正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨🇩🇪“RUSSIAN ELECTION INTERFERENCE” — BUT THE CHANNEL HAD JUST 351 SUBSCRIBERS? German MEP Petr Bystron raises serious questions about the narrative used to describe alleged Russian interference ahead of the European Parliament elections. He describes a Prague-based news operation that authorities alleged was being used as a vehicle for... Russian influence across Europe. So Bystron says they looked at its actual reach. According to him, its English-language YouTube channel had just: 351 SUBSCRIBERS. And videos receiving, he says, an average of only: 4 OR 5 LIKES. Yet Europeans were being warned that an operation of this kind represented an attempt to manipulate elections across the European Union. Then Bystron makes the much bigger allegation. He says that during the political campaign surrounding these accusations, the conservative grouping he is discussing ultimately lost 27 seats. That does not by itself prove the campaign caused those losses. But it raises a question worth examining: WHO WAS ACTUALLY INFLUENCING THE ELECTION? A tiny media operation allegedly pushing Russian propaganda? Or the enormous political and media response generated around the allegation itself? If governments are going to invoke “foreign interference” during an election campaign, the evidential threshold should be exceptionally high. Because accusations of election interference can themselves influence voters. And once that happens, the institutions claiming to protect democracy risk becoming participants in the political process. 351 SUBSCRIBERS. 4–5 LIKES PER VIDEO. AN ALLEGED THREAT TO ELECTIONS ACROSS EUROPE. Petr Bystron asks whether the real manipulation was somewhere else entirely. WATCH AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF. Petr Bystronshow more

Jim Ferguson

445,774 subscribers

12,022 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨🇩🇪“THIS ELECTION INTERFERENCE IS GOING TO BLOW UP.” German MEP Peter Bystron issues an extraordinary warning from inside the European Parliament. ROMANIA. SLOVAKIA. THE NETHERLANDS. FRANCE. GERMANY. Allegations of political interference are now reaching across Europe. And this is no longer a question that can simply be dismissed as politicians complaining about election results. A US congressional investigation has raised serious questions about European censorship, political speech and interference surrounding democratic processes. So I went directly into the European Parliament to investigate. The question at the heart of this investigation is simple: ARE EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONS PROTECTING DEMOCRACY — OR INCREASINGLY SHAPING THE POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH EUROPEANS ARE ALLOWED TO CHOOSE THEIR GOVERNMENTS? These are serious allegations. They require serious evidence. And that is exactly what I went looking for. Watch what Peter Bystron told me inside the European Parliament. This investigation goes much deeper. Petr Bystron

🚨🇩🇪“THIS ELECTION INTERFERENCE IS GOING TO BLOW UP.” German MEP Peter Bystron issues an extraordinary warning from inside the European Parliament. ROMANIA. SLOVAKIA. THE NETHERLANDS. FRANCE. GERMANY. Allegations of political interference are now reaching across Europe. And this is no longer a question that can simply be dismissed as politicians complaining about election results. A US congressional investigation has raised serious questions about European censorship, political speech and interference surrounding democratic processes. So I went directly into the European Parliament to investigate. The question at the heart of this investigation is simple: ARE EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONS PROTECTING DEMOCRACY — OR INCREASINGLY SHAPING THE POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH EUROPEANS ARE ALLOWED TO CHOOSE THEIR GOVERNMENTS? These are serious allegations. They require serious evidence. And that is exactly what I went looking for. Watch what Peter Bystron told me inside the European Parliament. This investigation goes much deeper. Petr Bystron

Jim Ferguson

57,637 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨🇩🇪“THEY ARE INFLUENCING ELECTIONS” — GERMAN MEP PETR BYSTRON This should concern anyone who believes elections belong to the people. German MEP Petr Bystron points to one of the most controversial statements made by former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton following the annulment of Romania's presidential election. Speaking about enforcement of European rules, Breton said words translated as: “We did it in Romania, and we will obviously do it if necessary in Germany.” Bystron's interpretation is explosive. He argues that what Europe calls protecting democracy is increasingly becoming interference in the democratic process itself. Breton disputes that interpretation and has maintained that he was talking about enforcing EU law against online interference — not claiming Brussels could simply overturn elections. But that makes the question even more important: WHAT EXACTLY DID “WE DID IT IN ROMANIA” MEAN? Romania's presidential election was annulled. Germany's AfD has faced extraordinary political and institutional pressure. And Bystron says these developments have now caught the attention of lawmakers in the United States. Democracy cannot mean: “You may vote for anyone you like — provided the establishment approves of the result.” If European institutions are acting solely to protect elections from unlawful interference, show the evidence. Show the legal basis. Show exactly what interventions took place. Because protecting democracy and managing its outcomes are two very different things. THE PEOPLE MUST DECIDE WHO GOVERNS THEM. NOT BRUSSELS. Petr Bystron

🚨🇩🇪“THEY ARE INFLUENCING ELECTIONS” — GERMAN MEP PETR BYSTRON This should concern anyone who believes elections belong to the people. German MEP Petr Bystron points to one of the most controversial statements made by former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton following the annulment of Romania's presidential election. Speaking about enforcement of European rules, Breton said words translated as: “We did it in Romania, and we will obviously do it if necessary in Germany.” Bystron's interpretation is explosive. He argues that what Europe calls protecting democracy is increasingly becoming interference in the democratic process itself. Breton disputes that interpretation and has maintained that he was talking about enforcing EU law against online interference — not claiming Brussels could simply overturn elections. But that makes the question even more important: WHAT EXACTLY DID “WE DID IT IN ROMANIA” MEAN? Romania's presidential election was annulled. Germany's AfD has faced extraordinary political and institutional pressure. And Bystron says these developments have now caught the attention of lawmakers in the United States. Democracy cannot mean: “You may vote for anyone you like — provided the establishment approves of the result.” If European institutions are acting solely to protect elections from unlawful interference, show the evidence. Show the legal basis. Show exactly what interventions took place. Because protecting democracy and managing its outcomes are two very different things. THE PEOPLE MUST DECIDE WHO GOVERNS THEM. NOT BRUSSELS. Petr Bystron

Jim Ferguson

20,654 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇩🇪 EXCLUSIVE: PETR BYSTRON SAYS EU ELECTIONS WERE “MANIPULATED” — CALLS U.S. REPORT A BOMBSHELL I sat down with Petr Bystron, foreign policy spokesman for Alternative für Deutschland and Member of the European Parliament, and he did not hold back. According to Bystron, the recent U.S. Senate Judiciary findings are a “bombshell” — alleging that the European Commission interfered in multiple European elections while censoring dissent across the bloc. His claim? That what many Europeans “felt” for years is now being formally documented: • Suppression of opposition voices • Pressure on social media platforms • Narrative control during COVID • Election influence in Romania and beyond Bystron went further — arguing that if interference is proven, then the legitimacy of the current European Parliament itself comes into question. He also alleged a double standard in Germany: Left-wing extremist violence ignored. Opposition voices prosecuted. Satirical memes punished with jail time. The political temperature in Europe is rising — fast. Bystron says his party supports dismantling the Commission structure in its current form and restoring authority to directly elected national lawmakers. And when I asked how close AfD is to power in Germany? His answer was simple: “Soon. Things will change.” The transatlantic pressure is building. The sovereignty debate is intensifying. And Brussels is firmly in the spotlight. This isn’t a minor policy dispute. It’s a legitimacy fight. Petr Bystron AfD

🇩🇪 EXCLUSIVE: PETR BYSTRON SAYS EU ELECTIONS WERE “MANIPULATED” — CALLS U.S. REPORT A BOMBSHELL I sat down with Petr Bystron, foreign policy spokesman for Alternative für Deutschland and Member of the European Parliament, and he did not hold back. According to Bystron, the recent U.S. Senate Judiciary findings are a “bombshell” — alleging that the European Commission interfered in multiple European elections while censoring dissent across the bloc. His claim? That what many Europeans “felt” for years is now being formally documented: • Suppression of opposition voices • Pressure on social media platforms • Narrative control during COVID • Election influence in Romania and beyond Bystron went further — arguing that if interference is proven, then the legitimacy of the current European Parliament itself comes into question. He also alleged a double standard in Germany: Left-wing extremist violence ignored. Opposition voices prosecuted. Satirical memes punished with jail time. The political temperature in Europe is rising — fast. Bystron says his party supports dismantling the Commission structure in its current form and restoring authority to directly elected national lawmakers. And when I asked how close AfD is to power in Germany? His answer was simple: “Soon. Things will change.” The transatlantic pressure is building. The sovereignty debate is intensifying. And Brussels is firmly in the spotlight. This isn’t a minor policy dispute. It’s a legitimacy fight. Petr Bystron AfD

Jim Ferguson

92,046 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨🇪🇺 ALEX NEWMAN: “MASSIVE ELECTION INTERFERENCE FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION” A US congressional investigation has raised serious questions about European censorship and interference surrounding elections across Europe. Romania. Moldova. Germany. France. I saw the controversy surrounding Romania's elections firsthand while reporting there and interviewing George Simion. Alex Newman followed it closely too. His assessment is explosive: “There was massive election interference from the European Union.” And then he asks the question at the heart of this: What happens when institutions claim they are “defending democracy” — but decide the electorate cannot be trusted to make the “right” choice? Watch. Alex Newman

🚨🇪🇺 ALEX NEWMAN: “MASSIVE ELECTION INTERFERENCE FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION” A US congressional investigation has raised serious questions about European censorship and interference surrounding elections across Europe. Romania. Moldova. Germany. France. I saw the controversy surrounding Romania's elections firsthand while reporting there and interviewing George Simion. Alex Newman followed it closely too. His assessment is explosive: “There was massive election interference from the European Union.” And then he asks the question at the heart of this: What happens when institutions claim they are “defending democracy” — but decide the electorate cannot be trusted to make the “right” choice? Watch. Alex Newman

Jim Ferguson

36,291 次观看 • 1 个月前

Catherine Herridge says a whistleblower was sounding the alarm about China’s influence operations in the summer of 2020 — but “suddenly it all was suppressed” instead of being elevated. HERRIDGE: “So in the summer of 2020, as we’re heading into the election, in the intelligence community, there were indicators of this Chinese influence operation.” “Influence operations means that you’re trying to affect the outcome of how people vote or their sentiment about a presidential candidate.” “It’s different than an interference operation, which is penetrating voting rolls and voter systems.” “And this whistleblower was raising the alarm about the influence operation and then suddenly it all was suppressed.” “My understanding is that some of their reports, there were in officials on hand writing that they wanted everything out could help President Trump in his re-election.” “So there clear evidence of political and personal bias, and intelligence is supposed to be neutral.” “So what we heard tonight from the president is an allegation that this intelligence was suppressed in order harm him. And now we’re seeing documents already which back those claims.”

Catherine Herridge says a whistleblower was sounding the alarm about China’s influence operations in the summer of 2020 — but “suddenly it all was suppressed” instead of being elevated. HERRIDGE: “So in the summer of 2020, as we’re heading into the election, in the intelligence community, there were indicators of this Chinese influence operation.” “Influence operations means that you’re trying to affect the outcome of how people vote or their sentiment about a presidential candidate.” “It’s different than an interference operation, which is penetrating voting rolls and voter systems.” “And this whistleblower was raising the alarm about the influence operation and then suddenly it all was suppressed.” “My understanding is that some of their reports, there were in officials on hand writing that they wanted everything out could help President Trump in his re-election.” “So there clear evidence of political and personal bias, and intelligence is supposed to be neutral.” “So what we heard tonight from the president is an allegation that this intelligence was suppressed in order harm him. And now we’re seeing documents already which back those claims.”

Overton

124,657 次观看 • 2 个月前

December 16, 2016. Obama does an hour long interview with NPR. The entire interview is stunning for a few reasons. 1. Almost everything Obama says is in direct contradiction to the intelligence report on the election that he had just recently received. The majority of this interview was spent discussing Russia's election interference to help Trump. We now know that Obama had just received a report informing him that did not happen. 2. It was extremely obvious throughout the entire interview that Obama was lying and that he knew the significance of what he was doing. 3. Obama finished the interview, left and returned to talk about a new "Intelligence Assessment" that would be dropping before Trump's inauguration. He was priming the media to be on the look out for the bogus report he had just asked for. It's impossible to overstate the magnitude of what Obama was doing during this interview. And of course he turned to NPR to help him do his dirty work.

December 16, 2016. Obama does an hour long interview with NPR. The entire interview is stunning for a few reasons. 1. Almost everything Obama says is in direct contradiction to the intelligence report on the election that he had just recently received. The majority of this interview was spent discussing Russia's election interference to help Trump. We now know that Obama had just received a report informing him that did not happen. 2. It was extremely obvious throughout the entire interview that Obama was lying and that he knew the significance of what he was doing. 3. Obama finished the interview, left and returned to talk about a new "Intelligence Assessment" that would be dropping before Trump's inauguration. He was priming the media to be on the look out for the bogus report he had just asked for. It's impossible to overstate the magnitude of what Obama was doing during this interview. And of course he turned to NPR to help him do his dirty work.

MAZE

1,101,031 次观看 • 1 年前

🇷🇴“THE EVIDENCE DOESN’T EXIST” — EXPLOSIVE CLAIM OVER ROMANIA’S CANCELLED ELECTION This goes directly to the heart of one of the most extraordinary democratic controversies in modern Europe. In my interview with Laura Gherasim, we return to the annulment of Romania's 2024 presidential election. And Laura makes an extraordinary allegation. She argues that the justification necessary to cancel the election was never established — and says: “WE WILL NEVER HAVE THE EVIDENCE, SIMPLY BECAUSE IT DOESN’T EXIST.” Think about the gravity of that statement. An election was annulled. Millions of votes were effectively discarded. A presidential candidate was subsequently prevented from standing in the rerun. Yet the fundamental question remains: WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT JUSTIFIED OVERTURNING THE RESULT? Laura argues that allegations of electoral interference must be proved, not simply asserted. That principle should transcend Romanian politics. If democratic institutions possess compelling evidence justifying the cancellation of an election, the public deserves to see the case laid out transparently. If they cannot produce it, then Europe has a much bigger problem. Because democracy cannot mean voters are sovereign only when institutions approve of their decision. THIS IS WHY I WENT TO ROMANIA TO INVESTIGATE. Watch this exchange carefully. The implications extend far beyond Romania. IF AN ELECTION CAN BE CANCELLED WITHOUT THE PUBLIC EVER SEEING CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE, WHAT DOES “DEMOCRACY” ACTUALLY MEAN? Laura Gherasim 🇷🇴 George Simion 🇲🇩

🇷🇴“THE EVIDENCE DOESN’T EXIST” — EXPLOSIVE CLAIM OVER ROMANIA’S CANCELLED ELECTION This goes directly to the heart of one of the most extraordinary democratic controversies in modern Europe. In my interview with Laura Gherasim, we return to the annulment of Romania's 2024 presidential election. And Laura makes an extraordinary allegation. She argues that the justification necessary to cancel the election was never established — and says: “WE WILL NEVER HAVE THE EVIDENCE, SIMPLY BECAUSE IT DOESN’T EXIST.” Think about the gravity of that statement. An election was annulled. Millions of votes were effectively discarded. A presidential candidate was subsequently prevented from standing in the rerun. Yet the fundamental question remains: WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT JUSTIFIED OVERTURNING THE RESULT? Laura argues that allegations of electoral interference must be proved, not simply asserted. That principle should transcend Romanian politics. If democratic institutions possess compelling evidence justifying the cancellation of an election, the public deserves to see the case laid out transparently. If they cannot produce it, then Europe has a much bigger problem. Because democracy cannot mean voters are sovereign only when institutions approve of their decision. THIS IS WHY I WENT TO ROMANIA TO INVESTIGATE. Watch this exchange carefully. The implications extend far beyond Romania. IF AN ELECTION CAN BE CANCELLED WITHOUT THE PUBLIC EVER SEEING CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE, WHAT DOES “DEMOCRACY” ACTUALLY MEAN? Laura Gherasim 🇷🇴 George Simion 🇲🇩

Jim Ferguson

16,739 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 OSUN DECIDES: LET THE PEOPLE CHOOSE Before I get into the new Mohbad findings, I need to say this: Bola Ahmed Tinubu do you understand the kind of political structure and tension that can be created when institutions and political actors are perceived as trying to influence an election? Why are APC governors and senators being sent to Osun to “observe” the election? Nigerians deserve to know their exact role and whether their presence could influence the process in any way. Considering the controversies and alleged irregularities reported before now, there are already serious concerns about what the outcome could look like. And let me be clear: this is not me campaigning for Adeleke. I also believe that if a government has performed exceptionally well, its record should speak for itself without excessive campaigning. 🤷 But regardless of political party, LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE. Osun voters deserve a free, fair, peaceful and credible election without intimidation, manipulation or undue political influence. TODAY IS THE DAY. Let the people's votes count. 🗳️ #OsunDecides #OsunElection

🚨 OSUN DECIDES: LET THE PEOPLE CHOOSE Before I get into the new Mohbad findings, I need to say this: Bola Ahmed Tinubu do you understand the kind of political structure and tension that can be created when institutions and political actors are perceived as trying to influence an election? Why are APC governors and senators being sent to Osun to “observe” the election? Nigerians deserve to know their exact role and whether their presence could influence the process in any way. Considering the controversies and alleged irregularities reported before now, there are already serious concerns about what the outcome could look like. And let me be clear: this is not me campaigning for Adeleke. I also believe that if a government has performed exceptionally well, its record should speak for itself without excessive campaigning. 🤷 But regardless of political party, LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE. Osun voters deserve a free, fair, peaceful and credible election without intimidation, manipulation or undue political influence. TODAY IS THE DAY. Let the people's votes count. 🗳️ #OsunDecides #OsunElection

Verydarkman

79,285 次观看 • 1 个月前

With the Russia hoax being exposed more every single day, there is another hoax making its rounds again. Hoax: In 2018 Putin said that he directed his people to help Trump win the election. A short, out of context clip is now their "proof" of Russian election interference to help Trump in 2016. Brennan talked about it. Peter Baker posted about it a couple days ago. Bill Maher played it on his show last night, claiming it was proof of Russian interference to help Trump. It's all over MSNBC and CNN again. They probably all know the truth about the clip but it doesn't stop them from lying about it. Firstly, it should come as no surprise that CNN's clip is different from almost all of the others broadcasted, as you will shortly see. Top clip is the hoax: Putin is asked if he wanted Trump to win and then asked if he directed his officials to help him. Putin answers "yes I did." Here's what actually happened. Putin had just stated that he in no way directed anyone to interfere in the election, that there was no collusion, and that it was all ridiculous nonsense. Putin called the accusations garbage more than once in the press conference. Putin was then asked by a reporter why people should believe his denials about election interference and if he would hand over the 12 people Mueller indicted (show indictments btw). Putin took out his translator ear piece and gave a long answer about working with Trump to find out if crimes were committed, America and Russia working together on other stuff, treaties, etc. During that answer (bottom clip) he again said the accusations of interference were not true. At the end of his answer, the same reporter who asked him the previous questions asked "Did you want Trump to win and did you instruct officials to help him." By watching any other broadcast than CNN, it becomes very clear what happened. Putin did not hear the first half of the reporter's followup question because he was putting on an ear piece and the volume of the reporter's mic was down. Watch the top clip and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip. Look at the difference. You will see it is obvious that Putin did not hear the first question and only heard the second question about if he instructed people to help Trump. It's obvious that he thought it applied to what he was just talking about, which was America and Russia working together. It's so funny how in the foreign broadcasts and some of the American ones, it's clear that Putin didn't hear the first half of the question. But on CNN the volume is magically up and it appears that Putin heard both questions. But the fact is that Putin had just spent most of the press conference denying any interference in the election or collusion with Trump. He wasn't all of a sudden admitting it now. He didn't hear the first question. The hoaxers never play any of the rest of the press conference with all the denials. In another press conference after this one Putin again says it was all a hoax cooked up to undermine Trump's presidency. If the MSM cared at all about America or the truth they would lay out what I just did. If you don't want to watch all the context, just watch the top clip, the beginning of the bottom clip, and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip and you will see clearly what happened.

With the Russia hoax being exposed more every single day, there is another hoax making its rounds again. Hoax: In 2018 Putin said that he directed his people to help Trump win the election. A short, out of context clip is now their "proof" of Russian election interference to help Trump in 2016. Brennan talked about it. Peter Baker posted about it a couple days ago. Bill Maher played it on his show last night, claiming it was proof of Russian interference to help Trump. It's all over MSNBC and CNN again. They probably all know the truth about the clip but it doesn't stop them from lying about it. Firstly, it should come as no surprise that CNN's clip is different from almost all of the others broadcasted, as you will shortly see. Top clip is the hoax: Putin is asked if he wanted Trump to win and then asked if he directed his officials to help him. Putin answers "yes I did." Here's what actually happened. Putin had just stated that he in no way directed anyone to interfere in the election, that there was no collusion, and that it was all ridiculous nonsense. Putin called the accusations garbage more than once in the press conference. Putin was then asked by a reporter why people should believe his denials about election interference and if he would hand over the 12 people Mueller indicted (show indictments btw). Putin took out his translator ear piece and gave a long answer about working with Trump to find out if crimes were committed, America and Russia working together on other stuff, treaties, etc. During that answer (bottom clip) he again said the accusations of interference were not true. At the end of his answer, the same reporter who asked him the previous questions asked "Did you want Trump to win and did you instruct officials to help him." By watching any other broadcast than CNN, it becomes very clear what happened. Putin did not hear the first half of the reporter's followup question because he was putting on an ear piece and the volume of the reporter's mic was down. Watch the top clip and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip. Look at the difference. You will see it is obvious that Putin did not hear the first question and only heard the second question about if he instructed people to help Trump. It's obvious that he thought it applied to what he was just talking about, which was America and Russia working together. It's so funny how in the foreign broadcasts and some of the American ones, it's clear that Putin didn't hear the first half of the question. But on CNN the volume is magically up and it appears that Putin heard both questions. But the fact is that Putin had just spent most of the press conference denying any interference in the election or collusion with Trump. He wasn't all of a sudden admitting it now. He didn't hear the first question. The hoaxers never play any of the rest of the press conference with all the denials. In another press conference after this one Putin again says it was all a hoax cooked up to undermine Trump's presidency. If the MSM cared at all about America or the truth they would lay out what I just did. If you don't want to watch all the context, just watch the top clip, the beginning of the bottom clip, and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip and you will see clearly what happened.

MAZE

58,564 次观看 • 1 年前

Mike Benz explains the European Union is stepping up their mass global censorship under the Digital Services Act ahead of elections for conservative candidates 🚨 He warns the fines against Elon Musk and X will greatly increase “There's really nothing an American company can do to defend itself against millions or billions of dollars of threats from the foreign government. You need your own government to stick up for you. We are at a crossroads right now in a election season across Europe. For example, the EU has activated its rapid response disinformation units under the Digital Censorship Act to basically play favorites in the Hungarian election and all across Europe this year. As there's a rising tide of MAGA-aligned or populist conservative or right-wing political movements, and the diplomatic response has to be commensurate with the severity of the situation. Elon Musk was fined $140 million for basically not complying with this extortion shakedown. What happens when that fine is $140 billion in the months leading up to the U.S presidential election in 2028 or ahead of the midterms? I believe that leverage has to be created and a serious diplomatic response has to be initiated so that we can protect the American companies against foreign regulators who are trying to conduct a boomerang attack against our own politics by preventing them from platforming us.”

Mike Benz explains the European Union is stepping up their mass global censorship under the Digital Services Act ahead of elections for conservative candidates 🚨 He warns the fines against Elon Musk and X will greatly increase “There's really nothing an American company can do to defend itself against millions or billions of dollars of threats from the foreign government. You need your own government to stick up for you. We are at a crossroads right now in a election season across Europe. For example, the EU has activated its rapid response disinformation units under the Digital Censorship Act to basically play favorites in the Hungarian election and all across Europe this year. As there's a rising tide of MAGA-aligned or populist conservative or right-wing political movements, and the diplomatic response has to be commensurate with the severity of the situation. Elon Musk was fined $140 million for basically not complying with this extortion shakedown. What happens when that fine is $140 billion in the months leading up to the U.S presidential election in 2028 or ahead of the midterms? I believe that leverage has to be created and a serious diplomatic response has to be initiated so that we can protect the American companies against foreign regulators who are trying to conduct a boomerang attack against our own politics by preventing them from platforming us.”

Wall Street Apes

33,616 次观看 • 6 个月前

The vulnerabilities, backdoors, and nonexistent security on these election machines and software are so bad, that not only can you change votes during an election, but you can change the audit trail so a forensic audit of the machines and of the election itself becomes useless. CISA, the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, and DHS all knew that these machines and software were compromised but certified them anyway. You need to start asking yourself why? The most alarming part is that they all knew about foreign interference in our elections, including new revelations that the NSA, the National Security Administration, who's supposed to protect our country from threats, both foreign and domestic, purposely withheld intelligence from President Donald Trump himself, that China was actively interfering in the 2020 election.

The vulnerabilities, backdoors, and nonexistent security on these election machines and software are so bad, that not only can you change votes during an election, but you can change the audit trail so a forensic audit of the machines and of the election itself becomes useless. CISA, the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, and DHS all knew that these machines and software were compromised but certified them anyway. You need to start asking yourself why? The most alarming part is that they all knew about foreign interference in our elections, including new revelations that the NSA, the National Security Administration, who's supposed to protect our country from threats, both foreign and domestic, purposely withheld intelligence from President Donald Trump himself, that China was actively interfering in the 2020 election.

The SCIF

10,811 次观看 • 2 个月前

‼️ Romanian presidential candidate Calin Georgescu detained Calin Georgescu, a pro-Russian candidate in the presidential election, the results of which were canceled due to alleged Russian interference, has been detained in Romania. The politician's car was stopped on the road and he was then taken to the Prosecutor General's Office for questioning. Also arrested this morning were people from Georgescu's entourage who are suspected of a number of crimes, such as creating an organization of fascist, racist and xenophobic nature, as well as promoting the cult of people guilty of genocide or war crimes. According to the Romanian Prosecutor General's Office, there is a clear link between the financing of Georgescu's election campaign and Russia. An extensive network of fake accounts flooded TikTok with messages in support of Calin Georgescu during the presidential campaign. Romanian authorities believe that the network of propaganda bots was coordinated by the Russian Federation. 😀 Earlier, law enforcement officers found $10 million in cash and plane tickets to Moscow in an underground safe in the house of Georgescu's bodyguard. White head blue jacket and red pants - there is clearly some symbolism encoded in this outfit!

‼️ Romanian presidential candidate Calin Georgescu detained Calin Georgescu, a pro-Russian candidate in the presidential election, the results of which were canceled due to alleged Russian interference, has been detained in Romania. The politician's car was stopped on the road and he was then taken to the Prosecutor General's Office for questioning. Also arrested this morning were people from Georgescu's entourage who are suspected of a number of crimes, such as creating an organization of fascist, racist and xenophobic nature, as well as promoting the cult of people guilty of genocide or war crimes. According to the Romanian Prosecutor General's Office, there is a clear link between the financing of Georgescu's election campaign and Russia. An extensive network of fake accounts flooded TikTok with messages in support of Calin Georgescu during the presidential campaign. Romanian authorities believe that the network of propaganda bots was coordinated by the Russian Federation. 😀 Earlier, law enforcement officers found $10 million in cash and plane tickets to Moscow in an underground safe in the house of Georgescu's bodyguard. White head blue jacket and red pants - there is clearly some symbolism encoded in this outfit!

NEXTA

364,328 次观看 • 1 年前

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

697,242 次观看 • 4 个月前

CNN was just forced to read on air why the Georgia prosecutor dropped the entire election case against President Trump. And their viewers are not going to like what they heard...especially the part where he said: “contesting an election is not unlawful.” A direct hit to the narrative they have been peddling for years. “He is saying that they are not going to move forward with this case.” “And he summarized it in part by saying that he made this decision by examining the case file, examining what the jury had been presented, and also considerations of the law.” “You know, he says that, you know, contesting an election is not unlawful. But, you know, and that is part of the reasons for why he decided not to move forward with the charges at this point.”

CNN was just forced to read on air why the Georgia prosecutor dropped the entire election case against President Trump. And their viewers are not going to like what they heard...especially the part where he said: “contesting an election is not unlawful.” A direct hit to the narrative they have been peddling for years. “He is saying that they are not going to move forward with this case.” “And he summarized it in part by saying that he made this decision by examining the case file, examining what the jury had been presented, and also considerations of the law.” “You know, he says that, you know, contesting an election is not unlawful. But, you know, and that is part of the reasons for why he decided not to move forward with the charges at this point.”

Overton

1,057,581 次观看 • 10 个月前

WHO DECIDES WHAT YOU’RE ALLOWED TO BELIEVE? THE PROPAGANDA NETWORK THEY NEVER WANTED YOU TO SEE! Behind every major political narrative are networks of money, media contacts, organizations, and operatives that shape public perception without making the front page. The Integrity Initiative is one example. In 2018, hackers released thousands of documents from the British Institute for Statecraft, the group behind the project. It claimed to counter Russian disinformation, but the leaks revealed advisory boards, network management, training, technical support, and grants. According to Max Blumenthal, the Initiative maintained clusters of journalists, politicians, and operatives across NATO states under the banner of combating Russian disinformation. Questions remain unanswered about this initiative: who funded it, who ran it, and how it was used. The Jeremy Corbyn case offers insight. The network appeared to coordinate efforts portraying Corbyn as a Russian puppet, using media contacts and narrative-building to undermine his credibility and link him to Russian interests. The same pattern surfaced in Spain. When retired Army Colonel Pedro Baños was considered to lead Spain’s National Security Department, the network labeled him pro-Kremlin. It prepared media material, organized a social-media campaign, contacted Spanish newspapers, and activated its UK team to amplify the effort internationally. The documents do not prove every claim was false or that every outlet involved was part of an intelligence operation. They do show an organized network built to monitor, coordinate, and influence public perceptions of political figures and events. There is precedent. During the Cold War, the CIA secretly supported the Congress for Cultural Freedom, a network of writers, journals, conferences, and intellectuals created to counter communism. Its covert funding was exposed in 1966. That does not prove every modern information network is intelligence-controlled. But it shows governments have used information, culture, and intellectual networks as tools of state power, and the public often learns how only after documents emerge. Elizabeth Lane (ELIZABETH LANE) joins me for the first episode of this series to break down her investigation into The Integrity Initiative and the global influence operation.

WHO DECIDES WHAT YOU’RE ALLOWED TO BELIEVE? THE PROPAGANDA NETWORK THEY NEVER WANTED YOU TO SEE! Behind every major political narrative are networks of money, media contacts, organizations, and operatives that shape public perception without making the front page. The Integrity Initiative is one example. In 2018, hackers released thousands of documents from the British Institute for Statecraft, the group behind the project. It claimed to counter Russian disinformation, but the leaks revealed advisory boards, network management, training, technical support, and grants. According to Max Blumenthal, the Initiative maintained clusters of journalists, politicians, and operatives across NATO states under the banner of combating Russian disinformation. Questions remain unanswered about this initiative: who funded it, who ran it, and how it was used. The Jeremy Corbyn case offers insight. The network appeared to coordinate efforts portraying Corbyn as a Russian puppet, using media contacts and narrative-building to undermine his credibility and link him to Russian interests. The same pattern surfaced in Spain. When retired Army Colonel Pedro Baños was considered to lead Spain’s National Security Department, the network labeled him pro-Kremlin. It prepared media material, organized a social-media campaign, contacted Spanish newspapers, and activated its UK team to amplify the effort internationally. The documents do not prove every claim was false or that every outlet involved was part of an intelligence operation. They do show an organized network built to monitor, coordinate, and influence public perceptions of political figures and events. There is precedent. During the Cold War, the CIA secretly supported the Congress for Cultural Freedom, a network of writers, journals, conferences, and intellectuals created to counter communism. Its covert funding was exposed in 1966. That does not prove every modern information network is intelligence-controlled. But it shows governments have used information, culture, and intellectual networks as tools of state power, and the public often learns how only after documents emerge. Elizabeth Lane (ELIZABETH LANE) joins me for the first episode of this series to break down her investigation into The Integrity Initiative and the global influence operation.

Ben Swann

11,445 次观看 • 16 天前