. "But the one thing was that all of that study, all of it did nothing to prove safety, even for cancer patients to receive medications via lipid nanoparticle because it had a lethality of its own. And once you put MRNA inside it and once you put DNA plasmids in parallel with it, at the same time, you're doing a terrible risk to the patient population. And certainly the one group should never get it are the healthiest. You don't give it to healthy people. Heck, you're not even allowed to give it to people with cancer according to your own study protocols. "And they couldn't. So MRNA in lipid nanoparticles had zero market. There was zero market for it after 30 years of study. And the market was invented and the market was created and the market has happened to all of us because of nefarious decisions made at the top of world health organizations. The WHO and the people WHO are the paymasters of the who, one name of which is William Gates and there are others."

Sense Receptor

24,068 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Demis Hassabis, the Nobel Prize winner who runs Google DeepMind just described the most consequential project on earth, and most people have no idea it exists. The project is called Isomorphic Labs and the goal is to end the way drugs have been developed for the last century. Here is the problem it is trying to solve. Developing a single drug today takes an average of 10 years, costs billions of dollars, and fails 90 percent of the time before it ever reaches a patient. Of every 10 drugs that enter clinical trials, only one makes it through. The other nine years of work, the other billions of dollars, the other scientific careers, gone. Hassabis believes AI can collapse that entire process from identifying a disease target to designing a compound that binds to it, predicts how it behaves in the body, and minimizes side effects , end to end, on a computer, before a single experiment is run. The foundation is AlphaFold, the AI system that solved one of biology's hardest problems predicting the 3D structure of every protein in the human body and won him the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2024. But knowing a protein's shape is only one part of designing a drug. Isomorphic is building what Hassabis describes as adjacent systems , AlphaFold 3, AlphaFold 4, and now a unified model called IsoDDE , that take the next steps. From designing the actual chemical compound that binds to the protein, predicting its binding strength, identifying new pockets to target that no one has ever found before. IsoDDE more than doubles the accuracy of AlphaFold 3 on the hardest protein-ligand prediction benchmarks that exist. Isomorphic is already running 18 to 19 live drug programs, cardiovascular disease, cancer, immunology in partnership with Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Johnson and Johnson. The first human clinical trial of a fully AI-designed drug is expected by the end of 2026. If that trial succeeds, it will be the first time in history that a drug put into a human body was designed not by a team of chemists working for a decade but by an AI working for months. Hassabis's long-term vision is even more direct, one day you describe a disease, click a button, and a drug blueprint comes out the other side. AI will solve almost all diseases within 10 years.

Demis Hassabis, the Nobel Prize winner who runs Google DeepMind just described the most consequential project on earth, and most people have no idea it exists. The project is called Isomorphic Labs and the goal is to end the way drugs have been developed for the last century. Here is the problem it is trying to solve. Developing a single drug today takes an average of 10 years, costs billions of dollars, and fails 90 percent of the time before it ever reaches a patient. Of every 10 drugs that enter clinical trials, only one makes it through. The other nine years of work, the other billions of dollars, the other scientific careers, gone. Hassabis believes AI can collapse that entire process from identifying a disease target to designing a compound that binds to it, predicts how it behaves in the body, and minimizes side effects , end to end, on a computer, before a single experiment is run. The foundation is AlphaFold, the AI system that solved one of biology's hardest problems predicting the 3D structure of every protein in the human body and won him the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2024. But knowing a protein's shape is only one part of designing a drug. Isomorphic is building what Hassabis describes as adjacent systems , AlphaFold 3, AlphaFold 4, and now a unified model called IsoDDE , that take the next steps. From designing the actual chemical compound that binds to the protein, predicting its binding strength, identifying new pockets to target that no one has ever found before. IsoDDE more than doubles the accuracy of AlphaFold 3 on the hardest protein-ligand prediction benchmarks that exist. Isomorphic is already running 18 to 19 live drug programs, cardiovascular disease, cancer, immunology in partnership with Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Johnson and Johnson. The first human clinical trial of a fully AI-designed drug is expected by the end of 2026. If that trial succeeds, it will be the first time in history that a drug put into a human body was designed not by a team of chemists working for a decade but by an AI working for months. Hassabis's long-term vision is even more direct, one day you describe a disease, click a button, and a drug blueprint comes out the other side. AI will solve almost all diseases within 10 years.

Milk Road AI

36,062 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨🚨🚨 Dutch Cancer Researcher and Erasmus Medical Centre Assc Prof Maarten Fornerod discusses DNA contamination in COVID Vaccines. ---------------------------- ...for last 35 years or so I've been working uh in the areas of molecular biology, gene expression, biology, cancer biology and recently in the last years, maybe last 10 years in the context of big data and computational biology... ...when we use genetic vaccines what we do essentially is we're making a complex intervention in a very complex system. It's impossible to predict what happens if you combine these two complex systems, and you get unpredictable effects. .. And the only way to go about this is to do genotoxic research, when you want to introduce a genetic medicine into a human being and that genetotic research has to be independent, it has to be double blind, has to be long lasting. AND ALL THESE HAVE NOT BEEN DONE WITH THE GENETIC CORONA VACCINES! if there's a vaccine, there's a little bit of DNA in there upon injection that is very, very rapidly degraded by the human body. However if it's protected and in a lipid nanoarticle it can very efficiently be transduced in the cell... I've been doing this this many, many times. This is called lipofection and it's a very efficient way to introduce DNA into a cell. ...Many people think that this is not possible. But I've been working in nuclear transport for many years, I think more than 10 years. So I've been exposed to a lot of molecular cell biology of nuclear cytoplasmic transport. And it's clear that the DNA can enter the nucleus. Now to make things worse, the mRNA vaccine doesn't stay in the arm but it's detected in , in all different organs including the reproductive system. And so partly this is based on animal models, of course we know from Michael Morz that he has detected uh the spike protein in brain, in the heart and it's for sure it's detected in the blood and even in breast milk. ..So there's NO DOUBT that this mRNA vaccine spreads widely in the human body. ..Now from a genetic point of view, there are possible consequences uh of this and the consequences could be a 1. long term disruption of cellular processes that could lead to disease. 2. there's a risk of insertional mutageenesis in somatic cells that can lead to cancer. 3. the insertion mutogenesis takes place in a germ cell which would be a hereditary burden uh on the human population. 4. And you could also think that these um DNAs, could transfect the microbiome and it could possibly lead to bacterial resistance. So these are all possible..the consequences of these genetic vaccines in my view, the shortcomings in this rollout of these vaccines were there was no genotoxic research performed at all. There was no safety studies, on carcinogenic potential of these vaccines. My personal opinion is that it's now not a question of whether, it will integrate in recipient's DNA, but how often it occurs... It's just a numbers game. If you do this in many cells, many persons it will no doubt integrate in cells in human recipients. So the question does it affect the human genome? I would say it probably, I think it most certainly does. And you see Kevin McKernan here and he represented ah a preliminary data where he detected a possible Pfizer DNA in colon cancer biopsy one year after vaccination.

🚨🚨🚨 Dutch Cancer Researcher and Erasmus Medical Centre Assc Prof Maarten Fornerod discusses DNA contamination in COVID Vaccines. ---------------------------- ...for last 35 years or so I've been working uh in the areas of molecular biology, gene expression, biology, cancer biology and recently in the last years, maybe last 10 years in the context of big data and computational biology... ...when we use genetic vaccines what we do essentially is we're making a complex intervention in a very complex system. It's impossible to predict what happens if you combine these two complex systems, and you get unpredictable effects. .. And the only way to go about this is to do genotoxic research, when you want to introduce a genetic medicine into a human being and that genetotic research has to be independent, it has to be double blind, has to be long lasting. AND ALL THESE HAVE NOT BEEN DONE WITH THE GENETIC CORONA VACCINES! if there's a vaccine, there's a little bit of DNA in there upon injection that is very, very rapidly degraded by the human body. However if it's protected and in a lipid nanoarticle it can very efficiently be transduced in the cell... I've been doing this this many, many times. This is called lipofection and it's a very efficient way to introduce DNA into a cell. ...Many people think that this is not possible. But I've been working in nuclear transport for many years, I think more than 10 years. So I've been exposed to a lot of molecular cell biology of nuclear cytoplasmic transport. And it's clear that the DNA can enter the nucleus. Now to make things worse, the mRNA vaccine doesn't stay in the arm but it's detected in , in all different organs including the reproductive system. And so partly this is based on animal models, of course we know from Michael Morz that he has detected uh the spike protein in brain, in the heart and it's for sure it's detected in the blood and even in breast milk. ..So there's NO DOUBT that this mRNA vaccine spreads widely in the human body. ..Now from a genetic point of view, there are possible consequences uh of this and the consequences could be a 1. long term disruption of cellular processes that could lead to disease. 2. there's a risk of insertional mutageenesis in somatic cells that can lead to cancer. 3. the insertion mutogenesis takes place in a germ cell which would be a hereditary burden uh on the human population. 4. And you could also think that these um DNAs, could transfect the microbiome and it could possibly lead to bacterial resistance. So these are all possible..the consequences of these genetic vaccines in my view, the shortcomings in this rollout of these vaccines were there was no genotoxic research performed at all. There was no safety studies, on carcinogenic potential of these vaccines. My personal opinion is that it's now not a question of whether, it will integrate in recipient's DNA, but how often it occurs... It's just a numbers game. If you do this in many cells, many persons it will no doubt integrate in cells in human recipients. So the question does it affect the human genome? I would say it probably, I think it most certainly does. And you see Kevin McKernan here and he represented ah a preliminary data where he detected a possible Pfizer DNA in colon cancer biopsy one year after vaccination.

aussie17

126,273 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I lost 138 lbs eating 120-150 grams of fat a day. Let me say that again for the people in the back. One hundred and fifty grams of fat. Per day. Bacon. Butter. Egg yolks. Chuck steak. Ground beef. I was flooding my body with animal fat and my body responded by healing everything. My hormones balanced. My insulin resistance reversed. My metabolism healed. My inflammation dropped. My brain fog cleared. My skin improved. My joints stopped aching. All from eating the one thing we’ve been told for 50 years would kill us. Here’s what they don’t tell you about fat. Your brain is nearly 60% fat. Every single cell in your body has a fat based membrane that controls what goes in and out. Your hormones, the ones that regulate everything from your mood to your metabolism to your menstrual cycle, are built from fat. Specifically saturated fat and cholesterol. The very things they told us to stop eating. Fat is what allows your body to absorb vitamins A, D, E, and K. Without fat, you can eat all the vegetables in the world and your body can’t even use the nutrients. Fat is what keeps you full. Fat is what keeps your blood sugar stable. Fat is what gives your body long, steady energy instead of the crash and burn cycle you get from carbs and sugar. And what did we do? We went low fat. We replaced butter with margarine. We replaced lard and tallow with seed oils. We filled everything with sugar to make up for the flavor we lost when we took the fat out. And then we wondered why everyone got sick, got fat, got diabetic, got depressed, and got put on fifteen medications. The low fat era was the biggest nutritional disaster in modern history. And we’re still living in the fallout. I ate more fat than most people would ever be comfortable with. And it gave me my life back.🧈👑

I lost 138 lbs eating 120-150 grams of fat a day. Let me say that again for the people in the back. One hundred and fifty grams of fat. Per day. Bacon. Butter. Egg yolks. Chuck steak. Ground beef. I was flooding my body with animal fat and my body responded by healing everything. My hormones balanced. My insulin resistance reversed. My metabolism healed. My inflammation dropped. My brain fog cleared. My skin improved. My joints stopped aching. All from eating the one thing we’ve been told for 50 years would kill us. Here’s what they don’t tell you about fat. Your brain is nearly 60% fat. Every single cell in your body has a fat based membrane that controls what goes in and out. Your hormones, the ones that regulate everything from your mood to your metabolism to your menstrual cycle, are built from fat. Specifically saturated fat and cholesterol. The very things they told us to stop eating. Fat is what allows your body to absorb vitamins A, D, E, and K. Without fat, you can eat all the vegetables in the world and your body can’t even use the nutrients. Fat is what keeps you full. Fat is what keeps your blood sugar stable. Fat is what gives your body long, steady energy instead of the crash and burn cycle you get from carbs and sugar. And what did we do? We went low fat. We replaced butter with margarine. We replaced lard and tallow with seed oils. We filled everything with sugar to make up for the flavor we lost when we took the fat out. And then we wondered why everyone got sick, got fat, got diabetic, got depressed, and got put on fifteen medications. The low fat era was the biggest nutritional disaster in modern history. And we’re still living in the fallout. I ate more fat than most people would ever be comfortable with. And it gave me my life back.🧈👑

Queen of Carni

44,320 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Geoffrey Hinton just made every AI critic accidentally describe their own brain. Hinton: “They shouldn’t be called hallucinations. They should be called confabulations.” One word. The entire debate unravels. The tech industry sees AI produce a confident wrong answer and calls it a defect. A bug to patch. They are measuring intelligence against the standard of a filing cabinet. And exposing that they understand neither. Hinton: “It’s not that there’s a file stored somewhere in your brain, like in a filing cabinet or in a computer memory.” Your brain does not store memories. It rebuilds them from nothing every time you remember. Fills gaps it never discloses. Fabricates details you would stake your life on. Then hands it all to you as truth. Hinton: “If I ask you to remember something that happened a few years ago, you’ll construct something that seems very plausible to you. And some of the details will be right and some will be wrong.” The wrong parts feel identical to the right ones. No internal warning. No distinction between what was remembered and what was invented on the spot. You have argued over memories that were partially fiction. Told stories about your own life that your brain manufactured in real time. With total conviction. And never once suspected. This is not a defect in human cognition. This IS cognition. The mechanism that fabricates is the same one that reasons, creates, and makes connections no one taught it to make. Not a separate system. Same architecture. Same process. You cannot remove the confabulation without killing the intelligence. They are the same thing. Hinton: “Psychologists have been studying confabulation in people since at least the 1930s.” A century of evidence. No one called the human brain broken. The moment a machine runs on the same principle, the world calls it defective. The people demanding AI that never gets a single detail wrong are not asking for intelligence. They’re asking for a search engine that sounds articulate. What we built is something else entirely. A system that thinks the way thinking actually works. Not retrieval. Construction. The imperfection is not the cost of intelligence. It is the signature.

Geoffrey Hinton just made every AI critic accidentally describe their own brain. Hinton: “They shouldn’t be called hallucinations. They should be called confabulations.” One word. The entire debate unravels. The tech industry sees AI produce a confident wrong answer and calls it a defect. A bug to patch. They are measuring intelligence against the standard of a filing cabinet. And exposing that they understand neither. Hinton: “It’s not that there’s a file stored somewhere in your brain, like in a filing cabinet or in a computer memory.” Your brain does not store memories. It rebuilds them from nothing every time you remember. Fills gaps it never discloses. Fabricates details you would stake your life on. Then hands it all to you as truth. Hinton: “If I ask you to remember something that happened a few years ago, you’ll construct something that seems very plausible to you. And some of the details will be right and some will be wrong.” The wrong parts feel identical to the right ones. No internal warning. No distinction between what was remembered and what was invented on the spot. You have argued over memories that were partially fiction. Told stories about your own life that your brain manufactured in real time. With total conviction. And never once suspected. This is not a defect in human cognition. This IS cognition. The mechanism that fabricates is the same one that reasons, creates, and makes connections no one taught it to make. Not a separate system. Same architecture. Same process. You cannot remove the confabulation without killing the intelligence. They are the same thing. Hinton: “Psychologists have been studying confabulation in people since at least the 1930s.” A century of evidence. No one called the human brain broken. The moment a machine runs on the same principle, the world calls it defective. The people demanding AI that never gets a single detail wrong are not asking for intelligence. They’re asking for a search engine that sounds articulate. What we built is something else entirely. A system that thinks the way thinking actually works. Not retrieval. Construction. The imperfection is not the cost of intelligence. It is the signature.

Dustin

15,832 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Human Chromosome Number 2 were fused together about 200,000 years ago and it not clear what did this, but it gave us the human brain of logic, empathy and creativity. — “But what they’re showing is that we showed up about 200,000 years ago. Now there’s a little evidence that may have been back as far as 300,000. But the kicker is that we can now look at the DNA and reverse engineer it and say, what did it take to get where we are? And what scientists are now calling the smoking gun. And there’s still a lot of controversy around this is human chromosome number 2. Human chromosome number 2 is the second largest chromosome in every cell of the body. It’s got about 1200 or so genes in that chromosome. And just one of them, gene tbr number one, is responsible for most of the brain that we have for our neocortex. So our humanness, our empathy, sympathy, compassion, love, our cognitive abilities, the mirror neurons, all these kinds of things are because that one gene. Well, where this gets really interesting is where did chromosome 2 come from? And scientists have the answer, but they don’t like the answer because chromosome 2 is the product of a fusion. Proceedings from National Academy of Sciences. The volume Genetics says this very clearly. We conclude that the origin of human chromosome 2 is the product of an ancestral fusion of telomere to telomere. Fusion of two pre existing chromosomes. That does not happen in nature. It can’t happen in nature. So here’s what they’re saying. You got two fully formed, fully functional chromosomes, and on the end are the telomeres that protect those chromosomes when the cells divide. And that’s why they’re on the end, they take the hit. It’s a trauma in a cell when those chromosomes are pulled apart and some of the DNA doesn’t make it. So nature puts telomeres on the end to take the hit, so the good DNA remains intact, and that’s why it’s on the ends. Human chromosome two, those telomeres are right in the middle of the chromosome where they shouldn’t be, because those chromosomes were fused together about 200,000 years ago when we appeared”

Human Chromosome Number 2 were fused together about 200,000 years ago and it not clear what did this, but it gave us the human brain of logic, empathy and creativity. — “But what they’re showing is that we showed up about 200,000 years ago. Now there’s a little evidence that may have been back as far as 300,000. But the kicker is that we can now look at the DNA and reverse engineer it and say, what did it take to get where we are? And what scientists are now calling the smoking gun. And there’s still a lot of controversy around this is human chromosome number 2. Human chromosome number 2 is the second largest chromosome in every cell of the body. It’s got about 1200 or so genes in that chromosome. And just one of them, gene tbr number one, is responsible for most of the brain that we have for our neocortex. So our humanness, our empathy, sympathy, compassion, love, our cognitive abilities, the mirror neurons, all these kinds of things are because that one gene. Well, where this gets really interesting is where did chromosome 2 come from? And scientists have the answer, but they don’t like the answer because chromosome 2 is the product of a fusion. Proceedings from National Academy of Sciences. The volume Genetics says this very clearly. We conclude that the origin of human chromosome 2 is the product of an ancestral fusion of telomere to telomere. Fusion of two pre existing chromosomes. That does not happen in nature. It can’t happen in nature. So here’s what they’re saying. You got two fully formed, fully functional chromosomes, and on the end are the telomeres that protect those chromosomes when the cells divide. And that’s why they’re on the end, they take the hit. It’s a trauma in a cell when those chromosomes are pulled apart and some of the DNA doesn’t make it. So nature puts telomeres on the end to take the hit, so the good DNA remains intact, and that’s why it’s on the ends. Human chromosome two, those telomeres are right in the middle of the chromosome where they shouldn’t be, because those chromosomes were fused together about 200,000 years ago when we appeared”

Brian Roemmele

165,185 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Where is the triangle? Alex O'Connor thinks consciousness is the one thing materialism can't explain away and he has a deceptively simple argument for it. Close your eyes. Picture a triangle. You can see it. The shape, the angles, maybe even the colour. It's right there, vivid and undeniable. Now ask yourself: where is that triangle? According to Alex, this single question cuts to the heart of one of philosophy's oldest problems. A strict materialist, someone who believes everything in the universe reduces to physical matter has to say that triangle exists somewhere in the neurons of your brain. But if a neurosurgeon cracked open your skull right now, they wouldn't find a triangle anywhere inside. "If everything you experience is reducible to the material when I close my eyes and see a triangle, there really is a triangle there. I can see it. It's there. And I think well, where is that triangle? The materialist has to say it's reducible to just somewhere in your brain. But if I cut open your brain I'm not going to find a triangle inside of it." He anticipates the obvious pushback. When he raised this on YouTube, commenters pointed to computers as a counter-example: if you cut open a computer, you won't find the triangle it's displaying on screen either. But the hardware is still producing a real image on a real screen. Alex's response is that this analogy doesn't hold because the mind has no screen. There is no separate interface between the brain's processing and the experience of seeing. The brain is the computer and the screen. Which only deepens the mystery: somehow, purely physical processes are generating a first-person, subjective experience: colours, shapes and images that can't be located anywhere in physical space. "It's as if the computer itself somehow had a triangle in the computer's own first-person subjective experience. Like where is that triangle that you can picture in your head? Where the hell is it?" For Alex, consciousness isn't just another interesting puzzle in the philosophy of mind. It's the big objection to materialism. The thing that, once you sit with it, seems to demand that there is something more going on than matter arranged in clever ways. He points to something as ordinary as dreaming as a case in point. Every night you produce vivid images full scenes, faces, colours without any external input. An entire visual world conjured from nowhere. Where does it come from? Where does it go? "Even just when you have an average dream, it's fascinating to think what's going on there. You've got images in your head, you can close your eyes and you can picture things, you can see colours, you can see shapes in your head. Like where are those shapes?" The triangle thought experiment has a way of making this undeniable. It's not abstract. You can do it right now. And when you do, you run headfirst into the hard problem of consciousness: the gap between the physical description of the brain and the felt quality of experience that no amount of neuroscience has yet bridged. Whether you find Alex's argument convincing or not, the question it raises is genuine: how does purely physical matter give rise to the inner world we each inhabit a world of colours, shapes, memories, and dreams that exists nowhere except in the first person?

Where is the triangle? Alex O'Connor thinks consciousness is the one thing materialism can't explain away and he has a deceptively simple argument for it. Close your eyes. Picture a triangle. You can see it. The shape, the angles, maybe even the colour. It's right there, vivid and undeniable. Now ask yourself: where is that triangle? According to Alex, this single question cuts to the heart of one of philosophy's oldest problems. A strict materialist, someone who believes everything in the universe reduces to physical matter has to say that triangle exists somewhere in the neurons of your brain. But if a neurosurgeon cracked open your skull right now, they wouldn't find a triangle anywhere inside. "If everything you experience is reducible to the material when I close my eyes and see a triangle, there really is a triangle there. I can see it. It's there. And I think well, where is that triangle? The materialist has to say it's reducible to just somewhere in your brain. But if I cut open your brain I'm not going to find a triangle inside of it." He anticipates the obvious pushback. When he raised this on YouTube, commenters pointed to computers as a counter-example: if you cut open a computer, you won't find the triangle it's displaying on screen either. But the hardware is still producing a real image on a real screen. Alex's response is that this analogy doesn't hold because the mind has no screen. There is no separate interface between the brain's processing and the experience of seeing. The brain is the computer and the screen. Which only deepens the mystery: somehow, purely physical processes are generating a first-person, subjective experience: colours, shapes and images that can't be located anywhere in physical space. "It's as if the computer itself somehow had a triangle in the computer's own first-person subjective experience. Like where is that triangle that you can picture in your head? Where the hell is it?" For Alex, consciousness isn't just another interesting puzzle in the philosophy of mind. It's the big objection to materialism. The thing that, once you sit with it, seems to demand that there is something more going on than matter arranged in clever ways. He points to something as ordinary as dreaming as a case in point. Every night you produce vivid images full scenes, faces, colours without any external input. An entire visual world conjured from nowhere. Where does it come from? Where does it go? "Even just when you have an average dream, it's fascinating to think what's going on there. You've got images in your head, you can close your eyes and you can picture things, you can see colours, you can see shapes in your head. Like where are those shapes?" The triangle thought experiment has a way of making this undeniable. It's not abstract. You can do it right now. And when you do, you run headfirst into the hard problem of consciousness: the gap between the physical description of the brain and the felt quality of experience that no amount of neuroscience has yet bridged. Whether you find Alex's argument convincing or not, the question it raises is genuine: how does purely physical matter give rise to the inner world we each inhabit a world of colours, shapes, memories, and dreams that exists nowhere except in the first person?

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

12,267 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elon Musk just told you the job is dying. Most people heard a prediction. A few heard a prison door opening. Musk: “In less than 20 years, working at all will be optional.” That is not a policy suggestion. That is a countdown. For three hundred years, the human blueprint has been identical. You are born. You move to the city. You rent a box near the office. You trade your body and your hours for the right to exist. You do this until you are old. Then you stop. Then you die. The entire model runs on one assumption. That human labor is the only engine. AI and robotics delete that assumption. When the machine handles production at a scale no human crew can match, the forced migration to the city evaporates. The commute evaporates. The cubicle evaporates. The alarm clock that owns your nervous system for forty years evaporates. Musk: “I think it won’t be the case that you have to be in a city for a job.” The city was never a choice. It was a requirement disguised as ambition. You moved to the noise and the concrete and the $4,000 rent because the paycheck lived there. Remove the paycheck from the equation and the geography changes overnight. You can live in the mountains. On the coast. In the silence of a town most people have never heard of. You can wake up to nothing but trees and cold air and the complete absence of anyone else’s schedule. That is not a fantasy. That is the math resolving. But here is where most people break. They hear “work is optional” and they see emptiness. A species with nothing to do. Billions of people staring at screens until their minds dissolve. That fear tells you everything about what the system has already done to us. We confused labor with purpose. The grind with meaning. The paycheck with proof that we matter. Musk: “In the same way that you could grow your own vegetables in your garden.” The analogy is precise. You do not grow tomatoes because the economy demands it. You grow them because something in you wants to build a thing with your hands and watch it come alive. That instinct does not disappear when the job does. It gets unleashed. The artist who spent twenty years doing accounting finally paints. The engineer who always wanted to build something of her own finally builds it. The kid in a small town who could never afford to take the risk finally takes it. Work does not vanish. Forced work vanishes. What replaces it is creation without a gun to your head. This is the part that keeps me up at night. We are standing at the edge of the largest liberation in human history. And the loudest voices in the room are begging to stay in the cell. They want the commute. They want the boss. They want the structure that tells them when to eat and when to sleep and when they are allowed to think about their own life. Because freedom without a template is terrifying. The next twenty years will not test our technology. The technology is already ahead of schedule. They will test whether the species can handle what it has been asking for since the beginning of civilization. Time. Space. Silence. And the unbearable weight of choosing what your life actually means when no one is forcing the answer. That is not a prediction. That is the final exam. And nobody is ready.

Elon Musk just told you the job is dying. Most people heard a prediction. A few heard a prison door opening. Musk: “In less than 20 years, working at all will be optional.” That is not a policy suggestion. That is a countdown. For three hundred years, the human blueprint has been identical. You are born. You move to the city. You rent a box near the office. You trade your body and your hours for the right to exist. You do this until you are old. Then you stop. Then you die. The entire model runs on one assumption. That human labor is the only engine. AI and robotics delete that assumption. When the machine handles production at a scale no human crew can match, the forced migration to the city evaporates. The commute evaporates. The cubicle evaporates. The alarm clock that owns your nervous system for forty years evaporates. Musk: “I think it won’t be the case that you have to be in a city for a job.” The city was never a choice. It was a requirement disguised as ambition. You moved to the noise and the concrete and the $4,000 rent because the paycheck lived there. Remove the paycheck from the equation and the geography changes overnight. You can live in the mountains. On the coast. In the silence of a town most people have never heard of. You can wake up to nothing but trees and cold air and the complete absence of anyone else’s schedule. That is not a fantasy. That is the math resolving. But here is where most people break. They hear “work is optional” and they see emptiness. A species with nothing to do. Billions of people staring at screens until their minds dissolve. That fear tells you everything about what the system has already done to us. We confused labor with purpose. The grind with meaning. The paycheck with proof that we matter. Musk: “In the same way that you could grow your own vegetables in your garden.” The analogy is precise. You do not grow tomatoes because the economy demands it. You grow them because something in you wants to build a thing with your hands and watch it come alive. That instinct does not disappear when the job does. It gets unleashed. The artist who spent twenty years doing accounting finally paints. The engineer who always wanted to build something of her own finally builds it. The kid in a small town who could never afford to take the risk finally takes it. Work does not vanish. Forced work vanishes. What replaces it is creation without a gun to your head. This is the part that keeps me up at night. We are standing at the edge of the largest liberation in human history. And the loudest voices in the room are begging to stay in the cell. They want the commute. They want the boss. They want the structure that tells them when to eat and when to sleep and when they are allowed to think about their own life. Because freedom without a template is terrifying. The next twenty years will not test our technology. The technology is already ahead of schedule. They will test whether the species can handle what it has been asking for since the beginning of civilization. Time. Space. Silence. And the unbearable weight of choosing what your life actually means when no one is forcing the answer. That is not a prediction. That is the final exam. And nobody is ready.

Dustin

111,613 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Everyone keeps telling her to eat less fat so her body will burn stored fat. But it is not working. And there is a reason for that. When you come from a background of insulin resistance your body has literally lost the ability to tap into stored fat. Elevated insulin for extended periods shoves glucose into your fat cells and locks it behind closed doors. Your liver is still running around looking for glucose because that is all it has ever known. You cannot fix that by eating less fat. You fix it by flooding your body with fat. I am talking 150 to 200 grams a day. You have to force your liver to stop looking for glucose and finally accept fat as its fuel source. That is not maintenance eating. That is metabolic retraining. And before you close this post let me remind you what fat actually does for your body. Your brain is nearly 60% fat. Every single one of your hormones is made from fat. Your cell membranes are made from fat. Fat carries your fat soluble vitamins, A, D, E and K, without fat you cannot absorb them at all. Fat keeps you satiated, stabilizes your mood, gives you steady energy, and keeps your hormones balanced. Fat is not the enemy. Fat is literally the building material your body runs on. About 70% of your calories should be coming from fat. That is not a typo. Once your liver concedes and fat becomes the rule of the land that is fat adaptation. And THAT is when you can start pulling back on dietary fat slightly and let your body tap into its own stores. That is when the weight really starts moving. I know it sounds completely backwards. I lived on low fat my entire life and ballooned to 330 pounds eating way too many carbohydrates. It took me months to unlearn everything I had been taught. The answer has always been fat. It will always be fat.👑

Everyone keeps telling her to eat less fat so her body will burn stored fat. But it is not working. And there is a reason for that. When you come from a background of insulin resistance your body has literally lost the ability to tap into stored fat. Elevated insulin for extended periods shoves glucose into your fat cells and locks it behind closed doors. Your liver is still running around looking for glucose because that is all it has ever known. You cannot fix that by eating less fat. You fix it by flooding your body with fat. I am talking 150 to 200 grams a day. You have to force your liver to stop looking for glucose and finally accept fat as its fuel source. That is not maintenance eating. That is metabolic retraining. And before you close this post let me remind you what fat actually does for your body. Your brain is nearly 60% fat. Every single one of your hormones is made from fat. Your cell membranes are made from fat. Fat carries your fat soluble vitamins, A, D, E and K, without fat you cannot absorb them at all. Fat keeps you satiated, stabilizes your mood, gives you steady energy, and keeps your hormones balanced. Fat is not the enemy. Fat is literally the building material your body runs on. About 70% of your calories should be coming from fat. That is not a typo. Once your liver concedes and fat becomes the rule of the land that is fat adaptation. And THAT is when you can start pulling back on dietary fat slightly and let your body tap into its own stores. That is when the weight really starts moving. I know it sounds completely backwards. I lived on low fat my entire life and ballooned to 330 pounds eating way too many carbohydrates. It took me months to unlearn everything I had been taught. The answer has always been fat. It will always be fat.👑

Queen of Carni

18,088 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Coincidence? I don't think so. For nearly 500 years, hundreds of millions of people looked at the most famous painting of God ever made, and none of them noticed what was hiding in plain sight. Then, in 1990, a doctor looked up at the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel and realized that God is wrapped inside a human brain... The painting is Michelangelo's Creation of Adam, finished around 1512. You know the image even if you don't know its name: God reaching out from the heavens, His finger almost touching Adam's, the spark of life about to leap across the gap. But look at the shape around God, the swirling red cloak that holds Him and the angels aloft. For five centuries it was seen as just a billowing robe... but in 1990, a physician named Frank Lynn Meshberger published a paper in the Journal of the American Medical Association arguing that the red shroud is something else entirely: an anatomically precise cross-section of the human brain. Once you see it, you cannot unsee it. The outline of the cloak traces the outer curve of the brain. A fold in the fabric forms the Sylvian fissure, the deep groove that separates the brain's major lobes. The angel curled beneath God is positioned exactly where the brainstem would be, and the green scarf trailing down becomes the vertebral artery. Even the pituitary gland and the optic chiasm, where the nerves from the eyes cross, fall precisely into place. This was not a man likely to invent such a thing by accident. Michelangelo had spent his youth secretly dissecting human corpses in a monastery in Florence, studying the body from the inside with an obsessiveness that, by one early account, exceeded that of professional anatomists... So what did he mean by it? Meshberger argued that the painting has been misnamed. He suggested it should be called not the Creation of Adam, but the Endowment of Adam. In the Bible, God gives Adam life. But in Michelangelo's fresco, Adam is already alive, his eyes open, his body lifted. What God is reaching across that famous gap to give him is not life. It is intellect. The divine spark of human thought itself, delivered, fittingly, from inside the very organ that produces it. One of the most looked-at images in the history of the world may contain a message that took half a millennium to be read, hidden by a man who understood both the human body and the human soul better than almost anyone who has ever lived, and who seems to have decided to bury his deepest idea about us where only the most careful eye would ever find it...

Coincidence? I don't think so. For nearly 500 years, hundreds of millions of people looked at the most famous painting of God ever made, and none of them noticed what was hiding in plain sight. Then, in 1990, a doctor looked up at the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel and realized that God is wrapped inside a human brain... The painting is Michelangelo's Creation of Adam, finished around 1512. You know the image even if you don't know its name: God reaching out from the heavens, His finger almost touching Adam's, the spark of life about to leap across the gap. But look at the shape around God, the swirling red cloak that holds Him and the angels aloft. For five centuries it was seen as just a billowing robe... but in 1990, a physician named Frank Lynn Meshberger published a paper in the Journal of the American Medical Association arguing that the red shroud is something else entirely: an anatomically precise cross-section of the human brain. Once you see it, you cannot unsee it. The outline of the cloak traces the outer curve of the brain. A fold in the fabric forms the Sylvian fissure, the deep groove that separates the brain's major lobes. The angel curled beneath God is positioned exactly where the brainstem would be, and the green scarf trailing down becomes the vertebral artery. Even the pituitary gland and the optic chiasm, where the nerves from the eyes cross, fall precisely into place. This was not a man likely to invent such a thing by accident. Michelangelo had spent his youth secretly dissecting human corpses in a monastery in Florence, studying the body from the inside with an obsessiveness that, by one early account, exceeded that of professional anatomists... So what did he mean by it? Meshberger argued that the painting has been misnamed. He suggested it should be called not the Creation of Adam, but the Endowment of Adam. In the Bible, God gives Adam life. But in Michelangelo's fresco, Adam is already alive, his eyes open, his body lifted. What God is reaching across that famous gap to give him is not life. It is intellect. The divine spark of human thought itself, delivered, fittingly, from inside the very organ that produces it. One of the most looked-at images in the history of the world may contain a message that took half a millennium to be read, hidden by a man who understood both the human body and the human soul better than almost anyone who has ever lived, and who seems to have decided to bury his deepest idea about us where only the most careful eye would ever find it...

James Lucas

558,450 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Vision is an absolute marvel of Divine Engineering. It requires a minimum of 3 systems working together from the start, or we don't see. 1. Eyes to capture light & convert into signals 2. Pathways to transport the signal 3. A brain to process it Evolution can't build it one step at a time, because there is no vision until all those systems exist and function together. Compounding the complexity further, each of those 3 systems themselves require a minimum number of more complex subsystems to function properly. For instance, all eyes require opsin proteins. Opsin is a highly complex protein that holds a special light-sensitive molecule called retinal; when a single photon hits the retinal, it instantly flips shape, triggering the opsin to change its 3D shape and trigger a precise cascade which converts the light into an electrical signal to be sent to the brain where it can be understood as vision. Opsin alone, is useless. It needs the retinal molecule plus the full cascade, or it does nothing. This is the case with ALL vision systems, confirmed over and over again the lab. No partially formed system produces any vision, or any other function for that matter. Many uninformed Evolutionists attempt to argue that we see different levels of complexity in vision systems, which they say is evidence that vision evolved gradually from simpler systems. But the evolutionary scientists themselves refute this. Even the very simplest possible system of vision - the infamous "light sensitive cell" - still relies on a similar highly complex, interconnected network of proteins and other molecules. Mainstream evolutionary science even teaches that vision systems evolved independently, from scratch, at least 40 different times. The reason is because many vision systems are so different, operating with such unique parts, that one simply could not have evolved from another. The fossil record itself refutes the concept of step by step construction of vision systems. Complex eyes appear early in the fossil record, fully formed & functional. There is no increasing complexity in the fossil record - it's a complete contradiction of evolutionary predictions. The vision system has all the Hallmark evidence of design. A complex, interconnected web of information processing systems with incomprehensibly precise timing & coordination between them all to produce a highly specialized function. Nature does not, and cannot, produce such a system, not with all the time and resources in the entire universe. Everything you see is a testament to the Power of our Creator.

Vision is an absolute marvel of Divine Engineering. It requires a minimum of 3 systems working together from the start, or we don't see. 1. Eyes to capture light & convert into signals 2. Pathways to transport the signal 3. A brain to process it Evolution can't build it one step at a time, because there is no vision until all those systems exist and function together. Compounding the complexity further, each of those 3 systems themselves require a minimum number of more complex subsystems to function properly. For instance, all eyes require opsin proteins. Opsin is a highly complex protein that holds a special light-sensitive molecule called retinal; when a single photon hits the retinal, it instantly flips shape, triggering the opsin to change its 3D shape and trigger a precise cascade which converts the light into an electrical signal to be sent to the brain where it can be understood as vision. Opsin alone, is useless. It needs the retinal molecule plus the full cascade, or it does nothing. This is the case with ALL vision systems, confirmed over and over again the lab. No partially formed system produces any vision, or any other function for that matter. Many uninformed Evolutionists attempt to argue that we see different levels of complexity in vision systems, which they say is evidence that vision evolved gradually from simpler systems. But the evolutionary scientists themselves refute this. Even the very simplest possible system of vision - the infamous "light sensitive cell" - still relies on a similar highly complex, interconnected network of proteins and other molecules. Mainstream evolutionary science even teaches that vision systems evolved independently, from scratch, at least 40 different times. The reason is because many vision systems are so different, operating with such unique parts, that one simply could not have evolved from another. The fossil record itself refutes the concept of step by step construction of vision systems. Complex eyes appear early in the fossil record, fully formed & functional. There is no increasing complexity in the fossil record - it's a complete contradiction of evolutionary predictions. The vision system has all the Hallmark evidence of design. A complex, interconnected web of information processing systems with incomprehensibly precise timing & coordination between them all to produce a highly specialized function. Nature does not, and cannot, produce such a system, not with all the time and resources in the entire universe. Everything you see is a testament to the Power of our Creator.

Divinely Designed

20,286 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

😳 Autistic and hyper-creative = adaptive de-evolution ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆 is saying in this video that what we now label as “autistic” or “hyper-creative” is a biological fallback mode caused by broken light signaling into the thalamus, the brain’s main sensory gatekeeper. The brain adapts to survive, but it does so by narrowing perception, not expanding it. First, let’s understand in a simple way what the thalamus actually does. Think of the thalamus as the gatekeeper of reality. It decides what reaches consciousness and what doesn’t. When light and timing break, the gate fails, chaos rushes in, and it can’t decide anymore. What Jack means by “de-evolution” is not an insult. It is a directional statement. Evolution means: better integration wider perception more efficient energy use De-evolution means: less integration narrower perception higher energy cost These are adaptations, not upgrades. The brain is saying: “I cannot process the full signal, so I will amplify one narrow channel to survive.” Is this good or bad for our race? 🤷🏻‍♀️ Depends if we get a world full of Dr Jack… or a world full of very low IQs 👀 Why is the thalamus the key? Because it is light-dependent. It is built to synchronize: retina suprachiasmatic nucleus (our master clock) cortex mitochondria When light signaling is distorted by: blue light at night lack of sunrise EMFs (electromagnetic fields) poor DHA (docosahexaenoic acid, a brain fat antenna) loss of darkness the thalamus loses timing accuracy. Timing is everything 🙌🏻 in biology. Lose timing and: sensory gating fails social integration collapses context disappears 🧐 Why does creativity often appear with autism? Here is the paradox. When the thalamic gate narrows, the brain blocks social noise, emotional complexity, and contextual clutter, but over-amplifies internal pattern recognition. That is why some autistic individuals are brilliant at math, music, code, or art, but struggle with social reality. It is not higher consciousness. It is selective survival wiring. In the same way, a major brain injury can rewire the brain and the person suddenly becomes a “genius”. We humans evolved to be contextual, social, rhythmic, and time-aware. A brain that cannot: ❌ track circadian rhythm ❌ integrate multisensory input ❌ read emotional timing is less adapted to the natural world, not more. The uncomfortable truth is that our “progress” changed: ✅ the light ✅ the magnetism ✅ the water ✅ the timing The brain adapted to survive the mismatch. That adaptation saved lives, but it is not evolution forward. Even geniuses like Nikola Tesla, by giving us AC (alternating current), delivered an atomic bomb to our biology. Why does this matter for us? Because the solution is not pills or therapy. It is REDOX plus less wrong progress. Fix the input and the thalamus recalibrates. The brain regains timing. 🫣 I know what Jack is saying is radical, but it is internally consistent with the signals humanity has lived under, from Mother Nature and Father Sun. For the last 25,000 years, humans have been adapting to artificial, alien environments, and that “👽” is the result of de-evolution. 🧥 Take clothing, for example. It is not neutral. Skin is not just a cover. Skin is a solar antenna. It senses sunlight, temperature, magnetism, and season. When we lived naked or minimally clothed, the skin talked directly to mitochondria 👍🏻 When we started wearing clothes, that conversation was muted 👎🏻 Clothing is not culture 😬 it is insulation from environmental truth. 🙇🏻‍♀️ Here is the key idea people miss. Creativity often appears when the environment no longer gives clear instructions. When the external signal is weak, the brain turns inward. Can we fix it with redox? In my opinion, redox does not remove “gifts”, it removes chaos. When chaos is gone, the brain no longer has to compensate so hard, and massive improvement, or even reversal, becomes possible. Full interview 👇🏻

😳 Autistic and hyper-creative = adaptive de-evolution ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆 is saying in this video that what we now label as “autistic” or “hyper-creative” is a biological fallback mode caused by broken light signaling into the thalamus, the brain’s main sensory gatekeeper. The brain adapts to survive, but it does so by narrowing perception, not expanding it. First, let’s understand in a simple way what the thalamus actually does. Think of the thalamus as the gatekeeper of reality. It decides what reaches consciousness and what doesn’t. When light and timing break, the gate fails, chaos rushes in, and it can’t decide anymore. What Jack means by “de-evolution” is not an insult. It is a directional statement. Evolution means: better integration wider perception more efficient energy use De-evolution means: less integration narrower perception higher energy cost These are adaptations, not upgrades. The brain is saying: “I cannot process the full signal, so I will amplify one narrow channel to survive.” Is this good or bad for our race? 🤷🏻‍♀️ Depends if we get a world full of Dr Jack… or a world full of very low IQs 👀 Why is the thalamus the key? Because it is light-dependent. It is built to synchronize: retina suprachiasmatic nucleus (our master clock) cortex mitochondria When light signaling is distorted by: blue light at night lack of sunrise EMFs (electromagnetic fields) poor DHA (docosahexaenoic acid, a brain fat antenna) loss of darkness the thalamus loses timing accuracy. Timing is everything 🙌🏻 in biology. Lose timing and: sensory gating fails social integration collapses context disappears 🧐 Why does creativity often appear with autism? Here is the paradox. When the thalamic gate narrows, the brain blocks social noise, emotional complexity, and contextual clutter, but over-amplifies internal pattern recognition. That is why some autistic individuals are brilliant at math, music, code, or art, but struggle with social reality. It is not higher consciousness. It is selective survival wiring. In the same way, a major brain injury can rewire the brain and the person suddenly becomes a “genius”. We humans evolved to be contextual, social, rhythmic, and time-aware. A brain that cannot: ❌ track circadian rhythm ❌ integrate multisensory input ❌ read emotional timing is less adapted to the natural world, not more. The uncomfortable truth is that our “progress” changed: ✅ the light ✅ the magnetism ✅ the water ✅ the timing The brain adapted to survive the mismatch. That adaptation saved lives, but it is not evolution forward. Even geniuses like Nikola Tesla, by giving us AC (alternating current), delivered an atomic bomb to our biology. Why does this matter for us? Because the solution is not pills or therapy. It is REDOX plus less wrong progress. Fix the input and the thalamus recalibrates. The brain regains timing. 🫣 I know what Jack is saying is radical, but it is internally consistent with the signals humanity has lived under, from Mother Nature and Father Sun. For the last 25,000 years, humans have been adapting to artificial, alien environments, and that “👽” is the result of de-evolution. 🧥 Take clothing, for example. It is not neutral. Skin is not just a cover. Skin is a solar antenna. It senses sunlight, temperature, magnetism, and season. When we lived naked or minimally clothed, the skin talked directly to mitochondria 👍🏻 When we started wearing clothes, that conversation was muted 👎🏻 Clothing is not culture 😬 it is insulation from environmental truth. 🙇🏻‍♀️ Here is the key idea people miss. Creativity often appears when the environment no longer gives clear instructions. When the external signal is weak, the brain turns inward. Can we fix it with redox? In my opinion, redox does not remove “gifts”, it removes chaos. When chaos is gone, the brain no longer has to compensate so hard, and massive improvement, or even reversal, becomes possible. Full interview 👇🏻

Light Me Away ☀️

16,508 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten