正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Prof. David Krakauer says intelligence is not knowledge. True intelligence is doing more with less. Solving problems without knowing everything. LLMs do the opposite. They do more with more. LLMs are libraries that know everything.

vitrupo

33,550 subscribers

80,482 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Eric Weinstein says we're more or less LLMs. Most of life runs on script: greetings, replies, small talk, all on pre-trained loops. That's why they mimic us so well. “We don't realize that intelligence is a last resort for us.”

Eric Weinstein says we're more or less LLMs. Most of life runs on script: greetings, replies, small talk, all on pre-trained loops. That's why they mimic us so well. “We don't realize that intelligence is a last resort for us.”

vitrupo

132,059 次观看 • 11 个月前

Yann LeCun says LLMs are not a bubble in value or investment; they will power many useful apps and justify big infra The bubble is believing LLMs alone will reach human-level intelligence Progress needs breakthroughs, not just more data/compute "we're missing something big"

Yann LeCun says LLMs are not a bubble in value or investment; they will power many useful apps and justify big infra The bubble is believing LLMs alone will reach human-level intelligence Progress needs breakthroughs, not just more data/compute "we're missing something big"

Haider.

321,406 次观看 • 7 个月前

Yann LeCun says we're fooled by LLMs because they manipulate language well, and we associate that with intelligence But language fluency doesn't mean underlying intelligence Every generation since the 1950s claimed its technique was the ticket to human-level AI All were wrong. "this generation with LLMs is also wrong"

Yann LeCun says we're fooled by LLMs because they manipulate language well, and we associate that with intelligence But language fluency doesn't mean underlying intelligence Every generation since the 1950s claimed its technique was the ticket to human-level AI All were wrong. "this generation with LLMs is also wrong"

Haider.

625,361 次观看 • 6 个月前

Andrej Karpathy beautifully explains the fundamental difference of learning between a human and an LLM. > “The book I’m reading is a set of prompts for me to do synthetic data generation. It's by manipulating that information that you actually gain that knowledge. We have no equivalent of that with LLMs; they don't really do that.” many of the best minds in this field think LLMs are not really learning anything, and therefore are incapable of surpassing human-level intelligence.

Andrej Karpathy beautifully explains the fundamental difference of learning between a human and an LLM. > “The book I’m reading is a set of prompts for me to do synthetic data generation. It's by manipulating that information that you actually gain that knowledge. We have no equivalent of that with LLMs; they don't really do that.” many of the best minds in this field think LLMs are not really learning anything, and therefore are incapable of surpassing human-level intelligence.

ℏεsam

895,001 次观看 • 7 个月前

Destiny explains his issue with Asmon’s political analysis “Same limitations that exist with LLMs also exists with ppl that do online politics and if the data set is sh*t then the answers are sh*t..Asmon is above intelligence..problem is, he’s R worded”

Destiny explains his issue with Asmon’s political analysis “Same limitations that exist with LLMs also exists with ppl that do online politics and if the data set is sht then the answers are sht..Asmon is above intelligence..problem is, he’s R worded”

yeet

212,111 次观看 • 10 个月前

David Silver says human data is AI's fossil fuel. "We mine it and burn it in our LLMs." It gave us a head start -- but it will run out. The sustainable path is reinforcement learning: systems that learn from experience, generate more, and keep learning.

David Silver says human data is AI's fossil fuel. "We mine it and burn it in our LLMs." It gave us a head start -- but it will run out. The sustainable path is reinforcement learning: systems that learn from experience, generate more, and keep learning.

vitrupo

20,190 次观看 • 1 年前

Anil Seth says we confuse consciousness with language. We don’t ask if AlphaFold is conscious, and we under-attribute consciousness to animals because they don’t speak. And we attribute it to LLMs because they do. We’re reacting to signals, not minds.

Anil Seth says we confuse consciousness with language. We don’t ask if AlphaFold is conscious, and we under-attribute consciousness to animals because they don’t speak. And we attribute it to LLMs because they do. We’re reacting to signals, not minds.

vitrupo

16,330 次观看 • 2 个月前

AI (LLMs) vs. Google Search They are not the same, and knowing the difference is crucial

AI (LLMs) vs. Google Search They are not the same, and knowing the difference is crucial

Harper Carroll

33,340 次观看 • 7 个月前

Sari Azout says the term “artificial intelligence” is a branding error from 1955. LLMs aren't artificial. They're collective intelligence: just better ways of aggregating what humans already know and have made. “Changing your vocabulary can change your reality.” Maybe the fear around AI doesn't come from what it does, but from what we've chosen to call it.

Sari Azout says the term “artificial intelligence” is a branding error from 1955. LLMs aren't artificial. They're collective intelligence: just better ways of aggregating what humans already know and have made. “Changing your vocabulary can change your reality.” Maybe the fear around AI doesn't come from what it does, but from what we've chosen to call it.

vitrupo

123,566 次观看 • 11 个月前

Yann LeCun says the real world is far more complex than the world of language LLMs can accumulate knowledge, but they fail with high-dimensional, continuous, noisy sensory data "the next revolution is physical AI" Systems that can truly plan, reason, and understand the physical environment

Yann LeCun says the real world is far more complex than the world of language LLMs can accumulate knowledge, but they fail with high-dimensional, continuous, noisy sensory data "the next revolution is physical AI" Systems that can truly plan, reason, and understand the physical environment

Haider.

66,616 次观看 • 4 个月前

A large portion of animal intelligence doesn't require any learning, claims Andrej Karpathy: it's baked into DNA. AI models, by contrast, start from random weights. They have to learn their intelligence, mostly by imitating the internet. This is so different that Andrej thinks it's a fundamentally different kind of intelligence: LLMs are more like ghosts than animals.

A large portion of animal intelligence doesn't require any learning, claims Andrej Karpathy: it's baked into DNA. AI models, by contrast, start from random weights. They have to learn their intelligence, mostly by imitating the internet. This is so different that Andrej thinks it's a fundamentally different kind of intelligence: LLMs are more like ghosts than animals.

Dwarkesh Patel

81,313 次观看 • 17 天前

The real moat is not more prompts. It is more expertise. OptimAI is turning community knowledge into live persona agents - systems that can think with domain context, not guess with generic intelligence. That is how a network becomes infrastructure. 💡 --- 🔥 Explore what others are building. And start build your own agent. 💡 Quick tip: Start with one niche you know deeply. The best agents are built from real experience, not broad assumptions.

The real moat is not more prompts. It is more expertise. OptimAI is turning community knowledge into live persona agents - systems that can think with domain context, not guess with generic intelligence. That is how a network becomes infrastructure. 💡 --- 🔥 Explore what others are building. And start build your own agent. 💡 Quick tip: Start with one niche you know deeply. The best agents are built from real experience, not broad assumptions.

OptimAI Network

15,841 次观看 • 11 天前

Andrej Karpathy says AI is the new electricity. > CAPEX for training models like building power plants. > OPEX for serving intelligence through APIs like grid distribution. > Metered access by tokens like your electric bill. "When LLMs go down, it's like an intelligence brownout in the world. The planet just gets dumber."

Andrej Karpathy says AI is the new electricity. > CAPEX for training models like building power plants. > OPEX for serving intelligence through APIs like grid distribution. > Metered access by tokens like your electric bill. "When LLMs go down, it's like an intelligence brownout in the world. The planet just gets dumber."

vitrupo

39,636 次观看 • 11 个月前

Yann LeCun says you cannot build a reliable agentic system without a world model LLMs don't have world models. They can't predict the consequences of their actions before taking them "they just act, and whatever happens next is someone else's problem" Without that, it's not intelligence

Yann LeCun says you cannot build a reliable agentic system without a world model LLMs don't have world models. They can't predict the consequences of their actions before taking them "they just act, and whatever happens next is someone else's problem" Without that, it's not intelligence

Haider.

330,555 次观看 • 1 个月前

"I don’t think we have any evidence that complexity or intelligence is required for consciousness." Annaka Harris says arguing whether AI will be conscious misses a deeper point: intelligence and creativity might have nothing to do with sentience. AI might surpass us creatively without experiencing anything at all.

"I don’t think we have any evidence that complexity or intelligence is required for consciousness." Annaka Harris says arguing whether AI will be conscious misses a deeper point: intelligence and creativity might have nothing to do with sentience. AI might surpass us creatively without experiencing anything at all.

vitrupo

45,436 次观看 • 1 年前

Yann LeCun says language isn’t intelligence. Predicting text doesn’t mean understanding reality. The real world is messy, physical, and causal and today’s LLMs barely touch that. The next leap is Physical AI: world models, cause and effect, real planning. Do you think LLMs can evolve into this, or do we need a completely new architecture?

Yann LeCun says language isn’t intelligence. Predicting text doesn’t mean understanding reality. The real world is messy, physical, and causal and today’s LLMs barely touch that. The next leap is Physical AI: world models, cause and effect, real planning. Do you think LLMs can evolve into this, or do we need a completely new architecture?

VraserX e/acc

76,154 次观看 • 4 个月前

The far left, unelected officials, and media want you to focus more on who is solving the problems than the problems they are solving.

The far left, unelected officials, and media want you to focus more on who is solving the problems than the problems they are solving.

Kaizen D. Asiedu

1,166,027 次观看 • 1 年前

Ilya Sutskever says AI could cure disease, extend life, and accelerate science beyond imagination. But if it can do that, what else can it do? “The problem with AI is that it is so powerful. It can also do everything.” We don't know what's coming. We must prepare, together.

Ilya Sutskever says AI could cure disease, extend life, and accelerate science beyond imagination. But if it can do that, what else can it do? “The problem with AI is that it is so powerful. It can also do everything.” We don't know what's coming. We must prepare, together.

vitrupo

97,402 次观看 • 11 个月前

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman says the future isn't UBI. It's UBP -- universal basic provision: abundant intelligence as the new currency. You won't need more money, because knowledge won’t be something you buy. Not cash. Capability.

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman says the future isn't UBI. It's UBP -- universal basic provision: abundant intelligence as the new currency. You won't need more money, because knowledge won’t be something you buy. Not cash. Capability.

vitrupo

251,582 次观看 • 1 年前