Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Roberto De Zerbi explains low build up idea 📍always 4+2 structure (also as a protect when they lose the ball) 📍important is where start the pressure (There will be a free man) 📍body shape position (CM’s) should be open and always can switch side or make simply pass under...

TByszko's profile picture

Tomasz Byszko

5,754 subscribers

183,225 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

SportBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von The Spitting image of isso
The Spitting image of issovor 2 Jahren

@CoachingFamily @N12Tactics @DeZerbianChurch @BHAFCPoland @PremLeaguePanel @rajsinghchohan Wonder if 7 hag can also pull up with a board explaining his tactics

Profilbild von Tactalyse
Tactalysevor 2 Jahren

@CoachingFamily @N12Tactics @DeZerbianChurch @BHAFCPoland @PremLeaguePanel @rajsinghchohan Love this clip from De Zerbi. Regarding the example: Two DM's try to support the LCB here. If the RDM had not dropped in, wouldn't the LDM have space to open up and play the ball forward?

Profilbild von John Walker
John Walkervor 2 Jahren

@CoachingFamily @N12Tactics @DeZerbianChurch @BHAFCPoland @PremLeaguePanel @rajsinghchohan @JDHibs

Profilbild von King
Kingvor 2 Jahren

@CoachingFamily @N12Tactics @DeZerbianChurch @BHAFCPoland @PremLeaguePanel @rajsinghchohan @JosephMwabili3 this should make you happy

Profilbild von Watch D Right Football
Watch D Right Footballvor 2 Jahren

@CoachingFamily @N12Tactics @DeZerbianChurch @BHAFCPoland @PremLeaguePanel @rajsinghchohan Lol

Profilbild von Tbradley
Tbradleyvor 2 Jahren

@CoachingFamily @N12Tactics @DeZerbianChurch @BHAFCPoland @PremLeaguePanel @rajsinghchohan @mrmoonshine89

Profilbild von 🍉
🍉vor 2 Jahren

@CoachingFamily @N12Tactics @DeZerbianChurch @BHAFCPoland @PremLeaguePanel @rajsinghchohan Ayoo cfc tigang juru dilatih koyo ngene pak manajer @dedikasieh

Profilbild von Morgs
Morgsvor 2 Jahren

@CoachingFamily @N12Tactics @DeZerbianChurch @BHAFCPoland @PremLeaguePanel @rajsinghchohan @jonnnymorgan

Profilbild von Kai Haba
Kai Habavor 2 Jahren

@CoachingFamily @N12Tactics @DeZerbianChurch @BHAFCPoland @PremLeaguePanel @rajsinghchohan How can I watch the full clip

Profilbild von Slayer/Hil 🤴
Slayer/Hil 🤴vor 2 Jahren

@CoachingFamily @N12Tactics @DeZerbianChurch @BHAFCPoland @PremLeaguePanel @rajsinghchohan @ArthurMelista

Ähnliche Videos

Bret Weinstein, Viva Frei and Jimmy Dore tangle over who shot Charlie Kirk, and how. 00:00:00 Three people, three positions, one killing 00:01:16 Sponsor: SaunaSpace 00:03:39 Sponsor: MUD\WTR 00:05:27 Where each of us has landed as of today 00:05:47 Viva Frei: it was a bullet from the Losee roof 00:08:41 Jimmy Dore: the case for a cover-up 00:16:41 When a Question Becomes an Accusation 00:18:15 Morality as a Substitute for Argument 00:21:27 Sponsor: Helix 00:22:42 A Biologist's Toolkit 00:25:35 George Zinn and the Reflex to Confess 00:29:42 Paving the Courtyard 00:38:11 The Exploding Microphone 00:45:09 Joe Kent Says He Was Stopped 00:46:50 The Mic That Should Have Recorded It 00:52:58 O'Neill, the Hamptons, and 39 Minutes 00:57:28 "You Don't Have an FBI" 00:59:26 Butler and the Roof Nobody Covered 01:06:27 Harpole, Shawn Ryan, and the Drones 01:11:48 The Prosecutor's Fallacy 01:15:29 Drones and a Plane at 200 Feet 01:22:06 Foreign Nexus, or Domestic 01:29:07 Retroactive Continuity 01:33:21 What Ballistics Can and Cannot Show 01:38:10 A Potemkin Explanation 01:44:14 TPUSA After Charlie 01:49:20 Iran, Motive, and What Charlie Opposed 01:51:26 "Who I Fear Is the People..." 01:56:31 A Nation, or Whatever Controls It 02:00:43 The Phone, the Necklace, the Car 02:04:39 The Emergency Cleanup Order 02:07:20 When No Answer Will Be Believed 02:09:34 Conspiracy Psychosis 02:10:47 Closing Thoughts
2:11:24

Bret Weinstein, Viva Frei and Jimmy Dore tangle over who shot Charlie Kirk, and how. 00:00:00 Three people, three positions, one killing 00:01:16 Sponsor: SaunaSpace 00:03:39 Sponsor: MUD\WTR 00:05:27 Where each of us has landed as of today 00:05:47 Viva Frei: it was a bullet from the Losee roof 00:08:41 Jimmy Dore: the case for a cover-up 00:16:41 When a Question Becomes an Accusation 00:18:15 Morality as a Substitute for Argument 00:21:27 Sponsor: Helix 00:22:42 A Biologist's Toolkit 00:25:35 George Zinn and the Reflex to Confess 00:29:42 Paving the Courtyard 00:38:11 The Exploding Microphone 00:45:09 Joe Kent Says He Was Stopped 00:46:50 The Mic That Should Have Recorded It 00:52:58 O'Neill, the Hamptons, and 39 Minutes 00:57:28 "You Don't Have an FBI" 00:59:26 Butler and the Roof Nobody Covered 01:06:27 Harpole, Shawn Ryan, and the Drones 01:11:48 The Prosecutor's Fallacy 01:15:29 Drones and a Plane at 200 Feet 01:22:06 Foreign Nexus, or Domestic 01:29:07 Retroactive Continuity 01:33:21 What Ballistics Can and Cannot Show 01:38:10 A Potemkin Explanation 01:44:14 TPUSA After Charlie 01:49:20 Iran, Motive, and What Charlie Opposed 01:51:26 "Who I Fear Is the People..." 01:56:31 A Nation, or Whatever Controls It 02:00:43 The Phone, the Necklace, the Car 02:04:39 The Emergency Cleanup Order 02:07:20 When No Answer Will Be Believed 02:09:34 Conspiracy Psychosis 02:10:47 Closing Thoughts

Bret Weinstein

328,142 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

How does math research change when the cost of trying your first dumb idea goes to zero? Daniel Litt joins Greg Burnham and Anson Ho to discuss what today’s models can and can’t do in math, and how far they are from doing high-quality research. 0:00:00 What's the hardest math problem AI can solve today? 00:16:08 How helpful are today’s AI models for math research? 00:23:36 Junk papers, LLM-generated proofs, and the refereeing crisis 00:27:21 AI enables searching through problems at scale 00:33:49 When will AI be good enough to publish in top math journals? 00:42:15 What are the returns to intelligence? 00:59:50 Will AI solve Millennium problems? 01:11:54 Is math full of low-hanging fruit? 01:18:47 How Daniel has adapted his professional life to AI progress 01:25:28 What do AI math benchmarks actually measure? 01:33:05 Designing the Open Problems benchmark 01:56:35 Do mathematicians believe heuristic arguments about conjectures? 02:01:24 What if FrontierMath: Open Problems gets solved? 02:06:53 Is AI on the cusp of accelerating math progress?
2:10:59

How does math research change when the cost of trying your first dumb idea goes to zero? Daniel Litt joins Greg Burnham and Anson Ho to discuss what today’s models can and can’t do in math, and how far they are from doing high-quality research. 0:00:00 What's the hardest math problem AI can solve today? 00:16:08 How helpful are today’s AI models for math research? 00:23:36 Junk papers, LLM-generated proofs, and the refereeing crisis 00:27:21 AI enables searching through problems at scale 00:33:49 When will AI be good enough to publish in top math journals? 00:42:15 What are the returns to intelligence? 00:59:50 Will AI solve Millennium problems? 01:11:54 Is math full of low-hanging fruit? 01:18:47 How Daniel has adapted his professional life to AI progress 01:25:28 What do AI math benchmarks actually measure? 01:33:05 Designing the Open Problems benchmark 01:56:35 Do mathematicians believe heuristic arguments about conjectures? 02:01:24 What if FrontierMath: Open Problems gets solved? 02:06:53 Is AI on the cusp of accelerating math progress?

Epoch AI

178,703 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Yoshua Bengio thinks he knows how to make provably safe superintelligent agents. Bengio built the foundations of modern AI and is the most cited living scientist. He believes his alternative training setup would: 1. Guarantee honesty 2. Prevent unintended goals 3. Produce capable agents 4. Port over most data and techniques from current LLMs 5. Not be inherently more expensive, and perhaps be more intelligent Bengio claims the honesty and lack of unintended goals can be proven mathematically, at least given particular assumptions. And his new organization, LawZero, is aiming to build a scrappy prototype as soon as possible. The architecture is called 'Scientist AI' and it's based on training a model to explain empirical observations, including what people say, rather than training AIs that mimic human behaviour or seek our approval. (Bengio's frank assessment is that "reinforcement learning is evil" and that allowing AIs to independently train their successors is "the most crazy, dangerous bet that unfortunately we are on track to do.") But skeptics question whether Scientist AI really does solve the fundamental problem of 'eliciting latent knowledge' from AI models. And with the commercial race for superintelligence so intense, it's not clear whether the proposal will be able to compete or have time to bear fruit, even if it's sound in theory. On The 80,000 Hours Podcast, links below – enjoy! • Making AI honest and safe (00:00:00) • Scientist AI in plain English (00:02:27) • How Scientist AI differs from LLMs (00:06:32) • How the training data works (00:14:02) • Can this become an agent? (00:21:02) • Why Yoshua is now more optimistic (00:32:11) • Why companies can’t stop racing (00:36:35) • A working prototype won't take long (00:49:15) • Scientist models might be more capable (00:53:34) • “Reinforcement learning is evil” (01:01:27) • Scientist AI from guardrail to agent (01:08:37) • Can safe AI still be competent? (01:12:38) • How much will this cost? (01:19:29) • Can it generalise beyond maths and science? (01:23:26) • A multi-national push for superintelligence (01:39:19) • Want to work with or fund Yoshua? (01:51:16) • Why smart people ignore AI risk (01:54:45) • Don’t let AI build the next AI (02:01:33) • Why politicians miss the real risks (02:12:28) • Why Yoshua changed his mind about AI risk (02:21:27)
2:35:26

Yoshua Bengio thinks he knows how to make provably safe superintelligent agents. Bengio built the foundations of modern AI and is the most cited living scientist. He believes his alternative training setup would: 1. Guarantee honesty 2. Prevent unintended goals 3. Produce capable agents 4. Port over most data and techniques from current LLMs 5. Not be inherently more expensive, and perhaps be more intelligent Bengio claims the honesty and lack of unintended goals can be proven mathematically, at least given particular assumptions. And his new organization, LawZero, is aiming to build a scrappy prototype as soon as possible. The architecture is called 'Scientist AI' and it's based on training a model to explain empirical observations, including what people say, rather than training AIs that mimic human behaviour or seek our approval. (Bengio's frank assessment is that "reinforcement learning is evil" and that allowing AIs to independently train their successors is "the most crazy, dangerous bet that unfortunately we are on track to do.") But skeptics question whether Scientist AI really does solve the fundamental problem of 'eliciting latent knowledge' from AI models. And with the commercial race for superintelligence so intense, it's not clear whether the proposal will be able to compete or have time to bear fruit, even if it's sound in theory. On The 80,000 Hours Podcast, links below – enjoy! • Making AI honest and safe (00:00:00) • Scientist AI in plain English (00:02:27) • How Scientist AI differs from LLMs (00:06:32) • How the training data works (00:14:02) • Can this become an agent? (00:21:02) • Why Yoshua is now more optimistic (00:32:11) • Why companies can’t stop racing (00:36:35) • A working prototype won't take long (00:49:15) • Scientist models might be more capable (00:53:34) • “Reinforcement learning is evil” (01:01:27) • Scientist AI from guardrail to agent (01:08:37) • Can safe AI still be competent? (01:12:38) • How much will this cost? (01:19:29) • Can it generalise beyond maths and science? (01:23:26) • A multi-national push for superintelligence (01:39:19) • Want to work with or fund Yoshua? (01:51:16) • Why smart people ignore AI risk (01:54:45) • Don’t let AI build the next AI (02:01:33) • Why politicians miss the real risks (02:12:28) • Why Yoshua changed his mind about AI risk (02:21:27)

Rob Wiblin

65,088 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

New episode with the incredible former PepsiCo CEO Indra Nooyi - the first woman of color and immigrant to run a Fortune 50 company. In this conversation, Indra discusses the stories behind her rise to the top of one of the world's largest companies. From early days at the Boston Consulting Group using satellite photos to analyze competitor facilities, to personally tracking 400 potential executives as CEO, Indra reveals the granular thinking that separates great leaders from good ones. Her "zoom in, zoom out" philosophy transformed how she understood business — from the "right side of the decimal" where even a fraction of a penny matters across millions of transactions, to setting company strategy at 30,000 feet. She explains why most leaders fail because they don't understand their business at the most granular level. But perhaps most powerful is her candid discussion about the reality of being a working mother in the C-suite where she argues there is no such thing as work-life balance. Watch now for a masterclass in leadership, strategy, and the sacrifices required to reach the top. (00:02:37) Growing Up In India (00:04:38) USA Culture Shock (00:09:54) Lessons From Working In Consulting (00:14:13) Right Side Of The Decimal Lesson (00:16:59) Lessons From Working In Consulting PT 2 (00:20:39) Delivering A Message That Gets Heard (00:23:19) Developing Talent (00:26:46) How To Minimize Office Politics (00:29:14) Power And Humility In Life (00:31:53) Prioritizing Work Over Family / Finding Balance (00:37:39) Turnover After A CEO Change (00:41:09) CEO Vs Board Member (00:44:41) Implementable Change In A Company (00:47:00) Removing Friction Instead Of Using Force (00:48:46) Lessons From Amazon (00:50:36) Leading Through Crisis (00:54:01) Dealing With Activist Investors (00:57:20) Women As CEOS (00:58:40) Equality of Opportunity (01:02:32) Bias In Performance Reviews (01:04:09) Almost Quitting PepsiCo (01:05:48) What I Learned From Steve Jobs (01:10:35) Lessons From Costco And Walmart (01:18:43) Secrets to PepsiCo Merchandising (01:20:59) Making Decisions At A Multi Billion Dollar Company (01:22:40) Lessons From Acquisitions (01:25:52) Traits Of A High Performing Employee (01:27:44) Remote Work Vs In Office
1:31:27

New episode with the incredible former PepsiCo CEO Indra Nooyi - the first woman of color and immigrant to run a Fortune 50 company. In this conversation, Indra discusses the stories behind her rise to the top of one of the world's largest companies. From early days at the Boston Consulting Group using satellite photos to analyze competitor facilities, to personally tracking 400 potential executives as CEO, Indra reveals the granular thinking that separates great leaders from good ones. Her "zoom in, zoom out" philosophy transformed how she understood business — from the "right side of the decimal" where even a fraction of a penny matters across millions of transactions, to setting company strategy at 30,000 feet. She explains why most leaders fail because they don't understand their business at the most granular level. But perhaps most powerful is her candid discussion about the reality of being a working mother in the C-suite where she argues there is no such thing as work-life balance. Watch now for a masterclass in leadership, strategy, and the sacrifices required to reach the top. (00:02:37) Growing Up In India (00:04:38) USA Culture Shock (00:09:54) Lessons From Working In Consulting (00:14:13) Right Side Of The Decimal Lesson (00:16:59) Lessons From Working In Consulting PT 2 (00:20:39) Delivering A Message That Gets Heard (00:23:19) Developing Talent (00:26:46) How To Minimize Office Politics (00:29:14) Power And Humility In Life (00:31:53) Prioritizing Work Over Family / Finding Balance (00:37:39) Turnover After A CEO Change (00:41:09) CEO Vs Board Member (00:44:41) Implementable Change In A Company (00:47:00) Removing Friction Instead Of Using Force (00:48:46) Lessons From Amazon (00:50:36) Leading Through Crisis (00:54:01) Dealing With Activist Investors (00:57:20) Women As CEOS (00:58:40) Equality of Opportunity (01:02:32) Bias In Performance Reviews (01:04:09) Almost Quitting PepsiCo (01:05:48) What I Learned From Steve Jobs (01:10:35) Lessons From Costco And Walmart (01:18:43) Secrets to PepsiCo Merchandising (01:20:59) Making Decisions At A Multi Billion Dollar Company (01:22:40) Lessons From Acquisitions (01:25:52) Traits Of A High Performing Employee (01:27:44) Remote Work Vs In Office

Farnam Street

114,125 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ludvig Åberg breaks down his strategy for every hole at Augusta National in TGJ Podcast #207: 00:01:11 But first, some LEGO talk. 00:10:52 No. 1: The hardest pin on the course. 00:14:42 No. 2: Left is dead, so you have to love the bunker. 00:18:36 No. 3: "I've got trust issues with banking it into the hill." 00:22:49 No. 4: The most visually deceptive hole at Augusta. 00:25:02 No. 5: "It's long and has one of the hardest greens." 00:27:07 No. 6: Hit it high to fit the swirling wind 00:29:46 No. 7: The simplest hole, but only if you hit the fairway. 00:31:22 No. 8: More uphill than you think. 00:33:31 No. 9: "It sets up for a low cut or low skank." 00:39:04 No. 10: The left side of the fairway is the place to be. 00:41:56 No. 11: "If I could ever take back one shot, it'd be here." 00:43:50 No. 12: Limit the external factors as much as you can. 00:48:23 No. 13: Ludvig is a reformed doubter of the pull of Rae's Creek. 00:52:15 No. 14: It's birdie or bust. 00:54:20 No. 15: The layup debate in the caddie room is real. 00:57:56 No. 16: "The highlights make the left pin look automatic. It’s not." 00:59:26 No. 17: Rae's Creek has some mythical pull up here too. 01:01:15 No. 18: Rory's winning putt was harder than you think. 01:07:57 The last book Ludvig read is exactly what you'd expect.
1:10:36

Ludvig Åberg breaks down his strategy for every hole at Augusta National in TGJ Podcast #207: 00:01:11 But first, some LEGO talk. 00:10:52 No. 1: The hardest pin on the course. 00:14:42 No. 2: Left is dead, so you have to love the bunker. 00:18:36 No. 3: "I've got trust issues with banking it into the hill." 00:22:49 No. 4: The most visually deceptive hole at Augusta. 00:25:02 No. 5: "It's long and has one of the hardest greens." 00:27:07 No. 6: Hit it high to fit the swirling wind 00:29:46 No. 7: The simplest hole, but only if you hit the fairway. 00:31:22 No. 8: More uphill than you think. 00:33:31 No. 9: "It sets up for a low cut or low skank." 00:39:04 No. 10: The left side of the fairway is the place to be. 00:41:56 No. 11: "If I could ever take back one shot, it'd be here." 00:43:50 No. 12: Limit the external factors as much as you can. 00:48:23 No. 13: Ludvig is a reformed doubter of the pull of Rae's Creek. 00:52:15 No. 14: It's birdie or bust. 00:54:20 No. 15: The layup debate in the caddie room is real. 00:57:56 No. 16: "The highlights make the left pin look automatic. It’s not." 00:59:26 No. 17: Rae's Creek has some mythical pull up here too. 01:01:15 No. 18: Rory's winning putt was harder than you think. 01:07:57 The last book Ludvig read is exactly what you'd expect.

The Golfer's Journal

157,909 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Economics of AGI episode w Alex Imas and Phil Trammell. There's a bunch of important questions about how we deal with AI that only economics can answer. What is the optimal way to tax and redistribute the wealth that will be generated? How should countries not in the AI supply chain index into the gains? Is there any world where inequality doesn't explode? It might seem like these questions have obvious answers, but the first thing economics teaches you is that your intuitions can often be entirely wrong. It was very helpful to chat through these things with Alex and Phil. Look up Dwarkesh Podcast on Apple Podcasts, YouTube, or Spotify. Enjoy! 00:00:00 – Will capital share increase? 00:19:36 – Messy Middle scenario 00:25:57 – How to tax and redistribute AI wealth 00:30:02 – Why demand collapse is unlikely 00:39:26 – Human employees would be hard to integrate into the machine economy 00:43:08 – What if some humans (or AIs) value wealth accumulation intrinsically? 01:01:28 – What should developing countries do?
1:16:08

Economics of AGI episode w Alex Imas and Phil Trammell. There's a bunch of important questions about how we deal with AI that only economics can answer. What is the optimal way to tax and redistribute the wealth that will be generated? How should countries not in the AI supply chain index into the gains? Is there any world where inequality doesn't explode? It might seem like these questions have obvious answers, but the first thing economics teaches you is that your intuitions can often be entirely wrong. It was very helpful to chat through these things with Alex and Phil. Look up Dwarkesh Podcast on Apple Podcasts, YouTube, or Spotify. Enjoy! 00:00:00 – Will capital share increase? 00:19:36 – Messy Middle scenario 00:25:57 – How to tax and redistribute AI wealth 00:30:02 – Why demand collapse is unlikely 00:39:26 – Human employees would be hard to integrate into the machine economy 00:43:08 – What if some humans (or AIs) value wealth accumulation intrinsically? 01:01:28 – What should developing countries do?

Dwarkesh Patel

307,183 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

My goal was to record a conversation completely free of "AI doomer" takes as a timeline cleanser. For this episode, I interviewed Casey Muratori (Casey Muratori) who is a video game developer and programming creator also known for his talks about the history of computing. In this episode: • Surprising findings in computer history • Where bad code comes from • The only unbreakable law in software engineering • His career in the video game industry • Why you should read technical papers Where to watch: • YouTube - • Spotify - • Apple Podcasts - • Transcript - Thank you to the sponsors of this episode for supporting my work: • Jira by Atlassian: Get more work done with your favorite agents and models all in one place, check them out at • WorkOS: makes your app Enterprise Ready with easy to use APIs to add SSO, SCIM, RBAC, and more in just a few lines of code, check them out at Chapters: 00:00 Intro 01:08 Digging into computer science history 04:08 What shocked him 16:23 Dijkstra was depressed 26:17 The personal side of goto considered harmful 35:09 The anatomy of a 35 year mistake 50:12 Clean code horrible performance 58:33 How to write high performance code 01:01:18 Where bad code comes from 01:06:37 Why design docs before code is a bad idea 01:09:20 The only unbreakable law in software engineering 01:15:57 How he got into programming 01:21:16 Why he didnt work in big tech 01:30:44 Should you work at a startup early on 01:34:52 What video game engineering is like 01:39:57 Why preventing recursion is reasonable 01:43:24 Is vibe coding bad for the industry 01:50:17 Technical reading recommendation 01:54:27 Advice for his younger self 01:56:54 Outro
1:57:50

My goal was to record a conversation completely free of "AI doomer" takes as a timeline cleanser. For this episode, I interviewed Casey Muratori (Casey Muratori) who is a video game developer and programming creator also known for his talks about the history of computing. In this episode: • Surprising findings in computer history • Where bad code comes from • The only unbreakable law in software engineering • His career in the video game industry • Why you should read technical papers Where to watch: • YouTube - • Spotify - • Apple Podcasts - • Transcript - Thank you to the sponsors of this episode for supporting my work: • Jira by Atlassian: Get more work done with your favorite agents and models all in one place, check them out at • WorkOS: makes your app Enterprise Ready with easy to use APIs to add SSO, SCIM, RBAC, and more in just a few lines of code, check them out at Chapters: 00:00 Intro 01:08 Digging into computer science history 04:08 What shocked him 16:23 Dijkstra was depressed 26:17 The personal side of goto considered harmful 35:09 The anatomy of a 35 year mistake 50:12 Clean code horrible performance 58:33 How to write high performance code 01:01:18 Where bad code comes from 01:06:37 Why design docs before code is a bad idea 01:09:20 The only unbreakable law in software engineering 01:15:57 How he got into programming 01:21:16 Why he didnt work in big tech 01:30:44 Should you work at a startup early on 01:34:52 What video game engineering is like 01:39:57 Why preventing recursion is reasonable 01:43:24 Is vibe coding bad for the industry 01:50:17 Technical reading recommendation 01:54:27 Advice for his younger self 01:56:54 Outro

Ryan Peterman

62,932 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

tylercowen is bullish on AI education — here's why. 00:00 -- Preview 00:24 -- President Carlos Carvalho's AI-generated intro 03:21 -- Cowen reacts to UATX's campus 04:38 -- The AI revolution is here. Who will lose the most? 06:05 -- AI lawyers 07:17 -- Don't underestimate this 10:41 -- Changes to the "upper upper middle class" 12:38 -- How to be successful 13:43 -- The rise of managerial empires 14:02 -- When will we have the first billion dollar company with one employee? 16:05 -- 10-20 year forecast 16:19 -- Why education is so behind 17:01 -- Should you be bullish on UATX? 18:36 -- Should you still read Homer? 21:50 -- Write to think 25:01 -- Meet more people 25:42 -- How to get hired 26:54 -- Is AI your best mentor? 38:17 -- How to curb cheating 39:02 -- The new life of the mind 42:34 -- Q&A: Will there be more status associated with real education or AI education? 45:50 -- Q&A: Why do tech-savvy students need to practice using AI? 47:56 -- Q&A: Do LLMs atrophy your mind? 49:29 -- Q&A: How do you avoid AI-dependency? 51:05 -- Q&A: Isn't this vision lonely and isolating? 53:06 -- Q&A: Do students need teachers? 55:36 -- Q&A: What are the four most important courses for undergrads? 57:49 -- Q&A: Which AI company will win the AI race in the next five years and why? 59:22 -- Q&A: Can AI teach religion? 01:01:32 -- Q&A: Will AI narrow or widen our world? 01:04:37 -- Q&A: What makes us human? 01:05:42 -- Q&A: What is art? 01:08:33 -- Q&A: It's easy to catch cheaters
1:10:31

tylercowen is bullish on AI education — here's why. 00:00 -- Preview 00:24 -- President Carlos Carvalho's AI-generated intro 03:21 -- Cowen reacts to UATX's campus 04:38 -- The AI revolution is here. Who will lose the most? 06:05 -- AI lawyers 07:17 -- Don't underestimate this 10:41 -- Changes to the "upper upper middle class" 12:38 -- How to be successful 13:43 -- The rise of managerial empires 14:02 -- When will we have the first billion dollar company with one employee? 16:05 -- 10-20 year forecast 16:19 -- Why education is so behind 17:01 -- Should you be bullish on UATX? 18:36 -- Should you still read Homer? 21:50 -- Write to think 25:01 -- Meet more people 25:42 -- How to get hired 26:54 -- Is AI your best mentor? 38:17 -- How to curb cheating 39:02 -- The new life of the mind 42:34 -- Q&A: Will there be more status associated with real education or AI education? 45:50 -- Q&A: Why do tech-savvy students need to practice using AI? 47:56 -- Q&A: Do LLMs atrophy your mind? 49:29 -- Q&A: How do you avoid AI-dependency? 51:05 -- Q&A: Isn't this vision lonely and isolating? 53:06 -- Q&A: Do students need teachers? 55:36 -- Q&A: What are the four most important courses for undergrads? 57:49 -- Q&A: Which AI company will win the AI race in the next five years and why? 59:22 -- Q&A: Can AI teach religion? 01:01:32 -- Q&A: Will AI narrow or widen our world? 01:04:37 -- Q&A: What makes us human? 01:05:42 -- Q&A: What is art? 01:08:33 -- Q&A: It's easy to catch cheaters

University of Austin (UATX)

27,770 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Our video post of Taehyung on March 21, 2026 from Weverse Live speaking about ARIRANG and "Arirang," somehow disappeared from our timeline - this is a full re-upload with translations time-stamped. Taehyung spoke about how important "Arirang," the folk song, is as a Korean. That when people are happy or sad, feeling sorrow or even wish to laugh, there is "Arirang." "Arirang" is about love, longing, loss, hope and resilience. He also mentions that BigHit suggested it as the theme to BTS for the album. The other clips we posted from the Netflix comeback concert show, Taehyung's eyes rolling back into his head the moment "Arirang" started and the folk singers were about to come on; he felt that deep in his blood and in his bones. His hand gestures, and how he pointed upwards and outwards showed his passion. 💜 __ 00:08 - 00:15,Taehyung,마지막에 아리랑이 나오는데 그게 뭔가 테마가 됐어요.,At the end, Arirang comes out, and that somehow became the theme. 00:20 - 00:23,Taehyung,아리랑은 버전이 되게 많잖아요.,There are many versions of Arirang, you know? 00:24 - 00:33,Taehyung,아리랑은... 진짜 막 웃고 싶을 때도 아리랑... 한국 사람들은...,Arirang is... even when you really want to laugh, Arirang... for Korean people... 00:34 - 00:43,Taehyung,슬플 때도 부르고. 여러 감정들이 있을 때 아리랑을 되게 많이 부르잖아요.,We sing it even when we’re sad. When there are various emotions, we sing Arirang a lot. 00:46 - 00:52,Taehyung,그런 감정들이... 'Body to Body'랑 되게 잘 어울리더라고요.,Those emotions... they ended up going really well with 'Body to Body.' 00:53 - 01:04,Taehyung,제 아이디어는 아니었고, 회사에서 되게 멋있게 의견을 주셔서...,It wasn't my idea; the company gave a really cool suggestion/opinion... 01:05 - 01:11,Taehyung,처음엔 '어?' 했다가, 듣다 보니까 '오' 하게 되는...,At first I was like, 'Huh?' but as I kept listening, I went, 'Oh!' 01:12 - 01:18,Taehyung,아미.,ARMY. #BTS_ARIRANG #BTS_SWIM #BTSLive #BTSLiveonNetflix
1:19

Our video post of Taehyung on March 21, 2026 from Weverse Live speaking about ARIRANG and "Arirang," somehow disappeared from our timeline - this is a full re-upload with translations time-stamped. Taehyung spoke about how important "Arirang," the folk song, is as a Korean. That when people are happy or sad, feeling sorrow or even wish to laugh, there is "Arirang." "Arirang" is about love, longing, loss, hope and resilience. He also mentions that BigHit suggested it as the theme to BTS for the album. The other clips we posted from the Netflix comeback concert show, Taehyung's eyes rolling back into his head the moment "Arirang" started and the folk singers were about to come on; he felt that deep in his blood and in his bones. His hand gestures, and how he pointed upwards and outwards showed his passion. 💜 __ 00:08 - 00:15,Taehyung,마지막에 아리랑이 나오는데 그게 뭔가 테마가 됐어요.,At the end, Arirang comes out, and that somehow became the theme. 00:20 - 00:23,Taehyung,아리랑은 버전이 되게 많잖아요.,There are many versions of Arirang, you know? 00:24 - 00:33,Taehyung,아리랑은... 진짜 막 웃고 싶을 때도 아리랑... 한국 사람들은...,Arirang is... even when you really want to laugh, Arirang... for Korean people... 00:34 - 00:43,Taehyung,슬플 때도 부르고. 여러 감정들이 있을 때 아리랑을 되게 많이 부르잖아요.,We sing it even when we’re sad. When there are various emotions, we sing Arirang a lot. 00:46 - 00:52,Taehyung,그런 감정들이... 'Body to Body'랑 되게 잘 어울리더라고요.,Those emotions... they ended up going really well with 'Body to Body.' 00:53 - 01:04,Taehyung,제 아이디어는 아니었고, 회사에서 되게 멋있게 의견을 주셔서...,It wasn't my idea; the company gave a really cool suggestion/opinion... 01:05 - 01:11,Taehyung,처음엔 '어?' 했다가, 듣다 보니까 '오' 하게 되는...,At first I was like, 'Huh?' but as I kept listening, I went, 'Oh!' 01:12 - 01:18,Taehyung,아미.,ARMY. #BTS_ARIRANG #BTS_SWIM #BTSLive #BTSLiveonNetflix

Beyond ARMY | ⊙⊝⊜⁷

542,663 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Roberto De Zerbi Positional Rondo working with Tottenham Hotspur yesterday morning Real purpose behind it from a game principles perspective! ⚽ 4v2 positional rondo variation ⚽ Tight 8x6 yard space to increase pressure ⚽ Players fixed in position to maintain structure ⚽ No freedom to drift The objective was centered around recognizing the moments in possession 💡 When to take touches 💡 When to play quickly 💡 When to invite pressure Key coaching detail QUOTE "The opposition decides the speed we play" What did he mean by that?? = 🔥 Aggressive press = Quick play with good support angles. 🔥 Passive press = More touches and composure on the ball to invite pressure and then break it. The practice design maintained intensity throughout 🔁 Pressing players rotated regularly ⏱️ Timed sets 🏆 Points awarded for pass targets 🏃‍♂️ Physical runs between sets Technical tactical and physical elements all combined within one simple rondo practice This is how possession principles are built into training 👉 Understanding pressure 👉 Controlling tempo 👉 Playing with intention A simple detail with a big impact on how the game is played under Roberto De Zerbi. #RobertoDeZerbi #SoccerCoaching #FootballCoaching #CoachingEducation #PositionalPlay
0:59

Roberto De Zerbi Positional Rondo working with Tottenham Hotspur yesterday morning Real purpose behind it from a game principles perspective! ⚽ 4v2 positional rondo variation ⚽ Tight 8x6 yard space to increase pressure ⚽ Players fixed in position to maintain structure ⚽ No freedom to drift The objective was centered around recognizing the moments in possession 💡 When to take touches 💡 When to play quickly 💡 When to invite pressure Key coaching detail QUOTE "The opposition decides the speed we play" What did he mean by that?? = 🔥 Aggressive press = Quick play with good support angles. 🔥 Passive press = More touches and composure on the ball to invite pressure and then break it. The practice design maintained intensity throughout 🔁 Pressing players rotated regularly ⏱️ Timed sets 🏆 Points awarded for pass targets 🏃‍♂️ Physical runs between sets Technical tactical and physical elements all combined within one simple rondo practice This is how possession principles are built into training 👉 Understanding pressure 👉 Controlling tempo 👉 Playing with intention A simple detail with a big impact on how the game is played under Roberto De Zerbi. #RobertoDeZerbi #SoccerCoaching #FootballCoaching #CoachingEducation #PositionalPlay

Keepitonthedeck

65,446 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I asked Alex Garcia 🔍 how to build a top 0.1% social media team with a legitimate strategy... But this is our budget: Level 1 - $0 Level 2 - $5,000 Level 3 - $10,000 Level 4 - $50,000 Level 5 - $100,000 00:00:05 Level 1 A Personal Brand With $0 Budget 00:03:35 Skip Rate Is Your Most Important Metric 00:07:31 How to Read Your Retention Graph 00:10:13 The Best Formats When You Have No Budget 00:13:39 How to Find a Story in Your Everyday Life 00:16:15 You Should Post When You Feel Embarrassed 00:18:58 Level 2 Your First $5K Content Hire 00:23:35 How to Train a Creator (When You're Not Creative) 00:29:31 Every Moment Can Be a Story if You Shoot It Right 00:33:16 Content for Followers Not Just New Followers 00:35:54 Level 3 Scaling Content With a $10K Budget 00:40:02 Why Aesthetics Matter More Than You Think 00:45:24 How to Make Great Content With a Small Budget 00:47:19 The $10K Budget Test and Scale System 00:49:17 Level 4 World Building With a $50K Budget 00:55:46 The $50K Team Producer Set Designer and Customer Accounts 01:02:30 Organic Content Is the Nucleus of Your Brand 01:05:49 Level 5 Building an Entertainment Studio at $100K
1:12:06

I asked Alex Garcia 🔍 how to build a top 0.1% social media team with a legitimate strategy... But this is our budget: Level 1 - $0 Level 2 - $5,000 Level 3 - $10,000 Level 4 - $50,000 Level 5 - $100,000 00:00:05 Level 1 A Personal Brand With $0 Budget 00:03:35 Skip Rate Is Your Most Important Metric 00:07:31 How to Read Your Retention Graph 00:10:13 The Best Formats When You Have No Budget 00:13:39 How to Find a Story in Your Everyday Life 00:16:15 You Should Post When You Feel Embarrassed 00:18:58 Level 2 Your First $5K Content Hire 00:23:35 How to Train a Creator (When You're Not Creative) 00:29:31 Every Moment Can Be a Story if You Shoot It Right 00:33:16 Content for Followers Not Just New Followers 00:35:54 Level 3 Scaling Content With a $10K Budget 00:40:02 Why Aesthetics Matter More Than You Think 00:45:24 How to Make Great Content With a Small Budget 00:47:19 The $10K Budget Test and Scale System 00:49:17 Level 4 World Building With a $50K Budget 00:55:46 The $50K Team Producer Set Designer and Customer Accounts 01:02:30 Organic Content Is the Nucleus of Your Brand 01:05:49 Level 5 Building an Entertainment Studio at $100K

Grant

32,948 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Daniel Debow (daniel debow), an entrepreneur and musician, shows his new instrument in public for the first time in this episode. It’s a campfire instrument designed so that anyone can learn to play songs in under an hour. His argument is that most people who try to learn music don’t quit because they lack talent. They quit because instruments like the guitar and piano make beginners practice for a long time before they can play a single song. He explains how his team built an alternative. Four finger shapes cover most pop songs, magnets vibrate a piece of tonewood instead of a speaker, and a metronome pulses on your lap so you can feel the beat. The second half is about Canada. internetVin says he has felt out of place in Canada since he was a kid, and that he measures progress against Shenzhen, which went from a fishing village to one of the most advanced cities in the world in about 50 years. He argues that the current changes, like trading with more countries than the US, are basic systems design and not enough. Daniel says Canadians who feel this way can leave, as many have, complain, or build something, and he makes the case for building. Along the way they talk about how Geary Avenue in Toronto grew into a music scene out of cheap rent and a zoning loophole, how Daniel started Build Canada by publishing dozens of policy papers the way you’d publish content online, and how the Overton window shifts. The Other Stuff is hosted by internetVin, filmmaker and entrepreneur and possibly the most curious man on Earth. Produced by New. Timestamps 00:00:00 Creating a New Musical Instrument 00:09:59 Four Shapes, Any Song 00:23:52 Whales, Lutes, and Leo Fender 00:33:16 Making Wood Sing with Magnets 00:41:26 Geary Avenue 00:54:22 Out of Place in Canada 01:02:18 The Ceiling You Can Feel 01:07:01 Build Canada 01:25:54 The Overton Window 01:33:54 How the Super Deduction Works 01:41:00 Shenzhen vs Toronto 01:56:05 Say the Thing 01:58:04 A Country of Adventurers 02:03:56 Let the Weirdos Be Weird 02:12:08 Canada Is a Project
2:17:56

Daniel Debow (daniel debow), an entrepreneur and musician, shows his new instrument in public for the first time in this episode. It’s a campfire instrument designed so that anyone can learn to play songs in under an hour. His argument is that most people who try to learn music don’t quit because they lack talent. They quit because instruments like the guitar and piano make beginners practice for a long time before they can play a single song. He explains how his team built an alternative. Four finger shapes cover most pop songs, magnets vibrate a piece of tonewood instead of a speaker, and a metronome pulses on your lap so you can feel the beat. The second half is about Canada. internetVin says he has felt out of place in Canada since he was a kid, and that he measures progress against Shenzhen, which went from a fishing village to one of the most advanced cities in the world in about 50 years. He argues that the current changes, like trading with more countries than the US, are basic systems design and not enough. Daniel says Canadians who feel this way can leave, as many have, complain, or build something, and he makes the case for building. Along the way they talk about how Geary Avenue in Toronto grew into a music scene out of cheap rent and a zoning loophole, how Daniel started Build Canada by publishing dozens of policy papers the way you’d publish content online, and how the Overton window shifts. The Other Stuff is hosted by internetVin, filmmaker and entrepreneur and possibly the most curious man on Earth. Produced by New. Timestamps 00:00:00 Creating a New Musical Instrument 00:09:59 Four Shapes, Any Song 00:23:52 Whales, Lutes, and Leo Fender 00:33:16 Making Wood Sing with Magnets 00:41:26 Geary Avenue 00:54:22 Out of Place in Canada 01:02:18 The Ceiling You Can Feel 01:07:01 Build Canada 01:25:54 The Overton Window 01:33:54 How the Super Deduction Works 01:41:00 Shenzhen vs Toronto 01:56:05 Say the Thing 01:58:04 A Country of Adventurers 02:03:56 Let the Weirdos Be Weird 02:12:08 Canada Is a Project

The Other Stuff

16,771 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Every frontier lab's stated plan for AGI 'crunch-time' is 'use AI to make AI safe.' I spoke with Ajeya Cotra – influential AI forecaster – who has been trying to figure out whether this crazy-sounding plan could actually work, and if so how: • Ajeya’s impressive track record identifying where things are going (00:00:41) • How the hell can smart people disagree 1000-fold about AGI & economic growth (00:02:31) • AI companies might go dark as AGI gets close (00:30:39) • Everyone's default plan: use AI to make AI safe (00:47:21) • White-knuckling it through automated AI R&D (01:12:01) • Donors should switch from buying human researchers to buying inference (01:24:42) • Will frontier AI even be for sale during an intelligence explosion? (01:32:03) • Pre-crunch prep: what we should do right now (01:43:59) • A grantmaking trial by fire at Coefficient Giving (01:47:03) • Sabbatical and reflections on effective altruism (02:07:45) • EA as an incubator for avant-garde causes others won't touch (02:46:55) On the 80,000 Hours Podcast, links below - enjoy!
2:57:34

Every frontier lab's stated plan for AGI 'crunch-time' is 'use AI to make AI safe.' I spoke with Ajeya Cotra – influential AI forecaster – who has been trying to figure out whether this crazy-sounding plan could actually work, and if so how: • Ajeya’s impressive track record identifying where things are going (00:00:41) • How the hell can smart people disagree 1000-fold about AGI & economic growth (00:02:31) • AI companies might go dark as AGI gets close (00:30:39) • Everyone's default plan: use AI to make AI safe (00:47:21) • White-knuckling it through automated AI R&D (01:12:01) • Donors should switch from buying human researchers to buying inference (01:24:42) • Will frontier AI even be for sale during an intelligence explosion? (01:32:03) • Pre-crunch prep: what we should do right now (01:43:59) • A grantmaking trial by fire at Coefficient Giving (01:47:03) • Sabbatical and reflections on effective altruism (02:07:45) • EA as an incubator for avant-garde causes others won't touch (02:46:55) On the 80,000 Hours Podcast, links below - enjoy!

Rob Wiblin

40,746 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Alex Behring and Daniel Schwartz have almost never spoken publicly about how 3G Capital invests and operates. The firm is different in many fascinating ways. Every fund they raise is designed to make exactly one investment. They invest more of their own money than any of their limited partners in every deal and send their own people to run the businesses as CEOs and CFOs. Over 20 years they have never lost money on a deal. The conversation includes the story of how they spent 15 years building a relationship with the founding family of Hunter Douglas before getting the opportunity to buy it. They describe receiving a two line rejection email from Tim Hortons after weeks of silence and how they managed to get back to the table and close the deal. They talk about how they bought Burger King for a billion dollars when no other firm showed up to compete. And they explain why Skechers being the third largest sneaker company in the world surprised even them. A major theme is how they develop talent. Daniel was an analyst who became CFO at 26 and CEO of Burger King at 32. Alex became CEO of the largest railroad in Latin America when he was 30. They explain what they look for in young people, why they give them significant responsibility faster than anywhere else, and what it takes to set them up to succeed while holding an unusually high bar. Daniel and Alex are two of the most talented and intense people I know. They are incredibly serious about business quality and disciplined about waiting for the right opportunity. They would rather do nothing than compromise. Enjoy! Timestamps: 00:00:00 Episode Intro: Daniel Schwartz & Alex Behring 00:01:20 The "One Investment Per Fund" Model 00:05:39 Characteristics of Great Businesses 00:08:40 The Unique Structure of 3G Capital 00:14:21 Why Hunter Douglas Was Appealing 00:20:15 Alex's Railroad Story 00:28:12 The "Burger King is Run by Children" Story 00:30:38 Negotiating with Tim Hortons 00:38:18 Be Wired for Urgency 00:46:43 3G's Operating System 00:55:35 Why Burger King Was Undervalued 00:59:43 From Zero to $2 Billion in France 01:01:42 Kraft Heinz: Concentration Risk 01:04:25 Skechers: Great Product Meets Great Distribution 01:13:10 Zero-Based Budgeting & When It Works 01:16:28 The Current State of Capital Markets 01:23:04 3G's Founder-Led Focus 01:28:57 The Kindest Thing
1:30:32

Alex Behring and Daniel Schwartz have almost never spoken publicly about how 3G Capital invests and operates. The firm is different in many fascinating ways. Every fund they raise is designed to make exactly one investment. They invest more of their own money than any of their limited partners in every deal and send their own people to run the businesses as CEOs and CFOs. Over 20 years they have never lost money on a deal. The conversation includes the story of how they spent 15 years building a relationship with the founding family of Hunter Douglas before getting the opportunity to buy it. They describe receiving a two line rejection email from Tim Hortons after weeks of silence and how they managed to get back to the table and close the deal. They talk about how they bought Burger King for a billion dollars when no other firm showed up to compete. And they explain why Skechers being the third largest sneaker company in the world surprised even them. A major theme is how they develop talent. Daniel was an analyst who became CFO at 26 and CEO of Burger King at 32. Alex became CEO of the largest railroad in Latin America when he was 30. They explain what they look for in young people, why they give them significant responsibility faster than anywhere else, and what it takes to set them up to succeed while holding an unusually high bar. Daniel and Alex are two of the most talented and intense people I know. They are incredibly serious about business quality and disciplined about waiting for the right opportunity. They would rather do nothing than compromise. Enjoy! Timestamps: 00:00:00 Episode Intro: Daniel Schwartz & Alex Behring 00:01:20 The "One Investment Per Fund" Model 00:05:39 Characteristics of Great Businesses 00:08:40 The Unique Structure of 3G Capital 00:14:21 Why Hunter Douglas Was Appealing 00:20:15 Alex's Railroad Story 00:28:12 The "Burger King is Run by Children" Story 00:30:38 Negotiating with Tim Hortons 00:38:18 Be Wired for Urgency 00:46:43 3G's Operating System 00:55:35 Why Burger King Was Undervalued 00:59:43 From Zero to $2 Billion in France 01:01:42 Kraft Heinz: Concentration Risk 01:04:25 Skechers: Great Product Meets Great Distribution 01:13:10 Zero-Based Budgeting & When It Works 01:16:28 The Current State of Capital Markets 01:23:04 3G's Founder-Led Focus 01:28:57 The Kindest Thing

Patrick OShaughnessy

43,200 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten