Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Ryan Grim joined Sam Seder on The Majority Report for a debate over whether politicians like Marjorie Taylor Greene can credibly claim solidarity with Palestinians, and whether working across ideological lines on Gaza helps expand opposition to Israel’s war crimes or risks rehabilitating right-wing figures with deeply reactionary records....

56,137 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🇺🇸🇮🇷 IS ISRAEL DRAGGING THE U.S. INTO ANOTHER FOREVER WAR? This debate between Cenk Uygur and IDF’s Jonathan Conricus got very very heated. I’ve never seen Cenk so upset The discussion started with a focus on the imminent war with Iran, and whether it is in America’s best interest Iran cannot reach the U.S. mainland with its missiles, does not have a nuclear weapon despite decades of warnings the country is on the verge of one, and has made it clear it does not want a war with the U.S. Cenk argues the Israeli lobby is the reason the U.S. is about to start a new war Jonathan disagrees, criticizing those who blame Israel for everything. In his view, Iran is building a nuclear weapon, as well as ballistic missiles that can reach the U.S., and has a history of destabilizing the region while killing U.S. servicemen through their proxies. The debate then moves to Israeli policy in the region, and the future of Gaza and the West Bank, and this is where it gets very emotional. Jonathan does not believe in a two-state solution, and Cenk equates that with genocide, asking one question: What will happen to the Palestinians if they do not accept to be integrated into Israel? Watch the full debate below with @jconricus0 and Cenk Uygur below. 03:00 - War nearly guaranteed, U.S. military buildup largest since Iraq, Israel controlling US policy 06:02 - Israel’s three “reasons” for war: nukes, missiles, foreign policy... none serve US interests 09:20 - Iranian people’s protests ignored; focus should be on their freedom, not regime 12:40 - Iranian regime’s threat: nuclear ambitions, ballistic missiles, proxy wars 16:15 - US has historic chance to reshape Middle East, reduce Iranian terror influence 19:50 - Critique of US politicians prioritizing Israel over Americans; 80% oppose war 23:30 - Israel blamed for pushing US into wars repeatedly; weapons of mass destruction parallels 27:15 - Jonathan argues Iran threatens Israel; discussion of Iranian missile capabilities 31:00 - Israel’s defense role vs US leadership in the region; Iran-China-Russia tech cooperation 34:45 - Extremist insurgencies likely if Iran invaded; past examples Iraq & Afghanistan 38:20 - Israel’s “Greater Israel” ambitions and annexations; impact on Palestinians 41:50 - Historical context: 1948 Nakba and ethnic cleansing accusations revisited 45:30 - Debate over Palestinian resistance vs Israeli self-defense; moral questions raised 49:10 - US public largely against war; Israel benefits more than America from regime collapse 52:45 - Peace offers to Palestinians rejected multiple times; Israel insists on defense 55:30 - Current Israeli strategy: annexation, control over Judea & Samaria, handling 5.5M Palestinians

Mario Nawfal

521,913 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨🇮🇱🇵🇸 “HUMANITY IS ON THE LINE” - DEBATE EXPLODES OVER GAZA, HAMAS, AND WHO’S LYING and Joseph Cohen from the Israel Advocacy Movement went head-to-head in a volatile showdown that quickly turned personal. Cohen called Hamas a death cult. Hinkle said Israel’s committing genocide. Every line drew fire. They went blow-for-blow on: * Whether Israel’s bombing of Gaza is defense or revenge * If Hamas has any legitimacy left after October 7 * Why civilians keep dying while both sides claim self-defense * Whether Western media is covering truth or propaganda * And what “peace” even means when neither side will back down Cohen says Israel’s survival is non-negotiable. Hinkle says it’s humanity that’s on the line. No spin. No script. Just raw conviction and chaos caught on camera. 00:00 – Opening clash over “genocide defenders” and defining invasion 00:40 – Accusations of war profiteering and monetization motives 01:05 – “How can you hate something that doesn’t exist?” The Palestine question 01:55 – Joseph says a Palestinian state guarantees perpetual violence 03:42 – The 1937 Partition Plan and Arab rejection revisited 06:17 – Jackson calls Israel a genocidal beast erasing Palestinians 09:52 – Joseph says Palestinians rejected every major peace plan 12:39 – Jackson points to U.S. hypocrisy on Jewish refugees 14:30 – Haavara Agreement and Western refusal of Jewish refugees 17:54 – Joseph outlines British Mandate and Balfour Declaration history 21:34 – Moderator asks if two states fail, what’s the alternative 29:01 – Destroying wells and cemeteries sparks debate over strategy or war crime 33:27 – Joseph says Hamas hides hostages as bargaining chips 36:08 – “Israel was forced into this war,” Hamas planned it all 49:09 – Bulldozed cemeteries ignite moral and military debate 51:30 – Jackson mocks Israel’s “fantasy world” of no genocide 1:00:02 – Should media platforms interview terrorist leaders 1:05:19 – Jackson says Israel sees Palestinians as genetically violent 1:32:05 – Final exchange on Hezbollah, Houthis, and U.S. troops

Mario Nawfal

1,489,459 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten