Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨🇩🇪“THIS ELECTION INTERFERENCE IS GOING TO BLOW UP.” German MEP Peter Bystron issues an extraordinary warning from inside the European Parliament. ROMANIA. SLOVAKIA. THE NETHERLANDS. FRANCE. GERMANY. Allegations of political interference are now reaching across Europe. And this is no longer a question that can simply be dismissed as...

34,881 görüntüleme • 16 saat önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨🇩🇪“RUSSIAN ELECTION INTERFERENCE” — BUT THE CHANNEL HAD JUST 351 SUBSCRIBERS? German MEP Petr Bystron raises serious questions about the narrative used to describe alleged Russian interference ahead of the European Parliament elections. He describes a Prague-based news operation that authorities alleged was being used as a vehicle for Russian influence across Europe. So Bystron says they looked at its actual reach. According to him, its English-language YouTube channel had just: 351 SUBSCRIBERS. And videos receiving, he says, an average of only: 4 OR 5 LIKES. Yet Europeans were being warned that an operation of this kind represented an attempt to manipulate elections across the European Union. Then Bystron makes the much bigger allegation. He says that during the political campaign surrounding these accusations, the conservative grouping he is discussing ultimately lost 27 seats. That does not by itself prove the campaign caused those losses. But it raises a question worth examining: WHO WAS ACTUALLY INFLUENCING THE ELECTION? A tiny media operation allegedly pushing Russian propaganda? Or the enormous political and media response generated around the allegation itself? If governments are going to invoke “foreign interference” during an election campaign, the evidential threshold should be exceptionally high. Because accusations of election interference can themselves influence voters. And once that happens, the institutions claiming to protect democracy risk becoming participants in the political process. 351 SUBSCRIBERS. 4–5 LIKES PER VIDEO. AN ALLEGED THREAT TO ELECTIONS ACROSS EUROPE. Petr Bystron asks whether the real manipulation was somewhere else entirely. WATCH AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF. Petr Bystron

Jim Ferguson

12,022 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

🚨🇩🇪“THEY ARE INFLUENCING ELECTIONS” — GERMAN MEP PETR BYSTRON This should concern anyone who believes elections belong to the people. German MEP Petr Bystron points to one of the most controversial statements made by former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton following the annulment of Romania's presidential election. Speaking about enforcement of European rules, Breton said words translated as: “We did it in Romania, and we will obviously do it if necessary in Germany.” Bystron's interpretation is explosive. He argues that what Europe calls protecting democracy is increasingly becoming interference in the democratic process itself. Breton disputes that interpretation and has maintained that he was talking about enforcing EU law against online interference — not claiming Brussels could simply overturn elections. But that makes the question even more important: WHAT EXACTLY DID “WE DID IT IN ROMANIA” MEAN? Romania's presidential election was annulled. Germany's AfD has faced extraordinary political and institutional pressure. And Bystron says these developments have now caught the attention of lawmakers in the United States. Democracy cannot mean: “You may vote for anyone you like — provided the establishment approves of the result.” If European institutions are acting solely to protect elections from unlawful interference, show the evidence. Show the legal basis. Show exactly what interventions took place. Because protecting democracy and managing its outcomes are two very different things. THE PEOPLE MUST DECIDE WHO GOVERNS THEM. NOT BRUSSELS. Petr Bystron

Jim Ferguson

16,240 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

🇩🇪 EXCLUSIVE: PETR BYSTRON SAYS EU ELECTIONS WERE “MANIPULATED” — CALLS U.S. REPORT A BOMBSHELL I sat down with Petr Bystron, foreign policy spokesman for Alternative für Deutschland and Member of the European Parliament, and he did not hold back. According to Bystron, the recent U.S. Senate Judiciary findings are a “bombshell” — alleging that the European Commission interfered in multiple European elections while censoring dissent across the bloc. His claim? That what many Europeans “felt” for years is now being formally documented: • Suppression of opposition voices • Pressure on social media platforms • Narrative control during COVID • Election influence in Romania and beyond Bystron went further — arguing that if interference is proven, then the legitimacy of the current European Parliament itself comes into question. He also alleged a double standard in Germany: Left-wing extremist violence ignored. Opposition voices prosecuted. Satirical memes punished with jail time. The political temperature in Europe is rising — fast. Bystron says his party supports dismantling the Commission structure in its current form and restoring authority to directly elected national lawmakers. And when I asked how close AfD is to power in Germany? His answer was simple: “Soon. Things will change.” The transatlantic pressure is building. The sovereignty debate is intensifying. And Brussels is firmly in the spotlight. This isn’t a minor policy dispute. It’s a legitimacy fight. Petr Bystron AfD

Jim Ferguson

92,046 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨🚨🚨🇵🇱 Polish member of European Parliament, Ryszard Legutko starts dropping TRUTH BOMBS about the blatant CORRUPTION in the EU 😳🔥 : “2 minutes of bitter #Truth and that TRUTH is : The European Parliament has done a lot of DAMAGE in Europe - It has been sending a false message that it represents the European demos, but there isn’t and there won’t be any DEMOCRACY!!!” “The parliament infected Europe with shameless partisanship!! The infection became so contagious that they infected other institutions, like the European Commission” “The parliament has ABANDONED the basic function of representing its people!! Instead it has become a machine that implements the so-called European Agenda, thus alienating millions of voters!!” “The parliament has become a vehicle of the left, to IMPOSE their MONOPOLY with their fierce INTOLERANCE towards dissenting views!!!” “Call it what you will, but DEMOCRACY it is NOT!!!” “In conclusion, this parliament represents the demos that does NOT exist, works for the project that ignores REALITY and LAW, SHUNS accountability, turns its back on MILLIONS of people and serves the interest of one political orientation, and that is just the TIP of the ICEBERG!!” - We all know EXACTLY what he’s talking about!!! #Agenda2030 #NWO Not many people have courage like this brave man - WHAT A SPEECH!!!💪💪 #EU #Monopoly #Parliament #Corruption #NotaDemocracy #NWO #TheGreatReset #illuminati #Zionists #Khazars

Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE🦁

262,302 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🇷🇴“THE EVIDENCE DOESN’T EXIST” — EXPLOSIVE CLAIM OVER ROMANIA’S CANCELLED ELECTION This goes directly to the heart of one of the most extraordinary democratic controversies in modern Europe. In my interview with Laura Gherasim, we return to the annulment of Romania's 2024 presidential election. And Laura makes an extraordinary allegation. She argues that the justification necessary to cancel the election was never established — and says: “WE WILL NEVER HAVE THE EVIDENCE, SIMPLY BECAUSE IT DOESN’T EXIST.” Think about the gravity of that statement. An election was annulled. Millions of votes were effectively discarded. A presidential candidate was subsequently prevented from standing in the rerun. Yet the fundamental question remains: WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT JUSTIFIED OVERTURNING THE RESULT? Laura argues that allegations of electoral interference must be proved, not simply asserted. That principle should transcend Romanian politics. If democratic institutions possess compelling evidence justifying the cancellation of an election, the public deserves to see the case laid out transparently. If they cannot produce it, then Europe has a much bigger problem. Because democracy cannot mean voters are sovereign only when institutions approve of their decision. THIS IS WHY I WENT TO ROMANIA TO INVESTIGATE. Watch this exchange carefully. The implications extend far beyond Romania. IF AN ELECTION CAN BE CANCELLED WITHOUT THE PUBLIC EVER SEEING CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE, WHAT DOES “DEMOCRACY” ACTUALLY MEAN? Laura Gherasim 🇷🇴 George Simion 🇲🇩

Jim Ferguson

16,534 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce