Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Performing irreversible puberty blocker trials on children is wrong. It’s madness that the Gvt have banned social media for U16s but believe 11 year olds can consent to changes that will affect them forever. This is what happens when you have a Gvt unhinged from any principle. Sign our...

55,743 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

32 Kommentare

Profilbild von India Willoughby
India Willoughbyvor 3 Monaten

Puberty blockers are absoluteky reversible, you utter pumpkin. C!s kids take them. Zero ill effects. Nobody in the world has been harmed by a puberty blocker. I’ll tell you what IS cruel and irreversible Laura: Forcing a trans kid to go through the puberty they explicitly do NOT want. Leaving them in a body which makes stand out as a target, for you and your friends.

Profilbild von Veronika
Veronikavor 3 Monaten

You're lying

Profilbild von Gyll King Post Skip Diplomacy
Gyll King Post Skip Diplomacyvor 3 Monaten

But this isn’t true is it?

Profilbild von Phoebe Truth Ⓐ☮︎
Phoebe Truth Ⓐ☮︎vor 3 Monaten

Trans adults are are also children at some point. Ask them if they would have rather not have to go through all that trauma and future surgery to feel comfortable in their bodies and to not be so harrassed by bigots like you. This anti-trans ideology is built on lies and the erasure of real people’s lives

Profilbild von 🏳️‍⚧️Champion Hotdog Eater🏳️‍⚧️
🏳️‍⚧️Champion Hotdog Eater🏳️‍⚧️vor 3 Monaten

Puberty brings deeply distressing irreversible changes trans kids are stuck with til they die. The whole point of PBs is to provide a breathing space without forcing them to endure irreversible changes, you fucking dimwit.

Profilbild von Donna-Louise
Donna-Louisevor 3 Monaten

Well done, shame on Labour and Greens. History will judge them all, and it won't be kind.

Profilbild von Helénas world
Helénas worldvor 3 Monaten

You can't use the under 16 social media ban, as we all know that has nothing to do with kids, but digital ID for adults! You're a fucking terf clown! We all know this!!!!

Profilbild von TheTransTroll
TheTransTrollvor 3 Monaten

You’re very gullible aren’t you? You’ve been told by a bunch of people that don’t like trans people that these will damage kids because they don’t like trans people and don’t want them to transition.

Profilbild von Betsy
Betsyvor 3 Monaten

This is utter misinformation and you know it. Shame on you. Be better.

Profilbild von Number 10 Downing Street CCTV
Number 10 Downing Street CCTVvor 3 Monaten

Laura, please familiarise yourself with how puberty blockers work and how they are used to treat precocious puberty. I'll give you a headstart - when people stop taking them, puberty happens. You're welcome.

Profilbild von Kathryn Porter
Kathryn Portervor 3 Monaten

@zatzi Unhinged

Profilbild von Adam Hibbert
Adam Hibbertvor 3 Monaten

Still can't believe the Tories let this roll unimpeded for 14 years.

Profilbild von CurlyBloxks 🦁💭
CurlyBloxks 🦁💭vor 3 Monaten

why dont you listen to the people in the trans community their stories matter you are choosing to listen to people like @HJoyceGender who is not even part of the LGBTQ community or has any qualifications in this area.....if they are harmful ban them for all not just trans kids

Profilbild von Stewart Green
Stewart Greenvor 3 Monaten

You were cheering on state intrusion in our lives the other day and now you’re not so keen on it? I’m so confused

Profilbild von Izzy 🐀
Izzy 🐀vor 3 Monaten

Ironic

Profilbild von Craig
Craigvor 3 Monaten

Puberty blockers aren't irreversible. Puberty is irreversible. You thick Tory cunt

Profilbild von Simon Kelly
Simon Kellyvor 3 Monaten

But they ARE reversible, aren't they Laura. But then, you knew that, didn't you. Is Lam, Courtinho and Whately on their holidays and you're covering their jobs? Do you think people haven't noticed that the four of you have been tasked with spreading these very embarrassing lies?

Profilbild von Jane
Janevor 3 Monaten

But didn’t Kemi and the Conservatives also back social media restrictions/bans for under 16s? She wrote a Guardian article titled "As a parent and a Conservative, I know that banning social media for under 16s is the right thing to do" back in Jan 2026 arguing parents can’t do it alone and the state needs to step in. Good Morning Britain this month, she’s defended the government’s ban while explaining her own strict rules for her kids (no social media, phone curfews, etc.). If The Tories think kids can’t handle social media, how on earth can they consent to irreversible puberty blockers? Both parties have been inconsistent on protecting children from adult decisions.

Profilbild von Muttley
Muttleyvor 3 Monaten

@LucyTrims They’re not irreversible and they happened when you were in Government. Why lie?

Profilbild von Ian Barnes
Ian Barnesvor 3 Monaten

Reminder that puberty blockers for younger adolescents were first introduced through a 2011 Tavistock trial under the Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition, before NHS eligibility was expanded in 2014.

Profilbild von Debs
Debsvor 3 Monaten

A conservative MP, so a blatant lier.

Profilbild von James Antonie
James Antonievor 3 Monaten

Not only wrong, it is Madness. Ask Grandma

Profilbild von ManchesterSalfordLGBTQ
ManchesterSalfordLGBTQvor 3 Monaten

It’s reversible 🥴

Profilbild von Dr.Stanley Goldstein
Dr.Stanley Goldsteinvor 3 Monaten

Both men and women have male and female psychological characteristics with some men being more maternal than typical and some women being more assertive on the job than is common. But this does not change their biological sex. Ignorance of child psychological development and the normal turmoil of adolescence is widespread.

Profilbild von Jambo
Jambovor 3 Monaten

@LisaFranci84133 Honestly, people on the Left have no moral conscience. Weirdos.

Profilbild von Wilson Codling
Wilson Codlingvor 3 Monaten

I know you are a Tory, so lying comes naturally to you. But puberty blockers are NOT irreversible. What’s more you know perfectly well that the children that are part of the study are not going in alone, they’ll be with their parents

Profilbild von Roe Fooking Oneal
Roe Fooking Onealvor 3 Monaten

They're not irreversible and you're an absolute demonstrable moron.

Profilbild von KKS
KKSvor 3 Monaten

PATHWAYS TRIAL requires consent from a parent/legal guardian for a young person to participate

Profilbild von Jack Fennell 🏳️‍⚧️
Jack Fennell 🏳️‍⚧️vor 3 Monaten

Stop giving her the benefit of the doubt, folks. She's not gullible; she's not misinformed; she's lying.

Profilbild von Kendall Evilmom 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🖖 she/her 🖕🏻
Kendall Evilmom 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🖖 she/her 🖕🏻vor 3 Monaten

You know you’re stupid when you’re just talking out your ass. Puberty blockers have been used for over five decades. They were created for children as young as four. They cause zero long-term damage. We’ve already had drug trials. And 50 years of experience. 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈

Profilbild von Swiper the Fox 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿ΜΟΛΩΝΛΑΒΕ🛡️
Swiper the Fox 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿ΜΟΛΩΝΛΑΒΕ🛡️vor 3 Monaten

Do you even do media training? Waving your finger in someone's face like a school mistress is ghastly even if your point is obvious

Profilbild von Death
Deathvor 3 Monaten

Why is the UK terrible? I don't understand it. UK needs new leadership. Children are not experimental guinea pigs @10DowningStreet @CourtNewsUK @ukhomeoffice

Ähnliche Videos

“We’ve got a current Labour government headed by Keir Starmer at the moment and potentially in future headed by Andy Burnham makes no difference because both of them appear to have the same view on this and therefore the Labour government’s view won’t change and that is that they’ve decided that they can ban 16 year olds from accessing social media due to the vulnerability of their minds and how social media may well indeed manipulate their minds and due to that vulnerability. The Labour Party doesn’t want 16 or under accessing social media. Meanwhile, an 11 year old, according to the Labour Party, does have the mental capacity to decide that they are not a boy or that they are not a girl, that they’ve been born in the wrong body and that they can irreversibly alter the way that their body grows their sexual organs by stopping and blocking puberty chemically. So an 11 year old can make that decision. But at the same time, a 16 or 15 year old can’t access social media. It is a very, very strange position that the Labour government has taken, explained by the facts, of course, as you saw Andy Burnham there giving £100,000 as a grant as mayor of Manchester to an organisation that was lobbying for this change. Also explained by the fact that Keir Starmer and the Labour government clearly don’t care about the mental wellbeing of children, otherwise they wouldn’t be allowing 11 year olds to block their own puberty. And so this online safety in 16 year olds, what that’s really about is introducing digital ID for every single citizen by stealth, using the name of the children and protecting the children as the excuse.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

أبو عمّار

18,378 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten