Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

💥Retired FBI Special Agent Michael Easter was was blocked from testifying at the Karen Read trial by Auntie Bev. He says all eyes should be on Higgins. “I really feel strongly about investigating Brian Higgins.” ~ Michael Easter

JoeyBagaD🍩nuts

9,475 subscribers

40,703 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Komedi Haberler & Politika Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

“I really feel strongly about investigating Brian Higgins” #KarenRead FBI expert Michael Easter breaks down what should have been done in this case

“I really feel strongly about investigating Brian Higgins” #KarenRead FBI expert Michael Easter breaks down what should have been done in this case

Lawyer You Know

190,831 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Recently retired FBI Special Agent, Michael Easter, on the federal investigation: “I wouldn’t rule out that something’s still going to come.” Q: Do you think the Feds were watching this second trial? “I know they were watching it because I was informed they were aware that I was going to testify, and wanted to know if I was going to testify about anything I knew about the investigation prior to leaving the Bureau.” Make no mistake, the Department of Justice is still all over John O’Keefe’s murder. No wonder Judge Bev wanted to keep Mike Easter from testifying. ————— Justice Served Linda Kenney Baden (she/her) Michel Bryant #KarenRead

Recently retired FBI Special Agent, Michael Easter, on the federal investigation: “I wouldn’t rule out that something’s still going to come.” Q: Do you think the Feds were watching this second trial? “I know they were watching it because I was informed they were aware that I was going to testify, and wanted to know if I was going to testify about anything I knew about the investigation prior to leaving the Bureau.” Make no mistake, the Department of Justice is still all over John O’Keefe’s murder. No wonder Judge Bev wanted to keep Mike Easter from testifying. ————— Justice Served Linda Kenney Baden (she/her) Michel Bryant #KarenRead

Olivia

83,548 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

And THIS is why Brian Higgins should have been/should STILL BE investigated. Mike Easter saw it and this is what we all saw as well. He is/was SUSPICIOUS, period. If the FBI has truly closed the case, that's a miscarriage of justice. #KarenReadFreed #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe

And THIS is why Brian Higgins should have been/should STILL BE investigated. Mike Easter saw it and this is what we all saw as well. He is/was SUSPICIOUS, period. If the FBI has truly closed the case, that's a miscarriage of justice. #KarenReadFreed #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe

That Girl T

52,790 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

💥Smug Brian Higgins smirks while dismissing the idea that he & Brian Albert’s 22 second phone call was anything of substance. A FEW MOMENTS LATER.. Bev to Higgins Lawyer: “I wanna give you a chance to speak with your client” Higgins Lawyer: “I can do it in about 10 seconds”

💥Smug Brian Higgins smirks while dismissing the idea that he & Brian Albert’s 22 second phone call was anything of substance. A FEW MOMENTS LATER.. Bev to Higgins Lawyer: “I wanna give you a chance to speak with your client” Higgins Lawyer: “I can do it in about 10 seconds”

JoeyBagaD🍩nuts

36,508 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Michael Easter, a retired FBI special agent questions why the MSP did not subpoena Google in the murder case of Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. A Google subpoena could have definitively resolved the 2.27 a.m. search issue. If Jennifer McCabe did not make the search, Google’s server logs would have been the strongest proof. Instead, they chose to rely on debated and confusing internal forensics. Jessica Hyde reported in May 2023 that the search existed and was deleted, then later issued a Cellebrite-only report after Ian Whiffin’s software updates removed the timestamp, even though other programs still showed the 2.27 a.m. search, as per Greene, Karen Read’s forensic expert, a point Whiffin agreed with. Subpoenaing Google would have put the facts with a neutral third party, so it was avoided. That absence speaks volumes. Michael Easter was a powerful witness for Karen, hence Auntie Bev denied his testimony. This was not incompetence. It was corruption.

Michael Easter, a retired FBI special agent questions why the MSP did not subpoena Google in the murder case of Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. A Google subpoena could have definitively resolved the 2.27 a.m. search issue. If Jennifer McCabe did not make the search, Google’s server logs would have been the strongest proof. Instead, they chose to rely on debated and confusing internal forensics. Jessica Hyde reported in May 2023 that the search existed and was deleted, then later issued a Cellebrite-only report after Ian Whiffin’s software updates removed the timestamp, even though other programs still showed the 2.27 a.m. search, as per Greene, Karen Read’s forensic expert, a point Whiffin agreed with. Subpoenaing Google would have put the facts with a neutral third party, so it was avoided. That absence speaks volumes. Michael Easter was a powerful witness for Karen, hence Auntie Bev denied his testimony. This was not incompetence. It was corruption.

Lara

83,890 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Michael Easter discusses Jen McCabe’s Google search. He would’ve used Google reverse search warrants and keyword + search term warrants. Google returns a list of users who searched for those terms during that time period, and the timestamps each search was entered (via Google’s servers). Google’s servers don’t record one’s iPhone’s safari tab manipulation data, so an entry of “hos long to die in cold” made on Jen McCabe’s iPhone, at or before 2:27:40am on January 29, 2022, is definitive proof of its occurrence. ————— Be sure to check out Justice Served’s YouTube channel, where Linda Kenney Baden (she/her) and Michel Bryant bring on exceptional guests, including Michael Easter, a retired FBI Special Agent of 20 years, to discuss the Karen Read case.

Michael Easter discusses Jen McCabe’s Google search. He would’ve used Google reverse search warrants and keyword + search term warrants. Google returns a list of users who searched for those terms during that time period, and the timestamps each search was entered (via Google’s servers). Google’s servers don’t record one’s iPhone’s safari tab manipulation data, so an entry of “hos long to die in cold” made on Jen McCabe’s iPhone, at or before 2:27:40am on January 29, 2022, is definitive proof of its occurrence. ————— Be sure to check out Justice Served’s YouTube channel, where Linda Kenney Baden (she/her) and Michel Bryant bring on exceptional guests, including Michael Easter, a retired FBI Special Agent of 20 years, to discuss the Karen Read case.

Olivia

98,950 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

DISPROVING KAREN READ'S DEFENSE: BRIAN HIGGINS Karen Read and her legal team have propped up their insane third party culprit theory with a self-constructed romantic fantasy between Read and Higgins that did not exist in reality. As revealed in the first trial, Read and Brian Higgins had exchanged several awkward texts, shared an odd kiss, and met at Higgins apartment in what Higgins explained was an uncomfortable visit after Read had been out drinking with a friend. Read was the initiator and aggressor in all these instances. The last communication between the two occurred the evening of January 23rd with Read texting "Phone works ↔️". Higgins responded "Thought you were all set". This is not the response of a man madly in love with a woman and pining for her and certainly not the response one would expect from a man so blindly enamored he was willing to murder a friend to take his place. Instead what we see is a detached response. The next reply was from Read with her stating "With talking? No.." It is Read's response here that indicates she is the one with interest. Not convinced, Higgins responds "Hmmmm. Well" to which Read does not respond. If Higgins truly wanted Read, he would have continued texting that night pushing to rekindle but their communication stops until he sees her the night of the 28th. She was out of sight, out of mind for him. The "Ummm. Well" he texted her that night lends itself far more to a drunk text than how the defense has categorized it as an angry response from being rebuffed, which he hadn't been. Higgins summed up his interactions with Read as strange, "uncomfortable" and as having a "weird vibe". This was not a man who was in love with Read and the notion he would even exchange one heated word with John over Read is beyond ludicrous.

DISPROVING KAREN READ'S DEFENSE: BRIAN HIGGINS Karen Read and her legal team have propped up their insane third party culprit theory with a self-constructed romantic fantasy between Read and Higgins that did not exist in reality. As revealed in the first trial, Read and Brian Higgins had exchanged several awkward texts, shared an odd kiss, and met at Higgins apartment in what Higgins explained was an uncomfortable visit after Read had been out drinking with a friend. Read was the initiator and aggressor in all these instances. The last communication between the two occurred the evening of January 23rd with Read texting "Phone works ↔️". Higgins responded "Thought you were all set". This is not the response of a man madly in love with a woman and pining for her and certainly not the response one would expect from a man so blindly enamored he was willing to murder a friend to take his place. Instead what we see is a detached response. The next reply was from Read with her stating "With talking? No.." It is Read's response here that indicates she is the one with interest. Not convinced, Higgins responds "Hmmmm. Well" to which Read does not respond. If Higgins truly wanted Read, he would have continued texting that night pushing to rekindle but their communication stops until he sees her the night of the 28th. She was out of sight, out of mind for him. The "Ummm. Well" he texted her that night lends itself far more to a drunk text than how the defense has categorized it as an angry response from being rebuffed, which he hadn't been. Higgins summed up his interactions with Read as strange, "uncomfortable" and as having a "weird vibe". This was not a man who was in love with Read and the notion he would even exchange one heated word with John over Read is beyond ludicrous.

Julie Carpenter

16,137 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Karen Read's defense team filed a motion today that included new video of Brian Higgins at CPD, which was withheld from them in the first trial. The surveillance video shows Brian Higgins pacing around outside, talking to someone on his phone at 1:34 AM. He NEVER mentioned speaking to anyone on the phone at the trial, or at the state or federal grand jury. Had he done so the defense could've filed a Rule 17 motion for his phone, which would be a lot stronger and less likely to be deemed a "fishing expedition" if they had video of him talking on the phone. He testified at trial that he was back home in West Roxbury by 1:40, and that it took 15-20 minutes to get there. This was all a lie, as was his excuse for being at CPD in the first place. This is a Brady violation.

Karen Read's defense team filed a motion today that included new video of Brian Higgins at CPD, which was withheld from them in the first trial. The surveillance video shows Brian Higgins pacing around outside, talking to someone on his phone at 1:34 AM. He NEVER mentioned speaking to anyone on the phone at the trial, or at the state or federal grand jury. Had he done so the defense could've filed a Rule 17 motion for his phone, which would be a lot stronger and less likely to be deemed a "fishing expedition" if they had video of him talking on the phone. He testified at trial that he was back home in West Roxbury by 1:40, and that it took 15-20 minutes to get there. This was all a lie, as was his excuse for being at CPD in the first place. This is a Brady violation.

Aidan Kearney

305,625 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

If Brian Higgins was physically at Canton PD at 9:26 AM on January 29, why wasn’t he interviewed by State Police then and why did they wait days? Brian Higgins arrives at Canton Police Department at 9:26 AM Yuri Bukhenik testifies he arrives around 9:15 AM Michael Proctor is already there Higgins is a law-enforcement officer a known attendee at the house someone who had recent contact with John O’Keefe someone who later admits to phone deletion and replacement That makes him a priority interview, not a casual witness. Higgins was another badge from another agency, already inside the building, overlapping socially with other key figures. Delaying his interview insulated him from spontaneous questioning, recorded inconsistencies, and early device preservation. This isn’t about what Higgins eventually said. It’s about what wasn’t captured, what changed before it was captured,what evidence window closed Once days pass, phones get replaced, messages disappear,stories converge That bell cannot be unrung. Yuri Bukhenik testified that He arrived at Canton Police Department around 9:15 AM Michael Proctor was already there, They were at CPD before going to Jen McCabe’s house At 9:00–9:20 Michael Lank is back at Brian Albert’s house because Jen McCabe “forgot to tell him something” and called him back 9:40 Brian Albert calls Kevin Albert 9:50 Brian Albert Missed incoming call from Chief Berkowitz 9:54 Brian Albert calls Chief Berkowitz (4m 40s) So while Lank has just been at Brian Albert’s house Higgins has just arrived at CPD Yuri and Proctor claim to be staging the next steps …the Chief of Police is directly communicating with Brian Albert, a homeowner and witness.

If Brian Higgins was physically at Canton PD at 9:26 AM on January 29, why wasn’t he interviewed by State Police then and why did they wait days? Brian Higgins arrives at Canton Police Department at 9:26 AM Yuri Bukhenik testifies he arrives around 9:15 AM Michael Proctor is already there Higgins is a law-enforcement officer a known attendee at the house someone who had recent contact with John O’Keefe someone who later admits to phone deletion and replacement That makes him a priority interview, not a casual witness. Higgins was another badge from another agency, already inside the building, overlapping socially with other key figures. Delaying his interview insulated him from spontaneous questioning, recorded inconsistencies, and early device preservation. This isn’t about what Higgins eventually said. It’s about what wasn’t captured, what changed before it was captured,what evidence window closed Once days pass, phones get replaced, messages disappear,stories converge That bell cannot be unrung. Yuri Bukhenik testified that He arrived at Canton Police Department around 9:15 AM Michael Proctor was already there, They were at CPD before going to Jen McCabe’s house At 9:00–9:20 Michael Lank is back at Brian Albert’s house because Jen McCabe “forgot to tell him something” and called him back 9:40 Brian Albert calls Kevin Albert 9:50 Brian Albert Missed incoming call from Chief Berkowitz 9:54 Brian Albert calls Chief Berkowitz (4m 40s) So while Lank has just been at Brian Albert’s house Higgins has just arrived at CPD Yuri and Proctor claim to be staging the next steps …the Chief of Police is directly communicating with Brian Albert, a homeowner and witness.

Dixie Normus

24,189 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), the only former FBI agent serving in the House, says he's "very concerned" about political pressure at the FBI, as the top agent at the New York office says he was forced out of his job over clashes with the Justice Department. "The FBI needs to be completely nonpartisan, completely apolitical." He says he will "absolutely" talk to the new FBI director, Kash Patel, about his concerns, and suggests that potential agents should be tested for political bias as part of the hiring process.

Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), the only former FBI agent serving in the House, says he's "very concerned" about political pressure at the FBI, as the top agent at the New York office says he was forced out of his job over clashes with the Justice Department. "The FBI needs to be completely nonpartisan, completely apolitical." He says he will "absolutely" talk to the new FBI director, Kash Patel, about his concerns, and suggests that potential agents should be tested for political bias as part of the hiring process.

Face The Nation

137,101 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

“The poll said Michael D Higgins was never going to be president. He won the election. He won twice. He did a very good job. Tomorrow, we're going to defy all the skeptics, and we're going to elect Heather Humphreys the 10th president of Ireland”, Simon Harris says in Donegal

“The poll said Michael D Higgins was never going to be president. He won the election. He won twice. He did a very good job. Tomorrow, we're going to defy all the skeptics, and we're going to elect Heather Humphreys the 10th president of Ireland”, Simon Harris says in Donegal

Louise Burne

316,150 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Brian Higgins arrives at 34 Fairview just before Brian Albert and Coco. Remember the plow srory! Brian Albert and Coco enter the house through two different entry points, yet both independently say they saw and spoke with Colin Albert inside. Higgins, however, says He never saw Colin Albert He “wouldn’t even know what Colin Albert looks like if he walked into the courtroom” Sooooo....Two people enter separately and both see Colin. A third person there for roughly an hour sees everyone except Colin. Higgins says he Stayed about one hour, Left through the breezeway doorand Drove directly to the Canton Police Department. CPD surveillance shows Higgins arriving at 1:26 a.m. Dashcam footage establishes 34 Fairview → CPD = 4 minute drive…..If Higgins left around 1:20–1:22 a.m., the timeline works. He does not leave CPD until 1:46 a.m. Higgins testified he got home at 1:40 a.m. He said once home, he Ate, Had a couple of drinks Went to bed CPD surveillance shows Higgins did not leave the station until 1:46 a.m. He cannot be home at 1:40 if he is still inside CPD at 1:46. From CPD to West Roxbury Minimum 15 minutes under normal conditions Longer in a blizzard, which this was sooo Earliest realistic arrival home 2:05–2:10 a.m., not 1:40 a.m. At 2:22 a.m. Brian Albert calls Brian Higgins, 17 seconds later Higgins calls Albert back Both men claim these were “butt dials” The 2:22 a.m. calls line up far more realistically with, Higgins just arriving home, or Higgins still awake and active...Not Already home for 40+ minutes Finished eating Drinking and In bed sleeping The next morning He returned to 34 Fairview around 7:00 a.m. He claims he saw only one police vehicle present. He says he stayed less than an hour. Well At 7:00 a.m., the following vehicles should have been present….Gallagher Lank Saraf Mullaney Goody’s vehicle would also be there or had already left (he went to retrieve the leaf blower). Seeing only one police vehicle at 7:00 a.m. does not match the known scene activity. According to Higgins Inside the house was Brian Albert Sr. Coco Brian Albert Jr. Jen McCabe Matt McCabe and Julie arrives later around 8:00–8:30 a.m. with donuts. Brian Albert Jr. states he never saw Higgins that morning. Higgins says he saw jr.... Multiple adults present and NO CPD saw higgins I think the issue here is jen hadn't started the timeline Yet, for everybody

Brian Higgins arrives at 34 Fairview just before Brian Albert and Coco. Remember the plow srory! Brian Albert and Coco enter the house through two different entry points, yet both independently say they saw and spoke with Colin Albert inside. Higgins, however, says He never saw Colin Albert He “wouldn’t even know what Colin Albert looks like if he walked into the courtroom” Sooooo....Two people enter separately and both see Colin. A third person there for roughly an hour sees everyone except Colin. Higgins says he Stayed about one hour, Left through the breezeway doorand Drove directly to the Canton Police Department. CPD surveillance shows Higgins arriving at 1:26 a.m. Dashcam footage establishes 34 Fairview → CPD = 4 minute drive…..If Higgins left around 1:20–1:22 a.m., the timeline works. He does not leave CPD until 1:46 a.m. Higgins testified he got home at 1:40 a.m. He said once home, he Ate, Had a couple of drinks Went to bed CPD surveillance shows Higgins did not leave the station until 1:46 a.m. He cannot be home at 1:40 if he is still inside CPD at 1:46. From CPD to West Roxbury Minimum 15 minutes under normal conditions Longer in a blizzard, which this was sooo Earliest realistic arrival home 2:05–2:10 a.m., not 1:40 a.m. At 2:22 a.m. Brian Albert calls Brian Higgins, 17 seconds later Higgins calls Albert back Both men claim these were “butt dials” The 2:22 a.m. calls line up far more realistically with, Higgins just arriving home, or Higgins still awake and active...Not Already home for 40+ minutes Finished eating Drinking and In bed sleeping The next morning He returned to 34 Fairview around 7:00 a.m. He claims he saw only one police vehicle present. He says he stayed less than an hour. Well At 7:00 a.m., the following vehicles should have been present….Gallagher Lank Saraf Mullaney Goody’s vehicle would also be there or had already left (he went to retrieve the leaf blower). Seeing only one police vehicle at 7:00 a.m. does not match the known scene activity. According to Higgins Inside the house was Brian Albert Sr. Coco Brian Albert Jr. Jen McCabe Matt McCabe and Julie arrives later around 8:00–8:30 a.m. with donuts. Brian Albert Jr. states he never saw Higgins that morning. Higgins says he saw jr.... Multiple adults present and NO CPD saw higgins I think the issue here is jen hadn't started the timeline Yet, for everybody

Dixie Normus

30,755 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

MICHAEL MOVIE 🍿 First off , Michael Jackson should not be dead 🙄 it makes me so mad every time I think about it . In my opinion , I feel like all the lawsuits & people not wanting to be involved , ruined what could’ve been one of the best Michael movies because the ACTORS ate down & all of the music performances gave me chills , but the story was moving so FAST and so much was cut out , that we couldn’t even get into depth of what really happened but overall i STILL enjoyed it and recommend it if you are a fan of Michael . After the nose surgery , Jafaar Jackson looked just like Michael , it was scary how identical it was. All of the performances reenacted were flawless . Colman Domingo ate as Joe Jackson & he had me mad talking about Michael “big nose” but he had the same mf nose . As important as he was to the Jackson 5’s success, he also was responsible for their insecurities and trauma 🙄 Juliano was really good as young Michael too. It was very believable . How yall feel about the movie ? LETS TALK IN THE COMMENTS 🎤 #michaelmovie #isaiahjaay #michaeljackson #jafaarjackson

MICHAEL MOVIE 🍿 First off , Michael Jackson should not be dead 🙄 it makes me so mad every time I think about it . In my opinion , I feel like all the lawsuits & people not wanting to be involved , ruined what could’ve been one of the best Michael movies because the ACTORS ate down & all of the music performances gave me chills , but the story was moving so FAST and so much was cut out , that we couldn’t even get into depth of what really happened but overall i STILL enjoyed it and recommend it if you are a fan of Michael . After the nose surgery , Jafaar Jackson looked just like Michael , it was scary how identical it was. All of the performances reenacted were flawless . Colman Domingo ate as Joe Jackson & he had me mad talking about Michael “big nose” but he had the same mf nose . As important as he was to the Jackson 5’s success, he also was responsible for their insecurities and trauma 🙄 Juliano was really good as young Michael too. It was very believable . How yall feel about the movie ? LETS TALK IN THE COMMENTS 🎤 #michaelmovie #isaiahjaay #michaeljackson #jafaarjackson

3/12 🎈

34,164 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

3 witnesses, Matt McCabe, Jen McCabe, and Brian Higgins ALL testified to the exact location of Higgins Jeep on January 29, 2022. Very specific testimony the Jeep was directly in from of the mailbox at 34 Fairview Rd. That’s a problem for Dr. Welcher’s theory of Karen Read’s Lexus LX570 driving backwards 53 Ft during key cycle and still moving 24 mph. #KarenReadTrial

3 witnesses, Matt McCabe, Jen McCabe, and Brian Higgins ALL testified to the exact location of Higgins Jeep on January 29, 2022. Very specific testimony the Jeep was directly in from of the mailbox at 34 Fairview Rd. That’s a problem for Dr. Welcher’s theory of Karen Read’s Lexus LX570 driving backwards 53 Ft during key cycle and still moving 24 mph. #KarenReadTrial

Leah Baker

88,223 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

💥Flashback to when a citizen confronted Paul Gallagher in the CPD parking lot, the day after he abruptly retired, following his disgraceful testimony in the Karen Read trial was broadcast on live tv. 💥When the citizen says he’s gonna “catch him” Gallagher’s hand SHAKES uncontrollably.

💥Flashback to when a citizen confronted Paul Gallagher in the CPD parking lot, the day after he abruptly retired, following his disgraceful testimony in the Karen Read trial was broadcast on live tv. 💥When the citizen says he’s gonna “catch him” Gallagher’s hand SHAKES uncontrollably.

JoeyBagaD🍩nuts

37,128 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce